hodler

22 Jan 2026, 07:10

Upbit NEO Suspension: Essential Guide to the Critical N3 Hard Fork and Trading Halt

BitcoinWorld Upbit NEO Suspension: Essential Guide to the Critical N3 Hard Fork and Trading Halt In a significant move for the Asian cryptocurrency market, leading South Korean exchange Upbit announced on February 1, 2025, that it will temporarily suspend all deposit and withdrawal services for NEO and its companion token, GAS. This proactive suspension, effective from 3:00 a.m. UTC on February 2, directly responds to a scheduled and critical hard fork on the NEO N3 network. Consequently, this decision will immediately impact traders and holders on one of the region’s most prominent trading platforms. Understanding the Upbit NEO Suspension Announcement Upbit, operated by Dunamu Inc., issued an official notice to its user base detailing the upcoming service halt. The exchange will suspend transactions for both NEO and GAS tokens to ensure network stability and user asset security during the NEO N3 migration. This is a standard operational procedure for reputable exchanges during major blockchain upgrades. Furthermore, the suspension affects only deposit and withdrawal functions; spot trading for the two assets may continue normally on the platform until further notice. The exchange has committed to providing updates regarding the resumption of services once the network upgrade concludes successfully. The Technical Rationale Behind the Precaution Exchanges like Upbit implement these temporary suspensions to prevent potential loss of funds or transaction errors. During a hard fork, the blockchain splits, creating two separate chains. If deposits or withdrawals were processed at the exact moment of the fork, transactions could be sent to an incorrect or incompatible chain. Therefore, by halting external transfers, Upbit safeguards user assets from these technical risks. This practice demonstrates the exchange’s operational expertise and commitment to risk management, aligning with the highest standards of trustworthiness in the digital asset industry. Deep Dive: The NEO N3 Hard Fork and Network Upgrade The core reason for Upbit’s action is the NEO N3 hard fork, representing the most substantial upgrade in the NEO blockchain’s history. Often dubbed “Neo3,” this iteration is not merely an incremental update but a complete overhaul of the network’s architecture. The N3 upgrade aims to enhance performance, governance, and functionality to solidify NEO’s position as a developer-friendly platform for decentralized applications (dApps) and digital assets. Key enhancements introduced by the NEO N3 hard fork include: NeoFS: A decentralized storage system integrated directly into the blockchain. NeoID: A decentralized identity framework enabling compliant digital asset management. Enhanced Governance: A revamped model using NEO tokens for voting on network parameters and GAS fees. Improved Economics: A refined distribution mechanism for GAS, the fuel token used for network transactions and smart contracts. The following table outlines the primary differences between the legacy NEO blockchain and the new N3 version: Feature Legacy NEO NEO N3 Consensus Mechanism dBFT (Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance) dBFT 2.0 (Enhanced) Governance Token NEO NEO (with enhanced voting power) Utility Token GAS GAS (redesigned distribution) Core Focus Digital Assets & Smart Economy Full-Stack Decentralized Ecosystem Historical Context of Blockchain Upgrades and Exchange Response This event follows a well-established pattern in the cryptocurrency sector. Major exchanges routinely pause services during significant network events. For instance, leading global exchanges enacted similar measures during Ethereum’s transition from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake (The Merge) and Bitcoin’s various Taproot and SegWit upgrades. These suspensions are universally recognized as a sign of an exchange’s technical diligence rather than a cause for alarm. They provide the development team with a stable environment to execute the upgrade and allow the exchange to thoroughly test compatibility before reopening services. Immediate Impact on Traders and the NEO Ecosystem The immediate effect of Upbit’s announcement is a temporary liquidity gate for NEO and GAS moving on and off the exchange. Users cannot deposit new tokens from external wallets or withdraw holdings to private custody during the suspension window. However, the impact extends beyond simple transaction halts. Market analysts often observe slight volatility in an asset’s price preceding a known suspension, as traders adjust their positions. For the broader NEO ecosystem, the hard fork is a pivotal moment. A successful upgrade could attract new developers and projects to the platform, potentially increasing the long-term utility and value of both NEO and GAS tokens. Conversely, any technical difficulties during the migration could temporarily affect market sentiment. Upbit’s cautious approach directly mitigates these risks for its users. Expert Perspective on Exchange Risk Management Industry experts consistently affirm that proactive suspensions are a hallmark of responsible exchange operations. “When a foundational layer-1 blockchain like NEO undergoes a hard fork, the potential for chain confusion and replay attacks is real,” explains a blockchain infrastructure analyst from a Seoul-based fintech research firm. “Exchanges like Upbit have a fiduciary duty to protect client assets. By instituting a clean, communicated pause around the fork event, they eliminate the single biggest technical risk to user funds during this transition. This is standard, professional practice.” This expert insight underscores the procedural nature of the announcement and its alignment with robust security protocols. Timeline and What Users Should Do Next The suspension is scheduled to begin precisely at 3:00 a.m. UTC on February 2, 2025. There is no publicly announced end time, as the resumption of services depends on the successful completion and stabilization of the NEO N3 network. Typically, such suspensions last between a few hours to several days. Upbit has advised users to complete any necessary deposits or withdrawals before the deadline. Recommended steps for Upbit users holding NEO or GAS: Plan Ahead: Complete any urgent withdrawals to self-custody wallets well before the 3:00 a.m. UTC deadline on February 2. Monitor Official Channels: Follow Upbit’s official announcement page and social media for the service resumption notice. Verify Wallet Compatibility: Ensure your personal NEO wallet supports the new N3 network before withdrawing after services resume. Exercise Patience: Anticipate potential network congestion and slower processing times immediately after the upgrade as the ecosystem stabilizes. Users should only trust information from Upbit’s official website and verified social media accounts to avoid phishing scams that often emerge around such events. Conclusion The temporary Upbit NEO suspension for both NEO and GAS tokens is a direct, precautionary response to the landmark NEO N3 hard fork. This action highlights the exchange’s commitment to security and operational excellence while the underlying blockchain undergoes its most significant upgrade. For the NEO project, the N3 hard fork represents a strategic leap toward a more powerful and scalable decentralized ecosystem. Investors and users should view this temporary service halt not as a disruption, but as a necessary step in the maturation and advancement of blockchain infrastructure, ensuring a secure transition for all network participants. FAQs Q1: Can I still trade NEO and GAS on Upbit during the suspension? Spot trading for NEO and GAS may continue normally on Upbit’s internal order book. The suspension applies only to depositing tokens from an external wallet or withdrawing tokens from Upbit to an external wallet. Q2: How long will the Upbit NEO suspension last? Upbit has not announced a specific end time. The duration depends on the successful completion and post-upgrade stability of the NEO N3 network. Similar historical suspensions for other blockchains have typically lasted from several hours to a few days. Q3: Will my NEO and GAS tokens on Upbit automatically upgrade to the N3 version? Yes. As a custodial service, Upbit will handle the technical migration of all user-held NEO and GAS tokens to the new N3 blockchain. Users do not need to take any action for tokens already held on the exchange. Q4: What is the difference between NEO and GAS tokens? NEO is the governance token of the blockchain, used for voting on network proposals. GAS is the utility token, used to pay for transaction fees and deploy smart contracts on the NEO network. The N3 upgrade refines the economic relationship between the two. Q5: Is my NEO in a private wallet affected by the Upbit suspension? No. The suspension only affects movement of tokens to and from the Upbit exchange. The NEO N3 hard fork itself will affect all tokens on the network. Holders in private wallets must ensure their wallet software is compatible with the new N3 network to access and move their funds after the fork. This post Upbit NEO Suspension: Essential Guide to the Critical N3 Hard Fork and Trading Halt first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

21 Jan 2026, 10:00

Upbit Announces Crucial Suspension for Stellar Network Upgrade, Impacting XLM, AQUA, and MOBI

BitcoinWorld Upbit Announces Crucial Suspension for Stellar Network Upgrade, Impacting XLM, AQUA, and MOBI In a significant operational move, South Korea’s leading cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit, has announced a temporary suspension of services for key Stellar-based assets, including Stellar Lumens (XLM), due to a pivotal network upgrade scheduled for January 22, 2025. This proactive measure highlights the evolving infrastructure demands within the blockchain ecosystem and underscores the meticulous planning required by major exchanges to ensure user asset security during core protocol transitions. Consequently, traders and holders must prepare for a brief interruption in deposit and withdrawal functionalities. Upbit’s Strategic Pause for the Stellar Network Upgrade Upbit formally notified its user base about the impending service halt, which will commence precisely at 8:00 a.m. UTC on January 22. The suspension specifically targets deposit and withdrawal services for Stellar Lumens (XLM), the native cryptocurrency of the Stellar network. Additionally, the exchange will pause withdrawal services for two other Stellar-based tokens: Aqua (AQUA), a decentralized exchange and liquidity provider, and Mobius (MOBI), which focuses on blockchain-based loyalty programs. Importantly, trading for these assets will remain unaffected during this period, allowing market activity to continue seamlessly. This decision is not an isolated incident but rather a standard, security-first protocol. Major exchanges globally routinely enact similar temporary halts during scheduled network upgrades or hard forks. For instance, platforms like Binance and Coinbase have historically paused services for assets like Ethereum and Cardano during their respective major upgrades. Upbit’s action follows this established industry best practice, prioritizing the safety of user funds above all else. Network upgrades can sometimes create temporary chain splits or require wallet software updates, and pausing movements prevents potential loss or errors. The Technical Imperative Behind the Suspension The Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) periodically implements protocol upgrades to enhance network performance, security, and functionality. These upgrades are consensus-driven and require all network validators, including those operated by exchanges, to update their software. Upbit, as a responsible validator and custodian, must synchronize its systems with the new protocol. The suspension window allows their engineering team to safely install, test, and validate the new Stellar core software across their infrastructure. This process ensures that once services resume, all transactions are processed on the correct, upgraded chain without any risk of replay attacks or other technical complications. Detailed Timeline and Immediate User Impact Users must mark their calendars for the specific timeline to avoid any inconvenience. The suspension for deposits and withdrawals of XLM, and withdrawals for AQUA and MOBI, begins at the stated time. Upbit has not announced a specific end time, noting that services will resume “after the upgrade is complete.” Typically, such maintenance windows last between 2 to 6 hours, but the exchange advises users to monitor official announcements for the all-clear. During this window, users cannot move these assets onto or off of the Upbit platform. However, all other exchange functions, including trading, spot wallets for other assets, and customer support, will operate normally. For active traders, the key takeaway is that while asset movement is frozen, market positions can still be managed. You can buy or sell XLM, AQUA, and MOBI against Korean Won (KRW) or other trading pairs on Upbit during the suspension. This continuity is crucial for maintaining market liquidity and allowing users to react to price movements. Nevertheless, users planning to deposit XLM for a trade or withdraw it to an external wallet for participation in Stellar-based DeFi protocols must complete those actions before 8:00 a.m. UTC on January 22. Affected Assets: Stellar Lumens (XLM), Aqua (AQUA), Mobius (MOBI). Affected Services: XLM deposits/withdrawals; AQUA & MOBI withdrawals. Unaffected Services: Trading for all three assets. Key Time: 8:00 a.m. UTC, January 22, 2025. Broader Context: Stellar’s Evolution and Exchange Readiness The Stellar network, co-founded by Jed McCaleb, has consistently focused on facilitating cross-border payments and financial inclusion. Its upgrades often target improvements in transaction speed, fee efficiency, and smart contract capabilities through its Stellar Smart Contracts (SSC) platform. This particular upgrade is part of Stellar’s ongoing roadmap to enhance scalability and interoperability with other financial systems. Exchanges play a critical role as gateways, and their compliance with these upgrades is essential for network health and user access. Upbit’s announcement reflects its position as a top-tier, compliant exchange in a stringent regulatory environment like South Korea. The exchange’s communication is clear, timely, and detailed, which builds trust (E-E-A-T) with its users. This approach contrasts with less transparent platforms and demonstrates operational maturity. Furthermore, by handling this process smoothly, Upbit reinforces the reliability of the Stellar ecosystem itself, showing that major infrastructure players can coordinate effectively for necessary technical advancements. Historical Precedents and Market Stability Historically, well-communicated exchange suspensions for network upgrades have had minimal long-term impact on asset prices. Short-term volatility can occur due to reduced liquidity from paused withdrawals, but markets typically normalize quickly post-upgrade. The transparency of the process prevents panic. For example, past Ethereum upgrades like “London” or “The Merge” saw similar exchange pauses without causing market disruption. The focus remains on the long-term benefits of the network upgrade, such as improved functionality or lower costs, which can positively influence an asset’s fundamental value over time. Conclusion Upbit’s temporary suspension of services for XLM, AQUA, and MOBI is a necessary and standard operational procedure driven by the upcoming Stellar network upgrade. This move prioritizes the absolute security of user assets and ensures a smooth transition to the upgraded protocol. Users should plan their asset movements accordingly before January 22 and can continue trading as usual. This event underscores the collaborative nature of blockchain development, where exchanges, foundations, and users work in concert to enable secure technological progress. The successful execution of this upgrade will contribute to the continued robustness and capability of the Stellar network in the 2025 cryptocurrency landscape. FAQs Q1: Can I still trade XLM on Upbit during the suspension? A1: Yes, trading for XLM, AQUA, and MOBI will remain fully operational. Only deposit and withdrawal services are affected. Q2: How long will the suspension last? A2: Upbit has not specified an exact end time. Services will resume after the Stellar network upgrade is complete and validated, which typically takes a few hours. Users should check official Upbit announcements for the confirmation. Q3: Why is only the withdrawal service suspended for AQUA and MOBI, but both deposit and withdrawal for XLM? A3: This is likely due to technical and accounting procedures. XLM, as the native asset, requires full wallet updates. For non-native tokens (AQUA, MOBI), the exchange may manage risk by pausing withdrawals while assessing the upgrade’s stability before re-enabling all functions. Q4: Will my XLM, AQUA, or MOBI holdings on Upbit be safe during this time? A4: Absolutely. The suspension is a preventative security measure. Your assets held in your Upbit wallet are not at risk. The process is designed specifically to protect them during the technical transition. Q5: Do other exchanges also suspend Stellar services for this upgrade? A5: It is highly probable. Most major global exchanges that support XLM will announce similar temporary suspensions to perform their own node updates. Always check the announcements from your specific exchange for their schedule. This post Upbit Announces Crucial Suspension for Stellar Network Upgrade, Impacting XLM, AQUA, and MOBI first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

21 Jan 2026, 04:12

Polygon price prediction as adoption, transactions, and fees soar

Polygon price has retreated and pared back some of the gains experienced earlier this year. The POL token was trading at $0.1345 on Wednesday morning, down from the year-to-date high of $0.1865. Its fundamentals suggest that the POL price will eventually rebound as the network growth accelerates. Polygon’s adoption rate has soared Polygon, one of the biggest players in the layer-2 industry, has done well this year as the impact of the Madhugiri hard fork continued. The network has struck major deals, leading to a surge in the number of transactions, active addresses, and fees. In a statement on Tuesday, Polygon noted that Toku had selected its network to provide its payment infrastructure. Toku, a payroll company that has raised millions of dollars, will use Polygon to launch a global stablecoin payment feature on the network. Polygon | POL @0xPolygon · Follow NEW: Toku selects Polygon to launch compliant, global stablecoin payroll for employers.Same systems, same compliance standards, but entirely new onchain rails for recurring payments.With this integration, every Toku user across 100+ countries receives a Polygon wallet by Watch on Twitter View replies 5:00 PM · Jan 20, 2026 360 Reply Copy link Read 50 replies This is an important development as it means that each Toku user will receive a Polygon wallet by default. It will also likely draw more companies in the payroll industry to use Polygon to handle transactions. More companies have embraced Polygon’s technology, with the most notable ones being fintech companies like Stripe, Revolut, Shift4 Payments, and Mastercard Additionally, Polygon powers Polymarket, one of the biggest players in the fast-growing prediction industry. This integration means that Polygon handles transactions worth over $2 billion a month. This growth has led to a surge in transactions and fees in the network, a situation that will accelerate after the recent Coinme and Sequence acquisitions. Data compiled by Nansen shows that the number of transactions in Polygon jumped by 5% in the last 30 days to over 175 million, while the number of active addresses remained at oc 11 million. Polygon transactions have jumped | Source: Nansen Most importantly, Polygon is generating huge sums of money in fees. Its network fees jumped by 400% in the last 30 days to over 3 million. The soaring fees are important for the POL price because of the token burn. Recent data shows that the POL burn rate has jumped to a record high this year, with millions of tokens being removed from circulation. There are signs that POL is highly undervalued, a situation that happened because of the elevated competition from other layer-2 networks like Base, Optimism, and Arbitrum. For one, unlike most tokens, Polygon does not have any token unlocks and it has a token burn mechanism that removes millions of coins from circulation a month. This is unlike a token like Sui that has large token unlocks, weaker metrics, and a higher valuation than Polygon. Polygon price technical analysis POL price chart | Source: TradingView The daily timeframe chart shows that the POL price has retreated from the year-to-date high of $0.1840 to the current $0.1343. It has moved below the important support level at $0.1500, its lowest level in April last year. The token has remained below the 50-day and 100-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMA), while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has continued moving downwards. Therefore, the most likely scenario is where the token rebounds in the coming weeks, potentially to the year-to-date high of $0.1840, which is about 37% above the current level. The post Polygon price prediction as adoption, transactions, and fees soar appeared first on Invezz

20 Jan 2026, 21:55

Bitcoin’s Decentralization: A Looming Liability in the Quantum Computing Era, Analyst Warns

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin’s Decentralization: A Looming Liability in the Quantum Computing Era, Analyst Warns NEW YORK, April 2025 – A prominent crypto market analyst has issued a stark warning, shifting the conversation around one of Bitcoin’s core strengths into a potential future weakness. Jamie Coutts of Real Vision now argues that Bitcoin’s celebrated decentralization could become its greatest liability in the face of advancing quantum computing technology, a threat he once dismissed as distant science fiction. This perspective challenges a common narrative in the crypto community and highlights a fundamental asymmetry in how different financial systems are preparing for a technological paradigm shift. Bitcoin Quantum Computing Threat: A Shift in Perspective For years, the discussion around quantum computing and cryptocurrency has often been met with skepticism. Many proponents argued that the threat was overblown or that solutions would emerge in time. However, Jamie Coutts’s recent public reassessment on social media platform X signals a growing urgency. He notes a critical divergence in preparedness. While large, centralized financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and major central banks are investing billions in quantum research and quantum-resistant cryptography, Bitcoin’s upgrade path is inherently more complex. Consequently, this creates a potential vulnerability gap. Traditional finance, with its centralized governance, can theoretically mandate and deploy new security protocols more swiftly. In contrast, Bitcoin requires broad consensus across a global, decentralized network of miners, nodes, and developers. This process, while robust against censorship and single points of failure, is not designed for rapid, emergency response. The Decentralization Dilemma and Upgrade Mechanics Bitcoin’s lack of a central authority is its foundational innovation. There is no CEO, no risk committee, and no board of directors to approve changes. Upgrades occur through a community-driven process involving Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), which require widespread adoption to activate. Historic upgrades like SegWit or the Taproot activation took years of debate and technical development. Consensus-Driven Changes: Any quantum-resistant algorithm would need near-universal agreement from a diverse set of stakeholders. Implementation Timeline: Even after consensus, rolling out a fundamental cryptographic change across the entire network is a massive logistical undertaking. Coordination Challenge: Unlike a bank, there is no single entity to coordinate a global security patch. Therefore, the primary risk Coutts identifies is not that quantum computing will instantly break Bitcoin’s cryptography tomorrow, but that the decentralized system may struggle to organize an adequate response during the early, uncertain stages of the threat’s materialization. Expert Analysis and the Broader Financial Landscape Coutts’s analysis gains context when examining parallel developments. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been running a multi-year process to standardize post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Major tech firms and governments are actively testing these new algorithms. A 2024 report from the World Economic Forum highlighted quantum computing as a top-five global risk to financial stability. Institutional investors are taking note. BlackRock and Fidelity, both major spot Bitcoin ETF issuers, include technological obsolescence, including quantum advances, as a standard risk factor in their filings. This institutional scrutiny underscores that the quantum question is moving from theoretical forums to practical risk management desks. Timeline Uncertainty and Proactive Research The core uncertainty lies in the timeline. Experts are divided on when a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer (CRQC)—one powerful enough to break Bitcoin’s Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)—might exist. Estimates range from a decade to several decades. However, the “harvest now, decrypt later” threat is real. Adversaries could be collecting encrypted data today to decrypt it later once quantum computers are available. Simultaneously, research into quantum-resistant blockchains and Layer-2 solutions is active. Projects like the Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL) have launched, and Ethereum researchers are exploring integration of PQC. The table below summarizes the contrasting postures: System Governance Model Quantum Preparedness Posture Key Challenge Traditional Finance (Banks) Centralized, Hierarchical Active R&D, Top-Down Mandates Possible Legacy System Integration, Cost Bitcoin Network Decentralized, Consensus-Based Community-Led Research, Slow Upgrade Path Achieving Timely, Universal Consensus Newer Cryptocurrencies Varies (Often Foundation-Led) Can Design with PQC from Inception Network Effects, Adoption Ultimately, the debate is less about *if* Bitcoin can adapt—most experts believe it can—and more about *how quickly and smoothly* it can adapt compared to centralized rivals under a sudden technological shock. Conclusion Jamie Coutts’s revised warning on the Bitcoin quantum computing threat reframes a core tenet of the digital asset. Decentralization, the very feature that provides resilience against political and institutional interference, may introduce friction when confronting an existential technological threat. The coming years will test the Bitcoin community’s ability to conduct proactive, coordinated research and prepare for a soft-fork upgrade of unprecedented importance. The race is not just against quantum computing’s development timeline, but also against the agile response capabilities of the traditional financial system it aims to disrupt. The outcome will hinge on the network’s capacity for foresight and collective action long before a crisis arrives. FAQs Q1: What exactly would a quantum computer break in Bitcoin? A1: A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could break the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) used to create Bitcoin addresses and sign transactions. This could allow someone to derive private keys from public keys, potentially stealing funds from exposed addresses. Q2: Is this threat unique to Bitcoin? A2: No, quantum computing threatens all current public-key cryptography, which secures most of the internet and modern finance. However, the argument is that centralized entities like banks may be able to upgrade their systems faster than a decentralized network like Bitcoin. Q3: Are there any solutions being worked on? A3: Yes. Cryptographers globally are developing post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms. NIST is standardizing them, and blockchain developers are researching how to integrate these into existing networks like Bitcoin through future upgrades. Q4: Should Bitcoin investors be worried right now? A4: Most experts agree the threat is not imminent, likely a decade or more away. The concern is about long-term preparedness. The current risk is considered low, but it is a recognized topic in long-term risk assessments. Q5: Can Bitcoin be forked to become quantum-resistant? A5: Technically, yes. The Bitcoin protocol can be updated via a soft fork to implement quantum-resistant signatures. The significant challenge is achieving the necessary consensus among users, miners, and businesses to smoothly execute such a fundamental change across the entire ecosystem. This post Bitcoin’s Decentralization: A Looming Liability in the Quantum Computing Era, Analyst Warns first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

20 Jan 2026, 15:51

Self-Custody is No Longer a Retail Hobby. It is Becoming Institutional Infrastructure

How control, delegation, and professional operations are reshaping Proof-of-Stake participation By Artemiy Parshakov, VP of Institutions at P2P.org How the Institutional View of Self-Custody Is Changing For years, institutional participants largely equated self-custody with retail risk. Managing private keys, interacting directly with protocols, and relying on personal hardware were viewed as practices better suited to individual users than regulated organizations with fiduciary responsibilities. That perception is evolving. Secure hardware, non-custodial delegation mechanisms, and professional validator operations are converging into participation models that preserve institutional control while supporting performance, reliability, and scale. Self-custody is increasingly evaluated not as a fringe preference, but as a serious architectural option within institutional crypto frameworks. This shift reflects a broader change in how institutions engage with digital assets. Early participation often emphasized access and exposure through familiar custodial setups. Today, attention is expanding toward how participation is structured, governed, and sustained over time. Crypto is increasingly treated as infrastructure rather than experimentation, bringing questions of control, accountability, and role separation to the forefront. Infrastructure Advances Enable New Participation Models This evolution is supported by meaningful progress at the tooling layer. Institutional custody solutions now offer multi-party authorization, policy-based controls, auditability, and integration with compliance and reporting workflows. In practice, cryptographic control is often distributed across multiple authorized parties, with transaction execution subject to quorum requirements, predefined risk policies, and clear separation between asset ownership and operational signing. Actions are attributable and reviewable, allowing onchain activity to align with internal governance, audit, and oversight frameworks. These capabilities allow organizations to retain direct control of assets while operating within established governance frameworks. At the same time, Proof-of-Stake networks have refined delegation mechanisms that enable participation without transferring ownership. Institutions can authorize staking activity through clearly defined arrangements that preserve custody while supporting network security and governance. Together, these developments enable a layered participation model. Asset control remains with the institution or its custodian. Operational execution is handled by specialized infrastructure teams focused on validator performance and reliability. Oversight and accountability remain transparent and well defined. This structure mirrors how institutions already interact with financial infrastructure in traditional markets. Why Staking Naturally Favors Functional Separation Staking introduces operational requirements that reward specialization. Validator performance depends on uptime, configuration, responsiveness to protocol upgrades, and disciplined execution over time. Outcomes reflect how infrastructure is operated in practice. As institutional participation expands, many organizations are adopting models where validator operations are delegated to dedicated infrastructure providers. This allows internal teams to focus on governance, allocation, and oversight, while operational specialists manage the technical execution required for consistent participation. The result is a clear division of responsibilities. Each function operates within its area of expertise, supported by measurable performance standards and defined accountability. This approach aligns with long-standing institutional practices, where execution is delegated and control remains clearly assigned. Staking is increasingly adopting the same logic. Self-Custody as an Institutional Design Choice Within this framework, self-custody supports architectural clarity. Institutions can define how control is exercised, how operational responsibilities are segmented, and how delegation is structured without introducing unnecessary complexity. For corporate treasuries, this strengthens governance and reporting alignment. For asset managers, it reinforces transparency and fiduciary discipline. For fintech platforms, it provides a scalable foundation with well-defined operational boundaries. Custody combined with professional delegation creates a balanced model. Control remains explicit. Execution is specialized. Oversight is continuous. This approach reflects how institutions build durable systems across other parts of the financial stack. Infrastructure Awareness Joins the Yield Conversation As staking ecosystems expand, institutional discussions are broadening. Yield remains relevant, and it is increasingly evaluated alongside reliability, accountability, and integration with existing systems. Self-custody fits naturally into this perspective. It provides a framework for direct asset control while enabling participation through specialized operational expertise. When supported by robust infrastructure, this model scales predictably and integrates cleanly with institutional processes. There are also network-level implications. When large participants retain custody and delegate operations, governance influence is distributed across a wider set of stakeholders rather than concentrated within a small number of custodial operators. Non-custodial delegation allows capital to be operationally diversified without fragmenting ownership. Institutions can support multiple validators, geographies, and infrastructure stacks while maintaining unified custody and oversight. This reduces single points of operational failure, limits validator concentration, and improves network resilience during periods of stress or rapid change. Validator diversity is supported without requiring every participant to operate infrastructure independently. Networks benefit from professional execution while maintaining decentralization characteristics. These dynamics are shaping how Proof-of-Stake ecosystems evolve as institutional participation grows. Where Institutions Go From Here Institutional attention is increasingly centered on how staking participation is structured and operated across the infrastructure stack. For many organizations, staking is emerging as an operating model decision, shaped by how custody, governance, and execution come together in practice. This is the moment for structured evaluation. Treasury leaders, asset managers, and risk teams are examining how non-custodial staking models function in real conditions, how validator performance is maintained, how operational risks are managed, and how these systems integrate with existing custody, reporting, and oversight frameworks. Early engagement supports familiarity, internal alignment, and informed decision-making. Institutions that invest time in evaluating robust, proven non-custodial staking infrastructure are positioning themselves to participate with confidence as staking continues to scale. Self-custody is becoming a durable component of institutional crypto architecture. Its role is defined by how effectively it supports control, delegation, and operational discipline at scale. About the Author As Vice President of Institutions at P2P.org, Artemiy drives strategic partnerships, institutional growth, and product development for the world’s leading non-custodial staking providers. With over $12 billion in staked assets under management, P2P.org is at the forefront of blockchain infrastructure, empowering institutions to maximize the potential of staking and decentralized finance. As a regular speaker at industry-leading events, including DevCon, ETHDenver, Staking Summit, Paris Blockchain Week, Artemiy brings insights into staking, DeFi, preconfirmations, and emerging trends that benefit both institutions and the broader blockchain ecosystem.

20 Jan 2026, 14:00

TenX Protocol integrates XTZ through Tezos Foundation deal

TenX Protocol will add XTZ in a partnership with the Tezos Foundation. The protocol offers staking solutions, tapping the potential passive income of XTZ. TenX Protocol has acquired XTZ as part of a strategic partnership with the Tezos Foundation. TenX itself will hold the tokens as part of its ongoing validator operations for the Tezos network. As of January 19, TenX added 5,542,935.08 XTZ tokens at an average cost of $0.58, in a mix of open-market and OTC operations. TenX funded the XTZ reserves with cash on hand from an earlier raise completed in August 2025. TenX chose Tezos to boost its validator operations, where the company focuses on becoming a part of the infrastructure for fast networks with long-term potential and stability. “As we scale our validator operations, Tezos stands out for its governance model, technical maturity, and reliability,” said Mat Cybula, CEO of TenX. The Tezos Foundation will add a portion of additional XTZ reserves to the validators operated by TenX after the deal’s completion. The inclusion of XTZ reserves will further align TenX with the long-term health of the Tezos ecosystem. Tezos network builds toward stability The Tezos network has seen no downtime over nearly a decade of operations. For now, Tezos lags behind other L1s in terms of app deployment. The network still works on its infrastructure, reaching upgrades through on-chain governance rather than hard forks. “TenX sees what others have missed: Tezos combines battle-tested governance with the scaling and performance the industry has been chasing. Validators who think long-term are a natural fit,” said Arthur Breitman, co-founder of Tezos. Tezos has hosted several small DEXs, although the chain only carries $35M in value locked. The current objective of Tezos is to increase revenues, potentially benefiting validators. An active on-chain economy can offer yields and invite more staking. The regular network rewards for Tezos holders are also relatively small, based on the chain’s native tokenomics. TenX signals confidence in Tezos The inclusion of TenX signals long-term confidence that Tezos can produce recurring revenues. TenX has focused mostly on staking protocols with robust regular returns. The company operates institutional-grade staking infrastructure, seeking cash flow from its portfolio of crypto assets. TenX also offers infrastructure, consulting, and development services for other networks. The partnership signals a potential reawakening for Tezos as DeFi and onchain activity remain elevated in 2026. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .