hodler

29 Jan 2026, 13:50

Cere Network execs face $100M lawsuit over fraud, racketeering, and token dumping

A group of investors filed a $100 million lawsuit on Tuesday in a US federal court against executives of the San Francisco blockchain data project Cere Network. The complaint accuses insiders of fraud, racketeering, and orchestrating a token dump after the 2021 launch. According to the plaintiffs, the business prospects, token restrictions, and customer traction of the project were being misled by Cere Network and its CEO, Fred Jin. The founder of Cere was identified as the perpetrator in the lawsuit. However, there were many other defendants as well. Cere Network faked promises and investor roles In the court filing, the plaintiffs claimed the project pitched a vision of a decentralized data storage platform operating within independent servers. Cere presented the system as a solution to the insatiable demand for secure cloud data services, which would also run on a proprietary digital asset, the CERE Token. The complaint says investors were told the token would power payments and governance on the platform. They were also informed that the token would seek listings on exchanges such as Binance , with proceeds from token sales used to fund infrastructure development. One plaintiff, Lujunjin “Vivian” Liu of Cupertino, says she was introduced to Jin and his plans for the data network. Liu was recruited as a senior strategic advisor and told that her compensation would be made in CERE tokens. From 2019 through 2021, Liu says she devoted up to 20 hours per week to the new venture’s fundraising, investor outreach, and token planning ahead of the public sale. She also invested personally and through Goopal Digital Ltd., an affiliated investment firm. Cere raised about $50 million through private and public token sales in November 2021, the complaint states. The project’s investors were told that insider tokens would be subject to lockups to purportedly prevent insiders from selling their holdings and protect CERE’s market stability. But the plaintiffs insist those assurances were false, as insiders began selling large quantities of tokens soon after trading began, causing a steep price slump. CERE made a market debut at $0.45 but fell to around $0.06 after weeks of trading. As of Thursday, it was trading near $0.0003384, down more than 99% from its all-time high. While employees and outside investors were subject to lockups, the complaint says Jin and associates were not bound in practice. They allegedly sold more than $41 million in tokens on public exchanges shortly after launch and transferred the proceeds into personal cryptocurrency wallets. Goopal and Liu also allege that millions of dollars raised for Cere were moved into shell entities and accounts linked to Jin and partners. Moreover, the plaintiffs argue that Jin used automated bots from Gotbit Ltd. to engage in wash trading. The US Department of Justice convicted Gotbit’s founder of wire fraud and market manipulation in June last year, Cryptopolitan reported . Liu and Goopal are seeking $25 million in compensatory damages and $75 million in punitive damages. Cere Network CEO is facing another lawsuit and internal control allegations The federal case comes against the backdrop of another law charge filed two weeks earlier in Delaware. Cerebellum Networks co-founder Ken Wang filed suit in the Court of Chancery against the same defendants, claiming they diverted about $58 million in Cere token assets. Cerebellum was established in January 2019 after raising approximately $42.9 million from private investors and token sales between 2019 and 2021. The funds were intended to build and operate the Cere Network platform. Wang alleges that “secret token dumps” began immediately after the November 8, 2021, ICO. He claims roughly $41.78 million in tokens moved from the company treasury to exchanges. These tokens were sold through accounts controlled by Jin and others, despite their claims that project-allocated tokens were “locked.” The Delaware complaint also indicates that at least $16.6 million was stolen from a Regulation D fundraising wallet. The money, allegedly from Republic’s US investors, was sent to two unknown personal wallets. They were used for crypto trading, resulting in losses of about $9.78 million. Jin is alleged to have gained control of more than 86% of the financial documents as he tricked shareholders and advisors with misleading financial information. This included fake financial reports, understated fundraising amounts, and misrepresentations of multi-signature wallet information. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .

29 Jan 2026, 05:10

Worldcoin surged 7.61% after reports linked OpenAI’s biometric social network plans to World ID.

World Network’s WLD token jumped 7.61% after OpenAI was reportedly investigating a biometric social network to authenticate users and restrict accounts created by artificial intelligence. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, co-founded the cryptocurrency project World, which raised $135 million in a token sale last year from a16z and Bain Capital Crypto. The project’s basic idea is World ID. This decentralized, privacy-focused identity system uses the orb, a specially designed biometric device that complies with privacy regulations by scanning users’ irises to provide unique identities. The token surged 7.61% to $0.5291 after the report. Data from CoinMarketCap showed that the token’s 24-hour trading volume increased sharply by 763% to $645.76 million, momentarily outpacing most major cryptocurrencies even as it didn’t confirm any official cooperation between OpenAI and World. World Network faces scrutiny as biometric identity gains traction Since its debut on July 24, 2023, the World Network has attracted both interest and criticism. Despite the project’s claims to have validated millions of people globally, it has encountered regulatory resistance, including a temporary ban in Kenya and questions about its processing of personal data in the United Kingdom. However, the concept of linking biometric verification to online identification is still gaining popularity, particularly as generative AI technologies bombard social media with false content and spam. In light of this, focus is now turning to OpenAI itself. According to Forbes, OpenAI is discreetly developing a biometric-based social network to eliminate bot activity on popular platforms like X. Forbes reported , citing people familiar with the matter, that fewer than 10 individuals are working on the software, which may include a biometric identification component. The World Orb, a cantaloupe-sized eyeball scanner that uses a person’s iris to create a unique, verifiable ID, and Apple’s Face ID have been considered by the team as “proof of personhood.” All accounts on OpenAI’s social network would be authenticated by true biometric verification. However, since iris scans are permanent and might be disastrous in the wrong hands, privacy advocates have cautioned about the dangers of identity verification systems like World’s. Sources stated that users could use AI to create content, such as photographs or movies, on the new software, although it was unclear how the social network would enhance OpenAI’s current product line. Notably, OpenAI’s social network does not yet have a launch schedule, and sources warned that things could change significantly before it is ready to be shown to the public. The Verge reported in April of last year that OpenAI was working on a social network that resembles the X platform. Bots undermine trust and authenticity on X Bot accounts have been a problem on social networks for a long time. These accounts usually imitate human interaction. Specific issue on Twitter, which was made much worse when Elon Musk bought the company, changed its name to X, and fired almost 80% of its employees. This destroyed the trust and safety team responsible for removing bots from the platform and moderating messages. Notably, Musk vowed war on bots before purchasing Twitter. In an effort to cut down on reply spam, on October 12, Head of Product Nikita Bier revealed that X had eliminated 1.7 million automated accounts that were clogging reply areas with spam, including cryptocurrency solicitations and repetitive advertisements. The effort sought to enhance user experience by emphasizing real interactions. Users’ responses ranged from applause for cleaner conversations to concerns about the efficacy of the purge and possible errors in some automated processes. However, they are still an issue. Altman, who has been using X often since 2008, has been open about how frustrated he is with the bots on the platform. “Somehow AI Twitter/AI Reddit feels very fake in a way it really didn’t a year or two ago,” he wrote on X in September of last year. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

28 Jan 2026, 18:22

MegaETH mainnet to go live Feb. 9 in major test of ‘real-time’ Ethereum scaling

This follows its October 2025 $450 million token sale that was heavily oversubscribed.

28 Jan 2026, 18:22

1inch denies involvement in 14 million token sale that sent 1INCH to record lows

The 1inch team has issued an official statement on X denying any involvement in the sale of 14 million 1INCH, its native cryptocurrency, an action that led to the token crashing to its all-time low on Tuesday, January 27. Its statement on X read, “With respect to yesterday’s activity, no 1INCH was sold from wallets controlled by 1inch entities or our team, or our treasury multisigs. We do not control third-party holdings or their trading decisions.” The 14 million token disposal worth $1.83 million triggered a market panic and caused the token to hit a downward trend. However, it began to show signs of recovery during the late hours of January 27, trading around $0.12 after hitting a record low of $0.1127. However, that rally was short-lived, as it resumed its downward trend until the 1inch team released its public statement denying any involvement with the token sale . The token has gone up a bit and now trades at around $0.116, as of the time of writing. The clarification comes after on-chain analyst Ember tracked the transaction to an address that had received 15 million 1INCH through vesting unlocks approximately one year ago. 1inch team pledges to review tokenomics In the same statement, 1inch informed its community that it plans to review aspects of its tokenomics structure in 2026, stating, “1inch Network this year plans to review aspects of its tokenomics to further strengthen resilience during market downturns and times of low liquidity.” The team provided no specific details about proposed changes , but the announcement signals that it is an acknowledgment that some parts of its current token distribution model need updating, with one X user recommending that they review their token holder benefits, adding that Hyperliquid is doing similar and does it right. The 1inch team stated that their mission and vision remain unchanged, writing, “It is that focus which has pushed our total swap volume to almost $800B since 2019 and allows us to sustain hundreds of millions in daily volume even during bear markets. 1inch is as strong today as ever.” The team highlighted its global workforce of 170 employees powering swap infrastructure across leading wallets and applications, positioning the protocol as a core component of the decentralized finance ecosystem. What is the current state of 1INCH? Trading activity as seen on CoinMarketCap suggests a degree of stabilization, with 24-hour volume currently at around $61.2 million, a 3.8% rise. The increased activity reflects both heightened volatility and renewed interest following the team’s public response, though the token remained down more than 98% from its $7.87 all-time high recorded in 2021. The market capitalization is currently around $165 million. Community reaction to the statement was mixed, with most investors welcoming the planned tokenomics review and the team’s clarification, while others pressed for more immediate answers about who controlled the selling address and why they chose to liquidate such a substantial position at multi-year lows. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

27 Jan 2026, 23:55

Russia Crypto News Ban: The Alarming Crackdown Blocking Major Financial Media Outlets

BitcoinWorld Russia Crypto News Ban: The Alarming Crackdown Blocking Major Financial Media Outlets MOSCOW, RUSSIA – March 2025. In a significant escalation of digital control, Russia’s telecommunications regulator, Roskomnadzor, has enforced a sweeping block on access to numerous prominent cryptocurrency news websites for users on residential internet connections within the country. This Russia crypto news ban directly impacts platforms like Cointelegraph, Bitcoin World, and Benzinga, marking a pivotal moment in the state’s approach to financial information and media oversight. Consequently, this action creates immediate barriers for Russian investors and enthusiasts seeking independent analysis on digital assets. Understanding the Russia Crypto News Ban and Its Immediate Impact Reports from international financial media outlet BeInCrypto confirm the inaccessibility of several key websites. The list of blocked crypto news platforms is extensive and includes both global giants and regional specialists. For instance, affected sites range from Bitcoin World and CoinGeek to FXEmpire, FastBull, and Criptonoticias. Furthermore, major industry staples like Cointelegraph, CoinEdition, The Coin Republic, AMBCrypto, and Nada News are also now unreachable through standard Russian ISP connections. This move represents a clear intensification of Roskomnadzor’s regulatory actions within the cryptocurrency media sphere. Roskomnadzor, formally known as the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media, maintains the country’s Unified Register of Prohibited Information. Websites typically enter this registry for allegedly disseminating prohibited content, which can include calls for illegal activity, extremist materials, or information violating other Russian laws. The specific legal justification cited for these latest blocks remains undisclosed by the regulator at this time. However, this pattern of action aligns with a broader, established trend of tightening control over financial and economic discourse online. Historical Context and the Pattern of Media Regulation This is not an isolated incident but part of a longer narrative of internet governance. Roskomnadzor has previously restricted access to websites discussing cryptocurrencies, often linking them to potential risks for citizens. For example, in past years, the regulator has blocked pages of foreign crypto exchanges and initial coin offering (ICO) platforms. The agency frequently cites the need to protect consumers from fraudulent schemes and unregulated financial instruments as a primary motivator. Therefore, the current block on news outlets suggests a strategic expansion from targeting direct financial services to influencing the informational landscape itself. The regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies in Russia has been notably complex and often contradictory. While the government has explored the potential for digital assets in international trade to circumvent sanctions, domestic policies have frequently emphasized control and restriction. The “On Digital Financial Assets” law, which came into effect, provided a basic legal framework but left significant ambiguity. This legal ambiguity allows regulatory bodies like Roskomnadzor and the Central Bank of Russia considerable discretion in their enforcement actions, particularly regarding information flow. Expert Analysis on Information Control Strategies Financial censorship experts point to a global trend where states seek to manage the narrative around decentralized technologies. Dr. Anya Petrova, a senior researcher at the Center for Internet and Society, explains, “Controlling the narrative is a precursor to controlling the activity. By limiting access to independent crypto news and analysis, authorities can shape domestic perception, potentially steering users toward state-sanctioned information sources or discouraging engagement altogether.” This strategy impacts price discovery, investment education, and awareness of global regulatory shifts for Russian citizens. The technical implementation of such blocks usually involves ISPs complying with orders to blacklist specific domain names and IP addresses. Savvy users often employ virtual private networks (VPNs) or the Tor browser to circumvent these restrictions. However, Roskomnadzor has also invested in advanced deep packet inspection (DPI) technology to identify and throttle VPN traffic. This creates a technological arms race between regulators and citizens seeking unrestricted access to information. The table below outlines the core dynamics of this conflict. Regulatory Action Typical User Countermeasure Potential Next Step for Regulator Domain/IP Blocking Using VPNs or Proxy Servers DPI to throttle encrypted traffic Search Engine Delisting Using foreign search engines (e.g., Google) Promoting domestic alternatives (e.g., Yandex) Legal Pressure on Content Creators Accessing decentralized or mirror sites Broader legislation targeting circumvention tools Broader Implications for the Cryptocurrency Ecosystem The immediate effect of this Russia crypto news ban is a fragmented information environment. Russian traders, developers, and enthusiasts face increased difficulty accessing real-time market analysis, project updates, and security advisories. This information asymmetry can lead to several negative outcomes: Increased Vulnerability: Without access to reputable news sources, users may fall prey to scams or poorly vetted projects promoted on unblocked, less-regulated platforms. Market Inefficiency: Limited news flow can delay the incorporation of global events into local trading strategies, potentially creating arbitrage opportunities for those with external information access. Innovation Stagnation: Developers and entrepreneurs may find it harder to stay abreast of technical advancements and regulatory trends in other jurisdictions, hindering local innovation. Globally, this action signals to other nations considering similar measures that blocking informational websites is a technically feasible step. It also raises questions about the future of financial journalism in increasingly digital and regulated economies. Media outlets themselves must now consider operational risks, including the potential for their reporters to face legal challenges or for their platforms to be excluded from significant regional audiences. The Geopolitical Dimension of Financial Information This development cannot be divorced from the wider geopolitical context. Since 2022, Russia has faced extensive international sanctions affecting its traditional financial systems. Cryptocurrencies have been viewed by some analysts as a potential tool for mitigating these restrictions. By controlling the domestic narrative around crypto, authorities may aim to manage how these tools are perceived and used, ensuring they align with state interests rather than individual circumvention. This creates a paradox where the technology is simultaneously explored for state use and restricted for public discourse. Conclusion The Russia crypto news ban enacted by Roskomnadzor represents a significant hardening of the state’s approach to financial media and information sovereignty. By blocking access to a wide swath of international and niche cryptocurrency news websites, the regulator is directly influencing the information landscape for millions of citizens. This move fits within a historical pattern of internet governance focused on control and consumer protection rationales. The long-term consequences will likely include a more isolated domestic crypto community, increased reliance on circumvention tools, and a potential chilling effect on financial journalism. Ultimately, this event underscores the critical, yet often contested, role of free information flow in the development and adoption of transformative digital asset technologies. FAQs Q1: Which specific cryptocurrency news websites did Russia block? The blocked sites include Bitcoin World, Benzinga, FastBull, FXEmpire, CoinGeek, Criptonoticias, Cointelegraph, CoinEdition, The Coin Republic, AMBCrypto, and Nada News, among others, as reported by BeInCrypto. Q2: Why would Roskomnadzor block crypto news sites? While official reasons are often not fully detailed, the regulator typically cites the need to protect consumers from unregulated financial risks, fraudulent schemes, or information that allegedly violates Russian law. The action aligns with broader efforts to control the domestic narrative around financial technologies. Q3: Can users in Russia still access these blocked websites? Access via standard residential internet service providers (ISPs) is blocked. However, technically adept users often employ tools like Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) or the Tor browser to circumvent such restrictions, though Roskomnadzor actively works to detect and throttle some VPN traffic. Q4: Has Russia blocked crypto websites before? Yes. Roskomnadzor has a history of blocking websites related to cryptocurrencies, including foreign exchange platforms and ICO websites, often on grounds of containing prohibited information or posing risks to consumers. Q5: What does this mean for cryptocurrency adoption in Russia? It creates a more challenging environment for informed public participation. By restricting access to independent news and analysis, the move may slow mainstream adoption, increase information asymmetry between ordinary users and professionals, and potentially push activity toward less transparent channels or state-influenced narratives. This post Russia Crypto News Ban: The Alarming Crackdown Blocking Major Financial Media Outlets first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

27 Jan 2026, 20:30

Ethereum Just Hit A Hidden Threshold That Often Precedes Explosive Moves

The second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, Ethereum, appears to have quietly crossed an important critical threshold that has historically signaled major price expansions. While the Ethereum price action may still appear calm on the surface, underlying market structure and flow dynamics suggest a meaningful shift is underway. This type of transition typically occurs when accumulation replaces distribution, volatility compresses, and smart money positions ahead of broader market recognition. A Silent Shift That Usually Comes Before Violent Expansion Ethereum just crossed a quiet but massive threshold. Trader and investor Shuarix has mentioned on X that Zama has gone live with the first fully encrypted Initial Coin Offering (ICO) ever executed on the ETH mainnet, moving a confidential USDT and running a sealed-bid Dutch auction entirely on encrypted data. Related Reading: Ethereum Gains Institutional Support, Though ETH Price Outlook Remains Contested In just 3 days, more than $118 million was committed, over $100 million was shielded, and the auction was 218% oversubscribed with more than 11,000 verified bidders. At peak activity, the Zama application became the most-used app on ETH, surpassing both USDT and Uniswap during the event, with zero downtime and full ETH-level throughout. Crypto analyst Milk Road revealed that BitMine Immersion Technologies has made a large purchase of 40,302 ETH in a single move, which brings their total stack holdings to a massive 4,243,338 ETH, worth over $12.3 billion at the current price. In perspective, the company now controls 3.52% of the entire ETH circulating supply, and they’re not just letting it sit idle. According to Milk Road, BitMine has over 2 million ETH tokens already staked, generating $180 million in annualized rewards. This means the company is not just playing the buy-and-hold game, but compounding its position at scale, which is all well and good for BitMine. Meanwhile, this sustained buying pressure will help create a price floor for the long-term ETH holders. Furthermore, this move is the type of institutional accumulation that will keep ETH moving inside its ascending channel. Thus, this will help to pull the price back into that channel after the macro shocks temporarily push it out. “Below is the 2025 tariff shock. While the headlines try to muddy your view of things, this chart will tell the real story,” Milk Road noted. Accumulation Continues Despite Price Being Near Entry Levels The realized price of the Ethereum accumulation address is acting as a major support level. A crypto investor known as CW has also pointed out that ETH has only reached this realized price once in history, which is very similar to the current price range. Related Reading: Ethereum Stalls In A Critical Zone As Breakout Structures Wait For Confirmation However, the whale’s purchase price for ETH is not significantly different from the current price. Despite that, their ETH accumulation is increasing, indicating that whales still view the current price as fair value. This shows that they are preparing for an upward trend. Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com