hodler

20 Apr 2026, 16:22

Reabold eyes 50,000 BTC with UK gas-powered mining

🚀 Reabold Resources plans a natural gas-powered Bitcoin mining facility targeting up to 50,000 $BTC. The company secures exclusive gas rights at the West Newton site in northern England. Continue Reading: Reabold eyes 50,000 BTC with UK gas-powered mining The post Reabold eyes 50,000 BTC with UK gas-powered mining appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

20 Apr 2026, 15:22

UK gas-investment firm weighs bitcoin mining, draws criticism

Reabold Resources' gas field is so large it could theoretically mine 50,000 BTC, local media said. The firm said it will test bitcoin mining before pivoting to data centers.

20 Apr 2026, 13:00

These top 6 AI crypto and stock trading bots are trending in 2026. Are they better than mining?

Are AI trading bots replacing Bitcoin mining? In 2026, AI-powered trading is transforming how investors participate in both cryptocurrency and stock markets. More users are adopting AI crypto trading bots and AI stock trading bots to automate strategies, reduce manual effort, and improve efficiency. At the same time, Bitcoin mining is becoming less accessible due Continue reading "These top 6 AI crypto and stock trading bots are trending in 2026. Are they better than mining?"

20 Apr 2026, 11:40

Record Exodus: Public Bitcoin Miners Dump 32,000 BTC in Q1 2025 to Fuel AI Ambitions

BitcoinWorld Record Exodus: Public Bitcoin Miners Dump 32,000 BTC in Q1 2025 to Fuel AI Ambitions In a landmark shift for the cryptocurrency sector, publicly traded Bitcoin mining firms executed a record sell-off during the first quarter of 2025, liquidating approximately 32,000 BTC according to data from analytics firm Solid Intel. This unprecedented move, representing billions in value, signals a profound strategic realignment within the industry. Consequently, these companies are now channeling capital and resources toward establishing themselves as providers of high-performance computing infrastructure for artificial intelligence. This pivot reflects broader economic pressures and evolving technological opportunities reshaping the digital asset landscape. Public Bitcoin Miners Sell Record Holdings in Strategic Shift The first quarter of 2025 witnessed a seismic change in treasury management by major listed mining entities. Data indicates the 32,000 BTC sold marks a significant increase compared to previous quarters. For instance, sales in Q4 2024 totaled roughly 18,000 BTC. This surge represents a deliberate capital reallocation strategy rather than a reaction to short-term price volatility. Mining companies typically hold Bitcoin as a primary reserve asset, making such large-scale divestment a notable event. Furthermore, this activity directly impacts Bitcoin’s liquid supply on exchanges, potentially influencing market dynamics. The trend underscores a calculated move away from pure-play Bitcoin production. Several factors converged to drive this record quarterly sale. Firstly, the need to fund massive capital expenditures for new data center builds and advanced GPU procurement is paramount. Secondly, maintaining operational liquidity amid fluctuating Bitcoin prices and rising global energy costs remains critical. Additionally, shareholder pressure for diversified revenue streams and reduced cryptocurrency exposure has intensified. Companies like Core Scientific, Riot Platforms, and CleanSpark have publicly outlined plans to expand into AI cloud services. Therefore, selling Bitcoin reserves provides the necessary dry powder to execute these capital-intensive transitions without excessive debt. The Driving Force Behind the Mining Industry Pivot The strategic pivot from Bitcoin mining to AI infrastructure is not arbitrary. It is a response to converging economic and technological realities. AI model training and inference require immense, sustained computational power, creating soaring demand for data center capacity. Bitcoin mining operations already possess critical infrastructure: secure, scalable facilities with robust power contracts and cooling systems. Repurposing this infrastructure for AI workloads offers a potentially more stable and lucrative business model. The revenue from AI compute contracts is often denominated in fiat currency, providing a hedge against crypto market cycles. This transition mirrors earlier evolutions within the tech sector, where companies adapt core competencies to emerging high-demand markets. The move leverages existing expertise in large-scale, 24/7 data center management. However, the technological shift is substantial. Bitcoin mining uses specialized, single-purpose hardware (ASICs), while AI computing relies on versatile, high-performance GPUs. The retooling process requires significant investment and technical retraining. Nevertheless, the potential rewards are compelling. Analyst projections suggest the market for AI infrastructure could dwarf the current revenue potential of pure Bitcoin mining within a few years, justifying the strategic gamble. Expert Analysis on Market Impact and Future Trajectory Financial analysts and industry observers note the long-term implications of this capital migration. “We are witnessing a fundamental re-rating of public mining stocks,” stated a senior analyst at a major investment bank. “Valuations are increasingly being driven by projections for AI revenue, not just Bitcoin production and holdings.” This shift could decouple the stock performance of these firms from direct Bitcoin price movements over time. Moreover, the large BTC sales introduce a new source of sell-side pressure on the cryptocurrency market, a factor that traders and long-term holders must now consider in their models. The timeline of this transition is crucial. Most companies announced pilot projects and partnerships in late 2024, with major capital deployment scheduled throughout 2025 and 2026. The record Q1 BTC sales likely represent the initial funding wave for these plans. Market observers will closely monitor subsequent quarterly reports for metrics like: AI Revenue Percentage: The share of total income derived from non-mining operations. Hash Rate Stability: Whether Bitcoin mining operations are maintained, scaled down, or sold off. Capital Expenditure: Ongoing investment split between mining and AI infrastructure. This evolution also raises questions about network security. If a significant portion of publicly traded hash power is redirected or monetized to fund other ventures, the Bitcoin network’s mining decentralization could be affected. However, private and geographically dispersed miners may fill any potential gaps, ensuring network resilience. Conclusion The record sale of 32,000 BTC by public Bitcoin miners in Q1 2025 marks a definitive inflection point for the industry. This strategic divestment fuels a capital-intensive pivot toward becoming AI infrastructure providers, a move driven by the pursuit of more predictable revenues and alignment with a high-growth technological frontier. While this transition presents new risks and requires massive reinvestment, it fundamentally redefines the business model of listed mining companies. The coming quarters will reveal the success of this ambitious strategy and its lasting impact on both the cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence sectors. FAQs Q1: Why did Bitcoin miners sell so much BTC in Q1 2025? Public miners sold a record 32,000 BTC primarily to raise capital for a strategic shift. They are investing heavily to build data center infrastructure for artificial intelligence computing, which requires significant upfront funding for new hardware and facility upgrades. Q2: Does this mean Bitcoin mining is no longer profitable? Not necessarily. Mining profitability fluctuates with Bitcoin’s price and energy costs. The pivot to AI is a strategic diversification to build a more stable, dual-revenue stream business model that is less dependent on crypto market cycles alone. Q3: How does selling BTC affect the Bitcoin market? Large-scale sales by major holders increase the immediate selling pressure on Bitcoin, potentially impacting its price in the short term. It also reduces the BTC held in corporate treasuries, slightly increasing the circulating supply available on the market. Q4: What is AI infrastructure, and why is it attractive to miners? AI infrastructure refers to the data centers and high-performance computing hardware (like GPUs) needed to train and run artificial intelligence models. It’s attractive because it leverages miners’ existing skills in managing large-scale, power-intensive data centers and offers contracts often paid in stable fiat currency. Q5: Will public mining companies stop mining Bitcoin entirely? Most companies have not announced plans to cease Bitcoin mining completely. The likely scenario is a hybrid model where they continue mining but allocate an increasing share of resources and capital to AI operations, with Bitcoin potentially becoming one segment of a broader tech infrastructure business. This post Record Exodus: Public Bitcoin Miners Dump 32,000 BTC in Q1 2025 to Fuel AI Ambitions first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

20 Apr 2026, 04:30

Report: NYDIG Close to Buying Alcoa’s Massena New York Smelter Site for Bitcoin Mining Operations

Alcoa Corp. is in advanced talks to sell its idled Massena East aluminum smelter site in upstate New York to NYDIG, the bitcoin mining and digital asset infrastructure firm, according to Bloomberg. Key Takeaways: According to a recent report, Alcoa is in advanced talks to sell its Massena East smelter site to NYDIG, with a

20 Apr 2026, 04:30

DeFi Fund Outflow Crisis Spreads to Solana, Devastating Kamino’s USDC Liquidity Pools

BitcoinWorld DeFi Fund Outflow Crisis Spreads to Solana, Devastating Kamino’s USDC Liquidity Pools March 25, 2025 – A severe DeFi fund outflow, initially triggered by the KelpDAO rsETH bridge security breach, has now contagiously spread to the Solana blockchain. Consequently, this migration of capital is aggressively draining the USDC liquidity pools of Kamino Finance, a leading automated market maker and liquidity protocol on Solana. Data from Wu Blockchain reveals critical stress levels, with Kamino’s Prime Market USDC pool hitting 100% utilization, effectively locking all $178 million in deposits. DeFi Fund Outflow Triggers Solana Liquidity Crisis The cryptocurrency sector faces a significant stress test as capital flight impacts multiple blockchain ecosystems. Initially, the KelpDAO incident on the Ethereum network prompted a widespread reassessment of bridge security and protocol risk. Subsequently, this cautious sentiment has cascaded onto Solana, demonstrating the interconnected nature of modern decentralized finance. Market analysts now observe a clear pattern of risk-off behavior among DeFi participants. This behavior directly pressures liquidity providers to withdraw assets from perceived higher-yield, higher-risk environments. Kamino Finance, a cornerstone of Solana’s DeFi landscape, finds itself at the epicenter of this storm. The protocol’s automated liquidity management strategies, while efficient in normal market conditions, are now facing unprecedented withdrawal requests. Furthermore, the rapid depletion of available USDC highlights a critical vulnerability in leveraged yield farming strategies during market-wide deleveraging events. Anatomy of the Kamino USDC Liquidity Drain Wu Blockchain’s report provides a granular view of the escalating situation within Kamino’s vaults. The utilization rate, a key metric showing the percentage of deposited funds currently lent out, has soared across major pools. This surge indicates that nearly all supplied capital is actively deployed, leaving minimal reserves for new withdrawals or loans. Prime Market USDC Pool: Valued at approximately $178 million, this pool has reached 100% utilization. Therefore, its available liquidity is completely exhausted. Stakehouse USDC Vault: Utilization rates have surpassed 95%, signaling extreme strain and limited capacity for further lending or withdrawals. LockawayX RWA USDC Vault: Similarly, this vault’s utilization has also climbed above the 95% threshold, indicating broad-based pressure. Simultaneously, deposit Annual Percentage Yields (APY) have spiked across these pools. Typically, rising APY acts as an incentive to attract new capital and stabilize a pool. However, in this context, it primarily reflects the heightened risk premium demanded by remaining liquidity providers as available funds vanish. Expert Analysis on Cross-Chain Contagion Financial risk analysts specializing in blockchain systems point to several amplifying factors. First, the KelpDAO hack eroded confidence in cross-chain bridge technology, a component integral to multi-chain DeFi strategies. Second, the high leverage and composability inherent in protocols like Kamino can accelerate both gains and losses. When users withdraw en masse to seek safety, these mechanisms can create a vicious cycle of liquidity lock-up. “This event is a textbook case of cross-chain contagion,” explains a veteran DeFi risk assessor who requested anonymity due to firm policy. “A shock in one ecosystem, especially one involving a fundamental piece of infrastructure like a bridge, doesn’t remain isolated. Risk models are recalculated globally, and capital flows to perceived havens, often centralized exchanges or stablecoin holdings on primary chains like Ethereum. Solana’s deep liquidity pools were an obvious next stop for this risk-rotation.” Historical Context and Systemic Implications This is not the first liquidity crisis in DeFi’s short history. Events like the collapse of Terra’s UST in 2022 and the FTX/Alameda implosion later that year also triggered massive, cross-protocol outflows. Each event has tested the resilience of automated liquidity systems. Notably, protocols have since incorporated circuit breakers, improved oracle designs, and more conservative risk parameters. Despite these improvements, the speed and scale of modern digital asset markets continue to present novel challenges. The immediate impact on Solana users is tangible. Borrowing costs on Kamino and similar platforms have skyrocketed. Additionally, users seeking to exit leveraged positions or simply withdraw USDC may face delays or inability to access funds until utilization rates decrease. This scenario can potentially trigger liquidations in other parts of the ecosystem if users cannot post required collateral. Kamino Finance Key Vault Status (Approximate) Vault Name Asset Estimated TVL Utilization Rate Prime Market USDC $178M 100% Stakehouse USDC Data Unspecified >95% LockawayX RWA USDC Data Unspecified >95% Pathways to Resolution and Market Stabilization Market stability hinges on several factors. Primarily, the resolution of the KelpDAO situation and recovery of lost funds would help restore baseline confidence. Subsequently, arbitrageurs and institutional capital may step in to supply liquidity to high-APY pools like Kamino’s, easing the utilization pressure. Protocol developers can also deploy emergency parameter adjustments, such as temporarily increasing interest rate curves to incentivize deposits or pausing certain withdrawal functions to allow for orderly unwinding. Longer-term, this event will likely spur further discussion on the need for decentralized, cross-chain risk assessment frameworks and more robust liquidity backstops. The goal for the industry remains clear: to build systems that can withstand isolated shocks without triggering widespread liquidity freezes. Conclusion The DeFi fund outflow from Ethereum to Solana underscores the fragile interdependence within the decentralized finance landscape. The devastating impact on Kamino’s USDC liquidity serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with highly utilized lending pools during periods of market stress. While the underlying technology of automated market makers is robust, its interaction with human sentiment and cross-chain risk perception remains a critical area for development. The market’s response in the coming days will be a crucial test of Solana’s DeFi maturity and the broader ecosystem’s resilience. FAQs Q1: What caused the DeFi fund outflow to Solana? The primary catalyst was the security breach and hack of the KelpDAO rsETH bridge on the Ethereum network. This event triggered a widespread risk reassessment, leading users to withdraw funds from various DeFi protocols, with the outflow eventually spreading to Solana-based platforms like Kamino Finance. Q2: What does a 100% utilization rate mean for Kamino’s USDC pool? A 100% utilization rate means that 100% of the USDC deposited into that specific liquidity pool has been borrowed by other users. Consequently, there is zero available liquidity left for new withdrawals or loans until some borrowers repay their debts or new depositors add more USDC. Q3: How does this affect ordinary users on Solana? Users looking to borrow USDC on Kamino will find it extremely expensive or impossible due to the lack of available funds. Those with existing deposits can still earn high APY, but withdrawing their funds may be delayed until liquidity returns. The high borrowing costs can also pressure leveraged positions across the ecosystem. Q4: Is Kamino Finance at risk of insolvency? High utilization does not equate to insolvency. Insolvency occurs if borrowed assets cannot be repaid. Kamino’s situation is a liquidity crunch, not necessarily a solvency crisis. The protocol’s solvency depends on the health of its borrowers’ collateral positions and the accuracy of its price oracles. Q5: Has this happened before in DeFi? Yes, similar liquidity crunches have occurred during major market stress events, such as the Terra/LUNA collapse and the FTX bankruptcy. Each event has led to high utilization rates and spiking APYs on lending platforms as users rushed to withdraw assets or deleverage their positions. This post DeFi Fund Outflow Crisis Spreads to Solana, Devastating Kamino’s USDC Liquidity Pools first appeared on BitcoinWorld .