Invest ideasNews
4 Apr 2026, 10:35
Ethereum Foundation eyes up to $5.4M annual revenue as 70K ETH staking goal nears
On Friday, the Ethereum Foundation staked 45,034 ETH, worth about $93 million, by depositing 2,047 ETH into the Eth2 Beacon Chain for each transaction. With those transactions, the foundation is much closer to its 70,000 goal; overall, it has now staked about 69,500 ETH, just under 500 ETH short of the goal. Meanwhile, the price of Ethereum has remained relatively stable during the transition, trading around $2,050 to $2,060 in recent sessions. Since June last year, the EF has shifted its attention to staking to ensure it has a steady stream of cash for long-term protocol upgrades. Last year’s policy update confirmed that the Foundation will be leaning more into staking and DeFi to support blockchain infrastructure. The EF could earn up to $5.4 million a year in staking yields The Ethereum Foundation started the year by staking 2,016 ETH, worth roughly $4.1 million, in February, followed up with 22,517 ETH, worth $46.1 million, in March. Its latest deposits, of more than 45,000 ETH, are the largest so far in 2026. The EF’s staked holdings are now worth approximately $143 million, and at current APYs of 2.7%–3.8%, they could yield $3.9-$5.4 million a year. Dr. Lena Schmidt, a blockchain economist at the Digital Asset Research Institute, believes the increased staking is indicative of the foundation’s trust in the network’s sustainability. She commented, “It communicates a belief that the network’s staking yield and long-term appreciation outweigh other uses of capital, like funding grants or covering operational expenses.” In the past, the Daily Gwei host, Anthony Sassano, had even encouraged the EF to stake its ETH and sell the staking rewards rather than exchanging ETH for stablecoins to better fund development. However, earlier this year, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin warned that increased EF staking could give them an outsized, potentially problematic vote in a hard fork. He stated, “If EF stakes, ourselves, this de facto forces us to take a position on any future contentious hard fork.” Nonetheless, he insisted that the foundation is looking for ways to offset any centralization in the event of a hard fork. BlackRock launched ETHB, its staked Ethereum trust Meanwhile, in March, BlackRock launched its iShares Staked Ethereum Trust, ETHB, a structure that passes nearly all staking profits back to the people buying the fund. Investors now receive 82% of the staking rewards through monthly payments, comparable to dividends, and the remaining 18% goes to the trust, custodians, and staking providers. The firm detailed that at least 70% of the trust’s ETH will be staked to ensure investors get a steady return. BlackRock’s U.S. equity chief Jay Jacobs said he sees some investors reallocating from ETHA to ETHB. He said, “The majority of Ethereum investors are interested in staking, so we believe that there will be some shift to ETHB.” He further noted that ETHB could appeal to Ethereum investors who were not previously interested in ETH-based products. According to CoinMarketCap, Ethereum is currently trading at $2,053. However, Ethereum is hitting a wall at $2,163, struggling to break past a double-top resistance that has already pushed prices back twice. Traders are watching the MACD for a breakout signal, but if Ethereum can’t clear $2,163 soon, the current pattern suggests a potential slide back to the $1,980 range. Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank .
3 Apr 2026, 14:22
What Is Glamsterdam? Ethereum’s 2026 Upgrade to On-Chain Block Building Explained
Ethereum’s last two major upgrades were focused squarely on Layer 2s. Glamsterdam, targeted to ship in H1 2026, is about improving Layer 1 — not just in terms of speed and efficiency but also the entire block production process. With execution increasingly migrating to L2s and Ethereum itself taking shape as the ecosystem’s underlying settlement and coordination layer, the question of who controls block production and under what rules is more important now than ever. Ethereum’s latest upgrade, Glamsterdam , is targeted to go live in H1 2026, the third hard fork in a year. The two previous upgrades — Pectra and Fusaka , which deployed in May and December 2025 respectively — were primarily oriented toward Layer 2 scaling. Glamsterdam uniquely targets the base layer itself, addressing how blocks are built, who builds them and how the network orders and processes transactions. At first glance, Glamsterdam could be mistaken for a straightforward performance upgrade, centred mainly on higher throughput, larger gas limits and lower fees. At a deeper level, however, it gets right to the heart of how Ethereum wants its base layer to function: not simply as a place for settling transactions, but as a predictable and coherent system whose most important market functions — today handled off-chain — are increasingly integrated within the protocol. Developers call this “enshrinement,” and for institutions evaluating Ethereum as settlement infrastructure, it arguably represents the most significant set of changes since The Merge . The Off-Chain Market Behind Ethereum’s Block Production Ethereum’s block production today looks quite different from the protocol’s original design. After The Merge in 2022, Ethereum moved to proof-of-stake , with validators assigned the right to propose blocks while the task of building them, selecting and ordering transactions, became a separate, specialised activity. Since then, proposer-builder separation (PBS) has come to account for the vast majority of Ethereum’s block production , with validators using third-party relay infrastructure to source blocks from specialised builders. Builders compete to assemble the most profitable blocks, with relays acting as intermediaries that pass block contents to validators without advance disclosure. Over time, that builder market has become highly concentrated, with studies estimating the top three builders control more than 80% of all PBS blocks . The result is a transaction ordering process that has itself become profitable, driven by maximal extractable value (MEV). A growing ecosystem of bots and specialised builders now compete for that value, often through arbitrage, liquidations and other ordering-based opportunities, turning block production into an off-chain market with its own economic logic and trade-offs. Glamsterdam’s Two Core Changes Glamsterdam’s two key proposals replace market functions that evolved informally outside Ethereum’s protocol with more explicit, rule-bound equivalents on-chain. The first, Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (EIP-7732) , moves the builder market into the protocol itself. Currently, validators trust relays not to manipulate or reveal block contents, a trust assumption sitting entirely outside protocol rules. Under ePBS, builders cryptographically seal their blocks and commit to a bid. Validators select the highest bid without seeing transaction contents, and the block is only revealed after the commitment is locked in. The result is a block-building market subject to the same consensus rules as the rest of the network, auditable and rule-bound rather than operating on the goodwill of intermediaries. Block-Level Access Lists (EIP-7928) address execution throughput. Ethereum currently processes transactions sequentially because it cannot predict in advance which storage slots each will touch. BALs make that information explicit at the block level, allowing transactions that do not interfere with one another to be processed in parallel. Former Ethereum Foundation co-executive director Tomasz Stańczak has indicated the resulting gas limit increase will be phased, reaching 100 million per block initially and 200 million once ePBS is fully operational, putting Ethereum on a path toward a throughput of 10,000 transactions per second (TPS) — many times faster than current levels. Glamsterdam also bundles a package of gas repricing EIPs projected to lead to a roughly 78% reduction in fees. What Glamsterdam Doesn’t Solve ePBS makes MEV more transparent and moves it on-chain, a real improvement which doesn’t, however, remove the underlying incentive. Under the current relay-based system, block construction depends heavily on off-chain coordination and trust. ePBS largely eliminates that but it does not remove the economic incentive to extract value from transaction ordering — it simply shifts where and how builders compete for it. A January 2026 academic paper modelling ePBS in the presence of MEV shows exactly how that shift plays out: while it reduces validator-side concentration, it “significantly amplifies profit and content centralisation” among builders, because access to private order flow still confers a structural bidding edge that compounds over time. The sophistication required to build blocks under ePBS with BALs may itself become a centralisation vector, favouring large-scale builders with low-latency infrastructure. Another concern is the free option problem. A builder can withhold their block payload after committing to a bid if late-arriving MEV makes abandoning it more profitable. Academic modelling estimates this affects roughly 0.82% of blocks on average , rising to around 6% during volatile periods. The changes also carry implementation risk. ePBS and BALs together represent a substantial increase in consensus-layer complexity, moving more block-building and execution logic into the protocol itself. That may make the system more legible, but it also creates a broader surface for bugs, edge cases and consensus failures, especially given that neither feature has yet been proven at mainnet scale. Vitalik Buterin’s post-Glamsterdam roadmap , which includes FOCIL (confirmed as the headliner for the Hegota upgrade later in 2026) and encrypted mempools as subsequent steps, is the clearest sign that ePBS is a foundation, not an end in itself. Why Institutions Are Watching For institutions, Glamsterdam’s significance is less about the fee reduction and more about what auditable block production means in practice. By mid-2025, over 50% of high-value Ethereum transactions were being routed through private channels specifically to avoid MEV extraction, a workaround that suggests the current system does not always offer the level of predictability some participants require. Protocol-enforced block ordering gives compliance and risk teams a legible, rule-bound system they can model and audit. Combined with Ethereum’s twice-annual upgrade cadence and Hegota already planned for late 2026, it signals an infrastructure trajectory institutions can plan around. The wider significance is structural. If L2s in the future handle most execution while L1 serves as the settlement base, then the quality of L1 block production matters more, not less. The concern is not retail throughput on rollups but whether the coordination layer beneath them is predictable enough to anchor compliant, auditable activity at scale. Glamsterdam does not displace Layer 2 networks. Even at 200 million gas per block, L2s remain cheaper for cost-sensitive activity and offer sub-second finality that L1 cannot match. The more likely outcome is a cleaner division of labour, with L2s handling execution and L1 serving as the settlement anchor. Glamsterdam will not resolve every remaining tension in Ethereum’s architecture. The competitive dynamics created by MEV-driven block production migrate more than they disappear, and the added complexity carries genuine implementation risk. But market functions that developed informally outside the protocol are being integrated, made legible, and placed under the same rules as everything else. For an infrastructure layer that institutions are looking towards to anchor compliant financial activity, that is a significant step forward. The post What Is Glamsterdam? Ethereum’s 2026 Upgrade to On-Chain Block Building Explained appeared first on Bitfinex blog .
3 Apr 2026, 00:35
Crypto Gainers and Losers: Stunning 96% Surge and 50% Plunge Define Volatile Market Session
BitcoinWorld Crypto Gainers and Losers: Stunning 96% Surge and 50% Plunge Define Volatile Market Session Global cryptocurrency markets exhibited extreme volatility on Thursday, with several digital assets recording dramatic price swings that highlight the sector’s inherent risk and opportunity. This analysis of the top 5 crypto gainers and losers provides a factual snapshot of a turbulent 24-hour trading session, where one token nearly doubled in value while another lost half its market capitalization. Market data reveals significant trading volume accompanying these moves, suggesting both speculative interest and potential fundamental shifts. Top 5 Crypto Gainers Lead Market Rally The leaderboard for cryptocurrency gainers presented a diverse set of assets, each posting substantial double-digit percentage increases. Notably, the gains were not confined to low-volume, micro-cap tokens but included projects with significant investor activity. The top performer, NTRN, skyrocketed by an astonishing 96.23% to reach a price of $0.0035. This surge occurred alongside a 24-hour trading volume of $6.11 million, indicating concentrated buying pressure. Following closely, CTSI secured the second position with a formidable 69.07% gain, elevating its price to $0.038. Crucially, CTSI’s rally was backed by a substantial $149.17 million in trading volume, demonstrating broad market participation. The remaining gainers—SOLV, NOM, and FITFI—all posted gains between 33% and 41%, with SOLV and NOM each facilitating over $300 million in trades. This volume correlation suggests that institutional or large-scale traders actively contributed to these upward movements. Analyzing the Surge Behind the Gainers Market analysts often scrutinize such rallies for catalysts. Potential drivers include protocol upgrades, major exchange listings, positive development updates, or broader sector rotations. For instance, a surge in a decentralized finance (DeFi) token might coincide with a spike in total value locked (TVL) across its ecosystem. Similarly, a layer-2 scaling solution might gain following a successful network upgrade that reduces transaction fees. Without attributing causation, the synchronized high volume across multiple gainers points to a market-wide search for alpha beyond the largest cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Top 5 Crypto Losers Signal Market Corrections Conversely, the list of cryptocurrency losers painted a stark picture of rapid depreciation. The most significant decline belonged to STO, which plunged 49.74% to $0.2254. Remarkably, this drop transpired amidst a colossal $1.39 billion in trading volume, the highest on today’s list. Such volume during a price collapse typically indicates massive sell-offs, potential liquidations, or profit-taking after a prior rally. SXP experienced a 44.44% decrease to $0.0015, while D fell 38.83% to $0.0083. DRIFT and DUCK rounded out the losers, declining 31.02% and 29.80%, respectively. The trading volumes for these assets varied widely, from a modest $54.73K for D to $74.03M for DRIFT. This disparity highlights how liquidity profiles differ across the crypto landscape, influencing price stability during sell-offs. Contextualizing Sharp Declines in Crypto Markets Sharp downturns in cryptocurrency prices can stem from multiple factors. Common triggers include broader market sentiment shifts, negative regulatory news, security exploits on associated platforms, or the unlocking of large token vesting schedules that increase sell pressure. A token’s decline on high volume, as seen with STO, often carries more technical significance than a drop on low volume, as it reflects a stronger consensus among market participants about its current valuation. The Role of Trading Volume in Price Discovery Trading volume serves as a critical metric for validating price movements in cryptocurrency markets. A price change accompanied by high volume is generally considered more significant and sustainable than one with low volume. For example, CTSI’s 69% gain on $149M volume carries more weight than a similar percentage move on a fraction of that volume. Volume confirms the level of interest and capital flow behind a trend. Market microstructure theory suggests that high volume reduces slippage and improves price efficiency. In the context of today’s data, the billion-dollar volume for STO during its drop indicates a highly liquid, albeit one-sided, market event. Analysts monitor the volume profile over time to distinguish between healthy corrections and concerning capitulation events. Cryptocurrency Market Volatility and Investor Strategy The simultaneous presence of tokens gaining over 90% and losing nearly 50% within the same 24-hour window underscores the extreme volatility endemic to the cryptocurrency asset class. This environment presents both high risk and high potential reward. Experienced traders implement rigorous risk management protocols, including position sizing and stop-loss orders, to navigate these swings. Long-term investors, meanwhile, often look beyond daily volatility to assess fundamental project metrics like developer activity, community growth, and real-world adoption. They may view sharp downturns as potential accumulation opportunities for fundamentally sound projects, while treating parabolic rallies with caution. The diversity of today’s gainers and losers—spanning different sectors and market caps—reinforces the non-correlated nature of many crypto assets. Conclusion Today’s analysis of the top 5 crypto gainers and losers reveals a market characterized by powerful opposing forces. Extraordinary gains for tokens like NTRN and CTSI contrast sharply with severe corrections for assets like STO and SXP. The substantial trading volumes accompanying these moves confirm active price discovery and significant capital reallocation. For market participants, these daily fluctuations highlight the importance of due diligence, volatility management, and a clear investment thesis. Monitoring these gainers and losers provides a real-time pulse on sector rotation, sentiment shifts, and emerging narratives within the expansive digital asset ecosystem. FAQs Q1: What does a high trading volume indicate during a price surge? A high trading volume during a price increase generally validates the move, suggesting strong buyer conviction and broad market participation. It can indicate that the new price level has support and may be more sustainable. Q2: Why might a cryptocurrency suddenly drop 40-50% in a single day? Sudden large drops can result from several factors, including negative news (regulatory, security), large sell orders from whales or institutions, technical breakdowns of key support levels, or profit-taking after a prior unsustainable rally. Q3: Are the biggest daily gainers usually good long-term investments? Not necessarily. Extreme short-term gains are often driven by speculation, hype, or technical squeezes and may not reflect long-term fundamental value. Investors should conduct independent research rather than chase performance. Q4: How should traders interpret data on crypto gainers and losers? Traders use this data to identify market momentum, sector rotation, and volatility patterns. It can signal where capital is flowing (into gainers) and fleeing (from losers), aiding in tactical decisions, but it is just one piece of a broader analytical puzzle. Q5: What is the difference between a market correction and a capitulation event? A correction is a moderate decline (often 10-20%) within a longer-term uptrend, considered healthy. Capitulation is a severe, high-volume sell-off where investors surrender hope, often marking a potential market bottom before a reversal. This post Crypto Gainers and Losers: Stunning 96% Surge and 50% Plunge Define Volatile Market Session first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
2 Apr 2026, 21:02
New Document: Hedera (HBAR) Is Quantum Resistant
Crypto researcher SMQKE has published a post on X asserting that Hedera can be classified as “quantum resistant,” emphasizing that documented technical specifications support the claim. The post is presented as a direct reference to Hedera’s publicly available materials, focusing on the network’s cryptographic design and its ability to adapt to evolving security standards. Hedera = “Quantum Resistant” Documented. https://t.co/8AbYpDb9Yc pic.twitter.com/Pi5sBZDWs3 — SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) March 31, 2026 Hedera’s Architecture and Consensus Model The material shared alongside the post outlines Hedera’s use of a directed acyclic graph structure rather than a traditional blockchain. This design allows transactions to be processed in parallel rather than sequentially, which distinguishes it from conventional distributed ledger systems. The documentation further explains that the network relies on a hashgraph consensus mechanism built on a gossip protocol that distributes information efficiently across nodes. According to the referenced text, the system is supported by asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance, a security model that enables consensus even when some nodes behave maliciously. This framework is presented as a key component of Hedera’s resilience and reliability in adversarial conditions, reinforcing the network’s broader security posture. Cryptographic Standards and Quantum Considerations The post places particular emphasis on the cryptographic standards implemented within the network. The attached material specifies the use of CNSA-aligned standards in Transport Layer Security connections between nodes, and in cryptographic operations executed on-chain. It highlights the inclusion of 384-bit SHA-2 hashing in HMAC constructions, described in the document as “quantum resistant” under current CNSA 2.0 guidance. Additional cryptographic components referenced include 256-bit AES keys for symmetric encryption and RSA with 2048-bit keys. The documentation also notes support for modern signature algorithms such as Ed25519 and ECDSA using the secp256k1 curve. These elements are presented collectively to demonstrate the breadth of Hedera’s cryptographic framework. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Design Flexibility and Future Adaptation SMQKE’s post also highlighted a key aspect of Hedera’s design: its capacity to integrate new cryptographic standards without requiring disruptive network upgrades. The referenced material states that Hedera was built to accommodate evolving demands and technological changes, including those associated with quantum computing. The document explains that while many distributed ledger systems may require fundamental structural changes to adopt post-quantum cryptography, Hedera can introduce new algorithms without initiating a hard fork. It cites the network’s prior addition of ECDSA support after launch as evidence of this capability and indicates that similar upgrades could be implemented to address future quantum-related risks. By presenting these documented specifications, SMQKE positions Hedera’s “quantum-resistant” label as a claim grounded in existing technical disclosures rather than speculation. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post New Document: Hedera (HBAR) Is Quantum Resistant appeared first on Times Tabloid .
1 Apr 2026, 18:53
Bitcoin Transaction Fees Hit Lowest Level Since 2017: But It’s Not Due to Weak Demand
The average transaction fee on the Bitcoin network has fallen below $0.40 for the first time since 2017, according to on-chain data shared by analyst Darkfost. The drop is markedly different from other times in the past when low costs were triggered by low usage, as it has come while daily transaction counts are still relatively high. What Is Driving Down Fees According to Darkfost, the decline is largely due to the introduction of inscriptions, a technical adjustment that helps limit the weight of transactions in each block. In doing so, the adjustment appears to have reduced competition for block space, which has led to lower fees even though activity hasn’t dropped yet. “Even though this was implemented through a soft fork, it still represents a significant development for Bitcoin,” Darkfost said of the change.” The analyst also noted that, on average, the Bitcoin network’s processed transactions have remained relatively stable, which they described as “far from low.” They also pointed out that historically, the highest fees on Bitcoin have often appeared during price peaks, while the lowest came near bear market phases, similar to what is being experienced currently. At the time of writing, BTC was trading close to $69,000. This is down more than 17% from the past year and about 45% from its all-time high of over $126,000 in October 2025. The 30-day performance is a little better; CoinGecko data shows that BTC gained almost 4% in that time, while it lost 7% in the last week. The elevated volatility has been due in part to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, which saw BTC drop to the $65,000 level on Monday, recover past $68,000 on Tuesday, and fall again to $66,000, before climbing back toward $69,000 after reports emerged that U.S. President Donald Trump planned to deliver a major update on the conflict. This Is Where Bitcoin Goes Next Analysts have suggested that the price behavior described above matches patterns seen during consolidation periods, when value moved within set ranges, and traders tried to figure out which way to go. On Monday, Coinglass reported that momentum was largely tentative, with the short-term structure still being defined by lower highs. At the same time, observers at CryptoQuant noted that Bitcoin had dipped back into an accumulation zone, with large holders becoming more active on Binance, depositing large batches of the cryptocurrency. From all the data, the market appears to be neither in an uptrend nor in a downtrend but rather trading in a wide band, identified by Daan Crypto Trades as lying between $60,000 and $80,000, with the lower transaction costs coinciding with a period of price consolidation and cautious positioning. The post Bitcoin Transaction Fees Hit Lowest Level Since 2017: But It’s Not Due to Weak Demand appeared first on CryptoPotato .
1 Apr 2026, 11:02
Uniswap Foundation reveals asset structure and fundraising details for end of 2025
Uniswap Foundation reported $85.8 million in assets at the end of 2025. $106.2 million was allocated for existing and new grant projects. Protocol upgrades and ecosystem changes supported developer participation and innovation. Continue Reading: Uniswap Foundation reveals asset structure and fundraising details for end of 2025 The post Uniswap Foundation reveals asset structure and fundraising details for end of 2025 appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
