Invest ideasNews
24 Mar 2026, 11:30
Ethereum Unveils Post-Quantum Security Roadmap For Institutions
Ethereum is beginning to formalize its post-quantum security push in public. ETH Foundation researcher Will Corcoran used a presentation at the Institutional Ethereum Forum in New York to lay out both the threat model and the protocol work already underway. The effort matters well beyond ETH, he argued, because the core bottleneck is not unique to one chain: every proof-of-stake network built on today’s cryptographic assumptions will eventually face the same scaling problem. Alongside the talk, the Ethereum Foundation launched pq.ethereum.org, a new portal that packages the project’s roadmap, technical resources, FAQs for institutions, and a registration form for a post-quantum retreat in Cambridge in October 2026. Corcoran framed the site as a way to consolidate years of research and answer what he described as growing inbound interest from institutions asking how Ethereum plans to prepare for a future in which quantum computers can break elliptic-curve cryptography. Ethereum Eyes Post-Quantum Industry Standard That future is still projected to be years away, but Corcoran said Ethereum is already working against a tight window. He pointed to current estimates for “ Q-Day ”: the arrival of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer, clustering around 2032, while the current roadmap targets key post-quantum components for the protocol’s “L” or “M” fork, roughly around 2029. The presentation ’s core argument was that post-quantum security cannot be reduced to a simple signature swap. Ethereum today relies on elliptic-curve cryptography across the stack: validator attestations at the consensus layer, blob proof data at the data layer, and transaction and wallet signatures at the execution layer. If that cryptography is broken, large parts of the network’s security model break with it. But replacing it introduces a second-order problem. Ethereum’s current BLS signatures are compact and aggregate extremely efficiently: 10,000 signatures still compress to 96 bytes. The proposed post-quantum replacement, a hash-based scheme Corcoran called Lean Sig, is around 3,000 bytes per signature, and naively aggregating them would produce roughly 30 megabytes of data per slot. That tradeoff is not merely an engineering inconvenience. Corcoran repeatedly tied it back to Ethereum’s decentralization constraint, arguing that bigger signatures would raise bandwidth requirements, reduce the number of viable home validators, and weaken the chain’s security properties. In his telling, the entire design challenge is downstream from that point. “So making Ethereum post quantum secure isn’t just as simple as swapping out the signature schemes because that one change cascades through everything else,” he said. “Bigger signatures would result in more bandwidth that would result in fewer home validators, less decentralization, and weaker security guarantees. So that one change cascades through everything.” Ethereum’s proposed answer is a pairing of LeanSig with a proving system called Lean Multisig, which Corcoran described as a STARK-based aggregation engine. Instead of forwarding all of the signatures directly, the system aims to prove that they were verified correctly and compress the output to around 125 kilobytes. He called that roughly 250x compression “the moon math” that makes post-quantum consensus viable on Ethereum. Corcoran also used the talk to stress that this is no longer a purely theoretical research thread. He said Ethereum is already running devnets with 10 client teams, has shipped four devnets so far, and is building around three-slot finality and four-second slots as a design basis. The broader effort , he added, spans more than eight years of research, about $25 million in funding, and roughly 1,500 contributors across more than 250 organizations and teams. For Ethereum, the immediate message is that post-quantum readiness is becoming a visible part of its long-range protocol agenda. For the rest of crypto, Corcoran’s claim was broader. “Really, every proof of stake blockchain faces the same challenge, and that challenge is the ability to aggregate at scale hash based signatures. It’s nonnegotiable,” he said. “When we succeed in shipping LeanSig and LeanMultisig and Lean consensus, we think that this could really become the de facto industry standard.” At press time, ETH traded at $2,154.
24 Mar 2026, 11:05
Global XRP Accumulation Is Happening. Here’s the Latest
A quiet shift is unfolding in the XRP market, and it is not immediately visible in price charts. While many retail participants focus on short-term fluctuations, deeper market signals suggest that a more strategic phase is already underway. Beneath the surface, capital appears to be rotating with precision, hinting at a buildup that could define XRP’s next major move. According to crypto analyst John Squire, recent data reveals a pattern of XRP accumulation occurring across multiple regions. His analysis, supported by visual mapping and blockchain data, points to a coordinated effort by large players who are steadily increasing their exposure without drawing excessive attention. Whale Accumulation Accelerates in March On-chain metrics show that large XRP holders significantly increased their positions in early March 2026. Whale wallets collectively acquired approximately 110 million XRP, valued at around $152 million, within a short timeframe. These entities typically operate with long-term strategies, and their behavior often reflects calculated positioning rather than reactive trading. GLOBAL XRP ACCUMULATION IS HAPPENING The world is quietly loading up on $XRP right now. You can see it across the map. This isn’t hype… it’s movement. Smart money is positioning. Are you watching or missing it? pic.twitter.com/SbDbupBKWp — John Squire (@TheCryptoSquire) March 23, 2026 This level of accumulation carries weight because it signals confidence from capital-heavy participants. Whales tend to accumulate during periods of low volatility, where they can enter positions efficiently without causing major price disruptions. Global Activity Signals Expanding Interest The accumulation trend is not limited to a single region. Data indicate that buying activity spans multiple regions, reinforcing XRP’s growing relevance in global financial discussions. This geographic dispersion suggests that interest in XRP extends beyond speculative trading and increasingly aligns with its utility in cross-border transactions . As financial institutions continue to explore blockchain-based solutions, XRP remains positioned as a viable asset for liquidity and settlement. This broader adoption narrative adds another layer of significance to the current accumulation trend. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Price Structure Supports Accumulation Thesis XRP’s recent price behavior aligns with classic accumulation patterns. The asset continues to form higher lows, indicating sustained demand even as it faces resistance levels. Buyers consistently step in during dips, absorbing sell pressure and stabilizing the market. This controlled price action often reflects a transfer of tokens from short-term traders to long-term holders. Instead of sharp upward spikes, the market shows measured consolidation, which typically precedes stronger directional moves. A Strategic Phase, Not Market Noise The current XRP landscape reflects intention rather than randomness. Whale accumulation , global participation, and steady price structure all point to a market in preparation mode. While no indicator guarantees future performance, the alignment of these factors suggests that XRP may be entering a critical phase. Market participants now face a clear choice: observe the shift from the sidelines or recognize the signals early and act with informed conviction. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Global XRP Accumulation Is Happening. Here’s the Latest appeared first on Times Tabloid .
24 Mar 2026, 10:59
Mochi Finance founder Azeem Ahmed sells 550,000 CVX from $54M rug pull proceeds as fraud allegations span four DeFi projects
Azeem Ahmed, the founder of Mochi Finance and its USDM stablecoin, and a figure linked to fraud allegations across at least four decentralized finance projects since 2020, sold approximately 550,285 CVX tokens on March 19, 2026 through a wallet that blockchain analysts have publicly associated with the Mochi protocol since the November 2021 Curve Finance pool drain that triggered one of only a handful of emergency DAO interventions in Curve’s history. The sale, executed at an average price of $1.72 per token, netted approximately $946,000 and caused the CVX price to drop more than 10%, from $1.88 to $1.68, according to on-chain data reviewed by Crypto Daily. The proceeds were routed to a multisig wallet associated with the Mochi protocol, which held approximately $864,858 in total assets as of the evening of March 19, according to portfolio tracker DeBank. An additional 500,000 CVX remain in a locked position on Convex Finance. A hardcoded oracle, 10 billion worthless tokens, and a $46 million Curve pool drain The CVX tokens at the center of the dispute trace back to November 11, 2021. According to blockchain records and certified crypto trace reports prepared by forensics firm IFW Global, a wallet associated with Mochi Finance swapped 10 billion MOCHI tokens, the protocol’s governance token, which had been assigned a hardcoded price in the protocol’s oracle system regardless of its near-zero market value, for approximately 46 million USDM, the Mochi stablecoin. The USDM was immediately swapped for 46,004,689.94 DAI through the Curve USDM/3CRV pool, effectively draining it of real stablecoin liquidity. Liquidity providers who had deposited DAI, USDC, and USDT found their holdings replaced with USDM that subsequently lost its peg. The DAI was then converted through ZeroEx and SushiSwap into approximately 9,876 ETH and used to purchase 1,050,285 CVX tokens, which were locked on Convex Finance. The Curve Finance Emergency DAO responded by killing the USDM rewards gauge. CoinDesk covered the incident under the headline “Curve Wars Heat Up: Emergency DAO Invoked After ‘Clear Governance Attack.’” Yearn Finance founder Andre Cronje stated publicly that Mochi had become 65% undercollateralized. When Crypto Briefing asked Ahmed for comment at the time, he described his actions as a “bold approach to gaining voting power in the DAO” and characterized himself as “a small player on the outskirts” whom the “DeFi Cartel” felt threatened by. IFW Global’s certified reports document individual investor losses of $4.87 million and $3.35 million respectively. Both investors filed sworn affidavits. Aggregate losses across all affected liquidity providers are estimated at over $54 million. Dedaub audit flagged the exact vulnerability five months before the exploit Before Mochi Finance launched, Ahmed commissioned a smart contract audit from Dedaub, a blockchain security firm. The June 2021 report identified two critical and five high-severity vulnerabilities in the protocol’s code. One of the high-severity findings, labeled H5, flagged that sensitive functions in the OracleRouter.sol contract lacked access controls. The finding was marked “Open,” meaning it had not been resolved at the time the report was issued. The OracleRouter is the component responsible for determining what tokens can serve as collateral and at what price, the same mechanism that investors allege was exploited five months later to assign an artificial value to the MOCHI token and mint $46 million in unbacked stablecoins. Four years of extraction: escalating fees, diverted rewards, and drained liquidity pools Following the Curve pool drain, Ahmed did not disappear. He rebranded through a new entity called GaiaDAO and introduced the “Peg Rebalancing Module” (PBM), which was marketed as a mechanism to distribute CVX staking rewards to USDM holders and gradually restore the stablecoin’s peg. The PBM carried a 2% management fee and a 20% performance fee, both payable to Ahmed. According to a Curve governance forum thread titled “How to Help USDM — Mochi ‘Slow Rug’ Victims,” Ahmed subsequently raised the performance fee to 50% without prior notice, reverting to 20% only after community objections. The thread documented the frustrations of users who found themselves paying the person who had drained them for the privilege of partial restitution. By November 2025, even that arrangement ended. On-chain records show that all staking reward distributions from the 1,050,285 vlCVX position ceased entirely. Transaction data indicates the rewards were instead routed to a wallet that also serves as a signer on the multisig holding the CVX — a wallet multiple blockchain analysts identify as Ahmed’s personal address. The estimated value of diverted staking rewards exceeds $1.6 million. Separately, approximately 2,198 ETH, worth roughly $6.67 million at the time, and $471,429 in USDC were allegedly taken from Mochi/ETH liquidity pools and never returned to depositors. Airdrop allocations from protocols including Prisma, CNC, VELO, LFT, and YB were also reportedly never distributed to token holders. GaiaDAO’s reward claim functions have been non-functional since December 2023. A pattern of ventures: $SAFE, Armor.fi, Mochi, and GaiaDAO Public records and statements from former associates indicate the Mochi incident is not the first time Ahmed has faced allegations of fund misappropriation in the decentralized finance sector. The pattern spans at least four projects since 2020. Ahmed’s earliest documented involvement was with Yieldfarming.insure ($SAFE). A 2020 Decrypt article profiled Ahmed as a DeFi investor who advised being “greedy in private.” Former participants have alleged he leveraged insider access to front-run staking rewards and extract value from Balancer pools. Ahmed subsequently co-founded Armor.fi, a DeFi insurance protocol built on Nexus Mutual cover contracts, with Robert Forster and Corey Jackson. In November 2021, Forster took to X (formerly Twitter) and publicly accused Ahmed of stealing “millions in LP tokens” from the project and seizing control of its social channels. “I was mass mass liquidated and he got control of the socials and channels,” Forster wrote in a thread that detailed what he described as a pattern of deception and fund misappropriation. GaiaDAO, the entity Ahmed created ostensibly to compensate USDM holders through the PBM, has itself become a vehicle for further alleged extraction, as detailed above. Prior litigation: Chen v. Ahmed and the forced settlement Ahmed’s involvement in prior legal proceedings provides additional context. In February 2021, an Armor.fi protocol user named David Chen filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court (Case No. CGC-21-589609) alleging Ahmed attempted to misappropriate $1.6 million related to a Nexus Mutual insurance payout of 1,000 ETH. Court records show Chen’s attorney, Ryan Abbott of Brown, Neri, Smith & Khan LLP, moved rapidly: demand letter on February 7, complaint filed on February 12, and an application for a temporary restraining order on February 17. The TRO sought to freeze 1,000 ETH and prevent Ahmed from transferring, exchanging, or reducing the accessibility of the tokens. After losing at a preliminary hearing, Ahmed’s side was forced into an out-of-court settlement. Terms were not disclosed. Within months, Ahmed launched Mochi Finance. The March 19 sell-off and wallet forensics The CVX sell-off on March 19 was first flagged by blockchain watchers monitoring the Mochi-linked wallets. Ahmed’s primary signer wallet (0xf6c40c4391d6570032d2eb7a9cd9935898c430cf) executed a series of transactions liquidating approximately 550,285 CVX tokens. The proceeds, denominated in DAI, were transferred to the Mochi protocol multisig (0x597f540bb63381ffa267027d2d479984825057a8). The remaining 500,000 CVX tokens are in a locked position on Convex Finance. Community members tracking the wallets have expressed concern that Ahmed may attempt to sell the locked tokens through intermediary wallets upon unlock — selling first, buying back through fresh wallets, and re-locking to break the chain of on-chain evidence. The sell-off represents the most overt action Ahmed has taken since the original November 2021 drain. For years, the debate in the DeFi community was whether Mochi constituted a governance attack gone wrong or a deliberate theft. The decision to sell the tokens, rather than return them, redistribute them, or burn them, is being interpreted by affected investors as the definitive answer to that question. Ahmed’s current status and silence Court filings describe Ahmed as a UK citizen. His social media accounts have been inactive for months. The Mochi Finance and GaiaDAO websites remain online but have not been updated. The project’s Discord is largely abandoned. He has not publicly responded to Robert Forster’s accusations, the IFW Global investigation findings, the Curve governance forum discussions about his conduct. What the on-chain record documents is a developer who has been involved in at least four DeFi projects — $SAFE, Armor.fi, Mochi Finance, and GaiaDAO — each of which ended with allegations of fund misappropriation. In one case, he was sued and forced into a settlement. In another, his own co-founder accused him of theft on social media. In the largest, $46 million was drained from a Curve pool and the proceeds are now, four and a half years later, being sold. As of publication, 500,000 CVX tokens remain in the wallet Ahmed controls. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
24 Mar 2026, 10:54
SoCrazy ICO: Ushering in a New Era of Trustless Lotteries on Solana
By Marcus Hale, Blockchain Innovation Reporter March 24, 2026 The launch of the SoCrazy presale is generating waves in the decentralized finance community, spotlighting an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) that could redefine how we engage with online lotteries. Targeting a $3,500,000 raise, this ICO for the CRAZY token introduces a platform dedicated to scratch card games, all powered by Solana's efficient blockchain. With SolidProof's audit affirming its security protocols, SoCrazy is attracting investors who value transparency and innovation in GambleFi. Diving into the ICO Opportunity: The “Tokenomics” Structured to maximize early involvement, the presale unfolds in multiple phases with discounts starting at nearly 30% and gradually decreasing, averaging a solid 16.5% savings against the upcoming DEX listing at $0.0077 per token. This setup not only incentivizes prompt participation but also channels funds toward platform enhancements, including advanced security measures and developer integrations. A substantial chunk of the token supply (over two-thirds) is earmarked for presale buyers, with additional reserves for liquidity on exchanges, community rewards, and modest team allocations to ensure aligned growth. Spotlight on the SoCrazy Ecosystem SoCrazy's dApp brings scratch card lotteries into the Web3 age, where players use CRAZY tokens exclusively for entries. Forget the opacity of traditional setups; here, Solana's smart contracts handle randomness, verifications, and instant payouts without any central authority holding the reins. The non-custodial nature means your assets stay in your wallet, and pooled liquidity from stakers keeps the prize pots flowing. This utility token goes further, enabling governance votes and staking rewards, creating a vibrant loop that benefits active users. COMPARISON: How SoCrazy Stacks Up Against the Giants In the GambleFi arena, SoCrazy differentiates by honing in on lotteries rather than sprawling casino offerings. Platforms like Stake.com, a go-to for crypto bettors with its sports wagers and table games, still lean on centralized servers for core operations, demanding user trust despite blockchain integrations. SoCrazy, conversely, is purely on-chain, making every scratch verifiable and resistant to manipulation - a stark upgrade from Stake's licensed but operator-dependent model. Against Solana peers such as Rollbit or Duelbits, which emphasize high-roller casino vibes with slots and live dealers, SoCrazy's lottery focus caters to a broader, more casual crowd. It sidesteps the intense house edges of those competitors by fostering community-driven liquidity, and its modular framework invites devs to add features without rebuilding from scratch. This positions SoCrazy as a trailblazer in lottery-specific GambleFi, filling a void left by casino-heavy rivals. Charting the Path Ahead With the presale underway, SoCrazy eyes rapid dApp deployment, expanded game varieties, and ecosystem collaborations. As Solana surges in adoption for its speed and affordability, this project could draw in users frustrated with legacy lotteries' inefficiencies. For savvy investors, grabbing CRAZY now means backing a utility-rich token poised for real-world impact. Explore the official SoCrazy site to secure your spot in the ICO, link your wallet, and review the detailed whitepaper. In a sector ripe for disruption, SoCrazy's blend of fun and fairness might just hit the jackpot. >> Visit the official website here! Disclaimer: This is a sponsored article and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Crypto Daily, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.
24 Mar 2026, 10:38
BTQ Technologies: Strong Tech Stack, Empty Top Line
Summary BTQ Technologies is downgraded to Hold due to persistent pre-revenue status and accelerating capital commitments despite strong technical progress. BTQ's quantum-resistant blockchain, QSSN, IP licensing, and hardware initiatives show promise, but none have converted to material revenue or clear commercial traction. The cash position is materially tighter than it appears, with significant outflows pending for the ICTK agreement and QPerfect acquisition, raising dilution risk. BTQ's future hinges on the Bitcoin Quantum mainnet launch, customer revenue, and Bitcoin Core's adoption of its quantum standards—none of which are assured or imminent. I initiated coverage on BTQ Technologies ( BTQ ) a little over a year ago with a Hold rating, at the height of the quantum momentum in early 2025. BTQ had (and I believe still has) a tech stack that stood apart among quantum-focused companies. Most of the others are either advancing quantum features in semiconductors or building quantum computing hardware from scratch. SEALSQ Corp. ( LAES ) is building post-quantum cryptographic chips for IoT devices and secure elements, IonQ ( IONQ ) is building trapped-ion quantum computing hardware targeting enterprise and government compute workloads, Rigetti Computing ( RGTI ) is building full-stack superconducting quantum chips and cloud services, Quantum Computing Inc. ( QUBT ) is building quantum photonic chips and optimization software; while BTQ is building post-quantum cryptography defenses specifically for blockchain networks like Bitcoin ( BTC-USD ), and at the same time developing a hardware stack to go with it. Last September, I wrote a follow-up on BTQ in which I upgraded to a Buy on the Nasdaq uplisting. I based the thesis on the Nasdaq uplisting as a potential catalyst for institutional exposure and the company's first-mover positioning in post-quantum Bitcoin security potentially gaining the right attention through the uplisting. Since that call, BTQ is down ~65% (after surging over 100% to a six-month high of $14 in October) as the stock currently trades around $2.50 today. Seeking Alpha While updates from BTQ show that the development of its core tech products has been progressing well, I think the company's prolonged status as a pre-revenue company is making investors' patience (including mine) wear thin. Some of the companies I mentioned earlier were also pre-revenue when I first covered BTQ in January 2025, but several of them have since successfully shipped to market and established a clear revenue path. For context, for FY25, IonQ reported $130 million in revenue, a 202% increase YoY, thus becoming the first pure-play quantum company in history to cross the $100 million annual threshold, with roughly 60% of that from commercial customers. D-Wave closed FY25 with $24.6 million in revenue and recognized revenue from over 135 individual customers, including more than 70 commercial enterprises. Rigetti posted $7.1 million in FY25 revenue, which may be modest compared to IonQ or D-Wave, but it is backed by a confirmed C-DAC order and $589 million in cash and cash equivalents. QUBT generated $682k in FY25 revenue , also super modest, but it comes with a Fab 1 TFLN chip manufacturing facility now open in Tempe, Arizona, and $1.5 billion raised to fund the roadmap; the commercial infrastructure is already in place. I am downgrading BTQ to Hold. This is not a call on the technology itself. The latest update announced on Thursday, which was the launch of Bitcoin Quantum testnet v0.3.0, is the most substantive technical announcement BTQ has delivered in a while. But what I cannot get past is the gap between the pace of product development and the pace of commercial execution. I need to see evidence that the product pipeline is converting into something resembling a revenue model before considering upgrading back to a Buy. BTQ Testnet v0.3.0 and BIP-360 Last Thursday's launch of Bitcoin Quantum testnet v0.3.0 is an early implementation of BIP-360 's Pay-to-Merkle-Root [P2MR], a proposal that has now been merged into the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal repository. The BIP repository is the formal system where developers propose and track changes to the Bitcoin protocol. At a high level, BIP-360 builds on the direction introduced by the 2021 Bitcoin Taproot upgrade and aims to address Bitcoin's most pressing quantum vulnerability, which is quantum-vulnerable addresses. It is an attack vector where transactions on the Bitcoin network can be compromised using the public addresses to map to the private keys of wallet owners, made possible by quantum computing-capable computers. The proposed solution around this vulnerability is what this testnet stress-tests. For readers not versed in crypto terms, a testnet is a live but consequence-free environment where every component that will be in a live network is tested and vetted before the launch of the live network called the mainnet. BTQ's Bitcoin Quantum testnet is now in its fourth iteration, with over 50 miners and more than 100k blocks mined. A live block explorer and mining pool are also active on the Bitcoin Quantum network. This shows tangible progress at the protocol level. What has not changed, however, is the near-term financial picture, which is the main focus of this piece. Four Potential Business Lines But No Revenue BTQ Technologies has developed four concrete products around quantum so far, each of them distinct and robust enough individually to be standalone business lines for the company. The first is the Bitcoin Quantum blockchain network itself. It is a blockchain network built as a quantum-resistant fork of Bitcoin to tackle the public address vulnerability I mentioned earlier. The blockchain uses a new cryptographic signature scheme that replaces the ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm cryptographic method currently used to authorize Bitcoin transactions and verify wallet ownership) with NIST-standardized ML-DSA signatures (a post-quantum signature standard formally approved by the NIST , designed to remain secure against attacks from quantum computers). BTQ designed the network in a way that keeps the 21 million supply cap and proof-of-work mining structure of Bitcoin's original network. The second product is the Quantum Stablecoin Settlement Network [QSSN] . I believe this is the most commercially oriented part of the stack. QSSN is positioned as B2B infrastructure for banks, payment firms, and stablecoin issuers, with a focus on quantum-secure settlement rails. BTQ has presented architecture showing how this framework could support quantum-secure versions of tokenized deposits similar to those being explored by banks. The third is IP licensing. The QBits collaboration in Saudi Arabia is an early example of how BTQ's IP of quantum cryptographic standards can potentially become an off-the-shelf solution that institutions won't have to reinvent the wheel to implement certain quantum security infrastructure. The Saudi collaboration focused on quantum-secure custody and treasury infrastructure for Bitcoin and Ethereum ( ETH-USD ). This suggests a model where BTQ licenses post-quantum cryptographic designs and patents to external institutions and networks. I think this business line is more viable than relying on BTQ tokens achieving monetary value, which is super speculative, though revenue from licensing still depends on actual licensing uptake and enforceability of the IP. The fourth is CASH (Cryptographically Agile Secure Hardware). The technology in development comes from patents acquired from Radical Semiconductor and is designed as a compact post-quantum cryptography accelerator for low-power devices such as smart cards. A proof of concept and other CASH milestones are expected in H1 this year. Combined with a $15 million Development Service Agreement with ICTK Co., Ltd. last October, this pushes BTQ toward a hardware-rooted security model and potentially opens enterprise procurement opportunities beyond software-only quantum solutions. BTQ Token: Real Concept, Uncertain Value Bitcoin Quantum's mainnet launch is targeted for Q2 2026, going by the Bitcoin Quantum roadmap . Once the mainnet launches, BTQ tokens will transition from testnet assets (currently with no monetary value) to mainnet assets (which will be tradeable on crypto exchanges with real value). BTQ (the company) will have the capacity to accumulate tokens through direct mining and through its 3% pool fee (collected in BTQ tokens), with management projecting around 100k tokens on the balance sheet in the first twelve months of network operation. The projections are great and stand as potential revenue upside for BTQ (the company), but the truth is that at the moment all of this is pure speculation, as the value that the crypto market will assign to BTQ tokens will be entirely market-determined and cannot be projected with any form of certainty. There is even a deeper uncertainty surrounding the whole project and the token, which is that Bitcoin Quantum is not a Layer 2 being built on top of Bitcoin's mainnet. It is a fully standalone blockchain, a clean-slate network that starts from its own genesis block, runs its own proof-of-work, and carries no inherited Bitcoin balances. The closest parallel to what Bitcoin Quantum is to Bitcoin that I can think of is how Kusama ( KSM-USD ) and Polkadot ( DOT-USD ) interact. Kusama is the live, real-value "canary network" where Polkadot's architecture is tested before being deployed on the main chain. Bitcoin Quantum is being positioned in that same role for Bitcoin as a live quantum-resistant environment where post-quantum cryptography can be stress-tested at scale before Bitcoin Core ever considers adopting the post-quantum cryptographic standards at the protocol level. Though the Kusama-Polkadot analogy shows useful precedent on how the tech can translate from a canary network to a main chain, there is still another nuance in the comparison, and the Kusama-Polkadot parallel doesn't fully nail the dynamic between Bitcoin Quantum and Bitcoin as it stands. Kusama and Polkadot were built by the same team, with an explicit upgrade pipeline between them. Bitcoin Quantum is not being built by the Bitcoin Core developer community, and no such pipeline exists as of today. A May 2025 Chaincode Labs analysis found that all Bitcoin post-quantum initiatives remain at an early and exploratory stage, with Bitcoin Core having made minimal progress (you can find those details on Page 24, Post Quantum Bitcoin subsection, of that report). Bitcoin Core developers could ultimately choose a different post-quantum path entirely that has no connection to BIP-360 or anything that BTQ has built. If that happens, the Bitcoin Quantum network stands to lose its primary value proposition as the proven implementation of post-quantum Bitcoin security infrastructure. What is BTQ's Balance Sheet Looking Like? BTQ's Q3 2025 Interim Financial Report, which is the most recent filing, released last November, shows that BTQ closed Q3 with cash of C$39.4 million and working capital of C$38 million compared to C$9.3 million in cash as of year-end 2024. The improvement in cash is entirely attributable to last July's Prospectus Supplement offering , in which the company issued 5.55 million shares at $7.20 per share for gross proceeds of ~C$40 million. This same offering coincided with the Nasdaq uplisting and my Buy upgrade at the time. Net of a 7% agent's fee, which is C$2.8 million, and issuance costs, BTQ retained ~C$37.1 million. Operating activities consumed C$7.24 million over the nine months ended September 30 last year, which averages to ~C$2.4 million per quarter. Q3 alone carried a reported net loss of C$9.02 million, but C$4.51 million of that loss was due to non-cash share-based compensation. Shares outstanding as of the day the Q3 results were released stood at ~140 million, plus 2.83 million stock options and 3.1 million RSUs, which point to further dilution overhang. While the cash position looks formidable against what operating activities are consuming, the actual picture is materially tighter. The October 2025 ICTK agreement commits ~C$6.8 million (around $5 million) for the equity investment alone, plus up to $10 million in milestone-based development payments. The QPerfect acquisition, a French neutral atom quantum computing company based at the European Center for Quantum Science in Strasbourg (of which a €2 million minority stake is already paid), with the full €30 million acquisition pending regulatory approval, adds further committed outflows. Put these together, and you find that BTQ faces potential cash commitments well in excess of C$50 million against a current position of C$39.4 million. And it looks like another offering is not a question of if, but when and at what price. The revenue picture further confirms why patience is wearing thin. For the nine months ended September 30, BTQ saw C$315k in total revenue, but every dollar of it was drawn from a deferred balance established in a prior-period software license with ZKP Corp., a company controlled by a related party. By Q3 2025, that deferred balance fell to nil, as the filing shows. BTQ, in reality, generated zero revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2025. BTQ has never generated material revenue from actual customers in its history; the few hundred thousand generated have always been tied to a related party arrangement. And moving forward, I expect the Q4 report to either introduce the first of such revenue lines, ideally from QSSN pilot contracts, ICTK milestones, or IP licensing, or to confirm that the company remains at zero heading into a period when its committed capital obligations are accelerating. The Q4 report is going to be a binary outcome for investors. BTQ's minority equity stake in QPerfect SAS does not yet give BTQ significant influence over QPerfect until the option to acquire the remaining shares for €30 million in a combination of cash and common shares, subject to stock exchange approval and compliance with applicable securities and other laws, is approved. QPerfect's MIMIQ emulator achieved its first commercial deployment last month when it was integrated into SDT's QUREKA cloud platform, which is a genuine revenue-generating milestone for the underlying asset and will flow into BTQ's consolidated financials if the full acquisition goes through. That said, the QPerfect acquisition does not solve the near-term cash question. It even adds execution complexity at a moment when BTQ has yet to generate a single dollar of real revenue. Valuation and Risks BTQ is not amenable to a DCF or most multiples, as it is still basically prerevenue. There is no conventional numerator yet. A bet on BTQ at this juncture will be mainly based on the speculation that BTQ tokens achieve value after mainnet launches or QSSN converting institutional demonstration into signed contracts and IP licensing expanding beyond the QBits pilot. Trading around $2.50 with a market cap around $350 million, the market has repriced all three milestones much lower compared to market expectations last September around the Nasdaq uplisting. Since the September uplisting, BTQ has also been added to both the WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund ( WQTM ) in the U.S. and the VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF in Europe, which provide some institutional presence through regulated fund wrappers. This, however, has not been enough to hold the line near the price BTQ traded at around uplisting when I recommended a Buy. Risks surrounding BTQ include potential dilution, delays on milestones, and the fact that its blockchain quantum network getting adoption hinges on Bitcoin Core developers choosing the same post-quantum path and is at best an outcome entirely outside the company's control. Bitcoin Core adopting an alternative post-quantum standard would directly impair Bitcoin Quantum's value proposition. Mainnet delay beyond Q2 2026 will prolong the period in which the token treasury generates no monetizable value. With BTQ now carrying high commitments from the QPerfect acquisition, a potential secondary offering to fund the ICTK and QPerfect commitments at current prices would be highly dilutive. The offering in July at $7.20 already extracted significant value from buyers, and the stock has shed 65% since then. On the brighter side, any QSSN contract announcement, the first ICTK milestone payment received, or mainnet launch would each move me towards upgrading back to a Buy rating. Takeaway Since my Buy upgrade last September, BTQ's technical milestones have progressed well, with the quantum-resistant blockchain network testnet going live, and other product lines are taking shape, with the balance sheet better capitalized. But with no material revenue recorded yet, committed capital obligations that materially narrow the C$39.4 million cash position, and a crypto token whose value is entirely contingent on outcomes no one can predict, a Hold is the honest rating at this juncture. With the technical products being launched so far, BTQ's technical work earns genuine respect, but the state of financials and revenue visibility has not kept pace with that technical ambition. In the next financial report, I'll be watching for the first revenue from actual customers and not from a related party, reaffirmation that mainnet launch in Q2 2026 is still on track, and how the acquisition of the French quantum computing company is progressing.
24 Mar 2026, 10:35
Alchemy Pay price prediction 2026-2032: Is ACH a good investment?
Key takeaways: Alchemy Pay’s price can reach a maximum of $0.0427 and an average trading value of $0.0364 in 2026. The ACH could reach a maximum of $0.0611 and an average of $0.2037 by the end of 2029. Alchemy Pay price prediction for 2032 projects a maximum price of $0.2043 Alchemy Pay (ACH) is a cross-functional payment solution making significant strides in bridging the gap between fiat and cryptocurrency payment ecosystems. The platform’s robust framework enables global consumers to connect with merchants, developers, and institutions worldwide, facilitating transactions across multiple fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies. This functionality enhances Alchemy Pay’s adaptability and positions it as a pivotal player in the financial technology sector. Alchemy Pay’s inclusion in the decentralized platforms of popular projects like Augur, Cryptokitties, and OpenSea, along with its support for the infrastructure of Kyber and Radar Relay, adds layers of credibility and utility, enhancing its investment appeal. Can Alchemy Pay (ACH) get to $0.1? Will Alchemy Pay hit $1? Let’s find out in this ACH price prediction for 2026-2032. Overview Cryptocurrency Alchemy Pay Token ACH Price $0.006849 Market Cap $68.49 Trading Volume (24-hour) $5.67M Circulating Supply 10 Billion ACH All-time High $0.1975 Aug 06, 2021 All-time Low $0.001338 Jul 20, 2021 24-h High $0.006933 24-h Low $0.006491 Alchemy Pay price prediction: Technical analysis Price Prediction $ 0.007416 (10.53%) Price Volatility 3.17% (Medium) 50-Day SMA $ 0.007291 14-Day RSI 45.96 (Neutral) Market Sentiment Bearish Fear & Greed Index 11 (Extreme Fear) Green Days 13/30 (43%) 200-Day SMA $ 0.01227 Alchemy Pay price analysis TL;DR Breakdown: ACH is bouncing slightly from support after recent decline Price remains range bound with weak bullish momentum Resistance near $0.0070 limits upside unless broken ACH/USD 1-day chart ACHUSD chart by TradingView Alchemy Pay (ACH) on the daily chart on Mar 24 shows a range-bound structure with mild bearish pressure after failing to sustain a rally toward $0.0075. Price recently rejected higher levels and pulled back toward the $0.0066–$0.0068 zone, where it is now consolidating. Also, the formation of lower highs means a weakening bullish momentum, while support around $0.0064–$0.0066 continues to hold. Short-term candles indicate indecision, with neither buyers nor sellers in full control. A break above $0.0070 could revive bullish momentum, while a drop below $0.0064 may trigger further downside. Overall, ACH remains in sideways consolidation with a slight bearish bias. Alchemy Pay 4-hour price chart ACHUSD chart by TradingView On the 4-hour chart, Alchemy Pay (ACH) shows a short-term bearish trend following a sharp rejection near $0.0076. Price has been forming lower highs and lower lows, indicating sustained selling pressure. The recent drop toward the $0.0064–$0.0066 zone highlights a key support area, where a minor bounce is now visible. However, recovery attempts remain weak, suggesting limited bullish momentum. If ACH fails to reclaim the $0.0070 resistance, downside risk persists. A break below $0.0064 could extend losses, while consolidation above current levels may signal stabilization. Overall, momentum remains bearish with early signs of potential short-term consolidation. Alchemy Pay technical indicators: Levels and action Daily simple moving average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 0.007299 SELL SMA 5 $ 0.007028 SELL SMA 10 $ 0.006902 SELL SMA 21 $ 0.006908 SELL SMA 50 $ 0.007291 SELL SMA 100 $ 0.008529 SELL SMA 200 $ 0.01227 SELL Daily exponential moving average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $ 0.007122 SELL EMA 5 $ 0.007476 SELL EMA 10 $ 0.007984 SELL EMA 21 $ 0.008259 SELL EMA 50 $ 0.008942 SELL EMA 100 $ 0.01086 SELL EMA 200 $ 0.01420 SELL Alchemy Pay price analysis conclusion Alchemy Pay (ACH) remains in a consolidation phase with a slight bearish bias following recent rejection from higher levels. Both daily and 4-hour charts show weakening bullish momentum, with price struggling to sustain moves above key resistance near $0.0070–$0.0075. Support around $0.0064–$0.0066 is holding for now, preventing a sharper decline. The structure suggests indecision, with sellers still in control short term but buyers defending key levels. A breakout above resistance could shift momentum bullish, while a breakdown below support may trigger further downside. Overall, ACH is range-bound with cautious sentiment dominating the market. Is Alchemy Pay a good investment? Alchemy Pay (ACH) shows mixed signals as an investment. While the current bearish trend and volatility indicate short-term challenges, the solid market capitalization and consistent support levels suggest long-term potential. However, risk-averse investors may prefer to wait for clearer bullish signs or reduced volatility before considering investing in ACH. Why is ACH up today? Alchemy Pay (ACH) is up today (Mar 24) due to a short-term rebound from key support levels around $0.0064–$0.0066, where buyers stepped in after recent declines. The price action shows a technical recovery rather than strong bullish momentum, as oversold conditions on lower timeframes likely attracted dip buyers. Additionally, the crypto market stabilization may be supporting minor upside across altcoins. However, the move remains limited, with resistance near $0.0070 capping gains. The current rise reflects temporary relief buying and consolidation, not a confirmed trend reversal, as ACH still trades within a wider sideways range with cautious market sentiment. Will ACH recover? ACH may recover if bulls regain control and maintain support above critical levels. While the current outlook remains bearish, a breakout above short-term resistance levels and consistent buying activity could reverse the negative momentum and lead to a potential recovery in the market. Will ACH reach $0.05? ACH is expected to trade above the $0.0124 range throughout 2027, suggesting potential for significant price appreciation compared to earlier years. Will ACH reach $0.1? The price forecasts indicate that ACH could reach a maximum of $0.3667 by 2029. Given the bullish scenario and the projected positive market sentiment and growth trend. Will ACH reach $1? The predictions for 2034 show an ACH maximum price of $1. While this indicates significant growth potential, ACH is likely to reach $1 soon. Does ACH have a good long-term future? Alchemy Pay (ACH) shows a generally positive long-term outlook, with projected steady price growth over the years. By 2030, ACH’s market cap is expected to increase substantially, indicating a good long-term future with moderate to strong growth potential. Recent news/ opinion on Alchemy Pay Alchemy Pay announced that Aptos recorded $2.8 billion in peer to peer stablecoin transactions on February 3 as new integrations with Rhea Finance and Alchemy expanded ecosystem support and signaled accelerating network adoption. Aptos' peer-to-peer stablecoin transaction volume hit $2.8B on February 3 while @rhea_finance and @Alchemy enabled Aptos support, unlocking new tools for founders, developers, and users. 👉 All signs of adoption. Read @TokenRelations ' latest Newsletter: https://t.co/EEDH303btL — Aptos (@Aptos) February 6, 2026 Alchemy Pay price prediction March 2026 Alchemy Pay’s price in March 2027 is expected to be a minimum of $0.00725. Given an average trading value of $0.007903 in USD, the maximum value can be $0.0219 Month Minimum price Average price Maximum price Alchemy Pay price prediction March 2026 $0.00725 $0.007903 $0.0219 Alchemy Pay price prediction 2026 The price of Alchemy Pay (ACH) is predicted to reach a minimum value of $0.0309 in 2026, with a maximum of $0.0427 and an average trading price of $0.0364. This projection is driven by steady growth in crypto payment adoption, Alchemy Pay’s expanding merchant network, and integration of fiat-to-crypto gateways, while overall market caution keeps price movement moderate. Year Minimum price Average price Maximum price Alchemy Pay price prediction 2026 $0.0309 $0.0364 $0.0427 Alchemy Pay price predictions 2027-2032 Year Minimum price Average price Maximum price 2027 $0.0040422 $0.0079259 $0.0124 2028 $0.0125 $0.0229 $0.0348 2029 $0.0611 $0.2037 $0.3667 2030 $0.0187 $0.0426 $0.0699 2031 $0.0438 $0.0674 $0.0944 2032 $0.0733 $0.1344 $0.2043 Alchemy Pay price prediction 2027 As per the forecast and technical analysis, in 2027, the price of Alchemy Pay (ACH) is expected to reach a minimum of $0.0040422, a maximum of $0.0124, and an average value of $0.0079259. This expected growth comes from increasing global adoption of crypto payment solutions, expansion of Alchemy Pay’s partnerships with financial institutions, and wider use of its on-ramp and off-ramp services, strengthening its position in digital payments. Alchemy Pay price prediction 2028 The price of 1 Alchemy Pay (ACH) is expected to reach a minimum level of $0.0125 in 2028, with a maximum of $0.0348 and an average price of $0.0229. This outlook is supported by growing real-world adoption of crypto payments, Alchemy Pay’s continued expansion into global markets, and strengthened integration with major financial networks, driving steady demand for its payment infrastructure. Alchemy crypto price prediction 2029 According to analysts on past price data of ACH, in 2029 the price of Alchemy Pay is forecasted to reach a minimum of $0.0611, a maximum of $0.3667, and an average trading value of $0.2037. This projection is driven by the global expansion of crypto-fiat payment systems, growing regulatory acceptance of digital payments, and Alchemy Pay’s continuous integration with banks, e-commerce platforms, and blockchain networks, all contributing to sustainable long-term growth. Alchemy Pay price prediction 2030 The price of Alchemy Pay (ACH) is predicted to reach a minimum value of $0.0187 in 2030, with a maximum of $0.0699 and an average trading price of $0.0426. This rise is expected as global adoption of hybrid fiat-crypto payment systems accelerates, with Alchemy Pay expanding partnerships across fintech and blockchain ecosystems, boosting transaction volume and long-term token utility. Alchemy Pay prediction 2031 Alchemy Pay price is forecast to reach a lowest possible level of $0.0438 in 2031. As per our findings, the ACH price could reach a maximum possible level of $0.0499 with an average forecast price of $0.0687. ACH crypto price prediction 2032 The price of Alchemy Pay (ACH) is predicted to reach a minimum level of $0.0991 in 2032, with a maximum of $0.1148 and an average price of $0.1018 This projection is supported by Alchemy Pay’s full-scale global adoption, integration with major payment networks, and the increasing use of blockchain-based settlements in mainstream commerce, positioning ACH as a leading solution for seamless fiat-to-crypto transactions worldwide. ACH crypto price prediction 2026 – 2032 Alchemy Pay market price prediction: Analysts’ ACH price forecast Firm Name 2026 2027 Coincodex $ 0.007270 $ 0.007490 DigitalCoinPrice $0.00737 $0.0128 Cryptopolitan’s ACH price prediction According to Cryptopolitan’s predictions, Alchemy Pay (ACH) is expected to grow significantly from 2026 to 2032. In 2026, ACH tokens could reach a maximum price of $0.0100. By 2029, ACH could range from $0.0250 to $0.0309, and by 2032, from $0.0793 to $0.0918, indicating strong long-term growth potential. Alchemy Pay historic price sentiment ACH price history by Coin gecko ACH launched near $0.02 in 2020, slipped to $0.01, then surged to $0.1975 after its Binance partnership before cooling to $0.0628 and closing 2021 around $0.0919. In 2022 the price collapsed to $0.0133, recovered to $0.0222, and in 2023 climbed again toward $0.049 before easing back near $0.0303. During 2024 ACH fell to $0.0145, rebounded to $0.0216, pushed toward $0.029, and finished the year moving between $0.0205 and $0.0397. In early 2025 the token traded around $0.03 to $0.037 before sliding into the $0.016 to $0.024 zone, ending June close to $0.0191 and drifting near $0.020 by August. Late 2025 saw a deeper drop into $0.012 to $0.013 followed by a December low near $0.0070 to $0.0078 and a modest rebound toward $0.0078 to $0.0082 in early January 2026. From January 3 to mid-January 2026, ACH stabilized after its December selloff, trading mostly between $0.0076 and $0.0083 as buyers defended support and volatility compressed following weeks of heavy downside. From mid-January to February 7, price action remained range bound with mild swings between roughly $0.0074 and $0.0089, showing cautious accumulation attempts but no decisive breakout as overall momentum stayed muted. From Feb 7, 2026 ACH traded around $0.00737 and moved within a narrow range near $0.0071 to $0.0077 during the following days as the market showed limited volatility. Between mid-February and March 8, 2026 ACH remained mostly stable and traded around $0.007 to $0.008, reflecting sideways price action with mild recovery attempts.
