hodler

3 Jun 2026, 06:43

Humanity Protocol’s H Token: Why Proof-of-Human AI Coins Are Defying the Selloff

Altcoins bled across the board , yet Humanity Protocol’s H kept printing higher highs. In a week when risk assets chopped , H’s tape showed relentless bids, fat volumes, and a steady stream of headlines. The reason feels counterintuitive: in an AI-saturated market , the scarce asset is not compute — it’s verifiable humans. Tokens tied to proof-of-humanity are suddenly trading like indispensable infrastructure. This is the story behind that resilience, what’s actually under the hood, and how to assess the trade without drinking the Kool‑Aid. The Big Picture: Humans Become the Premium in an AI Market Editor's note: In Q1–Q2 2026 I kept seeing the same pattern on our desks: app teams slashing sybil budgets while user acquisition stayed flat, and yet spend on authenticity tools climbed. During May’s choppy tape, the few names with credible “one‑human” credentials held bids better than beta, and market makers told me two‑sided flow was unusually steady. I’m cautious on straight-line extrapolations, but across multiple calls with founders the message is consistent — they’re prioritizing privacy‑preserving verification to keep incentives honest. If that integration cadence continues, this category could trade more like middleware than meme risk, with all the usual caveats about liquidity and unlocks. — Ethan Caldwell AI tools have lowered the cost of generating content, accounts, and interactions to near zero. For Web3 apps, that makes bots cheaper than users — and sybil attacks cheaper than growth. Proof‑of‑human networks aim to reverse that equation by making “being human” a verifiable, portable credential that apps can price into incentives, governance, and access. In a selloff driven by macro beta, assets tied to a rising structural need — authenticated users — can decorrelate, at least temporarily, when demand for their utility accelerates faster than risk-off flows. Who’s affected? Any protocol paying rewards, running governance, or selling attention. That includes L2s, social platforms, creator marketplaces, airdrop farmers, and even advertisers looking for real eyeballs. What Proof‑of‑Human Tokens Aim to Solve The bot problem is now an economic problem Sybil‑driven growth has hard costs: distorted analytics, mispriced airdrops, spam governance, and inflated DAU that breaks business models. As AI turbocharges the cost curve for fakes, applications need a way to set rate limits, payouts, and voting weight by “human‑ness,” not raw wallet count. Why a token exists in this stack Proof‑of‑human systems commonly use a token for several reasons: Incentives: reward verifiers/validators for attestation work and penalize fraud via slashing or bonds. Access pricing: meter API calls, social actions, or airdrop eligibility with per‑human quotas. Governance: align decision rights with verified participation rather than capital alone. Security budget: pay for audits, bug bounties, and anti‑abuse R&D from a native treasury. Designs vary widely — from attestations anchored on-chain to privacy‑preserving proofs via zero‑knowledge. The through‑line is portable identity assurance without forcing apps to build their own KYC stack. Humanity’s H: Momentum, Liquidity, and Milestones Performance snapshot H’s outperformance hasn’t been subtle. Messari’s project page for Humanity shows H up roughly +164.84% over the past month, underscoring a strong momentum regime even as broader altcoins struggled ( Messari , June 2, 2026). CoinStats’ fundamental analysis highlighted a +168.72% seven‑day spike with 24‑hour trading volume around $357,382,031 — a sign that the move was backed by turnover, not just thin liquidity ( CoinStats , June 1, 2026). CoinMarketCap lists Humanity’s all‑time high at $0.8534 on June 2, 2026, framing the timing of the surge ( CoinMarketCap ). As of June 3, CMC’s live page showed a market cap near $1.87 billion and approximately $555 million in daily volume — significant scale for a category that until recently sat at the edge of DeFi conversations ( CoinMarketCap ). Timeline of episodic strength DateEventNoted ImpactMay 20, 2026Selective altcoin bounceH rose ~19% during the session, per CMC’s update ( CoinMarketCap (CMC AI) )June 1, 2026Weekly momentum+168.72% 7‑day performance; $357M 24h volume ( CoinStats )June 2, 2026Price milestoneATH recorded at $0.8534 ( CoinMarketCap )June 3, 2026Liquidity snapshot~$1.87B market cap; ~$555M 24h volume ( CoinMarketCap ) Liquidity and market structure Liquidity matters in selloffs. H’s turnover — reflected in both CoinStats’ and CMC’s tallies — suggests multiple venues and active market makers rather than a single exchange‑driven pump. That doesn’t immunize the asset from volatility, but it does create more two‑sided flow, which can reduce gap risk during risk‑off days. Under the Hood: Verification, Attestations, Rate Limits Because proof‑of‑human designs differ, think in building blocks rather than a single canonical flow. A typical lifecycle might look like this: User enrollment: A participant generates a pseudonymous identifier and opts into verification via an approved method (e.g., attestations from trusted verifiers or privacy‑preserving checks). Verification event: The system records a proof or attestation that a unique human controls the identifier, usually without revealing private data to relying apps. Credential issuance: The network mints a non‑transferable credential or proof (often revocable) linked to the identifier. Rate‑limited actions: Apps query the credential to meter actions — one vote per human, daily mint quotas, ad impressions per unique user, or airdrop eligibility. Challenge and fraud handling: Disputes trigger re‑verification, slashing of malicious verifiers, or credential revocation. Incentives and fees: Tokens pay verifiers, underwrite disputes, and potentially fund grants for integrations. Privacy trade‑offs Approaches range from social‑graph attestations to hardware‑assisted checks to biometrics, with varying privacy and UX profiles. Projects increasingly emphasize zero‑knowledge proofs so users can show “one human, one account” without revealing who they are. The details matter for regulatory exposure and user trust. Composability with apps The real value emerges when many dApps verify once and accept the same credential. That unlocks shared anti‑sybil logic across governance, rewards, and reputation — and gives the token measurable utility beyond speculation. Why Proof‑of‑Human AI Coins Are Bucking the Selloff Structural demand amid AI uncertainty As bots get better, the cost of not filtering them rises for every app paying users or routing attention. That creates semi‑inelastic demand for human verification — a quality more akin to middleware than a memecoin narrative. When macro beta knocks risk assets down together, investors sometimes rotate toward tokens with clearer near‑term utility. Incentives aligned with integrations Proof‑of‑human tokens benefit from integration flywheels: each new dApp that gates access by “one human” deepens credential value for all others. Markets often front‑run those integrations, assigning a premium to networks that show traction or credible partnership pipelines. While specifics should be verified from official disclosures, the category logic is straightforward: more integrations, more recurring demand for verification and associated token sinks. Liquidity and narrative timing H’s data points — new ATH on June 2 and sustained volumes into June 3 — landed precisely as AI discourse re‑centered on authenticity. The May 20 rally noted by CMC’s updates suggests that episodic risk‑on pockets can compound into month‑long momentum when a narrative has fundamental tailwinds ( CoinMarketCap (CMC AI) ). Demand DriverHow It Supports ResilienceSensitivity to Macro Risk‑OffApp integrations using human‑gated accessRecurring credential checks; potential fee flowsMedium — usage can persist even during drawdownsGovernance weighted by verified usersReduces sybil governance capture, adds stickinessLow to Medium — governance continues through cyclesAirdrops and incentive programsFilters bots, improves ROI of campaignsHigh — marketing budgets shrink in bear phasesAdvertising and social platformsImproves ad spend efficiency with real usersMedium — ad markets are cyclical but persistent A Practical Framework to Evaluate H and Its Peers Signal over noise Avoid chasing green candles. Instead, work through a checklist that surfaces durability over hype. Credential model: Is the proof privacy‑preserving? Is revocation possible? Is there a credible path to portability across chains? Verifier economics: Who can verify? What are the incentives and penalties? Are there decentralization targets and timelines? Integration depth: Count live integrations (not MoUs). Do they cover social, governance, rewards, and ads — or just a demo app? Token function: Map token sinks (fees, staking, bonds) against emissions/unlocks. Are there demand drivers beyond speculation? Concentration: Check on‑chain distribution, market‑maker inventory, and treasury transparency. Are liquidity and governance overly concentrated? Regulatory surface: Does the flow resemble KYC? How is data handled? Could rules force changes in verification methods? UX friction: How many steps does verification take? What’s the drop‑off? Are there alternatives that are “good enough” without a token? What to Watch Next for H and the Category Bullish signals to track Net‑new, high‑DAU integrations adopting “one human” gates for rewards or governance. Evidence of privacy‑first verification at scale, with transparent audits. Clear token utility — fees or staking that correlate with credential usage rather than pure narrative flows. Neutral/base path Momentum consolidates while developers build integrations, and the market digests the early run‑up in H’s market cap and volumes (near $1.87B and ~$555M 24h respectively as of June 3 per CoinMarketCap ). Bearish tells Verification bottlenecks or data‑handling controversies that erode user trust. Emission overhangs, unlocks, or market‑maker withdrawals that drain liquidity into dips. Regulatory actions that reclassify verification as de facto KYC without compliant pathways. Risks & What Could Go Wrong Privacy/security incidents: Any leak or misuse of sensitive data (even metadata) can be existential. Centralization of verifiers: Small verifier sets become chokepoints and governance attack vectors. Token‑economics mismatch: If utility doesn’t scale with credential usage, price can decouple from fundamentals. Regulatory friction: Jurisdictions may view certain verification flows as regulated identity services. Model drift and adversarial AI: Attackers evolve, requiring continuous upgrades and funding for anti‑abuse. Unlocks and distribution cliffs: Large insider or ecosystem unlocks can overwhelm demand during risk‑off periods. Composability breakage: If major dApps adopt competing standards, network effects weaken. Outperformance can reverse quickly if trust, privacy, or liquidity wobbles — three legs that hold up the entire proof‑of‑human thesis. If you want ongoing context across price action, integrations, and regulatory shifts, Crypto Daily tracks the category with a focus on data‑backed analysis and risk framing. You can follow coverage and market updates at Crypto Daily . Frequently Asked Questions What exactly is Humanity’s H token used for? Projects in the proof‑of‑human category commonly use their native token for verifier incentives, governance, and potentially fees tied to credential usage. The precise mechanics vary by protocol and should be confirmed via official documentation before taking risk. Why did H rally while many altcoins sold off? Data shows strong momentum and liquidity — with a June 2 ATH and substantial daily volumes per CoinMarketCap — supported by a narrative that treats verified humans as essential infrastructure in an AI‑heavy internet. That combination can create pockets of decorrelation, though it doesn’t remove downside risk. Is proof‑of‑human the same as KYC? No. Many implementations aim for privacy‑preserving uniqueness proofs (one human, one account) rather than identity disclosure. However, design choices may create regulatory exposure depending on jurisdiction and data handling. How reliable are the performance numbers? As of early June 2026, Messari reported ~+164.84% 30‑day gains, CoinStats noted ~+168.72% for seven days, and CoinMarketCap showed a June 2 ATH and sizable market cap/volume. Always check timestamps and methodology on each platform. What are the main risks to watch with H? Privacy/security incidents, verifier centralization, token unlocks, and regulatory friction are top of mind. Liquidity can vanish in risk‑off regimes, so position sizing and scenario planning matter. How can dApps integrate proof‑of‑human without hurting UX? Best practice is “verify once, use everywhere,” ideally with zero‑knowledge credentials that minimize friction. Rate limits and rewards can then reference the credential without repeated checks. Could other AI or identity tokens outpace H? Yes. This is a competitive space. Execution quality, integrations, and credible privacy guarantees will likely determine long‑term winners more than first‑mover status. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

3 Jun 2026, 06:30

Orbs Rolls out V5 on Ethereum and Arbitrum, Cutting Costs Across 10+ Chains

Layer 3 blockchain infrastructure Orbs has launched its V5 product upgrade on Ethereum and Arbitrum to improve cross-chain verification, lower infrastructure costs, and increase validator participation. Milestone Growth Precedes Upgrade The decentralized Layer 3 blockchain infrastructure focused on advanced on-chain trading, Orbs, has unveiled V5, a product upgrade on Ethereum and Arbitrum designed to improve

3 Jun 2026, 06:27

Here’s why the XRP price just lost a crucial support level today (June 3)

XRP price made a strong bearish breakout today, June 3, continuing a downtrend that started on May 14 when it peaked at $1.5486. It dropped below a crucial support level and reached its lowest point since February this year. It has now plunged by over 66% from its highest point last year. XRP price has crashed despite the ongoing ETF inflows The ongoing XRP price crash is happening despite the ongoing demand for Ripple ETFs and the improving ecosystem. While these ETFs did not add any assets on Tuesday, they have been in a positive trajectory. Spot XRP ETFs added over $131 million in assets in May, the best performance this year. This was a big increase compared to the $81 million they added a day earlier. In total, spot Bitcoin ETFs have had cumulative inflows of $1.43 billion, led by those by companies like Bitwise, Canary, and Franklin Templeton. In contrast, spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have shed billions of dollars in assets this year. Bitcoin ETFs lost over $2.4 billion in assets in May, while Ethereum shed $540 million. Notably, the ongoing XRP price crash is happening as its fundamentals remain robust. For example, Ripple Labs has acquired several important licenses this year, including from the UK, Australia, and the European Union. Ripple also achieved a valuation of $50 billion earlier this year. That was $10 billion higher than what the company was valued at when Citadel invested in it late last year. The Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin has also continued doing well, with its assets under management (AUM) soaring to over $1.8 billion. Recent data shows that the coin’s volume jumped to over $22 billion in the last 30 days. That is a sign that its utility is growing this year, a trend that will continue after the signing of the CLARITY Act . Why Ripple is falling this year The main reason why the XRP price is falling despite the improving ecosystem is that demand for cryptocurrencies has fallen. Indeed, the market capitalization of all coins has dropped from over $4 trillion last year to $2.3 trillion today. Bitcoin and most altcoins have all plunged by double digits. The XRP price is also falling this year because of the ongoing rotation towards companies and assets with an AI angle. For example, a closer look at the top gainers in the S&P 500 Index shows that they are all in the AI industry. This includes companies like Sandisk, Micron, Intel, and Western Digital. As a result, investors have pumped billions of dollars into these assets this year. Total ETF inflows in May stood at over $200 billion, with Vanguard’s VOO nearing the $1 trillion valuation. In addition to AI companies, investors are also moving to space companies ahead of the SpaceX IPO . For example, top space ETFs like UFO and NASA have added billions of dollars in value this year. Ripple price technical analysis XRP price chart | Source: TradingView The daily chart shows that the XRP price has remained inside a narrow range this year. It has stayed inside the key support and resistance levels at $1.2740 and $1.5486 since February last year. XRP made a strong bearish breakdown below the channel’s lower side. It has also remained below all moving averages, while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has remained below the oversold level. Therefore, the most likely scenario is where the coin continues falling, potentially below $1 this year. The post Here’s why the XRP price just lost a crucial support level today (June 3) appeared first on Invezz

3 Jun 2026, 06:23

Here’s why the crypto market is crashing and liquidations are rising

The crypto market is crashing today, with Bitcoin and most altcoins remaining in a bear market. After rising to $82,000 in May, Bitcoin price crashed to $66,000 on Wednesday. Ethereum remains below $2,000, while the market capitalization of all tokens fell by 4.2% to $2.3 trillion. This article explores the top reasons behind the crypto crash and the surge in liquidations. Crypto market crashing amid the ongoing AI boom The main reason why the crypto market is going down is that investors have turned to the stock market amid the ongoing artificial intelligence boom in the United States. Some crypto investors have seen the performance of the stock market and decided to move there. Besides, while Bitcoin is down for the year, top AI stocks like Sandisk, Micron, Intel, and Seagate have jumped by triple digits. Similarly, the Nasdaq 100 Index has already jumped by 20% this year, while the S&P 500 Index is up by 10%. Other top AI-focused ETFs are doing well, with the newly launched DRAM more than doubling. A good example of all this is the performance of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Data shows that stocks ETFs have added billions of dollars this year, with Vanguard’s VOO nearing the $1 trillion AUM mark. DRAM, which was launched in April, has gained over $15 billion assets. In contrast, the biggest crypto ETFs have shed substantial assets this year. Bitcoin ETFs have shed over $3 billion in assets since the second week of May this year. Ethereum funds have had outflows in all months other than April this year, losing over $1 billion in assets. To be clear: while the crypto market crash has deepened this year, AI coins have soared. The most notable ones are coins like Humanity Protocol, Worldcoin, Venice Token, and Near Protocol. Technicals have contributed to the crypto crash The first point is the most important one in terms of the ongoing crypto market weakness this year. The other main reason is technicals, which have had a role to play. For example, the daily chart below shows that the Bitcoin price formed a rising wedge pattern. This pattern is made up of two ascending and converging trendlines. A bearish breakout normally happens when the two lines are nearing their convergence. Bitcoin price chart | Source: TradingView Ethereum also formed a similar pattern earlier this year, which also explains why it has retreated sharply. In most cases, Ethereum and Bitcoin are usually the most important drivers of activity in the crypto industry. Most altcoins normally drop when Bitcoin is in a steep freefall. Michael Saylor’s Strategy sold Bitcoin The other main reason behind the current phase of the crypto market crash is that Strategy, the biggest treasury company in the world, sold Bitcoin last week. After years of accumulation, the company dumped Bitcoin worth about $2.5 million last week. It is unclear why the company did that though the management has telegraphed it for months. At the same time, crypto treasury companies have largely stopped buying. Only a handful of them have bought Bitcoin and other coins this year. As the prices continues to underperform, chances are that some of these companies will start selling. The other key reason behind the crypto market crash is that the impact of the October 10 liquidation event remains. Over 1.6 million traders were liquidated positions worth over $20 billion on that day, The post Here’s why the crypto market is crashing and liquidations are rising appeared first on Invezz

3 Jun 2026, 06:15

AUD/USD Holds Near 0.7170 After Softer Australian GDP Data

BitcoinWorld AUD/USD Holds Near 0.7170 After Softer Australian GDP Data The Australian dollar extended its decline against the US dollar on Wednesday, hovering near the 0.7170 level and the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement, after the release of weaker-than-expected Australian gross domestic product (GDP) data. The currency pair remains under pressure as markets reassess the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) policy trajectory amid slowing economic growth. Australian GDP Miss Adds to Selling Pressure Australia’s economy grew at a softer pace in the fourth quarter, with GDP rising 0.6% quarter-on-quarter, below the 0.8% forecast. The annual rate also missed expectations, coming in at 2.1% versus the 2.4% consensus. The data reinforces the view that the RBA may need to hold interest rates steady for longer, reducing the yield advantage that had previously supported the Aussie. Following the release, the AUD/USD pair broke below the 0.7200 psychological barrier and tested support at 0.7170, a level that coincides with the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the October-to-February rally. A sustained break below this zone could open the door for further downside toward the 0.7100 handle. Technical Outlook: Key Levels to Watch From a technical perspective, the pair is trading below both the 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages (SMAs), confirming a bearish bias in the near term. The 23.6% Fibonacci level at 0.7170 is acting as immediate support, with the next major support cluster near 0.7140–0.7120, where the 100-day SMA converges with the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement. On the upside, resistance is seen at 0.7220 (previous support turned resistance) and the 0.7260 region, where the 50-day SMA sits. A recovery above 0.7260 would be needed to shift the short-term outlook back to neutral. Market Implications for Traders The softer GDP print reinforces the narrative that Australia’s economy is losing momentum, which may cap any aggressive RBA tightening. For AUD/USD traders, this means the pair is likely to remain sensitive to US dollar dynamics and global risk sentiment. Any further deterioration in risk appetite—driven by geopolitical tensions or weaker commodity prices—could accelerate the decline. The 23.6% Fibonacci level is a widely watched technical marker. A close below it on a daily basis would signal that the corrective bounce from the October lows has exhausted, potentially opening a deeper retracement toward the 0.7000 psychological level. Conclusion The AUD/USD pair is under pressure following disappointing Australian GDP data, trading near the 0.7170 support zone. The combination of a weaker domestic growth outlook and a broadly steady US dollar keeps the pair vulnerable. Traders should monitor the 0.7170–0.7140 support band closely; a break below could trigger further selling, while a bounce above 0.7220 would suggest temporary stabilization. FAQs Q1: Why did the AUD/USD fall after the GDP release? The GDP data came in below expectations, signaling slower economic growth. This reduces the likelihood of aggressive RBA rate hikes, which diminishes the Aussie’s yield appeal and pressures the currency lower. Q2: What is the significance of the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement level? The 23.6% Fibonacci level is a common technical retracement used by traders to identify potential support or resistance. In this case, it aligns with the 0.7170 area, making it a key level to watch for a potential bounce or breakdown. Q3: What are the next key support and resistance levels for AUD/USD? Immediate support is at 0.7170 (23.6% Fibo), followed by 0.7140–0.7120 (100-day SMA and 38.2% Fibo). On the upside, resistance is at 0.7220 and 0.7260 (50-day SMA). This post AUD/USD Holds Near 0.7170 After Softer Australian GDP Data first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

3 Jun 2026, 06:05

BitForex Founder Moved $1.35 Billion in ETH to Binance Just Before Price Plunge

BitcoinWorld BitForex Founder Moved $1.35 Billion in ETH to Binance Just Before Price Plunge Garrett Jin, the founder of the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange BitForex, deposited a massive 577,717 Ether (ETH) — valued at approximately $1.35 billion — to Binance between May 6 and May 10, according to blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain. The deposit occurred while ETH was trading at a short-term peak of $2,337. Since then, the price of Ethereum has dropped roughly 20%, raising questions about the timing and intent behind the transfer. On-Chain Evidence Points to Coordinated Sell Pressure Lookonchain’s report, based on publicly verifiable on-chain data, shows that the funds were moved in multiple transactions over a five-day window. The deposits coincided with a local price top for Ethereum, which has since declined to around $1,870 at the time of writing. The transfer represents one of the largest single-entity movements of ETH to a centralized exchange in recent months, and it has drawn scrutiny from the crypto community and regulators alike. BitForex collapsed in early 2023 after allegations of fraud, mismanagement, and the disappearance of user funds. The exchange, once ranked among the top 20 by trading volume, abruptly halted withdrawals, leaving thousands of users unable to access their assets. Garrett Jin has been at the center of investigations by multiple authorities, including the FBI and South Korean financial regulators. Implications for Market Stability and Investor Trust The timing of the deposit — just before a significant market correction — has led to speculation that Jin may have been attempting to liquidate a portion of his holdings at a favorable price. While the transfer itself does not prove market manipulation, it adds to the narrative of insiders capitalizing on market conditions at the expense of retail investors. This event also highlights the ongoing challenge of tracking and recovering funds from collapsed crypto platforms. Despite the transparency of blockchain ledgers, the movement of stolen or misappropriated assets remains a persistent issue, often complicating efforts by law enforcement to freeze or recover funds. What This Means for the Broader Crypto Market The deposit underscores the vulnerability of the crypto ecosystem to large, unannounced transfers by individuals with a history of fraudulent activity. For Ethereum, the influx of such a large amount to a major exchange like Binance could signal potential sell pressure, although it remains unclear whether Jin has sold any of the deposited ETH. Binance has not publicly commented on the transaction. For investors, the incident serves as a reminder of the risks associated with centralized exchanges that lack transparent governance and regulatory oversight. It also reinforces the importance of on-chain monitoring tools in identifying suspicious activity before it impacts the broader market. Conclusion The transfer of $1.35 billion in ETH by BitForex founder Garrett Jin to Binance at a market peak, followed by a 20% price decline, raises serious questions about market integrity and the aftermath of exchange failures. While the full implications are still unfolding, the event is a stark illustration of how the ghosts of collapsed crypto platforms continue to influence the market. Regulators and investors alike will be watching closely for any further movements from Jin’s wallets. FAQs Q1: Who is Garrett Jin? Garrett Jin is the founder of BitForex, a cryptocurrency exchange that collapsed in 2023 amid allegations of fraud and mismanagement. He is currently under investigation by multiple law enforcement agencies. Q2: Why is the transfer of ETH to Binance significant? The transfer of 577,717 ETH, worth $1.35 billion at the time, is one of the largest single-entity deposits to a centralized exchange this year. Its timing at a short-term price peak, followed by a 20% drop, has raised suspicions of coordinated selling or market timing. Q3: Can the deposited ETH be frozen or recovered? While Binance has the technical ability to freeze assets, it is unclear whether any legal requests have been made. The recovery of funds from collapsed exchanges like BitForex remains a complex legal process, often requiring cooperation between international authorities and the exchange. This post BitForex Founder Moved $1.35 Billion in ETH to Binance Just Before Price Plunge first appeared on BitcoinWorld .