hodler

25 May 2026, 05:55

Indian Rupee Extends Gains as RBI Governor Malhotra Signals Willingness to Intervene Further

BitcoinWorld Indian Rupee Extends Gains as RBI Governor Malhotra Signals Willingness to Intervene Further The Indian rupee continued its upward trajectory against the US dollar on Tuesday, extending gains as Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra explicitly opened the door for further market intervention. Speaking at a financial event in Mumbai, Malhotra indicated that the central bank remains prepared to act decisively to curb excessive volatility, a statement that traders interpreted as a green light for additional rupee support. RBI’s Stance on Currency Management Governor Malhotra’s remarks come at a time when the rupee has been under pressure from global factors including a strong dollar and rising crude oil prices. However, his clear signaling that the RBI is willing to deploy tools such as direct dollar sales, liquidity management, and forward market operations has provided a fresh tailwind for the domestic currency. The rupee strengthened past the 83.50 mark against the dollar, a level that had previously acted as strong resistance. Market participants noted that Malhotra’s language marked a shift from the RBI’s traditionally guarded communication style. By openly discussing intervention readiness, the central bank aims to anchor expectations and deter speculative short positions on the rupee. This approach aligns with the RBI’s broader mandate of maintaining orderly market conditions without targeting a specific exchange rate. Implications for Importers and Inflation A stronger rupee offers immediate relief for Indian importers, particularly those dealing in crude oil, edible oils, and electronics. Lower import costs can help ease domestic inflationary pressures, which the RBI has been battling through its monetary policy stance. Analysts estimate that every 1-rupee appreciation against the dollar reduces India’s crude oil import bill by roughly ₹10,000 crore annually. However, export-oriented sectors such as textiles, IT services, and pharmaceuticals may face headwinds as their products become relatively more expensive in global markets. The RBI’s intervention strategy appears calibrated to balance these competing interests, preventing both runaway depreciation and excessive appreciation that could hurt export competitiveness. Market Reaction and Forward Outlook Following Malhotra’s comments, the rupee touched an intraday high of 83.38 against the dollar, its strongest level in three weeks. Bond yields also eased marginally as the market priced in reduced currency risk. Traders are now watching for any actual intervention in the spot and forward markets, with many expecting the RBI to continue its active management approach in the near term. The central bank’s ability to sustain the rupee’s rally will depend on external factors such as the Federal Reserve’s interest rate path and global risk sentiment. Nevertheless, Malhotra’s clear communication has provided a psychological floor for the currency, at least for now. Conclusion The Indian rupee’s recent rally reflects a combination of proactive RBI policy signaling and improved market sentiment. Governor Malhotra’s openness to further intervention has strengthened the currency’s near-term outlook, though structural challenges remain. For businesses and investors, the key takeaway is that the RBI is prepared to use its arsenal to manage volatility, making aggressive bets against the rupee riskier in the current environment. FAQs Q1: What did RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra say about rupee intervention? He stated that the RBI is prepared to take further action to curb excessive volatility in the foreign exchange market, signaling a willingness to intervene more aggressively if needed. Q2: How does a stronger rupee affect the Indian economy? A stronger rupee reduces import costs, helping to lower inflation, but it can hurt export competitiveness for sectors like textiles and IT services. Q3: What tools does the RBI use to influence the rupee’s value? The RBI uses direct dollar sales in the spot market, forward market operations, liquidity adjustments, and verbal intervention through official statements to manage currency volatility. This post Indian Rupee Extends Gains as RBI Governor Malhotra Signals Willingness to Intervene Further first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

25 May 2026, 05:51

3 Things That May Move Bitcoin and Crypto Markets This Week

Crypto markets have remained flat over the past day, but had a weekend boost after US President Trump hinted that a “largely negotiated” deal with Iran was imminent. “It also appears further progress has been made toward a 60-day ceasefire extension for the Iran War,” said the Kobeissi Letter. This week will see key inflation reports, which could put further pressure on the economy and the central bank. Economic Events May 25 to 29 US markets are closed on Monday for Memorial Day, but there is likely to be some movement in stock futures and crypto as investors digest any US-Iran peace deal agreements. In his latest statement, Trump was typically evasive.“If I made a deal with Iran, it will be a good and proper one,” he said, countering comments from Sunday suggesting it was almost finalized. According to Axios, the White House no longer expects an agreement with Iran to be announced on Monday and thinks it could take “several more days.” Tuesday kicks off the economic data for the week with May’s consumer confidence report, which will reflect the increase in inflation. Thursday is the big data day, with April’s Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE) and first-quarter GDP data. “Headline spending will be lifted by higher gasoline prices, but otherwise we are likely to see some weakness,” said ING economist James Knightley in a note. The PCE figures “will do little to ease inflation concerns in an environment where freight costs are rising appreciably in response to higher motor fuel costs,” he added. Key Events This Week: 1. US-Iran Agreement Details – Expected Today 2. US Markets Closed, Memorial Day – Monday 3. May Consumer Confidence data – Tuesday 4. April PCE Inflation data – Thursday 5. US Q1 2026 GDP data – Thursday 6. April New Home Sales data – Thursday We… — The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) May 24, 2026 New home sales for April and weekly jobless claims data are also due this week, but focus will primarily be on the POTUS and a deal with Iran. Crypto Market Outlook Crypto market capitalization has not moved over the past 24 hours, but Bitcoin and its brethren quickly recovered from Saturday’s dump. BTC fell to $76,000 in late Sunday trading but rapidly recovered to reclaim $77,000 during the Monday morning Asian session. Weekly resistance currently lies at $78,000, an area that could be broken if positive news on a deal emerges this week. Ether prices continue to weaken, with the asset falling below $2,100 on Monday morning. The altcoins remain mostly flat with minor gains for Hyperliquid , Zcash, and Monero. The post 3 Things That May Move Bitcoin and Crypto Markets This Week appeared first on CryptoPotato .

25 May 2026, 05:08

Polkadot’s Issuance Reset: Can Cleaner DOT Tokenomics Revive Interest?

Polkadot is in the middle of a sweeping rethink of how its economy works. Community discussions and on-chain governance have centered on an “issuance reset” and cleaner tokenomics that could make DOT’s supply, staking rewards, and network funding more predictable. This matters because token design shapes everything from staking yields to builder incentives to market narratives. If Polkadot simplifies issuance and aligns incentives under Polkadot 2.0 and Agile Coretime, it could reset how investors and developers value DOT—without guarantees, and with real trade-offs. Below, we unpack what an issuance reset actually means, why it’s being considered now, how it may affect staking, parachains, and Treasury flows, and what signals to watch. This article is educational and not financial advice. Quick Answer A Polkadot “issuance reset” refers to recalibrating how new DOT enters circulation and where it goes (stakers, Treasury, network costs), with the goal of simpler, more predictable tokenomics aligned to Polkadot 2.0. If executed via OpenGov, it could steady inflation, make staking yields easier to understand, and better tie DOT demand to network usage, though outcomes depend on adoption and governance choices. Seeks clearer, possibly flatter issuance versus legacy variable dynamics. Reorients incentives for staking, Treasury, and parachain (now coretime) activity. Could reduce narrative friction and improve comparability with other L1s. Risks include lower headline yields, governance uncertainty, and market apathy. What does an issuance reset actually mean on Polkadot? In Polkadot’s context, issuance is the rate at which new DOT is minted and distributed. Historically, Polkadot’s design balanced inflation, staking rewards, and network funding in a dynamic way tied to participation targets. Over time, this became hard for average users to model and for builders to plan around. An “issuance reset” is not a hard fork or a promise of deflation. It is a governance-led recalibration that aims to simplify and clarify the rules for new DOT creation and distribution. In practice, that often means considering a steadier inflation policy and a more explicit split of issuance between staking, the Treasury, and any network maintenance buckets. The aim: fewer moving parts, less guesswork. Crucially, any reset would go through Polkadot’s on-chain governance (OpenGov), where proposals and referenda are debated and voted on. You can track active discussions and votes on platforms like Polkassembly ( https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/ ) and learn OpenGov mechanics via the Polkadot Wiki ( OpenGov docs ). The motivation is straightforward: simpler tokenomics are easier to communicate, compare, and evaluate. For a multichain network competing with streamlined narratives from Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos, clarity is a feature. Why now? Polkadot 2.0 and Agile Coretime change the economics Polkadot 2.0, which centers on the Agile Coretime marketplace, replaces the old parachain slot auctions and crowdloans with a more flexible way for teams to acquire blockspace. That change alone alters the demand vectors for DOT and reshapes how value circulates between builders, validators, and the Treasury. Under auctions, large pools of DOT were bonded for long periods, indirectly affecting circulating supply and creating distinct incentives for contributors. Coretime aims to make blockspace a tradable commodity purchasable in shorter increments, which could smooth demand but also remove the old “headline” lock-ups that some market participants associated with supply absorption. Because the resource model has changed, it makes sense to revisit issuance and distribution. A reset could align DOT’s inflation with the new blockspace market, set clearer expectations for how staking rewards evolve as the staking ratio moves, and define predictable Treasury budgets to fund public goods and protocol development. For an overview of Polkadot 2.0 concepts and the Agile Coretime design, consult the Polkadot Wiki entries ( wiki.polkadot.network ), which summarize current architecture and link to technical materials. How might a reset shift supply and demand for DOT? Issuance is one side of the ledger. The other is demand: staking, fees, coretime purchases, and governance bonding. A cleaner policy could influence each of these in different ways. On the supply side, a flatter, more transparent inflation schedule may reduce uncertainty premiums for long-term holders. If the community decides to channel a defined share of new issuance into staking rewards and a defined share into the Treasury, future cash flows become easier to model. Predictability can help long-horizon allocators, though it can also surface trade-offs if headline yields compress. On the demand side, two levers stand out. First, Agile Coretime creates a direct avenue for teams to buy execution capacity, potentially increasing recurring DOT demand from builders if network usage grows. Second, the Treasury—funded by fees and potentially a portion of issuance—can deploy capital to stimulate ecosystems. Transparent rules for Treasury inflows and outflows matter because they shape whether DOT issuance finances durable public goods or becomes perceived sell pressure. None of this ensures price appreciation. Cleaner tokenomics can remove friction, but adoption, developer traction, and market cycles still dominate outcomes. The reset is best understood as “plumbing” that can support better narratives if utility follows. What does this mean for stakers, validators, and LST users? For stakers and validators, the key variable is how issuance splits and the network’s target staking ratio are expressed post-reset. If rewards become more predictable at a given staking participation level, operators can plan infrastructure and cash flow more confidently—but net yields could drift down or up depending on final parameters and the share of DOT staked. Liquid staking users (via protocols that issue staked DOT receipts) should also think in distributions, not absolutes. If the reset compresses gross yields, LST APYs may trend lower, even as the predictability of those yields improves. Conversely, if the staking ratio falls and issuance to staking is fixed, per-staker yields could rise—with higher volatility if participation swings. Validator operators should model two stress cases: lower-than-expected issuance to staking, and higher-than-expected operational costs. Nominators should assess counterparty risks for custodial staking and smart-contract risks for liquid staking. The Polkadot Wiki’s staking overview ( staking docs ) is a useful baseline for mechanics and slashing. Pro tip: In any issuance change, watch the network-wide staking ratio and validator set profitability. If participation spikes without a matching reward pool, individual yields can fall faster than headlines imply. Who benefits—and who might lose—from cleaner tokenomics? Clear rules tend to benefit planners. That includes developers budgeting coretime, foundations and DAOs proposing Treasury-funded initiatives, long-term validators, and institutions that need deterministic models. A predictable Treasury share can stabilize grant programs and infrastructure investments, supporting utility. However, there are trade-offs. If the reset results in fewer headline-grabbing lock-ups and lower nominal yields, momentum traders may lose an easy narrative. Liquid staking protocols could see tighter spreads if the market bids up LSTs closer to spot DOT as confidence in yield continuity grows, shaving off carry. And if the Treasury’s share is seen as too large or inefficiently deployed, the market could infer dilution with weak ROI. For parachain teams, moving from auctions to coretime is a double-edged sword: capital efficiency improves, but the implicit marketing boost of a crowdloan campaign fades. Teams must compete on product-market fit rather than token-driven bonding mechanics. Those with real user demand could thrive; those relying on token engineering may find it tougher. How does Polkadot compare with other L1 token models after a reset? Comparisons are nuanced, but it helps to situate Polkadot’s direction relative to peers. Below is a qualitative snapshot of design philosophies, not a scoreboard. Policies evolve; always confirm current details on official resources like the Polkadot Wiki, Ethereum docs, and Cosmos Hub governance pages. NetworkInflation policySecurity budget sourceFee burnBlockspace accessToken’s core rolesPolkadot (pre-reset)Dynamic issuance with staking-linked mechanicsNew issuance + feesNo native base-fee burnParachain slot auctions, long bondingStaking, governance, bonding for parachains, feesPolkadot (post-reset, conceptually)Cleaner, possibly flatter issuance with explicit splitsDefined issuance shares + fees + TreasuryNo base-fee burn; Treasury allocation may adjust flowsAgile Coretime marketplace (shorter-duration)Staking, governance, coretime, fees, Treasury fundingEthereumProgrammatic issuance to validatorsIssuance to stakers; base-fee burn offsetsYes (EIP-1559 base-fee burn)Permissionless execution; no auctionsGas, staking (via validators), DA bonding (ecosystem)Cosmos Hub (ATOM)Governance-tuned inflationInflation-driven staking rewards + feesNo base-fee burn by defaultApp-chain sovereignty; no shared auctionsStaking, governance, interchain security (optional) The headline: Polkadot appears to be converging on clearer, planner-friendly rules similar in spirit (but not identical) to peers that emphasize predictability. The distinguishing feature remains shared security and now a market for coretime, which, if it works as designed, makes DOT a native unit of compute access across a multi-core network. What should DOT holders and builders watch over the next quarters? Whether cleaner tokenomics revive interest depends on execution and usage. A practical watchlist helps you separate signal from noise. Governance outcomes: Track issuance-related referenda and their parameters on Polkassembly ( Polkadot OpenGov ). Staking ratio and yield trend: Monitor the percentage of DOT staked and realized APYs for validators and LSTs. Sharp changes can foreshadow re-pricing. Coretime demand: Are teams buying coretime consistently? Sustained usage implies recurring DOT demand from builders. Treasury health and deployment: Transparent, ROI-positive grants and infrastructure investments can turn issuance into ecosystem growth instead of sell pressure. Developer traction: Active repos, shipped features, and user-facing launches on parachains matter more than token headlines. Liquidity and custody: Exchange reserves, on-chain liquidity depth, and LST liquidity inform how quickly markets can move through new narratives. For macro context, keep an eye on broader risk appetite, rates, and crypto cycle dynamics. Cleaner tokenomics can help, but they won’t override global liquidity regimes. Scenario planning: best, base, and bear Any governance-led change invites scenario thinking rather than single-point predictions. Here’s a pragmatic framework to evaluate outcomes as data arrives. Best case: The reset lands with credible parameters, staking yields remain competitive, coretime demand ramps as more teams ship, and the Treasury funds visible public goods. Market participants reward the clarity, and DOT benefits from both narrative and usage tailwinds. Base case: The reset improves transparency but produces mixed incentives. Some yields compress, and the market waits for concrete adoption. DOT trades more in line with fundamentals; dispersion grows between productive parachains and weaker ones. Bear case: The reset is either delayed or perceived as poorly calibrated. Yields undershoot expectations, coretime demand is tepid, and Treasury deployment is questioned. The market discounts the reset as cosmetic, and attention migrates to faster-growing ecosystems. Whichever path emerges, a continuous feedback loop between governance, builders, and users will set the trajectory. The good news: on-chain governance lets parameters be iterated as evidence accumulates. Practical checklist before you make a move Before adjusting positions or roadmaps around an issuance reset, run through this quick diligence list: Read the actual referendum text and rationale; don’t trade off headlines. Model cash flows under multiple staking participation levels and issuance splits. Stress-test validator economics for fee variance and downtime risk. For LSTs, assess smart-contract audits, rehypothecation policies, and liquidity depth. For teams, estimate coretime costs across adoption scenarios and funding runway. Review Treasury reporting and grant processes; favor ecosystems with measurable ROI. Plan custody and tax implications for any changes in staking or liquidity usage. Common Mistakes Equating “reset” with deflation. A reset can still be inflationary. Read the parameters before assuming supply will shrink. Chasing APY screenshots. Headline yields can change quickly as participation moves. Look at net-of-fees, slashing-adjusted, and duration-adjusted returns. Ignoring governance timelines. Referenda, enactment delays, and implementation details can stretch across months. Position sizes accordingly. Overconcentrating in a single LST. Smart-contract risk, liquidity gaps, and oracle dependencies can compound. Diversify or use native staking if appropriate. Assuming Treasury spending equals sell pressure. Some grants fund infra that expands demand over time. Evaluate program quality, not just amounts. For builders, underestimating product-market fit. Without crowdloan marketing, coretime purchases must be justified by real usage. Budget with conservative adoption ramps. For ongoing coverage and practical explainers on Polkadot and broader Web3, visit Crypto Daily at cryptodaily.co.uk . Frequently Asked Questions Will an issuance reset burn existing DOT? There is no inherent burn in the concept of a reset. It is primarily about redefining how new issuance is calibrated and distributed. Any burn mechanic would need to be explicitly proposed, approved, and implemented through governance. Could DOT become deflationary after the reset? Deflation would require net token reductions (burns exceeding issuance). Polkadot does not have a default base-fee burn like Ethereum’s EIP-1559. While fee sinks or other mechanisms can be considered, treating deflation as a given would be speculative. How might staking yields change? It depends on the final issuance split and the network’s staking participation. If issuance to staking is fixed, higher participation can dilute per-staker yields; if participation is low, per-staker yields can rise. Monitor enacted parameters and the live staking ratio. What happens to parachain teams that relied on crowdloans? With Agile Coretime, teams acquire blockspace in a more flexible market. Legacy crowdloans followed their own timelines set by each project. For any remaining obligations or conversions, consult the parachain’s official channels and governance posts. Does the Treasury get more power under cleaner tokenomics? Cleaner rules can make Treasury inflows and outflows more transparent, not necessarily larger. The community decides the Treasury’s share and spending priorities through OpenGov. Outcomes hinge on proposal quality and accountability. Will Kusama test these changes first? Historically, Kusama has been used to trial upgrades before Polkadot. Many economic and governance changes debut there, but it’s not automatic. Check the relevant referenda on each network. How can I follow and participate in the reset process? Read proposals on Polkassembly ( Polkadot OpenGov ), review background on the Polkadot Wiki, and vote with your DOT using supported wallets and interfaces. Participation details and safety guidelines are outlined in the OpenGov documentation. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

25 May 2026, 05:00

AUD/JPY Price Forecast: Bullish Bias Strengthens Above Key 100-Day EMA Support

BitcoinWorld AUD/JPY Price Forecast: Bullish Bias Strengthens Above Key 100-Day EMA Support The AUD/JPY currency pair is gaining upward traction, maintaining a bullish bias after holding firmly above the 100-day exponential moving average (EMA). Traders are watching closely as the pair consolidates recent gains, supported by a favorable risk environment and diverging monetary policy expectations between the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Bank of Japan. Technical Outlook: Support and Resistance Levels From a technical perspective, the 100-day EMA has emerged as a critical support level, providing a floor for recent pullbacks. The pair is currently trading above this moving average, which often acts as a dynamic support in uptrends. The next resistance zone lies near the recent swing high around 96.50, with a break above that opening the door toward the 97.00 psychological level. On the downside, immediate support is at the 100-day EMA near 94.80, followed by the 200-day EMA around 93.50. Momentum indicators are leaning bullish. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is hovering in neutral-to-bullish territory, suggesting room for further upside before becoming overbought. The MACD histogram is showing positive momentum, reinforcing the bullish case. However, traders should remain cautious of any sudden shifts in risk sentiment that could trigger profit-taking. Fundamental Drivers: Risk Appetite and Policy Divergence The Australian dollar has been supported by improved global risk appetite, partly driven by easing trade tensions and resilient economic data from China, Australia’s largest trading partner. Meanwhile, the Japanese yen remains under pressure as the Bank of Japan maintains its ultra-loose monetary policy stance, keeping yields low and encouraging carry trade flows into higher-yielding currencies like the Aussie. Market participants are also pricing in the possibility of further rate hikes from the Reserve Bank of Australia if inflation remains sticky, while the Bank of Japan shows little urgency to normalize policy. This policy divergence is a key tailwind for AUD/JPY, as interest rate differentials favor the Australian dollar. What This Means for Traders For forex traders, the current setup suggests a cautiously bullish bias, with the 100-day EMA acting as a reliable support level. Short-term traders may look for buying opportunities on dips toward the moving average, while longer-term positions could target the 97.00 resistance area. However, any unexpected deterioration in risk sentiment—such as a sharp equity market selloff or geopolitical shock—could quickly reverse the pair’s gains, making stop-loss placement essential. Conclusion AUD/JPY’s ability to hold above the 100-day EMA signals underlying strength, supported by a favorable risk backdrop and policy divergence between Australia and Japan. While the technical outlook remains constructive, traders should monitor key resistance levels and be prepared for volatility. The pair’s next directional move will likely depend on upcoming economic data from both countries and shifts in global risk appetite. FAQs Q1: What is the 100-day EMA and why is it important for AUD/JPY? The 100-day exponential moving average is a widely watched technical indicator that smooths out price data over 100 days, giving more weight to recent prices. It acts as a dynamic support or resistance level. For AUD/JPY, holding above this level is considered a bullish signal, suggesting the uptrend remains intact. Q2: What are the key support and resistance levels for AUD/JPY? Key support is at the 100-day EMA near 94.80, followed by the 200-day EMA around 93.50. On the upside, resistance is at the recent swing high of 96.50, then the psychological 97.00 level. Q3: How do RBA and Bank of Japan policies affect AUD/JPY? The Reserve Bank of Australia’s relatively hawkish stance (potential for further rate hikes) supports the Australian dollar, while the Bank of Japan’s ultra-loose policy keeps the yen weak. This interest rate differential favors AUD/JPY appreciation, as traders seek higher yields. This post AUD/JPY Price Forecast: Bullish Bias Strengthens Above Key 100-Day EMA Support first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

25 May 2026, 04:55

Gold Holds Gains as Iran Diplomacy Eases Dollar Pressure, but Rally Faces Headwinds

BitcoinWorld Gold Holds Gains as Iran Diplomacy Eases Dollar Pressure, but Rally Faces Headwinds Gold prices maintained their recent upward momentum on Thursday, supported by a softer U.S. dollar as diplomatic efforts surrounding Iran’s nuclear program tempered safe-haven demand for the greenback. However, analysts caution that the yellow metal’s upside may remain constrained by a resilient Federal Reserve rate outlook and improving global risk appetite. Diplomatic Developments Weigh on the Dollar Reports of renewed talks between Western powers and Iran over nuclear restrictions have reduced geopolitical risk premiums, particularly in energy markets. This has eased some of the safe-haven buying that had bolstered the dollar in recent weeks. A weaker dollar typically benefits gold, which is priced in the greenback and becomes more attractive to holders of other currencies. Spot gold was last seen trading near $2,340 per ounce, holding onto gains from earlier in the week. The metal had rallied from around $2,300 as uncertainty over Middle East tensions and trade policy fluctuations drove investors toward traditional stores of value. Upside Potential Capped by Fed and Risk Appetite Despite the near-term tailwind from dollar softness, several factors suggest gold’s rally may be limited. The Federal Reserve has maintained a cautious stance on rate cuts, with several officials signaling that inflation remains above the 2% target. Higher interest rates increase the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold. Additionally, equity markets have shown resilience, with major indices hovering near record levels. A sustained risk-on environment could divert capital away from gold and into higher-yielding assets. Market Implications for Investors For traders and investors, the current gold price action reflects a tug-of-war between geopolitical uncertainty and monetary policy expectations. The metal remains sensitive to any shift in U.S. economic data or Fed rhetoric. A surprise escalation in Iran tensions could reignite safe-haven demand, while a stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs report could push gold lower. Gold’s ability to hold above the $2,300 support level is a positive technical signal, but sustained gains above $2,400 may require a clearer catalyst, such as a dovish Fed pivot or a deterioration in global growth outlook. Conclusion Gold’s recent stability reflects a market balancing diplomatic progress with lingering macroeconomic uncertainties. While the dollar’s retreat offers near-term support, the broader outlook hinges on the trajectory of U.S. interest rates and the evolution of geopolitical risks. Investors should watch for upcoming Fed commentary and economic data for clearer direction. FAQs Q1: Why does the U.S. dollar affect gold prices? A weaker dollar makes gold cheaper for buyers using other currencies, increasing demand and pushing prices higher. Conversely, a stronger dollar tends to weigh on gold. Q2: What is the connection between Iran diplomacy and gold? Progress in Iran nuclear talks can reduce geopolitical tensions, lowering safe-haven demand for the U.S. dollar and indirectly supporting gold prices. Q3: Can gold prices rise if the Fed keeps rates high? Historically, high interest rates are a headwind for gold because they increase the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. However, gold can still rise if other factors—such as inflation or geopolitical fear—outweigh rate concerns. This post Gold Holds Gains as Iran Diplomacy Eases Dollar Pressure, but Rally Faces Headwinds first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

25 May 2026, 04:26

DeXe, Humanity, Venice Token lead crypto market gains as liquidations plunge

The crypto market wavered on Monday morning as investors embraced a risk-on sentiment amid hopes of a deal between the US and Iran. Bitcoin (BTC) price was held below $77,000, while the market capitalization of all tokens remained flat at $2.56 trillion. Some tokens, however, continued their uptrend that started on Saturday. DeXe token jumped by over 24%, while Humanity Protocol (H), Venice Token (VVV), Morpho (MORPHO), and Ondo rose by over 5% in the last 24 hours. Top crypto gainers today | Source: CMC Crypto market waits for US-Iran deal Bitcoin and most altcoins rebounded on Saturday after President Trump announced that the US and Iran were working on a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Media reports suggest that the deal will see the US end its blockade against Iranian ports in exchange for Iran reopening the Strait. The reports also suggest that the two countries will start a 60-day ceasefire, in which they will seek to find an agreement on its nuclear program. These reports, if confirmed, would be positive for the crypto market as they would lead to lower energy prices and inflationary pressures. Indeed, data shows that the Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) tumbled below $100 today. This sell-off started as soon as Trump made the announcement, with traders on platforms like Hyperliquid experiencing the most benefits. Still, the crypto market action has been a bit muted because Trump is yet to announce the deal. He has also said that he will not be in a hurry to reach an agreement, raising concerns that things might go south. Besides, some of T rump’s closest allies, like Senator Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz , have all blasted the deal for empowering Iran. Most importantly, Trump is known to change his mind based on the last person he talks to. As such, traders are likely waiting for him to announce the deal officially. Liquidations plunge as futures open interest eases The crypto market is also on edge amid falling volume and futures open interest. Data shows that the 24-hour volume dropped by 22% to $60 billion, the lowest figure in months. At the same time, the futures open interest dropped by over 1.1% in the last 24 hours to $124 billion. Bitcoin’s open interest dropped by 1.75% in the last 24 hours, while Ethereum’s OI fell by 1.30%. Some of the top tokens that experienced a surge in OI were Hyperliquid (HYPE), Zcash (ZEC), and Binance Coin (BNB). The volume will likely be limited on Monday because of the US and UK public holidays. The US is celebrating the Memorial Day weekend, while the UK has a bank holiday. Liquidations also plunged in the last 24 hours. It dropped by 70% tp $221 million, with bullish positions worth of Ethereum and Bitcoin worth $70 million and $58 million being liquidated. Liquidations happen when exchanges shut down loss-making leveraged positions to protect their capital. Looking ahead, the crypto market will react to the upcoming macro data from the US, including consumer confidence on Tuesday, and PCE and GDP reports on Thursday. These are important numbers that will have an impact on the Federal Reserve. The post DeXe, Humanity, Venice Token lead crypto market gains as liquidations plunge appeared first on Invezz