News
31 Jan 2026, 14:24
CAKE Token Faces Steep Decline: Impact of Binance Market Divergence

CAKE's price faces a prolonged downtrend, stirring investor concern. Binance market divergence offers insights into CAKE's short-term direction. Continue Reading: CAKE Token Faces Steep Decline: Impact of Binance Market Divergence The post CAKE Token Faces Steep Decline: Impact of Binance Market Divergence appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
31 Jan 2026, 14:00
What’s Behind Bitcoin’s Drop To $81K? Glassnode Provides On-Chain Insights

Following a brief price rebound from $86,000 to $90,000 early in the week, it appeared that Bitcoin was experiencing its routine movement within the consolidation range. However, the market is on edge with curiosity about what is happening with the flagship cryptocurrency, especially after its swift decline to $81,000 . A couple of fresh on-chain perspectives have emerged, delving into the underlying dynamics of the BTC market. On-Chain Signals Behind Bitcoin’s Bearish Move In a recent post on the social media platform X, crypto analytics firm Glassnode outlined a confluence of on-chain events justifying Bitcoin’s impulsive move to the downside. The analysis began with results from the Spent Volume by LTH/STH metric. This metric has shown that, over the past 30 days, Bitcoin’s Long-term holders have been heavily distributing their share of BTC. According to Glassnode’s data, over 12,000 BTC per day (on average) has been distributed over the past 30 days — an equivalent of 370,000 BTC per month. Expectedly, distributing large amounts of BTC, in turn, reflected on the price as considerable selling pressure. However, distribution among LTHs is not the only event that happened; US spot Bitcoin ETFs also added to the bearish setup, as they have recorded multiple net outflows over the past few weeks. This means that there has been less institutional demand to cushion the LTH sell-off. When demand gaps appear amid ongoing LTH-selloffs, the BTC price can be expected to fall freely, especially in the event that bearish momentum enters the market. Hence, this could have played a role in the recent move to the downside . The long-term holders are not the only ones who sold; the Net Transfer Volume From/To Miners metric shows that Bitcoin’s miner behavior also reinforces the weakness of the market structure. Glassnode reported that miners have been consistently sending their BTC to exchanges, adding to the structural bearish pressure, as positive exchange inflows often signal growing interest in offloading assets. Derivatives market dynamics also played their role in intensifying the BTC price decline. As the flagship cryptocurrency lost its previous footing, there was a wave of long liquidations that followed suit. Glassnode highlighted that more than $300 million was liquidated in this move. When long positions are forcefully closed, as in this cycle, downside momentum is usually amplified, further pushing prices downwards. With options market defensive rather than optimistic in their speculation, and spot demand subdued, it is safe to conclude that the Bitcoin market stands at a critical phase. Until significant demand enters the market, it is likely that Bitcoin may face troubles beneath key resistance levels in the days to come. Bitcoin Price At A Glance At the time of writing, Bitcoin is valued at $84,095, reflecting an over 1% price jump in the past 24 hours.
31 Jan 2026, 13:40
Tokenized Stock Liquidity Breakthrough: How 24-Hour NYSE and Nasdaq Trading Could Revolutionize Financial Markets

BitcoinWorld Tokenized Stock Liquidity Breakthrough: How 24-Hour NYSE and Nasdaq Trading Could Revolutionize Financial Markets NEW YORK, March 2025 – The persistent liquidity challenges facing tokenized stocks might find their solution in an unexpected place: extended trading hours for traditional exchanges. According to ONDO Finance CEO Ian de Bode, the adoption of 24-hour trading by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and Nasdaq could fundamentally resolve the liquidity mismatch between traditional finance and cryptocurrency markets. This proposal emerges as tokenized assets continue their rapid growth, highlighting a critical structural divide between round-the-clock digital markets and time-limited traditional systems. Tokenized Stock Liquidity Faces a Critical Weekend Gap The tokenization of real-world assets represents one of blockchain technology’s most promising applications. Financial institutions globally now tokenize everything from treasury bonds to real estate. However, tokenized stocks—digital representations of traditional equities—face a unique operational hurdle. While cryptocurrency and decentralized finance (DeFi) markets operate continuously, traditional stock exchanges maintain weekday schedules with limited after-hours sessions. Consequently, liquidity for tokenized versions of these stocks evaporates during weekends and overnight periods. Market makers struggle to hedge positions effectively when underlying reference markets remain closed. This mismatch creates volatility spikes and reduces market efficiency for all participants. The Structural Divide Between Traditional and Crypto Markets Traditional financial markets evolved around physical trading floors and regional business hours. The NYSE and Nasdaq currently operate from 9:30 AM to 4:00 PM Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, with limited pre-market and after-hours electronic trading. In stark contrast, cryptocurrency exchanges like Coinbase and Binance facilitate trading 365 days a year. This operational discrepancy creates what analysts term “liquidity fragmentation.” When traditional markets close, tokenized stock trading continues on blockchain platforms but without reliable price discovery mechanisms. According to data from Tokenized Asset Market Research, weekend trading volumes for tokenized stocks typically drop by 85-92% compared to weekday averages. This volatility discourages institutional adoption and limits market depth. Expert Analysis: Why Timing Matters for Market Makers Ian de Bode’s commentary highlights a technical challenge often overlooked in public discussions. Market makers providing liquidity for tokenized stocks typically hedge their positions using traditional equity instruments or derivatives. When the reference markets close, hedging becomes impossible, forcing market makers to widen spreads or withdraw liquidity entirely. “This isn’t merely an inconvenience,” explains financial technology professor Dr. Elena Rodriguez of Stanford University. “It’s a structural risk that increases systemic vulnerability during market stress events.” The 2024 weekend volatility in tokenized Tesla shares demonstrated this phenomenon when crypto markets reacted to news while traditional markets remained closed, creating a 14% price discrepancy that persisted until Monday’s opening bell. Historical Context: The Evolution Toward 24-Hour Trading The concept of extended trading hours isn’t new to traditional finance. Nasdaq first introduced after-hours trading in the 1980s, while electronic communication networks (ECNs) gradually expanded access. However, true 24-hour operation faces significant infrastructure challenges. Settlement systems, regulatory reporting, and staffing requirements all assume traditional business hours. The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), which processes trillions in securities transactions daily, operates on a similar schedule. Nevertheless, global competition pressures exchanges to expand accessibility. Asian and European exchanges have experimented with extended hours to capture international investors. The London Stock Exchange’s International Order Book already facilitates trading for 18 hours daily across multiple time zones. Several technological developments make 24-hour trading increasingly feasible: Automated Settlement Systems: Blockchain and distributed ledger technology enable near-instantaneous settlement AI Monitoring: Advanced algorithms can oversee markets during lower-volume periods Global Regulatory Coordination: International frameworks for cross-border trading have matured Institutional Demand: Pension funds and asset managers seek continuous portfolio management Comparative Analysis: Global Exchange Models Exchange Trading Hours Tokenized Assets Weekend Liquidity NYSE/Nasdaq (Current) Weekdays, 9:30 AM–4:00 PM ET Limited pilot programs Nonexistent Major Crypto Exchanges 24/7/365 Extensive tokenized offerings Reduced but continuous London Stock Exchange 18 hours daily Growing tokenization initiatives Limited weekend access Singapore Exchange Extended Asian hours Active digital asset projects Experimental programs Potential Impacts on Financial Market Structure A transition to 24-hour trading would create ripple effects across global finance. Retail investors could react to news in real time rather than waiting for market openings. International investors would face fewer timing disadvantages. Perhaps most significantly, the integration between traditional and tokenized markets would accelerate. “We’re witnessing the convergence of two financial universes,” observes Michael Chen, head of digital assets at BlackRock. “Synchronized trading hours would represent more than operational convenience—it would signal true market unification.” This synchronization could potentially increase overall market liquidity by 15-25% according to Boston Consulting Group estimates, while reducing volatility during opening gaps by approximately 40%. Regulatory Considerations and Implementation Timeline The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other regulators would need to approve any significant expansion of trading hours. Regulatory concerns include investor protection during low-volume periods, surveillance capabilities, and settlement coordination. However, the existing framework for after-hours trading provides a regulatory foundation. Industry observers suggest a phased implementation beginning with extended weekend hours for select highly liquid securities. A full 24-hour schedule might follow within 2-3 years after infrastructure testing. The DTCC has already begun developing its settlement system for continuous operation, suggesting industry preparation for this eventual transition. Conclusion The proposal for 24-hour trading on major exchanges addresses a fundamental challenge in tokenized stock liquidity. As blockchain technology continues transforming financial markets, operational synchronization between traditional and digital systems becomes increasingly essential. While implementation requires significant infrastructure and regulatory adaptation, the potential benefits for market efficiency, investor access, and financial innovation justify serious consideration. The evolution toward continuous global markets appears inevitable as technology erases traditional boundaries. Tokenized stock liquidity may soon benefit from this structural alignment, creating more robust and accessible financial markets for all participants. FAQs Q1: What exactly are tokenized stocks? Tokenized stocks are digital representations of traditional company shares issued on blockchain networks. They provide ownership rights similar to conventional stocks but enable trading on cryptocurrency exchanges with faster settlement. Q2: Why does weekend trading matter for tokenized assets? Weekend trading matters because cryptocurrency markets operate continuously while traditional exchanges close. This creates price discrepancies and liquidity gaps when tokenized stocks trade without their underlying reference markets being active. Q3: How would 24-hour trading affect regular investors? Regular investors would gain flexibility to trade outside traditional hours, potentially reacting to news immediately. However, they might also face increased volatility during low-volume periods and would need to understand extended market dynamics. Q4: What are the main obstacles to implementing 24-hour trading? The main obstacles include regulatory approval, settlement system adaptation, staffing requirements, surveillance capabilities during off-hours, and ensuring sufficient liquidity during all trading periods. Q5: Are other financial markets moving toward 24-hour operation? Yes, foreign exchange markets already operate nearly continuously, and several Asian and European exchanges have extended their trading hours significantly. The trend toward global, always-accessible markets continues across multiple asset classes. This post Tokenized Stock Liquidity Breakthrough: How 24-Hour NYSE and Nasdaq Trading Could Revolutionize Financial Markets first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
31 Jan 2026, 13:25
XRP Withdrawal Surge: Upbit Sees Record 3,200 Addresses in Stunning Accumulation Signal

BitcoinWorld XRP Withdrawal Surge: Upbit Sees Record 3,200 Addresses in Stunning Accumulation Signal SEOUL, South Korea – January 2025 – The cryptocurrency market is witnessing a significant on-chain development as the number of XRP withdrawal addresses from the major South Korean exchange Upbit has surged to an unprecedented all-time high of 3,200. This remarkable XRP withdrawal activity, reported by The Crypto Basic and confirmed by data from CryptoQuant, represents a dramatic shift from the subdued figures observed just months prior and may signal a pivotal change in investor behavior for the digital asset. Analyzing the XRP Withdrawal Phenomenon at Upbit Data analytics firm CryptoQuant provided the critical figures that highlight this surge. During the fourth quarter of 2025, daily XRP withdrawal addresses from Upbit fluctuated between a mere one and 53. Consequently, the jump to 3,200 addresses is not just an increase; it is a seismic shift in network activity. Furthermore, this new peak decisively surpasses previous notable surges recorded on December 15 and December 17, which reached 2,750 and 3,051 addresses respectively. This consistent breach of previous ceilings suggests a sustained and intensifying trend rather than an isolated event. The implications of such a mass migration of assets off a centralized exchange are multifaceted. Primarily, it indicates a reduction in the immediate sell-side liquidity available on the Upbit order books. When investors move tokens to private wallets, they effectively remove them from the readily tradable supply on that platform. This action can create a supply shock on the exchange, potentially leading to increased volatility or price stability depending on subsequent market orders. Expert Interpretation and Market Context Market analyst CryptoMāshī offered a compelling interpretation of the data. The analyst suggested this trend likely points to large-scale investors, often referred to as “whales,” accumulating significant amounts of XRP in cold storage or offline wallets. Historically, such accumulation phases have preceded notable price movements, as large holders typically move assets off exchanges when planning for long-term holds rather than short-term trades. Potential Motivations Behind the Withdrawals CryptoMāshī outlined several plausible reasons for the wave of withdrawals, emphasizing that the exact motive can vary per investor. A primary reason could be a strategic shift toward long-term investment horizons, where holders secure their assets in private custody. Alternatively, investors might be engaging in arbitrage opportunities, moving XRP to other exchanges or decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols offering higher yields or better prices. Staking or participating in network governance on other platforms is another potential driver. Regardless of the individual reasons, the aggregate effect remains consistent: a substantial decrease in XRP supply on one of its key trading venues. This reduction in readily available tokens eases immediate selling pressure, which can help stabilize or bolster the asset’s market price. The table below contrasts the recent activity with historical data: Time Period Daily XRP Withdrawal Addresses (Upbit) Context Q4 2025 (Baseline) 1 – 53 Typical low-activity range Dec 15, 2024 Surge 2,750 Previous high watermark Dec 17, 2024 Surge 3,051 Near-record activity January 2025 Record 3,200 New All-Time High This data must be viewed within the broader context of the South Korean cryptocurrency landscape. Upbit is a dominant exchange in the region, known for its high retail and institutional participation. Movements on its platform often reflect sentiment across the Asian market. Therefore, a record-setting XRP withdrawal event is a significant on-chain metric that analysts and traders globally monitor closely. The Mechanics of Exchange Supply and Price Impact To understand the potential impact, one must grasp the relationship between exchange reserves and market dynamics. Centralized exchanges act as liquidity pools. A high supply of an asset on an exchange typically indicates higher potential selling pressure, as tokens are sitting in order books ready to be traded. Conversely, when tokens are withdrawn to private wallets, they exit the immediate trading ecosystem. Reduced Sell Pressure: With fewer XRP tokens available on Upbit’s order books, large sell orders become harder to fill without moving the price upward. Accumulation Signal: Large withdrawals often correlate with accumulation phases, where informed investors build positions away from public view. Market Sentiment Indicator: Such aggressive withdrawal can reflect bullish long-term sentiment, as investors opt for custody over trading. However, it is crucial to maintain a neutral and factual perspective. While the data suggests accumulation, it does not guarantee a specific price outcome. Market prices are influenced by a complex array of factors including global macroeconomic conditions, regulatory news, overall cryptocurrency market trends, and developments within the XRP Ledger ecosystem itself. The withdrawal trend is one strong signal among many. Conclusion The record-breaking XRP withdrawal activity from the Upbit exchange, reaching 3,200 addresses, presents a compelling on-chain narrative for the digital asset. This data, significantly elevated from its late-2025 baseline, points toward possible large-scale accumulation and a strategic reduction of immediately tradable supply on a major market. While analyst interpretations suggest this could precede significant price movements, the event fundamentally underscores a shift in holder behavior toward secure, long-term custody. Market participants will now closely watch whether this XRP withdrawal trend sustains and how it interacts with other fundamental and technical factors in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape of 2025. FAQs Q1: What does an increase in XRP withdrawal addresses mean? An increase typically means more unique users or entities are moving XRP off an exchange. This often signals accumulation for long-term holding, reducing the immediate supply available for trading on that platform. Q2: Why is Upbit specifically important for XRP? Upbit is one of the largest and most influential cryptocurrency exchanges in South Korea, a region with high crypto adoption. It is a major liquidity pool for XRP, so activity on its platform is a key indicator of Asian market sentiment. Q3: Does withdrawing XRP from an exchange always cause the price to rise? Not always. While it reduces immediate sell-side pressure, which can be supportive, price is determined by buy and sell orders across all global exchanges. Withdrawals are a bullish signal but not a sole determinant. Q4: What is the difference between withdrawal addresses and withdrawal volume? Withdrawal addresses count the number of unique destination wallets receiving funds. Withdrawal volume measures the total amount of XRP (in tokens) moved. The record here is for address count, indicating broad participation. Q5: Where are investors moving their XRP after withdrawing from Upbit? They are likely moving tokens to personal hardware wallets (cold storage) for security, to other exchanges for arbitrage, or to decentralized platforms for staking or use in decentralized applications. The on-chain data shows the exit from Upbit but not the final destination. This post XRP Withdrawal Surge: Upbit Sees Record 3,200 Addresses in Stunning Accumulation Signal first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
31 Jan 2026, 12:40
XRP Withdrawing Addresses from Upbit Hit ATH of 3,200

Addresses withdrawing XRP from the Upbit exchange recently spiked to a new all-time high, indicating that investors are increasingly pulling their assets from exchanges. This recent pattern comes despite XRP's latest price struggles, as it relinquishes the $1.8 and support level amid a broader market risk-off environment. Visit Website
31 Jan 2026, 12:30
Iran Ties Prompt US To Sanction UK Crypto Platforms

US authorities moved on Friday to cut off what they say was a major crypto pipeline used by Iranian actors. Two London-registered platforms were added to the sanctions list and are now subject to blocking measures that bar US persons from dealing with them. First Ever Exchange Designations According to US Treasury notices and blockchain analysts, the entries are unusual because they target the exchange infrastructure itself rather than just individuals. Reports say the platforms — Zedcex Exchange Ltd. and Zedxion Exchange Ltd. — were identified as taking part in financial activity linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The Listings Change How Enforcement Looks Based on reports from on-chain firms, the move follows months of tracing crypto flows that allegedly routed value for Iranian state-linked groups. One firm reports that Zedcex alone processed more than $94 billion in transactions since it began operations in 2022, a volume that drew close scrutiny from investigators. Treasury Also Targets Senior Iranian Figures The sanctions were not limited to crypto firms. US officials added Iran’s interior minister and a set of other senior figures to the blacklist, citing roles in the violent suppression of protests and in laundering or diverting funds. The listings were announced alongside broader measures that the Treasury said would choke off sources of revenue used to support repressive acts. What Investigators Found Reports note that the exchanges appear to have been used as clearing points for transfers tied to Iranian networks. Blockchain forensics firms and law enforcement agencies say wallets connected to IRGC interests showed links to trades and transfers on these platforms, which helped build the case for sanctions. Some of the accused companies were also tied to known Iranian business figures. Impact On Markets And Firms Markets reacted with caution, though the broader crypto sector did not collapse. Trading on many regulated venues continued, while exchanges that serve global clients began to review ties and tighten compliance checks. A number of service providers are expected to block traffic associated with the newly sanctioned entities to avoid secondary penalties. Observers say this action signals a tougher stance on using crypto to dodge financial rules. Based on reports, regulators may press more cases that treat whole pieces of infrastructure as part of an illicit financing chain. Some analysts warn that the rules will push bad actors to find ever more complex routes, while others expect clearer rules and more cooperation between crypto firms and authorities. Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView










































