hodler

8 May 2026, 19:25

Bitwise CIO Sees Bitcoin’s Speculative Use Falling to Zero by 2050, Becoming a Central Bank Staple

BitcoinWorld Bitwise CIO Sees Bitcoin’s Speculative Use Falling to Zero by 2050, Becoming a Central Bank Staple Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise Asset Management, has made a bold, long-term prediction for Bitcoin: that its use as a speculative asset will decline to zero by the year 2050. By that time, he envisions Bitcoin functioning as a standard reserve asset held by central banks worldwide. A Shift from Speculation to Institutional Foundation Hougan’s forecast, reported by U.Today, traces Bitcoin’s journey from its origins in 2009, when its value was driven almost entirely by speculation, to a future where it is a foundational component of the global financial system. He suggests that the asset class is maturing beyond its early, volatile days into a recognized store of value. This perspective is notable coming from a leading figure at a major crypto asset management firm. It implies a fundamental shift in how Bitcoin is perceived and used, moving from a high-risk trade to a strategic, long-term holding for the world’s most powerful financial institutions. Context: The Cyclical Nature of Crypto Sentiment Hougan’s comments also serve as a commentary on the often-dramatic swings in market sentiment. He pointed out that just three months ago, many were declaring Bitcoin ‘dead.’ Now, the narrative has flipped, with some proclaiming gold—the traditional safe-haven asset—to be obsolete. Hougan hints that the true shift is the declining trust in fiat currency itself. This observation highlights the cyclical nature of the cryptocurrency market and the difficulty of making accurate short-term predictions. It also underscores a growing debate about the future of money, with Bitcoin and gold often positioned as competing alternatives to government-issued currencies. Why This Matters for Investors and the Broader Market While a prediction for 2050 is extremely long-term, it provides a framework for understanding Bitcoin’s potential trajectory. For investors, it suggests that the current volatility and speculative trading are not the final state of the asset. Instead, they may be a transitional phase toward broader, more stable adoption. The idea of central banks holding Bitcoin as a standard reserve asset would represent a complete reversal of current regulatory skepticism in many jurisdictions. It implies a future where Bitcoin is integrated into the very fabric of international finance, a concept that has significant implications for monetary policy, inflation hedging, and global economic stability. Conclusion Matt Hougan’s prediction is a thought-provoking, if speculative, look at Bitcoin’s potential endgame. It moves the conversation from daily price fluctuations to a multi-decade outlook on the asset’s role in the global economy. While the path to 2050 is uncertain and filled with potential regulatory and technological hurdles, the forecast reflects a growing conviction among some industry leaders that Bitcoin’s future lies not in trading, but in institutional trust. FAQs Q1: What exactly did Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan predict? He predicted that by the year 2050, Bitcoin’s use as a speculative asset will drop to 0%, and it will instead be used as a standard reserve asset by central banks globally. Q2: What does it mean for Bitcoin to be a ‘central bank reserve asset’? It means that central banks would hold Bitcoin as part of their official foreign exchange reserves, similar to how they currently hold gold or U.S. Treasury bonds, to back their currency and ensure financial stability. Q3: Is this prediction widely accepted? No, it is a long-term forecast from a single industry executive. While it reflects a bullish outlook from a major crypto asset manager, it is not a consensus view and faces significant obstacles, including regulatory hurdles and price volatility. This post Bitwise CIO Sees Bitcoin’s Speculative Use Falling to Zero by 2050, Becoming a Central Bank Staple first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

8 May 2026, 19:05

USD/JPY Slides Toward 156.60 as Safe-Haven Yen Gains on Escalating Middle East Tensions

BitcoinWorld USD/JPY Slides Toward 156.60 as Safe-Haven Yen Gains on Escalating Middle East Tensions The Japanese Yen strengthened against the US Dollar on Wednesday, pushing the USD/JPY pair toward the 156.60 level as escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East drove investors toward safe-haven assets. The move reflects a broader risk-off sentiment gripping global currency markets, with traders reassessing exposure to risk-sensitive currencies amid fresh reports of military escalation in the region. Geopolitical Drivers Behind the Yen Rally The Yen’s appreciation is primarily attributed to heightened safe-haven demand following reports of increased hostilities between Israel and Iran-aligned forces. Over the past 48 hours, airstrikes and retaliatory actions have raised fears of a broader regional conflict, prompting investors to rotate capital out of higher-yielding currencies and into traditional havens such as the Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc. Japan’s position as a net creditor nation and its deep, liquid government bond market make the Yen a preferred refuge during periods of geopolitical uncertainty. Unlike the US Dollar, which can be influenced by domestic economic data and Federal Reserve policy expectations, the Yen’s safe-haven appeal tends to strengthen when global risk appetite deteriorates sharply. Technical Levels and Market Positioning From a technical perspective, USD/JPY has broken below the 157.00 support zone, a level that had held firm since late January. The next key support sits at 156.50, followed by the 156.00 psychological barrier. On the upside, resistance now forms at 157.20 and 157.80, levels that could be tested if geopolitical tensions de-escalate or if US economic data surprises to the upside. Traders are closely monitoring the 156.60 area, which coincides with the 50-day moving average. A sustained break below this level could open the door for further downside toward the 155.80 region, a level not seen since early February. Volume data suggests that speculative short positions on the Yen have been reduced, but further position unwinding could accelerate the move. Broader Market Implications The Yen’s strength is also being amplified by a simultaneous decline in US Treasury yields, as investors flock to government bonds. The yield on the 10-year US Treasury note fell 4 basis points to 4.28% in early European trading, reducing the interest rate differential that had previously supported the Dollar against the Yen. This narrowing differential reduces the carry trade appeal of holding long USD/JPY positions. For Japanese importers and exporters, the Yen’s appreciation provides mixed signals. Exporters such as Toyota and Sony benefit from a stronger Yen when repatriating overseas profits, while importers of energy and raw materials face lower costs. However, a rapid move could disrupt corporate planning, particularly for firms that had hedged at weaker Yen levels. What to Watch Next Market participants are now awaiting any diplomatic developments that could ease tensions, as well as upcoming US economic data including weekly jobless claims and the Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index. A surprise improvement in US data could temporarily reverse some Yen gains, but analysts caution that geopolitical headlines are likely to remain the dominant driver in the near term. The Bank of Japan’s monetary policy stance also remains a background factor. While the BoJ has signaled a gradual normalization path, the current crisis-driven flows are overriding domestic policy expectations. Any verbal intervention from Japanese officials warning against excessive Yen volatility could introduce additional near-term noise. Conclusion The USD/JPY slide toward 156.60 underscores how quickly geopolitical risk can reshape currency markets. While the Yen’s safe-haven status is well-established, the speed and magnitude of the move highlight the market’s sensitivity to Middle East developments. Traders should brace for continued volatility as the situation evolves, with technical levels and geopolitical headlines likely to dictate the next directional move. FAQs Q1: Why does the Yen strengthen during geopolitical tensions? The Yen is considered a safe-haven currency because Japan has a large current account surplus, deep government bond markets, and a stable political system. During global uncertainty, investors sell riskier assets and buy Yen, driving its value up. Q2: What is the key support level for USD/JPY right now? The immediate support is at 156.50, followed by the 156.00 psychological level. A break below 156.00 could lead to a test of the 155.80 area, which was last seen in early February. Q3: Could the Bank of Japan intervene to weaken the Yen? While the BoJ has historically intervened to curb excessive Yen weakness or volatility, the current move is driven by geopolitical risk rather than speculative excess. Verbal warnings are possible, but actual intervention is less likely unless the move becomes disorderly or threatens financial stability. This post USD/JPY Slides Toward 156.60 as Safe-Haven Yen Gains on Escalating Middle East Tensions first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

8 May 2026, 19:00

India’s Monsoon Risks and the RBI’s Delicate Balancing Act: A DBS Analysis

BitcoinWorld India’s Monsoon Risks and the RBI’s Delicate Balancing Act: A DBS Analysis A new analysis from DBS Group Research highlights the critical intersection of India’s monsoon season and the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) monetary policy stance, underscoring the delicate balance the central bank must maintain between supporting growth and controlling inflation. Monsoon’s Dual Role in the Indian Economy The southwest monsoon, which typically spans from June to September, is the lifeblood of Indian agriculture, providing about 70% of the country’s annual rainfall. A normal or above-normal monsoon can boost agricultural output, support rural demand, and ease food price pressures. Conversely, a deficient or erratic monsoon can lead to crop damage, reduce farm incomes, and push food prices higher, complicating the RBI’s inflation targeting mandate. DBS’s report emphasizes that while a normal monsoon is currently forecast, the distribution of rainfall across regions and over time remains a key variable. Localized floods or dry spells can still disrupt supply chains for essential commodities like vegetables, pulses, and edible oils, which have a significant weight in the consumer price index (CPI). Implications for the RBI’s Monetary Policy The RBI has maintained a status quo on interest rates for several consecutive meetings, balancing above-target inflation against the need to support economic growth. The DBS analysis suggests that monsoon performance will be a decisive factor in the central bank’s next move. If the monsoon is normal and food inflation moderates, the RBI may find room to adopt a more accommodative stance, potentially cutting rates to stimulate investment and consumption. However, if monsoon risks materialize and food prices spike, the RBI could be forced to keep rates higher for longer, or even consider a hike, to anchor inflation expectations. Why This Matters for Investors and Consumers For financial markets, the monsoon outlook is a near-term risk factor. Bond yields and currency markets are sensitive to inflation surprises. For consumers, the trajectory of food prices directly affects household budgets. The DBS report serves as a timely reminder that weather patterns remain a powerful, unpredictable force in one of the world’s fastest-growing major economies. The analysis also points to the government’s role, noting that timely policy interventions—such as managing buffer stocks of grains and pulses, and ensuring smooth distribution of fertilizers and seeds—can help mitigate some of the risks posed by an uneven monsoon. Conclusion As the monsoon season progresses, all eyes will be on rainfall data and its impact on crop sowing and prices. DBS’s analysis provides a clear framework for understanding how this seasonal phenomenon directly influences the RBI’s policy calculus, with significant implications for India’s economic outlook, market stability, and the cost of living for millions. FAQs Q1: How does the monsoon affect India’s inflation? The monsoon directly impacts agricultural output. A good monsoon leads to higher crop yields, which can lower food prices. A poor monsoon can damage crops, reduce supply, and push up food inflation, which is a major component of India’s CPI. Q2: What is the RBI’s current monetary policy stance? The RBI has kept the repo rate unchanged at 6.50% for several meetings, maintaining a ‘withdrawal of accommodation’ stance. The central bank is closely monitoring inflation, which has remained above its 4% target, before considering any rate cuts. Q3: What are the key risks DBS highlights regarding the monsoon? DBS highlights risks related to uneven rainfall distribution, localized flooding or drought, and their potential to disrupt supply chains for key food items. These factors could keep food inflation elevated, limiting the RBI’s ability to cut interest rates. This post India’s Monsoon Risks and the RBI’s Delicate Balancing Act: A DBS Analysis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

8 May 2026, 18:37

Swiss Bitcoin Reserve Campaign Fails to Secure 100,000 Signatures, What Next?

Switzerland’s campaign to require the Swiss National Bank to hold Bitcoin as part of its official reserves is set to lapse after organisers failed to collect enough signatures for a national referendum. The campaign, known as the Bitcoin Initiative, sought to amend Article 99 of the Swiss Constitution so that the Swiss National Bank would hold Bitcoin alongside gold as part of its monetary reserves. Supporters argued that Bitcoin could strengthen Swiss financial sovereignty and give the country a politically neutral reserve asset outside the traditional dollar and euro system. Under Switzerland’s federal popular initiative process, campaigners needed 100,000 valid signatures within 18 months to move the proposal toward a national vote. Organizers collected about 50,000 signatures, roughly half the required total, with only a few weeks left before the deadline. Founder Yves Bennaïm said the campaign would be allowed to lapse rather than pursue a final push. He said supporters had always viewed the effort as difficult because of the technical nature of the proposal and limited resources. SNB Keeps Bitcoin Outside Reserve Policy The Swiss National Bank has repeatedly rejected the idea of adding Bitcoin to official reserves. SNB Chair Martin Schlegel said in April that cryptocurrencies do not currently meet the central bank’s requirements for reserve assets. The SNB manages reserves with a focus on liquidity, value preservation and monetary policy flexibility. Its balance sheet includes gold, foreign currency assets, its International Monetary Fund reserve position and international payment instruments. Central banks usually require reserve assets that can be bought and sold at large scale during periods of market stress. The SNB has argued that Bitcoin’s volatility and liquidity profile make it unsuitable for that role under current reserve standards. Bitcoin supporters challenged that view by pointing to Bitcoin’s fixed supply, global trading activity and independence from any single state. They said a limited allocation, such as 1% to 2% of reserves, could support diversification without replacing the SNB’s existing asset base. Signature Shortfall Limits Next Step The failure to reach 100,000 signatures means the proposal will not move to a national vote. Switzerland’s direct-democracy system gives citizens a formal path to propose constitutional changes, but the threshold often prevents smaller campaigns from advancing. The Bitcoin Initiative gained visibility among crypto supporters and policy watchers, but it did not attract enough public backing to force a binding referendum. The result leaves the SNB’s reserve framework unchanged. The campaign’s outcome also shows the gap between Switzerland’s crypto industry and national monetary policy. Switzerland remains one of Europe’s most active digital asset hubs, with Zug’s “Crypto Valley” hosting blockchain firms, foundations and financial technology companies. However, support for blockchain businesses does not automatically translate into voter support for changing central bank reserve rules. Reserve policy remains tied to public trust, monetary stability and the SNB’s legal mandate. Global Bitcoin Reserve Debate Continues The Swiss campaign’s failure does not end wider debate over Bitcoin reserves. Several governments and central banks have reviewed or rejected similar ideas as digital assets become larger parts of global financial markets. The United Kingdom formally rejected a Bitcoin reserve proposal in 2025, saying it was not suitable for the British market. South Korea’s central bank has said it has not reviewed adding Bitcoin to foreign exchange reserves, citing volatility concerns. Japan has also declined national Bitcoin reserve proposals. The European Central Bank remains skeptical of crypto reserve assets, saying reserve holdings must be liquid, safe, and secure. Germany also chose not to keep seized Bitcoin as a reserve asset after selling a large stockpile in 2024. At the same time, some institutions have tested digital assets on a limited basis. According to reports, the Czech National Bank bought a small amount of cryptocurrency and blockchain-based assets to gain operational experience. In the United States, debate continues over the BITCOIN Act and the legal structure of a federal Bitcoin reserve. Supporters argue that Bitcoin could serve as a long-term national asset, while critics point to volatility, custody risks, and limits on government financial flexibility.

8 May 2026, 18:10

Tucker Carlson Calls Markets ‘Fake’ After 60 Days of Middle East Conflict

Tucker Carlson told his audience that financial markets are no longer free or open, calling their behavior during the ongoing Iran conflict not just strange but deliberately manufactured. Tucker Carlson: ‘Markets Are Doing Things You Would Not Expect Markets to Do’ The comments came against a backdrop that has left many analysts searching for explanations.

8 May 2026, 18:00

Lagarde Says ECB Needs Tokenised Money, Not Crypto Stablecoins

ECB President Christine Lagarde has pushed back against the idea that Europe should answer dollar crypto stablecoin dominance by promoting euro-denominated stablecoins of its own, arguing instead that the region should build tokenised financial infrastructure anchored in central bank money. In a speech at the Banco de España LatAm Economic Forum in Roda de Bará, Spain, Lagarde framed stablecoins as one of the fastest-moving policy questions in global finance. The market, she said, has grown from less than $10 billion six years ago to more than $300 billion today, with close to 98% of stablecoins denominated in US dollars and nearly 90% controlled by Tether and Circle. Lagarde: ECB Must Not Copy US Crypto Stablecoin Model That concentration has turned crypto stablecoins into more than a crypto-market instrument. In Lagarde’s view, they now sit at the intersection of monetary power, financial stability and tokenised-market infrastructure. “The growing argument is that to remain relevant, Europe must respond by promoting euro-denominated stablecoins of its own,” Lagarde said. “Otherwise, it faces a future of digital dollaritation and a loss of monetary sovereignty.” But she argued that this framing misses the central issue. Stablecoins, according to Lagarde, perform two separate functions that are often conflated: a monetary function, by extending the reach of a currency, and a technological function, by acting as the cash leg for settlement on distributed ledger infrastructure. “The argument I want to develop today is that once we disentangle those two functions, the case for promoting euro-denominated stablecoins is far weaker than it appears,” she said. “And a more fundamental question comes into view: do we actually need stablecoins to obtain the benefits they are said to provide? Or are we mistaking the instrument for the outcome?” Lagarde acknowledged that stablecoins have become central to crypto settlement and increasingly relevant for cross-border payments, particularly in regions where access to stable currencies is limited. She also noted that dollar-backed stablecoins can reinforce demand for US Treasuries, especially if they become yield-bearing instruments. That dynamic is now openly part of US policy. Lagarde pointed to the GENIUS Act , which the US administration has described not only as a consumer protection and financial stability measure, but also as a tool to support “the continued global dominance of the U.S. dollar” and strengthen demand for Treasuries. For Europe, however, Lagarde said the monetary case for euro stablecoins is weak once risks are included. Under MiCAR, euro-denominated stablecoins could create additional demand for euro-area safe assets and marginally extend the euro’s international reach. Yet she argued that the trade-offs would be material. The first is financial stability. Lagarde cited Circle’s USDC depeg during the Silicon Valley Bank collapse in March 2023, when Circle disclosed that $3.3 billion of USDC reserves were held at the failed bank and the token briefly fell to $0.877.“The promise of par redemption depends on the very market confidence that can vanish when financial stability deteriorates,” she said. “And a mass redemption can accelerate that deterioration.” The second risk is monetary policy transmission. If retail deposits migrate into non-bank stablecoins and return to banks as wholesale funding, the ECB’s rate decisions may transmit less effectively through the banking system. Lagarde said this matters particularly in the euro area, where banks remain the dominant source of credit to the real economy. Her conclusion was blunt: stablecoins are not an efficient way to strengthen the euro’s international role. The better route, she said, is deeper capital-market integration through Europe’s savings and investments union, alongside a safe asset base that matches the euro’s global ambitions. Where Lagarde was more constructive was on tokenisation itself. She described DLT-based market infrastructure as genuinely transformative, especially for Europe’s fragmented financial system. In 2023, the EU had 295 trading venues, 14 central clearing counterparties and 32 central securities depositories, compared with two clearing houses and one central securities depository in the US. Stablecoins currently fill the settlement gap in tokenized markets because they provide an on-chain unit of value for atomic settlement. But Lagarde argued that private stablecoins are fragile and fragmented foundations for that role. The ECB’s answer is public infrastructure. From September, the Eurosystem plans to offer wholesale settlement through the Pontes project, linking DLT platforms to TARGET so transactions can settle in central bank money. Lagarde also pointed to the Appia roadmap, published in March, which aims to support a fully interoperable European tokenised financial ecosystem by 2028. “Europe knows which port it is sailing to,” Lagarde concluded. “Our task is not to replicate instruments developed elsewhere, but to build the foundations and the infrastructure that serve our own objectives, so that we can harness the benefits of innovation without importing the fragilities.” At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.64 trillion.