hodler

23 Feb 2026, 21:45

Bitcoin may reverse course and rally to $75K: Here’s how

Traders struggle to determine if the crypto market bottom is in, but liquidity fears, AI industry valuation worries, and BTC mining strength could send Bitcoin back to $75,000.

23 Feb 2026, 20:25

Quantum Computing Bitcoin Threat: Michael Saylor Dismisses Critical Fear as Market Distraction

BitcoinWorld Quantum Computing Bitcoin Threat: Michael Saylor Dismisses Critical Fear as Market Distraction In a significant statement from New York on November 15, 2024, Michael Saylor, the executive chairman and Bitcoin advocate of MicroStrategy, directly addressed growing anxieties about quantum computing’s potential impact on cryptocurrency security. During a detailed podcast discussion, Saylor characterized the quantum computing threat to Bitcoin as the latest in a cyclical pattern of market fears, drawing direct parallels to previous concerns that ultimately failed to destabilize the digital asset’s fundamental value proposition. His analysis provides crucial context for understanding how psychological narratives influence cryptocurrency markets, especially regarding technological evolution and security perceptions. Analyzing the Quantum Computing Bitcoin Threat Narrative Michael Saylor’s dismissal of quantum computing concerns represents more than casual commentary. It reflects a seasoned perspective from someone overseeing the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin treasury, currently holding approximately 226,331 BTC valued at over $15 billion. Saylor specifically described the quantum threat as a “psychological tactic” that emerges when markets lack other compelling narratives. This pattern recognition comes from observing multiple fear cycles throughout Bitcoin’s history. Consequently, investors should consider whether current concerns represent genuine technological risk or market psychology. The conversation about quantum resistance has intensified recently as quantum computing advances from theoretical research toward practical applications. However, Saylor’s position suggests the timeline for any meaningful threat remains distant compared to immediate market concerns. Quantum computing utilizes quantum bits or “qubits” that can exist in multiple states simultaneously. This capability theoretically allows quantum computers to solve certain mathematical problems exponentially faster than classical computers. Specifically, they could potentially break the cryptographic algorithms securing Bitcoin transactions and wallets. Despite this theoretical vulnerability, the practical implementation remains years away from posing an actual threat. Leading researchers estimate that breaking Bitcoin’s Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) would require a quantum computer with millions of qubits maintaining near-perfect coherence. Current state-of-the-art quantum processors contain only hundreds of qubits with significant error rates. Therefore, the technological gap remains substantial. Historical Context of Cryptocurrency Market Fears Saylor’s argument gains credibility when examined alongside Bitcoin’s historical resilience. He specifically recalled three sequential fears that previously pressured the market without causing permanent damage. First, concerns emerged that China would dominate Bitcoin mining entirely. Second, worries spread about potential backdoors in Chinese-manufactured mining equipment. Third, China’s eventual nationwide ban on cryptocurrency mining in 2021 created significant market volatility. Each concern generated substantial media attention and investor anxiety. However, Bitcoin’s network adapted through geographic redistribution of mining power and continued operating without compromise. This historical pattern demonstrates the cryptocurrency’s antifragile characteristics. The table below illustrates key market fears and Bitcoin’s subsequent adaptation: Fear Period Primary Concern Market Impact Bitcoin’s Adaptation 2017-2019 Chinese Mining Dominance Centralization worries Mining diversified globally 2019-2020 Hardware Backdoors Security concerns Transparency increased 2021 China Mining Ban Hash rate dropped 50% Network recovered in months 2023-Present Quantum Computing Theoretical vulnerability Post-quantum cryptography research This historical perspective reveals several important patterns. Market fears often precede actual technological or regulatory developments. The Bitcoin network consistently demonstrates remarkable resilience through community-driven solutions. Adaptation periods typically last months rather than years. Consequently, Saylor’s comparison suggests quantum computing concerns may follow a similar trajectory of initial anxiety followed by gradual resolution. Expert Perspectives on Cryptographic Security Cryptography experts generally support Saylor’s timeline assessment while acknowledging the theoretical risk. Dr. Michele Mosca, co-founder of the University of Waterloo’s Institute for Quantum Computing, famously developed “Mosca’s Theorem” regarding quantum threats. He estimates a 50% probability that quantum computers will break current public-key cryptography by 2031. However, this timeline refers to initial capability rather than widespread, affordable access. The cryptocurrency community has already begun preparing for this eventuality through several approaches: Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC): The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been evaluating quantum-resistant algorithms since 2016, with several finalists selected for standardization expected by 2024. Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs): Developers have discussed potential protocol upgrades, including quantum-resistant signature schemes like Lamport signatures or hash-based cryptography. Layer-2 Solutions: Technologies like the Lightning Network could potentially implement quantum-resistant features independently from the base layer. Key Rotation Strategies: Users can protect funds by moving them to new addresses before quantum computers become capable, as only exposed public keys are vulnerable. These preparations indicate the cryptocurrency ecosystem isn’t ignoring quantum risks but addressing them proactively. The Bitcoin protocol’s upgrade mechanism allows for cryptographic algorithm changes when necessary, similar to how it transitioned from SHA-1 to SHA-256 in earlier development stages. This adaptability forms a crucial part of Saylor’s argument that quantum threats represent manageable challenges rather than existential risks. Psychological Dynamics in Cryptocurrency Markets Saylor’s characterization of quantum fears as “the latest fad” touches upon important behavioral finance principles. Cryptocurrency markets remain particularly susceptible to narrative-driven volatility due to several factors. First, the technical complexity creates information asymmetry where most participants rely on simplified explanations. Second, the market’s 24/7 nature and global accessibility amplify reaction speeds to news events. Third, the substantial price volatility attracts speculative behavior that feeds on uncertainty. These conditions create fertile ground for fear narratives to gain disproportionate traction. Research into market psychology identifies several relevant phenomena. The “availability heuristic” causes investors to overweight recent or vivid information, such as dramatic headlines about quantum breakthroughs. “Confirmation bias” leads participants to seek information supporting existing beliefs about technological threats. “Narrative economics” demonstrates how stories spread through markets and influence decision-making independently of fundamental data. Saylor’s perspective suggests quantum computing concerns may represent a contemporary manifestation of these psychological patterns rather than a reflection of immediate technological reality. MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin Strategy and Risk Assessment MicroStrategy’s substantial Bitcoin holdings provide important context for Saylor’s statements. As a publicly traded company subject to SEC regulations and shareholder scrutiny, MicroStrategy conducts rigorous risk assessment regarding its digital asset treasury. The company’s investment thesis depends on Bitcoin maintaining long-term security and value preservation properties. Therefore, Saylor’s dismissal of quantum threats indicates either confidence in Bitcoin’s adaptability or assessment that the timeline exceeds the company’s investment horizon. MicroStrategy has consistently added to its Bitcoin position despite various market fears, demonstrating conviction in the asset’s resilience. The company’s approach involves several risk mitigation strategies. It holds Bitcoin in secure custody solutions with multi-signature protection. It maintains operational transparency through regular public disclosures. It focuses on long-term holding rather than short-term trading. This strategic framework suggests MicroStrategy views quantum computing as a manageable risk within its broader risk assessment framework. The company’s continued accumulation of Bitcoin despite quantum concerns indicates either belief in adequate preparation time or confidence in the ecosystem’s adaptive capacity. Technological Realities of Quantum Advancement Understanding the actual quantum computing landscape provides crucial perspective. Current quantum computers remain in what researchers call the “Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum” (NISQ) era. These machines can perform specific calculations but lack the error correction and qubit counts needed for cryptographic attacks. Major technology companies and research institutions continue making progress, but several significant hurdles remain. Quantum error correction requires substantial overhead, with some estimates suggesting needing 1,000 physical qubits to create one stable logical qubit. Coherence times remain limited, restricting computation duration. Scaling quantum systems presents enormous engineering challenges. The cryptocurrency ecosystem monitors these developments through several channels. The Bitcoin Core development community tracks cryptographic research. Academic conferences like Real World Crypto regularly feature quantum computing sessions. Industry groups like the Blockchain Association maintain technical committees examining emerging threats. This monitoring ensures adequate preparation time for any necessary protocol changes. The consensus among technical experts suggests Bitcoin would require approximately five years to implement and deploy quantum-resistant cryptography once the need becomes imminent. Given current quantum computing timelines, this provides substantial buffer. Conclusion Michael Saylor’s dismissal of the quantum computing threat to Bitcoin reflects both historical perspective and strategic assessment. His comparison to previous market fears—Chinese mining dominance, hardware backdoors, and the mining ban—demonstrates Bitcoin’s consistent resilience against perceived existential threats. While quantum computing presents genuine theoretical vulnerabilities, the practical timeline for meaningful risk appears distant relative to market anxiety cycles. The cryptocurrency ecosystem maintains active preparation through post-quantum cryptography research and protocol development pathways. Investors should distinguish between legitimate technological monitoring and psychological market narratives when evaluating quantum computing concerns. As with previous fear cycles, Bitcoin’s adaptive capabilities and decentralized development process will likely address quantum threats through measured, community-driven solutions when necessary. FAQs Q1: What exactly is the quantum computing threat to Bitcoin? The threat involves quantum computers potentially breaking Bitcoin’s cryptographic security. Specifically, they could theoretically reverse-engineer private keys from public addresses or forge digital signatures. This capability would compromise wallet security and transaction integrity. Q2: How soon could quantum computers actually break Bitcoin’s cryptography? Most experts estimate meaningful capability remains 10-15 years away. Current quantum computers lack sufficient qubits and error correction. Breaking Bitcoin’s encryption requires millions of stable qubits, while today’s most advanced systems have only hundreds with significant error rates. Q3: What is Bitcoin doing to prepare for quantum computing? The ecosystem engages in multiple preparation strategies. These include monitoring post-quantum cryptography standardization by NIST, researching quantum-resistant signature algorithms, developing upgrade pathways, and educating users about key management practices that reduce vulnerability. Q4: Why does Michael Saylor compare quantum fears to China’s mining ban? Saylor observes similar psychological patterns. Both situations generated substantial market anxiety about Bitcoin’s survival. Both represented external threats beyond individual control. Both prompted predictions of catastrophic failure that didn’t materialize as the network adapted successfully. Q5: Should Bitcoin investors be worried about quantum computing? Investors should maintain awareness but not panic. The threat remains theoretical with substantial timeline. The Bitcoin development community actively monitors the situation. Historical precedent shows Bitcoin’s ability to adapt to technological challenges through decentralized upgrades when necessary. This post Quantum Computing Bitcoin Threat: Michael Saylor Dismisses Critical Fear as Market Distraction first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

23 Feb 2026, 16:00

1000 XRP daily – WPA Hash Cloud Mining helps Ripple investors profit efficiently

Recently, XRP (Ripple) market activity has continued to rise, with more and more XRP holders focusing on how to improve asset utilization efficiency without frequent trading. WPA Hash cloud mining, as one of the computing power service platforms, is drawing market attention to its “high-frequency output potential” through its XRP-centric cloud mining model. Market participants have pointed out that, under specific computing power scale and contract configuration conditions, the cloud mining model provides XRP holders with opportunities to explore higher daily output levels, but the related returns still depend on computing power investment and contract cycles. The Real Needs of XRP Holders are Changing For a long time, the main source of income for XRP holders has been price fluctuations. However, as the market gradually becomes more rational, relying solely on price increases and decreases is no longer sufficient to meet the needs of some users for a continuous cash flow. Against this backdrop, computing power participation models based on blockchain infrastructure are gradually becoming a new approach to XRP asset management. WPA Hash cloud mining offers users a simplified way to participate by centralizing technology and operations. WPA Hash Core Advantages: Register an Account Visit the WPA Hash official website and create an account using your email address to receive a $15 new user bonus. Deposit Select your cryptocurrency in the “Deposit Center,” and the system will provide you with a unique wallet address. Copy this address and then transfer cryptocurrency from your wallet or exchange. Choose a Mining Contract Select a suitable cloud mining plan (short-term/long-term/high-yield) based on your personal preferences and confirm your purchase. Contract Price Contract duration Daily income Total revenue $100 2 $3 $100 + $6 $500 5 $6.00 $500 + $30 $1,000 12 $13.00 $1000+ $156 $3,000 18 $42.00 $3000+ $756 $5,000 25 $75.00 $5000+ $1875 $8,000 30 $128.00 $8000+ $3840 [Click to learn more about contract details] Enjoy the Returns After purchasing the contract, the system automatically distributes returns to your account balance every 24 hours, supporting withdrawals or reinvestment at any time. Industry Observation: Computing Power Services are Becoming More Segmented From a broader perspective, cloud mining services surrounding mainstream digital assets like XRP reflect the blockchain industry’s shift from a purely transaction-oriented approach to infrastructure and asset management services. The segmentation and specialization of computing power services may become an important part of the future digital asset market. Conclusion As the XRP market continues to develop, WPA Hash cloud mining provides Ripple holders with a path to explore the asset’s output potential. While “earning 1000 XRP per day” represents more of a market focus, what it reflects is a redefinition of asset utilization through computing power participation models. Looking ahead, as industry standards and technology mature, whether cloud mining can play a longer-term role in the XRP ecosystem remains to be seen and will require continued market observation. Official Website: https://wpahash.com Official Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Times Tabloid, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. The post 1000 XRP daily – WPA Hash Cloud Mining helps Ripple investors profit efficiently appeared first on Times Tabloid .

23 Feb 2026, 15:32

Bitdeer sells 1,100+ BTC as it shifts from mining to AI infrastructure

Bitdeer has completely emptied out its Bitcoin treasury of over a thousand BTC, citing a need to fund its AI and high-performance computing (HPC) ambitions. The company has been whittling down its BTC holdings since early 2026. The decision has drawn much concern as institutional holders of Bitcoin typically employ a HODL strategy. Bitdeer’s total Bitcoin liquidation The Bitcoin mining giant Bitdeer has officially cleared its Bitcoin treasury. The company liquidated 943.1 BTC from its holdings and an additional 184 BTC that it had mined over the weekend of February 21, 2026. The financial data on Bitdeer’s holdings show a steady decline that led up to this final sale. The company started 2026 with approximately 2,000 BTC, but by the end of January, that number had dropped to 1,530 BTC. By February 13, it sat at 943.1 BTC before the final liquidation this past weekend. Bitcoin is currently trading between $65,000 and $68,000, a significant drop of nearly 50% from the token’s October all-time highs. The price decline, combined with the fact that Bitcoin mining profits have hit record lows, led to speculations that Bitdeer was having a potential liquidity crisis. However, the company moved quickly to dismiss these concerns , instead explaining that the liquidation is a calculated move to fund a massive expansion. Bitdeer also recently announced a $43.7 million equity offering and a convertible note agreement that could be worth up to $325 million. In an official statement, Bitdeer explained that it is currently evaluating several “non-binding powered land acquisition opportunities.” The company is redirecting its money toward artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC), two far more attractive businesses than traditional Bitcoin mining. Industry data suggests that AI infrastructure can generate between three to twenty-five times more revenue per megawatt of power than mining. Furthermore, profit margins for AI workloads often stay between 80% and 90%. Other major firms, such as Core Scientific and Cipher Mining, have also been signing massive deals to host AI chips for tech companies. In the same statement, the company assured its shareholders that its hashrate will continue to grow. The company’s self-managed hashrate has already grown to the point where it surpasses MARA (formerly Marathon Digital), making Bitdeer the largest publicly traded miner by self-operated capacity. Bitdeer retains its global hashrate lead despite liquidating BTC holdings. Source: Bitcoin Mining Stock Bitdeer accelerates growth plan Cryptopolitan reported in January that Bitdeer Technologies Group surpassed MARA Holdings to become the Bitcoin miner in the market by total hashrate. The milestone was the result of an aggressive expansion plot that saw the firm shoot up the rankings from October 2025, when it became the fifth-biggest crypto mining company in terms of hash rate power. The firm faced a minor setback in November when a fire damaged two buildings at its Bitcoin mining complex in Massillon, Ohio. Bitdeer’s chairman and chief executive officer, Jihan Wu, confirmed the fire on X, writing, “Two buildings (of 26) down and no people hurt. Senior management team is running there and will investigate further.” “Bitdeer reported 71 EH/s capacity as of end December (~6% of global hash rate), +18% m/m, +229% y/y,” VanEck Head of Research Matt Sigel said on X at the time. “Like other miners, they are actively selling everything they mine (and more) to fund the AI pivot.” Bitdeer’s decision to sell all its Bitcoin is being regarded as one of the clearest signs yet that the “HODL” strategy is fading for public companies. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

23 Feb 2026, 15:00

Bitdeer Says Bitcoin Liquidation “Not A Concern” For Broader Market

Bitcoin miner Bitdeer has defended its decision to liquidate its Bitcoin holdings, saying it shouldn’t be a concern for the broader market. Bitdeer’s Bitcoin Holdings Have Hit Zero On Saturday, Bitdeer shared its weekly Bitcoin update in an X post , revealing that the company sold all of its mining output for the week. In total, the firm mined 189.8 BTC during the window, but due to the sale, its net holdings hit zero. Based in Singapore, Bitdeer is a BTC mining platform that operates facilities in the US, Norway, and Bhutan, among other countries. According to BitcoinMiningStock , the firm’s active computing power or “ Hashrate ” is currently the largest out of all public miners, sitting at 63.2 exhashes per second (EH/s). While Bitdeer is an established name in the space, it appears to be undergoing a change of strategy. Earlier, the firm would choose to sit on part of or all of its weekly BTC output, but the recent selling to a zero treasury balance reflects a shift. Bitdeer took to X on Monday to talk about its BTC liquidation. “Our decision to sell Bitcoin should not be a concern for the broader market,” said the company. Bitdeer noted that it’s currently evaluating land acquisition opportunities and believes it to be prudent to prepare liquidity now. The BTC miner has been expanding into AI infrastructure recently with its “Bitdeer AI” venture, so it’s possible that the land acquisition is linked to the firm’s datacenter push. Bitdeer isn’t the only mining company that has been expanding into AI. Cango , the fifth largest miner in terms of operating Hashrate, announced a 4,451 BTC sale earlier in February as it looked to pivot into the AI compute business. Similarly, Bitfarms, the tenth largest BTC mining firm, also revealed a strategy shift in November, noting that a high-performance computing (HPC) business pivot could make the company more profitable than Bitcoin mining ever was. Bitfarms plans to wind down its mining facilities over the course of 2026 and 2027, while Cango has so far remained committed to its mining business. Bitdeer also doesn’t appear to be backing off from BTC mining, as it said, “Our hash rate will continue to grow, and we will continue to mine more Bitcoin for the interest of our shareholders.” BTC Plunges To Low $64,000 Levels Before Bouncing Back Bitcoin has kicked off the new week with some volatility as its price first fell to around $64,300 for the first time since February 5th, before rebounding back up to the $66,100 mark. The chart below showcases the latest price action in the cryptocurrency.

23 Feb 2026, 12:00

Bitdeer Liquidates Entire Bitcoin Reserve, Adopts New Mining Strategy

Bitdeer sold all its bitcoin reserves over eight weeks, leaving its balance at zero. The company cites liquidity and infrastructure needs, not market pessimism, for the move. Continue Reading: Bitdeer Liquidates Entire Bitcoin Reserve, Adopts New Mining Strategy The post Bitdeer Liquidates Entire Bitcoin Reserve, Adopts New Mining Strategy appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .