hodler

28 Apr 2026, 05:12

TRON DAO Joins The Programmable Economy: AI & Blockchain Redefining Markets Conference at Cornell Tech

Geneva, Switzerland, April 27, 2026 — TRON DAO , the community-governed DAO dedicated to accelerating the decentralization of the internet through blockchain technology and decentralized applications (dApps), participated in The Programmable Economy: AI & Blockchain Redefining Markets Conference, held on April 24 at Cornell Tech in New York City. Co-hosted by Cornell Blockchain, Blockchain Builders, Blockchain at Cornell Tech, and the Cornell Tech AI Society, the conference brought together a coalition of students, operators, and technologists focused on advancing frontier technologies in New York City. The event convened over 1,000 attendees, including speakers and participants from the AI, blockchain, finance, and government sectors, bringing together industry leaders and academia to explore the real-world impact of these technologies on global markets. Sam Elfarra, Community Spokesperson at TRON DAO, joined a panel titled “CeFi & DeFi Markets” on the Cornell Tech Sidestage (TATA). Moderated by Max Tang of Cornell Blockchain, the session brought together David Gan, Founder of Inception Capital; Ayesha Kiani, Chief Operating Officer of Monarq Asset Management; and Alex Weseley, Research Team Lead at Artemis Analytics, to examine the evolving relationship between centralized and decentralized financial markets, and how emerging infrastructure is reshaping liquidity, access, and capital formation. “DeFi is no longer a parallel system; it is slowly integrating as part of the same financial fabric that institutions operate within,” said Elfarra. “On TRON, we’re seeing firsthand how high-throughput and cost-efficient infrastructure for stablecoin settlement can serve both TradFi and DeFi at scale. As traditional finance and decentralized markets grow closer together, the networks that can support both worlds reliably will define where the industry goes next.” TRON DAO’s participation at the 2026 AI & Blockchain Redefining Markets Conference builds on its expanding commitment to academic engagement through the TRON Academy initiative, a global program designed to bridge the gap between blockchain education and real-world industry applications. TRON DAO’s growing university network now includes Cornell University, Columbia University, Harvard University, Imperial College London, Yale University, MIT, Princeton University, Dartmouth College, the University of California, Berkeley, the University of Oxford, and the University of Cambridge. TRON DAO’s participation reflects its ongoing commitment to engaging the next generation of blockchain and AI innovators. As the digital asset landscape continues to evolve, TRON DAO remains focused on fostering collaboration between industry and academia to support the development of a more open, accessible, and innovative decentralized ecosystem. For more information about TRON’s initiatives and upcoming events, please visit TRON DAO’s official website. About TRON DAO TRON DAO is a community-governed DAO dedicated to accelerating the decentralization of the internet via blockchain technology and dApps. Founded in September 2017 by H.E. Justin Sun, the TRON blockchain has experienced significant growth since its MainNet launch in May 2018. Until recently, TRON hosted the largest circulating supply of USD Tether (USDT) stablecoin, which currently exceeds $86 billion. As of April 2026, the TRON blockchain has recorded over 378 million in total user accounts, more than 13 billion in total transactions, and over $27 billion in total value locked (TVL), based on TRONSCAN. Recognized as the global settlement layer for stablecoin transactions and everyday purchases with proven success, TRON is “Moving Trillions, Empowering Billions.” TRONNetwork | TRONDAO | X | YouTube | Telegram | Discord | Reddit | GitHub | Medium | Forum Media Contact Yeweon Park [email protected]

28 Apr 2026, 05:10

eCash Hard Fork Controversy: Satoshi Coin Redistribution Plan Sparks Outrage

BitcoinWorld eCash Hard Fork Controversy: Satoshi Coin Redistribution Plan Sparks Outrage The cryptocurrency community faces a new rift. A proposed Bitcoin hard fork, named eCash , draws sharp criticism. The controversy centers on its plan to redistribute Satoshi Nakamoto’s coins. Developer Paul Sztorc promotes this fork. The scheduled August airdrop will give eCash to BTC holders at a 1:1 ratio. Critics call this an act of theft. They view it as a direct disrespect to Bitcoin’s anonymous creator. Understanding the eCash Hard Fork and Its Distribution Plan The eCash hard fork aims to create a new version of Bitcoin. Its distribution plan includes a significant allocation. Specifically, 600,000 eCash tokens will be based on the 1.1 million BTC believed to be held by Satoshi Nakamoto. This move does not involve taking Satoshi’s actual BTC. However, many see it as a symbolic violation. The plan effectively assigns value to coins that remain untouched for over a decade. Key Details of the eCash Airdrop Ratio: 1:1 airdrop for all existing BTC holders. Allocation: 600,000 eCash for Satoshi’s estimated 1.1 million BTC. Date: Scheduled for August of this year. Promoter: Paul Sztorc, a known Bitcoin developer. Growing Criticism and Community Backlash Industry figures condemn the Satoshi coins redistribution plan. They argue it violates a fundamental principle. Satoshi’s coins should remain untouched as a historical artifact. Many see this as a disrespectful move. It undermines the trust and neutrality of the blockchain. The backlash grows louder as the fork date approaches. Why Critics Call It Theft Critics argue that assigning eCash to Satoshi’s address implies ownership. This creates a moral hazard. It sets a dangerous precedent for future forks. The move could encourage similar actions. It might erode the perceived value of Bitcoin’s original chain. Some experts warn it could lead to legal challenges. Background: Paul Sztorc and the eCash Project Paul Sztorc has a history in Bitcoin development. He previously worked on sidechain projects. His current project, eCash, aims to improve transaction speed and privacy. However, the distribution plan overshadows these technical goals. Sztorc defends the move as fair. He claims it treats all BTC holders equally. Yet, this explanation fails to satisfy critics. Technical Aspects of the Fork Feature eCash Bitcoin Consensus Proof-of-Work Proof-of-Work Block Time 2 minutes 10 minutes Privacy Enhanced Pseudonymous Supply 21 million 21 million Impact on the Cryptocurrency Ecosystem The Bitcoin hard fork controversy affects market sentiment. It creates uncertainty for investors. The move could influence other fork projects. It may also trigger regulatory scrutiny. The community remains divided. Some see it as innovation. Others view it as a betrayal of core values. Timeline of Events March: eCash proposal announced. April: Criticism begins from key industry figures. May: Community debates the ethical implications. June: Technical details released. August: Fork and airdrop scheduled. Expert Perspectives on the Fork Several blockchain analysts weigh in. They highlight the risks. One expert notes, ‘This creates a dangerous precedent.’ Another warns, ‘It could lead to legal battles over Satoshi’s estate.’ The lack of clear ownership adds complexity. The community watches closely. Many await a formal response from major exchanges. Potential Consequences Exchanges may refuse to list eCash. This would limit its adoption. Investors could face confusion. The fork might also spark a chain reaction. Other developers could follow suit. This could fragment the Bitcoin ecosystem further. Conclusion The eCash hard fork plan to redistribute Satoshi’s coins faces intense scrutiny. The controversy highlights deep divisions within the crypto community. It raises questions about ethics, ownership, and the future of Bitcoin forks. The outcome remains uncertain. However, one thing is clear: this move challenges long-held norms. It will have lasting implications for the cryptocurrency landscape. FAQs Q1: What is the eCash hard fork? A1: It is a proposed split from Bitcoin. It creates a new cryptocurrency called eCash. The fork includes a plan to redistribute coins based on Satoshi Nakamoto’s BTC holdings. Q2: Why is the Satoshi coin redistribution controversial? A2: Critics view it as theft and disrespect. They argue that Satoshi’s coins should remain untouched. The move sets a dangerous precedent for future forks. Q3: Who is behind the eCash project? A3: Developer Paul Sztorc promotes the fork. He has a background in Bitcoin development and sidechain projects. Q4: When will the eCash airdrop happen? A4: The airdrop is scheduled for August of this year. It will distribute eCash to BTC holders at a 1:1 ratio. Q5: How does this affect Bitcoin holders? A5: Bitcoin holders will receive eCash tokens. However, the controversy may affect market sentiment. It could also influence how exchanges handle the fork. This post eCash Hard Fork Controversy: Satoshi Coin Redistribution Plan Sparks Outrage first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

28 Apr 2026, 05:08

Dogecoin (DOGE) Trends Higher, Larger Gains Could Be Ahead

Dogecoin started a fresh increase from the $0.0970 zone against the US Dollar. DOGE is now facing hurdles near $0.0995 and might aim for a larger rally. DOGE price started a decent upward move above $0.0950 and $0.0985. The price is trading above the $0.0980 level and the 100-hourly simple moving average. There is a key bullish trend line forming with support at $0.0978 on the hourly chart of the DOGE/USD pair (data source from Kraken). The price could continue to move up if it stays above $0.0970. Dogecoin Price Hits Resistance Dogecoin price remained supported above the $0.0950 zone and started a fresh increase, beating Bitcoin and Ethereum . DOGE climbed above the $0.0980 and $0.0985 resistance levels. There was a decent upward move above the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $0.1008 swing high to the $0.0969 low. However, the bears remained active near the $0.0995 zone. Besides, there is a key bullish trend line forming with support at $0.0978 on the hourly chart of the DOGE/USD pair. Dogecoin price is now trading above the $0.0970 level and the 100-hourly simple moving average. If the bulls remain active, the price could attempt another increase. Immediate resistance on the upside is near the $0.0995 level or the 61.8% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $0.1008 swing high to the $0.0969 low. The first major resistance for the bulls could be near the $0.10 level. The next major resistance is near the $0.1050 level. A close above the $0.1050 resistance might send the price toward the $0.1120 resistance. Any more gains might send the price toward the $0.120 level. The next major stop for the bulls might be $0.1250. Another Decline In DOGE? If DOGE’s price fails to climb above the $0.0995 level, it could continue to move down. Initial support on the downside is near the $0.0975 level or the trend line. The next major support is near the $0.0970 level. The main support sits at $0.0950. If there is a downside break below the $0.0950 support, the price could decline further. In the stated case, the price might slide toward the $0.0920 level or even $0.090 in the near term. Technical Indicators Hourly MACD – The MACD for DOGE/USD is now gaining momentum in the bullish zone. Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for DOGE/USD is now above the 50 level. Major Support Levels – $0.0970 and $0.0950. Major Resistance Levels – $0.0995 and $0.10.

28 Apr 2026, 05:00

Monero To $1,160? Analyst Sees Major XMR Rally Ahead

Cryptoinsightuk analyst Will Taylor says Monero’s multi-year structure could support a move toward the $1,000 area and potentially as high as $1,160 if the current weekly trend holds. Taylor shared a weekly XMR chart on X and tied the setup to a broader thesis around privacy coins, arguing that Monero’s market structure has continued to improve despite the regulatory and exchange pressure facing privacy-focused assets. “Looking to see if this trend continues or not. Structural higher lows and higher highs, with volatility of the upside moves increasing. I’m thinking a TP below / around the psychological level of $1,000,” Taylor wrote. He added that the more aggressive target sits above that level. “We still have today to confirm on the weekly of course, but just an idea. There is also an argument for the $1,160 region that would align with the 2.618 fib level.” The Thesis Behind Monero The chart shows Monero trading near $388 against USDT on KuCoin. The projected move toward the $1,160 area would imply a gain of around 200% from the highlighted region, according to the chart’s measurement. Taylor’s market-cap chart also shows XMR around $7.15 billion, with Fibonacci extension levels mapped above the current range. Related Reading: Monero Triggers Retail Alert That Preceded ZEC And DASH Drops As Privacy Coin Hype Returns Taylor’s thesis is not based only on near-term price structure. In a longer note from The Weekly Insight, he framed Monero as a bet on the persistence of crypto privacy demand, even as regulators and exchanges have moved against privacy tokens. “The next token I want to look at is XMR (Monero). There’s been an international push to essentially halt privacy tokens like Monero, Dash, and others, due to their ability to make transactions difficult, if not impossible, to trace. I’d like to remind everyone that this was the original vision for crypto—an anonymous, decentralized financial system.” That framing is central to his argument. For Taylor, delistings and regulatory scrutiny do not eliminate the market for privacy assets; they may instead sharpen the divide between assets optimized for compliance visibility and assets built around transaction confidentiality. “Although privacy tokens are being delisted from exchanges, there is still a valid market for them, regardless of how large that market may be. Many people, myself included, value privacy and believe that it will continue to play a significant role in the future of crypto.” Related Reading: Monero (XMR) Rockets 51% To New ATH, But Watch Out For FOMO Taylor also focused on market capitalization rather than price alone, noting that Monero’s current market cap is around $6 billion in his analysis. He said Fibonacci extensions suggest the asset’s valuation could rise materially if the setup develops as expected. “Using Fibonacci extensions, we could see its market cap rise to $35 billion,” he wrote. “Since it has been delisted from many exchanges recently, it’s important to consider market cap as a key factor.” Taylor described Monero’s history as a major expansion from early lows followed by years of consolidation or accumulation, which he sees as a possible base for a larger upside move. “This, to me, suggests that we could see explosive price action to the upside in the future. I believe the narrative for privacy tokens is strong and growing, especially as mainstream adoption increases and surveillance in the crypto space tightens. Privacy is likely to become a critical part of the market in the years to come.” At press time, XMR traded at $387.97. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

28 Apr 2026, 04:42

Bitcoin pressured by Fed uncertainty, oil, and AI slowdown

Enflux points to oil-driven inflation as the main constraint, while questions around AI demand could reshape miner selling in the months ahead.

28 Apr 2026, 04:40

Chinese Bitcoin Mining Takeovers: US Lawmaker Pushes Urgent Bill to Block Strategic Threat

BitcoinWorld Chinese Bitcoin Mining Takeovers: US Lawmaker Pushes Urgent Bill to Block Strategic Threat A United States lawmaker is pushing a new bill to restrict Chinese investors from acquiring American Bitcoin mining companies. Representative Zach Nunn, a Republican from Iowa, made the announcement at the 2026 Bitcoin Conference. He warned that recent Chinese capital activity in the sector poses a direct threat to US strategic interests in digital assets. The proposed legislation targets Chinese takeovers of Bitcoin miners specifically. Understanding the Chinese Bitcoin Mining Takeover Bill Representative Nunn revealed that Chinese investors have recently been actively pursuing acquisitions of US-based Bitcoin mining firms. He argued that if Chinese capital secures a majority stake in these companies, it could significantly weaken America’s position in the global digital asset sector. The bill aims to establish a review process for foreign investments in Bitcoin mining infrastructure. This move aligns with broader US efforts to secure critical technology supply chains. Why Bitcoin Mining Infrastructure Matters for National Security Bitcoin mining is not just about creating new coins. It requires massive energy consumption, advanced semiconductor chips, and data center operations. These resources are increasingly viewed as strategic assets. Control over mining capacity gives influence over the Bitcoin network’s hash rate and transaction validation. US policymakers now see mining facilities as part of the national energy and technology infrastructure. Chinese ownership of these facilities could create vulnerabilities in energy grids and data security. Recent Examples of Chinese Investment in US Mining Several reports indicate that Chinese entities have attempted to acquire stakes in major US mining operations over the past year. These include partnerships with publicly traded mining companies and private data center operators. The transactions often involve complex corporate structures designed to obscure the ultimate beneficial ownership. US intelligence agencies have flagged these activities as potential risks. The new bill would require public disclosure of foreign ownership in mining companies. Key Provisions of the Proposed Legislation Mandatory review of any foreign investment exceeding 10% ownership in a US Bitcoin mining company. Enhanced disclosure requirements for mining firms regarding their capital sources and supply chains. National security assessment by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Penalties for non-compliance, including potential forced divestiture of Chinese-owned stakes. Reporting obligations for mining companies to track equipment sourced from Chinese manufacturers. Impact on the US Bitcoin Mining Industry The proposed bill could reshape the competitive landscape for American miners. Many US mining firms currently rely on Chinese-made ASIC miners and infrastructure components. Restricting Chinese investment might accelerate domestic manufacturing of mining hardware. It could also drive up operational costs for miners who depend on Chinese capital for expansion. However, supporters argue that the long-term strategic benefits outweigh short-term economic disruptions. The bill would also encourage partnerships with allied nations like Canada and Australia. Expert Perspectives on the Legislation Industry analysts have offered mixed reactions to the proposal. Some argue that Chinese investment brings capital and technical expertise that benefits the US mining ecosystem. Others point out that China’s state-owned enterprises have a history of using investments for intelligence gathering and technology transfer. A former CFIUS official noted that similar restrictions already apply to telecommunications and energy sectors. Extending these rules to Bitcoin mining is a logical step, the expert said. The debate highlights the tension between free market principles and national security concerns. Timeline of US-China Tensions in Crypto Mining Year Event 2021 China bans all cryptocurrency mining, forcing miners to relocate overseas. 2022 US becomes the world’s largest Bitcoin mining hub, attracting Chinese miners. 2023 US regulators investigate Chinese-linked mining operations in Texas and New York. 2024 Congress holds hearings on foreign ownership of US mining infrastructure. 2025 Representative Nunn introduces the Bitcoin Mining Security Act. Broader Implications for Global Crypto Policy This bill is part of a larger trend of nations asserting sovereignty over digital asset infrastructure. The European Union has already implemented similar rules for foreign investments in crypto mining. Japan and South Korea are also reviewing their policies. If passed, the US law could set a precedent for other countries to follow. It would signal that Bitcoin mining is now considered a critical national infrastructure sector. This could lead to a fragmentation of the global mining industry along geopolitical lines. What This Means for Investors and Miners Investors in US mining stocks should monitor the bill’s progress closely. The legislation could increase compliance costs and reduce the pool of available capital. Miners may need to restructure their ownership and supply chains to comply. Some firms might relocate operations to jurisdictions with fewer restrictions. However, the bill could also create opportunities for domestic hardware manufacturers and energy providers. The long-term effect will depend on how the legislation is implemented and enforced. Conclusion Representative Zach Nunn’s proposed bill represents a significant shift in US policy toward Bitcoin mining. By targeting Chinese takeovers of Bitcoin miners, the legislation aims to protect American strategic interests in the digital asset sector. The bill highlights the growing recognition of mining infrastructure as critical national infrastructure. While it may create short-term challenges for the industry, supporters believe it will strengthen US leadership in the long run. The debate over this bill will likely intensify as it moves through Congress. FAQs Q1: What does the bill aim to do? The bill aims to restrict Chinese investors from acquiring majority stakes in US Bitcoin mining companies. It requires mandatory review of foreign investments and enhanced disclosure of ownership structures. Q2: Why is Chinese investment in Bitcoin mining considered a threat? Chinese ownership of mining infrastructure could give the Chinese government influence over US energy grids, data centers, and the Bitcoin network’s hash rate. It also raises concerns about technology transfer and espionage. Q3: How would the bill affect existing Chinese-owned mining operations? Existing operations would likely face enhanced scrutiny and may be required to divest Chinese ownership stakes. Non-compliance could result in penalties or forced divestiture. Q4: What is the role of CFIUS in this legislation? CFIUS would be responsible for reviewing foreign investments in Bitcoin mining companies. The committee already reviews foreign investments in other critical infrastructure sectors. Q5: Could this bill hurt the US Bitcoin mining industry? In the short term, it could reduce capital availability and increase costs. However, supporters argue it will strengthen the industry’s long-term security and encourage domestic manufacturing. Q6: When will the bill be voted on? The bill has been introduced but has not yet been scheduled for a vote. It will first go through committee hearings before reaching the full House of Representatives. This post Chinese Bitcoin Mining Takeovers: US Lawmaker Pushes Urgent Bill to Block Strategic Threat first appeared on BitcoinWorld .