News
29 Jan 2026, 14:00
Ethereum Price Prediction: Is ETH Doomed After Another Rejection at $3K?

Ethereum remains in a corrective and compressive phase, with price action increasingly tightening between descending resistance and a well-defined demand zone. Both the higher and lower timeframes suggest that ETH is approaching a critical decision point, where directional expansion is likely to follow the current compression. Ethereum Price Analysis: The Daily Chart On the daily timeframe, Ethereum continues to trade below a dominant descending trendline that has capped its price since the previous major high. Multiple rejection points along this trendline confirm its technical significance, reinforcing it as a primary dynamic resistance. The asset is also trading below both the 100-day and 200-day moving averages, with the 100-day MA of $3.1K already sloping downward and exerting downward pressure on the price action, while the 200-day MA sits higher and continues to act as a broader trend filter. The overlapping resistance zone formed by the descending trendline and the moving averages has repeatedly absorbed bullish attempts, signalling persistent sell-side pressure at higher levels. At the same time, downside momentum has slowed as the price approaches a clearly defined daily demand zone around the lower boundary of the structure at the $2.7K price range. This area has previously triggered strong reactions, suggesting that buyers remain active and willing to defend these levels. The overall daily structure reflects contraction rather than trend continuation. As the price oscillates between descending resistance and rising demand, the market is compressing into a narrowing range, increasing the probability of a larger directional move once this equilibrium is resolved. ETH/USDT 4-Hour Chart On the 4-hour timeframe, the compression becomes even more evident. The asset is currently looping between the descending resistance line and the ascending support line, forming a clear wedge structure. The most recent price action shows Ethereum bouncing from the lower boundary of the wedge at $2.8K threshold, confirming demand responsiveness and short-term buyer interest at discounted levels. However, despite the bounce, ETH remains capped below the internal resistance zone of $3K and has not yet achieved a clean breakout above the wedge’s upper boundary. This lack of follow-through suggests that bullish momentum is still fragile and largely reactive rather than impulsive. Until ETH can reclaim and hold above the descending resistance with strong acceptance, upside moves are likely to remain corrective. The current structure favors expansion, but direction remains conditional. A decisive breakout above the wedge would shift short-term market control back to buyers, while rejection near resistance could open the door for another rotation toward the demand zone. Sentiment Analysis The liquidation heatmap highlights dense liquidity clusters resting above the current price at the $3.1K region, with particularly heavy concentrations overhead. This suggests that a move into resistance could trigger cascading liquidations on the short side, while downside sweeps into lower liquidity pools may be used to rebalance positioning before any larger directional push. The current distribution of liquidity aligns with the observed price compression, reinforcing the idea that the market is in a positioning phase rather than a trending one. As liquidity continues to build within this range, the eventual breakout is likely to be sharp, with leverage-driven volatility accelerating the move once key levels are breached. Overall, Ethereum appears to be in a late-stage compression phase across price structure and derivatives positioning. Directional clarity will depend on how ETH reacts to the descending resistance and whether liquidity is taken above or below the current range. The post Ethereum Price Prediction: Is ETH Doomed After Another Rejection at $3K? appeared first on CryptoPotato .
29 Jan 2026, 14:00
Internet Computer (ICP) Price Prediction: The Critical Path to $25 by 2030

BitcoinWorld Internet Computer (ICP) Price Prediction: The Critical Path to $25 by 2030 As of March 2025, the Internet Computer (ICP) blockchain continues to evolve beyond its 2021 launch, prompting significant analysis regarding its long-term valuation. This analysis provides a detailed, evidence-based Internet Computer (ICP) price prediction for 2026 through 2030, examining the technological, economic, and market variables that could influence its trajectory toward the $25 threshold. Internet Computer (ICP) Price Prediction: Foundational Analysis for 2026 Forecasting ICP’s price requires a multi-faceted approach. Analysts typically examine historical volatility, current adoption metrics, and broader cryptocurrency market cycles. The Internet Computer protocol, developed by the DFINITY Foundation, aims to extend the public internet’s functionality by hosting backend software. Consequently, its token’s value is intrinsically linked to the network’s utility and developer activity. According to on-chain data from sources like the DFINITY dashboard, the number of smart contracts, or “canisters,” has shown a compound quarterly growth rate. This growth provides a fundamental metric for assessing network use beyond mere speculation. Furthermore, technical analysis of ICP’s price action reveals established support and resistance levels. For instance, the $10 to $12 zone has acted as a critical psychological and technical barrier multiple times throughout 2024. A sustained break above this level with high volume could signal the beginning of a new bullish phase. Market sentiment, often measured through tools like the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, also plays a crucial role. A shift from extreme fear to neutral or greed can catalyze significant capital inflows into altcoins like ICP. Key Drivers for the 2026 Outlook Several concrete factors will shape the ICP price prediction for 2026. First, the continued rollout and integration of major protocol upgrades, such as enhancements to chain-key cryptography and subnet scalability, could improve performance and attract enterprise developers. Second, the expansion of decentralized applications (dApps) built on the network—ranging from social media platforms to enterprise SaaS solutions—directly increases the demand for ICP cycles for computation. Third, the broader macroeconomic environment, including interest rate policies and institutional cryptocurrency adoption, will set the stage for the entire digital asset class. Evaluating the 2027-2028 Horizon: Ecosystem Maturation The period from 2027 to 2028 represents a critical maturation phase for the Internet Computer. By this time, the network’s technological promises will face real-world stress tests at scale. Price predictions for these years hinge less on hype and more on measurable adoption. Analysts will scrutinize metrics like: Total Value Locked (TVL): The amount of assets secured in ICP-based DeFi protocols. Developer Activity: Monthly active developers and code commit frequency on the network. Enterprise Partnerships: Formal collaborations with traditional tech or financial firms to build on ICP. Historical parallels from other layer-1 blockchains suggest that surviving and thriving through a full market cycle often leads to more stable, utility-driven valuation models. If Internet Computer successfully onboards a critical mass of non-fungible token (NFT) projects, gaming ecosystems, or decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), it could decouple partially from Bitcoin’s price movements. This decoupling is a key milestone for any blockchain aspiring to long-term relevance. The Role of Network Burns and Staking ICP’s unique tokenomics involve a “burn” mechanism where cycles for computation are paid for by converting and destroying ICP tokens. This creates a deflationary pressure correlated with network usage. Simultaneously, the Neuron staking system for network governance locks up supply. A simplified model comparing potential usage growth to token supply is presented below. Year Estimated Annual Cycle Burn (ICP) Estimated % of Circulating Supply Staked 2025 1.2M ~40% 2027 3.5M (Projected) ~55% (Projected) 2030 8.0M (Projected) ~65% (Projected) This combination of burning and staking could significantly reduce the liquid, tradable supply of ICP over time, a fundamental factor often incorporated into long-term price models. The 2030 Vision: Is a Move Toward $25 Plausible? The question of ICP reaching $25 by 2030 is not a matter of simple linear projection. Instead, it requires assessing a probability-weighted range of outcomes based on success criteria. A $25 price point implies a market capitalization that would place ICP firmly within the top 15-20 digital assets, assuming moderate overall crypto market growth. For this target to be achievable, several conditions would likely need to be met. The Internet Computer must capture a measurable percentage of the cloud computing market, particularly in sectors valuing censorship resistance. Its developer experience must rival or exceed that of established competitors. Finally, the broader regulatory landscape for decentralized protocols must remain sufficiently open for innovation. Financial models, such as discounted cash flow analyses adapted for crypto networks, attempt to value the future fee generation of the protocol. While highly speculative, these models provide a framework beyond comparative market cap analysis. They force consideration of the total addressable market for decentralized cloud services and ICP’s potential share. Reports from firms like CoinShares or ARK Invest often highlight the disruptive potential of decentralized compute networks, providing external validation for the sector’s growth thesis. Risks and Counterarguments to the Bullish Case A balanced Internet Computer (ICP) price prediction must acknowledge material risks. Technological challenges, such as undiscovered vulnerabilities or scalability hiccups, could delay adoption. Competition from other smart contract platforms (Ethereum, Solana, Cardano) and traditional cloud providers (AWS, Google Cloud) adopting blockchain services is intense. Moreover, the cryptocurrency market remains prone to extreme volatility and “black swan” events that can reset valuations across the board. Therefore, any long-term forecast must include a wide confidence interval, acknowledging that $25 is a possible outcome within a broader range that also includes lower price scenarios. Conclusion This comprehensive Internet Computer (ICP) price prediction from 2026 to 2030 illustrates a path defined by technological execution and ecosystem growth. The move toward $25 is not guaranteed but is plausible within a scenario where the network achieves significant real-world adoption and sustains its technological edge. The key variables to monitor are on-chain activity, developer growth, and the successful implementation of the protocol’s roadmap. Investors and observers should prioritize these fundamental metrics over short-term price fluctuations to accurately gauge the project’s long-term potential. FAQs Q1: What is the most important factor for ICP’s price in 2026? The most critical factor will likely be the demonstrable growth in active, user-facing decentralized applications on the network, which drives demand for ICP tokens through cycle burns. Q2: How does ICP’s tokenomics model differ from Bitcoin or Ethereum? ICP utilizes a dual-model where tokens are burned to pay for network computation (creating deflationary pressure) and are also staked in Neurons for governance, which locks supply. This differs from Bitcoin’s pure store-of-value issuance and Ethereum’s fee-burn mechanism post-EIP-1559. Q3: Can traditional financial analysis be applied to ICP price prediction? While challenging, analysts adapt traditional models like Total Addressable Market (TAM) analysis and network value-to-transaction ratios. The primary focus, however, remains on on-chain metrics and adoption rates unique to blockchain networks. Q4: What are the biggest risks to this price prediction? The primary risks include broader cryptocurrency market downturns, failure to scale the technology as planned, intense competition from other blockchains, and adverse regulatory developments targeting decentralized cloud services. Q5: Where can I find reliable data to track ICP’s progress? Official sources include the DFINITY dashboard and Internet Computer dashboard for network metrics. For market and on-chain data, aggregators like CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, and Messari provide standardized reporting and analysis. This post Internet Computer (ICP) Price Prediction: The Critical Path to $25 by 2030 first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
29 Jan 2026, 13:59
Single Bitcoin entity keeping BTC price 'suppressed' below $90K: Analysis

Bitcoin order-book analysis said that BTC price action was being held back by just one trading entity, while risking a trip to "Bearadise."
29 Jan 2026, 13:57
Robinhood is investing in crypto trading platform Talos at $1.5 billion valuation

The $45 million Series B extension also includes participation from new strategic investors Sony Innovation Fund, IMC, QCP and Karatage.
29 Jan 2026, 13:50
Cere Network execs face $100M lawsuit over fraud, racketeering, and token dumping

A group of investors filed a $100 million lawsuit on Tuesday in a US federal court against executives of the San Francisco blockchain data project Cere Network. The complaint accuses insiders of fraud, racketeering, and orchestrating a token dump after the 2021 launch. According to the plaintiffs, the business prospects, token restrictions, and customer traction of the project were being misled by Cere Network and its CEO, Fred Jin. The founder of Cere was identified as the perpetrator in the lawsuit. However, there were many other defendants as well. Cere Network faked promises and investor roles In the court filing, the plaintiffs claimed the project pitched a vision of a decentralized data storage platform operating within independent servers. Cere presented the system as a solution to the insatiable demand for secure cloud data services, which would also run on a proprietary digital asset, the CERE Token. The complaint says investors were told the token would power payments and governance on the platform. They were also informed that the token would seek listings on exchanges such as Binance , with proceeds from token sales used to fund infrastructure development. One plaintiff, Lujunjin “Vivian” Liu of Cupertino, says she was introduced to Jin and his plans for the data network. Liu was recruited as a senior strategic advisor and told that her compensation would be made in CERE tokens. From 2019 through 2021, Liu says she devoted up to 20 hours per week to the new venture’s fundraising, investor outreach, and token planning ahead of the public sale. She also invested personally and through Goopal Digital Ltd., an affiliated investment firm. Cere raised about $50 million through private and public token sales in November 2021, the complaint states. The project’s investors were told that insider tokens would be subject to lockups to purportedly prevent insiders from selling their holdings and protect CERE’s market stability. But the plaintiffs insist those assurances were false, as insiders began selling large quantities of tokens soon after trading began, causing a steep price slump. CERE made a market debut at $0.45 but fell to around $0.06 after weeks of trading. As of Thursday, it was trading near $0.0003384, down more than 99% from its all-time high. While employees and outside investors were subject to lockups, the complaint says Jin and associates were not bound in practice. They allegedly sold more than $41 million in tokens on public exchanges shortly after launch and transferred the proceeds into personal cryptocurrency wallets. Goopal and Liu also allege that millions of dollars raised for Cere were moved into shell entities and accounts linked to Jin and partners. Moreover, the plaintiffs argue that Jin used automated bots from Gotbit Ltd. to engage in wash trading. The US Department of Justice convicted Gotbit’s founder of wire fraud and market manipulation in June last year, Cryptopolitan reported . Liu and Goopal are seeking $25 million in compensatory damages and $75 million in punitive damages. Cere Network CEO is facing another lawsuit and internal control allegations The federal case comes against the backdrop of another law charge filed two weeks earlier in Delaware. Cerebellum Networks co-founder Ken Wang filed suit in the Court of Chancery against the same defendants, claiming they diverted about $58 million in Cere token assets. Cerebellum was established in January 2019 after raising approximately $42.9 million from private investors and token sales between 2019 and 2021. The funds were intended to build and operate the Cere Network platform. Wang alleges that “secret token dumps” began immediately after the November 8, 2021, ICO. He claims roughly $41.78 million in tokens moved from the company treasury to exchanges. These tokens were sold through accounts controlled by Jin and others, despite their claims that project-allocated tokens were “locked.” The Delaware complaint also indicates that at least $16.6 million was stolen from a Regulation D fundraising wallet. The money, allegedly from Republic’s US investors, was sent to two unknown personal wallets. They were used for crypto trading, resulting in losses of about $9.78 million. Jin is alleged to have gained control of more than 86% of the financial documents as he tricked shareholders and advisors with misleading financial information. This included fake financial reports, understated fundraising amounts, and misrepresentations of multi-signature wallet information. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .
29 Jan 2026, 13:50
JitoSOL ETP Launch: 21Shares’ Revolutionary Staking Product Debuts on Euronext with Unprecedented Dual Rewards

BitcoinWorld JitoSOL ETP Launch: 21Shares’ Revolutionary Staking Product Debuts on Euronext with Unprecedented Dual Rewards In a landmark development for cryptocurrency accessibility, 21Shares has launched the first exchange-traded product tracking JitoSOL on Euronext exchanges in Paris and Amsterdam, fundamentally transforming how traditional investors access Solana’s staking ecosystem through the innovative JSOL ticker. JitoSOL ETP Represents New Era in Crypto Investment Products The newly launched JitoSOL ETP provides investors with unprecedented dual exposure. Consequently, participants gain direct access to Solana’s native token price movements while simultaneously earning staking rewards and transaction revenue generated through the Jito infrastructure network. This innovative structure addresses multiple investor needs simultaneously. The product trades under the ticker JSOL across Euronext’s regulated European exchanges. According to The Block’s reporting, this launch represents a significant expansion of 21Shares’ cryptocurrency ETP offerings. The company has established itself as a leading issuer in this rapidly evolving space. This development follows increasing institutional demand for regulated crypto exposure. Moreover, it bridges decentralized finance mechanisms with traditional financial markets effectively. Technical Architecture and Revenue Mechanisms The JitoSOL ETP operates through a sophisticated technical framework. JitoSOL itself functions as a liquid staking token on the Solana blockchain. This token represents staked SOL while maintaining liquidity for trading and DeFi applications. The Jito network enhances Solana’s proof-of-stake consensus through its MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) infrastructure. This infrastructure captures transaction ordering revenue that would otherwise go to validators. The ETP channels these dual revenue streams to investors: Staking Rewards: Generated from SOL tokens actively participating in network validation Transaction Revenue: Derived from Jito’s MEV infrastructure and network services Price Appreciation: Direct exposure to SOL’s market price movements Euronext Listing Signals Mainstream Crypto Adoption Euronext’s acceptance of the JitoSOL ETP marks a pivotal moment for European cryptocurrency regulation. The Paris and Amsterdam exchanges represent two of Europe’s most significant financial hubs. Their regulatory frameworks provide investor protections typically absent in direct crypto trading. This listing follows extensive due diligence by exchange authorities. Furthermore, it demonstrates growing institutional confidence in blockchain-based financial products. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has gradually clarified its position on crypto assets. Recent regulatory developments have created clearer pathways for such innovative products. Euronext’s decision reflects this evolving regulatory landscape. Additionally, it positions European investors ahead of other global markets in accessing sophisticated crypto instruments. Comparative Analysis with Traditional Staking Products Feature JitoSOL ETP Direct SOL Staking Traditional Crypto ETPs Regulatory Framework Euronext-regulated Blockchain-native Exchange-regulated Revenue Sources Price + Staking + MEV Staking only Price only Liquidity Access Exchange trading hours 24/7 with unlocking period Exchange trading hours Custodial Risk Institutional custody Self-custody required Institutional custody Solana Ecosystem Benefits from Enhanced Institutional Access The JitoSOL ETP launch significantly benefits the broader Solana ecosystem. Increased institutional investment typically enhances network security through greater stake distribution. Moreover, it validates Solana’s technical architecture for enterprise-grade applications. The Jito network specifically addresses historical concerns about MEV extraction on proof-of-stake networks. Its infrastructure democratizes revenue distribution beyond traditional validator operators. This development follows Solana’s remarkable recovery from network outages in recent years. The blockchain has implemented substantial technical improvements to its consensus mechanism. Consequently, institutional confidence in the network has steadily increased. Major financial institutions have begun exploring Solana-based products more aggressively. This ETP represents the most sophisticated offering to date. Market Context and Competitive Landscape 21Shares operates in an increasingly competitive cryptocurrency ETP market. Major competitors include CoinShares, WisdomTree, and Grayscale. Each firm has developed unique approaches to crypto investment products. 21Shares has distinguished itself through innovative product structures. The company previously launched Europe’s first Bitcoin ETP in 2018. Since then, it has expanded its offerings across multiple blockchain assets. The JitoSOL ETP represents its first product incorporating DeFi-native revenue mechanisms. This innovation potentially creates a new category of investment vehicles. Other issuers will likely develop similar products if investor demand materializes. The market for liquid staking tokens has grown exponentially across all major blockchains. Ethereum’s Lido protocol pioneered this concept with stETH. Solana’s ecosystem has developed competitive alternatives like JitoSOL and Marinade Finance. Investor Implications and Risk Considerations Potential investors must understand several critical aspects of the JitoSOL ETP. The product offers exposure to multiple risk factors simultaneously. These include cryptocurrency market volatility, staking slashing risks, and MEV revenue variability. However, the Euronext listing provides regulatory safeguards absent in direct crypto investments. Investors benefit from traditional brokerage access and familiar trading interfaces. Tax treatment may differ significantly from direct crypto holdings depending on jurisdiction. The ETP structure eliminates technical complexities of direct staking participation. Investors avoid managing validator nodes or understanding MEV mechanics. Nevertheless, they should comprehend the fundamental revenue drivers. The product’s performance depends on Solana network adoption, transaction volume, and staking participation rates. These factors introduce unique correlations distinct from pure price exposure products. Historical Performance and Future Projections Liquid staking tokens have demonstrated compelling historical performance characteristics. During 2023-2024, staking rewards provided substantial yield enhancement during market downturns. The MEV component has shown particular resilience during high network activity periods. JitoSOL’s specific architecture has outperformed basic staking derivatives during Solana’s recent network upgrades. Future performance will depend on several macroeconomic and technical factors. Regulatory developments remain crucial for institutional adoption. Solana’s continued technical evolution will impact network reliability and transaction costs. Broader cryptocurrency market cycles inevitably influence all crypto-linked products. However, the dual revenue structure potentially provides downside protection during bear markets. The product’s novelty means limited historical data exists for backtesting. Early adoption may involve higher volatility as market makers establish efficient pricing mechanisms. Conclusion The JitoSOL ETP launch by 21Shares on Euronext represents a transformative development in cryptocurrency investment accessibility. This innovative product successfully bridges decentralized finance mechanisms with traditional regulated exchanges. Investors gain unprecedented exposure to Solana’s price movements, staking rewards, and transaction revenue streams simultaneously. The Euronext listing in Paris and Amsterdam provides crucial regulatory legitimacy for institutional participation. This development signals accelerating mainstream adoption of sophisticated blockchain-based financial instruments. The JitoSOL ETP establishes a new benchmark for cryptocurrency investment products that combine multiple revenue sources within regulated frameworks. FAQs Q1: What exactly is the JitoSOL ETP launched by 21Shares? The JitoSOL ETP is an exchange-traded product that tracks JitoSOL, a Solana-based liquid staking token. It provides investors with exposure to SOL’s price while earning staking rewards and transaction revenue from Jito’s MEV infrastructure, all through regulated Euronext exchanges. Q2: How does the JitoSOL ETP differ from simply buying SOL cryptocurrency? Unlike direct SOL ownership, the ETP provides additional revenue streams from staking and MEV capture while offering regulatory protections through Euronext listing. It eliminates technical complexities of staking and provides traditional brokerage access without self-custody requirements. Q3: On which exchanges is the JitoSOL ETP available for trading? The product trades under ticker JSOL on Euronext exchanges in Paris and Amsterdam. These are regulated European exchanges providing standard market hours and investor protections consistent with traditional securities trading. Q4: What are the primary revenue sources for JitoSOL ETP investors? Investors receive three revenue components: price appreciation of underlying SOL tokens, staking rewards from network validation participation, and transaction revenue generated through Jito’s maximal extractable value (MEV) infrastructure on the Solana network. Q5: How does this product fit within the broader trend of cryptocurrency institutionalization? The JitoSOL ETP represents a significant advancement in crypto institutionalization by combining DeFi-native revenue mechanisms with regulated exchange listing. It demonstrates growing acceptance of sophisticated blockchain economics within traditional financial frameworks and provides institutional investors with previously inaccessible yield opportunities. This post JitoSOL ETP Launch: 21Shares’ Revolutionary Staking Product Debuts on Euronext with Unprecedented Dual Rewards first appeared on BitcoinWorld .












































