hodler

19 Mar 2026, 08:27

Neutrl Front-End Attack Update: Urgent User Security Warning Prompted

Neutrl flags possible front-end compromise, asks users to avoid platform interactions until further notice. DNS-level attack suspected, redirecting users to malicious interface targeting wallet approvals. Users urged to revoke Permit2 permissions via Revoke.cash to prevent potential fund access. Decentralised finance protocol Neutrl is looking into a suspected security attack on its front-end interface. The security breach led to an urgent advisory for users to stop all activity on the platform and review wallet permissions. The team shared the issue through a series of updates on X saying that its website may have been compromised. Even as the exact scope of the incident is still being probed, users have been asked to not interact with the application until further notice. The warning was issued as developers continue to examine the source and impact of the breach. Neutrl’s Frontend Compromised by a DNS Hijack Initial results indicate that the incident might correlate with a domain-level attack and not an underlying weakness in the smart contracts. On the project’s update, it pointed out that the domain service provider hosting the application was targeted via social engineering. Using this technique an attacker bypassed routing control of the site essentially taking the users to a malicious version of the interface. Such attacks are typically hard to identify on first glance. Update on the ongoing security incident: We are currently working with @0xGroomLake on the investigation. Initial findings suggest the DNS provider hosting the app domain was socially engineered, allowing an attacker to redirect the domain. Neutrl smart contracts remain secure… — Neutrl (@Neutrl) March 19, 2026 The platform may be similar, the same layout and functions as before. But, at the same time, the actions taken by the user can then spawn the bad requests. In this instance, the problem is related to permission approval with wallet access. Users were specifically warned by the protocol about Permit2 approvals. These permissions permit external contracts or addresses to administer tokens for the user. When an attacker gets access to them, they can make unapproved transfers without further verification. Neutrl has asked users to use Revoke.cash, a tool widely used to manage and cancel token approvals, to reduce potential risks. By revoking these permissions, users can prevent further access to their assets, even if a malicious approval was previously allowed. The advisory included specific contract addresses i.e., 0x23f2741EaA0045038e9b52100CdcC890163dE53F 0xa0Adf074056E41dfB892aFC69881E15073b384b9 that should be checked and removed. Users were also encouraged to review their wallets more and revoke any permissions linked to unfamiliar addresses. The process is considered an important step in limiting exposure after such incidents and is simple as well. Importantly, the team clarified that its smart contracts remain secure. As a precaution, they have been temporarily stopped as the investigation goes on. This step is aimed to prevent any unintended interactions until the issue is fully understood and resolved. The nature of the attack brought to light a recurring vulnerability in decentralised applications. Even smart contracts themselves may be audited and secure, the front-end interfaces that users interact with can become targets. Once an attacker gets access to a domain, they can place a layer between users and the actual protocol. With this, they can intercept their actions and redirect them. This creates a situation where users believe they are using a real platform. In reality, they may be authorizing transactions that grant control over their assets. Once such permissions are put up, funds can be moved without extra approvals. The Neutrl team has said it is working with external security specialists to probe the incident and track its origin. Further updates are expected as more details become available. A full post-incident report is also planned, which will plan the sequence of events and any measures taken to prevent similar issues in the future. Also Read: Bonk.fun Hack Sparks Alert; Founder Puts Users First

18 Mar 2026, 15:51

THE drops over 40% after DeFi exploit tied to Venus Protocol shakes investor confidence

A few days after the supply cap manipulation attack that saw an attacker borrow over $14.9 million from the DeFi platform Venus Protocol, the value of $THE, the native token of another DeFi platform, Thena, which was used in the attack, continues to drop. Thena has insisted that its own smart contracts were never affected, but this has not been sufficient to change market sentiments, as THE has dropped by over 44% since March 15. The token has gone from $0.27 following the incident to $0.15 as of the time of writing. Its trading volume has also contracted by more than 51%. Thena’s token continues to trend downward despite its latest moves. Source: CoinMarketCap Meanwhile, XVS , the governance token of Venus Protocol, which has been pointed to as the source of the whole debacle, tells a different story, as it is up more than 12% over the same seven-day window while trading at over $3.35. Venus Protocol’s VXS token has stayed in the green despite the exploit news. Source: CoinMarketCap Analysts are assuming that it seems the markets have largely assigned blame to the architecture of one specific Venus lending market rather than to either protocol’s integrity, and in this case, it is Thena that’s bearing the brunt. The protocol is now making moves to reverse its fortunes, one of which is rewarding remaining holders with markedly higher annual percentage yields (APRs). Can a ‘large APR increase’ restore confidence in Thena? As part of its next steps, Thena stated on March 17 that THE Single Sided Vaults will see a large increase in APR, driven by fees generated during the incident. It added that this will be updated weekly on Tuesdays. In a separate post on the same day, Thena confirmed that it had refreshed the Single Sided Vault APRs to reflect fee generation over the past 7 days. It also mentioned that the vaults, operated in conjunction with ICHI Foundation, allow users to enter with a single asset while dynamically managing exposure, typically holding between 65 and 95% of the deposited token depending on prevailing conditions. Voters in the current governance epoch are also set to receive outsized returns following the volume surge. So far, Thena’s token has not responded to these stimuli, and market observers will continue to keep a close watch on developments. Attacker leaves bad debt after borrowing $14.9 million According to the post-mortem published by Venus Protocol, the attacker who started this drama started working on the exploit about nine months ago, accumulating $THE across multiple wallets and eventually controlling roughly 84% of the 14.5 million token supply cap on Venus Protocol’s THE lending market. That accumulation phase was funded by 7,447 ETH, worth approximately $16.29 million, per the report. This amount was withdrawn in 77 separate transactions from Tornado Cash, deposited as collateral on Aave, and went on to borrow about $9.92 million in stablecoins (USDT, DAI, USDC), which the attacker used to purchase THE progressively without triggering alarms. The attack itself was executed on March 15 at 11:55 UTC, bypassing the supply cap check. This inflated the contract’s internal exchange rate by 3.81 times, and this caused a $3.3 million collateral position to transform into more than $12 million of recognized borrowing power. The attacker then extracted $14.9 million in assets, all comprising 6.67 million CAKE tokens, 2,801 BNB, 1,972 WBNB, $1.58 million USDC, and 20 BTCB. The attacker stated a cycle of borrowing, swapping, and donations that pushed THE’s price from $0.26 to $0.51 on-chain, pushing total supplied tokens 3.67 times the supply cap to 53.2 million. When it ended, Venus held approximately $2.15 million in bad debt, denominated primarily in CAKE and THE. In the post-mortem, it was mentioned that the vulnerability that was exploited was first flagged in 2023, to which Venus’ development team deemed to have no side effects and did not deploy a remediation to solve the issue. The Venus Protocol team now acknowledges that more could have been done to prevent the exploit . If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

18 Mar 2026, 12:40

EUR/USD Pullback: Critical Risk Emerges from Fed’s Hawkish Signals

BitcoinWorld EUR/USD Pullback: Critical Risk Emerges from Fed’s Hawkish Signals LONDON, March 2025 – The EUR/USD currency pair, a cornerstone of global forex markets, now faces a significant technical pullback risk, a danger amplified by recent signals from the Federal Reserve. Analysis from ING, a leading financial institution, highlights this precarious position through detailed chart examination. Consequently, traders and investors must scrutinize the interplay between technical patterns and shifting central bank rhetoric. This development carries substantial implications for international trade, investment flows, and economic stability across both continents. EUR/USD Technical Setup Signals Vulnerability Technical analysis provides the initial framework for understanding the current EUR/USD landscape. Charts examined by ING analysts reveal the pair testing a crucial resistance zone following its recent rally. Specifically, the pair approaches the 1.0950-1.1000 region, a level that has historically acted as a formidable barrier. Moreover, momentum indicators, including the Relative Strength Index (RSI), show signs of divergence, suggesting weakening bullish energy. This setup often precedes a corrective move lower. Key technical levels now define the immediate risk. A break below the 1.0850 support could trigger a swift move toward the 200-day moving average, currently near 1.0750. The following table outlines the critical technical thresholds: Level Type Significance 1.1000 Resistance Major psychological and historical barrier 1.0950 Resistance Upper bound of current congestion zone 1.0850 Support Immediate technical floor; breach signals bearish shift 1.0750 Support 200-day moving average; key trend definition level Market positioning data further complicates the outlook. According to the latest Commitments of Traders (COT) reports, speculative net-long positions on the euro have expanded considerably. This crowded trade increases the pair’s sensitivity to negative catalysts, potentially accelerating a pullback as participants unwind positions. Federal Reserve Policy Stance Fuels Dollar Strength The primary catalyst for this emerging risk stems from the United States Federal Reserve. Recent communications from Fed officials have struck a notably hawkish tone, emphasizing persistent inflationary pressures. For instance, minutes from the latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting revealed ongoing concerns about service-sector inflation and a tight labor market. Therefore, the market’s expectation for the timing and pace of interest rate cuts has shifted dramatically. Market-implied probabilities now price in a later start to the easing cycle, with the first full 25-basis-point cut pushed to the latter half of 2025. This repricing directly benefits the US dollar through two main channels: Yield Advantage: Higher-for-longer US rates maintain the dollar’s yield attractiveness against the euro. Safe-Haven Flows: A cautious Fed signals economic resilience but also vigilance, supporting the dollar’s safe-haven status. Historical data underscores this relationship. Periods of Fed policy tightening or delayed easing have consistently correlated with broad US dollar strength. The DXY Dollar Index, which measures the dollar against a basket of major currencies, has already shown firming momentum, creating a headwind for EUR/USD. ING’s Analytical Perspective on Diverging Central Banks ING’s currency strategists frame the situation as a tale of two central banks. While the Fed delays its pivot, the European Central Bank (ECB) faces a different set of economic challenges. Eurozone growth data remains subdued, with Germany, the bloc’s largest economy, flirting with technical recession. Consequently, the ECB maintains a more dovish forward guidance, explicitly discussing rate cuts for the coming quarters. This growing policy divergence between the Fed and ECB forms the fundamental core of the pullback thesis. “The technical overextension in EUR/USD meets a fundamental catalyst,” an ING report stated, referencing the shifting Fed expectations. “The pair has rallied on anticipatory euro strength, but the Fed is not yet playing ball. This disconnect creates a clear vulnerability.” The analysis references real-time options market pricing, where the premium for puts (bearish bets) on EUR/USD has increased relative to calls (bullish bets), indicating rising hedging activity against a decline. Broader Market Impacts and Real-World Consequences A sustained pullback in EUR/USD carries tangible effects beyond forex trading desks. For European exporters, a weaker euro could provide a competitive boost, making goods cheaper in dollar-denominated markets. Conversely, European consumers and importers would face higher costs for dollar-priced commodities like energy. Furthermore, multinational corporations with significant transatlantic earnings would see currency translation effects impact their quarterly results. Global capital flows would also feel the impact. A stronger dollar typically pressures emerging market currencies and can tighten financial conditions worldwide. It also influences the valuation of dollar-denominated debt held by foreign entities, including European governments and corporations. The timeline for these effects is immediate; currency markets price in new information within minutes, with real economic consequences following in subsequent weeks and months. Conclusion The EUR/USD pair stands at a critical juncture, with technical exhaustion converging with a hawkish recalibration of Federal Reserve policy. ING’s analysis underscores the heightened risk of a meaningful pullback toward key support levels. While the long-term trajectory will ultimately depend on relative growth and inflation dynamics between the US and Eurozone, the immediate path appears skewed toward dollar strength. Market participants must now weigh technical signals against the evolving fundamental backdrop, where the Fed’s delayed pivot presents a clear and present challenge to the euro’s recent gains. FAQs Q1: What does a “pullback risk” mean for EUR/USD? A pullback risk refers to the increased probability of a short-to-medium-term decline in the exchange rate, correcting a prior upward move. It is often identified through technical analysis showing overbought conditions and is frequently triggered by fundamental news, such as shifts in central bank policy. Q2: What specific Fed signals are causing this risk? Recent signals include FOMC meeting minutes highlighting persistent inflation concerns, speeches by Fed officials dismissing imminent rate cuts, and market derivatives repricing to reflect a later start to the monetary policy easing cycle than previously expected. Q3: How does the European Central Bank’s policy affect this situation? The ECB is generally expected to begin cutting interest rates before the Fed due to weaker Eurozone growth. This policy divergence—where the Fed stays hawkish longer than the ECB—creates a fundamental disadvantage for the euro against the US dollar, exacerbating technical pullback risks. Q4: What key price level should traders watch for a confirmed pullback? A sustained break below the 1.0850 support level would be a critical technical confirmation, potentially opening the path for a move toward the 200-day moving average around 1.0750. Holding above 1.0850 could indicate consolidation rather than a deep correction. Q5: Beyond forex traders, who is affected by EUR/USD movements? Movements impact European importers and exporters, multinational corporate earnings, international investment flows, the cost of dollar-denominated debt for European entities, and can influence broader global financial conditions and emerging market stability. This post EUR/USD Pullback: Critical Risk Emerges from Fed’s Hawkish Signals first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

18 Mar 2026, 09:10

Trump backs Pentagon ban on Anthropic over national security concerns

In court documents filed Tuesday, the Trump administration maintained that the Pentagon’s blacklisting of Anthropic was legally sound, contesting the company’s significant lawsuits. The Claude developer initiated two federal lawsuits on Monday, arguing it faced illegal retaliation for advocating for AI safety. It insists that Pentagon officials are using the blacklist to punish it for refusing to drop protections against autonomous weaponization and surveillance, thus violating its First Amendment rights. On March 3, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth formally classified Anthropic as a supply chain risk over national security concerns. Anthropic was blacklisted over national security concerns In its court filing, the Trump administration noted , “For national security reasons, the terms of service for plaintiff Anthropic PBC’s artificial intelligence (AI) technology have become unacceptable to the Executive Branch. Anthropic concedes the Government’s right not ‘to use Anthropic’s services’ and to ‘transition to other AI providers.’” It further contended that Anthropic’s First Amendment argument is a stretch and won’t stand up under legal scrutiny. It asserted that its actions were driven solely by national security concerns, not by a desire to punish the company for its AI safety views. It also claimed that during its talks with the company, Anthropic’s overall attitude led them to second-guess whether it would be a good fit for the Department of Defense. According to the filing, the Pentagon reportedly became concerned that Anthropic could pose a vulnerability to its defense supply chains. Reportedly, government officials fear the company might pull the plug on its systems in the middle of a conflict if it doesn’t like how the tech is being used. Anthropic is concerned about giving the government autonomous force Negotiations have stalled for months over Anthropic’s refusal to lift safety rules that prevent AI from being used in mass surveillance or automated combat. The AI firm has maintained that allowing “any lawful use” as requested by the DoD would go against its core safety principles and increase the risk of misuse of its Claude systems. So far, anti-war activists have been hailing Anthropic as a hero for resisting the military. However, co-founder and chief executive Dario Amodei recently noted that the AI firm and the government broadly share the same objectives. Margaret Mitchell, an AI researcher and chief ethics scientist at the tech firm Hugging Face, even cautioned, “If people are looking for good guys and bad guys, where a good guy is someone who doesn’t support war, then they’re not going to find that here.” Amodei also remarked , “Anthropic has much more in common with the Department of War than we have differences.” He shared his concerns about the dangers of AI-made bioweapons and Chinese interference, but he also believes AI companies have a duty to help governments win the tech war against autocracies. Per his remarks, he’s less worried about AI being used in war and more terrified of a handful of people having the power to launch a massive, mindless, automated drone strike at the push of a button. At the moment, the executive is balancing a firm “no” on autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance; however, the firm has otherwise been a highly cooperative ally of the US military. Previously, the company altered its AI models for the Department of Defense; they actually built Claude into the government’s most secure, classified networks, including satellite imagery systems, intelligence analysis, modeling and simulation, and operational planning In its recent lawsuit, it even noted, “Anthropic does not impose the same restrictions on the military’s use of Claude as it does on civilian customers. Claude Gov is less prone to refuse requests that would be prohibited in the civilian context.” The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

12 Mar 2026, 15:11

McGlone Warns Bitcoin May Plunge to $10,000 by 2026

Mike McGlone foresees a potential drop in Bitcoin’s value to $10,000 by 2026. He attributes significant market vulnerability to global economic and monetary risks. Continue Reading: McGlone Warns Bitcoin May Plunge to $10,000 by 2026 The post McGlone Warns Bitcoin May Plunge to $10,000 by 2026 appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

12 Mar 2026, 12:03

BONK could rally higher amid Bonk.fun hijack: Check forecast

The cryptocurrency market is currently experiencing mixed performance, with some coins in the red, while others are rallying. BONK, one of the leading memecoins in the crypto space, is up by 1% in the last 24 hours despite negative news from the Bonk ecosystem. The memecoin could rally higher in the near term, thanks to positive technical indicators. Bonk.fun website hacked, users’ funds drained BONK is up by 1% in the last 24 hours and now trades at $0.00000596. The positive performance comes despite Bonk announcing that its Solana-based memecoin launchpad, Bonk.fun, experienced a security breach on Wednesday. The attackers compromised its domain and deployed a malicious wallet-draining script designed to siphon funds from connected wallets. The project confirmed the breach in a statement on social media, warning that the platform’s domain had fallen under the control of a malicious actor. The Bonk operator, Tom, added that the losses from the hack were minimal, as the team spotted the security breach soon after it occurred. "We understand a lot of people are scared and rightly so, but we’re doing everything in our power to fix the situation," Tom wrote. Bonk.fun, originally known as LetsBonk.fun, emerged as a key player in Solana's memecoin ecosystem by offering instant token deployment, real-time trading via bonding curves, and automatic liquidity provision. The platform uses a portion of fees to support buybacks and burns of the BONK token. Tom pointed out that Bonk.fun places a major emphasis on its community and accessibility for non-technical users. This latest development comes as phishing attacks in crypto have become increasingly sophisticated and prevalent. The sophistication can be tied to advancements in AI, the rise of wallet drainers, and tactics like domain hijacking, impersonation, and social engineering that exploit user trust rather than technical vulnerabilities. Chainalysis’s 2025 report shows that overall crypto scam losses reached around $17 billion last year, adding that major scam operations are becoming more industrialized. BONK eyes the $0.00000685 swing high Similar to Dogecoin and Shiba Inu, BONK’s 4-hour chart is currently bearish and efficient. The momentum indicators have switched positive, suggesting that the bulls are currently in control of the market. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) of 54 is above the neutral 50, indicating that the buyers are applying pressure. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator is also converging, suggesting a growing bullish momentum. If the buying pressure persists, BONK could rally towards the March 4th high of $0.00000645. An extended bullish scenario would allow BONK to take out the February 25 swing high of $0.00000685 in the near term. However, if the market reacts to the hack, BONK could dip towards the weekly support level at $0.00000548. Losing this support level could increase the selling pressure towards the February 6 low of $0.00000512. The post BONK could rally higher amid Bonk.fun hijack: Check forecast appeared first on Invezz