hodler

19 Mar 2026, 16:25

Quant (QNT) Price Jumps 10% after SEC’s Historic Decision

Key Highlights Quant (QNT) price has soared by 10%, helping it to climb from $69.89 to $76.89 with bullish momentum The rally in QNT occurred after the SEC announced that it would allow Nasdaq to support the trading of tokenized shares The price surge in the QNT was seen amid the correction in the crypto market after the Federal Reserve revealed its decision to hold interest rates steady in the recent FOMC meeting On March 19, Quant (QNT) price experienced a rally with a 10% jump despite the correction in the overall crypto market, including Bitcoin, which dropped below $70,000. The rally in Quant (QNT) has helped the cryptocurrency to soar from $69.89 to $76.89, with a market capitalization of $927.95 million, according to CoinMarketCap . Along with the jump in the Quant price, the daily trading volume also increased by 117%, helping it to reach $32.20 million. Quant (QNT) Price Surges After SEC Shows Openness to Trading Tokenized Assets The price movement came during the downward momentum in the crypto market and after the Securities and Exchange Commission approved Nasdaq rules on March 18. It will allow trading of tokenized securities alongside traditional stocks despite backlash from trading groups. This major regulatory development has boosted investors’ confidence as they are seeing it as a major event for blockchain-based assets because it opens the door for real-world assets like stocks and exchange-traded funds to be integrated on digital ledgers while staying in line with compliance requirements. However, the crypto market is facing selling pressure after a weekly rally due to macroeconomic factors. On March 18, the Federal Reserve declared its decision to hold interest rates steady between 3.5% and 3.75% because of growing inflation and the global energy crisis due to the war between Israel, the U.S., and Iran. The biggest cryptocurrency, Bitcoin (BTC) has plunged by over 2% on a daily chart, while Ethereum also witnessed a similar drop. The growing trading activity is showing that buyers have taken place quickly after major developments in regulations. Technical indicators like RSI, MACD, and others are justifying the technical factors behind the rally in the QNT price. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently revolving around the 68 to 72 range. This indicates a good buying interest without reaching overbought levels, so the token still has room to grow before any pause. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence is showing a good buying setup because its lines are growing above the zero mark. This shows the upward momentum in the cryptocurrency in the short term. According to Tradingview, the QNT is now trading above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with the shorter-term lines heading upward. These averages are working as reliable support lines that confirm the bullish momentum. The SEC approval for Nasdaq tokenized securities trading will allow high-volume stocks from the Russell 1000 index and major exchange-traded funds to trade as digital tokens on the same order book as traditional shares, with settlement executed through the Depository Trust Company. This will create a regulated on-ramp for real-world assets to go live on blockchain. Tokenised deposits promise to transform #bankinginfrastructure , but fragmentation could undermine the entire project. Every major institution is building its own protocols and compliance controls in isolation, reproducing the very inefficiencies they were supposed to solve.… pic.twitter.com/gRqYKhq5fV — Quant (@quantnetwork) March 16, 2026 Quant will play a major role in the book of tokenization because its Overledger operating system connects more than 45 different blockchains in a secure way that allows banks and companies to issue and move tokenized assets across networks without using risky bridges, which often become a soft target for hackers. Also Read: Ethereum Price Drops 6% Amid Rising Leverage and ETF Outflows

19 Mar 2026, 16:22

Spot Bitcoin ETFs see $163.5M outflows on macro pressure

A sharp pullback in Bitcoin has interrupted what had been one of the strongest institutional accumulation phases in recent months, with US spot Bitcoin ETFs recording their first net outflows after a sustained inflow streak. According to Farside data, spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $163.5 million in net outflows on Wednesday, snapping a seven-day run that had brought in roughly $1.16 billion. The reversal comes just days after funds logged their largest single-day intake of $250.92 million and extended a broader four-week inflow stretch totalling $2.52 billion. Selling pressure was led by the Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund, which posted about $104 million in outflows, followed by BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust at $34 million. Prior to the latest outflows, cumulative flows were nearing a turning point, sitting roughly $100 million short of positive year-to-date territory, marking the end of the longest inflow streak since October 2025. Why are Bitcoin ETFs seeing outflows? The outflows came as Bitcoin dropped more than 8% from weekly highs above $75,000, with the asset slipping back below the $70,000 level at the time of writing. That level remains a key psychological support, and failure to reclaim it could weigh further on market sentiment. That threshold has long been viewed as a key psychological support, and a sustained failure to reclaim it could weigh further on market confidence. Institutional investors are reacting to a combination of macroeconomic pressures. Hotter than expected producer price data showed core PPI rising to 3.9% year over year, above estimates of 3.7%, and 0.5% month over month, exceeding expectations of 0.3%, reinforcing concerns that inflation remains persistent. At the same time, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cautioned that inflation remains elevated, pointing to additional pressure from rising energy prices linked to ongoing tensions in the Middle East. He noted that headline PCE inflation stands at 2.8% while core inflation is at 3.0%, both above the Fed’s 2% target, and signalled that the central bank will remain data-dependent as it is too early to declare victory. The Federal Open Market Committee’s decision to hold rates steady in the 3.5% to 3.75% range further reinforced expectations of a higher for longer rate environment. While markets had largely anticipated a hawkish tone following recent economic data, the combination of policy signals and inflation prints appears to have pushed institutional investors into a more defensive stance. Up until recently, institutional demand had been supported by Bitcoin’s digital gold narrative, helping sustain its recovery from multi-month lows despite geopolitical tensions and rising oil prices. However, the latest macro developments have begun to test that conviction as price action weakens. Losses extend beyond Bitcoin The negative trend extended across altcoin ETFs, with Ether leading the outflows at around $56 million, according to Farside data. Fidelity again led the declines among Ether products, with the Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) seeing $37 million in outflows, followed by the Grayscale Ethereum Trust (ETHE) at $9 million. Solana products recorded relatively minor outflows of about $300,000, while XRP ETFs reported no inflows during the session. At presstime, the total crypto market cap had fallen over 2% in the past 24 hours, losing the $2.5 trillion mark. The post Spot Bitcoin ETFs see $163.5M outflows on macro pressure appeared first on Invezz

19 Mar 2026, 16:05

Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $69,000 Amid Market Volatility

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $69,000 Amid Market Volatility Global cryptocurrency markets witnessed a significant shift on Thursday, March 20, 2025, as the Bitcoin price fell decisively below the $69,000 threshold. According to real-time data from Bitcoin World market monitoring, the premier digital asset was trading at $68,952.14 on the Binance USDT perpetual futures market at the time of reporting. This movement represents a notable pullback from recent highs and has captured the attention of traders and analysts worldwide. The price action underscores the inherent volatility within the cryptocurrency sector, even for its most established asset. Bitcoin Price Action and Immediate Market Context The descent below $69,000 marks a critical technical and psychological level for Bitcoin. Market participants closely monitor round-number thresholds, as they often act as support or resistance zones. Consequently, this breach triggered a wave of automated sell orders and liquidations across major derivatives exchanges. Data from Coinglass indicates that over $120 million in long positions were liquidated in the 24 hours surrounding this price move. Furthermore, the trading volume on spot markets spiked by approximately 35%, signaling heightened activity and potential capitulation from short-term holders. Several concurrent factors contributed to this downward pressure. Firstly, on-chain analytics from Glassnode reveal a substantial increase in Bitcoin transfers to exchange wallets. This metric often precedes selling activity. Secondly, broader macroeconomic sentiment showed signs of strain. Recent statements from the Federal Reserve regarding persistent inflation concerns have strengthened the US Dollar Index (DXY). Historically, a stronger dollar creates headwinds for risk assets like Bitcoin. Finally, profit-taking by investors who entered the market during the previous rally below $60,000 likely exacerbated the sell-off. Technical Analysis Perspective From a chart analysis standpoint, the $69,000 level coincided with the 50-day simple moving average (SMA), a key trend indicator watched by institutional traders. A sustained break below this moving average can signal a shift in medium-term momentum. The next significant support zone, according to technical analysts, lies between $67,500 and $68,000, an area that previously acted as resistance in early February. The Relative Strength Index (RSI), a momentum oscillator, dipped into neutral territory, moving away from overbought conditions seen just days prior. Historical Volatility and Cryptocurrency Market Cycles Bitcoin’s price volatility is not an anomaly but a defining characteristic of its market behavior. For context, during the 2021 bull run, Bitcoin experienced multiple corrections exceeding 20% before reaching its all-time high. These pullbacks are often described as “healthy consolidations” that shake out speculative leverage and establish stronger foundations for future advances. The current market structure differs significantly from previous cycles due to increased institutional participation through spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). These financial products, approved in early 2024, have introduced a new layer of daily buying and selling pressure tied to traditional market flows. The table below illustrates key support and resistance levels following the drop: Level Price (USD) Significance Immediate Resistance $70,500 Previous support & psychological level Current Price $68,952 Post-decline trading level Key Support 1 $68,000 Early February consolidation zone Key Support 2 $67,200 200-hour moving average Market analysts emphasize that while short-term price movements generate headlines, the long-term adoption trajectory remains a separate narrative. Network fundamentals, such as hash rate and active address count, have continued to show resilience and growth throughout 2025. Impact on the Broader Crypto Ecosystem The decline in Bitcoin’s price invariably creates a ripple effect across the entire digital asset landscape. As the market leader, Bitcoin often sets the tone for altcoin performance. In this instance, major cryptocurrencies like Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and Cardano (ADA) also experienced correlated declines, typically ranging from 5% to 8%. This phenomenon, known as “high beta” behavior, means altcoins often fall more sharply than Bitcoin during downturns but may also rally more aggressively during recoveries. The derivatives market felt an immediate impact. Funding rates on perpetual swap contracts, which had been positive, turned neutral or slightly negative. This shift indicates that leverage is being unwound and the market is becoming less euphoric. Furthermore, the put/call ratio for Bitcoin options increased, showing a rise in demand for downside protection among sophisticated traders. Key impacts include: Leverage Reset: High leverage positions were liquidated, reducing systemic risk. Altcoin Correlation: Most top-50 cryptocurrencies declined in sync with BTC. ETF Flows: Daily net flows for US spot Bitcoin ETFs turned negative for the first time in a week. Market Sentiment: The Crypto Fear & Greed Index dropped from “Greed” to “Neutral.” Institutional and Regulatory Landscape The current price action occurs within an evolving regulatory framework. Recent guidance from financial authorities in major jurisdictions has provided more clarity for institutional custodians and asset managers. This regulatory maturation, while sometimes causing short-term uncertainty, is broadly viewed as a positive development for long-term market stability and legitimacy. The price dip below $69,000 is being watched closely by ETF issuers and traditional finance (TradFi) entities now involved in the space, as it tests their risk management and allocation strategies. Expert Analysis and Forward-Looking Indicators Market strategists offer varied perspectives on the move. Some frame it as a necessary correction after a sustained rally, pointing to on-chain metrics that suggested the market was overheated. Others cite macroeconomic pressures as the primary driver. Notably, analysts highlight that Bitcoin’s long-term holder supply—coins held for over 155 days—remains near all-time highs, suggesting conviction among core investors. Several forward-looking indicators will be critical to monitor: Exchange Net Flow: A sustained outflow of BTC from exchanges would signal accumulation. Miner Behavior: Miner selling pressure has been subdued, indicating operational health. Macro Data: Upcoming US employment and CPI inflation reports will influence risk appetite. Technical Reclamation: Whether Bitcoin can reclaim and hold the $70,000 level in the coming sessions. Historical data shows that sharp, high-volume declines often precede periods of consolidation before the next directional trend emerges. The market’s ability to absorb selling pressure without cascading into a deeper collapse will be a key test of underlying demand. Conclusion The Bitcoin price falling below $69,000 serves as a stark reminder of the asset’s volatile nature within the dynamic cryptocurrency market. While the immediate move triggers analysis of technical levels and market sentiment, it occurs within a broader context of increasing institutional adoption and regulatory definition. For investors, such volatility underscores the importance of risk management, diversification, and a focus on long-term fundamentals rather than short-term price fluctuations. The market’s response in the coming days, particularly around key support levels, will provide crucial signals for the next phase of Bitcoin’s price discovery. FAQs Q1: Why did Bitcoin fall below $69,000? The decline resulted from a combination of technical selling at a key level, profit-taking by short-term holders, a spike in exchange deposits, and broader macroeconomic headwinds from a strengthening US dollar. Q2: Is this a major crash for Bitcoin? Based on historical standards, a single-day move of this magnitude is considered a correction within an ongoing market cycle, not a crash. Bitcoin has experienced numerous similar pullbacks during previous bull markets. Q3: How does this affect Bitcoin ETFs? Spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced net outflows on the day of the decline, as some investors took profits. However, long-term ETF flows are more dependent on broader adoption trends than daily price moves. Q4: What is the next important support level for BTC? Technical analysts are watching the zone between $67,500 and $68,000, which served as a consolidation area in February. The 200-hour moving average near $67,200 is also a key level. Q5: Should investors be worried about this price drop? Volatility is inherent to cryptocurrency markets. Long-term investors typically focus on network adoption and macroeconomic trends rather than daily price swings. A diversified portfolio and clear risk strategy are essential for navigating such periods. This post Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $69,000 Amid Market Volatility first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

19 Mar 2026, 15:50

Gold Price Plummets as Fed’s Hawkish Outlook Crushes Bullion Sentiment

BitcoinWorld Gold Price Plummets as Fed’s Hawkish Outlook Crushes Bullion Sentiment Gold prices are experiencing significant downward pressure in global markets this week, primarily driven by a surprisingly hawkish monetary policy outlook from the U.S. Federal Reserve. Consequently, the strengthening U.S. dollar and rising Treasury yields are creating substantial headwinds for the non-yielding precious metal. Market analysts now point to a challenging short-term trajectory for bullion as investors reassess their positions in light of shifting central bank signals. Gold Price Reacts to Federal Reserve Policy Signals The immediate catalyst for the sell-off in gold markets stems from the latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting minutes and subsequent commentary from Fed officials. Specifically, the central bank has signaled a more aggressive approach to combating persistent inflation than many market participants anticipated. Therefore, expectations for the timing and magnitude of future interest rate cuts have been pushed further into 2025. This recalibration has a direct and powerful impact on gold’s fundamental valuation. Higher interest rates increase the opportunity cost of holding gold, which pays no interest or dividends. Simultaneously, they typically bolster the U.S. dollar, in which gold is globally priced. A stronger dollar makes gold more expensive for holders of other currencies, thereby dampening international demand. Recent trading data shows spot gold falling below the psychologically important $2,300 per ounce level, a threshold it had defended for several weeks. The Mechanics of Monetary Policy on Commodities To understand the pressure on gold, one must examine the transmission mechanism of Federal Reserve policy. When the Fed adopts a hawkish stance, it implies a commitment to maintaining higher policy rates for longer or even implementing further rate hikes. This action directly influences several key financial variables. Real Yields: Rising real interest rates (nominal rates minus inflation) diminish gold’s appeal as a store of value. Dollar Index (DXY): Hawkish policy attracts foreign capital into U.S. assets, boosting the dollar’s value and pressuring dollar-denominated commodities like gold. Investor Sentiment: The policy shift prompts institutional investors and ETF managers to reduce exposure to non-yielding assets. Historical analysis reveals a strong inverse correlation between U.S. real yields and the gold price over the past two decades. For instance, periods of Fed tightening in 2013 and 2018 saw pronounced gold bear markets. Currently, the 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) yield, a benchmark for real rates, has climbed to its highest level in months, creating a nearly perfect storm for gold bulls. Expert Analysis on Market Dynamics Market strategists from major financial institutions have been revising their gold forecasts downward. Jane Miller, Head of Commodities Research at Global Markets Advisory, notes, “The Fed’s data-dependent stance means every strong employment or inflation print directly undermines gold’s near-term prospects. We are witnessing a classic recalibration where traditional safe-haven flows are being outweighed by the sheer momentum of rate expectations.” Furthermore, data from the World Gold Council indicates a marked slowdown in physical gold purchases by central banks in the latest quarter, a sector that had provided robust support during previous pullbacks. This reduction in institutional buying removes a key pillar of demand, leaving the market more susceptible to financial selling pressure from futures and ETF markets. Comparative Performance and Sector Impact The pressure is not uniform across the precious metals complex. While gold struggles, other metals show divergent performances based on their industrial utility. Metal Price Change (Week) Primary Driver Gold (XAU) -3.2% Fed Hawkishness / Rising Yields Silver (XAG) -4.8% Leveraged to Gold, Higher Volatility Platinum (XPT) -1.5% Mixed Industrial/Auto Demand Palladium (XPD) +0.5% Tight Physical Supply Constraints This table illustrates how gold and its sister metal silver, often viewed as monetary metals, are bearing the brunt of the sell-off. Conversely, platinum group metals with stronger industrial fundamentals, particularly in automotive catalysts, are displaying more resilience. The mining sector is also feeling the strain, with major gold mining equities underperforming the underlying commodity due to operational leverage. Historical Context and Potential Support Levels The current downturn invites comparison to previous Fed tightening cycles. However, the present macroeconomic backdrop contains unique elements. Geopolitical tensions, while elevated, have not triggered the sustained flight-to-safety bids seen in early 2024. Moreover, global debt levels are significantly higher, which could eventually limit how far central banks can maintain restrictive policy without triggering financial stress. Technical analysts are monitoring several key support levels for gold. The 200-day moving average, currently near $2,150, represents a major long-term trend indicator. A breach of this level could signal a deeper correction. On the other hand, physical demand from key consumer markets like India and China often emerges on significant price dips, potentially providing a floor. The upcoming festival and wedding season in India, a traditional period of high gold purchasing, will be a critical test of underlying physical appetite. Conclusion The gold price is clearly under sustained pressure as the Federal Reserve’s commitment to a hawkish policy outlook reshapes the financial landscape. The resulting strength in the U.S. dollar and rise in real yields present formidable challenges for the bullion market. While long-term structural drivers for gold, such as central bank diversification and geopolitical uncertainty, remain intact, the short-term path is dominated by monetary policy dynamics. Market participants will now scrutinize every incoming U.S. economic data point for clues on the Fed’s next move, ensuring that volatility in the gold price will likely persist for the foreseeable future. FAQs Q1: Why does a hawkish Federal Reserve hurt the gold price? A hawkish Fed typically leads to higher interest rates and a stronger U.S. dollar. Gold, which pays no yield, becomes less attractive compared to interest-bearing assets, and its dollar-denominated price becomes more expensive for international buyers, reducing demand. Q2: What does ‘hawkish outlook’ mean in monetary policy? A ‘hawkish’ stance indicates that a central bank is primarily focused on combating inflation, even if it requires raising interest rates or keeping them elevated for an extended period. It contrasts with a ‘dovish’ stance, which prioritizes economic growth and employment. Q3: Are other precious metals affected the same way as gold? Not exactly. While silver often moves in correlation with gold, platinum and palladium have significant industrial uses (e.g., in automotive catalysts). Their prices can be more influenced by specific supply-demand dynamics in those sectors, sometimes insulating them from pure monetary policy moves. Q4: Could geopolitical risk reverse the downward trend in gold? Yes, historically, gold acts as a safe-haven asset during periods of geopolitical instability or financial market stress. A significant escalation in global tensions could trigger flight-to-safety buying that temporarily overrides the pressure from interest rates. Q5: Where do analysts see the next major support level for gold? Technical analysts often watch long-term moving averages, like the 200-day moving average, and previous areas of consolidation where buying interest emerged. Fundamental analysts monitor the cost of production for major miners, as sustained prices below production costs can lead to supply reductions. This post Gold Price Plummets as Fed’s Hawkish Outlook Crushes Bullion Sentiment first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

19 Mar 2026, 15:43

$1 Billion XRP Treasury Breakdown: How Much SBI Paid Per Share and Ripple Co-Founder Chris Larsen Involvement

New SEC S-4 filing reveals SBI Holdings paid $10/share as Ripple's Chris Larsen injects 261 million XRP into the $1 billion Evernorth (XRPN) Nasdaq treasury.

19 Mar 2026, 15:36

Unprecedented global supply shortage looms as Trump threatens total destruction of Iranian gas fields

Iran launched missile strikes on Ras Laffan Industrial City in Qatar in the early hours of Thursday, March 19, 2026, hitting one of the world’s most important liquefied natural gas centres and setting off a wave of energy attacks across the Gulf region. Several facilities experienced “extensive damage” and “sizeable fires” during the pre-dawn attack, according to state-owned QatarEnergy. This occurred one day following a strike at the Pearl Gas-to-Liquids facility. The extent of the damage was characterized as significant, but Qatar’s interior minister said that all fires had been extinguished and no casualties had been reported. The strikes are widely understood as Iran’s response to an Israeli attack the previous day on Iran’s South Pars gas field, the largest gas field in the world. That Israeli strike was the first time major fossil fuel production had been directly targeted since the United States and Israel launched military operations nearly three weeks ago. South Pars, which Iran shares with Qatar, produces up to 70% of Iran’s total gas output. Early reports indicate that sections responsible for about 12% of that output may have been hit. Trump distances U.S. from Israeli operation, issues stark warning U.S. President Donald Trump moved quickly to distance Washington from the Israeli operation. In posts on Truth Social, Trump said the U.S. “knew nothing” of the strike on South Pars and stressed that Qatar played no part in the attack. He said Israel would hold back from any further strikes on the Iranian field as long as Tehran stopped hitting Qatari facilities. But Trump also issued a stark warning. He wrote that “The United States of America, with or without the help or consent of Israel, will massively blow up the entirety of the South Pars Gas Field at an amount of strength and power that Iran has never seen or witnessed before” if Iran continues targeting Qatar. Additionally, the U.S. administration is reportedly considering sending thousands of troops to the area. In an attempt to reduce domestic fuel prices, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hinted that Washington would soon remove sanctions on 140 million barrels of Iranian oil that are now being detained aboard tankers. Trump’s threat raises fears o f a gl obal energy crisis Markets reacted immediately. Brent crude climbed more than 5%, briefly crossing $119 a barrel, close to its highest level in three and a half years. At the Dutch TTF hub, European natural gas prices increased by almost 16%, hitting a three-year high. The stock markets in Asia plummeted. Due to their heavy reliance on imported LNG, South Korea’s KOSPI sank by about 3%, and Japan’s Nikkei 225 plunged by 3.4%. While some supply outages can be swiftly resolved, analysts warn that the physical destruction of energy installations is a different story. Citing the events in Iraq and Ukraine, experts assert that large-scale energy infrastructure restoration following a conflict is a challenging process and that global supplies may be affected for years. A significant portion of the largest natural gas reserve in the world would be lost if Trump’s threat to totally demolish Iran’s South Pars gas field comes to pass. That kind of damage, on top of the hits already taken by Qatar LNG plants and the Strait of Hormuz staying closed, would create a long-term shortage of natural gas that cannot be fixed quickly. Repairs on this scale often take years. Oil prices could stay stuck above $100–120 a barrel, while natural gas prices in Europe and Asia would keep hitting record highs. Countries like Japan, South Korea, China, India, and parts of Europe that rely heavily on imported LNG would face serious shortages, pushing up inflation, hurting factories, slowing the whole world economy, and raising the chances of recessions in places most dependent on steady energy supplies. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .