News
23 Mar 2026, 17:38
Shiba Inu Price Prediction: Can the 637% Burn Rate Surge Push SHIB to a New Breakout?

Shiba Inu opened the new week with a sharp increase in deflationary activity. On Monday, March 23, blockchain tracker Shibburn confirmed that the SHIB burn rate surged by 637.44% in a single 24-hour period. A total of 8,063,851 SHIB tokens were permanently removed from circulation. The development has drawn renewed attention from investors monitoring the asset's supply dynamics. The burn rate spike comes after a difficult weekend for SHIB, during which the token traded in negative territory. The sudden reversal in both network activity and price direction has prompted renewed discussion about what may be driving momentum heading into the new trading week. Burn Activity Drives Supply Squeeze Token burning remains one of the core mechanisms used by the Shiba Inu ecosystem to manage long-term supply. Each burn transaction permanently removes tokens from circulation, reducing the total available supply over time. Sustained burn activity, in theory, creates upward price pressure through scarcity. Monday's figures represent a significant single-day jump. A 637.44% increase in the burn rate is not routine. It reflects a coordinated or unusually high level of activity within the community. Shibburn's data confirms this was not a gradual uptick but a sharp, concentrated spike. The broader goal of the Shiba Inu burn strategy is to reduce the token's quadrillion-scale supply to levels that are more conducive to price appreciation. Progress has been incremental, but events like Monday's activity demonstrate that the community remains committed to this objective. SHIB Price Snaps Weekend Losing Streak Following the surge in burn activity, Shiba Inu recorded a 5.68% price increase within 24 hours. At the time of writing, Shiba Inu is trading at around $0.00000608. According to Coincodex , SHIB stabilized around $0.000005996 in the hours following the spike. The token had been trading in the red over the previous days, making the reversal notable.
23 Mar 2026, 17:25
Cryptocurrency Security Crisis: Ledger Co-Founder Demands Firearm Rights for Digital Asset Protection

BitcoinWorld Cryptocurrency Security Crisis: Ledger Co-Founder Demands Firearm Rights for Digital Asset Protection In a startling development that highlights growing security concerns within the digital asset space, Ledger co-founder Eric Larchevêque has publicly advocated for cryptocurrency holders to possess firearm rights for self-protection, following the violent 2023 kidnapping of his business partner. This controversial position emerges as crypto-related crimes surge globally, forcing investors to confront unprecedented security challenges. Cryptocurrency Security Takes a Radical Turn Eric Larchevêque, the former CEO and co-founder of hardware wallet manufacturer Ledger, recently made headlines with his unconventional security proposal. Speaking from France in early 2025, Larchevêque argued that cryptocurrency investors face unique vulnerabilities that traditional security measures cannot adequately address. Consequently, he believes firearm ownership represents a necessary component of comprehensive digital asset protection. This position follows the traumatic January 2023 incident where French and Spanish authorities arrested the final suspect involved in kidnapping fellow Ledger co-founder David Balland. Police reports indicate the assailants subjected Balland to physical assault during the ordeal. Moreover, this high-profile case represents just one example of increasing violence targeting cryptocurrency entrepreneurs and investors worldwide. The Rising Threat Against Crypto Holders Security analysts document a disturbing trend of targeted violence against cryptocurrency holders. According to blockchain intelligence firm Chainalysis, crypto-related crimes involving physical threats increased by 42% between 2022 and 2024. Additionally, law enforcement agencies across multiple jurisdictions report sophisticated criminal networks specifically targeting high-net-worth digital asset investors. Larchevêque emphasized this escalating danger during his recent statements. “Violence targeting crypto holders is on the rise,” he stated firmly. “We need to recognize this reality and take appropriate measures.” The entrepreneur further explained that traditional security approaches often prove insufficient against determined attackers who specifically seek cryptocurrency holdings. Self-Defense in the Digital Age The debate about self-defense rights for cryptocurrency holders intersects with broader discussions about digital sovereignty and personal security. Larchevêque specifically mentioned the need for “real weapons, such as pistols and small rifles” rather than relying solely on digital security measures. This perspective challenges conventional thinking about asset protection in the blockchain era. Security experts note several factors contributing to cryptocurrency holders’ vulnerability: Pseudonymous wealth: Blockchain transactions are public, enabling potential attackers to identify targets Irreversible transfers: Unlike traditional finance, crypto transactions cannot be reversed once confirmed Physical extraction risk: Attackers may use coercion to obtain private keys or seed phrases Cross-border challenges: Jurisdictional complexities complicate law enforcement responses Ledger’s Security Evolution After Trauma The 2023 kidnapping incident fundamentally changed Ledger’s approach to executive security. Following the attack on David Balland, Larchevêque hired a private security firm to protect himself and his family. However, he discovered that physical security measures alone provided incomplete protection for someone whose wealth primarily exists in digital form. Interestingly, Larchevêque rejected converting his cryptocurrency holdings to traditional fiat currency as a security measure. “I would not be able to sleep at night holding my life’s work in euros,” he explained. This statement highlights the deep conviction many cryptocurrency pioneers maintain about the superiority of digital assets over traditional financial systems, despite associated risks. The table below illustrates the security approaches Larchevêque has considered: Security Measure Implementation Perceived Effectiveness Private Security Firm Implemented after 2023 kidnapping Partial protection against physical threats Firearm Ownership Proposed but legally restricted in France Potential self-defense capability Fiat Conversion Rejected as unacceptable Would eliminate crypto-specific risks Geographic Relocation Not mentioned in statements Unclear effectiveness against global threats Legal and Cultural Implications Larchevêque’s proposal faces significant legal hurdles, particularly in European nations with strict firearm regulations. France, where Ledger maintains its headquarters, imposes rigorous controls on gun ownership. Furthermore, cultural attitudes toward firearms differ substantially between regions, with European perspectives generally favoring state-provided security over individual armed protection. Nevertheless, cryptocurrency communities in jurisdictions with more permissive firearm laws have begun discussing similar security approaches. In the United States, where Second Amendment rights provide constitutional protection for firearm ownership, some crypto investors already incorporate armed security into their protection strategies. However, experts caution that firearms represent just one element of comprehensive security planning. Expert Perspectives on Crypto Security Security professionals offer varied responses to Larchevêque’s controversial position. Jane Wilkinson, a former intelligence officer specializing in executive protection, acknowledges the unique challenges cryptocurrency holders face. “Traditional security protocols assume assets remain in regulated financial institutions,” she explains. “Cryptocurrency fundamentally changes the threat model by placing immense value in personally controlled digital formats.” Conversely, digital security expert Marcus Chen emphasizes technological solutions over physical weapons. “Hardware wallets, multi-signature setups, and geographic distribution of assets provide robust protection without escalating violence risks,” Chen argues. He further notes that firearm ownership introduces additional liabilities and potential escalation dangers during confrontations. The Broader Context of Crypto Violence The security challenges Larchevêque describes extend beyond individual investors to encompass the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem. Exchange executives, blockchain developers, and prominent community members increasingly report threats and harassment. This troubling pattern suggests criminals perceive cryptocurrency professionals as particularly vulnerable targets compared to traditional finance executives. Several high-profile incidents illustrate this disturbing trend: The 2022 home invasion targeting a Bitcoin entrepreneur in London Multiple kidnapping attempts against Ethereum developers in 2023 Sophisticated social engineering attacks leading to physical confrontations Coordinated threats against decentralized finance protocol founders Law enforcement agencies struggle to address these crimes effectively. Detective Michael Rodriguez of the European Cybercrime Centre explains the challenge: “Cryptocurrency crimes often cross international borders, complicating jurisdiction. Additionally, victims sometimes hesitate to involve authorities, fearing regulatory scrutiny of their digital assets.” Alternative Security Approaches While Larchevêque advocates for firearm rights, the cryptocurrency industry explores multiple security strategies. Privacy-focused technologies, including confidential transactions and zero-knowledge proofs, help obscure wealth visibility. Additionally, decentralized security networks enable community-based protection mechanisms without traditional weaponry. Several companies now offer specialized security services for cryptocurrency holders: Digital asset protection firms: Provide comprehensive security including threat assessment Blockchain monitoring services: Track potential threats through on-chain analysis Emergency response protocols: Established procedures for duress situations Security education programs: Train investors in threat recognition and avoidance These professional services often incorporate elements of traditional executive protection while addressing cryptocurrency-specific vulnerabilities. However, their high costs place them beyond reach for average investors, creating security disparities within the crypto community. Conclusion The cryptocurrency security landscape continues evolving as digital asset adoption increases globally. Eric Larchevêque’s controversial advocacy for firearm rights highlights the extreme measures some industry leaders consider necessary for protection. This position emerges from personal trauma and reflects genuine concerns about rising violence targeting cryptocurrency holders. While firearm ownership represents one potential response, comprehensive security requires multi-layered approaches combining digital protections, physical security measures, and legal safeguards. As the cryptocurrency ecosystem matures, developing effective security protocols remains essential for sustainable growth and mainstream adoption. FAQs Q1: Why does Eric Larchevêque believe cryptocurrency holders need firearm rights? Larchevêque argues that rising violence specifically targeting cryptocurrency investors necessitates self-defense capabilities that traditional security measures cannot provide, particularly given the irreversible nature of digital asset theft under coercion. Q2: What incident prompted Larchevêque’s controversial position? The January 2023 kidnapping and assault of fellow Ledger co-founder David Balland demonstrated the physical dangers cryptocurrency entrepreneurs face, with French and Spanish police recently arresting the final suspect in the case. Q3: Are cryptocurrency holders at greater risk than traditional investors? Security analysts note unique vulnerabilities including public blockchain visibility of transactions, irreversible asset transfers, and criminals specifically targeting digital asset holders, though comprehensive risk comparisons remain complex. Q4: What security alternatives exist besides firearm ownership? Professional security services, hardware wallets, multi-signature arrangements, asset diversification, privacy technologies, and security education represent alternative approaches to cryptocurrency protection. Q5: How do legal jurisdictions affect this security debate? Firearm regulations vary dramatically between countries, with European nations typically imposing strict controls while some other regions permit broader ownership, creating different security options based on geographic location. This post Cryptocurrency Security Crisis: Ledger Co-Founder Demands Firearm Rights for Digital Asset Protection first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
23 Mar 2026, 17:06
Ripple CEO Speaks: Regulation Is Coming, and XRP Is Right in the Middle of It

The digital asset industry continues to evolve under increasing scrutiny from policymakers, as regulatory clarity emerges as a decisive factor for long-term growth. Market participants track legislative developments closely, since defined rules often determine how institutions allocate capital, manage compliance, and integrate blockchain-based assets into existing financial systems. Within this environment, XRP remains a focal point due to its established role in cross-border payments and its history of regulatory engagement in the United States. Recent commentary shared by John Squire draws attention to remarks from Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse , who discussed the rising likelihood of significant crypto legislation progressing in the near term. Garlinghouse’s outlook reflects growing optimism that the regulatory landscape may soon shift toward clearer and more structured guidelines for digital assets. The CLARITY Act and Its Legislative Path The CLARITY Act represents a key legislative effort aimed at defining how digital assets should be classified and regulated across federal agencies. Lawmakers designed the bill to reduce ambiguity between regulatory bodies and to establish clearer jurisdictional boundaries, particularly between the SEC and CFTC. RIPPLE CEO SPEAKS Brad Garlinghouse says there’s now a HIGH probability the CLARITY ACT gets approved VERY SOON. Regulation is coming and $XRP is right in the middle of it. This is not noise. This is SETUP. pic.twitter.com/KduILpy6FA — John Squire (@TheCryptoSquire) March 23, 2026 Although the House passed the legislation in 2025, the Senate has delayed its advancement due to unresolved concerns, including provisions related to stablecoins and broader financial safeguards. Ongoing discussions involving policymakers and industry stakeholders have contributed to renewed momentum, as regulatory priorities continue to align with the need for a comprehensive framework that supports innovation while maintaining oversight. Ripple’s Position Within a Changing Regulatory Landscape Ripple operates at the intersection of blockchain innovation and financial infrastructure, making it particularly sensitive to regulatory outcomes. The company’s ongoing engagement with regulators and policymakers reflects its strategy to align its operations with evolving compliance standards. Garlinghouse has emphasized the importance of clarity, suggesting that clearer rules would enable broader institutional participation and reduce uncertainty across the market. XRP’s classification has already received partial legal clarification following prior court rulings, but a legislative framework like the CLARITY Act could further standardize its treatment across jurisdictions . This development would likely influence how financial institutions assess risk, allocate resources, and integrate XRP into payment systems. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Institutional Interest and Market Outlook Market observers often associate regulatory clarity with increased institutional confidence. Financial institutions typically require well-defined legal frameworks before deploying capital into emerging asset classes. If lawmakers finalize comprehensive legislation, institutions may expand their engagement with digital assets, including XRP, within compliant and structured environments. Analysts continue to monitor these developments as potential catalysts for broader adoption. While price outcomes depend on multiple factors, including liquidity, macroeconomic trends, and market sentiment, regulatory certainty often strengthens the foundation for sustained participation. A Transition Toward Structured Growth Garlinghouse’s remarks reflect a broader transition in the crypto industry, where regulation now plays a central role in shaping market direction. As legislative discussions progress, XRP remains closely tied to outcomes that could define the next phase of digital asset integration into global finance. The trajectory of the CLARITY Act and similar initiatives will likely influence how the industry evolves, positioning regulation not as a constraint but as a framework that enables long-term scalability and institutional alignment. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Ripple CEO Speaks: Regulation Is Coming, and XRP Is Right in the Middle of It appeared first on Times Tabloid .
23 Mar 2026, 17:00
TRON DAO Scales AI Fund to $1 Billion, Expanding Its 2023 Agentic Economy Thesis

Geneva, Switzerland — March 23, 2026 — TRON DAO , the community-governed DAO dedicated to accelerating the decentralization of the internet through blockchain technology and decentralized applications (dApps), today announced the expansion of its AI Fund from $100 million to $1 billion. The fund will target investments in and acquisitions of early-stage companies building core infrastructure for the agentic economy. It will prioritize the development and consolidation of agent identity systems, stablecoin-based payment rails, tokenized real-world assets, and developer tooling for autonomous financial systems. The expansion builds on the fund’s thesis, first outlined in 2023, that AI and blockchain would converge, creating demand for programmable, permissionless financial infrastructure. With growing validation of its original thesis, what began as an early conviction has now scaled into a strategic commitment: AI agents will become active participants in the global economy, requiring new financial infrastructures that combine identity, payment, and asset ownership fully onchain. Three core theses continue to guide the fund’s mandate: First, stablecoins are currently the most viable form of money for agent-to-agent commerce. While AI agents cannot access traditional banking services, they can operate digital wallets. Second, stablecoins are the natural payment layer for individuals and small teams. As AI-augmented people can run what once required entire teams from a single laptop, they need simple, accessible payment systems without complex applications, onboarding, or intermediary fees. Third, tokenized equity is the ownership layer for the agentic economy. As AI agents begin to manage and transact economic interests on behalf of users, they need a reliable way to hold and transfer ownership. Tokenized equity provides this framework, as it is divisible, programmable, and transferable 24/7. With over 370 million user accounts on the blockchain, the TRON blockchain is utilized for over $21 billion in daily transaction volume. The network has a circulating supply of more than $85 billion in USDT, making it one of the largest sources of stablecoin liquidity across blockchain networks. Agent-to-agent payments are expected to rely on infrastructure that is already proven at scale. TRON has established this infrastructure through its scalable network, broad user base, and deep liquidity, positioning it to support the growing demands of the agentic economy while extending its role into settlement and custody infrastructure for tokenized assets. Founders building at the intersection of AI and onchain commerce are invited to reach out directly to [email protected] . About TRON DAO TRON DAO is a community-governed DAO dedicated to accelerating the decentralization of the internet via blockchain technology and dApps. Founded in September 2017 by H.E. Justin Sun, the TRON blockchain has experienced significant growth since its MainNet launch in May 2018. TRON hosts one of the largest circulating supply of USD Tether (USDT) stablecoin, which currently exceeds $85 billion. As of March 2026, the TRON blockchain has recorded over 370 million in total user accounts, more than 13 billion in total transactions, and over $23 billion in total value locked (TVL), based on TRONSCAN. Recognized as the global settlement layer for stablecoin transactions and everyday purchases with proven success, TRON is “Moving Trillions, Empowering Billions.” TRONNetwork | TRONDAO | X | YouTube | Telegram | Discord | Reddit | GitHub | Medium | Forum Media Contact Yeweon Park [email protected]
23 Mar 2026, 16:09
Mt. Gox Just Moved Bitcoin After 4 Months — Is a Massive Sell-Off About to Hit the Market?

Mt. Gox, the long-defunct Japanese exchange, has once again captured attention after initiating a Bitcoin move on-chain on Monday—sending ripples through the crypto community. According to data from Arkham Research, this marks the first transaction in over four months. While it remains unclear whether the recent transfer signals imminent creditor reimbursements, the timing is especially Originally published on ZyCrypto - blockchain news, expert analysis, and Web3 coverage. Full article at ZyCrypto.com
23 Mar 2026, 15:26
Resolv and IoTeX move to compensate users as DeFi exploits push 2026 losses past $137M

Resolv Labs announced that it would be restoring redemptions to pre-incident holders today, March 23, after suffering one of the largest DeFi exploits recorded this year a day earlier. The protocol has also published a detailed account of the incident, stating that a compromised private key was what enabled the attacker to mint 80 million USR tokens. A few hours after Resolv’s announcement, DeFi platform IoTeX , whose cross-chain bridge was exploited on February 21, announced that it has opened a live claims portal, offering 100% compensation to all affected users. IoTeX users are directed to check their status and proceed to a payout page to claim their assets. So the bridge incident, one of four major hacks that occurred in February, per security firm Halborn , is now entering its settlement phase. With Resolv’s incident adding to the tally, the first quarter of 2026 is shaping up to be a busy quarter for DeFi platforms in terms of attacks and exploits, having suffered a cumulative loss of over $137 million. Resolv’s situation is more complex, as it is barely 48 hours since it happened, with the protocol still yet to release a full post-mortem. Resolv stated that approximately 9 million of the tokens held by the attacker have since been burned. The protocol’s collateral pool currently holds approximately $141 million in assets, and only $0.5 million in redemptions were processed before the pause, limiting the direct financial drain. Which protocols absorbed the Resolv fallout? The Resolv breach affected a cluster of DeFi platforms that had accepted USR and related tokens as collateral, forcing them to declare their exposure and update their respective users on the safety of their funds. Paul Frambot , co-founder and CEO of lending network Morpho, confirmed that approximately 15 of the network’s 500-plus vaults had non-negligible exposure to impacted markets. “While affected vaults were specifically designed for higher-risk strategies with longer-tail collateral assets, every other vault without exposure, including lower-risk ‘prime vaults’, remained completely unaffected,” Frambot wrote. He also praised curators Re7 Labs, Steakhouse Financial, and kpk, among others, for cross-supporting one another through the crisis. Risk management firm Gauntlet stated that it is still discussing a resolution with Resolv and that it is working on a compensation plan for any remaining funds. The platform stated on X, “Gauntlet USD Alpha has no exposure to USR nor RLP positions. Vaults on our platform are unaffected with no impact to capital suppliers.” It also added that all deposits and caps have been reduced to zero for specific Morpho vaults. Lending protocol Fluid announced that its team had secured short-term loans, backed by personal commitments from Lom Lomashuk of Cyber Fund, a contributor known as weremeow, and the Fluid core team itself, to cover 100% of bad debt currently in the protocol. It added that the Resolv team confirmed that they will cover all USR positions that originated before the security incident and will also enable redemptions required to close those debt positions. According to Fluid, multiple investors had expressed interest in purchasing its treasury tokens should further funds be required. It also reassured its users that its smart contracts are safe and operating as intended, writing on X, “All other markets continue to function normally, and protocol safeguards remain active. Users may see temporary rate volatility while positions are being unwound.” Has AI made DeFi harder to secure? The $137 million lost to DeFi exploits since January, as tallied by blockchain researcher CipherResearchx , places 2026 on a troubling trajectory. The figure covers 15 incidents, led by Step Finance ($27.3 million), Truebit ($26.2 million), Resolv (over $25 million), and SwapNet ($13.4 million). For context, Q1 losses of over $1.64 billion and $336.3 million were recorded across the whole of crypto in 2025 and 2024, respectively, per Immunefi . However, DeFi losses in the first quarter of 2025 were around $106.8 million. The 2026 DeFi-specific total, which is already higher than the exploits of Q1 2025, shows that exploits are accumulating at an increasing pace. Also, there’s a new AI dimension to DeFi risk vectors. In February, the lending protocol Moonwell lost $1.78 million as Security auditor Pashov stated that pull requests (PR) of the project show commits were co-authored by Claude Opus 4.6, making it what some observers described as the first significant DeFi exploit linked to vibe coding. There’s a middle ground between leaving money in the bank and rolling the dice in crypto. Start with this free video on decentralized finance .















































