hodler

27 Mar 2026, 00:00

Gamestop Bitcoin Strategy: Company Used BTC Holdings for Covered Calls, SEC Filing Shows

Gamestop disclosed in its fiscal 2025 annual report that it pledged 4,709 of its 4,710 bitcoin holdings as collateral with Coinbase Credit to run a covered-call options strategy, confirming the company held its position rather than selling. Gamestop Fiscal 2025 Annual Report The Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2026, covers the

26 Mar 2026, 22:10

Coinbase is pushing US lawmakers to reform crypto tax rules, calling current laws outdated

Coinbase and its top executives have always been seeking clarity from US watchdogs on the use of crypto. In a fresh move, the exchange is ramping up pressure on US lawmakers to revamp how digital assets are taxed. They are arguing that current rules are stuck in a pre-crypto era, which is hampering adoption. Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase’s CPO, believes that a basic mismatch might be a blockage here. The US tax code was designed for “20th-century money,” while crypto operates in an entirely different way. However, treating crypto purely as “property” means that even the smallest transactions can trigger tax obligations. This will lead to a system where everyday usage is a compliance headache. Coinbase sees 34% jump in tax queries Shirzad mentioned that under the current rules, something as simple as paying a gas fee or using a stablecoin for a routine transaction is technically a taxable event. He added that the users are expected to calculate cost basis, track gains or losses, and report them. This happens even when the amounts involved are negligible. He noted that crypto’s ability to move seamlessly across wallets and platforms makes this even harder. It often leaves gaps in reporting that brokers themselves cannot fully resolve. According to a report , Coinbase has seen a 34% jump in customer service inquiries. All of them were linked to tax reporting compared with the same period last year. Meanwhile, the introduction of new reporting needs is generating what the company describes as a paperwork overload. It added that millions of Form 1099-DAs will be issued for the 2025 tax year. However, many of them are tied to extremely small transactions. A big portion of these forms relates to proceeds under $600, and hundreds of thousands even track activity below $1. The volume of reporting risks is doing the opposite. It is not improving the clarity among users and is burying meaningful info under huge amounts of data. Cost basis tracking is another structural issue among users. The exchange estimates that more than 63% of users have gaps in their records. This is purely due to crypto’s move between wallets and exchanges. Because of this, taxpayers either overpay or are forced to manually reconcile transactions, and that too with limited support. De minimis exemption for small transactions might work here. Similar limits already exist in other parts of the tax code. It can be applied to crypto to eliminate the need to report minor payments. Euro stablecoin holders jump to 1M The report highlighted that the GENIUS Act has already established a clearer framework for stablecoins and the market. Meanwhile, the Internal Revenue Code remains largely unchanged for cryptos. The cumulative digital assets market is hovering around the $2.4 trillion mark. A recent sell-off has dragged Bitcoin to trade below the $70k level. It is expected that the tax rules could push users and innovation offshore. The company framed the issue not just as a compliance challenge, but as a competitiveness one. It warns the US of losing ground in a sector that it is trying to lead. Data shared by Dune shows that Euro-pegged stablecoin supply has surged from $203 million in January 2023 to $912 million by February 2026. Holders grew from 13,000 to over 1 million during this period. Circle’s EURC leads this tally with $500 million. However, there are 13 euro-pegged stablecoins in the market. This includes EURS, EURe, EURI, EURCV, and more. Euro stablecoins: $203M → $912M supply. 13K → 1M+ holders. @circle EURC leads at $500M, but there are 13 euro-pegged stablecoins across the ecosystem — EURS, EURe, EURI, EURCV, and more. Post-MiCA, the euro stablecoin market is growing and fragmenting into specialized… pic.twitter.com/IBzxDSkyzI — Dune | We Are Hiring! (@Dune) March 26, 2026 Post-MiCA regulatory clarity has pushed this 4.5x supply and 80x holder growth. Euro stablecoins now represent over 80% of the non-USD stablecoin supply in the region. The cumulative stablecoin market holds a cap of more than $319 billion. Tether’s USDT leads the sector with an over $184 billion market cap. Beyond policy, Coinbase entered traditional finance with crypto. The company recently partnered with Better Home & Finance to allow homebuyers to use digital assets like Bitcoin and USDC as collateral for down payments. Despite the major announcement, the COIN price dropped by more than 4% in the last session. It has seen a decline of almost 45% over the last 6 months. COIN traded at $173.38 in the last session. There’s a middle ground between leaving money in the bank and rolling the dice in crypto. Start with this free video on decentralized finance .

26 Mar 2026, 21:40

Trump Iran Attack Halt: A Stunning Claim of Diplomatic Request from Tehran

BitcoinWorld Trump Iran Attack Halt: A Stunning Claim of Diplomatic Request from Tehran WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a development that sent immediate ripples through global diplomatic and security circles, former U.S. President Donald Trump asserted that a planned military strike against Iranian energy infrastructure was paused following a direct request from Tehran. This claim, first reported by Walter Bloomberg, introduces a complex new layer to the already volatile U.S.-Iran relationship and raises critical questions about back-channel communications and crisis management. Trump Iran Attack Halt: The Core Claim According to the report, President Trump stated the decision to temporarily halt an offensive operation targeting Iranian energy facilities came specifically at Iran’s request. This statement suggests a moment of potential de-escalation initiated by Tehran during a period of heightened military readiness. The nature and timing of this alleged request remain pivotal details. Furthermore, the specific energy facilities in question are significant. Iran’s energy sector is a cornerstone of its economy and a frequent target in geopolitical strategy. Consequently, an attack on these assets would represent a severe economic and symbolic blow. This incident did not occur in a vacuum. It fits within a well-documented pattern of escalating tensions between the two nations. For context, recent years have seen a series of confrontations, including tanker seizures, drone shootdowns, and attacks on oil infrastructure. The table below outlines key recent flashpoints: Date Event Location 2019 Attack on Saudi Aramco facilities Abqaiq, Saudi Arabia 2020 U.S. drone strike killing Qasem Soleimani Baghdad, Iraq 2021 Iranian seizure of oil tankers Strait of Hormuz Analyzing the Diplomatic Backdrop The claim of an Iranian request for a halt is diplomatically significant. Typically, such a move could indicate a desire to avoid immediate, catastrophic conflict. Experts point to several possible motivations for Tehran. First, Iran might seek to avoid a massive military retaliation that could cripple its infrastructure. Second, internal political calculations within the Iranian leadership could favor temporary restraint. Finally, international pressure from allies or trading partners might have influenced the decision. Expert Perspectives on Crisis Communication Dr. Anya Petrova, a senior fellow at the Center for International Security, notes that such back-channel requests, if verified, are a standard but critical tool in high-stakes diplomacy. “In moments of extreme tension, direct communication lines, however informal, are essential to prevent miscalculation,” Petrova explained. “A request to halt an attack, even temporarily, creates a window for dialogue and de-escalation that both sides can use to reassess their positions.” This analysis underscores the procedural importance of the claim, regardless of the ultimate strategic outcome. The immediate impact of this reported halt is multifaceted. For regional security, it potentially averted a significant escalation that could have drawn in neighboring states. For global energy markets, the stabilization of a key oil-producing region was likely preserved, preventing a spike in prices. The political ramifications are equally complex. The claim allows the Trump administration to frame itself as both decisive and responsive to diplomatic overtures. Military and Strategic Implications From a military standpoint, the halt of a prepared operation involves considerable logistical and command decisions. Forces are positioned, assets are allocated, and timing is synchronized. A pause, therefore, is not a simple reversal but a deliberate recalibration. The U.S. military maintains robust contingency plans for the Persian Gulf region. Key assets typically involved in such scenarios include: Carrier Strike Groups: Projecting air power and naval dominance. Long-Range Bombers: Capable of striking hardened targets. Cyber Operations Units: For targeting digital infrastructure. This event also interacts with the broader framework of international agreements. The unraveling of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, created a vacuum of formal diplomatic engagement. Consequently, incidents like the reported attack halt become the primary mechanism for managing the relationship, increasing the risk of misunderstanding. Conclusion The claim by former President Trump regarding a Trump Iran attack halt at Tehran’s request represents a critical data point in understanding modern U.S.-Iran relations. It highlights the persistent danger of conflict, the fragile mechanisms for de-escalation, and the profound consequences for Middle Eastern stability and global energy security. While the full verification of the event’s details may require further historical analysis, its reporting underscores the continuous, high-stakes diplomacy that operates behind the headlines of international news. The episode serves as a stark reminder of how quickly tensions can escalate and how vital clear communication channels remain in preventing a wider war. FAQs Q1: What exactly did President Trump claim about the Iran attack? President Trump stated that a temporary halt to a U.S. military attack on Iranian energy facilities was initiated following a request from Tehran itself, as reported by Walter Bloomberg. Q2: Why are Iranian energy facilities a significant target? Iran’s energy sector is the lifeblood of its economy, providing a major portion of government revenue. Targeting it is a strategy to apply maximum economic and strategic pressure on the Iranian regime. Q3: How does this claim fit into recent U.S.-Iran tensions? This incident is part of a prolonged cycle of escalation that has included drone strikes, tanker seizures, and the collapse of the nuclear deal, keeping the region in a state of persistent volatility. Q4: What are the potential global impacts of an attack on Iranian energy sites? Such an attack could disrupt global oil supplies, spike energy prices, trigger regional conflict, and destabilize international shipping lanes like the Strait of Hormuz. Q5: Has Iran officially commented on this reported request? As of this reporting, there has been no official public confirmation or denial from the Iranian government regarding the alleged request to halt the U.S. attack, which is a common diplomatic posture in such sensitive matters. This post Trump Iran Attack Halt: A Stunning Claim of Diplomatic Request from Tehran first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

26 Mar 2026, 21:29

Trump Policy Has Crypto Privacy Developers in a 'Very Bad State', Says Coin Center

The Trump DOJ has said it won't prosecute crypto software developers. But it's doing so anyway, and getting "binding legal clarity" is a major concern, says Coin Center's executive director.

26 Mar 2026, 21:15

Twenty One Capital Surges to Become Second-Largest Public Bitcoin Holder in Strategic Market Shift

BitcoinWorld Twenty One Capital Surges to Become Second-Largest Public Bitcoin Holder in Strategic Market Shift In a significant development for cryptocurrency markets, Bitcoin investment firm Twenty One Capital has dramatically ascended to become the second-largest holder of Bitcoin among all publicly traded companies globally. This strategic shift occurred following MARA Holdings’ decision to sell a substantial portion of its Bitcoin treasury. The transaction, confirmed by multiple financial reports, represents one of the most notable corporate Bitcoin portfolio adjustments of 2025. Twenty One Capital’s Monumental Bitcoin Accumulation Twenty One Capital now controls an impressive 43,514 Bitcoin, according to verified blockchain data and corporate disclosures. At current market valuations, this holding represents approximately $2.9 billion in digital asset exposure. Consequently, the firm has established itself as a dominant institutional player in the cryptocurrency space. This accumulation reflects a deliberate, long-term investment strategy focused on Bitcoin’s store-of-value properties. The firm’s ascent follows MARA Holdings’ strategic divestment of 15,000 Bitcoin from its corporate treasury. MARA executed this sale specifically to fund the early redemption of its convertible notes, demonstrating a different approach to corporate finance management. Meanwhile, Twenty One Capital’s contrasting strategy of accumulation highlights the diverse methodologies companies employ regarding digital assets. The Landscape of Public Corporate Bitcoin Holdings The corporate Bitcoin landscape features several prominent institutional holders with varying strategies. Strategy maintains its position as the undisputed leader with 762,099 Bitcoin, representing a treasury reserve strategy initiated years earlier. Other significant holders include MicroStrategy, Tesla, and various publicly traded mining companies. Each entity approaches Bitcoin allocation with distinct financial objectives and risk tolerances. Key factors driving corporate Bitcoin adoption include: Inflation hedging against currency devaluation Portfolio diversification beyond traditional assets Long-term capital appreciation potential Technological innovation alignment Financial analysts note that corporate Bitcoin strategies generally fall into two categories: treasury reserve assets and operational holdings. Twenty One Capital clearly positions itself in the former category, treating Bitcoin as a primary balance sheet asset rather than a transactional currency. Expert Analysis of Institutional Bitcoin Trends Market analysts emphasize that Twenty One Capital’s position reflects broader institutional adoption trends. “Corporate Bitcoin accumulation signals growing mainstream acceptance of digital assets as legitimate reserve assets,” notes financial strategist Michael Chen of Digital Asset Advisors. “Furthermore, public companies now face increasing investor pressure to disclose and justify their cryptocurrency strategies.” Regulatory developments in 2024 and 2025 have created clearer frameworks for corporate digital asset holdings. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s updated accounting standards now require fair value measurement for cryptocurrency holdings. This regulatory clarity has reduced accounting uncertainty for companies like Twenty One Capital. Comparative Analysis of Major Bitcoin Holders The following table illustrates the current landscape of significant public corporate Bitcoin holders as of Q1 2025: Company Bitcoin Holdings Approximate Value Acquisition Strategy Strategy 762,099 BTC $51.8 billion Treasury Reserve Twenty One Capital 43,514 BTC $2.9 billion Investment Portfolio MicroStrategy ~190,000 BTC $12.9 billion Primary Treasury Asset MARA Holdings (post-sale) ~25,000 BTC $1.7 billion Mixed Treasury/Operational This comparative data reveals the substantial scale differences between market leaders and newer entrants. However, Twenty One Capital’s rapid ascent demonstrates how quickly positions can shift in this evolving asset class. Market Impact and Future Implications The transaction between MARA Holdings and Twenty One Capital occurred through over-the-counter (OTC) desks, minimizing direct market impact. OTC transactions allow large Bitcoin transfers without affecting public exchange order books. This method has become standard practice for institutional-scale cryptocurrency transactions exceeding $10 million. Market observers anticipate several potential consequences from this portfolio rebalancing. First, increased transparency around corporate Bitcoin strategies may encourage more institutional adoption. Second, the transaction validates Bitcoin’s liquidity for large-scale corporate finance operations. Third, it demonstrates sophisticated risk management approaches to digital asset portfolios. Looking forward, analysts predict several developments. More public companies will likely establish clear Bitcoin allocation policies. Additionally, specialized financial products for corporate cryptocurrency management will continue evolving. Finally, regulatory frameworks will probably become more standardized across major jurisdictions. The Technical Infrastructure Behind Large Holdings Securing substantial Bitcoin reserves requires sophisticated technical infrastructure. Companies like Twenty One Capital typically employ multi-signature wallets, distributed key management, and institutional-grade custody solutions. These security measures protect against both external threats and internal vulnerabilities. Furthermore, regular third-party audits verify both existence and control of reported holdings. Insurance coverage for digital assets has also matured significantly. Specialized insurers now offer policies covering theft, loss, and certain types of fraud. This insurance market development has reduced one major barrier to large-scale corporate adoption. Conclusion Twenty One Capital’s emergence as the second-largest public Bitcoin holder marks a pivotal moment in institutional cryptocurrency adoption. The firm’s strategic accumulation of 43,514 Bitcoin demonstrates growing corporate confidence in digital assets as long-term value stores. This development, following MARA Holdings’ divestment, highlights the dynamic nature of corporate treasury management in the digital age. As regulatory clarity improves and infrastructure matures, more public companies will likely establish substantial Bitcoin positions. Consequently, the landscape of corporate digital asset holdings will continue evolving throughout 2025 and beyond. FAQs Q1: How did Twenty One Capital acquire its Bitcoin holdings? Twenty One Capital accumulated Bitcoin through a combination of direct purchases on cryptocurrency exchanges and over-the-counter (OTC) transactions. The firm’s most recent significant acquisition came from purchasing 15,000 Bitcoin from MARA Holdings in a private OTC transaction. Q2: What is the difference between public and private Bitcoin holders? Public Bitcoin holders are companies that disclose their cryptocurrency holdings through regulatory filings like SEC reports. Private holders include individuals, private companies, and anonymous addresses that don’t have public reporting requirements. Transparency levels differ significantly between these categories. Q3: Why did MARA Holdings sell 15,000 Bitcoin? MARA Holdings sold 15,000 Bitcoin specifically to fund the early redemption of its convertible notes. This strategic decision allowed the company to reduce debt obligations and potentially strengthen its balance sheet, demonstrating an alternative approach to corporate Bitcoin utilization. Q4: How do companies securely store large Bitcoin holdings? Companies typically use institutional-grade custody solutions featuring multi-signature wallets, hardware security modules, geographic key distribution, and regular third-party audits. Many combine self-custody with insured custodial services to balance security and risk management. Q5: What accounting standards apply to corporate Bitcoin holdings? As of 2025, public companies generally follow Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) guidelines requiring fair value measurement for cryptocurrency holdings. These standards mandate regular mark-to-market accounting with value changes flowing through income statements, providing greater transparency to investors. This post Twenty One Capital Surges to Become Second-Largest Public Bitcoin Holder in Strategic Market Shift first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

26 Mar 2026, 21:10

Trump Announces Crucial 10-Day Ceasefire on Iranian Power Plant Attacks

BitcoinWorld Trump Announces Crucial 10-Day Ceasefire on Iranian Power Plant Attacks WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a significant diplomatic development, President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that the United States will halt attacks on Iranian power plants for ten days, responding directly to requests from Tehran amid what he described as productive negotiations. This announcement marks a notable shift in the ongoing tensions between the two nations and represents a potential opening for diplomatic resolution regarding Iran’s energy infrastructure. Trump’s Announcement on Iranian Power Plants President Trump made the declaration during a press briefing at the White House, specifying that the cessation of attacks would continue until 12:00 a.m. UTC on April 7. The president emphasized that this decision came at the explicit request of the Iranian government, suggesting a channel of communication remains open between the adversarial nations. Furthermore, Trump characterized the current negotiations as proceeding “very smoothly,” directly contradicting what he labeled as false media reports about the state of discussions. This development follows months of escalating tensions centered on Iran’s nuclear program and regional activities. Energy infrastructure has become a focal point in this conflict, with power plants representing both civilian necessities and potential dual-use facilities. The temporary halt indicates both sides may be seeking to de-escalate while maintaining their core positions. Historical Context of US-Iran Energy Conflicts The relationship between the United States and Iran has experienced numerous fluctuations since the 1979 Iranian Revolution. Energy infrastructure has frequently emerged as a point of contention, particularly as Iran has developed its nuclear energy capabilities. Previous administrations have employed various strategies, from comprehensive sanctions to targeted actions, to influence Iranian behavior regarding its energy sector. Recent years have seen increased focus on Iran’s electrical grid and power generation facilities. These targets hold strategic importance because they support both civilian populations and industrial activities, including those related to uranium enrichment. The current ten-day pause represents the first publicly acknowledged ceasefire specifically targeting energy infrastructure in recent conflict cycles. Expert Analysis of the Ceasefire Implications Geopolitical analysts note several important dimensions to this announcement. First, the time-limited nature of the ceasefire creates immediate pressure for negotiation progress. Second, by focusing specifically on power plants, both nations acknowledge the humanitarian implications of energy infrastructure attacks while maintaining other potential pressure points. Third, the public nature of the announcement suggests both sides seek to manage domestic and international perceptions of the conflict. Energy security experts emphasize that power plant operations affect millions of Iranian civilians. Attacks on such infrastructure can cause widespread disruption beyond military or nuclear facilities. The temporary halt may allow for essential maintenance and fuel resupply, potentially preventing humanitarian crises while negotiations proceed. Media Reports Versus Official Statements President Trump’s criticism of media reporting highlights the information environment surrounding US-Iran relations. Multiple outlets have reported on the tensions with varying emphasis on military, diplomatic, and economic aspects. The administration’s direct contradiction of these reports suggests either genuine progress not captured by journalists or strategic messaging to shape negotiation dynamics. Key differences between official statements and media reports include: Timeline perceptions: Some reports suggested imminent escalation, while officials describe ongoing dialogue Negotiation substance: Media often focuses on obstacles, while Trump emphasizes smooth progress Humanitarian considerations: Coverage varies in attention to civilian infrastructure impacts Potential Outcomes and Regional Impacts The ten-day window allows for several possible developments. Successful negotiations could lead to extended ceasefires or confidence-building measures. Alternatively, failure to reach agreement might result in resumed hostilities with potentially intensified actions. Regional actors, including Gulf states and European powers, will closely monitor these developments given their interests in Middle Eastern stability and energy markets. Iran’s regional proxies and partners may adjust their postures based on perceived US flexibility or resolve. Similarly, international energy markets might experience volatility depending on perceptions of conflict escalation or resolution. The specific focus on power plants acknowledges both strategic and humanitarian dimensions, potentially creating space for creative diplomatic solutions. Technical Aspects of Power Plant Vulnerabilities Modern power plants incorporate complex systems requiring continuous operation for safety and functionality. Attacks on such infrastructure can cause cascading failures beyond immediate damage. The ceasefire period may allow Iranian technicians to address vulnerabilities or implement protective measures. Conversely, it might provide intelligence opportunities regarding plant operations and security postures. Different types of power plants present distinct considerations: Plant Type Strategic Significance Humanitarian Impact Nuclear Facilities Potential dual-use for weapons program Radiation risks if damaged Fossil Fuel Plants Energy independence and economic function Electricity for hospitals and homes Hydroelectric Dams Water management and regional control Flood risks and agricultural effects Conclusion President Trump’s announcement of a ten-day halt to attacks on Iranian power plants represents a significant diplomatic opening in longstanding tensions. The decision, made at Iran’s request and accompanied by positive characterization of negotiations, suggests potential progress toward de-escalation. However, the time-limited nature maintains pressure for concrete results. This development regarding Iranian power plants will likely influence regional dynamics, humanitarian conditions, and international perceptions of US-Iran relations in the coming critical period. FAQs Q1: What exactly did President Trump announce regarding Iran? President Trump announced that the United States will halt attacks on Iranian power plants for ten days, until 12:00 a.m. UTC on April 7, following a request from the Iranian government. Q2: Why are power plants specifically mentioned in this ceasefire? Power plants represent critical infrastructure with both strategic military value and essential civilian functions. They have been points of contention in US-Iran tensions, and their protection during negotiations addresses humanitarian concerns while maintaining diplomatic pressure. Q3: What does Trump mean by “false reports from the media”? The president suggested that media coverage has inaccurately portrayed the state of negotiations with Iran, which he claims are proceeding “very smoothly” despite reports suggesting difficulties or imminent escalation. Q4: How might this temporary ceasefire affect Iranian civilians? The halt in attacks on power plants could prevent electricity disruptions affecting hospitals, water systems, homes, and businesses. It may allow for maintenance and resupply of energy facilities serving civilian populations. Q5: What happens after the ten-day period ends on April 7? The situation will depend on negotiation progress during the ceasefire period. Options include extending the halt, reaching a broader agreement, or resuming attacks if discussions prove unsuccessful. This post Trump Announces Crucial 10-Day Ceasefire on Iranian Power Plant Attacks first appeared on BitcoinWorld .