hodler

5 Jun 2026, 18:30

SEC’s Crypto Advocate Says Blockchain Code Is Protected By The Constitution

A federal securities regulator is drawing a line between writing blockchain code and being responsible for how that code gets used — and the distinction could reshape how the government treats software developers in the decentralized finance space. Broader Regulatory Shift Behind The Remarks Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission, made the case Tuesday at the IC3 Blockchain Camp at Princeton University that publishing open-source blockchain software is a protected activity under the First Amendment. She argued that developers who release DeFi code should not be automatically classified as securities intermediaries just because other people use what they built. LATEST: SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce says securities rules shouldn’t apply to blockchains themselves, noting “blockchains are used to do many things other than transact in securities.” pic.twitter.com/hztB7r72ap — CoinMarketCap (@CoinMarketCap) June 4, 2026 Legal liability, she said, should fall on those who actually engage in unlawful conduct — not on the people who wrote the underlying tools. Peirce’s remarks fit into a wider rethinking underway at the SEC since Chair Paul Atkins took the helm. The agency has been pulling back from what Atkins has described as regulation by enforcement, with its Crypto Task Force now reviewing how existing securities laws apply to digital assets and decentralized systems. Peirce, a long-standing voice for clearer rules in the crypto space, has been central to that push. Rules Built For A Different World She pointed to the SEC’s rulebook as evidence of the problem. The agency’s regulations were designed around intermediaries — brokers, dealers, exchanges, clearinghouses, transfer agents, investment advisers, and investment companies. Peirce questioned whether those same rules make sense when applied to distributed blockchain networks that exist for purposes well beyond securities transactions. Her comments came weeks after SEC staff issued separate guidance addressing broker-dealer registration requirements for certain user interfaces. That guidance indicated some front-end websites and software platforms that provide access to decentralized protocols may not qualify as brokers under the traditional legal definition — a signal that the agency is rethinking how far its existing categories can stretch. Digital Assets As Long-Term Priority The SEC has also signaled that crypto and blockchain technology will remain a focus for years ahead. In its draft Strategic Plan through fiscal 2030, the agency described blockchain and crypto assets as technologies with the potential to reshape America’s financial infrastructure. Taken together, the staff guidance, the strategic plan, and Peirce’s speech at Princeton paint a picture of an agency trying to redraw boundaries that were never clearly set. Featured image from Pixabay, chart from TradingView

5 Jun 2026, 18:18

Bitcoin’s Future Is Now a Four-Way Ideological Battle, According to Michael Saylor

Bitcoin has moved beyond being a narrow technical experiment or niche monetary protest, according to Strategy Chairman Michael Saylor. He believes the crypto asset is now the dominant digital monetary network and is a global asset with wide implications for individuals, institutions, corporations, banks, capital markets, and nation-states. As Bitcoin expands, Saylor said that the community is naturally splitting into four overlapping ideologies that shape how people think about its future development, adoption, and protection, even though all share a belief in Bitcoin’s importance. Four Ideological Camps In his latest post on X, Saylor identified these groups as Maximalists, Capitalists, Technologists, and Fundamentalists, each emphasizing a different priority in how the world’s largest crypto asset should evolve. Bitcoin Maximalists, for one, see BTC as the dominant monetary network and a breakthrough in digital scarcity. They focus on its role as incorruptible money, a long-term store of value, protection against inflation and monetary instability, and a “moral and civilizational advance” in economic systems, while stressing “there is no second best,” though they risk being unclear on how BTC integrates into broader financial systems. Bitcoin Capitalists, on the other hand, view BTC as digital capital that should integrate deeply into global markets including banks, corporations, securities, credit instruments, and sovereign systems, emphasizing institutional adoption, custody, lending, and capital market products. But this group faces risks of “reckless financialization” and added complexity. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Technologists focus on the continuous improvement of the protocol, including scalability, privacy, usability, and security. They believe that “responsible protocol improvement is not corruption.” They are of the view that BTC must keep evolving to remain useful, though they risk introducing harmful changes if base-layer modifications undermine stability. Bitcoin Fundamentalists focus on preservation of BTC’s core properties such as decentralization, self-custody, immutability, censorship resistance, and permissionless access. They warn against institutional capture or protocol dilution. However, Saylor said that they may risk limiting broader adoption if they reject too much integration or change. Saylor explained these ideologies are not mutually exclusive, but different forces serving distinct roles in the ecosystem: Maximalists provide conviction, Capitalists drive adoption, Technologists enable innovation, and Fundamentalists safeguard core principles. The central tension lies in balancing these perspectives since each can become problematic if taken to extremes. In Saylor’s view, the healthiest path forward is a synthesis. “The strongest path forward is not reckless change, institutional capture, or isolationist purity. It is disciplined expansion. Bitcoin’s power comes from the fact that it can serve many constituencies without belonging to any one of them.” Bitcoin’s Ideological Battles Over time, Bitcoin’s internal camps have often clashed over how the network should evolve. Maximalists frequently resisted changes they see as unnecessary or harmful to Bitcoin’s core design. This tension became especially clear during the scaling and block size debates, where different groups pushed competing visions for BTC’s future. Even major upgrades were difficult to agree on. For example, the SegWit upgrade was proposed in late 2015 but activated after years of debate following the block size wars. The post Bitcoin’s Future Is Now a Four-Way Ideological Battle, According to Michael Saylor appeared first on CryptoPotato .

5 Jun 2026, 18:10

THORChain restart drags on as Zcash vulnerability delays privacy-coin rollout

THORChain has remained offline for three weeks since it experienced a $10.7 million vault exploit. THORChain initially planned to integrate ZEC support into its platform, but even that is now delayed after a critical flaw was discovered in Zcash’s Orchard shielded pool. That decision could not have come at a worse time for ZEC, which has taken a beating since the AI–discovered vulnerability was revealed. What happened to THORChain and when will it restart? THORChain has been offline for three weeks following a major security breach that resulted in the loss of $10.7 million from one of its vaults. The problem at THORChain started with a flaw in a security system called the GG20 threshold signature scheme. An attacker was able to join the network as a node operator and exploit this weakness to drain funds from a single vault. The other four vaults were not affected. THORChain’s developers released a fix (version 3.19) several days ago, but the network is yet to resume normal operations. The team even added a new safety step called “key verify” to ensure every remaining vault is secure before operations resume. The restarting process will include node operators moving to the new software version, migrating funds, and finally reopening trading. Barraford estimated that this process will take several days to complete once it begins. The recovery plan, called ADR028, aims to cover the $10.7 million loss without creating new RUNE tokens or diluting existing holders. Instead, the protocol’s own money will be used, and any remaining loss will be shared with synthetic asset holders. The protocol is also offering the hacker a bounty to return the funds. What was the Zcash bug, and why did it cause such a big price drop? Zcash was supposed to be THORChain’s next chain integration, ahead of Monero, but that timeline slipped after security researcher Taylor Hornby, working under contract with Shielded Labs, discovered a soundness bug in Zcash’s Orchard shielded pool. The bug has been present in the Orchard protocol “rulebook” since it launched in May 2022. Hornby used Anthropic’s Opus 4.8 model to create a working example of the exploit in a test environment and confirmed it could produce fake tokens in a local test environment. An emergency soft fork quickly temporarily disabled Orchard transactions on June 2, and a hard fork (NU6.2) reactivated the pool with a corrected circuit on June 3. The five-day turnaround from discovery to resolution was only the second security-driven protocol upgrade in Zcash’s ten-year history. When the bug was disclosed, ZEC dropped roughly 40% within 24 hours. CoinMarketCap data showed the token trading near $333, down from a 52-week high above $700. Arthur Hayes, the chief investment officer at Maelstrom and co-founder of BitMEX, said on X that he liquidated his entire ZEC position. Hayes previously set a public price target of 10% of Bitcoin’s value for ZEC, but the 30% drop forced him to rethink. He left open the possibility of buying back the tokens if his concerns about supply integrity proved unfounded. Blockchain intelligence firm Arkham flagged at least one large holder who watched more than half the value of a $174 million ZEC position evaporate without selling. Shielded Labs, the organization that fixed the bug, explained that it is cryptographically impossible to determine whether or not the bug was ever used due to the four-year window before it was found, but the firm also stated that it is unlikely the bug could have evaded years of expert review if it was active. Just discovering the vulnerability required AI-assisted auditing techniques, and the remediation window was narrow once the flaw became known. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

5 Jun 2026, 17:00

TRX Spot Listing Launches on Bitnomial, Supporting Regulated U.S. Access to TRON

Geneva, Switzerland — June 5, 2026 — TRON DAO , the community-governed DAO dedicated to accelerating the decentralization of the internet through blockchain technology and decentralized applications (dApps), today announced the spot listing of TRX, the native utility token of the TRON network, on Bitnomial , a CFTC -regulated U.S. exchange and clearinghouse. The listing expands access to TRX for U.S. market participants through a regulated trading venue, providing investors and institutions with an additional platform to access the native utility token of the TRON blockchain. TRX supports transactions, smart contract execution, decentralized applications, and network governance across one of the world’s most active blockchain ecosystems. TRON is recognized as a leading blockchain for stablecoin activity and digital asset settlement, hosting more than $89 billion in circulating USDT and over $27 billion in total value locked (TVL). “Bitnomial’s listing of TRX is an important step in expanding access to TRON through regulated U.S. market infrastructure,” said Justin Sun, Founder of TRON. “As demand for compliant digital asset products continues to grow, the availability of TRX on regulated platforms supports broader market access, greater transparency and the continued maturation of the digital asset ecosystem.” Bitnomial, LLC, headquartered in Chicago, is a derivatives exchange company that owns and operates U.S. CFTC-regulated exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and clearing brokerage (FCM) subsidiaries. Bitnomial offers leveraged spot, perpetuals, futures, options, and prediction markets on a single unified exchange and clearinghouse with digital asset margin and settlement capabilities. The addition of TRX further expands the range of digital assets available on regulated U.S. financial infrastructure, building on a series of recent developments that have strengthened the institutional foundation of the TRON network. In recent months, TRX became available for custody through Anchorage Digital, the first federally chartered crypto bank in the United States, Supporting the expansion of tokenized real-world asset products with top-tier asset managers on the network. As digital asset markets continue to evolve, open blockchain networks remain central to expanding access to transparent, permissionless financial infrastructure. The Bitnomial listing reflects continued progress toward making blockchain-based assets more accessible through reliable and established market infrastructure. About TRON DAO TRON DAO is a community-governed DAO dedicated to accelerating the decentralization of the internet via blockchain technology and dApps. Founded in September 2017, the TRON blockchain has experienced significant growth since its MainNet launch in May 2018. Until recently, TRON hosted the largest circulating supply of USD Tether (USDT) stablecoin, which currently exceeds $89 billion. As of June 2026, the TRON blockchain has recorded over 385 million in total user accounts, more than 14 billion in total transactions, and over $27 billion in total value locked (TVL), based on TRONSCAN. Recognized as the global settlement layer for stablecoin transactions and everyday purchases with proven success, TRON is “Moving Trillions, Empowering Billions.” TRONNetwork | TRONDAO | X | YouTube | Telegram | Discord | Reddit | GitHub | Medium | Forum Media Contact Yeweon Park [email protected]

5 Jun 2026, 16:05

Ethereum Faces $547 Million Liquidation Risk as Key Price Levels Approach

BitcoinWorld Ethereum Faces $547 Million Liquidation Risk as Key Price Levels Approach A significant portion of the Ethereum long position market is under pressure, with on-chain data revealing that over $547 million in leveraged positions on decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms are at risk of liquidation. The analysis, shared by blockchain tracking firm Lookonchain, highlights specific price thresholds that could trigger a cascading sell-off. Key Liquidation Thresholds Identified According to Lookonchain, the at-risk positions total 343,075 ETH, spread across several critical price points. The most immediate danger zone sits between $1,565.72 and $1,555.04, where a combined $167.6 million in long positions could be wiped out. Should the price drop further, a larger cluster of $159 million in positions sits at $1,426.31, with the largest single cluster of $220 million at $1,361.73. Structural Selling Pressure Building Separate analysis from Spot On Chain adds a layer of concern, noting that structural selling pressure is accumulating in the market. The firm identified the $1,555–$1,566 range as an immediate critical threshold. A decisive break below this zone, they warned, could trigger a cascading decline, with the next major support level sitting at $1,426. This pattern is characteristic of leveraged markets, where forced liquidations can amplify downward price movements. What This Means for Ethereum Traders The current situation underscores the inherent risks in DeFi lending and margin trading platforms. Unlike centralized exchanges, DeFi protocols execute liquidations automatically through smart contracts, often leading to rapid, chain-reaction sell-offs. For traders holding long positions, the key takeaway is the importance of monitoring these on-chain data points, which provide a transparent view of market vulnerability. For the broader Ethereum market, a breach of the $1,555 support level could signal a period of heightened volatility. Conclusion The data from Lookonchain and Spot On Chain paints a clear picture of a market sitting on a knife’s edge. While Ethereum’s price action will ultimately determine the outcome, the concentration of liquidations at these specific levels provides a roadmap for potential volatility. Traders and investors should remain cautious as the market tests these critical thresholds. FAQs Q1: What is a liquidation in cryptocurrency trading? A liquidation occurs when a trader’s leveraged position is forcibly closed by the exchange or protocol because the margin balance has fallen below the required maintenance level. This happens automatically to prevent the platform from incurring losses. Q2: How does a cascading liquidation happen? A cascading liquidation occurs when a price drop triggers a series of forced sell-offs. These sell-offs push the price down further, triggering more liquidations, creating a feedback loop that can lead to rapid and severe price declines. Q3: Why are DeFi liquidations different from centralized exchange liquidations? DeFi liquidations are executed by smart contracts on the blockchain, making them automatic, transparent, and often faster than on centralized exchanges. They can also involve multiple protocols simultaneously, increasing the risk of a systemic event. This post Ethereum Faces $547 Million Liquidation Risk as Key Price Levels Approach first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

5 Jun 2026, 15:35

Zcash to Introduce New Audit Method to Verify Orchard Pool Supply After Security Patch

BitcoinWorld Zcash to Introduce New Audit Method to Verify Orchard Pool Supply After Security Patch Zcash, the privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has announced plans to implement a novel audit method to verify the total supply of its Orchard asset pool. This initiative follows a recent security patch applied to the network. The company stated it will release specific technical details and a full implementation plan later today, aiming to reconfirm the integrity of the asset pool and the accuracy of its supply after the system update. Background and Context The Orchard pool is a key component of Zcash’s shielded transaction system, designed to enhance user privacy by hiding transaction amounts and sender/receiver information. Ensuring the accuracy of the total supply within this pool is critical for maintaining trust in the Zcash network, as any discrepancy could undermine its economic model. The upcoming audit method is a direct response to a recent security patch, which was applied to address a potential vulnerability. While the patch itself was a routine security measure, the Zcash development team has decided to take the extra step of a full supply verification to reassure users and stakeholders. Why This Matters For Zcash users and investors, the integrity of the supply is foundational. Unlike transparent blockchains like Bitcoin, where all transactions are publicly visible, Zcash’s privacy features mean that supply verification is more complex. A verifiable audit method is essential to prove that no coins have been created or destroyed outside the protocol’s rules. This announcement is particularly significant because it demonstrates a proactive approach to security and transparency, which could help restore or strengthen confidence in the network following any concerns raised by the recent patch. Market and Industry Implications The move could set a precedent for other privacy-focused cryptocurrencies. As regulatory scrutiny on privacy coins intensifies globally, having robust, verifiable supply audit mechanisms could become a competitive advantage. It signals to regulators and the broader financial community that Zcash is committed to operational transparency, even while prioritizing user privacy. This balance is crucial for the long-term adoption of privacy coins in regulated markets. Conclusion Zcash’s forthcoming announcement on its new Orchard pool audit method represents a significant step in maintaining the network’s credibility. By proactively verifying its supply after a security patch, the Zcash team is addressing a core trust requirement for its user base. The details of the implementation, expected later today, will be closely watched by the cryptocurrency community for their technical rigor and potential applicability to other privacy-focused networks. FAQs Q1: What is the Orchard pool in Zcash? The Orchard pool is the latest generation of Zcash’s shielded transaction system, offering enhanced privacy features for users. It allows for transactions where amounts, sender, and receiver information are encrypted. Q2: Why is a supply audit necessary after a security patch? A security patch, while routine, can introduce changes to the underlying code. A supply audit ensures that the patch did not inadvertently affect the total coin supply or create any discrepancies in the asset pool, thereby maintaining the integrity of the network. Q3: How will the new audit method work? Specific technical details are expected to be released later today. Generally, such methods involve cryptographic proofs that allow anyone to verify the total supply without revealing individual transaction details, preserving privacy while ensuring accuracy. This post Zcash to Introduce New Audit Method to Verify Orchard Pool Supply After Security Patch first appeared on BitcoinWorld .