hodler

4 Feb 2026, 16:47

Bessent Rules Out Bitcoin Bailout

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has shut the door on a potential "Bitcoin bailout," confirming to Congress that the U.S. will not use tax dollars to prop up the cryptocurrency market.

4 Feb 2026, 16:44

Bitcoin price remains stuck below $74K: why analysts see slide towards $60K

Bitcoin price continued falling for the sixth day on Wednesday, visiting levels last seen in November 2024 as risk sentiment remained fragile amidst a confluence of macro headwinds and a lack of demand. Driven by escalating geopolitical tensions and a rotation away from high-beta assets, the premier cryptocurrency plunged to a lows around $73,000 before staging a modest recovery toward the $76,000 mark. The total crypto market cap has fallen over 3% in the past 24 hours and hit a low of $2.5 trillion before recouping some of the losses. This broader retreat followed a staggering $467 billion wipeout in total market value since late January. Meanwhile, the crypto fear and greed index fell three points to 14, marking a fresh multi-month low and firmly anchoring the market in a state of extreme fear. Altcoins traded in the red throughout the day, with single-digit gains limited to stablecoins and a few isolated outliers. Why is Bitcoin price going down? Bitcoin price broke below critical support zones after confirming a 15-month low near $73,000, as a cascade of bearish catalysts continued to weigh heavily on market structure. Investors have grown increasingly defensive following a rapid shift in macroeconomic expectations triggered by US President Donald Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve chair. Warsh, known for his hawkish monetary stance and emphasis on a smaller Fed balance sheet, has revived fears of a prolonged period of tight liquidity. This policy pivot crushed hopes for interest rate cuts in the near term, boosting the US dollar and pressuring Bitcoin into deeper correction territory. As safe-haven demand surged, capital flowed into US Treasuries, gold, and silver, while Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative fell apart. Gold jumped to fresh highs on renewed Middle East tensions. Adding to the rout, leveraged positioning in the crypto market accelerated the drawdown. More than $5.4 billion in leveraged long positions were liquidated over the past 72 hours, with nearly $214 million flushed from Bitcoin trades alone in the last day. This liquidation spiral amplified the downside pressure, turning what was a controlled pullback into a sharp capitulation. Institutional flows have also dried up. Spot Bitcoin ETFs, once a key driver of bullish sentiment, have recorded over $1.5 billion in outflows over the past week and $6 billion in redemptions since November. As risk-off sentiment intensifies, these vehicles have failed to attract sustained interest from traditional finance players. Market participants are now bracing for US labour market data due later this week. Jobless claims and the non-farm payrolls report will offer fresh clues on whether the Fed’s hand may be forced toward a more dovish stance. Until then, Bitcoin is expected to remain caught in the crossfire of hawkish policy signals, geopolitical friction, and collapsing demand. Will Bitcoin price go up? In terms of technicals, Bitcoin breached its 100-week simple moving average that has historically preceded deeper market corrections. (See below.) BitBull @AkaBull_ · Follow Every time Bitcoin has lost 100W EMA, it has retested the 200W EMA.Right now, 200W EMA is at $68,000 and this will most likely be retested.Once the retest happens, you could start accumulating for the long-term. 5:01 pm · 4 Feb 2026 64 Reply Copy link Read 61 replies The next critical level sits near the 200-week exponential moving average at around $68,000, with some analysts warning of potential downside toward $60,000 or lower if that threshold gives way. According to market analyst Altcoin Sherpa, that remains a possibility based on current circumstances. Altcoin Sherpa @AltcoinSherpa · Follow on 1 hand it makes sense for $BTC to tap the 200W EMA, an indicator that hasn’t been touched since 2023. This would be around 68k. On the other, this is still an interesting level as the 2025 low. Either way, the bottom is closer than we think imo 5:36 pm · 4 Feb 2026 87 Reply Copy link Read 23 replies Bitcoin is also close to confirming a bearish head and shoulder pattern on the 4-hour chart as observed by trader and analyst Sam Price. “It looks like today will end red,” Price wrote while projecting a downside target around $69,300. BTC/USD 4-hour price chart. Source: Sam Price on X. To avoid further downside, Bitcoin must reclaim $76,000 with conviction, as noted by some analysts. According to analyst Jelle, it would position Bitcoin for a recovery rally. Bitcoin price chart. Source: Jelle on X. “Rejection from the grey box area will be the final nail in the coffin for a while,” the analyst added. At the time of publication, Bitcoin price was hovering above $74,500, down roughly 3.5% on the day. Altcoins close the day in red The altcoin market endured a period of intense volatility today, briefly sliding below the critical $1 trillion psychological floor. However, a wave of late-session buying during Asian trading hours helped the sector reclaim some ground, pushing the total altcoin market cap back above $1.1 trillion. Market leaders, including Ethereum (ETH), XRP, Solana (SOL), and BNB, posted losses from 3% to 8%. Ethereum, in particular, touched an 11-month low near $2,100 before stabilising. The top gainers for the day, ATOM, WLFI, XMR, held gains between 1-3%. See below. Source: CoinMarketCap. The post Bitcoin price remains stuck below $74K: why analysts see slide towards $60K appeared first on Invezz

4 Feb 2026, 16:35

Bitcoin Bailout Blocked: US Treasury Secretary Confirms No Authority for Cryptocurrency Intervention

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Bailout Blocked: US Treasury Secretary Confirms No Authority for Cryptocurrency Intervention WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a definitive statement that clarifies the boundaries of federal financial intervention, U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent has confirmed the department possesses no legal authority to execute a Bitcoin bailout. This declaration, made during a congressional hearing on March 15, 2025, directly addresses growing public speculation about government support for the volatile cryptocurrency market. Consequently, the statement reinforces a fundamental separation between traditional fiscal policy and the decentralized digital asset ecosystem. Bitcoin Bailout Authority Formally Denied by Treasury Secretary Bessent delivered the crucial clarification in response to pointed questioning from Senator Sherman. The senator specifically inquired whether the Treasury could leverage taxpayer funds to stabilize or support the Bitcoin market during a period of significant downturn. Immediately, Bessent stated the department lacks the statutory authorization for such an action. This response, first reported by Walter Bloomberg, establishes a clear legal precedent. Therefore, it extinguishes any notion that federal resources could be used to purchase cryptocurrencies directly. This position stems from the Treasury’s enabling legislation and congressional mandates, which strictly define its operational purview. Historically, the department’s emergency tools, such as the Exchange Stabilization Fund, have been designed for traditional currency and sovereign debt markets. Experts note that extending these powers to Bitcoin would require explicit new legislation from Congress. For this reason, the current legal framework provides no pathway for a cryptocurrency bailout using public money. Context and Implications for Cryptocurrency Regulation The Treasury’s statement arrives amid a complex global regulatory landscape for digital assets. Over the past decade, governments worldwide have grappled with how to classify and oversee cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. In the United States, regulatory responsibility is fragmented across several agencies: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees securities offerings. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulates derivatives markets. The Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) focuses on anti-money laundering. This multi-agency approach has created jurisdictional gray areas. However, the question of using taxpayer money for market intervention has remained largely theoretical until now. Secretary Bessent’s testimony provides an unambiguous answer, effectively drawing a bright red line around the use of public funds. This clarification is significant for market participants who must now price assets without the expectation of a federal safety net. Expert Analysis on Market Structure and Precedent Financial law scholars emphasize that this stance aligns with core principles of market discipline. “The Treasury’s position reinforces that Bitcoin operates in a free-market paradigm,” explains Dr. Anya Sharma, a professor of financial regulation at Georgetown University. “Unlike systemically important banks or government-sponsored enterprises, cryptocurrencies were designed to function outside traditional state support mechanisms. A bailout would contradict their foundational ethos.” Furthermore, historical precedent supports this hands-off approach. During the 2008 financial crisis, Congress authorized the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) through specific emergency legislation. That program targeted institutions deemed “too big to fail” to prevent systemic economic collapse. No similar consensus or legal framework exists for digital assets. The table below contrasts the two scenarios: Factor 2008 Bank Bailouts (TARP) Potential Bitcoin Bailout Legal Authority Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 No existing statutory authority Target Systemically critical financial institutions Decentralized digital asset network Funding Source Congressional appropriation Taxpayer money (not authorized) Policy Goal Prevent broad economic contagion Stabilize a specific asset price This comparison highlights the substantial legal and philosophical hurdles. Consequently, market analysts believe this clarity may reduce speculative “moral hazard” where investors take excessive risks expecting government rescue. The Road Ahead for Digital Asset Policy While closing the door on bailouts, the Treasury’s statement does not preclude other forms of regulatory engagement. The department continues to actively shape policy through its role in the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets. Key ongoing initiatives include: Developing frameworks for stablecoin oversight. Enhancing anti-money laundering compliance for crypto firms. Coordinating international regulatory standards through the Financial Stability Board. These efforts focus on mitigating systemic risk and protecting consumers, not on market price support. Meanwhile, legislative proposals for a comprehensive digital asset framework remain under debate in Congress. Any future law could theoretically grant new powers, but current political sentiment shows little appetite for creating a cryptocurrency bailout mechanism. Therefore, the status quo of no federal intervention is likely to persist. Global Reactions and Investor Sentiment International regulators have largely welcomed the U.S. position, viewing it as a commitment to market integrity. A spokesperson for the European Central Bank noted that similar constraints exist within the EU’s treaty frameworks. In contrast, some cryptocurrency advocates argue the clarification is a positive development. “True decentralization means no central backstop,” stated Marcus Chen, founder of a digital asset investment fund. “This affirms Bitcoin’s value proposition as a sovereign, non-state asset. Investors must understand the risks fully.” Market data following the announcement showed increased volatility, reflecting a recalibration of risk assumptions. However, long-term price trends appear unaffected, suggesting most sophisticated investors never priced in a likely government rescue. This reaction underscores the market’s maturation and growing understanding of its distinct regulatory environment. Conclusion U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent’s confirmation that the department has no authority to execute a Bitcoin bailout establishes a critical boundary in federal financial policy. This statement protects taxpayer funds and reinforces the principle that cryptocurrencies operate outside traditional government safety nets. The declaration provides essential clarity for regulators, investors, and market participants navigating the evolving digital asset landscape. Ultimately, it underscores that in the realm of Bitcoin and similar cryptocurrencies, market forces, not federal intervention, will determine outcomes. FAQs Q1: What exactly did the U.S. Treasury Secretary say about a Bitcoin bailout? Secretary Bessent stated, in response to a question from Senator Sherman, that the U.S. Treasury Department is not authorized to purchase cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin, with taxpayer money. This means there is no legal mechanism for a federal bailout of the Bitcoin market. Q2: Could another U.S. government agency bail out Bitcoin? No other federal agency possesses the authority or budgetary capacity to bail out a decentralized cryptocurrency market. The Federal Reserve’s mandate covers monetary policy and traditional financial institutions, not direct asset purchases like Bitcoin. Q3: Has the U.S. government ever bailed out a cryptocurrency or related company? No. While regulatory actions have targeted specific firms for compliance failures, there is no precedent for the U.S. government using public funds to rescue a cryptocurrency, exchange, or related entity in the manner of the 2008 bank bailouts. Q4: Does this mean Bitcoin is riskier than traditional investments? It confirms that Bitcoin lacks the implicit or explicit government backstops that exist for certain traditional financial sectors (like insured bank deposits). This different risk profile means investors bear full responsibility for potential losses, emphasizing the need for thorough due diligence. Q5: Could Congress pass a law in the future to allow a cryptocurrency bailout? Technically, yes, Congress could pass new legislation. However, such a move would face significant political, economic, and philosophical opposition. Current legislative trends focus on consumer protection and anti-money laundering, not creating rescue mechanisms for digital asset markets. This post Bitcoin Bailout Blocked: US Treasury Secretary Confirms No Authority for Cryptocurrency Intervention first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

4 Feb 2026, 16:25

Bitcoin Treasury Purchase: Republican Lawmakers Boldly Push for Historic US Gold Reserve Diversification

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Treasury Purchase: Republican Lawmakers Boldly Push for Historic US Gold Reserve Diversification WASHINGTON, D.C. – March 2025: Republican lawmakers have launched a bold initiative urging the Treasury Department to purchase Bitcoin, marking a significant development in the ongoing debate about America’s strategic reserves. Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming has specifically proposed using a portion of the nation’s gold reserves to acquire the cryptocurrency, according to reporting by Walter Bloomberg. This proposal represents the most direct legislative effort yet to incorporate digital assets into the United States’ official reserve strategy. Bitcoin Treasury Purchase Proposal Gains Momentum Several Republican legislators have formally advocated for Treasury Department Bitcoin acquisitions. Senator Lummis, a well-known cryptocurrency advocate, has taken the lead in this initiative. She previously suggested similar measures last year, but the current proposal carries more weight due to increased bipartisan interest in digital asset policy. The Treasury Department currently manages approximately $11 billion in gold reserves, stored primarily at Fort Knox and other secure locations. This proposal emerges during a period of significant global central bank activity regarding digital assets. Notably, the Federal Reserve has maintained a cautious stance toward cryptocurrency adoption for official purposes. However, other nations have begun exploring similar strategies. For instance, El Salvador made Bitcoin legal tender in 2021, while several European central banks have conducted digital currency experiments. Historical Context of Reserve Asset Management The United States has historically maintained gold as a primary reserve asset since the early 20th century. The Gold Reserve Act of 1934 formally established federal control over monetary gold. Today, the Treasury Department manages these assets through the Exchange Stabilization Fund. Proponents of the Bitcoin purchase argue that digital assets represent a natural evolution of reserve management. Senator Lummis has consistently advocated for clearer cryptocurrency regulations throughout her legislative career. She co-sponsored the Responsible Financial Innovation Act in 2022, which sought to establish comprehensive digital asset frameworks. Her current proposal specifically suggests allocating a small percentage of gold reserves to Bitcoin, potentially creating a diversified reserve portfolio. Expert Perspectives on Reserve Diversification Financial analysts have offered varying assessments of the proposal’s potential impacts. Dr. Michael Carter, a monetary policy researcher at Stanford University, notes that “central banks worldwide are reevaluating reserve compositions in response to digital asset growth.” He emphasizes that any allocation would likely begin cautiously, perhaps with 1-2% of total reserves initially. Conversely, traditional economists express concerns about volatility and security considerations. The Bitcoin market has experienced significant price fluctuations historically, though proponents argue that long-term trends show appreciation. Security protocols for storing digital assets at the federal level would require substantial infrastructure development, according to cybersecurity experts consulted for this analysis. The following table compares traditional and proposed reserve assets: Asset Type Current US Holdings Proposed Addition Key Considerations Gold Reserves ~261.5 million ounces Potential reduction Physical storage, historical stability Bitcoin None officially Potential acquisition Digital storage, price volatility Foreign Currency Various currencies No change proposed Liquidity, exchange rates Political and Economic Implications The proposal has generated significant discussion within political circles. Republican supporters argue that early Bitcoin adoption could provide several advantages: Strategic positioning in emerging digital asset markets Portfolio diversification beyond traditional assets Technological innovation signaling to financial markets Hedge potential against currency devaluation concerns Democratic responses have been more measured, with several legislators emphasizing the need for comprehensive regulatory frameworks first. Treasury Secretary Becent has not issued an official statement regarding the proposal, though department officials have acknowledged receiving the recommendations. The Treasury Department’s approach to digital assets has evolved gradually, with increased monitoring of cryptocurrency markets in recent years. Market analysts observe that even discussion of such proposals can influence cryptocurrency valuations. Bitcoin prices have shown sensitivity to regulatory developments historically. However, the direct impact of this specific proposal remains uncertain pending further legislative action. The proposal would require multiple approval stages before implementation, including congressional authorization and executive branch coordination. Implementation Challenges and Considerations Several practical challenges would accompany any Treasury Department Bitcoin acquisition. Storage security represents a primary concern, as digital assets require sophisticated cybersecurity measures. The government would need to develop or contract secure custody solutions, potentially involving multiple verification layers and geographic distribution of keys. Valuation methodology presents another consideration. Unlike gold, which has established pricing mechanisms, Bitcoin valuation involves greater volatility. Accounting standards for digital asset holdings would require development, as current government accounting practices don’t adequately address cryptocurrency assets. Additionally, liquidation procedures for potential future sales would need establishment to ensure market stability during transactions. Global Precedents and Comparisons Several nations have explored official cryptocurrency holdings, providing potential models for US consideration. El Salvador’s Bitcoin adoption, while controversial, offers operational insights regarding public sector digital asset management. The country has implemented both citizen accessibility programs and treasury holding strategies since 2021. Other approaches include China’s digital yuan development and various European central bank digital currency experiments. However, direct Bitcoin acquisition by major reserve managers remains limited. This makes the US proposal particularly noteworthy within international financial circles. Analysts suggest that American adoption could influence other G7 nations to reconsider their digital asset reserve policies. The International Monetary Fund has issued guidance regarding cryptocurrency reserve management, emphasizing risk assessment frameworks. Their recommendations include thorough volatility analysis and security protocol development before any significant allocations. These guidelines likely inform Treasury Department deliberations regarding the Republican proposal. Conclusion The Bitcoin Treasury purchase proposal represents a significant moment in digital asset policy development. Republican lawmakers, led by Senator Cynthia Lummis, have advanced concrete suggestions for incorporating cryptocurrency into US reserve strategy. This initiative reflects broader trends toward digital asset integration within traditional financial systems. While implementation faces substantial hurdles, the proposal has stimulated important discussions about reserve management evolution. The Treasury Department’s response will likely influence both domestic policy and international financial practices regarding digital assets. FAQs Q1: What exactly are Republican lawmakers proposing regarding Bitcoin? Republican legislators, particularly Senator Cynthia Lummis, propose that the Treasury Department use a portion of US gold reserves to purchase Bitcoin as part of the nation’s official reserves. Q2: How much Bitcoin would the Treasury potentially acquire? The proposal doesn’t specify exact amounts, but financial experts suggest any initial allocation would likely represent 1-2% of total reserves, potentially amounting to several billion dollars worth of Bitcoin. Q3: Has the Treasury Department responded to this proposal? As of March 2025, Treasury Secretary Becent hasn’t issued an official statement, though department officials acknowledge receiving the recommendations and are reviewing them through standard channels. Q4: What are the main arguments against this Bitcoin purchase proposal? Opponents cite Bitcoin’s price volatility, security concerns regarding digital asset storage, regulatory uncertainties, and potential market manipulation risks as primary objections to Treasury Department acquisition. Q5: Have other countries implemented similar Bitcoin reserve strategies? El Salvador has made Bitcoin legal tender and holds some in treasury reserves, but no major economic power has yet allocated significant portions of national reserves to cryptocurrency assets. This post Bitcoin Treasury Purchase: Republican Lawmakers Boldly Push for Historic US Gold Reserve Diversification first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

4 Feb 2026, 16:15

Bitcoin Bear Market: Why a Devastating 80% Crash Now Seems Unlikely, Analyst Reveals

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Bear Market: Why a Devastating 80% Crash Now Seems Unlikely, Analyst Reveals In a significant shift from historical patterns, a leading crypto analyst now argues that a devastating 80% Bitcoin bear market crash, once a hallmark of previous cycles, is improbable in the current financial landscape. Vetle Lunde, Head of Research at the analytics firm K33, presented this compelling analysis on May 15, 2025, challenging long-held beliefs about cryptocurrency market cycles. His assessment hinges on a transformed ecosystem where institutional capital and macroeconomic policy play unprecedented roles. Bitcoin Bear Market Dynamics Have Fundamentally Changed Vetle Lunde’s analysis directly confronts the crypto community’s entrenched four-year cycle narrative. Historically, Bitcoin has experienced brutal drawdowns after major bull runs. For instance, the 2017-2018 cycle saw a decline of over 80% from its peak. Similarly, the 2021-2022 bear market resulted in a drop of approximately 77%. However, Lunde posits that these historical precedents are no longer reliable guides. The market’s structure has evolved beyond recognition, primarily due to three critical factors. Firstly, institutional investment has provided a massive influx of sticky capital. Major asset managers, publicly traded companies, and pension funds now hold Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset. This capital behaves differently from the retail-driven flows of past cycles. Secondly, the proliferation of regulated financial products , like spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States and Europe, has created formal, accessible pathways for traditional finance. These vehicles lock in demand and reduce volatility from speculative trading. Finally, the anticipated environment of interest rate cuts by central banks creates a favorable macro backdrop for hard assets like Bitcoin, contrasting sharply with the high-rate environment that exacerbated the 2022 crash. Bear Market Period Peak Price Trough Price Approximate Decline 2013-2015 $1,163 $152 87% 2017-2018 $19,783 $3,152 84% 2021-2022 $69,000 $15,476 77% Analyzing the New Support Structure for BTC Price While a catastrophic 80% drop appears off the table, Lunde’s research does not suggest an absence of volatility or correction risk. His technical analysis identifies specific, critical support levels that market participants should monitor. The primary level of interest is $74,000 , which represents a key psychological and technical barrier consolidated during the 2024 rally. A sustained break below this level, according to Lunde, could trigger accelerated selling pressure. Subsequently, the analysis points to two major zones where buying interest could resurge. The first is the area around $69,000 , which coincides with the November 2021 all-time high. In market technicals, previous resistance often turns into future support. The second and more significant level is the 200-week moving average , currently hovering near $58,000. This long-term trend indicator has acted as a ultimate floor in every major Bitcoin bear market, including the 2018 and 2022 bottoms. A test of this moving average would represent a deep correction of roughly 50% from recent highs, aligning with Lunde’s view of a tempered, not catastrophic, bear scenario. The Institutionalization Thesis and Its Impact The core of Lunde’s argument rests on the irreversible institutionalization of Bitcoin . This process introduces a new class of holders with longer time horizons and different risk parameters. For example, corporate treasury holdings are unlikely to be sold during short-term price fluctuations. Furthermore, spot Bitcoin ETFs create a constant, rules-based buying pressure as financial advisors allocate client portfolios. This structural demand acts as a buffer against panic selling. Consequently, the market now has a more diversified and resilient base, reducing the likelihood of a liquidity crisis severe enough to cause an 80% collapse. Additionally, the regulatory clarity emerging in major jurisdictions reduces existential risk premiums. When governments provide frameworks for custody, trading, and taxation, it lowers the uncertainty that historically fueled extreme sell-offs. This maturation process, while not eliminating cycles, fundamentally alters their amplitude. The market is transitioning from a speculative asset to a recognized financial instrument, and its price action is beginning to reflect that new identity. Conclusion Vetle Lunde’s analysis presents a nuanced outlook for the current Bitcoin bear market, suggesting that while corrections are inevitable, the era of apocalyptic 80% drawdowns may be over. The convergence of institutional capital, regulated products, and shifting monetary policy has created a more stable foundation for the flagship cryptocurrency. Investors should now monitor key technical levels like $74,000 and the 200-week moving average, understanding that the market’s risk profile has permanently evolved. This does not guarantee perpetual gains, but it strongly indicates that the extreme volatility of Bitcoin’s adolescence is giving way to the more measured movements of its maturity. FAQs Q1: What is the main reason an 80% Bitcoin crash is now considered unlikely? The primary reason is the massive influx of institutional investment and the launch of regulated spot Bitcoin ETFs, which provide a stable, long-term demand base that reduces extreme volatility and panic selling. Q2: What does Vetle Lunde say about Bitcoin’s traditional four-year cycle? Lunde states that the classic four-year cycle model, which predicted severe bear markets, is “no longer valid” due to the fundamental changes in the cryptocurrency market’s structure and participant base. Q3: What are the key support levels to watch if Bitcoin’s price declines further? The key levels are $74,000 (immediate support), followed by the November 2021 high near $69,000, and the critical 200-week moving average, which is currently around $58,000. Q4: How does interest rate policy affect Bitcoin’s price according to this analysis? An environment of interest rate cuts by central banks is seen as favorable for Bitcoin. Lower rates reduce the appeal of yield-bearing traditional assets and can increase investment in alternative stores of value like Bitcoin. Q5: Does this analysis mean Bitcoin won’t experience any significant price drops? No, the analysis does not rule out significant corrections. It specifically argues against a repeat of the historical 80% crashes. A drop to the 200-week moving average near $58,000 would still constitute a major correction of approximately 50% from recent peaks. This post Bitcoin Bear Market: Why a Devastating 80% Crash Now Seems Unlikely, Analyst Reveals first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

4 Feb 2026, 16:03

$12 Trillion Giant Vanguard Boosts Bitcoin Treasury Position: Details

Vanguard Group, the $12 trillion indexing powerhouse, has increased its stake in Strive ($ASST) to 27.63 million shares.