Invest ideasNews
6 May 2026, 16:10
What to Expect From Stable’s v1.3.0 Mainnet Upgrade
p]:pt-0 [&>p]:mb-2 [&>p]:my-0"> Stable’s v1.3.0 is an upgrade focused on execution safety, EVM consistency, and stronger RPC reliability. p]:pt-0 [&>p]:mb-2 [&>p]:my-0"> EIP-7702 support is being hardened with stricter authorization and rollback checks. p]:pt-0 [&>p]:mb-2 [&>p]:my-0"> Several edge-case fixes target gas accounting, failed ERC20 behavior, COINBASE handling, and blocked precompile ranges. As the global stablecoin market pushes toward a record-breaking $316 billion capitalization , the underlying infrastructure is undergoing a massive “safety-first” recalibration. This morning, the development team behind Stable announced the upcoming v1.3.0 Mainnet protocol upgrade, set for activation on May 13, 2026. This mandatory, non-backward compatible release is designed to transform the network into a production-grade highway for institutional stablecoin transactions, focusing on execution security and network-wide consistency. Scheduled for approximately 07:00 UTC at block height 24,077,500, the v1.3.0 upgrade marks a critical technical pivot. Following the recent regulatory shifts in the CLARITY Act , which moved stablecoins closer to the traditional financial “plumbing,” the Stable protocol is tightening its internal validation logic to prevent the edge-case vulnerabilities that often haunt high-volume blockchains. Hardening the Execution Layer: EIP-7702 and Beyond The centerpiece of the Stable Mainnet v1.3.0 upgrade is a significant hardening of the network’s execution safety. Developers have introduced enhanced system transaction handling that validates not just the sender, but also the destination and method selector. This granular approach effectively closes execution gaps that could theoretically be exploited in complex smart contract interactions. Perhaps most importantly for the 2026 landscape, Stable is doubling down on its support for EIP-7702, a proposal that allows externally owned accounts (EOAs) to temporarily adopt smart contract features . The v1.3.0 release introduces stricter checks on structure and authorization handling for these formats. By aligning EIP-7702 authorization rollback with the official specification, Stable ensures that as users transition toward “Smart Accounts,” their security remains anchored in a predictable, verifiable framework. EVM Refinements and Protocol-Level Protections Beyond transaction safety, the upgrade addresses several lingering edge cases within the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) execution environment. Notable fixes include corrected gas accounting for failed stateful precompile calls and improvements to refund behavior following internal failure of ERC20 calls—a critical fix for stablecoin transfers that require absolute precision. The update also aligns the COINBASE opcode behavior with the latest industry standards, ensuring that rewards and block-level data remain consistent across the network. To further insulate the network from unintended execution paths, Stable is introducing a new range of blocked addresses, specifically covering the Prague precompile address range. Unknown precompile methods will now require query gas, a move that reduces the risk of low-level contract interactions being used to drain network resources or bypass traditional safety checks. This “defensive programming” approach is aimed directly at the institutional partners who require the same level of predictability from a blockchain that they expect from a legacy wire system. Elevating RPC Reliability for Production Infrastructure For indexers, explorers, and backend application developers, the RPC layer is where the “real world” meets the blockchain. Stable v1.3.0 brings a much-needed wave of reliability improvements to this layer. The upgrade ensures that non-public namespaces are no longer exposed by default, and signing APIs are strictly limited to secure configurations. Address formatting will now enforce EIP-55 standards, adding a layer of checksum protection that helps prevent costly human errors during manual address entry. The team has also resolved several system transaction response issues—notably fixing the “from = 0x0” error—and improved error logging for fee history. These changes are designed to provide a more stable foundation for the developers building the next generation of on-chain settlement products that global payment firms like Worldpay and Mastercard are now deploying on-chain. Action Plan for Node Operators and Partners Because v1.3.0 is a non-backward compatible upgrade, node operators must act before the May 13 deadline. Nodes running older versions after activation at block 24,077,500 will essentially be cut off from the network, losing the ability to process transactions or sync new blocks. Self-hosted infrastructure partners are advised to stage the new binary in advance, especially if utilizing tools like Cosmovisor for automated transitions. For those managing nodes manually, the team recommends a scheduled restart at the upgrade height to avoid any disruption in deposit or withdrawal flows. Importantly, the upgrade does not involve a chain reset or state migration; all existing chain data will be preserved, ensuring a seamless experience for end-users and holders of the $STABLE token. The Era of Mature Stablecoin Infrastructure The v1.3.0 upgrade is more than just a routine patch; it is a statement of intent. As Stable continues to scale for real-world usage, the move toward stricter validation and EVM consistency highlights the protocol’s maturity. By hardening the network against edge-case risks today, Stable is positioning itself as the preferred destination for the trillions of dollars in global liquidity that are expected to move on-chain over the next five years. For node operators and partners, the message is simple: upgrade now or risk being left behind as the network enters its most secure and consistent phase to date. The future of decentralized finance is built on execution safety, and on May 13, Stable is setting the new gold standard.
6 May 2026, 11:15
Manta Network Shuts Down Staking Program to Protect Token Value
BitcoinWorld Manta Network Shuts Down Staking Program to Protect Token Value Manta Network, the modular blockchain protocol for zero-knowledge (ZK) applications, has officially ended its staking program for the MANTA token. The decision, announced in late April, took effect on April 20, with all staking rewards based on new token issuance permanently halted. Why Manta Network Ended Staking According to the project team, the primary reason for ending the staking program was to prevent long-term dilution of value for existing MANTA holders. Issuing new tokens as staking rewards, the team explained, was gradually reducing the relative value of each token in circulation. By discontinuing this practice, Manta aims to protect the purchasing power and scarcity of MANTA over time. Additionally, the project stated that the move allows the network to better focus its resources and strategic direction. Rather than allocating a portion of new token supply to staking incentives, Manta can now redirect those resources toward ecosystem development, protocol upgrades, and user acquisition. Timeline and Implementation The staking rewards were officially halted on April 20. Users who had staked MANTA tokens prior to this date ceased receiving new token rewards immediately. The staked tokens themselves remain accessible, and users can unstake them according to the network’s standard unbonding period. Manta Network has not announced any alternative reward mechanism or replacement program at this time. Impact on MANTA Holders and the Ecosystem For current MANTA holders, the end of staking rewards removes a source of passive income. However, the project argues that the trade-off is a more sustainable tokenomics model. Without continuous new token issuance, the total supply of MANTA will grow more slowly, potentially supporting price stability and reducing sell pressure from reward recipients. The decision also aligns with a broader trend in the cryptocurrency industry, where several projects have revisited staking reward structures to address inflation concerns. Networks like Ethereum have transitioned to a deflationary model post-Merge, while others have reduced or eliminated staking rewards to better align incentives. Market Reaction and Community Response Following the announcement, the MANTA token experienced moderate price fluctuations, though the market has largely absorbed the news without major volatility. Community reactions have been mixed, with some users expressing disappointment over the loss of staking yields, while others support the long-term value preservation strategy. Manta Network has emphasized that the decision was made after careful analysis of tokenomics and community feedback. The team has not ruled out introducing alternative staking or incentive mechanisms in the future, but no specific plans have been disclosed. Conclusion Manta Network’s decision to end its staking program represents a strategic shift toward token value preservation and resource optimization. While it removes a passive income stream for stakers, the move aims to strengthen the long-term economic foundation of the MANTA token. The project now faces the challenge of maintaining user engagement and network security without the traditional staking incentive structure. FAQs Q1: Why did Manta Network end its staking program? A1: Manta Network ended its staking program to prevent dilution of MANTA token value caused by continuous new token issuance as staking rewards. The project also cited a desire to refocus network resources and strategy. Q2: When did the staking rewards stop? A2: Staking rewards were officially halted on April 20. Users who had staked MANTA tokens stopped receiving new token rewards from that date onward. Q3: Can users still unstake their MANTA tokens? A3: Yes, users can still unstake their MANTA tokens according to the network’s standard unbonding period. The staked tokens themselves remain accessible, and no funds are locked beyond normal unstaking procedures. This post Manta Network Shuts Down Staking Program to Protect Token Value first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
6 May 2026, 11:00
Major Step for Cardano: Hard Fork Submitted to Preview Ahead of Mainnet
Cardano (ADA) upgrade gains momentum as first milestone locks in.
6 May 2026, 06:30
Zano Prepares Trustless Cross-Chain Bridge for Native ZANO After Hard Fork 6
Zano is set to open native ZANO to EVM networks, TON, and Solana through a non-custodial bridging mechanism tied to its upcoming Hard Fork 6, slated for Q2 2026. Key Takeaways: Zano’s Hard Fork 6, targeted for Q2 2026, introduces Gateway Addresses enabling trustless bridging of native ZANO to EVM, TON, and Solana networks. The
5 May 2026, 12:51
Cardano Just Added Institutional-Grade Compliance Tools: Is This News the Missing Piece for ADA Adoption?
Cardano completed an integration with Scorechain’s blockchain analytics platform , deploying institutional-grade compliance tools, risk scoring, and transaction monitoring built specifically around Cardano’s UTXO model. This is bullish news for cardano. For regulated entities that have been hesitant to touch ADA, this removes a genuine friction point. The move is bullish by most reads, addressing compliance hurdles that have historically slowed institutional adoption. Cardano is now integrated into @Scorechain across its full compliance and investigation framework. Risk scoring, entity attribution, and transaction monitoring for $ada and Cardano native tokens, built for Cardano's UTXO model. Multi-chain teams can now monitor, investigate,… pic.twitter.com/S2Hhvx0mLe — Cardano Foundation (@Cardano_CF) May 4, 2026 Meanwhile, the Van Rossem hard fork (Protocol Version 11) and the Leios upgrade targeting 1,000+ TPS by end-2026 remain the ecosystem’s headline catalysts. With Bitcoin holding above $80,000 and total market cap above $2.43 trillion, the macro backdrop isn’t the problem here. Can Cardano Price Break $0.28 This Week? ADA is stuck in a tight range between $0.24–$0.25, and right now, it is just noise inside that band. $0.26 is the first trigger. Reclaim that with volume, and ADA has a shot at breaking the descending trendline near $0.28, which then opens the move toward $0.30. Source: ADAUSD / Tradingview On the downside, $0.23 is the line to hold. Lose that, and the structure turns bearish fast, with room toward $0.22 and lower. The derivatives picture leans cautious. Rising shorts with declining open interest suggest traders are not positioning for a breakout yet. Most likely, for now, it keeps trading between $0.23 and $0.27 until a real catalyst emerges. So the rule here is simple: bullish above $0.26, bearish below $0.23, everything in between is just chop. LiquidChain Could Replace Cardano This Bull Cycle ADA grinding sideways is the trade-off of scale. The fundamentals can look fine, but without a catalyst, the price can sit for weeks, and even the upside targets stay relatively modest. That is why some traders start looking earlier in the cycle, where price discovery has not happened yet, and the upside is not capped by market cap. LiquidChain is aiming at that space, focusing on cross-chain liquidity by connecting Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana into a single execution layer. The goal is to remove fragmentation so developers and users can interact across ecosystems without rebuilding or bridging complexity. The presale is around $0.01456 with just over $718K raised, which puts it in an early stage where interest is building, but the asset is not fully priced. But it is still unproven. Execution, adoption, and liquidity after launch are all unknowns, which is the trade-off with early-stage infrastructure. So the contrast is clear, ADA offers a more established but slower-moving setup, while something like LiquidChain offers earlier positioning with higher potential, but also higher risk. VISIT LiquidChain HERE The post Cardano Just Added Institutional-Grade Compliance Tools: Is This News the Missing Piece for ADA Adoption? appeared first on Cryptonews .
4 May 2026, 11:30
New Bitcoin Quantum Proposal Gives Satoshi A Silent Ownership Path
Paradigm researcher Dan Robinson has proposed a new mechanism that could let long-dormant Bitcoin holders, including Satoshi Nakamoto, preserve a future claim to their coins if Bitcoin ever has to restrict spending from quantum-vulnerable addresses. The proposal, called Provable Address-Control Timestamps, or PACTs, is designed to let holders prove they controlled an address before cryptographically relevant quantum computers emerged, without moving their BTC today. The idea addresses one of the most sensitive questions in Bitcoin’s post-quantum debate: what happens to early coins sitting in addresses with exposed public keys. In a May 1 research post titled “PACTs: Protecting Your Bitcoin From a Quantum Sunset,” Robinson warned that “an attacker with a powerful enough quantum computer could steal hundreds of billions of dollars of Bitcoin.” He argued that the community may one day choose to “sunset” the ability to spend from addresses whose public keys have already been revealed onchain. PACTs Offer Satoshi A Quiet Bitcoin Rescue Option That path would be controversial. Bitcoin’s culture strongly protects the right of holders to remain inactive for years, even decades. But Robinson frames the issue as a dilemma with no clean default if cryptographically relevant quantum computers, or CRQCs, become unavoidable. “If an upgrade sunsets support for those addresses, these dormant holders will be forced to publicly move their coins or let them be frozen. But if quantum computers are coming and we don’t sunset those addresses, those holders will be forced to move those coins or let them be stolen. Either path seems to force long-time holders to give up some of their privacy by publicly moving their funds.” The problem is especially acute for Satoshi-era Bitcoin. Robinson notes that wallets believed to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto hold around 1.1 million BTC, worth more than $75 billion based on the figures used in the post. Many of those coins predate modern deterministic wallet standards such as BIP-32, making them harder to rescue through some of the zero-knowledge proof paths already discussed in relation to BIP-361 . BIP-361, in draft form, has proposed a soft fork that would eventually sunset spending from addresses with exposed public keys. Rescue paths have also been discussed for certain wallet types, particularly where a holder can prove knowledge of a parent key that a quantum attacker would not have. Robinson’s point is that this does not solve the earliest address problem. PACTs attempt to create that missing escape hatch. The proposal would let holders make a private, off-chain commitment today showing that they controlled a vulnerable UTXO before any quantum attacker could derive the relevant private key. They would do so by generating a secret salt, producing a BIP-322 full message signing proof for the vulnerable scriptPubKey, hashing that proof into a commitment, and timestamping the commitment through OpenTimestamps. The holder would not broadcast a Bitcoin transaction. They would store the salt, the BIP-322 proof, and the OpenTimestamps proof file as a recovery artifact. The timestamp itself would reveal nothing about the address, public key, control proof, salt, or coins involved. “This does not require Bitcoin to decide today whether a sunset is necessary,” Robinson wrote. “It only gives holders a silent, no-onchain-cost way to preserve evidence that may become useful if such a sunset is ever adopted.” If a future Bitcoin fork did freeze or sunset ECDSA spending from exposed public keys, a holder could later provide a post-quantum-secure proof, such as a STARK, showing that the timestamped commitment existed before a cutoff date and that it corresponds to a valid control proof for the frozen UTXO. Crucially, the salt and control proof would remain hidden, and the rescue proof would be tied to a specific transaction to prevent replay or redirection. Robinson is careful to present PACTs as an illustrative design rather than a formal Bitcoin proposal. The commitment phase relies on existing primitives, but the rescue phase would require “substantial new plumbing” inside Bitcoin’s protocol. There is also no guarantee that Bitcoin would ever adopt such a rescue path, or even choose to sunset quantum-unsafe keys at all. Still, the proposal is notable because it separates two decisions that are often bundled together: whether Bitcoin should ever impose a quantum sunset, and whether holders can begin preserving evidence of legitimate ownership before that debate is resolved. For early holders, that distinction matters. PACTs would not eliminate the quantum problem, but they could give dormant wallets a way to prepare without revealing themselves first. “Bitcoin is about preparing for the long term, hedging for tail risks, and self-reliance,” Robinson concluded. “If there is a way to plant a seed now that will give us an advantage over cryptographic attackers in a possible future, then long-term holders should take it.” At press time, BTC traded at $79,690.
