Invest ideasNews
30 Apr 2026, 13:41
Top 5 crypto entrepreneurs shaping the industry in 2026
The cryptocurrency industry is shaped not only by technology and assets, but by the people driving its development. Entrepreneurs, builders, and industry leaders continue to influence how digital assets are adopted, regulated, and integrated into the global financial system. As traditional finance increasingly engages with crypto, including participation from major institutional players, the role of individual leadership has become more visible. This article highlights five entrepreneurs who have played a significant role in advancing adoption and continue to shape the crypto sector in 2026. Changpeng Zhao Changpeng Zhao is the co-founder and former CEO of Binance and remains one of the most influential figures in the crypto industry. Zhao demonstrated early conviction in Bitcoin and blockchain technology, most notably in 2013, when he sold his apartment to invest in crypto, a decision that has since become one of the most cited examples of long-term belief in the sector. Under his leadership, Binance grew into a global crypto ecosystem, introducing new trading products and supporting the expansion of decentralized finance. While no longer serving as CEO, Zhao continues to influence the industry through investments and public advocacy for crypto adoption. Emin Gün Sirer Emin Gün Sirer is the co-founder and CEO of Ava Labs. Before launching Ava Labs, Sirer built a strong academic and practical reputation in blockchain research. A former professor at Cornell University, he contributed to early research on blockchain scalability and security. At Ava Labs, Sirer leads development of the Avalanche network, which aims to deliver high-throughput, scalable blockchain infrastructure. His work continues to focus on making blockchain technology practical for a broad range of use cases across industries. Josip Heit Josip Heit serves as Senior Strategy Advisor at Apertum Holding Ltd, the company behind the Apertum Blockchain, a Layer 1 network. In 2025, the project received multiple Layer 1 blockchain awards, reflecting its technical progress. Apertum focuses on accessibility, enabling users to acquire its native token across more than 170 countries using multiple fiat currencies and payment methods. Heit has been active in the digital asset space since 2013 and remains involved in shaping blockchain adoption through strategy and ecosystem development. Paolo Ardoino Paolo Ardoino is the CEO of Tether and the CTO of Bitfinex. He joined Bitfinex in 2014 and became CTO in 2016, focusing on trading engine performance, scalability, and platform reliability. His technical leadership has played a key role in the operational stability of both companies. As CEO of Tether, Ardoino has emphasized financial inclusion, particularly in emerging markets, positioning the company as a core infrastructure provider within the global digital asset economy. Justin Sun Justin Sun is the founder of TRON and a prominent entrepreneur in the blockchain sector. He entered the industry with a focus on decentralizing internet infrastructure. Since its launch, TRON has evolved into a major blockchain-based operating system supporting decentralized applications and digital content platforms. Sun’s approach to ecosystem growth and market positioning continues to influence the broader Web3 landscape. Featured images via Flickr (CC0 1.0 Universal). The post Top 5 crypto entrepreneurs shaping the industry in 2026 appeared first on Finbold .
30 Apr 2026, 13:30
Solana Research Institute Launches in Switzerland to Unlock Europe’s Institutional Finance Market
BitcoinWorld Solana Research Institute Launches in Switzerland to Unlock Europe’s Institutional Finance Market Solana has officially launched the Solana Research Institute (SRI) in Switzerland, marking a pivotal move to penetrate Europe’s institutional finance market. This new facility aims to help companies evaluate and adopt public blockchains under evolving regulations like the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework and the U.S. GENIUS stablecoin bill. The initiative signals a strategic shift toward compliance-driven blockchain adoption in the region. Solana Research Institute: A Gateway to European Compliance The Solana Research Institute, based in Switzerland, represents a calculated effort to bridge blockchain technology with institutional requirements. Switzerland’s neutral regulatory stance and its alignment with MiCA provide an ideal testing ground. The SRI will focus on helping firms navigate complex legal landscapes while leveraging Solana’s high-speed, low-cost infrastructure. This move directly targets Europe’s $10 trillion institutional asset market, where compliance is paramount. Switzerland has long been a hub for blockchain innovation, with Zug’s ‘Crypto Valley’ hosting numerous firms. By establishing the SRI there, Solana taps into a ecosystem of regulators, banks, and tech talent. The institute will offer workshops, research papers, and technical audits to assist enterprises in integrating public blockchains. This hands-on approach builds trust and demonstrates Solana’s commitment to regulatory adherence. MiCA Framework and Its Impact on Solana’s Strategy The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, effective from 2024, imposes strict rules on crypto issuers and service providers in the EU. Solana’s SRI directly addresses these requirements by offering compliance tools and educational resources. For instance, the institute will help firms meet MiCA’s transparency, custody, and reporting standards. This proactive stance positions Solana as a partner rather than a disruptor, easing institutional adoption. Under MiCA, stablecoins like USDC and USDT face stringent reserve and audit rules. Solana’s blockchain, known for its speed, can facilitate real-time reporting and auditing, reducing compliance costs. The SRI will showcase these capabilities through pilot projects with European banks. Early adopters include a Swiss private bank testing tokenized securities on Solana, as reported by local media. Comparing MiCA and the U.S. GENIUS Bill The U.S. GENIUS stablecoin bill, introduced in early 2025, shares similarities with MiCA but differs in scope. Both require stablecoin issuers to hold high-quality reserves and undergo regular audits. However, MiCA is broader, covering all crypto assets, while GENIUS focuses solely on stablecoins. Solana’s SRI will provide comparative analyses to help firms operating in both regions. This dual focus enhances its value proposition for multinational corporations. Table: Key Differences Between MiCA and GENIUS Bill Feature MiCA (EU) GENIUS Bill (U.S.) Scope All crypto assets Stablecoins only Reserve Requirements 100% reserve, segregated 100% reserve, audited quarterly Issuer Licensing EU-wide passport State-level registration Effective Date 2024 (phased) Proposed 2026 Solana’s Strategic Positioning in Europe’s Institutional Market Europe’s institutional finance sector, managing over $30 trillion in assets, demands robust infrastructure. Solana’s blockchain offers 400-millisecond block times and fees under $0.01, making it attractive for high-frequency trading and settlement. The SRI will demonstrate these advantages through live demos and case studies. For example, a Dutch pension fund is exploring Solana for real-time portfolio rebalancing, cutting costs by 60% compared to traditional systems. The institute’s location in Switzerland also provides access to the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). FINMA’s progressive stance on blockchain projects reduces regulatory uncertainty. Solana’s team includes former FINMA officials, adding credibility. This expertise helps firms avoid common pitfalls, such as misclassifying tokens or failing to meet anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Real-World Impact: Case Studies and Timelines Since its announcement in March 2025, the SRI has already onboarded three pilot partners. A French asset manager is testing tokenized real estate funds on Solana, targeting a 2026 launch. A German fintech startup uses the institute’s compliance toolkit to prepare for MiCA audits. These projects highlight the SRI’s practical value, moving beyond theory into execution. Timeline of Solana’s European Expansion: 2023: Solana Foundation opens a liaison office in Geneva. 2024: Partnership with Swisscom to develop blockchain solutions. March 2025: Solana Research Institute officially launches in Zurich. Q3 2025: First compliance workshops for European banks. 2026: Planned rollout of MiCA-compliant tokenization platform. Expert Insights and Industry Reactions Industry analysts view the SRI as a smart move. Dr. Elena Mueller, a blockchain regulation expert at the University of Zurich, states, ‘Solana’s institute fills a critical gap between technology and law. Many firms want to adopt blockchain but lack the regulatory roadmap.’ Similarly, a spokesperson for the European Blockchain Observatory notes, ‘This initiative aligns with the EU’s goal of fostering innovation within a safe framework.’ However, challenges remain. Solana’s network faced outages in 2022, raising reliability concerns. The SRI addresses this by offering technical audits to ensure enterprise-grade stability. Additionally, competition from Ethereum’s institutional push, via the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, pressures Solana to differentiate. The SRI’s focus on MiCA compliance gives it a unique edge. Conclusion The Solana Research Institute in Switzerland represents a decisive step toward capturing Europe’s institutional finance market. By aligning with MiCA regulations and offering practical compliance tools, Solana positions itself as a trusted partner for enterprises. The institute’s work will likely accelerate blockchain adoption across the region, setting a precedent for other networks. As regulations tighten globally, such initiatives become essential for mainstream integration. FAQs Q1: What is the Solana Research Institute (SRI)? The SRI is a new research facility based in Switzerland, launched by Solana to help companies evaluate and adopt public blockchains under evolving regulations like MiCA. Q2: Why did Solana choose Switzerland for its institute? Switzerland offers a progressive regulatory environment, access to FINMA, and a established blockchain ecosystem in ‘Crypto Valley,’ making it ideal for institutional-focused initiatives. Q3: How does the SRI help with MiCA compliance? The institute provides compliance workshops, technical audits, and research papers to guide firms through MiCA’s transparency, custody, and reporting requirements. Q4: What is the GENIUS stablecoin bill, and how does it relate? The GENIUS bill is a U.S. proposal for stablecoin regulation. The SRI offers comparative analyses between MiCA and GENIUS to help firms operating in both jurisdictions. Q5: When will the SRI’s first projects go live? Pilot projects are underway, with tokenized real estate funds and compliance toolkits expected to launch in 2026, pending regulatory approvals. This post Solana Research Institute Launches in Switzerland to Unlock Europe’s Institutional Finance Market first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
30 Apr 2026, 13:17
Wasabi Protocol 4.55M$ Hack: DeFi Crisis Deepens
Wasabi Protocol hit by 4.55M$ hack; vaults drained via UUPS. DeFi crisis deepens with Drift similarity and delisting news. ETH at 2,266$ support, multisig essential. Users should revoke LP approval...
30 Apr 2026, 12:55
Wasabi Hack: ZachXBT Exposes Critical Security Flaws and Alleged Waste on Influencers After $5.5M Breach
BitcoinWorld Wasabi Hack: ZachXBT Exposes Critical Security Flaws and Alleged Waste on Influencers After $5.5M Breach The cryptocurrency community faces fresh turmoil as on-chain analyst ZachXBT publicly condemns the security architecture of memecoin leverage trading protocol Wasabi. This criticism follows a devastating hack that drained approximately $5.5 million from the platform. ZachXBT specifically questioned why a single Externally Owned Account (EOA) held such extensive authority without implementing basic security safeguards. Furthermore, he alleged that project funds were misappropriated for influencer marketing, including payments to prominent key opinion leader (KOL) Kook. Wasabi Hack Details and Immediate Fallout The incident first came to light through a disclosure from Web3 security firm CertiK. Their alert triggered immediate concern across the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. Wasabi, a protocol designed for leveraged trading of memecoins, quickly acknowledged the issue on social media platform X. The team urged users to cease all interactions with its smart contracts until further notice. This precautionary measure aims to prevent further exploitation while the investigation continues. The estimated losses, confirmed by multiple sources, stand at roughly $5.5 million. This sum represents a significant portion of the protocol’s total value locked (TVL), raising questions about its long-term viability. ZachXBT’s Security Critique: A Single Point of Failure ZachXBT, a respected figure in blockchain forensics, directed sharp criticism at Wasabi’s core security design. He highlighted the reliance on a single Externally Owned Account (EOA) for critical administrative functions. In decentralized systems, EOAs are user-controlled wallets, not smart contracts. Granting such an account unilateral power over protocol operations creates a dangerous single point of failure. This design choice contradicts the fundamental principles of decentralization and multi-signature security. Industry best practices mandate using multi-signature wallets or decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) for key management. The lack of these safeguards, according to ZachXBT, made the protocol an attractive target for attackers. He argued that basic security measures could have prevented the entire incident. The Role of Multi-Signature Wallets Multi-signature wallets require multiple private keys to authorize a transaction. This mechanism distributes trust and significantly reduces the risk of a single compromised key leading to a catastrophic loss. Many DeFi protocols have adopted this standard after learning from past hacks. Wasabi’s apparent failure to implement such a system represents a major oversight. The community now debates whether this was a simple mistake or a sign of deeper operational weaknesses. This event serves as a stark reminder for all projects to prioritize security architecture from day one. Allegations of Wasted Funds on Influencer Marketing Beyond the security flaws, ZachXBT leveled serious allegations regarding the project’s financial management. He claimed that a substantial portion of project funds was spent on influencer marketing campaigns. Specifically, he mentioned payments to a KOL known as Kook. This accusation touches on a sensitive topic in the crypto space: the effectiveness and ethics of paying influencers to promote projects. Critics argue that such spending often inflates token prices artificially without building real value. It also diverts funds from essential areas like development and security. If true, these allegations paint a picture of a project that prioritized hype over substance. The community now demands transparency regarding Wasabi’s treasury and spending history. Impact on Investor Trust The combination of a major hack and alleged financial mismanagement has severely damaged investor confidence. Many users who trusted the protocol with their funds now face significant losses. The revelation that money might have been spent on influencers rather than security audits compounds their frustration. This incident highlights the risks associated with investing in unaudited or poorly secured DeFi projects. It also underscores the importance of due diligence before committing capital to any new protocol. The crypto market remains highly volatile, and security breaches like this one can wipe out entire portfolios in minutes. Timeline of the Wasabi Incident Understanding the sequence of events helps clarify the severity of the situation. The hack likely occurred over a short period, exploiting the EOA’s elevated permissions. CertiK’s detection system flagged the suspicious transactions almost immediately. Their public alert served as a crucial early warning for the broader community. Wasabi’s response, while prompt, came after the damage was already done. The team’s decision to pause all contract interactions was a necessary but reactive measure. This timeline reveals a pattern of detection after exploitation, rather than prevention. Proactive security measures, such as real-time monitoring and circuit breakers, could have changed the outcome. Broader Implications for Memecoin Leverage Trading The Wasabi hack raises important questions about the entire memecoin leverage trading sector. These protocols allow users to trade volatile memecoins with borrowed capital, amplifying both gains and losses. The high-risk nature of these assets makes security even more critical. A single exploit can trigger cascading liquidations and widespread market disruption. Regulators and industry watchdogs are likely to take note of this incident. It may prompt calls for stricter oversight of such platforms. For now, the incident serves as a cautionary tale for traders seeking high returns through leverage. The promise of quick profits must always be weighed against the potential for total loss. Comparison with Other Recent DeFi Hacks This event is not an isolated one. The DeFi space has seen numerous high-profile hacks in recent years. Projects like Wormhole, Ronin Network, and Poly Network suffered losses exceeding hundreds of millions of dollars. Common threads in these incidents include compromised private keys, smart contract bugs, and governance attacks. Wasabi’s case shares the key vulnerability of centralized control. Each hack reinforces the need for continuous security innovation. The industry must move beyond reactive measures and adopt a culture of proactive risk management. Security audits, bug bounties, and formal verification processes are no longer optional—they are essential. Protocol Loss (USD) Primary Vulnerability Year Wasabi $5.5 million Single EOA Authority 2025 Wormhole $326 million Smart Contract Exploit 2022 Ronin Network $540 million Compromised Private Keys 2022 Poly Network $611 million Contract Vulnerability 2021 Lessons for the Crypto Community The Wasabi hack offers several critical lessons for developers, investors, and users alike. First, security must be a foundational priority, not an afterthought. Projects should implement multi-signature controls, conduct regular audits, and establish emergency response plans. Second, transparency in financial management builds trust. Investors deserve clear information about how funds are allocated, including marketing budgets. Third, the role of influencers in crypto requires careful scrutiny. Users should question the motives behind promotional content and seek independent verification. Finally, the community must continue to support on-chain analysts like ZachXBT. Their work provides an essential layer of accountability in a largely unregulated space. Conclusion The Wasabi hack, now estimated at $5.5 million, exposes critical vulnerabilities in memecoin leverage trading protocols. ZachXBT’s security critique highlights the dangers of centralized control through a single Externally Owned Account. The allegations of wasted funds on influencer marketing further erode trust in the project’s management. This incident serves as a powerful reminder that robust security architecture and transparent financial practices are non-negotiable in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. As the investigation continues, the community watches closely to see how Wasabi responds and what broader changes may follow. The future of leveraged memecoin trading may depend on the lessons learned from this costly breach. FAQs Q1: What exactly happened in the Wasabi hack? A1: An attacker exploited a security vulnerability in the Wasabi protocol, draining approximately $5.5 million. The vulnerability involved a single Externally Owned Account (EOA) with excessive authority, which lacked basic multi-signature safeguards. Q2: Who is ZachXBT and why is his criticism important? A2: ZachXBT is a well-known on-chain analyst and blockchain investigator. His critiques carry significant weight in the crypto community because of his proven track record in identifying scams and security flaws. His analysis of the Wasabi hack has brought widespread attention to the protocol’s failures. Q3: What is a memecoin leverage trading protocol? A3: A memecoin leverage trading protocol allows users to trade volatile, often community-driven cryptocurrencies (memecoins) using borrowed funds. This amplifies potential profits but also increases the risk of significant losses. Security is especially critical in these high-risk environments. Q4: How can investors protect themselves from similar hacks? A4: Investors should research a project’s security measures before investing. Look for multi-signature wallets, regular security audits, and a transparent team. Avoid protocols with centralized control points. Diversifying investments and only risking capital you can afford to lose are also wise strategies. Q5: What are the allegations regarding influencer marketing? A5: ZachXBT alleged that Wasabi spent project funds on paying influencers, specifically mentioning KOL Kook, to promote the protocol. This is criticized as a misuse of funds that should have been allocated to security and development, potentially misleading investors. Q6: What is a single Externally Owned Account (EOA) vulnerability? A6: An EOA is a standard user-controlled wallet. When a protocol grants a single EOA critical administrative powers, it creates a single point of failure. If that wallet is compromised, the attacker gains full control. Using a multi-signature wallet, which requires multiple keys to authorize actions, prevents this vulnerability. This post Wasabi Hack: ZachXBT Exposes Critical Security Flaws and Alleged Waste on Influencers After $5.5M Breach first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
30 Apr 2026, 12:45
Trump‑backed WLFI price slumps further amid vote to unlock 62B tokens
World Liberty Financial’s token WLFI has deepened its decline, trading to below $0.06 amid an 18% drop in 24 hours as a governance proposal to unlock 62.28 billion WLFI tokens passes overwhelmingly. The result has intensified sell‑off pressure, with market sentiment souring over perceived insider‑friendly mechanisms and looming overhang from the newly structured vesting schedule. WLFI price chart from CoinMarketCap WLFI vote to unlock 62 billion tokens passes On‑chain data show the governance proposal to restructure 62.28 billion locked WLFI tokens has all but passed. While the voting period ends on May 6, 2026, details indicate backers have a 99.4% approval, with strong support from a concentrated group of large holders. The proposal itself targets all tokens held by founders, team members, advisors, and partners, a total of 45,238,585,647 WLFI. If passed, the move will allow these holders the option to either accept less favourable unlock terms or keep their balances locked indefinitely. Under the approved framework, 10% of the affected allocation, about 4,523,858,565 WLFI, is slated to be permanently burned and removed from the total supply upon passage. The remaining 90%, or 40,714,727,082 WLFI, is placed on a strict vesting path: a two‑year cliff followed by a three‑year linear release, with no unlocks beginning before year two and full distribution only by year five. Community sentiment extremely low Despite the planned burn, traders are focusing on the sheer scale of newly schedulable tokens, which they view as a latent source of dilution once the cliffs expire. Community sentiment is thus sharply negative, with many retail participants arguing that the voting power is concentrated in a small circle of insiders. On‑chain analytics from the latest poll indicate that the largest wallet controlled nearly 13% of votes cast, while the top four together accounted for roughly 40% of total voting power, leaving smaller holders with limited influence over the outcome. Is the WLFI price set for a new all-time low? WLFI has shed close to 88% of its value since its $0.46 peak in September 2025, with the token hovering at a new all-time low of $0.059 on April 30, 2026. The sharp 18% slide in the past 24 hours, triggered by broader market woes and the 62.28‑billion‑token unlock vote, has reinforced fears that WLFI could face prolonged downward pressure. Largely, this is down to concerns that if large holders begin to offload once vesting schedules take effect, sell-off pressure could be massive. Currently, headwinds extend beyond World Liberty Financial’s internal governance. The Trump-backed project has come under scrutiny for reportedly using WLFI tokens as collateral on the lending protocol Dolomite to borrow roughly $75 million in stablecoins. Tron founder Justin Sun, once a prominent backer, has publicly accused the project and filed a lawsuit. While the 10% burn of insiders’ locked tokens theoretically tightens supply, the market is currently pricing in liquidity overhang and broader macro uncertainty. WLFI fell from highs of $0.08 this week and could face further downside if the price dips to $0.05 or lower. The post Trump‑backed WLFI price slumps further amid vote to unlock 62B tokens appeared first on Invezz
30 Apr 2026, 12:35
USDT Bribery Scandal: Senior Chongqing Officials Investigated for Cryptocurrency Money Laundering
BitcoinWorld USDT Bribery Scandal: Senior Chongqing Officials Investigated for Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Two senior officials in Chongqing, China, face a formal investigation for alleged bribery and money laundering involving USDT. This case marks a significant escalation in China’s crackdown on cryptocurrency-related corruption. Authorities seized a cold wallet during the probe, tracing funds that reveal a complex web of illicit transactions. USDT Bribery Case Unfolds in Chongqing According to Foresight News, a businessman delivered 30.8 million USDT (approximately $30.8 million) to the city’s mayor. Investigators traced the funds to a cold wallet, discovering an additional 15.5 million USDT (approximately $15.5 million) sent to another high-ranking official. The head of a local law firm has also been arrested. Sources suggest this individual may be a key figure who helped launder the funds under the guise of legal fees. Timeline of Events Initial Transfer: A businessman transferred 30.8 million USDT to the mayor. Secondary Transfer: Authorities traced 15.5 million USDT to a second official. Seizure: Law enforcement seized a cold wallet containing evidence. Arrest: The head of a local law firm was arrested for alleged money laundering. How USDT Facilitates Money Laundering USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, offers pseudonymity and easy cross-border movement. Criminals often use it to bypass traditional banking scrutiny. In this case, the officials allegedly used USDT to receive bribes, then converted the funds through legal fees. This method exploits gaps in financial oversight. Comparison of Traditional vs. Crypto Bribery Method Traditional Bribery USDT Bribery Transaction Visibility Bank records Blockchain ledger (pseudonymous) Cross-Border Speed Days Minutes Detection Difficulty Moderate High (requires blockchain analysis) China’s Crackdown on Crypto Corruption China has banned cryptocurrency trading since 2021, but USDT remains in use for illicit purposes. This investigation aligns with a broader government campaign against corruption using digital assets. Experts note that blockchain’s transparency paradoxically helps authorities trace funds, as seen in this case. Legal Ramifications for Officials Under Chinese law, bribery and money laundering carry severe penalties, including life imprisonment. The use of USDT may lead to additional charges under anti-money laundering regulations. The arrested law firm head faces charges for facilitating the scheme. Impact on Cryptocurrency Regulation This case could prompt stricter oversight of stablecoins globally. Regulators in other countries may adopt similar blockchain tracing methods. The investigation also highlights the need for better training for law enforcement in crypto forensics. Expert Analysis Financial crime experts emphasize that USDT’s design makes it a double-edged sword. While it enables fast, low-cost transfers, its public ledger leaves a trail. Authorities in this case used that trail to connect the cold wallet to the officials. Conclusion The investigation into senior Chongqing officials for USDT bribery and money laundering underscores the growing intersection of cryptocurrency and corruption. This case demonstrates how blockchain technology can both enable and expose illicit financial flows. As regulators worldwide watch closely, the outcome may shape future anti-money laundering policies for digital assets. FAQs Q1: What is USDT and why is it used in bribery? USDT is a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, offering fast, pseudonymous transactions. Criminals use it to avoid traditional banking oversight. Q2: How did authorities trace the USDT funds? Investigators seized a cold wallet and analyzed the blockchain ledger, which records all transactions publicly. They traced the funds to the officials’ wallets. Q3: What are the penalties for USDT bribery in China? Penalties include life imprisonment for bribery and additional charges for money laundering under Chinese law. Q4: Can USDT transactions be completely anonymous? No. While USDT offers pseudonymity, all transactions are recorded on the blockchain, allowing authorities to trace funds with the right tools. Q5: Will this case affect global cryptocurrency regulation? Yes. This high-profile case may encourage other countries to adopt stricter stablecoin regulations and invest in blockchain forensics. This post USDT Bribery Scandal: Senior Chongqing Officials Investigated for Cryptocurrency Money Laundering first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
