hodler

11 Mar 2026, 08:16

Brera board approves Solmate pivot, cuts soccer teams to focus on Solana

Nasdaq-listed Brera plans to rebrand as Solmate, wind down two soccer teams and propose a 10-for-1 reverse stock split as it pivots toward Solana.

25 Feb 2026, 18:46

Why OM trading is paused: Inside MANTRA’s rebrand, coin upgrade, and exchange suspensions

MANTRA’s OM token is undergoing a major chain upgrade and rebrand, prompting Coinbase to suspend OM perpetual futures trading.

25 Feb 2026, 17:14

OM price soars amid MANTRA chain upgrade, rebrand

OM is in the spotlight after posting strong gains as the MANTRA ecosystem moves toward a major chain upgrade and token rebrand. The token recently climbed by nearly 6% in 24 hours, trading around $0.066, with daily volume surging past $30 million. MANTRA (OM) price chart | Source: Coingecko That spike in activity comes as the project prepares to complete its transition from OM to MANTRA, a move that will reshape the token’s structure and identity. The rally suggests that traders are positioning ahead of the upgrade. It also reflects renewed attention around the project’s long-term direction. MANTRA upgrade and 1:4 token swap The MANTRA team has confirmed that OM will officially transition to MANTRA under a structured upgrade plan scheduled for completion in early March 2026. At the centre of the shift is a 1:4 token redenomination. For every one OM token held, users will receive four MANTRA tokens. The process is designed to be non-dilutive, meaning the overall value of holdings will not change simply because of the swap. Instead, the supply count adjusts while maintaining proportional ownership. The rebrand also marks the final move away from the older ERC-20 version of OM. MANTRA is consolidating around its native chain to simplify liquidity and eliminate confusion caused by multiple token formats. Holders on supported exchanges will see their balances converted automatically once the swap is executed. Those holding OM in private wallets on Ethereum or other EVM networks are required to migrate tokens before the deadline to remain eligible for the upgrade and avoid holding unsupported or stranded tokens after the conversion window closes. This structured migration has drawn attention from major exchanges, several of which have already confirmed support for the swap and rebranding process. As a result, deposits and withdrawals on various crypto exchanges are expected to be paused temporarily around the snapshot date to ensure a smooth transition. Market reaction and price momentum Although the old MANTRA native token, OM, remains down sharply from its all-time high of $8.99 reached in February 2025, the current rebound places it well above its October 2023 low near $0.017. The tight chart timeframes show a clear pickup in momentum over the past two weeks. Seven-day gains have reached double digits, while the 14-day rise has been even stronger. That acceleration aligns closely with renewed discussion around the token swap and final upgrade timeline. Market capitalisation currently sits just under $80 million, with a circulating supply of more than 1.17 billion OM. While the token’s unlimited maximum supply remains a point of debate among investors, especially in a market that often favours capped assets, the immediate narrative is currently focused on the execution of the upgrade. Investors appear to be weighing the risk of holding deprecated tokens against the opportunity presented by a unified chain and brand identity. But whether the upgrading will translate into sustained price appreciation will depend on adoption, liquidity, and broader market conditions. For now, traders are responding to clarity. The defined swap ratio, the confirmed timeline, and exchange coordination have reduced uncertainty. As the countdown to the March 2026 conversion continues, volatility is likely to remain elevated, although the momentum is clearly on the side of the bulls at the moment. The post OM price soars amid MANTRA chain upgrade, rebrand appeared first on Invezz

17 Feb 2026, 11:30

Zashi Becomes Zodl: Zcash Wallet Rebrands Following Internal Split

Zashi, the flagship mobile wallet built by Zcash’s original engineering team, is rebranding to “Zodl” as its developers formally operate outside the Electric Coin Company (ECC) structure. The change matters less as a cosmetic refresh than as a signal: the same builders are continuing product work, but under a new corporate banner after a governance rupture that spilled into public view in early January. Zcash Wallet Zashi Renamed Zodl In a post on X dated Feb. 16, the wallet team said the next app update will rename Zashi to Zodl “without impacting the user experience,” stressing there is “no action required” from users. “It’s a new brand for a new chapter, but everything else stays the same: the wallet, the team behind it, and our commitment to Zcash,” the announcement read. “We’re moving forward with clarity and purpose, and this change reflects the building momentum.” The post also tied the rebrand to a broader organizational reset. “In January of this year, the entire Electric Coin Company (ECC) team, the original creators of Zcash and Zashi, left ECC and formed a new company,” it said, naming the new entity Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) and positioning Zodl as the “Zcash flagship wallet.” The team framed the move as a way to pursue growth “without reliance on the Zcash development fund,” while keeping continuity on shipping and support. On mission, the wallet team used language that will be familiar to long-time Zcash followers, explicitly anchoring the product roadmap to privacy-first payments. “We envision a world without mass financial surveillance. A world where law-abiding people can transact freely and privately, without fear that their data will be exploited or weaponized,” the post said. “There is no sovereignty without privacy. Our banner has changed, but our mission has not.” The immediate practical effect for users is limited: the same app is expected to update in place, with branding changes rolling out across channels, including the Discord support presence. The more consequential change is governance and ownership context: the wallet is now explicitly presented as a product of ZODL rather than ECC, after weeks of public dispute about who could control, finance, and potentially commercialize consumer-facing efforts around Zashi . The Background Story The break traces back to a late-2025 clash between ECC leadership and Bootstrap , the 501(c)(3) nonprofit that governs ECC. In early January, former ECC CEO Josh Swihart said board actions left the team no viable path inside the existing structure. “Unfortunately, decisions made by four of Bootstrap’s board members forced every person at ECC to exit the company, very quickly,” Swihart wrote on the Zcash Community Forum on Jan. 9. “I wish we hadn’t been forced to move so quickly. But we had no choice. This is a serious matter. It is not a game. And as you see, the consequences, severe.” Bootstrap, for its part, has argued the flashpoint was a proposed transaction to move Zashi into a for-profit structure and attract outside capital, which it says had to be handled as a related-party deal involving nonprofit-controlled assets. In a public statement and accompanying timeline, Bootstrap described talks around external investment and “alternative structures to privatize Zashi” intensifying in late October 2025, then accelerating in December amid rushed deadlines, incomplete documentation, and legal constraints tied to nonprofit fiduciary duties. The timeline states that matters “rapidly escalated” around Dec. 20 when the board was presented with a Jan. 1 deadline to approve a deal, followed by leadership departures in early January and the broader team exit shortly after. At press time, Zcash traded at $284.34.

27 Jan 2026, 15:14

Moltbot founder denies involvement in meme coins after scammers exploit Clawdbot rebrand

Peter Steinberger, the developer who previously built PSPDFKit and is now behind the viral AI assistant Clawdbot, which has now rebranded to Moltbot, took to X to denounce what he described as harassment from “crypto folks” attempting to link him to unauthorized meme coins. “Please stop pinging me, stop harassing me. I will never do a coin,” Steinberger wrote , adding that any project listing him as a coin owner is a scam. The controversy erupted after Anthropic , the company behind Claude AI, forced Steinberger to rename his project from Clawdbot to Moltbot over trademark concerns. During the transition, crypto opportunists seized the organization’s GitHub and X renames, according to Steinberger’s account of events. Within hours, fake CLAWD tokens and different variations of the rebranded name were created and distributed, with one already having a market cap of over $8.48 million and a trade volume of over $17 million, as seen on GMGN.AI as of the time of writing. What happened during Clawdbot’s rebranding? In a post explaining the situation, Steinberger wrote, “Had to rename our accounts for trademark stuff and messed up the GitHub rename, and the X rename got snatched by crypto shills.” Steinberger later clarified that the name change was not voluntary. “Crypto folks: I was forced to rename the account by Anthropic. Wasn’t my decision,” he stated. The original Clawdbot account no longer exists, as it seems the X team has taken it down. However, it created an opening for individuals promoting cryptocurrency schemes, a development that has caused confusion among the project’s legitimate user base and opened the door for scammers to falsely associate Steinberger with token launches. Viral project becomes scam magnet Clawdbot, which Steinberger named after his AI assistant “Clawd,” had achieved remarkable organic growth before the controversy. The open-source project garnered 9,000 GitHub stars within 24 hours of launch and crossed 60,000 stars by day three, making it one of the fastest-growing developer tools in recent memory. The self-hosted AI assistant allows users to run an AI agent locally with full system access, integrating with multiple messaging platforms, including WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, and Discord. Its popularity and that of the founder may have made it an attractive target for crypto scammers looking to capitalize on viral technology trends. However, due to trademark reasons, the project had to be rebranded and is now known as Moltbot. What is Steinberger saying regarding the project? The Moltbot founder has made it clear that he would not accept any fees or compensation related to cryptocurrency projects. “You are actively damaging the project,” he told those continuing to associate him with tokens. The Moltbot project continues under its new branding, though the incident has raised questions about the vulnerability of technology founders to cryptocurrency-related harassment and impersonation. Steinberger himself has posted an update on the recovery of his GitHub account, clarifying that it was his personal account that was hijacked and has now been recovered. He wrote , “GitHub’s resolved. This only affected my personal account, not the org (messed up the rename).” He stated that it will take another day to resolve the X account issue, adding that the original X handle is @moltbot and “not any of the 20 scam variations of it.” Steinberger also informed users that they do not need to do anything for the next release, as the update will work just as before. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .