Invest ideasNews
22 Apr 2026, 12:46
Interview: memecoins a gateway, not end goal, says Nischal Shetty on Sikka.fun
As memecoin-led platforms gain traction, questions around onboarding, speculation, and long-term value are becoming harder to ignore. Sikka.fun, developed within the Shardeum ecosystem, is positioned as a simplified entry point into Web3, allowing users to create and interact with tokens with minimal friction. While the model aims to lower barriers to participation, it also draws comparisons with earlier platforms that saw rapid growth alongside volatility. In this interview with Invezz , Shardeum's Nischal Shetty discusses the thinking behind Sikka.fun, how it approaches user onboarding, and where it fits within the broader Shardeum ecosystem. Invezz: Sikka.fun is being framed as a simple entry point into Web3. Is the goal onboarding first-time users, or building a high-frequency trading ecosystem around memecoins? Our primary goal with Sikka.fun is onboarding, lowering the psychological and technical barriers that prevent millions of people from participating in Web3. Memecoins happen to be one of the most culturally accessible entry points because they are easy to understand and inherently community-driven. That said, we are not trying to build a high-frequency trading platform. The intent is to create an environment where users can experiment, learn how tokens work, understand wallets, and experience decentralization firsthand. If users start by interacting with a memecoin but later move into more utility-driven applications within the Shardeum ecosystem, we consider that a success. Memecoins are not the end goal; they are the gateway. Invezz: Most tokens on such platforms have no intrinsic value and rely on community momentum. How do you respond to concerns that this is closer to speculation infrastructure than meaningful Web3 adoption? Speculation has always been part of early technology markets. We saw it in the early internet era, in domain trading, in mobile apps, and even in NFTs. While many tokens may not have intrinsic value initially, they create participation loops that bring users onchain. The key distinction is whether a platform simply enables speculation or uses that momentum to educate and transition users into more meaningful onchain activity. Our approach is to make participation simple, but the broader Shardeum ecosystem provides opportunities beyond memecoins, whether that is DeFi, identity, community governance, or tokenized communities. In that sense, speculation can act as an initial catalyst, but sustainable adoption comes from utility layered on top. Invezz: Pump.fun scaled rapidly by making token creation frictionless, but that also led to millions of low-quality tokens and speculative churn. What specific design choices in Sikka.fun are meant to avoid that same outcome? Frictionless creation is powerful, but completely removing guardrails often leads to noise overwhelming signals. With Sikka.fun, we are thinking carefully about how to maintain simplicity while still encouraging responsible participation. Some examples include: • Thoughtful discovery mechanisms that surface tokens gaining genuine community traction. • Transparent token information and onchain data visibility. • Gradual introduction of reputation signals and social credibility layers. • UX design that emphasises learning and experimentation rather than purely trading behaviour. Our aim is not to eliminate experimentation, but to reduce purely extractive behaviour that does not contribute to ecosystem health. Invezz: How do you ensure Sikka.fun doesn’t structurally incentivise early insiders at the expense of late retail participants? One of the lessons from previous cycles is that asymmetric access destroys long-term trust. We are exploring mechanisms that make token launches more transparent and fair by default, including clear visibility into supply distribution, liquidity conditions, and creator behaviour. Shardeum’s underlying architecture also allows us to design systems where participation is not restricted to a small set of privileged actors. Long-term ecosystems cannot rely on extractive short-term mechanics. If users feel disadvantaged structurally, they simply stop participating. Trust compounds slowly, but disappears quickly. Invezz: Memecoin platforms often see sharp boom-bust cycles. What makes Sikka.fun structurally different from short-lived hype-driven ecosystems? Most hype cycles collapse because they exist in isolation. Sikka.fun is part of a broader ecosystem vision. It connects to a Layer 1 network designed for scalability, low fees, and accessibility. Our belief is that onboarding products should not exist as standalone islands. They should create pathways into deeper participation, whether through community ownership, governance, or decentralized applications. The more integrated the ecosystem becomes, the less dependent it is on cyclical hype. Invezz: Where does the platform’s long-term revenue come from—transaction fees, token appreciation, or user growth loops? And how aligned are those incentives with user outcomes? Sustainable platforms align revenue with ecosystem growth, not short-term trading volume spikes. Over time, the value comes from network activity, as more users experiment, create, and participate onchain. When users remain engaged beyond a single transaction, network effects strengthen, and the ecosystem becomes more resilient. We believe long-term value comes from enabling participation at scale, not maximising short-term extraction . Invezz: In a market like India, where crypto regulation remains uncertain, how are you positioning Sikka.fun to stay compliant while still enabling open token creation? Regulatory clarity is still evolving globally, not just in India. Our approach is to focus on building technology that is transparent, auditable, and aligned with broader compliance expectations. Decentralized systems must coexist with regulatory frameworks, and the industry benefits when builders proactively engage with policymakers rather than operate in uncertainty. We are mindful of regional considerations and aim to design infrastructure that can adapt as regulatory clarity improves. Invezz: Data shows that only a tiny fraction of tokens on platforms like Pump.fun actually sustain value or “graduate” to broader markets. What gives you confidence that Sikka.fun won’t follow the same boom-bust pattern? It is realistic to expect that most tokens created experimentally will not persist long-term. However, the metric that matters is not how many tokens survive, but how many users continue participating in Web3 after their first interaction. If experimentation leads to deeper curiosity, education, and participation in decentralized ecosystems, then the onboarding layer has served its purpose. We are building for long-term ecosystem expansion, not short-term token survival rates. Invezz: If anyone can launch a token instantly, how do you prevent spam, manipulation, or outright scams without compromising decentralization? Open systems always face the challenge of balancing accessibility with responsibility. Our philosophy is that transparency and user awareness are powerful safeguards. Clear onchain visibility, improved discovery tools, and contextual information help users make more informed decisions. Over time, reputation layers, community signalling, and improved tooling can reduce bad behaviour without restricting openness. Decentralization does not mean absence of accountability; it means accountability is distributed. Invezz: How does Sikka.fun fit into the larger roadmap of Shardeum? Is this an onboarding funnel, a standalone product, or a core pillar of the ecosystem? Sikka.fun is best understood as an onboarding layer that introduces users to the broader Shardeum ecosystem. Every ecosystem needs an accessible first interaction. For some users, that may be a wallet, for others a game, for others a token experiment. Sikka.fun lowers the barrier to entry while connecting users to the larger network vision, scalable infrastructure enabling widespread participation in decentralized systems. It is not the destination, but an important entry point that helps expand the network effect. The post Interview: memecoins a gateway, not end goal, says Nischal Shetty on Sikka.fun appeared first on Invezz
22 Apr 2026, 11:05
Tesla joins race to lead voice assistant tech in Chinese EV market
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has filed its voice assistant, which runs on generative AI, with the cyberspace regulator in Shanghai. The feature is now among 158 AI-powered tools that have gone through China’s official registration process. The Shanghai Cyberspace Administration made the announcement on its official WeChat account. Musk’s Tesla has been trying hard to push up the leaderboards in China. However, the EV maker’s Full Self Driving feature is still awaiting regulatory approval for launch. The filing is not as big a China win for Tesla . It was a regulatory requirement. China’s Cyberspace Administration has been strict about AI tools. It requires companies to register generative AI features before they can legally run in the country. Hundreds of AI services had already passed through this process by the end of 2024. In fact, the announcement sent Tesla’s shares down. While the registration itself is a routine compliance step, investors got a red flag of a tightening regulatory environment that global automakers now face when deploying AI features in China. Still, the timing matters. Tesla is under growing pressure from Chinese rivals like BYD and Geely, which have been building out AI-driven in-car features at a fast pace. To stay competitive, Tesla is reportedly planning to fold in AI models from Chinese technology companies, DeepSeek for conversation and ByteDance’s Doubao for voice tasks like navigation and controlling the climate system. That marks a notable shift: rather than running a single global AI system, Tesla is now building a separate setup for China, one that works within local rules and connects to local platforms. Volkswagen and Rivian push deeper into AI Just a day before Tesla’s filing, Volkswagen also announced AI voice tech in China. The German automaker will be rolling out the feature across all of its cars in China by the second half of 2026. The system won’t be cloud-dependent as it runs directly on the car using a large language model stored on board. The technology is drawn from Tencent, Alibaba, and Baidu. Thomas Ulbrich, Volkswagen’s China chief technology officer, said the assistant is designed to read what drivers want before they ask, with a built-in sense of personality. Volkswagen also unveiled four vehicles at a Beijing media event, including a new model developed with Chinese EV maker Xpeng, a partnership built in just two years. The company also showed its first fully electric car in the FAW-Volkswagen ID. AURA line. Plans call for more than 20 new electric models to launch in China in 2026 alone. A more advanced agentic AI system, one that handles both driving assistance and cockpit controls together, is planned for next year. As part of the joint venture worth up to $5.8 billion, Rivian and VW have brought in Manasi Vartak as Vice President of AI and Data. She will be focusing on the Rivian Unified Intelligence platform and the Rivian Voice Assistant. Chief Software Officer Wassym Bensaid had promised delivery of the voice feature in early 2026. However, it was left out of the most recent over-the-air update. When voice commands go wrong While EV makers are pushing the voice features, a recent crash in China raises doubts about the complete safety of these systems. According to reports, a driver told the car, Lynk & Co Z20, to turn off the interior reading lights at night. But the voice feature glitched and turned the headlights off. The driver was also unable to get them back on before hitting a barrier on the road. On Weibo, the general manager of the car company Mu Jun made an apology and said the software was urgently being fixed. Now, the headlights can only be controlled manually while the car is moving. Similar problems have been occurring with other brands like Zeekar and Deepal. If you want a calmer entry point into DeFi crypto without the usual hype, start with this free video.
22 Apr 2026, 11:00
Bitcoin National Security Role Gains Momentum as US Admiral Endorses Its Strategic Value
BitcoinWorld Bitcoin National Security Role Gains Momentum as US Admiral Endorses Its Strategic Value A senior US military commander has publicly acknowledged Bitcoin as a valuable tool for national security. Admiral Samuel Paparo, head of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee on April 21. He described Bitcoin as a ‘valuable computer science tool’ with significant applications beyond finance. His remarks mark a notable shift in how top defense officials view digital assets. Bitcoin National Security Applications in Cybersecurity Admiral Paparo specifically highlighted Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work (PoW) technology. He explained that PoW imposes high computational costs on potential attackers. This mechanism, he argued, gives Bitcoin a unique role in cybersecurity. Unlike traditional systems, Bitcoin’s network requires immense energy to attack, making it costly and impractical for adversaries. This property, known as ‘cost to attack,’ is central to its security value. The admiral’s comments directly link Bitcoin’s technical design to national defense. He characterized Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer, trustless method for value transfer. This trustless nature reduces reliance on intermediaries, which can be vulnerable to compromise. For military and intelligence operations, such a system offers resilience. It allows value transfer without central points of failure, a critical feature in contested environments. Senator Tommy Tuberville posed the question that prompted these remarks. He noted that even China’s top monetary policy think tank now views Bitcoin as a strategic asset. This observation underscores a global trend. Nations are increasingly recognizing Bitcoin’s potential beyond investment. The senator asked how the U.S. should respond to this shift. Admiral Paparo’s answer was clear: he welcomes any technology that supports U.S. national power. Proof-of-Work as a Defensive Mechanism Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work consensus mechanism requires miners to solve complex mathematical problems. This process consumes significant energy and computing power. The same energy cost protects the network. An attacker would need to control more than 50% of the network’s hashing power, a feat costing billions of dollars. This economic barrier makes Bitcoin one of the most secure digital networks in existence. Admiral Paparo’s recognition of this property is significant. It moves the conversation from Bitcoin as a speculative asset to Bitcoin as a strategic technology. For national security agencies, securing communication and value transfer networks is paramount. Bitcoin offers a decentralized alternative that is inherently resistant to censorship and seizure. These characteristics align with military requirements for resilient infrastructure. The admiral’s testimony also touched on ‘power projection.’ In military terms, power projection refers to a nation’s ability to deploy and sustain forces globally. Bitcoin, as a global, permissionless network, enables value transfer across borders without traditional banking systems. This capability could support logistics, intelligence funding, or humanitarian aid in regions with weak financial infrastructure. Global Context: China’s Shift on Bitcoin Senator Tuberville’s reference to China’s think tank adds a geopolitical dimension. The People’s Bank of China has historically been hostile to cryptocurrencies. Yet its research arm now considers Bitcoin a strategic asset. This shift mirrors broader global trends. Countries like El Salvador have adopted Bitcoin as legal tender. Others, including the United States, are exploring central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). China’s stance is particularly relevant given its competition with the U.S. in the Indo-Pacific region. Admiral Paparo’s command oversees this area. His endorsement of Bitcoin as a tool for national power suggests a strategic calculus. The U.S. cannot afford to ignore a technology that rivals are exploring. The admiral’s comments may signal a broader policy reassessment within the Department of Defense. Table: Key Statements from Admiral Paparo’s Testimony Topic Statement Bitcoin’s Nature A valuable computer science tool Cybersecurity PoW imposes high costs on attackers Value Transfer Peer-to-peer, trustless method National Power Welcomes any technology supporting U.S. power Expert Perspectives on Bitcoin’s Defense Value Cybersecurity experts have long argued for Bitcoin’s defensive applications. The network’s immutability ensures that once a transaction is recorded, it cannot be altered. This feature is crucial for audit trails and supply chain integrity. For military logistics, tracking equipment and funds through an immutable ledger reduces fraud and errors. Admiral Paparo’s background adds weight to his statements. He commands the largest U.S. combatant command, covering 36 nations. His experience in the Pacific theater gives him firsthand knowledge of emerging threats. His endorsement of Bitcoin is not theoretical. It reflects practical considerations about how the U.S. can maintain technological superiority. Critics argue that Bitcoin’s energy consumption is a liability. However, proponents counter that this energy is a feature, not a bug. The cost secures the network. Moreover, Bitcoin mining increasingly uses renewable energy. The Bitcoin Mining Council reports that the network’s sustainable energy mix exceeds 58%. This aligns with military goals for energy efficiency and resilience. Implications for U.S. Policy Admiral Paparo’s testimony could influence defense policy. The Department of Defense has already explored blockchain for supply chain management. The admiral’s comments may accelerate these efforts. They also provide political cover for lawmakers to support Bitcoin-friendly legislation. Senator Tuberville, who asked the question, has been a vocal advocate for digital assets. The hearing occurred amid broader debates about cryptocurrency regulation. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has taken an enforcement-heavy approach. Yet defense perspectives like Paparo’s highlight Bitcoin’s strategic importance. This could shift the narrative from consumer protection to national security. Such a reframing might lead to more favorable policies. Resilience: Bitcoin’s decentralized network has no single point of failure. Cost: Attacking Bitcoin requires billions of dollars in computing power. Global Reach: Bitcoin operates 24/7 across borders without intermediaries. Transparency: All transactions are public and verifiable on the blockchain. Historical Context: Military Interest in Bitcoin This is not the first time military officials have shown interest in Bitcoin. In 2021, the U.S. Air Force awarded a contract to explore blockchain for data security. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has also funded blockchain research. Admiral Paparo’s public endorsement, however, is the highest-level acknowledgment to date. The timeline of Bitcoin’s adoption by defense communities is accelerating. Early adopters were primarily financial speculators. Now, technologists and strategists see its utility. The Senate hearing marks a turning point. It signals that Bitcoin’s national security applications are being taken seriously at the highest levels of government. Conclusion Admiral Samuel Paparo’s testimony represents a significant milestone for Bitcoin’s national security role. He explicitly linked Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work technology to cybersecurity and power projection. His comments reflect a growing recognition that Bitcoin is more than a financial asset. It is a strategic tool with applications in defense, logistics, and resilience. As global rivals explore similar technologies, the U.S. military’s embrace of Bitcoin could shape the future of national security policy. The admiral’s message is clear: Bitcoin is not just a currency; it is a capability. FAQs Q1: What did Admiral Paparo say about Bitcoin’s national security applications? A: He described Bitcoin as a valuable computer science tool, highlighting its Proof-of-Work technology for cybersecurity and its role as a trustless, peer-to-peer value transfer method for power projection. Q2: How does Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work enhance cybersecurity? A: PoW imposes high computational and energy costs on attackers, making it economically impractical to compromise the network. This creates a strong defensive barrier against cyber threats. Q3: Why did Senator Tuberville ask about Bitcoin during the hearing? A: Senator Tuberville noted that China’s top monetary policy think tank now views Bitcoin as a strategic asset. He asked how the U.S. should respond to this geopolitical development. Q4: What does ‘power projection’ mean in this context? A: Power projection refers to a nation’s ability to deploy and sustain military forces globally. Bitcoin’s permissionless, borderless nature enables value transfer in regions with weak financial infrastructure, supporting logistics and operations. Q5: Could this testimony lead to changes in U.S. cryptocurrency policy? A: Yes, it may shift the policy narrative from consumer protection to national security. This could encourage more favorable regulations for Bitcoin and blockchain technologies within defense and intelligence communities. This post Bitcoin National Security Role Gains Momentum as US Admiral Endorses Its Strategic Value first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
22 Apr 2026, 09:00
SpaceX strikes $60B Cursor agreement, united by a common adversary
_*]:min-w-0 gap-3 standard-markdown"> SpaceX has struck a deal giving it the right to buy AI coding startup Cursor for $60 billion later this year, or settle for a $10 billion working partnership, as Elon Musk’s company tries to close the gap with rivals in one of the fastest-moving corners of the technology industry. The announcement, made Tuesday in a post on X, puts one of Silicon Valley’s most talked-about startups squarely inside Musk’s expanding orbit, just months before SpaceX is expected to go public in what could be the largest stock market debut in history. Cursor, owned by parent company Anysphere and co-founded in early 2022 by four MIT students, Michael Truell, Aman Sanger, Sualeh Asif, and Arvid Lunnemark, builds tools that use artificial intelligence to help software developers write code faster. The company released its first product in March 2023, and within months, it had spread rapidly through the developer community. By November 2023, it had cataloged 150,000 codebases. In June 2024, it raised a $60 million in Series A funding led by Andreessen Horowitz. From zero to $2 billion in three years What followed was a funding streak rarely seen in enterprise software. Through 2025, Cursor raised three additional rounds totalling $3.3 billion. Its valuation opened 2025 at $2.5 billion and closed the year at $29.3 billion after a $2.3 billion Series D in November. Before that came a $900 million round in June 2025 when it was valued at $9.9 billion. The company is now in talks to raise another $2 billion at a valuation above $50 billion, with Andreessen Horowitz and Thrive Capital expected to co-lead, joined by Nvidia and Battery Ventures. “If you subtract out the dollars invested, it’s the fastest-growing company we’ve ever seen,” said Martin Casado, Andreessen Horowitz general partner and Cursor board member. Revenue has grown at a similar pace. Annualized revenue hit $500 million in May 2025, doubled to $1 billion by October, and crossed $2 billion in February 2026. Cursor says its tools are now used by 67% of the Fortune 500, including Uber and Adobe, and generate 150 million lines of enterprise code every day. Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, an investor and partner, told CNBC in October: “My favorite enterprise AI service is Cursor. Every one of our engineers, 100 percent, is now assisted by AI coders, and our productivity has gone up incredibly.” A fast rise now under pressure Yet the company’s quick growth has landed it in a difficult position. Anthropic launched Claude Code as a research preview in February 2025, and it caught on fast. By early 2026, Claude Code had a $2.5 billion annual run rate and more than 300,000 business customers. The difference between the two products is significant: Cursor helps developers write code faster, while Claude Code writes entire chunks of code on its own. “We invented agentic coding as a thing,” said Boris Cherny, Anthropic’s head of Claude Code. Social media has begun buzzing with the idea that Cursor is in trouble. One startup, Valon, publicly said in February it was moving off Cursor, setting off a wave of “Cursor is dead” commentary online. Some investors have noticed clients pulling back. Two of Cursor’s own engineers, Andrew Milich and Jason Ginsberg, left in March to join SpaceX and xAI. There is also a pricing problem. Cursor pays open-market rates to access AI models from Anthropic and OpenAI, the same companies competing directly against it. “Anthropic is trying to drown out Cursor,” one venture capitalist told Fortune. To reduce that reliance, Cursor has been developing its own model, called Composer, since 2025. Composer has outperformed Anthropic’s Opus 4.6 on some benchmarks, though Composer 2 came in behind OpenAI’s GPT 5.4. A Cursor blog post on Tuesday said model training had been “bottlenecked by compute” and that the SpaceX deal would let it “dramatically scale up” its models using xAI’s Colossus supercomputer cluster in Memphis. SpaceX, for its part, has its own reasons to move fast. The company filed IPO paperwork with the SEC in early April and plans a roadshow in early June. It merged with xAI in February in a deal valued at $1.25 trillion and is now seeking a $1.75 trillion valuation, which would make it the biggest IPO ever. It ended 2025 with $24.7 billion in cash. Cursor CEO Michael Truell, 25, said the deal was “a meaningful step on our path to build the best place to code with AI.” Whether SpaceX eventually buys the company or not, Truell has said he wants to build something that lasts. In an industry where everything changes every six months, that is a harder task than it sounds. Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank .
22 Apr 2026, 06:38
ICP price prediction 2026-2032: Is ICP a good investment?
Key takeaways: ICP is expected to attain a maximum price of $4.57 in 2026. Internet Computer protocol price forecast for 2029 expects the token to reach a peak price of $12.20. By 2032, the price of Internet Computer might reach a maximum of $19.82. Internet Computer (ICP) is a groundbreaking blockchain network developed by the DFINITY Foundation. It aims to extend the functionality of the internet, enabling it to host backend software and transforming it into a global, decentralized computer. Internet computer blockchain incorporates advanced cryptography and innovative technology to provide scalable, efficient, and secure decentralized applications (dApps). Given its robust technology and expanding utility, the Internet Computer blockchain’s future price prospects look promising. As more developers build on the platform and adoption increases, ICP token demand will likely rise. Does Internet Computer coin have a future? How much will Internet Computer coin cost in 2026? Will ICP reach $1000? Let’s get into the current price analysis and predictions. Overview Cryptocurrency Internet Computer Token ICP Price $2.54 Market Cap $1.383B Trading Volume $36.409M Circulating Supply 551.89M ICP All-time High $750.73 (May 10, 2021) All-time Low $2.02 (Feb 24, 2026) 24-h High $2.51 24-h Low $2.41 Internet Computer Network technical analysis Metric Value Volatility (30-day period) 4.83% (Medium) 14-Day RSI 50.32 (Neutral) 50-Day SMA $2.45 Sentiment Bearish Fear & Greed Index 33 (Fear) Green Days 13/30 (43%) 200-Day SMA $3.28 Internet Computer price analysis TL;DR Breakdown ICP bounced ~15% and reclaimed key support at $2.45. The 4-hour momentum is bullish and still building. A break above $2.66 would signal continuation to the upside, whereas failure to do so would likely result in a pullback toward $2.45. ICP 1-day price analysis As of April 22, ICP is trading around $2.52, rebounding roughly 12–15% from the recent low near $2.25, signaling a solid recovery phase after the prior downtrend. Price has reclaimed the mid Bollinger Band at $2.45, which now acts as support, confirming an improving structure. ICPUSDT 1-day price chart by TradingView However, price is now approaching the upper band near $2.66, where rejection has already started to appear. Recent candles show wicks and hesitation, suggesting supply is entering. MACD remains bullish with a positive histogram, but momentum is beginning to flatten slightly, indicating the move is losing some strength. If ICP breaks above $2.66, continuation toward $2.75–$2.80 becomes likely. Failure here would likely result in a pullback toward $2.45, with $2.25 as the deeper support if selling accelerates. ICP 4-hour price analysis Over the 4-hour period, ICP has pushed from ~$2.40 to $2.52, a ~5% move, and is now trading above the Alligator lines, which are starting to align bullishly. This suggests short-term trend control has shifted to buyers. ICPUSDT 4-hour price chart by TradingView The recent impulsive move followed by a small consolidation shows healthy structure, not exhaustion yet. MACD has crossed bullish again and is expanding, supporting continuation. Unlike the daily, momentum here is still building rather than fading. Key level to watch is $2.48–$2.50. Holding this keeps the bullish structure intact and opens the door to another push toward $2.60–$2.66. Losing it would weaken momentum and likely send the price back toward $2.40. ICP technical indicators: Levels and action Daily simple moving average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $2.45 BUY SMA 5 $2.53 BUY SMA 10 $2.50 BUY SMA 21 $2.42 BUY SMA 50 $2.45 BUY SMA 100 $2.66 SELL SMA 200 $3.28 SELL Daily exponential moving average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $2.47 BUY EMA 5 $2.48 BUY EMA 10 $2.48 BUY EMA 21 $2.46 BUY EMA 50 $2.48 BUY EMA 100 $2.70 SELL EMA 200 $3.29 SELL What to expect from ICP price analysis ICP is currently in a recovery trend with strengthening short-term bullish momentum, but it is approaching a strong resistance zone around $2.66. Unless this level is decisively broken, a pullback is likely. Is Internet Computer a good investment? The Internet Computer (ICP) has shown significant potential and volatility since its launch, which is common for relatively new and ambitious blockchain projects. Its technology aims to decentralize the internet and bring smart contract functionality to the web, which could have wide-ranging implications for the future of web speed. However, the market performance of ICP has been highly volatile, and its success depends heavily on the adoption of its technology and the broader market environment for cryptocurrencies. Please note that before you make an investment decision, seek independent professional consultation. Will Internet Computer reach $50? Yes, Internet Computer is expected to reach $50. Though the current internet computer sentiment is sideways, future price movements and market cap are expected to be positive. Will ICP reach $1000? Although its ATH sits at $750.73, attaining $1000 in the foreseeable future might be impossible. ICP is down 99% from its ATH and will require a massive turnaround in market fortunes to recapture previous highs. However, current price levels provide a good buying opportunity. Where can I buy Internet Computer? You can buy Internet Computer on the crypto market via Binance, Bybit, Coinbase Exchange, OKX, KuCoin, and more . Does Internet Computer have a good long-term future? Yes, the Internet Computer coin shows a promising long-term future. Price predictions indicate steady growth, with a potential increase year-on-year, reflecting a positive trend and strong market potential. Recent news/opinion on ICP Borrowing against Bitcoin – without bridging or wrapping – is now possible on ICP. Borrowing against Bitcoin – without bridging or wrapping – is now possible on ICP. @LiquidiumFi just made it happen. In this walkthrough, Robin (CEO) shows exactly how to borrow USDT on Ethereum using native Bitcoin as collateral, step by step. This is what native… — DFINITY Foundation (@dfinity) April 8, 2026 ICP is the most used blockchain in Web3 🌐 The most used blockchains in Web3 These networks have processed billions of transactions on mainnet, driving real on-chain usage around the world Here are the 25 busiest blockchains by total lifetime transactions 📊 https://t.co/H0EufFEDl3 pic.twitter.com/yM3etU3NHY — Chainspect (@chainspect_app) March 10, 2026 Internet Computer price prediction April 2026 In April 2026, ICP (Internet Computer) is expected to see a price range with a minimum of $2.25, an average of $2.55, and a maximum of $2.86. Month Minimum price Average price Maximum price ICP price prediction April 2026 $2.25 $2.55 $2.86 Internet Computer price prediction 2026 For 2026, ICP’s price is projected to range between a minimum of $2.50 and a maximum of $5.89, with an average estimate of $4.03. Year Minimum price Average price Maximum price ICP price prediction 2026 $2.05 $3.81 $4.57 Internet Computer price predictions 2027 – 2032 Year Minimum Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2027 $4.59 $6.35 $7.11 2028 $7.13 $8.89 $9.66 2029 $9.67 $11.43 $12.20 2030 $10.21 $12.98 $14.74 2031 $13.75 $15.52 $17.28 2032 $15.30 $17.06 $19.82 Internet Computer price forecast 2027 Projections suggest that in 2027, the Internet Computer (ICP) coin could peak at $7.11, with a minimum forecast of $4.59 and an average price of around $6.35. Internet Computer token price prediction 2028 In 2028, ICP could potentially reach a high of $9.66, with a projected low of around $7.13 and an average trading price of approximately $8.89. Internet Computer ICP price prediction 2029 The 2029 forecast indicates that ICP could reach up to $12.20, with an average price of $11.43 and a minimum expected around $9.67. Internet Computer ICP price prediction 2030 In 2030, ICP is expected to fluctuate between $10.21 and $14.74, with an average projected price of $12.98. Internet Computer ICP price prediction 2031 Predictions suggest that the price of ICP could potentially reach a peak of $17.28 by 2031, with a projected minimum of around $13.75 and an average of approximately $15.52. Internet Computer price prediction 2032 In 2032, analysts suggest a maximum price of $19.82 for ICP. Traders and investors can anticipate an average price of $17.06 and a minimum price of $15.30. Internet Computer ICP price prediction 2026 – 2032 Internet Computer market price prediction: Analysts’ ICP price forecast Firm Name 2026 2027 Changelly $4.90 $2.57 Digitalcoinprice $8.86 $6.90 Coincodex $2.62 $2.49 Cryptopolitan’s Internet Computer (ICP) price prediction Cryptopolitan’s Internet Computer prediction showcases a gradual upward trajectory. In 2026, ICP is forecasted to range between $2 and $6, averaging around $3.5. Subsequent years show increasing potential, with projections for 2027 aiming at a maximum of $7.81 and averaging $5.20. By 2032, Cryptopolitan anticipates ICP could peak at $20, with an average price of around $14. Internet Computer historic price sentiment ICP price history by Coingecko ICP began trading in June at $49.75. It peaked at $128.43 from June to August and dropped to $37.61. It fluctuated between $39.53 and $45.15 from September to November, ending November at $38.18. From December to February 2022, it ranged from $18.14 to $24.64. From March to August 2022, ICP declined significantly from $14.55 to $5.66. Between September and November, it continued to drop, ending at $3.52 in November. From March to November 2023, ICP prices fluctuated between $2.88 and $6.49, ending November at $3.77. From December 2023 to February 2024, ICP rose to $12.58 before closing February at $10.56. Between March and May, it ranged from $10.70 to $13.98, ending May at $11.21. June to August saw fluctuations between $5.88 and $13.00, while September traded around $9.55–$9.98. ICP peaked at $8.66 in October, averaged $12.20 in November, and started December strong at $12.44 before dropping 20% to close the year at $9.88. In January 2025, Internet Computer peaked at $12.5 but soon fell, hitting a low of $5.9 in February. In April, ICP maintained an average of $5.03, and in June, it traded between $4.34 and $6.31. July saw a high of $6.25 and a low of $4.67. In August, ICP maintained a trading range of $4.61 to $6.08, and in September, the coin traded at an average price of $4.65. In November, ICP traded between $3.58 and $9.73, and in December 2025, the coin is traded between $2.67 and $3.75. In January 2026, the coin traded between $2.59 and $4.78, and in February, it traded between $2.02 and $2.69. In March, ICP traded between $2.17 and $2.84, and in April, it is trading at an average price of $2.4.
22 Apr 2026, 02:14
US admiral calls Bitcoin an instrument for US ‘power projection’
US Navy Admiral Samuel Paparo said Bitcoin’s proof-of-work technology has "really important" computer science applications when it comes to cybersecurity.
