hodler

7 May 2026, 21:10

AI agents and large corporates will lead the next stablecoin boom, executives say

Stablecoins are entering a new phase of adoption, with large corporations using them for cross-border treasury flows while AI agents begin using blockchain rails for autonomous payments, Bridge and Deus X Capital executives said at Consensus 2026.

7 May 2026, 20:30

Saudi Arabia and Kuwait reverse base restrictions, clearing path for Project Freedom restart

Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have lifted their bans on U.S. military use of their bases and airspace, removing the main obstacle to resuming Project Freedom, the American naval operation to escort commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The reversal comes just days after both Gulf states blocked U.S. access to key military infrastructure. Saudi Arabia had denied use of Prince Sultan Airbase and overflight rights, with Kuwait imposing similar restrictions shortly after. U.S. equity markets then fell in response to reports President Trump was preparing to restart the operation. BREAKING: US equity markets fall on reports that President Trump is preparing to restart “Project Freedom” in the Strait of Hormuz. pic.twitter.com/4eHu6HjsVs — The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) May 7, 2026 What triggered the Project Freedom shutdown Project Freedom launched earlier this week as a U.S.-led effort to secure the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint that handles roughly 20% of global oil trade. The operation used naval destroyers, fighter jets, helicopters, and drones to escort commercial vessels through the waterway amid escalating tensions with Iran. The initial phase worked. Two U.S.-flagged ships were guided out of the Persian Gulf under military escort. However, the operation provoked a sharp Iranian response , including cruise missile and drone strikes on U.S. warships and non-U.S. commercial vessels. Iran also hit the United Arab Emirates’ oil export terminal at Fujairah with 15 missiles , the first such strike since a fragile U.S.-Iran ceasefire had taken hold last month. Saudi Arabia then pulled its support roughly 36 hours after the launch. NBC News reported that Saudi officials were “blindsided” by the operation. A tense phone call between President Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman followed, with Riyadh citing unclear rules of engagement and the risk of Iranian retaliation against Saudi territory. Kuwait cut off airspace access shortly after, leaving the U.S. without “the defensive umbrella needed to protect ships transiting the strait.” Trump then paused the operation, framing the suspension as a diplomatic window to pursue a deal with Iran. He credited China and Pakistan for mediation efforts. What changed The specific terms that persuaded Saudi Arabia and Kuwait to reverse course have not been publicly detailed. Pentagon officials had indicated a possible restart as early as this week, with plans to guide commercial ships through a narrow, mine-cleared corridor under heavy U.S. military protection. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has described the U.S. presence as a “red, white and blue dome” over the strait. Gulf tensions run deeper than the shut strait The crisis has exposed fractures within the Gulf Cooperation Council. The UAE, frustrated by Saudi Arabia’s initial hesitation, has withdrawn from OPEC and is considering leaving the Arab League. Those moves signal disagreements among Gulf states over how to respond to Iranian aggression and U.S. military strategy in the region. A Chinese-owned oil tanker was struck near the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, with the vessel’s deck catching fire. Crew casualties have not been confirmed. China, a major buyer of Iranian oil, had previously avoided direct hits in the conflict. Saudi Arabia has also moved to reduce its own exposure to Hormuz disruptions, securing a pipeline deal to route 50% of its oil exports through the Red Sea. The timeline for the Project Freedom restart remains unclear. Markets are pricing in renewed risk, with U.S. equities having dropped on the restart reports. Any sustained disruption to Hormuz shipping lanes is expected to ripple through global energy prices. The Iranian response to a second phase of Project Freedom will determine whether the operation stabilizes shipping and energy prices or further worsens the conflict. There’s a middle ground between leaving money in the bank and rolling the dice in crypto. Start with this free video on decentralized finance .

7 May 2026, 20:17

Binance Under Pressure: US Treasury Issues Ultimatum Over $1B Iran-Linked Flows

Binance has been under heightened scrutiny in recent months over allegations that it helped facilitate illicit crypto activity tied to Iran. The latest development is that the US Treasury Department has delivered a private ultimatum to the exchange. Binance Under The Spotlight Again According to The Information, the US Treasury sent a letter to Binance in recent weeks requiring adherence to the post-2023 oversight measures. The pressure comes after investigative reporting suggested that large volumes of cryptocurrency may have flowed through Binance toward Iran-linked entities during 2024 and 2025. Estimates cited in the reporting vary, with some figures placing the total at roughly $1.7 billion. Earlier, in February, Bitcoinist reported that Senator Richard Blumenthal initiated a formal inquiry into Binance and its co-CEO, Richard Teng, tied to these allegations. Blumenthal’s letter raised concerns that the company may have enabled “large-scale violations” of US and international sanctions relating to Iran. In his message, the senator argued that Binance appeared to disregard warnings and recommendations intended to prevent Iranian money laundering schemes, pointing again to the claim that approximately $1.7 billion in transfers connected to Iran may have occurred. Cooperation Promise In response to the renewed scrutiny, Binance said it is cooperating with the independent monitor and with relevant agencies. In comments to The Block, a spokesperson for Binance said the company is providing full cooperation and transparency. Separately, the exchange acknowledged the seriousness of its previous compliance problems, stating that it is working to improve both transparency and the speed of its responses. According to The Information, Treasury Under Secretary for Terrorism Gene Lange reminded the exchange of its obligation to cooperate fully with the Treasury-imposed monitoring program. Lange’s message emphasized timely sharing of relevant data records and documents as part of the program’s requirements. Featured image created with OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

7 May 2026, 19:35

Inside OpenAI’s safety crisis: Former employees testify in Musk lawsuit

BitcoinWorld Inside OpenAI’s safety crisis: Former employees testify in Musk lawsuit Elon Musk’s legal campaign to dismantle OpenAI’s for-profit structure is forcing a rare public examination of how the company’s shift toward commercial products may have compromised its founding mission: ensuring that artificial general intelligence (AGI) benefits all of humanity. On Thursday, a federal court in Oakland heard testimony from a former employee and a former board member who described a pattern of safety lapses and governance failures inside the AI lab. Safety teams disbanded as product pressure mounted Rosie Campbell joined OpenAI’s AGI readiness team in 2021 and left in 2024 after her team was disbanded. Another safety-focused group, the Super Alignment team, was shut down during the same period. Campbell testified that when she joined, the culture was heavily research-oriented, with frequent discussions about AGI and safety. “Over time it became more like a product-focused organization,” she said. Under cross-examination, Campbell acknowledged that significant funding is necessary for building AGI, but argued that creating a super-intelligent model without adequate safety measures contradicts the mission she originally signed up for. She pointed to a specific incident where Microsoft deployed a version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 model in India through its Bing search engine before the company’s Deployment Safety Board (DSB) had evaluated it. While the model itself posed no major risk, Campbell stressed the importance of setting strong precedents. “We want to have good safety processes in place we know are being followed reliably,” she testified. Board governance under scrutiny The deployment of GPT-4 in India was one of the red flags that led OpenAI’s non-profit board to briefly fire CEO Sam Altman in November 2023. Tasha McCauley, a board member at the time, testified about concerns that Altman was not forthcoming enough for the board’s unusual structure to function effectively. She described a pattern of misleading behavior, including Altman lying to another board member about McCauley’s intention to remove a third board member, Helen Toner, who had published a white paper with implied criticism of OpenAI’s safety policies. McCauley also noted that Altman failed to inform the board about the decision to launch ChatGPT publicly, and that his disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was inadequate. “We are a non-profit board and our mandate was to be able to oversee the for-profit underneath us,” she told the court. “Our primary way to do that was being called into question. We did not have a high degree of confidence at all to trust that the information being conveyed to us allowed us to make decisions in an informed way.” When OpenAI’s staff rallied behind Altman and Microsoft worked to restore the status quo, the board reversed course, and the members opposed to Altman stepped down. This episode lies at the heart of Musk’s argument that the transformation of OpenAI from a research organization into one of the largest private companies in the world broke the implicit agreement among its founders. Expert testimony and broader implications David Schizer, a former dean of Columbia Law School who is serving as an expert witness for Musk’s team, echoed McCauley’s concerns. “OpenAI has emphasized that a key part of its mission is safety and they are going to prioritize safety over profits,” Schizer said. “Part of that is taking safety rules seriously, if something needs to be subject to safety review, it needs to happen. What matters is the process issue.” With AI already deeply embedded in for-profit companies, the implications extend far beyond a single lab. McCauley argued that the governance failures at OpenAI should be a reason to embrace stronger government regulation of advanced AI. “If it all comes down to one CEO making those decisions, and we have the public good at stake, that’s very suboptimal,” she said. Conclusion The Oakland hearing underscores a fundamental tension at OpenAI: the pressure to commercialize AI products versus the non-profit mission of ensuring safe AGI. As Musk’s lawsuit proceeds, the testimony from former employees and board members is providing an unusually detailed look at how internal safety processes and governance structures have evolved—or failed to evolve—alongside the company’s rapid growth. For regulators, investors, and the public, the case is becoming a critical test of whether corporate accountability can keep pace with AI’s accelerating capabilities. FAQs Q1: What is the central issue in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI? The lawsuit argues that OpenAI’s shift from a non-profit research organization to a for-profit commercial entity violated its founding mission of developing AGI safely for the benefit of humanity. The court is examining whether this transformation broke implicit agreements among the founders. Q2: What specific safety failures were highlighted in the testimony? Former employee Rosie Campbell testified that the company’s Deployment Safety Board was bypassed when Microsoft deployed GPT-4 in India. She also noted that two key safety teams—the AGI readiness team and the Super Alignment team—were disbanded as the company became more product-focused. Q3: How does this case affect the broader AI industry? The case is being watched closely as a potential precedent for how AI companies balance safety and profit. Witnesses have called for stronger government regulation, arguing that relying on a single CEO to make decisions affecting public safety is “suboptimal.” The outcome could influence how other AI labs structure their governance and safety processes. This post Inside OpenAI’s safety crisis: Former employees testify in Musk lawsuit first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

7 May 2026, 19:30

Tether exec: US midterms could be a watershed moment for crypto regulation

BitcoinWorld Tether exec: US midterms could be a watershed moment for crypto regulation The upcoming U.S. midterm elections could fundamentally alter the trajectory of cryptocurrency regulation, according to Jesse Spiro, Head of Government Relations at Tether. Speaking at a panel during Consensus Miami 2026, Spiro described the elections as a potential “watershed” moment for the industry, warning that recent legislative gains remain fragile and could be reversed depending on the political outcome. Recent legislative progress faces political uncertainty Spiro acknowledged that the past year has seen notable policy advancements, including the passage of the Stablecoin Regulation Act — also known as the GENIUS Act — and the CLARITY framework, which established clearer guidelines for digital asset markets. However, he cautioned that these achievements are not permanent. “The situation could always be reversed,” Spiro said, pointing to the midterms as a decisive factor that could either reinforce or dismantle the current regulatory trajectory. The midterm elections, scheduled for later this year, will determine control of both chambers of Congress. A shift in power could lead to new committee leadership, altered legislative priorities, and potential reconsideration of recently enacted crypto laws. Industry observers note that the stablecoin regulation bill, in particular, was a bipartisan effort but remains vulnerable to political recalibration. Pro-crypto political funding on the rise In anticipation of the elections, Spiro confirmed that pro-crypto advocacy groups are preparing to inject substantial political funding into key races. While he did not disclose specific figures or target districts, the statement aligns with broader industry trends. Crypto-focused political action committees have already raised tens of millions of dollars for the 2026 cycle, aiming to support candidates perceived as favorable to digital asset innovation. This coordinated effort reflects a growing recognition within the crypto sector that regulatory outcomes are increasingly tied to electoral results. Unlike previous cycles where the industry’s political engagement was fragmented, the current push is more strategic and better funded. What this means for investors and the broader market For market participants, the midterms introduce a layer of political risk that could influence asset prices, exchange operations, and institutional adoption. A continued pro-crypto majority in Congress could accelerate the development of a comprehensive federal framework, potentially reducing the patchwork of state-level regulations. Conversely, a shift toward more skeptical leadership could slow or reverse progress, creating uncertainty for businesses planning long-term investments. The outcome may also affect the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement posture and the Federal Reserve’s approach to digital dollar initiatives. Spiro’s remarks underscore that the regulatory environment is not static — it is shaped by electoral dynamics that can change rapidly. Conclusion Tether’s warning serves as a reminder that crypto policy in the United States is at a crossroads. The midterm elections represent more than a routine political cycle; they are a potential inflection point for an industry still navigating its relationship with regulators. Whether the next Congress builds on recent laws or reopens old debates will depend on who voters send to Washington. FAQs Q1: What is the GENIUS Act? The GENIUS Act is the Stablecoin Regulation Act passed in 2025, establishing federal oversight and reserve requirements for stablecoin issuers in the U.S. Q2: How could the midterms affect crypto regulation? A change in congressional control could lead to new committee chairs, altered legislative priorities, and potential revisions or repeals of recently enacted crypto laws. Q3: Why is Tether involved in political discussions? As the largest stablecoin issuer, Tether has a direct interest in regulatory clarity. Its government relations team monitors and engages with policy developments that affect stablecoin operations and broader digital asset markets. This post Tether exec: US midterms could be a watershed moment for crypto regulation first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

7 May 2026, 18:55

Meta receives a letter from Senator Elizabeth Warren over its stablecoin plan

Meta (NASDAQ: META) is under fire again with Senator Elizabeth Warren as the company plans to roll out stablecoin features to its billions of users. Senator Warren shared her concerns that Meta’s stablecoin ambitions are a threat to financial security. She has also been vocal about her criticism of the Trump administration’s involvement in the crypto industry. Why is Elizabeth Warren probing Meta? Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is back on the trail of Meta and Mark Zuckerberg, just one week after the company quietly revived its long-dormant plans to integrate stablecoin payments into Facebook. The Senator wrote a letter demanding answers, citing a “lack of transparency” and warning of “serious implications” for the U.S. financial system. Warren has been campaigning against Big Tech monopolies and what she calls “unchecked corporate greed,” particularly with the involvement of the current Trump administration. Last week, Meta rolled out a pilot program allowing a select group of creators in Colombia and the Philippines to receive payments in USDC, unlike its failed 2019 attempt when it tried to create its own currency (Libra/Diem). The program currently uses the Solana and Polygon blockchains to process the payments. Reports suggest Meta expects to expand this payment option to more than 160 countries by the end of 2026. In response to Warren’s letter, a Meta spokesperson explicitly told Fortune that there is no Meta stablecoin, but the company wants its users, whether individuals or businesses, to be able to pay the way they want, “which may include through a third-party stablecoin.” What is Senator Warren’s objection? In her letter, Warren stated that stablecoin activity on Meta, which has a global user base of billions, could have “serious implications for competition, privacy, the integrity of our payments system, and financial stability.” The Senator is specifically worried about a repeat of the 2023 banking crisis, where USDC briefly lost its dollar peg, trading as low as $0.88, after Silicon Valley Bank collapsed. Furthermore, Warren is demanding answers regarding where Meta fits into the CLARITY Act currently being debated by Congress. Cryptopolitan reported that Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.) hopes to bring the bill to a markup this month. Senator Warren is simultaneously conducting a separate but related investigation into the company’s employment practices. On March 16, 2026, she sent letters to the CEOs of not only Meta, but also Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Home Depot (NYSE: HD), Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), Nike (NYSE: NKE), Target (NYSE: TGT), UPS (NYSE: UPS), and Verizon (NYSE: VZ), questioning the mass layoffs occurring despite the fact that these companies have been posting massive profits and receiving huge tax breaks from President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill.” Warner pointed out that Amazon announced plans to cut approximately 16,000 workers despite a 44.5% profit increase in 2025 and an 87% tax cut. About 15,000 Microsoft employees were also laid off despite the company having a net income of over $101 billion in 2025 and anticipating a $12.5 billion tax cut. Senator Warren is currently pushing the CLEAN Mergers Act, which was introduced with Senator Cory Booker in late April 2026, to dissolve corporate mergers approved during Trump’s term that are valued over $10 billion if they hurt competition. Following reports that the Trump-backed drone company Powerus obtained an Air Force contract, Warren is questioning why firms tied to Donald Trump Jr. (via 1789 Capital) have won over $70 million in Defense contracts since 2025. She recently pressed the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth regarding allegations of insider trading related to betting markets during the Iran War. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .