hodler

27 May 2026, 16:55

Ondo Finance Tokenized Stock TVL Surpasses $1.17 Billion, Setting New All-Time High

BitcoinWorld Ondo Finance Tokenized Stock TVL Surpasses $1.17 Billion, Setting New All-Time High The Total Value Locked (TVL) in Ondo Finance’s tokenized stock products has reached a new all-time high, crossing the $1.17 billion mark. According to data reported by Odaily, this represents a 42.3% increase over the past month and an 11% gain over the past week alone. Surge in Demand for Tokenized Real-World Assets The rapid growth in Ondo Finance’s stock token TVL reflects a broader trend within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem: increasing investor appetite for tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). These products, which represent traditional financial instruments like equities on blockchain networks, offer investors exposure to familiar markets with the efficiency and transparency of on-chain infrastructure. Ondo Finance, a protocol focused on bridging traditional finance with DeFi, has emerged as a key player in this niche. Its tokenized stock offerings allow users to gain exposure to major equities without leaving the crypto ecosystem, combining the liquidity of digital assets with the regulatory framework of traditional securities. Context and Implications for the Market The $1.17 billion milestone underscores a significant shift in how capital flows between traditional and decentralized markets. While the broader crypto market has experienced periods of volatility, the steady accumulation in Ondo’s stock token pools suggests that institutional and retail investors alike are seeking yield and diversification through tokenized assets. This growth also highlights the increasing sophistication of DeFi protocols in handling complex financial products. Unlike simple lending or swapping pools, tokenized stock products require robust oracle infrastructure, regulatory compliance mechanisms, and deep liquidity management. Ondo’s ability to scale its TVL to this level signals operational maturity. What This Means for Investors For market participants, the rising TVL in Ondo’s stock tokens indicates a growing confidence in the tokenization model. It also points to a potential expansion of the RWA sector, which analysts predict could grow to trillions of dollars in locked value over the next decade. However, investors should remain aware of the regulatory uncertainties and smart contract risks inherent in these products. Conclusion Ondo Finance’s achievement of a $1.17 billion TVL in tokenized stock products is a notable milestone for both the protocol and the broader RWA movement. The 42% monthly growth rate demonstrates strong market demand and could encourage further innovation in on-chain asset representation. As the DeFi ecosystem matures, such developments will likely play a critical role in bridging the gap between traditional finance and blockchain-based markets. FAQs Q1: What is Ondo Finance? Ondo Finance is a decentralized finance protocol that creates and manages tokenized versions of traditional financial assets, including stocks and bonds, allowing users to trade them on blockchain networks. Q2: What does TVL mean in this context? Total Value Locked (TVL) refers to the total value of assets deposited in Ondo Finance’s tokenized stock pools. A higher TVL indicates greater user adoption and liquidity. Q3: Is investing in tokenized stocks safe? Tokenized stocks carry risks similar to traditional equities plus additional risks from smart contract vulnerabilities and regulatory changes. Investors should conduct thorough due diligence before participating. This post Ondo Finance Tokenized Stock TVL Surpasses $1.17 Billion, Setting New All-Time High first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

27 May 2026, 16:45

Aztec Labs Acquires ZKPassport to Strengthen Privacy-First Identity on Ethereum

BitcoinWorld Aztec Labs Acquires ZKPassport to Strengthen Privacy-First Identity on Ethereum Aztec Labs, the development team behind a leading privacy-focused Layer 2 network for Ethereum, has acquired ZKPassport, a zero-knowledge identity verification tool. The acquisition, reported by The Block, brings the entire ZKPassport team — including co-founders Michael Elliott and Theo Mazu — into Aztec Labs. What ZKPassport Brings to Aztec ZKPassport allows users to verify personal attributes, such as age or nationality, without revealing their actual identity documents. The technology works by scanning a passport’s NFC chip with a smartphone, generating a cryptographic zero-knowledge proof that confirms specific details without exposing the underlying data. For Aztec Labs, which is building a private, encrypted version of Ethereum, integrating ZKPassport’s technology could enable compliant yet privacy-preserving identity checks. This is a critical requirement for many decentralized finance (DeFi) applications and regulated entities seeking to operate on the blockchain without compromising user anonymity. Why This Acquisition Matters The deal signals a growing convergence between privacy technology and real-world identity requirements. While blockchain networks often tout pseudonymity, regulators increasingly demand Know Your Customer (KYC) checks. ZKPassport’s approach offers a middle ground: proving identity attributes without revealing the full passport details. Aztec Labs has long been at the forefront of Ethereum privacy, using zero-knowledge proofs to shield transaction data. Adding ZKPassport’s technology could allow the network to offer built-in identity verification, making it more attractive for institutional use cases and regulated applications. Implications for Users and Developers For end users, the integration could mean smoother access to DeFi protocols that require identity checks, without having to upload sensitive documents to third-party servers. For developers, it provides a ready-made privacy layer for identity verification, reducing the complexity of building compliant applications on Aztec’s network. The acquisition also strengthens Aztec Labs’ talent pool. Elliott and Mazu bring deep expertise in zero-knowledge cryptography and identity systems, which will likely accelerate product development. Conclusion Aztec Labs’ acquisition of ZKPassport represents a strategic move to embed privacy-preserving identity verification directly into its Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem. As regulatory pressure on crypto projects increases, the ability to offer compliant yet private identity solutions could become a key differentiator. The deal positions Aztec Labs to serve both the privacy-focused community and institutional clients seeking regulatory clarity. FAQs Q1: What is ZKPassport? ZKPassport is a zero-knowledge identity verification tool that lets users prove personal attributes (like age or nationality) by scanning their passport’s NFC chip, without revealing the actual document data. Q2: Why did Aztec Labs acquire ZKPassport? Aztec Labs aims to integrate ZKPassport’s technology into its privacy-focused Ethereum Layer 2 network to offer built-in, compliant identity verification for decentralized applications. Q3: Will this affect user privacy? No. ZKPassport uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify only specific attributes, not the full identity. This maintains user privacy while meeting compliance requirements. This post Aztec Labs Acquires ZKPassport to Strengthen Privacy-First Identity on Ethereum first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

27 May 2026, 15:45

BIS project finds tokenization could make cross-border payments faster, safer

Project Agorá, backed by major central banks, will now move toward "real-value" testing to settle tokenized central bank money and bank deposits on blockchain rails.

27 May 2026, 15:45

Tokenized Pokémon Card Sales Surge to Record $7.4 Million in First Week of May

BitcoinWorld Tokenized Pokémon Card Sales Surge to Record $7.4 Million in First Week of May The market for tokenized Pokémon cards has reached a new milestone. Total sales of blockchain-based digital representations of physical Pokémon cards hit an all-time high of $7.4 million during the first week of May, according to data from ODaily. This figure represents a 337% increase compared to the same period last year, signaling a growing appetite for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization among collectors and investors. Market Leaders and Share Breakdown The tokenized Pokémon card market is currently dominated by three main platforms. Courtyard leads with a 46% market share, followed by Collector Crypt at 27% and Phygitals at 26%. These platforms allow users to buy, sell, and trade digital tokens that represent ownership of specific physical cards stored in professional, insured vaults. The model eliminates many of the risks associated with physical trading, including counterfeiting, shipping accidents, and damage from handling or storage. Why Tokenization Matters for Collectors The surge in tokenized Pokémon card sales reflects a broader trend in the RWA sector, where physical assets are represented as digital tokens on a blockchain. For collectors, this offers several advantages: verified authenticity through professional grading and storage, fractional ownership options, and a global, 24/7 marketplace. The system also provides a transparent, immutable record of ownership and transaction history, which can increase trust and liquidity in what was previously a largely opaque and fragmented market. Implications for the Broader Collectibles Market The success of tokenized Pokémon cards could have implications for other collectible asset classes, including trading cards from other franchises, luxury goods, fine art, and even real estate. As blockchain infrastructure matures and regulatory clarity improves, the RWA model is likely to attract more institutional and retail participants. However, the market remains nascent, and potential risks include smart contract vulnerabilities, custodial trust, and regulatory uncertainty regarding digital asset classification. Conclusion The record-breaking sales of tokenized Pokémon cards in early May underscore the growing intersection of traditional collectibles and blockchain technology. With platforms like Courtyard, Collector Crypt, and Phygitals driving adoption, the RWA model is proving its utility in addressing long-standing pain points in physical collectible trading. While the market is still evolving, the data suggests that tokenization is not just a passing trend but a meaningful shift in how collectors and investors approach asset ownership and liquidity. FAQs Q1: What are tokenized Pokémon cards? Tokenized Pokémon cards are digital tokens on a blockchain that represent ownership of a specific physical Pokémon card. The physical card is stored in a professional vault, while the token can be traded or sold on digital marketplaces. Q2: How do tokenized cards reduce risk compared to physical trading? By storing the physical card in a secure, insured vault, tokenization eliminates risks such as counterfeiting, damage during shipping, loss, and theft. The blockchain also provides a transparent and immutable record of ownership and transaction history. Q3: Is the tokenized Pokémon card market regulated? Regulation varies by jurisdiction. The RWA tokenization space is still developing, and regulatory frameworks for digital assets are evolving. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and be aware of potential legal and tax implications. This post Tokenized Pokémon Card Sales Surge to Record $7.4 Million in First Week of May first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

27 May 2026, 15:41

SUI Relative Weakness: What Layer-1 Traders Are Really Pricing In

Sui arrived with a clear technical pitch—parallel execution, an object‑centric model, and Move smart contracts designed for safety and performance. Yet, on many ratio charts, SUI has lagged peers during risk‑on bursts. That “relative weakness” doesn’t necessarily mean the chain is broken; it signals what markets are demanding before repricing the asset. This article maps out what Layer‑1 traders are likely pricing in: supply overhang from unlocks and emissions, the quality of on‑chain activity, liquidity and derivatives structure, and the comparative lens against Solana, Aptos, and Near. It also outlines practical steps to track the spread and manage risk. No hype—just a framework for why SUI might be cheap for a reason today, and what would have to change for the market to rerate it. Point Details Relative weakness is a market structure signal Ratio charts (e.g., SUI/SOL) show underperformance; traders want durable demand and fee capture before expanding multiples. Supply overhang matters Multi‑year vesting and staking emissions can weigh on price. Unlock calendars and real dilution are closely tracked. TVL quality over quantity Incentive‑driven TVL is discounted. Retention, fees, and organic users carry more weight than short‑term liquidity spikes. Liquidity and perps drive spot Order book depth, market maker inventories, open interest, and funding rates often lead spot moves on L1s. Peer benchmarking is unforgiving Solana, Near, and others set the bar for throughput, fees, apps, and growth. SUI trades on that relative scorecard. Clear catalysts could flip the spread Flagship apps, fee sustainability, stablecoin inflows, or token‑economic changes could improve SUI’s relative bid. How traders define “relative weakness” in SUI “Relative weakness” means an asset rises less on up days and falls more on down days versus a benchmark. For SUI, traders commonly assess: Ratio charts such as SUI/BTC, SUI/ETH, or SUI/SOL. A down‑sloping line indicates underperformance. Impulse quality: the magnitude and duration of bounces after market‑wide selloffs. Market breadth: the participation of SUI ecosystem tokens during rallies. If majors pump while SUI ecosystem lags, that’s weak internals. Relative weakness can persist even as fundamentals improve. Markets might be repricing risk factors (supply, durability of TVL, or uncertainty around app‑level product‑market fit). The key is to map price behavior back to what traders weigh most heavily—sustainability and scarcity. Supply overhang and unlocks: the drag markets discount Layer‑1s trade like growth equities with a token‑specific twist: circulating supply increases through vesting and staking emissions. If incoming supply outpaces organic demand, price often grinds lower or lags stronger peers. What to check before you size SUI exposure Unlock calendar and cliff sizes. You can track schedules on TokenUnlocks and official channels from the Sui Foundation. Inflation vs. real yield. Staking APYs are often quoted in nominal terms; what matters is APY minus dilution. If new issuance outpaces rewards plus on‑chain fee capture, holders face net dilution. Concentration risk. Check the distribution of stakes and large holders via the Sui Explorer . Concentrated unlocks amplify supply shocks. Traders discount future supply today. Even if unlock recipients are long‑term aligned, the option value to sell exists. That option depresses valuation multiples until the market sees sufficient demand to absorb it. Risk note: Unlocks don’t guarantee downside, but high‑leverage long positioning into large unlock windows can compound drawdowns if liquidity thins. On‑chain traction versus valuation: reading Sui’s fundamentals Sui’s technical architecture—object‑centric state, Move safety guarantees, and parallel execution—positions it for low‑latency apps. Still, markets pay for results: fees earned, users retained, and capital that sticks without emissions. Signals traders weigh more than headlines TVL composition. A spike in total value locked that reverses when incentives end is discounted. Inspect Sui’s DeFi stack via DefiLlama to see protocol mix and stickiness. Fee capture and unit economics. Low fees can be a feature for users but leave little accrual to the token. Watch whether throughput translates into meaningful gas revenue over time (via explorers and protocol analytics). Stablecoin footprint. A growing, native stablecoin base often precedes durable liquidity and payments use cases. Track circulating amounts and bridge flows. User retention and cohort quality. Daily active users can be noisy. Cohort retention, unique payers, and repeat interactions matter more than one‑off spikes. Valuation lenses help translate on‑chain data into a price view. FDV/TVL and MC/TVL. High multiples imply the market is paying forward for growth; low multiples can reflect skepticism around TVL quality. Avoid single‑metric conclusions—context matters. Fees/FDV. If fee growth lags issuance, traders hesitate to expand multiples. Peer comparisons sharpen this signal. You can find price and supply references on CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap , then layer in TVL and fee data from DefiLlama and chain explorers. Pro tip: Build a simple dashboard that logs weekly TVL, active addresses, stablecoin supply, and fee revenue. Markets often rerate when these trend together for several weeks—not on a single headline. Ecosystem depth and developer pipeline: are killer apps close? Developer momentum can be a leading indicator for L1 value—if it translates into sticky users. Sui’s Move language and object model attract builders in gaming, NFTs, DeFi, and payments. The question traders ask: which category will deliver retention and fees? What would look like genuine product‑market fit Non‑incentivized growth in a flagship app—consistent DAUs without farm‑and‑dump behavior. Cross‑ecosystem network effects: wallets, payments gateways, and marketplaces expanding Sui integrations. Low churn in liquidity after incentives roll off. If deposits stay put and spreads remain tight, it signals utility. Follow the Sui Foundation’s ecosystem updates and developer docs for a sense of pipeline and tooling maturity: sui.io and docs.sui.io . While hackathons and grants matter, traders ultimately price recurring usage more than announcements. Liquidity, derivatives, and who actually moves SUI Even the best fundamentals can be muted by market structure. Many L1s are steered by where perps funding, basis, and market‑maker inventory sit. Microstructure checklist Order book depth and spreads. Thin books make it easier for relatively small flows to push price. Check exchange depth via aggregator dashboards and exchange UIs listed on CoinGecko markets . Funding and open interest. Persistent negative funding with rising OI can signal crowded shorts; positive funding in downtrends can indicate trapped longs. Cross‑venue liquidity. If most volume is concentrated on a single venue, outages or policy changes can shock price. Foundation and market‑maker flows. Official disclosures and wallet tags (when available) help infer non‑retail supply. Pro tip: If you trade SUI around unlocks or ecosystem announcements, watch perps basis into the event. A basis compression ahead of news often foreshadows sell‑the‑fact behavior. Benchmarking Sui against Solana, Aptos, and Near L1 capital rotates. Traders measure SUI against peers competing for similar use cases and capital pools. The comparative scorecard commonly includes: Throughput under real load and fees. What users actually pay during peak activity is more informative than lab demos. Stablecoin settlement layer. The scale and velocity of stablecoin transfers often map to deeper liquidity and stickier users. Ecosystem concentration. A chain dominated by 1–2 protocols can be fragile; diversified categories reduce single‑app risk. Uptime and operational incidents. Reliability supports consumer‑facing apps; traders price in platform risk premiums when uncertainty rises. Developer mindshare and tooling. Documentation quality, SDKs, and audit pipelines affect the rate at which new apps ship safely. Relative value desks sometimes express these views via pairs: long a perceived winner (e.g., SOL, NEAR, or APT) and short a laggard such as SUI when spreads widen. These flows can maintain pressure even if SUI improves on the margin—until the data convincingly flips. Structuring trades and managing risk around the SUI narrative This is not financial advice, but there are common, risk‑first practices when trading L1 rotations: Use ratio charts and moving averages to define the trend. For example, wait for SUI/SOL to reclaim and hold a rising weekly average before scaling exposure. Map the unlock calendar on your trading diary. Reduce leverage ahead of large cliffs or add hedges if you’re long. Favor spot or low‑leverage positions when liquidity is thin. Poor depth increases slippage and liquidation risk. Size against volatility. If SUI’s realized volatility exceeds peers, cut position size or widen stops accordingly. Track perp funding and OI. Consider fading extremes when they align with on‑chain improvements (e.g., negative funding while TVL, fees, and stablecoin supply rise together). Demand confirmation. A single headline should not override weak trend structure. Look for several weeks of improving data. Pro tip: If you prefer to avoid shorting, express relative views by overweighting the stronger L1s while holding a smaller core in SUI as an option on improvement. What could flip the narrative from laggard to leader Underperformance can end quickly if credible catalysts arrive. Watch for developments that address what traders currently discount: Flagship consumer app with organic retention. A breakout game, social app, or payments product that maintains users after incentives lapse. Fee and burn dynamics that improve unit economics. Any governance‑approved changes or ecosystem patterns that route more value to the token without harming UX. Stablecoin and payments growth. New native stablecoin issuers, merchant integrations, or cross‑border corridors building atop Sui. Deeper liquidity partnerships. More diversified market‑maker support or additional high‑quality exchange listings can smooth flows. Security and reliability milestones. Third‑party audits, formal verification progress in Move tooling, and consistent uptime build confidence. Ecosystem breadth. More balanced TVL across DEXs, lending, liquid staking, and perps reduces reliance on one protocol’s incentives. Price often anticipates catalysts. If you see multiple green shoots—retention, fee growth, and stablecoin inflows—arriving together, that’s when relative strength can flip faster than narratives do. If you want steady coverage of Sui and other Layer‑1 narratives, Crypto Daily tracks both charts and fundamentals as stories evolve. Visit Crypto Daily for weekly market updates. Frequently Asked Questions What makes Sui different from other Layer‑1s? Sui uses the Move language with an object‑centric data model and parallel execution aimed at high throughput and low latency for certain transaction types. These design choices can benefit gaming, NFTs, and other interactive apps. Explore the technical overview at docs.sui.io . Why can SUI underperform even if TVL is growing? Markets discount incentive‑driven TVL and focus on stickiness, fees, and real users. If traders believe TVL will rotate out after rewards or that upcoming supply unlocks will meet thin demand, the token can lag peers despite bigger headline TVL. How do token unlocks and emissions affect SUI’s price? Vesting releases and staking rewards increase circulating supply over time. If new buyers don’t absorb that supply, price pressure can persist. Traders monitor unlock calendars (e.g., on TokenUnlocks ) and often de‑risk into large cliffs. Does staking protect against dilution? Staking yields offset some dilution, but what matters is the real yield after inflation. If nominal APY is 7% and effective dilution is similar or higher, your purchasing power may not improve. Also consider validator risk and lockup mechanics. Which metrics should I track weekly to see if SUI’s relative strength is improving? Create a simple checklist: SUI/SOL and SUI/BTC ratio trends; TVL by category on DefiLlama ; stablecoin supply on Sui; active addresses and fee revenue via the Sui Explorer ; perp funding and open interest on major exchanges; and the near‑term unlock calendar. Could regulation uniquely impact SUI versus other L1s? Regulatory outcomes are uncertain and jurisdiction‑specific. Traders generally price headline risk across L1s rather than chain‑specific unless particular facts emerge. It’s prudent to monitor official communications from the Sui Foundation and major exchanges for listing or compliance updates. Where can I find consolidated data on SUI price and liquidity? Price, markets, and supply snapshots are available on CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap . Combine those with on‑chain views from the Sui Explorer for a fuller picture. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

27 May 2026, 15:35

Crypto IPOs could create massive $1 trillion market amid tokenization wave, Jefferies says

The Wall Street investment bank expects a wave of crypto and blockchain public listings over the next two years as institutional investors shift their focus from speculative trading to real-world financial infrastructure.