hodler

26 Jan 2026, 18:28

Carry trades in emerging markets up in 2026, as currencies hit multi-year highs

People who moved their money from the dollar into emerging market currencies are seeing strong profits at the start of 2026, and financial experts at major banks think this winning streak will keep going after last year’s impressive gains. These investment approaches, known as carry trades, have already climbed 1.3% in 2026. A Bloomberg index that tracks returns from eight emerging markets shows these strategies are continuing their momentum from 2023, when they jumped 18%, the best performance since 2009. Carry trades work by buying currencies from countries with high interest rates using borrowed money from countries where borrowing costs are cheaper. On Monday, the Bloomberg index stood above 291, coming within 5% of the record set back in 2011. Currencies ranging from South Africa’s rand to Colombia’s peso are trading at their highest levels in years. Analysts at Morgan Stanley, Bank of America Corp., and Citigroup Inc. all expect these gains to continue building. Beyond just currency values going up, these strategies are also making money because real interest rates remain high across the developing world. High interest rates drive strategy success Central banks in many emerging countries are only slowly cutting interest rates, even though inflation numbers show prices are rising more slowly. “For carry trades, we are looking at countries where monetary policy is tight and central banks are considered credible,” said James Lord, who leads emerging market strategy at Morgan Stanley. He pointed to Brazil’s real, Turkey’s lira, and the Czech koruna as his top picks for 2026. Latin American currencies are doing particularly well. Brazil’s real has already delivered returns of 4.3% so far this year, adding to last year’s gain of 23.5%. The country keeps interest rates at 15% even though inflation has moved closer to what the central bank wants. Citi strategists are also suggesting investors buy the real against the dollar, along with the Turkish lira. However, not all emerging currencies are succeeding. As reported by Cryptopolitan previously, India’s rupee, which was the worst performer last year, continues to lose ground with a drop of about 2% in carry trade terms this year. Indonesia’s rupiah has also caused losses for investors. The Bloomberg index shows the record year for carry strategies was 2003, with a 25% return. For investors to see similar big gains this time, the dollar needs to keep weakening, and emerging currency swings must stay small. Traders are watching JPMorgan Chase & Co’s volatility gauge closely, which hit a three-week high recently after a long period of calm. President Donald Trump’s policies are playing a major role in pushing down the dollar’s value. Recently, Trump threatened to impose 10% tariffs on European countries in a dispute over Greenland, which rattled markets and added to concerns about the dollar. Financial markets see this as increasing political risk around the US currency. Dollar’s reserve currency status under question There are also growing worries about the dollar’s position as the world’s main reserve currency. With US policy becoming less predictable, European Union countries that hold $8 trillion in US assets may have leverage in trade disputes. Trump’s tariffs represent the biggest US tax increase since 1993 , equal to 0.55% of the country’s economic output, according to analysts. Fears of a wider trade war are building as these policies take shape. Bank of America strategist Alex Cohen thinks carry trades will keep doing well, but only if market volatility stays low. “That’s a big ‘if’ as we sit here today,” Cohen said, pointing to possible conflicts around the world that could shake things up. Despite these risks, the current environment of high emerging market interest rates combined with dollar weakness continues to favor investors willing to take on emerging market currencies. Whether this trend can match the historic returns of 2003 remains uncertain, but major banks are betting the conditions are in place for continued gains throughout 2026. Emerging markets have shown surprising strength against expectations that trade tensions would hurt them most. With central banks in developing countries maintaining credibility and keeping tight monetary policy, the fundamentals appear solid for now. However, any sudden spike in volatility or major geopolitical event could quickly reverse these gains. The success of carry trades in 2026 will depend on whether the current calm in currency markets can hold, and whether Trump’s unpredictable policy moves continue to weaken the dollar without triggering a broader financial crisis. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

26 Jan 2026, 18:25

Tether’s Monumental Gold Purchase: 27 Tons Secured in Q4 2025 Reshapes Stablecoin Strategy

BitcoinWorld Tether’s Monumental Gold Purchase: 27 Tons Secured in Q4 2025 Reshapes Stablecoin Strategy In a landmark move for digital finance, stablecoin giant Tether Holdings Ltd. executed a monumental 27-ton gold acquisition during the fourth quarter of 2025, fundamentally altering the composition of its USDT reserve assets. This strategic purchase, first reported by Unfolded and valued at approximately $4.4 billion based on prevailing market prices, represents one of the largest single-quarter gold acquisitions by a private financial entity in recent history. Consequently, this action signals a profound shift in how major players in the cryptocurrency sector approach asset backing and long-term stability. The transaction underscores a growing convergence between traditional safe-haven assets and the digital economy, potentially setting a new benchmark for reserve management. Tether’s Gold Purchase: A Deep Dive into the $4.4 Billion Transaction Tether’s acquisition of 27 metric tons of gold is a transaction of staggering scale. To provide context, 27 tons equates to roughly 868,000 troy ounces. For comparison, the global gold market produced approximately 3,100 tons in 2024, making Tether’s purchase equivalent to nearly 0.9% of a full year’s global mine production. The company likely sourced this gold through a consortium of bullion banks and accredited refiners, adhering to the highest standards of provenance and chain-of-custody documentation. This process ensures the gold meets the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) Good Delivery standards, a critical requirement for large-scale institutional holdings. Furthermore, the timing of this purchase in Q4 2025 is particularly significant. Historically, this period often sees heightened volatility in both traditional and digital asset markets. By allocating a substantial portion of its reserves to gold during this window, Tether demonstrates a strategic preference for an asset with a millennia-long reputation as a store of value. The $4.4 billion valuation is based on a spot price range, indicating the purchase likely occurred through a series of transactions or a structured deal to minimize market impact. This methodical approach highlights the operational sophistication now required for multi-billion dollar moves within the crypto-financial ecosystem. The Strategic Rationale Behind Tether’s Massive Gold Acquisition Tether’s decision to allocate billions to physical gold is not an isolated event but a calculated strategic pivot. Primarily, it serves to further diversify the USDT stablecoin’s reserve composition. For years, Tether’s reserves have been predominantly held in U.S. Treasury bills, cash, and other cash-equivalents. The addition of a substantial physical gold position introduces a non-correlated, tangible asset that acts as a hedge against systemic financial risk and currency devaluation. In essence, gold provides a foundational layer of security that is geographically and politically neutral. Moreover, this move directly addresses ongoing demands from regulators and the user community for greater transparency and ultra-conservative asset backing. Gold is universally recognized, easily auditable, and cannot be digitally created or inflated, which strengthens the perceived trustworthiness of each USDT token in circulation. From a market psychology perspective, anchoring a digital currency to a physical, timeless asset like gold bridges the gap between innovative fintech and traditional wealth preservation. It signals that stablecoins are maturing into hybrid instruments that leverage the efficiency of blockchain while embracing the stability of proven historical assets. Expert Analysis: Implications for the Broader Cryptocurrency Market Financial analysts and blockchain economists view Tether’s gold purchase as a watershed moment. “This is a clear signal that major stablecoin issuers are moving beyond short-term debt instruments and building fortress balance sheets,” notes Dr. Anya Sharma, a leading fintech economist. “By allocating to gold, Tether is not just hedging; it is constructing a permanent, value-agnostic backbone for its digital currency system.” This action could potentially trigger a reassessment of reserve strategies across the entire stablecoin sector, with competitors possibly feeling pressure to bolster their own holdings with tangible assets. The immediate market impact was observable in both the gold and cryptocurrency markets. Gold prices received a notable institutional bid, while the news contributed to a strengthening of confidence in the broader stablecoin market. Importantly, this purchase may influence how central banks and traditional financial institutions perceive the asset-backing models of leading crypto entities. A direct comparison illustrates the scale: Entity / Fund Approximate Gold Holdings (2025) Context Tether Holdings Ltd. 27 tons (new acquisition) Backing for USDT stablecoin SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) ETF ~900 tons World’s largest gold-backed ETF National Bank of Poland ~360 tons Central bank reserves This table shows that while Tether’s holding is a fraction of a major ETF’s, it instantly positions the company as a significant holder of physical gold, on par with many mid-sized national banks or large hedge funds. The long-term effect could be a gradual ‘goldification’ of crypto reserves, making the digital asset ecosystem more resilient to black swan events in traditional finance. Historical Context and the Evolution of Stablecoin Reserves Tether’s journey with its reserve composition has been dynamic and highly scrutinized. In its early years, USDT was controversially backed primarily by commercial paper. Following regulatory settlements and a push for transparency, the company executed a dramatic shift towards U.S. Treasuries, which now constitute the majority of its reserves. The Q4 2025 gold purchase marks the next logical phase in this evolution: the integration of a premier physical hard asset. This progression mirrors a broader trend in finance where diversification into real assets becomes paramount during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty. Factors such as persistent inflation, geopolitical tensions, and high sovereign debt levels in major economies have renewed institutional interest in gold. Tether, by acting on this trend, demonstrates that its treasury management strategy is aligned with that of the world’s most conservative asset managers. It also provides a tangible answer to critics who question the long-term stability of purely fiat-backed digital currencies. Operational and Security Considerations for Storing 27 Tons of Gold Sourcing the gold is only the first step; securing it presents a formidable logistical challenge. Tether likely employs a multi-jurisdictional, professional vaulting strategy. Industry standards for such holdings involve: Allocated Storage: Each specific bar is owned by Tether and held separately from the vault operator’s assets. High-Security Vaults: Facilities often located in financial hubs like Switzerland, Singapore, or London, with military-grade protection. Independent Audits: Regular, surprise inspections by firms like Inspectorate International to verify weight, purity, and serial numbers. Insurance: Comprehensive global insurance policies to cover against all physical risks. The cost of this storage and insurance is factored into Tether’s operational expenses. However, the company views this as a necessary cost for achieving the highest level of trust and resilience. This physical infrastructure, paradoxically, strengthens the purely digital promise of USDT—every token is backed by assets that exist in the real world, under guard, and subject to verification. Conclusion Tether’s purchase of 27 tons of gold in Q4 2025 is far more than a simple treasury transaction; it is a strategic declaration. This move significantly diversifies the USDT stablecoin’s reserve base, introduces a powerful hedge against financial instability, and raises the bar for transparency and security in the digital asset industry. By anchoring a portion of its value to physical gold, Tether bridges millennia of monetary history with the frontier of fintech, potentially ushering in a new era where stablecoins are backed by the most resilient assets known to humanity. The repercussions of this $4.4 billion gold purchase will likely influence reserve management strategies across cryptocurrency and traditional finance for years to come. FAQs Q1: Why did Tether buy physical gold instead of a gold ETF? Tether likely chose physical, allocated gold for direct ownership and absence of counterparty risk. An ETF represents a financial claim on gold, while physical bars provide unambiguous, auditable asset backing, which is crucial for stablecoin reserve credibility. Q2: How does this purchase affect the stability of USDT? In theory, it enhances stability by adding a non-correlated, historically stable asset to the reserves. Gold is less susceptible to inflation or default risk compared to some financial instruments, potentially making USDT more resilient during market crises. Q3: Where is Tether’s 27 tons of gold stored? While specific locations are confidential for security reasons, standard practice involves using high-security, insured vaults operated by professional custodians in major global financial centers like Switzerland, Singapore, or the United Kingdom. Q4: Will Tether buy more gold in the future? Tether has not issued formal guidance on future purchases. However, this large acquisition establishes a precedent. Further buys are possible if the company’s strategy continues to emphasize diversification into hard assets. Q5: Does this mean each USDT is now backed by gold? No. Gold now becomes a component of the larger reserve portfolio. Each USDT remains backed by a reserve containing U.S. Treasuries, cash, cash equivalents, and now physical gold. The latest quarterly attestation will detail the exact percentage allocation. This post Tether’s Monumental Gold Purchase: 27 Tons Secured in Q4 2025 Reshapes Stablecoin Strategy first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

26 Jan 2026, 17:50

Bitcoin Price Defies Logic: Why a Weaker Dollar Fails to Spark Rally in 2025’s Fearful Market

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Defies Logic: Why a Weaker Dollar Fails to Spark Rally in 2025’s Fearful Market In a surprising twist for global markets in early 2025, the Bitcoin price remains stubbornly subdued despite a notable decline in the US Dollar Index (DXY). This counterintuitive dynamic challenges a long-held market axiom and underscores a profound shift in investor psychology, according to a detailed on-chain analysis. Traditionally, cryptocurrency investors have viewed dollar weakness as a direct tailwind for digital assets. However, current conditions reveal a more complex relationship where macroeconomic fear overrides conventional catalysts. Bitcoin Price and the Broken Dollar Correlation The inverse correlation between the US dollar and Bitcoin has formed a cornerstone of crypto market analysis for years. Historically, a falling dollar often signals easier global financial conditions, potentially driving capital toward alternative, non-fiat stores of value. Consequently, analysts frequently cite dollar weakness as a bullish signal for cryptocurrencies. Recent data, however, paints a different picture. The DXY has retreated from recent highs, yet the Bitcoin price continues to trade within a tight, fearful range, lacking upward momentum. This decoupling prompts a critical re-examination of the underlying drivers for crypto asset valuation. GugaOnChain, a noted CryptoQuant contributor and on-chain analyst, provides crucial context for this anomaly. The analyst’s research, reported by CryptoPotato, indicates that a weaker dollar alone is an insufficient catalyst. Instead, it must coincide with specific macroeconomic conditions to fuel a sustainable Bitcoin rally. These conditions primarily include persistent high inflation and abundant systemic liquidity. In such an environment, investors actively seek inflation hedges outside the traditional financial system. Currently, neither condition is fully met, leaving the typical transmission mechanism between dollar value and crypto prices effectively broken. Macroeconomic Fear Drives a Flight to Safety The dominant theme in 2025’s first quarter is a potent risk-off sentiment sweeping across global financial markets. Several factors contribute to this climate of caution. Geopolitical tensions continue to simmer, central banks maintain a restrictive stance compared to the zero-rate era, and concerns about economic growth linger. In this environment, fear governs asset allocation decisions. Investors demonstrate a clear preference for capital preservation over aggressive growth speculation. This psychology directly impacts the Bitcoin price, as the asset’s perceived volatility conflicts with the desire for stability. When fear dominates, capital flows toward assets with centuries of established trust. Gold, the quintessential safe haven, has notably outperformed Bitcoin during recent periods of dollar weakness. This trend highlights a critical distinction in investor perception. Despite being labeled “digital gold” by proponents, Bitcoin has not yet universally achieved that status during systemic stress. The analyst emphasizes that during crises of confidence and extreme risk aversion—scenarios that can also weaken the dollar—cryptocurrencies often decline in tandem with risk assets like stocks. This correlation with equities, rather than decoupling as a true safe haven, currently exerts more influence on the Bitcoin price than dollar movements. The Crucial Role of Liquidity and Inflation To understand the missing link, one must analyze the liquidity landscape. The period of rampant quantitative easing (QE) post-2020 created a massive pool of cheap capital that flowed into various risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. That liquidity tide has receded. Current monetary policy, while not uniformly tight globally, lacks the firehose-like abundance of previous years. Without this excess liquidity sloshing through the system, even a weaker dollar struggles to push significant new capital into the crypto ecosystem. The mechanism is clogged. Similarly, the inflation narrative has evolved. While inflation remains above central bank targets in many economies, the peak fear of hyperinflation or a complete loss of fiat credibility has subsided. This moderation reduces the urgent, panic-driven demand for alternative stores of value. The table below contrasts the historical catalyst environment with current conditions: Macro Factor Historical Rally Catalyst (e.g., 2020-2021) Current Market State (Early 2025) US Dollar Trend Falling Falling Systemic Liquidity Abundant (QE) Restricted / Normalized Inflation Psychology Rising Fear / “Fiat Debasement” Managed Fear / Contained Overall Market Sentiment Risk-On Risk-Off Primary Beneficiary Bitcoin & Risk Assets Gold & Treasuries This comparative analysis clearly shows why the outcome differs despite a similar dollar trend. The surrounding conditions dictate the market’s reaction. Key takeaways for investors include: Context is paramount: Isolated indicators like the DXY provide limited insight. Sentiment dictates flows: Fear overwhelms theoretical correlations. Liquidity is the lifeblood: Without it, price catalysts remain dormant. On-Chain Data and Investor Behavior Beyond macroeconomic theory, on-chain metrics offer a real-time window into investor behavior that explains the stagnant Bitcoin price. Analysis of exchange flows shows neither significant accumulation nor aggressive distribution, indicating a wait-and-see approach. Furthermore, the velocity of Bitcoin—the rate at which it changes hands—remains low. This suggests that existing holders are not transacting actively, and new speculative capital is not entering the network at a scale needed to drive a rally. The market is in a state of equilibrium, biased slightly toward fear. The behavior of long-term holders (LTHs) versus short-term holders (STHs) is particularly telling. LTHs continue to hold steadfast, showing conviction, but they are not providing buying pressure. STHs, typically the source of volatile trading, are inactive or are selling at minimal profits or losses, reflecting the risk-off environment. This stagnation in network activity underscores that a weaker dollar, without accompanying positive sentiment or a compelling macro narrative, fails to trigger the algorithmic and human trading decisions that propel prices upward. Historical Precedents and Market Maturation This is not the first time Bitcoin’s correlation with the dollar has broken down. Similar periods occurred during the 2018 bear market and phases of the 2022 downturn. Each instance coincided with a contraction in global liquidity and a flight to safety. However, the market structure in 2025 is more mature. The presence of institutional players, regulated ETFs, and more sophisticated derivatives means reactions to macro data are more nuanced and less driven by retail speculation alone. This maturation may lead to more frequent periods of decoupling as Bitcoin finds its own equilibrium based on a broader set of factors, including: Adoption metrics and network utility Regulatory developments Institutional custody flows Global accessibility and legal tender status in select nations Conclusion The analysis reveals a critical lesson for 2025: the Bitcoin price does not move in a vacuum based on a single inverse indicator like the US dollar. Its trajectory is a complex function of liquidity, macroeconomic sentiment, and competing safe-haven assets. The current risk-off climate, characterized by fear and a preference for traditional stores of value like gold, has severed the simple weak-dollar-strong-Bitcoin narrative. For a sustained rally to materialize, the market likely requires a shift back to a risk-on mindset, coupled with renewed liquidity or a sharp resurgence in inflation fears. Until then, dollar weakness alone will remain an insufficient catalyst, highlighting the cryptocurrency market’s ongoing integration into and reaction to broader global financial dynamics. FAQs Q1: Why isn’t Bitcoin rising if the US dollar is getting weaker? A1: A weaker dollar typically helps Bitcoin only when combined with high inflation and abundant market liquidity. Currently, widespread risk-off sentiment and fear are driving investors toward traditional safe havens like gold instead, overriding the dollar’s influence. Q2: What does “risk-off sentiment” mean for cryptocurrency? A2: Risk-off sentiment describes a market environment where investors prioritize safety and capital preservation. They sell volatile assets like stocks and cryptocurrencies and move money into perceived stable assets such as government bonds, gold, and stable currencies, leading to downward pressure on the Bitcoin price. Q3: Has the correlation between Bitcoin and the US dollar changed permanently? A3: Not necessarily. Correlations in financial markets are dynamic. The relationship may reassert itself if macroeconomic conditions shift back to a high-liquidity, risk-on environment. The current decoupling shows Bitcoin’s price drivers are multifaceted and context-dependent. Q4: What macroeconomic conditions would help Bitcoin rise alongside a weaker dollar? A4: Key conditions include aggressive monetary easing (creating new liquidity), a sharp rise in inflation expectations that undermines faith in fiat currency, and a general shift in investor psychology from fear to optimism about economic growth and risk assets. Q5: How does gold’s performance relate to Bitcoin’s current price action? A5: Gold’s outperformance during this period of dollar weakness acts as a clear signal of the market’s risk-off preference. Capital is flowing into the established, centuries-old store of value rather than the newer digital alternative, demonstrating that in times of acute fear, perceived stability trumps technological innovation for many investors. This post Bitcoin Price Defies Logic: Why a Weaker Dollar Fails to Spark Rally in 2025’s Fearful Market first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

26 Jan 2026, 17:45

CLARITY Act Ignites Hope: Jefferies Sees Regulatory Turning Point for Mass Tokenization

BitcoinWorld CLARITY Act Ignites Hope: Jefferies Sees Regulatory Turning Point for Mass Tokenization NEW YORK, March 2025 – A pivotal analysis from global investment bank Jefferies frames the proposed U.S. CLARITY Act not merely as another piece of legislation but as a potential catalyst for a fundamental shift in finance. The report suggests this regulatory move could unlock a long-anticipated surge in asset tokenization across traditional financial institutions. This assessment arrives at a critical juncture, as blockchain infrastructure reaches new levels of maturity and the market clamors for definitive rules. The CLARITY Act: A Potential Inflection Point for Tokenization Jefferies’ recent research note, cited by financial news outlets including CoinDesk, places significant weight on the legislative proposal formally known as the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act. The bank’s analysts argue that the act’s primary function—to establish a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins—serves as a foundational step for broader digital asset adoption. Consequently, this regulatory scaffolding could accelerate institutional confidence in tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs). Tokenization, the process of converting rights to an asset into a digital token on a blockchain, promises profound efficiency gains. These gains include near-instant settlement, enhanced liquidity for traditionally illiquid assets, and automated compliance through smart contracts. However, widespread adoption has historically faced a significant barrier: regulatory uncertainty. The CLARITY Act directly addresses a core component of this ecosystem, potentially clearing a major path forward. Building Blocks: Mature Infrastructure Meets Regulatory Momentum The Jefferies report does not view the CLARITY Act in isolation. Instead, it contextualizes the legislation within a broader technological and regulatory trajectory that has been building for years. The analysis highlights two concurrent developments creating a fertile ground for change. First, blockchain infrastructure has demonstrably matured. Enterprise-grade platforms now offer the security, scalability, and interoperability required by large financial institutions. Second, global regulatory bodies are progressively moving from a stance of observation to one of active framework development. This dual progress lays essential groundwork for the tokenization trend Jefferies anticipates. Expert Analysis on Market Structure Definition The Jefferies analysis emphasizes a crucial nuance. While the CLARITY Act focuses on stablecoins, its passage could spur faster action on a more comprehensive U.S. crypto market structure bill. A precise legal definition for digital asset securities, commodities, and payment instruments remains the holy grail for institutional deployment. Clear rules would allow banks, asset managers, and insurers to allocate capital and develop products with defined compliance parameters. Financial technology experts often cite the need for this clarity. They argue that without it, institutions operate in a gray area, limiting innovation to pilot programs and proofs-of-concept. The table below contrasts the current state with the potential post-CLARITY Act environment: Aspect Current Environment Potential Post-CLARITY Environment Stablecoin Issuance Fragmented state-level rules, federal uncertainty Federal chartering options, clear reserve & redemption standards Institutional On-Ramps Complex, bespoke compliance for each bank Standardized custody and transaction rules for regulated entities Tokenization Pilots Limited to private networks, small scale Potential for interoperable public/private networks, larger scale Assessing the Impact on Financial Ecosystems Jefferies projects that the impact of regulatory clarity would ripple across multiple sectors with tangible effects. The report identifies three primary beneficiary groups should the legislative trend solidify. Traditional Financial Institutions: Major banks and asset managers could aggressively develop tokenized offerings for treasury bonds, private equity funds, and trade finance. This would create new revenue streams and improve operational efficiency. Blockchain-Based Companies: Infrastructure providers,合规 technology firms, and security auditors would see demand surge as institutions seek partners to build compliant systems. The Broader Tokenization Industry: Success in financial markets could spur tokenization in adjacent fields like real estate, carbon credits, and intellectual property, creating a more unified digital asset economy. Despite this optimistic outlook, the report acknowledges legislative uncertainty. The passage of the CLARITY Act, or any major market structure bill, involves a complex political process. However, Jefferies suggests that even the serious debate and progression of such legislation can have a market-positive effect, signaling to institutions that the regulatory endpoint is in sight. Conclusion The analysis from Jefferies positions the U.S. CLARITY Act as more than a stablecoin rulebook. It represents a potential keystone in the arch of modern financial infrastructure. By addressing a fundamental layer of the digital asset stack, the act could catalyze a wave of institutional tokenization that leverages now-mature blockchain technology. While its passage is not guaranteed, the very pursuit of such clarity marks a significant step away from ambiguity and toward a structured future for finance. The coming months will be critical in determining whether this potential turning point for tokenization becomes a reality. FAQs Q1: What is the CLARITY Act? The Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act is a proposed U.S. law aimed at creating a federal regulatory framework for issuers of payment stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value relative to a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar. Q2: Why does Jefferies link the CLARITY Act to asset tokenization? Jefferies analysts believe that clear regulation for stablecoins, a key tool for settling tokenized asset transactions, would reduce risk and uncertainty for traditional financial institutions, thereby encouraging them to pursue larger-scale tokenization projects. Q3: What is asset tokenization? Asset tokenization is the process of converting the ownership rights of a physical or financial asset (like real estate, bonds, or art) into a digital token on a blockchain. This can make assets more divisible, easier to transfer, and simpler to track. Q4: What are the main hurdles to institutional tokenization today? The primary hurdles include regulatory uncertainty, concerns over compliance and anti-money laundering rules, technological integration challenges with legacy systems, and questions about the legal enforceability of smart contracts. Q5: Has tokenization been successful anywhere yet? Yes, several successful pilots and limited productions exist. For example, central banks are exploring wholesale central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) for settlements, and financial institutions in Europe and Asia have tokenized government bonds and money market funds on regulated platforms. This post CLARITY Act Ignites Hope: Jefferies Sees Regulatory Turning Point for Mass Tokenization first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

26 Jan 2026, 17:39

Auto industry pressure looms over Germany's economy as new year starts slow

Germany’s economy started the new year without much energy, as a closely watched measure of business confidence held steady in January while the country’s biggest labor union warned it will ramp up fights with major carmakers over cost reductions and job losses. The Ifo Institute in Munich said Monday its business climate reading stayed at 87.6 points this month, unchanged from December and below what economists had predicted. Around 9,000 companies answer the monthly survey. Analysts polled by The Wall Street Journal had expected the number to climb to 88.0. “The German economy is starting the new year with little momentum,” Clemens Fuest, who leads the Ifo Institute, said in a statement. The flat reading comes as IG Metall, Germany’s most powerful autoworker union, said it would increase pressure on companies like Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz if they keep pushing cost cuts and moving work to other countries. The union is getting ready for wage talks in the metal and electrical engineering sector later this year, with tough negotiations expected around autumn. Nadine Boguslawski, the head treasurer at IG Metall who sits on the boards of Mercedes and major parts maker Robert Bosch, spoke Monday at the union’s yearly press meeting. “We are prepared to take a stand against corporate strategies that prioritize profits and then resort to circumventing collective agreements and relocating abroad,” she said. “The driving force behind the economic upturn in 2026 will be employees and their incomes.” The union and carmakers will face off as the industry deals with tougher competition in China and from Chinese companies, the effects of American tariffs , and slower-than-hoped demand for electric cars. Worker representatives hold unusual power at big German companies. They get half the seats on supervisory boards, which lets them shape and even stop major company plans. Germany’s car industry had a rough year marked by warnings about lower profits and restructuring plans. Manufacturers pulled back on electric vehicle programs because fewer people bought them than expected. Companies have announced job cuts that will eliminate close to 100,000 positions by 2030, with Bosch cutting the most. Some cost-cutting shows results Some recent cost-cutting has shown results. Volkswagen said last week it had better-than-expected cash flow from its car business in 2025. Most of that came from putting off investments. Parts supplier ZF Friedrichshafen also reported stronger cash flow after customers canceled several electric car projects. While companies resize their plans, competition from Chinese carmakers like BYD keeps growing both in China, the world’s largest car market, and through cars shipped into Europe. German car production has been stuck at the same level for three straight years, staying well under where it was before the crisis. Production in 2025 was about 11% lower than in 2019. IG Metall says any government help for the industry should benefit workers in Germany. Union chair Christiane Benner said she wants “a clear commitment against relocations, site closures and layoffs — immediately,” according to a statement from the union. The business climate reading stayed flat even though the government rolled out stimulus programs. Confidence had picked up at the start of last year after German officials promised up to around one trillion dollars in spending for the country’s roads, bridges, and military. But that confidence stopped growing after summer when higher American tariffs began affecting businesses, and worries increased about how fast the stimulus money would actually reach companies. “The unchanged Ifo index reflects the uncertainty that has hit the German economy again on the back of geopolitical tensions and tariff threats,” Carsten Brzeski at ING said. Confidence likely took another hit in January after President Trump threatened to put extra tariffs on several European nations, including Germany, because they would not agree to a deal for the United States to “acquire” Greenland. Brzeski said people should not read too much into the Ifo number. It is not clear if most companies answered the survey before or after President Trump backed away from the additional tariff threats. The index showed the assessment of how things are right now went up slightly, while expectations for the future dropped a bit. By sector, the business climate got much better in manufacturing but got worse in services. Sentiment also went up in trade and construction, the Ifo Institute said. Signs of economic recovery emerge Information released earlier this month showed the German economy returned to growth last year for the first time since 2022, with output helped by more investment in the final three months of the year. Investor confidence jumped in January to its highest point since July 2021, based on the ZEW Indicator of Economic Sentiment, while purchasing managers’ indexes also improved. Factory data also points to a solid comeback in the industrial sector, which should get stronger as stimulus money starts flowing through the economy more quickly this year, Brzeski added. But Germany should not become too comfortable. The country needs major reforms to make sure growth bounces back and stays strong. “It is up to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and his government to implement these reforms this year and turn a long-awaited rebound into a sustainable recovery,” Brzeski said. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

26 Jan 2026, 16:34

Tom Lee’s BitMine Corners 3.5% of Ethereum Supply as Treasury Tops With 4.24M ETH Buy

BitMine Immersion Technologies, a New York–listed company chaired by Fundstrat’s Tom Lee, has quietly built one of the largest concentrated positions in Ethereum ever disclosed by a single entity. In an update published on January 26, BitMine said it now holds 4,243,338 ether, giving the company control of roughly 3.52% of Ethereum’s total circulating supply. BitMine provided its latest holdings update for January 26th, 2026: $12.8 billion in total crypto + "moonshots": – 4,243,338 ETH at $2,839 ( @coinbase ) – 193 Bitcoin (BTC) – $200 mllion stake in Beast Industries @MrBeast – $19 million stake in Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: $ORBS )… — Bitmine (NYSE-BMNR) $ETH (@BitMNR) January 26, 2026 At the time of disclosure, the position was valued at roughly $12 billion, making BitMine the largest Ethereum treasury in the world and the second-largest crypto treasury overall, behind Strategy Inc., formerly Strategy, which holds more than 700,000 bitcoin. BitMine Accelerates ETH Accumulation as Prices Slide The disclosure shows how quickly BitMine’s balance sheet has expanded over the past six months. Weekly purchase data shared by the company indicates steady accumulation since late October, 2025, with particularly large buying activity in December. In the week ending January 26 alone, BitMine added just over 40,000 ETH, following purchases of more than 35,000 ETH the prior week and several six-figure ETH buys in December. Last week the company bought the dip, purchasing $110M worth of Ethereum . BitMine @BitMNR now controls 3.48% of Ethereum’s total supply after adding $110M in $ETH during the dip, moving closer to its “Alchemy of 5%” goal. #Ethereum #BitMine https://t.co/W74cW2b8XH — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) January 21, 2026 The pace of accumulation has continued even as ether prices softened, with ETH down double digits over the past month amid broader market volatility. Ethereum is currently trading at $2,940.44, showing a 2.0% increase over the past hour, which suggests short-term buying pressure returning to the market. Source: Cryptonews On a 24-hour basis, ETH is up a modest 0.4%, indicating relatively stable price action despite broader market fluctuations. However, over the past seven days, Ethereum has declined by 8.4%, reaching as low as $2,787. Source: Bitmine BitMine’s total crypto, cash, and equity holdings now stand at $12.8 billion, according to the company. In addition to its Ethereum position, the firm holds 193 bitcoin, $682 million in cash, a $200 million stake in Beast Industries, and a smaller equity position in Eightco Holdings. BitMine’s Ethereum Bet Moves Closer to the 5% Mark The company trades on the NYSE American under the ticker BMNR and was last priced around $28.50, down modestly on the day and slightly lower over the past week. The Ethereum accumulation is central to BitMine’s stated long-term strategy, as it has publicly set a goal of acquiring 5% of Ethereum’s total supply, a target it refers to as the “alchemy of 5%.” Based on current supply estimates, reaching that level would require roughly 6 million ETH. At current market prices, closing that gap would require several billion dollars in additional capital. BitMine Expands Ethereum Staking as Holdings Grow Beyond holding ether on its balance sheet, BitMine is also expanding its staking operations. As of January 25, the company had staked 2,009,267 ETH, worth about $5.7 billion, representing nearly half of its total holdings. Source: Bitmine Using the composite Ethereum staking rate of roughly 2.81%, BitMine estimates that a fully deployed staking strategy could generate about $374 million in annual fees, or more than $1 million per day. For now, the company relies on external staking providers, but it plans to launch its infrastructure , known as the Made in America Validator Network, or MAVAN, in early 2026. BitMine @BitMNR plans an early-2026 launch of its MAVAN validator network, aiming to turn a $12B Ether treasury into staking yield at scale. #BitMine #Staking https://t.co/YOlkeNouQu — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) December 30, 2025 Chairman Tom Lee has framed the Ethereum strategy as a long-term bet on institutional adoption of blockchain technology. Speaking after last week’s World Economic Forum meeting in Davos , Lee said discussions among policymakers and business leaders increasingly point to the convergence of traditional finance, crypto, and artificial intelligence. He pointed to Ethereum’s role in tokenization and financial infrastructure projects as evidence that Wall Street is already building on the network. The post Tom Lee’s BitMine Corners 3.5% of Ethereum Supply as Treasury Tops With 4.24M ETH Buy appeared first on Cryptonews .