Invest ideasNews
17 Apr 2026, 10:13
Bitcoin Breaks Above $75K, But Bears Refuse To Blink
Bitcoin has reclaimed and held above the $75,000 region after the latest rebound, but derivatives data shows the recovery lacks broad conviction. Bitcoin In The Middle Of A Credibility Problem Bloomberg claims Bitcoin has a credibility problem right now. Funding rates on perpetual futures have stayed negative for around a month and a half, meaning leveraged traders are still paying to stay short even as spot grinds higher. This divide ranks among the largest this year between spot price action and how derivatives traders are positioned. Bitcoin has climbed about 14% off its April lows, helped by renewed inflows into US‑listed ETFs and fresh accumulation by Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin treasury firm, MicroStrategy. Related Reading: Hyperliquid’s HIP‑3 Open Interest Skyrockets— Is 24/7 Tokenized Equity About To Rewrite Wall Street? Such a gap between positioning and price rarely lasts long, and it usually ends brutally for someone. When Bitcoin keeps grinding higher, traders shorting the move rack up losses and can be forced to rush in and buy back their positions, driving an abrupt, self‑reinforcing spike known as a short squeeze. The longer this standoff drags on, the more violent that eventual reversal can become. BTC OI-Weighted Funding Rate. Source: Bloomberg. The data brought by Bloomberg shows that net flows into US‑listed spot Bitcoin ETFs have hit about $332 million so far this week, with roughly $26 million added on Thursday alone. By 8 a.m. in London on Friday, Bitcoin was changing hands near the $75,000 mark. This has been one of the longest bearish funding streaks since the post‑FTX capitulation period in late 2022, when sentiment was similarly washed‑out. A Short-Squeeze Risk Vetle Lunde, head of research at K33, told Bloomberg that “Traders are actively building short positions and betting against a breakout, creating conditions where a short squeeze becomes more likely if upward momentum persists”. The current structure looks like a textbook squeeze setup. Negative funding shows that short sellers still dominate leverage and are paying to stay in the trade, even as Bitcoin grinds higher. That slow grind means many of those shorts are already underwater but haven’t capitulated yet, leaving them vulnerable. At the same time, spot liquidity looks thin, so any sharp move can quickly ripple through derivatives and turn into a fast, cascading squeeze. Bloomberg explains that the short-heavy backdrop looks even more fragile given the wave of bullish catalysts hitting the market at the same time, any one of which could spark the kind of upside jolt that forces bears to scramble out of their positions. A Soft Recovery For Bitcoin? MicroStrategy has disclosed two purchases worth a combined $2.6 billion in just the past two weeks, a steady bid that FalconX senior derivatives trader Bohan Jiang says has helped support prices. On top of that, Charles Schwab has unveiled plans to roll out spot crypto trading this year and floated the idea that clients could dedicate up to 8.8% of their portfolios to Bitcoin. This signals just how much fresh demand could still be waiting in the wings. Over the past week alone, US‑listed Bitcoin ETFs have pulled in more than $800 million, flipping from the outflows seen earlier in the year to strong net demand. Every new leg of ETF buying pushes prices higher and makes it more expensive for short sellers to sit in losing trades, ratcheting up the squeeze pressure that has been quietly building in the derivatives market for weeks. Related Reading: Bitcoin Derivatives Are The Earliest Signal Of A Quantum Selloff: Joshua Lim According to Bloomberg, bearish traders could still come out ahead if this latest bounce ultimately breaks down. Deribit data shows options desks paying up for downside protection, with notable open interest clustered in put contracts around the $60,000 and $50,000 strikes. They called this a soft recovery. Laurens Fraussen, research analyst at Kaiko, believes that Bitcoin might see rally that is sure to “catch some people off guard”. Fraussen claims that a break above $76,000 could see BTC extend toward $85,000. At the moment of writing, BTC trades for almost $76k on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview. Cover image from Perplexity. BTCUSDT chart from Tradingview.
17 Apr 2026, 10:00
Charles Schwab’s Crypto Plan In Stages—Major Platform Details Announced
Charles Schwab has shared more specifics about its upcoming “Schwab Crypto” platform, giving eligible customers a path to buy and sell bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) directly. Schwab Crypto’s Roadmap At launch, Schwab Crypto will offer direct trading in Bitcoin and Ethereum, which the firm says together account for roughly three-quarters of total crypto market capitalization. However, Schwab indicated that it intends to add additional cryptocurrencies to the platform in the future. The firm also plans to introduce transfer capabilities for deposits and withdrawals, so clients with digital asset holdings elsewhere can bring their investments into Schwab alongside their other accounts. Schwab also plans to lean heavily on its research and investor education approach. That includes digital assets learning materials powered by the Schwab Center for Financial Research, along with crypto-focused content delivered through Schwab Coaching. The goal, according to the company, is to help investors better understand how digital assets work and how they may fit into a broader investing strategy rather than treating crypto as a separate world. Cost is also positioned as a selling point. Schwab says pricing will be among the lowest in the industry, charging 75 basis points on the dollar value of each trade. Paxos For Sub-Custody And Trade Execution Joe Vietri, Head of Digital Assets at Charles Schwab, said the firm aims to give investors access to well-known cryptocurrencies through an “all-in-one investing and banking experience,” supported by education and the operational backing of Schwab’s ecosystem . Vietri framed the approach as catering to two groups at once: people who are new to crypto and want to use a trusted institution, and investors who already own digital assets and want to manage them with more confidence and convenience. Jonathan Craig, Head of Retail Investing at Charles Schwab, added that Schwab Crypto is meant to be a destination for retail customers who want direct exposure to the asset class while still benefiting from the service, educational resources, and research tools they expect from Schwab. Schwab also outlined how the arrangement will work operationally. The company says Schwab clients will maintain a separate crypto account under Schwab Crypto, which is offered by Charles Schwab Premier Bank, CSPB, and will be linked directly to their brokerage accounts. CSPB will act as custodian for clients’ digital assets, handling safekeeping and record-keeping. For sub-custody and trade execution, Schwab selected Paxos, a blockchain infrastructure provider regulated in the country. Schwab says Paxos will deliver these services using a federally overseen trust model and enterprise-grade technology, enabling financial institutions to provide digital asset solutions. At the time of writing, Bitcoin, the market’s leading crypto, was trading at around $74,900. This represents a 4.5% surge in the weekly time frame. However, this surge has been halted at the $76,000 resistance level, which is the largest obstacle for BTC in the near term. Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com
17 Apr 2026, 08:30
Oil Price Shock: Why Today’s Crisis Pales Against 1970s Nightmare – Commerzbank Reveals
BitcoinWorld Oil Price Shock: Why Today’s Crisis Pales Against 1970s Nightmare – Commerzbank Reveals FRANKFURT, March 2025 – Global energy markets face another oil price shock, yet Commerzbank’s comprehensive analysis reveals a crucial distinction: today’s volatility creates far less economic damage than the devastating 1970s crisis that reshaped the world economy. Oil Price Shock Comparison: 1970s Versus Today Commerzbank economists recently published detailed research comparing current market conditions with historical data. Their analysis examines multiple dimensions beyond simple price movements. The 1973 oil embargo triggered a 300% price increase within months. Similarly, the 1979 Iranian Revolution caused prices to double. Today’s shocks, while significant, demonstrate different characteristics and impacts. Modern economies show remarkable resilience through several structural changes. Energy efficiency improvements since the 1970s are substantial. The global economy now uses 60% less oil per unit of GDP than in 1973. This fundamental shift reduces vulnerability to price spikes. Additionally, strategic petroleum reserves provide buffer capacity that didn’t exist fifty years ago. Economic Resilience and Structural Changes Commerzbank’s research highlights four key structural differences. First, the service sector dominates advanced economies today. Manufacturing represented 25% of U.S. GDP in 1973 but now accounts for just 11%. Services require less direct energy input than heavy industry. Consequently, oil price increases transmit differently through economic systems. Second, monetary policy frameworks have evolved dramatically. The 1970s featured accommodative policies that fueled inflation. Today, central banks maintain clear inflation targets and independent mandates. They respond more aggressively to price pressures. This prevents the wage-price spirals that characterized the earlier crisis. Third, energy diversification has progressed significantly. Renewable sources now supply over 30% of electricity in many developed nations. Natural gas has replaced oil in numerous applications. These alternatives provide flexibility during supply disruptions. The global energy mix is simply more diverse and resilient. Expert Analysis from Commerzbank’s Research Team Dr. Ulrich Leuchtmann, Head of Commodity Research at Commerzbank, explains the methodology. “We examined not just price levels but economic transmission mechanisms. Our models analyze how oil price changes affect inflation, growth, and employment across different eras. The results consistently show reduced sensitivity.” The research team created detailed comparisons using inflation-adjusted data. They normalized for economic size and structure. Their findings reveal that a 50% oil price increase today creates approximately one-third the GDP impact of an equivalent 1970s shock. This represents substantial progress in economic resilience. Market Mechanisms and Policy Responses Financial market development plays a crucial role. Modern derivatives markets allow companies to hedge price risk effectively. Airlines, manufacturers, and transportation firms routinely use futures contracts. These instruments were largely unavailable during the 1970s crises. Hedging reduces volatility transmission to consumer prices. Government policies have also adapted. Many nations implemented automatic stabilizers since the 1970s. Unemployment insurance, tax adjustments, and social programs cushion economic impacts. These mechanisms were less developed during earlier crises. Policy responses are now more sophisticated and data-driven. International coordination has improved substantially. The International Energy Agency coordinates emergency responses among member countries. Strategic petroleum reserves total over 4 billion barrels globally. These coordinated stocks can replace lost supply during disruptions. The system was established specifically in response to 1970s experiences. Geopolitical Context and Supply Dynamics The nature of supply disruptions has evolved. Today’s shocks often involve temporary production issues rather than prolonged embargoes. The global supply network is more diversified with multiple major producers. No single region dominates as OPEC did in the 1970s. This diversification reduces systemic risk. Technological advancements in extraction have transformed supply elasticity. Shale oil production can respond quickly to price signals. U.S. shale acts as a swing producer, adding supply within months rather than years. This responsiveness didn’t exist during earlier crises. It creates a natural ceiling on sustained price spikes. Inflation Transmission and Consumer Impact Commerzbank’s analysis reveals critical differences in inflation mechanisms. The 1970s featured strong indexation of wages to prices. Today, such indexation is rare in developed economies. Consequently, oil price increases create less persistent inflationary pressure. Central banks can address temporary spikes without triggering wage spirals. Consumer behavior has also changed dramatically. Households now spend a smaller portion of income on energy. Improved vehicle efficiency reduces gasoline expenditure. Better home insulation decreases heating costs. These cumulative changes buffer consumers from price volatility. The economic impact is therefore more contained. Key differences identified by Commerzbank: Energy intensity of GDP reduced by 60% since 1973 Service sector dominance versus manufacturing focus Advanced hedging instruments and derivatives markets Strategic petroleum reserves and international coordination Diversified energy sources including renewables Regional Variations and Emerging Markets The analysis acknowledges important regional differences. Advanced economies show greatest resilience improvements. Emerging markets remain more vulnerable due to different economic structures. However, even developing nations benefit from global market mechanisms. They access hedging tools and benefit from diversified supply. Commerzbank’s research includes specific regional assessments. European economies demonstrate particular resilience through renewable integration. Asian manufacturing economies show varied responses depending on policy frameworks. The analysis provides nuanced understanding beyond aggregate conclusions. Long-Term Implications and Future Risks While current shocks are less damaging, new vulnerabilities have emerged. The energy transition creates complex interdependencies. Electric vehicle adoption increases electricity demand while reducing oil consumption. This shift changes the nature of energy security concerns. Future crises may involve different commodities and transmission channels. Climate policies introduce additional considerations. Carbon pricing mechanisms interact with energy markets in new ways. Commerzbank’s research team notes these evolving dynamics. Their analysis provides framework for understanding future market developments. The lessons from 1970s comparisons inform forward-looking policy design. Digitalization creates both resilience and vulnerability. Smart grids and demand response capabilities improve system flexibility. However, cyber threats present new risks to energy infrastructure. Comprehensive security approaches must address these modern challenges alongside traditional supply concerns. Conclusion Commerzbank’s thorough analysis demonstrates significant economic progress since the 1970s oil price shock era. Structural changes in energy efficiency, economic composition, and policy frameworks have reduced vulnerability. While current market volatility demands attention, the apocalyptic scenarios of fifty years ago remain historical artifacts rather than imminent threats. The global economy has developed remarkable resilience through diversification, innovation, and institutional learning from past crises. FAQs Q1: What main factors make today’s oil price shock less damaging than the 1970s crisis? Commerzbank identifies reduced energy intensity, service sector dominance, improved hedging instruments, strategic petroleum reserves, and diversified energy sources as key factors reducing economic vulnerability. Q2: How much has energy efficiency improved since the 1970s? The global economy now uses approximately 60% less oil per unit of GDP compared to 1973, fundamentally reducing the economic impact of price increases. Q3: Do emerging markets show the same resilience as developed economies? While all economies benefit from global market mechanisms, emerging markets remain more vulnerable due to different economic structures and development levels, according to Commerzbank’s regional analysis. Q4: How have monetary policy approaches changed since the 1970s? Modern central banks maintain clear inflation targets and independent mandates, responding more aggressively to price pressures to prevent the wage-price spirals that characterized the 1970s crisis. Q5: What role does U.S. shale production play in modern oil market stability? Shale oil acts as a swing producer that can respond to price signals within months, creating a natural ceiling on sustained price spikes that didn’t exist during earlier crises. This post Oil Price Shock: Why Today’s Crisis Pales Against 1970s Nightmare – Commerzbank Reveals first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
17 Apr 2026, 07:55
Top 6 Crypto PR Strategies for Building Institutional Credibility in 2026
More than 2,000 US advisory firms now allocate to crypto ETPs. Spot Bitcoin ETF assets exceed $100 billion. At least 172 publicly traded companies hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets , a figure that grew 40% quarter over quarter through late 2025. Institutional capital no longer questions whether crypto is legitimate. It questions which projects are credible enough to allocate to. The PR for institutional crypto that convinces retail traders does not convince allocators. These six strategies build the specific credibility signals institutional decision-makers require. Strategy 1: Place Earned Coverage in Mainstream Finance Media Institutional allocators read Bloomberg, Forbes, Financial Times, and The Wall Street Journal. They may also read CoinDesk and The Block. They rarely read mid-tier crypto outlets. Target dual placement: crypto-native tier-1 outlets for sector credibility, and mainstream finance outlets for institutional audiences who need blockchain context before they extend credibility. Pitch mainstream outlets with the financial narrative, not the technical one. An allocator cares about risk-adjusted returns, market structure implications, and regulatory positioning, not consensus mechanisms. A Bloomberg article about a project carries more weight in an investment committee than ten CoinDesk articles. Mainstream placements also reach compliance teams, who flag projects with no presence in regulated media as higher risk. Outset PR's StealthEX campaign secured coverage in Forbes, Business Insider, and The Independent alongside crypto-native outlets: 40 tier-1 mentions across both finance and crypto media created a coverage footprint that survives institutional due diligence. Strategy 2: Build Compliance-Safe Messaging That Survives Legal Review Institutional firms run every crypto investment through a compliance review. Press materials that contain speculative claims, implied returns, or ambiguous regulatory language trigger red flags. Coordinate all press materials with legal counsel before distribution. Remove language that implies price appreciation, guaranteed yields, or investment outcomes. Frame the project in utility terms: what the technology does, who it serves, and how it creates value. Reference regulatory alignment explicitly: compliance frameworks, audit results, licensing status. Compliance teams search for the project's name and read what comes up. Every earned article must pass the same standard as the project's own legal disclosures. The interview with Nisheta Sachdev on why crypto marketing requires institutional discipline reflects this principle: institutional audiences demand precision, not promotion. Strategy 3: Make the Founder Accessible as an Expert Source Allocators assess the person behind the project before they assess the product. A founder who appears in Bloomberg, commenting on market structure, carries more weight than a founder whose only media presence is a project announcement. Position the founder as a reactive commentary source on institutional topics: ETF flows, regulatory shifts, stablecoin policy, and tokenised securities. Respond to journalist requests within hours, with pre-approved quotes that demonstrate market-level understanding. Build a 12-month track record of expert quotes across finance and crypto outlets. Institutional due diligence includes searching the founder's name. Consistent expert commentary signals domain authority and accessibility. Outset PR's Press Office model generates this kind of steady founder visibility through combined proactive pitching and reactive commentary. Nav Markets used it to secure 48 tier-1 mentions across Cointelegraph, Decrypt, and Yahoo Finance. Strategy 4: Publish Data-Backed Research That Analysts Can Reference Institutional analysts build investment cases using third-party data and research. A project that publishes its own rigorous, data-backed analysis becomes a source analysts cite in their memos. Publish quarterly reports with on-chain metrics, adoption data, and ecosystem growth figures. Structure reports for analyst consumption: clear methodology, verifiable data sources, downloadable charts. Distribute through earned media to give the research editorial validation. This is also how projects build AI citation authority. Structured, data-rich content published on high-authority outlets feeds into AI systems that allocators increasingly query during research. Outset PR applies this approach through its own Cointelegraph traffic analysis , demonstrating how data-backed analysis published in earned media builds the kind of authority that analysts and AI systems both recognise. This is what separates a crypto PR for enterprise strategy from retail-focused promotion. Strategy 5: Use Regulatory Milestones as PR Triggers Every regulatory compliance milestone is a credibility event that institutional audiences care about. Most projects treat audit completions, licensing approvals, and compliance framework adoptions as internal updates. They should treat them as PR events. Frame regulatory alignment as a competitive advantage. "We completed MiCA registration ahead of the deadline," or "We passed SOC 2 Type II audit," are stories institutional media will cover. Time these announcements to align with broader regulatory news cycles for maximum editorial pickup. Institutional allocators use regulatory milestones as screening criteria. A project with documented compliance history passes filters that unregulated projects fail. Each compliance announcement creates a searchable, verifiable proof point that survives due diligence for years. This is what makes institutional crypto PR strategy different from retail PR: the content must function as a permanent compliance record, not a temporary visibility spike. Strategy 6: Sustain Coverage Between Milestones The biggest institutional PR failure is the coverage gap. A project announces a major milestone, generates a week of coverage, goes silent for three months, and then wonders why institutional interest stalled. Maintain a monthly cadence of earned coverage through thought leadership, expert commentary, and ecosystem updates. Track branded search volume and AI visibility monthly. Any decline signals a gap that institutional due diligence will find. Institutional due diligence checks are not one-time events. Compliance teams re-check media presence quarterly. Gaps in coverage raise questions about project continuity. Outset PR's blog on why good PR can kill your Web3 project if legal is ignored shows the inverse risk: PR that creates legal exposure is worse than no PR at all. Building PR for crypto allocators requires both sustained visibility and compliance discipline. Institutional PR at a Glance This table maps each strategy to its institutional audience and the credibility signal it produces. Strategy Target audience Credibility signal Mainstream finance media placement Investment committees, compliance teams Editorial validation in outlets that allocators trust Compliance-safe messaging Legal and compliance reviewers No speculative claims, regulatory alignment documented Founder as expert source Fund managers, analysts Domain authority through consistent commentary Data-backed research Analysts, portfolio managers Intellectual leadership with verifiable methodology Regulatory milestones as PR Compliance screening teams Documented compliance history that passes due diligence Sustained coverage between milestones Ongoing due diligence reviews No gaps in media presence that raise continuity questions Conclusion Institutional credibility is not built through a single placement or a launch-week campaign. It is built through a sustained, compliance-aware media presence that survives quarterly due diligence reviews. The six strategies above address the specific signals that allocators, compliance teams, and analysts search for before committing capital. Projects that treat PR as infrastructure rather than a campaign build the kind of visibility that institutional money trusts. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
17 Apr 2026, 01:27
This promising anti-aging drugs just failed its human test
One of the most studied lifespan-extending drugs in animals has just failed its test on humans in a 13-week clinical trial co-funded by DeSci community VitaDAO. The trial led by Dr. Brad Stanfield, a General Practitioner based in Auckland, New Zealand, sought to know how the so-called drug “rapamycin,” combined with exercise, fares in older adults. “Rapamycin didn’t help. Instead, it may have made things worse,” said Dr. Stanfield. Rapamycin is one of the most studied lifespan-extending drugs in animals. So @BradStanfieldMD ran a proper clinical trial to see what happens in humans. @vitadao and @LifespanNews co-funded it 💛 40 people, aged 65-85, all doing the same exercise program for 13 weeks. Half got… https://t.co/PwlDmJ45WK — VitaDAO 💛 (@vitadao) April 16, 2026 Up to 40 sedentary people aged 65-85 were studied in the trial. Once a week, half received 6 mg rapamycin (sirolimus), while the other group got placebo pills, which are basically identical-looking inactive drugs that serve to contrast the effects of real medications. Placebo participants improved more than rapamycin’s group All the participants underwent the same exercise programs. The idea was to use exercise to activate mTOR, which signals the muscles to build protein and get stronger, and then use rapamycin to shift the body into autophagy, which has been found to promote long-term health in animal studies. “Alternate the two, and you get the best of both worlds. At least, that was the theory,” said Dr. Stanfield. Those who got placebos fared much better. They could walk a longer distance, have better strength, and also gained ~3.4 more chair-stand reps than the rapamycin group. Although both groups saw an equal rate of people (85% each) reporting side effects, Dr. Stanfield said the rapamycin group saw a higher number of events (99 vs 63), to the extent one participant was hospitalized with pneumonia after receiving a single rapamycin dose. What went wrong in the rapamycin clinical test? For context, a PubMed Central report notes that a three-month rapamycin treatment raises the life expectancy of rodents by up to 60%. So, the efficacy of the drug is not in question, per se. “Leading theory is a pharmacokinetic problem,” Dr. Stanfield said. Pharmacokinetics is essentially the study of how long a drug stays around in the body. In this case, rapamycin has a half-life of approximately 62 hours, which means that it interferes with training sessions and the muscle-building process. “Even dosing it the day after exercise, active drug levels persisted into the next training sessions, partially blocking mTOR when muscles needed it most,” Dr. Stanfield explained . He went on to conclude that “exercise remains the single best intervention for preserving function in older adults.” Crypto community takes part in anti-aging research Longevity research is increasingly becoming a big part of DeSci. The 13-week trial was co-funded by a decentralized autonomous community, VitaDAO, which has been funding related studies since 2021, as opposed to traditional financing, which is said to exacerbate the “valley of death” between discovery and the clinic. Crypto founders are not left out. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, including Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, has been donating directly to labs and organizations focused on longevity. Armstrong is also the co-founder of ResearchHub and NewLimit , a biotech company using epigenetic reprogramming to fight aging, which he believes is the root cause of most major diseases. Aging is arguably the root cause of most major diseases. Our cells lose function as we age, allowing various conditions to manifest, which is why most major diseases correlate with age. Yes, it is more complex than this, but this is a major component. @newlimit is working on… pic.twitter.com/pXJuL2gig1 — Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) April 14, 2026 The crypto card with no spending limits. Get 3% cashback and instant mobile payments. Claim your Ether.fi card.
17 Apr 2026, 00:02
Shiba Inu Price Analysis As SHIB Golden Cross Flashes
Shiba Inu is trading at approximately $0.000005934 , with a slight decline over the past 24 hours. Although there’s been some recovery across major cryptocurrencies, SHIB has continued to move sideways, showing limited strength when compared to other assets. This relative underperformance has contributed to the token losing its position as the second-largest meme coin by market capitalization. Market activity around SHIB has also weakened. Trading volume has dropped by about 16% within the last day, indicating reduced participation from traders. In the derivatives market, open interest has declined by 8% to 9.37 trillion SHIB, valued at roughly $56.24 million. This reduction suggests that both short-term traders and leveraged participants are becoming less active, likely shifting attention to other assets with stronger momentum. Short-Term Golden Cross Signals Potential Momentum Shift On lower timeframes, however, there are early signs of improving momentum. SHIB recently formed a golden cross on the 30-minute chart, a technical development that occurs when the 50-period moving average moves above the 200-period moving average. This pattern is often interpreted as an indication of a stronger buying pressure. The crossover took place on Tuesday and was accompanied by a notable price rally, with SHIB recording its largest intraday gain in that timeframe. Although the price has since pulled back slightly from its intraday peak of $0.00000603, the bullish crossover is still intact for now. That said, signals on shorter timeframes can be unreliable without broader confirmation. A reversal pattern, such as a death cross, could still develop if momentum weakens again. Because of this, traders usually look for alignment with higher timeframe indicators before drawing strong conclusions about trend direction. Range-Bound Structure Defines Broader Market Behavior Looking at the daily chart, SHIB has been consolidating within a defined price channel for approximately 35 days, from March 11. Within this structure, the asset has consistently moved between established support and resistance levels without establishing a clear trend. Following a decline of 2.83% on Tuesday, SHIB is now approaching the lower boundary of this range. If selling pressure continues, the price may revisit the support level around $0.00000562. A breakdown below this area could lead to further downside, with potential targets at $0.00000523 and subsequently $0.0000050. On the other hand, if buyers regain control near current levels or at support, SHIB could attempt to move toward the upper boundary of the channel, which is situated around $0.00000625. A sustained move above this resistance may open the path to higher prices, starting from $0.00000644. Beyond that, the next significant resistance is near $0.00000725, corresponding to a previous lower high established in mid-February. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 For any sustained upward movement to take hold, SHIB must maintain its position above key moving averages. At present, the token is trading just above its 50-day moving average, which lies near $0.00000584. Holding this level could provide a foundation for further gains. After this, the next important threshold is the 100-day moving average at approximately $0.00000656. A move above this level would strengthen the case for a broader trend reversal. Until then, SHIB’s price action will likely remain constrained within its current range, with both bullish and bearish scenarios relying on how the price reacts at key support and resistance zones. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Shiba Inu Price Analysis As SHIB Golden Cross Flashes appeared first on Times Tabloid .
