hodler

19 Mar 2026, 13:05

Gold Prices Plunge as Fed’s Hawkish Stance Crushes Bullion Sentiment

BitcoinWorld Gold Prices Plunge as Fed’s Hawkish Stance Crushes Bullion Sentiment Gold markets faced significant pressure this week as prices extended their decline for the third consecutive session. The Federal Reserve’s unexpectedly hawkish policy outlook continues to weigh heavily on bullion sentiment, driving investors toward higher-yielding assets. Consequently, spot gold traded near three-week lows in New York and London markets on Thursday, reflecting growing concerns about prolonged monetary tightening. Gold Prices Face Sustained Pressure from Monetary Policy The precious metal’s decline follows the Federal Reserve’s latest policy meeting, where officials signaled a more aggressive approach to inflation control. Market analysts immediately noted the shift in tone, which suggested higher interest rates for a longer duration than previously anticipated. This development fundamentally alters the investment landscape for non-yielding assets like gold. Historically, gold struggles during periods of rising interest rates for several compelling reasons. First, higher rates increase the opportunity cost of holding gold, which generates no interest or dividends. Second, they typically strengthen the U.S. dollar, making gold more expensive for foreign buyers. Third, they reduce the appeal of safe-haven assets as economic confidence improves. Recent trading data reveals the extent of this pressure. Spot gold fell 1.8% on Wednesday alone, marking the sharpest single-day decline in six weeks. Furthermore, trading volumes surged 40% above the 30-day average, indicating substantial institutional repositioning. These movements reflect a broader market reassessment of inflation expectations and monetary policy trajectories. Technical Analysis Reveals Critical Support Levels Chart patterns provide additional context for the current market dynamics. Gold recently broke below the 50-day moving average, a key technical indicator watched by institutional traders. This breakdown suggests further downside potential unless buyers defend the $1,950 per ounce support level. Additionally, the relative strength index (RSI) has entered oversold territory, potentially signaling a near-term technical rebound. Several factors contributed to this technical deterioration. Initially, options market data showed increased put buying at lower strike prices. Subsequently, ETF outflows accelerated as institutional investors reduced exposure. Finally, futures market positioning data revealed speculative longs cutting positions by 15% in the latest reporting period. Federal Reserve Policy Shift Alters Market Calculus The Federal Reserve’s updated projections indicate a fundamental change in approach. Officials now anticipate maintaining restrictive policy well into 2025, with fewer rate cuts than previously forecast. This hawkish pivot reflects persistent concerns about service-sector inflation and robust labor market conditions. Consequently, market expectations have adjusted dramatically in response. Fed Chair Jerome Powell emphasized this shift during his press conference. “We need greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2%,” he stated, adding that recent data “has not given us that confidence.” This communication directly impacted gold markets, as traders priced in a higher probability of additional rate hikes if inflation proves stubborn. The policy implications extend beyond interest rates alone. Quantitative tightening continues at its current pace, reducing liquidity in financial markets. Meanwhile, the Fed’s balance sheet normalization removes another source of support for asset prices. These combined factors create a challenging environment for precious metals, which traditionally benefit from loose monetary conditions. Comparative Analysis of Previous Tightening Cycles Historical context helps explain current market reactions. During the 2015-2018 tightening cycle, gold initially declined 12% in the six months following the first rate hike. However, it subsequently recovered as inflation expectations adjusted. The current cycle differs in several important respects: Pace of tightening: Current rate hikes represent the most aggressive since the 1980s Inflation starting point: Beginning from multi-decade highs rather than moderate levels Global context: Simultaneous tightening by multiple central banks worldwide Market positioning: Higher initial speculative interest in gold as inflation hedge These differences suggest potentially more pronounced volatility ahead. Market participants must consider whether current price action represents a temporary correction or a more fundamental repricing of gold’s value proposition. Broader Market Impacts and Sector Analysis The gold decline has created ripple effects across related markets. Mining stocks underperformed the physical metal, with the GDX gold miners ETF declining 3.2% on Wednesday. This leveraged response reflects concerns about profit margins and production costs in a higher-rate environment. Additionally, silver followed gold lower, though industrial demand provided some relative support. Currency markets amplified the pressure on dollar-denominated commodities. The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) reached a two-month high following the Fed announcement, gaining 0.9% against a basket of major currencies. This strength directly pressured gold prices through the traditional inverse relationship. Meanwhile, Treasury yields rose across the curve, particularly at the short end, further increasing gold’s opportunity cost. Regional variations emerged in physical demand patterns. Asian markets showed increased buying interest at lower price levels, particularly in China and India. Conversely, Western investment flows turned negative as ETF holdings declined. This divergence highlights differing regional perspectives on gold’s role in portfolios and varying sensitivity to dollar strength. Institutional Positioning and Expert Commentary Major financial institutions adjusted their gold forecasts following the Fed meeting. Goldman Sachs maintained its year-end target of $2,000 per ounce but noted “near-term headwinds from monetary policy.” Meanwhile, JPMorgan analysts highlighted gold’s resilience as a portfolio diversifier despite rate pressures. They emphasized that strategic allocation decisions should consider longer-term factors beyond immediate rate expectations. Market experts point to several factors that could support gold despite current headwinds. Geopolitical tensions remain elevated in multiple regions, supporting safe-haven demand. Central bank buying continues at a robust pace, particularly among emerging market institutions diversifying reserves. Furthermore, recession risks persist despite current economic strength, potentially limiting how high rates can ultimately rise. Forward Outlook and Key Monitoring Points Several upcoming developments will determine gold’s trajectory in coming months. The next Consumer Price Index (CPI) report represents the most immediate catalyst, as it will influence Fed policy expectations. Additionally, employment data will provide insights into labor market strength and wage pressures. Finally, geopolitical developments could suddenly increase safe-haven demand regardless of monetary policy. Technical analysts identify several critical levels to watch. Support at $1,950 represents the first major test, followed by the 200-day moving average near $1,920. Resistance now appears at the previous support level of $1,980, which has become a technical ceiling. Breakouts in either direction will likely trigger algorithmic trading responses and momentum flows. Seasonal patterns offer limited comfort for gold bulls in the current environment. Historically, June represents a weak period for gold ahead of summer doldrums. However, the third quarter often brings stronger performance as Asian buying increases ahead of festival seasons. This seasonal dynamic may interact with monetary policy developments to create trading opportunities. Conclusion Gold prices face sustained pressure from the Federal Reserve’s hawkish policy outlook, extending losses as markets adjust to higher-for-longer rate expectations. The precious metal’s decline reflects fundamental headwinds from rising opportunity costs and dollar strength. However, underlying support from geopolitical tensions and central bank buying provides some counterbalance. Market participants should monitor upcoming inflation data and technical levels closely, as these factors will determine whether current weakness represents a buying opportunity or the beginning of a more sustained downtrend. Ultimately, gold’s trajectory will depend on the evolving balance between monetary policy constraints and persistent safe-haven demand. FAQs Q1: Why do gold prices fall when interest rates rise? Gold generates no yield, so higher interest rates increase the opportunity cost of holding it. Investors can earn interest in bonds or savings instead, making gold less attractive. Additionally, rate hikes typically strengthen the dollar, making gold more expensive in other currencies. Q2: What does “hawkish Fed outlook” mean for markets? A hawkish outlook indicates the Federal Reserve prioritizes fighting inflation over supporting growth. This typically means higher interest rates, reduced monetary stimulus, and potentially slower economic expansion. Markets adjust by pricing in these tighter financial conditions. Q3: How long might gold remain under pressure? Gold could face pressure as long as the Fed maintains its tightening bias. Historically, precious metals struggle during active rate-hike cycles but often recover once the Fed pauses or signals a policy shift. The duration depends on inflation persistence and economic data. Q4: Are there any factors that could support gold despite rate hikes? Yes, several factors provide support: geopolitical tensions increase safe-haven demand, central banks continue buying gold for diversification, recession fears limit how high rates can rise, and physical demand remains strong in key markets like India and China. Q5: How are gold mining stocks affected by falling gold prices? Mining stocks typically show leveraged moves relative to gold prices. They often decline more sharply when gold falls due to fixed operating costs and profit margin concerns. However, they can also rebound more strongly during gold price recoveries due to operational leverage. This post Gold Prices Plunge as Fed’s Hawkish Stance Crushes Bullion Sentiment first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

19 Mar 2026, 12:40

Oil Price Shock Triggers Alarming Slowdown in US Consumer Spending – TD Securities Analysis

BitcoinWorld Oil Price Shock Triggers Alarming Slowdown in US Consumer Spending – TD Securities Analysis WASHINGTON, D.C. – March 2025: A significant oil price shock is triggering an alarming slowdown in US consumer spending, according to new analysis from TD Securities that examines the complex relationship between energy markets and economic behavior. This development comes as global oil markets experience sustained volatility, creating ripple effects throughout the American economy and raising concerns about broader inflationary pressures. Oil Price Shock Fundamentals and Market Dynamics Global oil markets entered 2025 with considerable uncertainty, following geopolitical tensions in key production regions and shifting supply-demand balances. Consequently, benchmark prices have surged approximately 40% year-over-year, reaching levels not seen since the early 2020s. This oil price shock represents the most significant energy market disruption in recent years, fundamentally altering consumer behavior patterns across the United States. TD Securities analysts documented these trends through comprehensive market monitoring. They observed that gasoline prices have increased by an average of $1.25 per gallon nationwide since January. Furthermore, diesel prices have risen even more sharply, affecting transportation and logistics costs throughout the supply chain. These developments have created a dual pressure system on household budgets and business operations. Consumer Spending Slowdown: Evidence and Patterns Recent economic indicators reveal a pronounced consumer spending slowdown across multiple sectors. Retail sales data from February 2025 shows a 2.3% month-over-month decline, marking the steepest drop in eighteen months. Additionally, discretionary spending categories have experienced the most significant reductions, with entertainment and dining expenditures falling by 4.1% and 3.7% respectively. The transportation sector demonstrates particularly clear impacts. Automobile sales decreased by 8.2% in February compared to the previous month, while public transportation usage increased by 12%. Meanwhile, e-commerce delivery services report growing customer resistance to shipping fees, indicating broader sensitivity to transportation-related costs. These behavioral shifts suggest consumers are reallocating budgets to accommodate higher energy expenses. TD Securities Analysis Methodology TD Securities employed a multi-faceted research approach to examine these economic developments. Their team analyzed point-of-sale transaction data from over 50,000 retail locations nationwide. They also conducted sentiment surveys across diverse demographic groups and examined credit card spending patterns. This comprehensive methodology provides robust evidence of the spending slowdown’s scope and severity. The firm’s economists compared current data against historical oil price shock periods, including the 2008 crisis and the 2014-2016 downturn. Their analysis reveals that today’s consumer response follows similar patterns but with greater digital transaction visibility. Modern payment systems now provide more immediate spending data than previous decades allowed. Inflationary Pressures and Economic Implications Rising oil prices create inflationary pressures through multiple transmission channels. Direct effects include higher fuel costs for transportation and heating. Indirect effects encompass increased production and distribution expenses for virtually all goods and services. The Federal Reserve monitors these developments closely, as energy-driven inflation can become embedded in broader price expectations. Core inflation measures, which exclude volatile food and energy components, have shown concerning upward momentum in recent months. This suggests that oil price increases are beginning to affect broader economic conditions. Producer Price Index data from February indicates intermediate goods costs rose 0.8% month-over-month, signaling potential future consumer price increases. The following table illustrates key economic indicators affected by the current oil price shock: Indicator February 2025 Month-over-Month Change Year-over-Year Change Retail Sales $685.2B -2.3% +1.2% Gasoline Prices $4.35/gallon +8.7% +42.3% Consumer Confidence 96.4 -5.2 points -12.1 points Core Inflation 3.2% +0.3% +0.8% Sector-Specific Impacts and Regional Variations The consumer spending slowdown manifests differently across economic sectors and geographic regions. Transportation-dependent industries experience the most immediate effects, while service sectors show more gradual impacts. Regional variations reflect differing energy infrastructure, public transportation availability, and economic structures. Key sector impacts include: Automotive Industry: SUV and truck sales declined 12% while hybrid and electric vehicle interest increased 28% Travel and Tourism: Domestic flight bookings decreased 15% with increased regional “staycation” planning Retail Sector: Mall foot traffic dropped 18% while essential goods retailers maintained stable sales Food Services: Fine dining reservations fell 22% while delivery and takeout services increased 9% Geographically, rural areas demonstrate greater spending reductions than urban centers, reflecting transportation dependency differences. Southern states with limited public transportation options show retail sales declines averaging 3.1%, compared to 1.8% in Northeastern metropolitan areas. These regional patterns highlight infrastructure’s role in economic resilience during energy price shocks. Historical Context and Comparative Analysis Current conditions share characteristics with previous oil price shock periods while exhibiting distinct modern features. The 1970s oil crises produced more severe economic contractions but occurred in a manufacturing-dominated economy. The 2008 price spike coincided with broader financial system instability, complicating causal analysis. Today’s situation unfolds within a service-oriented, digitally-connected economy with different vulnerability and adaptation patterns. Notably, today’s consumers have more immediate price information and alternative options than previous generations. Digital platforms enable rapid comparison shopping and service substitution. Remote work arrangements, expanded during the pandemic, provide additional flexibility absent in earlier crises. However, increased dependency on delivery services and digital infrastructure creates new vulnerabilities during energy price disruptions. Policy Responses and Market Interventions Government agencies and financial institutions monitor these developments closely. The Federal Reserve considers energy price effects when formulating monetary policy, though their direct tools for addressing oil market dynamics remain limited. Meanwhile, the Department of Energy evaluates strategic petroleum reserve releases, while legislators debate potential consumer relief measures. Financial markets have responded with increased volatility, particularly in energy-sensitive sectors. Transportation and heavy industry stocks have underperformed broader indices by approximately 15% year-to-date. Conversely, renewable energy and efficiency technology companies have attracted increased investment interest, reflecting shifting market expectations about long-term energy transitions. Conclusion The oil price shock is producing a measurable consumer spending slowdown across the United States, with TD Securities analysis providing crucial insights into these economic dynamics. This situation demonstrates the continuing vulnerability of modern economies to energy market disruptions, despite technological advances and efficiency improvements. The spending patterns emerging from this period will likely influence economic policy and business strategy throughout 2025 and beyond, as stakeholders adapt to evolving energy realities and consumer behavior shifts. FAQs Q1: What defines an “oil price shock” in economic terms? An oil price shock refers to a rapid, significant increase in crude oil prices that disrupts normal economic functioning. Economists typically identify shocks as price increases exceeding 30% within a quarter, sustained over multiple months, and affecting broader economic indicators beyond energy markets. Q2: How quickly do oil price increases affect consumer spending? Research shows gasoline price changes affect consumer spending within 4-6 weeks, as households adjust discretionary purchases to accommodate higher fuel costs. Broader economic impacts through supply chains manifest over 2-3 months, as increased production and transportation costs translate to higher consumer prices. Q3: Which demographic groups are most affected by oil price shocks? Lower-income households, rural residents, and transportation-dependent workers typically experience the greatest impacts, as energy costs represent larger portions of their budgets. However, recent analysis suggests middle-income suburban families now show significant sensitivity due to increased vehicle dependency and reduced public transportation options. Q4: How do oil price shocks differ from general inflation? Oil price shocks represent specific commodity-driven inflation that can trigger broader price increases but originate from supply-side energy market disruptions. General inflation reflects overall price level increases across multiple goods and services, often driven by demand factors or monetary conditions rather than single commodity markets. Q5: What historical precedents exist for the current situation? The 1973-74 and 1979 oil crises, the 1990 price spike following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, and the 2007-2008 commodity price surge provide relevant historical comparisons. Each period combined unique geopolitical factors with underlying supply-demand imbalances, producing distinct economic outcomes based on contemporaneous economic structures and policy responses. This post Oil Price Shock Triggers Alarming Slowdown in US Consumer Spending – TD Securities Analysis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

19 Mar 2026, 12:36

Bitcoin tests old 2021 top as gold falls to six-week lows under $4.7K

Bitcoin price correction reversed at $69,500, preserving a new higher BTC trading range as gold led a post-Fed macro asset sell-off.

19 Mar 2026, 12:30

EUR/USD Forecast: Critical 1.1400 Support Holds After ECB’s Decisive Policy Shift

BitcoinWorld EUR/USD Forecast: Critical 1.1400 Support Holds After ECB’s Decisive Policy Shift FRANKFURT, March 2025 – The EUR/USD currency pair faces a critical technical juncture as the 1.1400 level emerges as decisive support following the European Central Bank’s latest policy announcement. Market participants now closely monitor whether this psychological and technical barrier will withstand mounting pressure from shifting monetary policy dynamics across Atlantic financial markets. EUR/USD Technical Analysis: The 1.1400 Support Confluence Technical analysts identify the 1.1400 level as a significant support zone for several compelling reasons. Firstly, this price point represents the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level from the pair’s 2024 rally. Additionally, the 200-day moving average currently converges near this level, creating a powerful technical confluence. Historical price action further validates this zone’s importance, as it previously served as both resistance in early 2024 and support during the third quarter of the same year. Market structure analysis reveals that a sustained break below 1.1400 would invalidate the current bullish market structure. Consequently, this would potentially open the door for further declines toward the 1.1250 support zone. Conversely, a successful defense of this level could trigger a technical rebound toward the 1.1550 resistance area. The Relative Strength Index currently hovers near oversold territory, suggesting limited downside momentum in the immediate term. ECB Policy Outcome: A Detailed Breakdown The European Central Bank’s March 2025 policy meeting delivered several significant developments that directly impact the euro’s valuation. Most notably, the Governing Council decided to maintain its key interest rates at current levels while announcing a gradual reduction in its balance sheet runoff pace. This decision reflects the ECB’s cautious approach amid persistent inflationary pressures in the services sector. President Christine Lagarde emphasized during the press conference that the central bank remains data-dependent. She specifically highlighted concerns about wage growth and services inflation. The ECB’s updated economic projections revealed a modest downgrade to 2025 growth forecasts while maintaining inflation targets. Market participants interpreted these communications as moderately dovish, contributing to initial euro weakness. Comparative Monetary Policy Analysis The Federal Reserve’s current policy stance creates an important divergence that influences the EUR/USD pair. While the ECB maintains a cautious approach, the Federal Reserve has signaled potential rate cuts in the coming quarters. This policy divergence typically supports the U.S. dollar against the euro. However, recent weaker-than-expected U.S. economic data has tempered expectations for aggressive Fed easing. The interest rate differential between the Eurozone and United States remains a crucial driver for the currency pair. Currently, the spread favors dollar-denominated assets, creating headwinds for euro appreciation. Market-implied probabilities suggest investors expect the ECB to maintain current rates through mid-2025 before considering any policy normalization. Market Impact and Trader Positioning Commitments of Traders reports reveal significant shifts in market positioning following the ECB announcement. Leveraged funds substantially reduced their net long euro positions, reflecting increased caution. Meanwhile, asset managers maintained relatively neutral exposure, suggesting institutional investors await clearer directional signals. The reduction in speculative positioning has contributed to decreased volatility in the currency pair. Options market analysis provides additional insights into market expectations. Risk reversals, which measure the relative demand for calls versus puts, show increased demand for euro put options. This indicates growing concern about potential euro depreciation. However, the overall options skew remains within historical ranges, suggesting no extreme positioning exists currently. Economic Fundamentals Supporting the Euro Despite recent weakness, several fundamental factors continue to support the euro’s medium-term outlook. The Eurozone’s current account remains in substantial surplus, providing structural support for the currency. Additionally, improving economic indicators from Germany, particularly in manufacturing and exports, suggest potential economic stabilization. Energy security improvements across the continent have also reduced external vulnerability. Inflation dynamics present a mixed picture for policymakers. While headline inflation has moderated significantly, core inflation remains stubbornly above target levels. Services inflation, in particular, continues to demonstrate persistence. The ECB’s cautious approach reflects these complex inflationary dynamics and their implications for monetary policy normalization. Historical Context and Technical Precedents Historical analysis reveals that the 1.1400 level has served as a pivotal technical level on multiple occasions. During the 2022-2023 period, this level marked the upper boundary of a multi-year trading range. The successful breach above this level in early 2024 represented a significant technical breakthrough. Now, the retest of this former resistance-turned-support represents a classic technical analysis scenario. Previous ECB policy announcements provide valuable context for current market reactions. Historically, the euro has demonstrated increased volatility during the 24-hour period following major policy decisions. However, sustained directional moves typically require confirmation from subsequent economic data releases. The current market reaction appears consistent with this historical pattern. Global Macroeconomic Factors Influencing EUR/USD Several global macroeconomic developments impact the EUR/USD outlook beyond direct monetary policy considerations. Geopolitical tensions, particularly in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, continue to influence risk sentiment and currency flows. Additionally, global growth differentials between major economic blocs create fundamental headwinds or tailwinds for currency pairs. Commodity price dynamics, especially energy prices, significantly affect the euro due to Europe’s import dependency. Recent stabilization in natural gas prices has provided some relief for the Eurozone’s terms of trade. Meanwhile, China’s economic recovery pace influences European export prospects, creating indirect effects on euro demand. Expert Analysis and Institutional Forecasts Major financial institutions have published updated EUR/USD forecasts following the ECB meeting. Consensus estimates suggest a range-bound outlook for the coming quarters, with most analysts identifying 1.1400 as a critical support level. Investment banks cite the policy divergence theme as the primary driver of their forecasts, while acknowledging potential catalysts for euro strength. Technical analysts emphasize the importance of monitoring price action around the 1.1400 level. A daily close below this support would likely trigger further selling pressure, while a successful defense could encourage short covering. Volume analysis suggests institutional participation remains elevated around this technical level, confirming its significance. Risk Factors and Potential Catalysts Several upcoming events and data releases could influence the EUR/USD trajectory. The Federal Reserve’s next policy meeting represents a particularly important catalyst, as any shift in U.S. monetary policy expectations would impact the interest rate differential. Additionally, Eurozone inflation data for March will provide crucial information about price pressures. Political developments in both Europe and the United States create additional uncertainty. European Parliament elections scheduled for June 2024 could influence policy expectations, while U.S. presidential election dynamics may affect dollar sentiment. These political factors add layers of complexity to the fundamental outlook for the currency pair. Conclusion The EUR/USD forecast centers decisively on the 1.1400 support level following the European Central Bank’s latest policy decisions. Technical analysis confirms this level’s significance as a confluence of multiple important indicators. While the ECB’s cautious approach creates near-term headwinds for the euro, several fundamental factors provide underlying support. Market participants should monitor price action around this critical level closely, as a sustained break could signal further euro weakness. Conversely, successful defense of 1.1400 support may establish a foundation for potential euro recovery. The coming weeks will provide crucial evidence about which scenario will unfold in global currency markets. FAQs Q1: Why is the 1.1400 level so important for EUR/USD? The 1.1400 level represents a technical confluence including the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement, the 200-day moving average, and historical support/resistance. This combination creates a particularly significant technical zone that often determines medium-term direction. Q2: How did the ECB’s latest decision specifically affect the euro? The ECB maintained interest rates while signaling a slower balance sheet reduction pace. Markets interpreted this as moderately dovish, contributing to initial euro weakness. However, the central bank’s data-dependent approach means future decisions will respond to incoming economic information. Q3: What would cause EUR/USD to break below 1.1400 support? A sustained break below 1.1400 would likely require either significantly stronger U.S. economic data, more hawkish Federal Reserve communications, or weaker-than-expected Eurozone inflation and growth indicators. Technical breakdowns typically need fundamental catalysts. Q4: How does the Federal Reserve’s policy compare to the ECB’s approach? The Federal Reserve has signaled potential rate cuts while the ECB maintains a more cautious stance. This policy divergence typically supports the U.S. dollar, though recent weaker U.S. data has tempered expectations for aggressive Fed easing. Q5: What time frame should traders watch for confirmation of direction? Traders typically watch for a daily or weekly close below 1.1400 to confirm a breakdown. Intraday breaches often prove temporary. The coming weeks will provide important evidence as markets digest the ECB decision and upcoming economic data. This post EUR/USD Forecast: Critical 1.1400 Support Holds After ECB’s Decisive Policy Shift first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

19 Mar 2026, 12:00

Zcash Is Crypto’s Most Mispriced Asset, Cypherpunk CIO Says

Cypherpunk Technologies CIO Will McEvoy is making a blunt case for Zcash: the market is undervaluing ZEC because it still has no coherent way to price privacy. In a thread published Tuesday, McEvoy argued that the discount is especially striking as AI-driven surveillance expands and demand for financial confidentiality becomes easier to justify. McEvoy’s core claim is simple. “Zcash is the most mispriced asset in crypto because privacy is the most mispriced asset in society,” he wrote. “The market has no real framework for valuing privacy so it gets ignored. The upside is asymmetric nonetheless.” Why Zcash Could Be ‘Mispriced’ He built that argument around relative size. At the time of his post, McEvoy put ZEC at $263 with a $4.4 billion market capitalization. Against that, he listed Bitcoin at $1.45 trillion, gold at $34.8 trillion, offshore wealth at $11.3 trillion, stablecoins at $312 billion, and Monero at $6.8 billion. The point was less about direct comparability than scale: by McEvoy’s framing, Zcash remains “just a rounding error” in every market it could plausibly intersect. Related Reading: Zcash Is The Last Possible 1000x In Crypto, Venture Capitalist Says That thesis runs through each benchmark. Relative to Bitcoin, McEvoy argued Zcash is still tiny enough that even a modest re-rating would imply a large move. He wrote that if ZEC reached 0.5% of Bitcoin’s value, it would imply a price of $446, or about 1.7 times higher. At 1%, the implied price rises to $891; at 2%, $1,782; and at 5%, $4,456. His summary line was as compressed as the valuation case itself: “Zcash is encrypted Bitcoin.” The offshore wealth comparison is more pointed. McEvoy described privacy not as a niche preference, but as something people have historically paid for at scale. “There is $11.3 trillion in offshore wealth,” he wrote. “People pay a premium for privacy. They always have. They always will.” From there, he argued that if Zcash captured 0.1% of that market, the implied price would be $680. At 0.5%, it would be $3,402, and at 1%, $6,804. “Zcash is a Swiss bank account in your pocket,” he added. His gold comparison extends the same logic into a more traditional store-of-value frame. “Gold is private. You can hold it. No one knows how much you have,” McEvoy wrote. “Zcash has the same properties but it’s digital, portable, and programmable.” On that basis, he modeled ZEC at $1,048 if it reached 0.05% of gold’s value, $2,095 at 0.1%, and $10,477 at 0.5%. Related Reading: Zcash Surges Post-SEC Probe: Is a Fresh Yearly High on the Horizon? McEvoy also positioned Zcash as a response to the visibility built into much of crypto’s existing payment infrastructure. “Stablecoin transactions are tracked. Wallets are surveilled,” he wrote, before laying out price scenarios based on ZEC reaching 5%, 10%, or 25% of the stablecoin market. Those levels implied prices of $939, $1,877, and $4,692, respectively. He also compared Zcash to Monero. McEvoy argued Zcash offers “stronger cryptography, optional transparency for compliance, and better scalability,” then laid out a simple relative-value table: parity with Monero would imply $410 for ZEC, double Monero’s value would imply $819, and five times Monero’s value would imply $2,047. “The privacy coin throne is not yet claimed,” he wrote. His closing point tied the whole thesis to a broader technological shift. “Artificial intelligence is the attack. Zcash is the defense,” McEvoy said. “AI decodes all the data. Zcash encrypts all the data. AI is the surveillance state. Zcash is the sovereign individual. As AI advances, privacy becomes more valuable, not less.” At press time, ZEC traded at $244.77. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

19 Mar 2026, 11:53

Gold Is Toast: Chart Breakdown Could Signal Next Big Move In Copper, Oil And Uranium

I have been calling gold up for a couple of years now, and readers would have caught gold below $2,000 if they had been following my rants. But the trend just broke.