News
12 May 2026, 19:49
Aptos Pushes Encrypted Mempool Upgrade to Protect Users From Frontrunning and Censorship

Aptos has introduced a proposal for a native Encrypted Mempool system that would allow users to submit transactions privately while still maintaining the speed and transparency of the network. If approved through governance, Aptos said the feature would make it the first Layer 1 blockchain to offer built-in encrypted transaction submission directly at the protocol level. Aptos Targets MEV Exploitation The system is designed to protect users from frontrunning, censorship, and orderflow manipulation. Users would be able to send encrypted transactions with a single click, while all transaction data would still become visible on-chain after block confirmation. Aptos said the proposal comes as decentralized exchange activity continues to grow rapidly. It added that DEX spot trading volumes regularly surpassed $200 billion per month in 2025 and averaged roughly $476 billion monthly during the third quarter. While decentralized exchanges removed reliance on centralized custody and settlement systems, Aptos noted that most blockchains still expose pending transactions before they are finalized, which allows validators and other network participants to observe and potentially exploit trading activity before execution. According to Aptos, this visibility has contributed to the rise of the MEV market, where validators and traders profit by reordering or exploiting pending transactions. The proposed Encrypted Mempool aims to eliminate that exposure by ensuring transaction intent remains confidential until execution while preserving the network’s same security assumptions. Aptos Labs explained that the system relies on threshold cryptography and a distributed key generation process that occurs before each validator epoch. Transactions are submitted as encrypted payloads, and validators collectively decrypt them only after a block has been ordered. The company added that traditional encrypted transaction systems face major scalability issues because validators must individually communicate and process partial decryptions for every encrypted transaction. This ends up creating heavy communication, computation, and latency costs across the network. To solve this problem, its research team developed a batched threshold decryption scheme that allows validators to generate a single partial decryption for an entire batch of encrypted transactions instead of handling them individually. Aptos said this significantly reduces communication and computation overhead while allowing most processing work to happen in advance. The company further revealed that the system prevents replay attacks, removes the need for users to compete for encryption slots, and avoids transaction resubmissions. Aptos said the encrypted mempool integrates directly into the network’s consensus protocol and introduces minimal additional latency. APT Price Action Its native token, APT, has climbed steadily over the past 30 days, rising from around $0.82 in mid-April to nearly $1.10 by mid-May. APT saw several sharp upward moves during the month, briefly crossing $1.20 before pulling back slightly. Over the past 24 hours, however, it declined by almost 2% to trade near $1.10. The post Aptos Pushes Encrypted Mempool Upgrade to Protect Users From Frontrunning and Censorship appeared first on CryptoPotato .
12 May 2026, 19:45
Wintermute says Bitcoin’s push past $80,000 is a short squeeze, not a healthy rally amid stagnant US Iran negotiations

Bitcoin has crossed $80,000. For the first time since January. However, Wintermute, the algorithmic trading firm, believes this to be only a “short squeeze” and has warned that the move is driven by liquidations in the derivatives market, not genuine spot buying by traders. This market report would mean the current price levels are very fragile and particularly unhealthy, as the rally is not considered a purely organic one. Demand healthy, derivatives not In a market report published on Monday, Wintermute said interest in Bitcoin futures grew by about $10 billion over the past month, climbing from $48 billion to $58 billion. Spot trading volume has, however, dropped to a t wo-year low , according to Binance News, citing data from NS3.AI. This means that as Bitcoin approached $70,000, traders bought more shorts, betting the rally would stall and ultimately reverse. Unfortunately for them, the price broke higher, and these shorts ended up being liquidated, triggering a buying rush that pushed BTC above $80,000 and past its 200-day moving average to around $83,000. As the rate of funding of perpetual futures still remains short of normal, there could still be another wave of forced liquidations, Wintermute has stated. This has led the firm to draw a clear line between the covering of liquidated shorts and actual conviction from buyers willing to hold spot Bitcoin. “Without spot-driven demand, the rally is fragile and susceptible to a sharp reversal,” the firm said . Wintermute optimistic long-term Wintermute was more positive with the long-term outlook of BTC. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have attracted combined inflows of $623 million recently, with Morgan Stanley’s Bitcoin ETF alone pulling in $194 million in its first month without a single day of net outflows. The amount of Bitcoin held on crypto exchanges has also fallen to a seven-year low, a positive signal that longer-term holders are accumulating instead of looking to sell. These factors are seen as optimistic and support the case for higher prices over the longer period of time, but they are not nearly enough to offset the short-term risk due to the current price increase being built on derivative trading changes. What could go wrong The firm has identified two important variables that could increase the pressure on BTC in the short term. Firstly, a negative U.S. Consumer Price Index reading could revive inflation concerns and lead to a downturn in crypto prices. The April CPI report, released later in the day, showed a 3.8% year-over-year increase , which was slightly above market forecasts, according to MEXC. Secondly, the nomination process for Kevin Warsh as chairman of the Federal Reserve could add uncertainty around monetary policy and lead to market instability. Wintermute has said a move to $85,000 is still possible, but the risk-to-reward of buying at current levels remains unattractive. Also, Bitcoin’s relative strength index is fast approaching overbought levels. If demand for BTC in spot-trading markets does not materialize once the initial short squeeze is over, Bitcoin prices could see some more red in the coming days. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
12 May 2026, 19:38
Ethereum Developers Propose Fix to 'Blind Signing' Risk Tied to Massive Losses

Ethereum developers proposed a solution that would end "blind signing," a technical feature that has led to potentially billions in losses.
12 May 2026, 19:35
US Dollar Index Surges as Hot CPI Data Strengthens Hawkish Fed Bets

BitcoinWorld US Dollar Index Surges as Hot CPI Data Strengthens Hawkish Fed Bets The US Dollar Index (DXY) rallied sharply on Wednesday, posting its largest single-day gain in weeks, after the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report came in hotter than market expectations. The data reinforced the view that the Federal Reserve will maintain a restrictive monetary policy stance for longer than previously anticipated, driving demand for the greenback across major currency pairs. CPI Data Exceeds Forecasts, Stoking Inflation Concerns The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that headline CPI rose 0.4% month-over-month in January, above the consensus estimate of 0.3%. On an annual basis, inflation stood at 3.1%, down from December’s 3.4% but still above the Fed’s 2% target. Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, increased 0.4% month-over-month, matching the prior month’s pace and surprising analysts who had expected a slight deceleration. The stickiness of core inflation, particularly in services and shelter costs, suggests that the disinflation process is stalling. Market participants quickly repriced the likelihood of rate cuts in 2024, with the probability of a cut at the May FOMC meeting dropping from 60% to below 40% immediately after the release. Market Reaction: Dollar Strength Across the Board The DXY, which measures the dollar against a basket of six major currencies, jumped from 103.80 to 104.65 within hours of the data release. The euro fell below the $1.08 threshold against the dollar, while the Japanese yen weakened past the 149 level, approaching intervention territory for Japanese authorities. The British pound also declined, with GBP/USD slipping below $1.2650. Treasury yields surged in tandem, with the 2-year note yield climbing 12 basis points to 4.65% and the 10-year yield rising to 4.30%. Higher yields further supported the dollar by widening interest rate differentials in favor of US assets. Implications for the Federal Reserve’s Next Moves The January CPI report complicates the Fed’s path toward normalization. While Chair Jerome Powell has repeatedly stated that the central bank needs greater confidence that inflation is sustainably moving toward 2% before cutting rates, the latest data suggests that confidence may take longer to build. Some Fed officials have already pushed back against early rate cut expectations, and this report gives them additional ammunition to maintain a hawkish tone. Investors now expect the first rate cut to occur no earlier than June, with some analysts pushing the timeline to the second half of 2024. The market is currently pricing in approximately 75 basis points of cuts for the year, down from over 150 basis points at the start of January. Broader Economic Context and What to Watch Next The dollar’s rally comes amid a broader reassessment of global monetary policy. Central banks in Europe and Asia are also grappling with persistent inflation, but the US economy’s relative resilience has given the Fed less urgency to ease. Upcoming data releases, including the Producer Price Index (PPI) and retail sales figures, will be closely watched for further confirmation of inflationary pressures. Geopolitical factors, including ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and supply chain disruptions in the Red Sea, could add further upward pressure on commodity prices, complicating the inflation outlook. For currency traders, the key question is whether the dollar’s strength is sustainable or if it will fade as markets adjust to the new data. Conclusion The hot January CPI print has reset market expectations for Fed policy, pushing the dollar index to multi-week highs. The data underscores the challenge facing the Federal Reserve as it attempts to balance inflation control with economic growth. For now, the dollar appears well-supported by higher yields and a more hawkish policy outlook, but the sustainability of this move will depend on upcoming economic data and the Fed’s communication at the next FOMC meeting in March. FAQs Q1: What is the US Dollar Index (DXY)? The US Dollar Index (DXY) measures the value of the US dollar relative to a basket of six major foreign currencies: the euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona, and Swiss franc. It is a widely used benchmark for dollar strength in global forex markets. Q2: Why did the dollar rally after the CPI data? The dollar rallied because the CPI data came in hotter than expected, suggesting inflation is proving more persistent than anticipated. This reduces the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates soon, making dollar-denominated assets more attractive to investors seeking higher yields. Q3: How does a stronger dollar affect global markets? A stronger dollar can weigh on emerging market currencies, increase debt servicing costs for countries with dollar-denominated debt, and make US exports more expensive. It can also put downward pressure on commodity prices, which are typically priced in dollars, and impact multinational corporate earnings. This post US Dollar Index Surges as Hot CPI Data Strengthens Hawkish Fed Bets first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
12 May 2026, 19:30
Gold Prices Tumble as Hot CPI and Surging Oil Crush Fed Rate-Cut Hopes

BitcoinWorld Gold Prices Tumble as Hot CPI and Surging Oil Crush Fed Rate-Cut Hopes Gold prices fell sharply on Wednesday, breaking below key support levels after a hotter-than-expected U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) report and a continued surge in oil prices effectively extinguished market expectations for near-term Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The precious metal, often seen as a hedge against inflation, instead sold off as traders repriced the likelihood of tighter monetary policy persisting through the first half of 2025. CPI and Oil Data Trigger Repricing The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that headline CPI rose 0.4% month-over-month in January, exceeding the consensus estimate of 0.3%. On an annual basis, inflation came in at 3.1%, above the 2.9% forecast. Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also surprised to the upside, climbing 0.4% for the month and 3.9% year-over-year. Simultaneously, crude oil prices extended their rally, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude breaching $82 per barrel for the first time since October 2024. The dual pressure from persistent inflation and rising energy costs has forced a dramatic reassessment of the Fed’s policy path. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, the probability of a rate cut at the March meeting fell from 42% to just 12% following the data releases. Why Gold Sold Off on Inflation News Conventional wisdom suggests that gold should benefit from inflation, as it is often viewed as a store of value. However, the immediate market reaction was a sharp selloff, with spot gold dropping over 2.5% to trade near $2,010 per ounce. The mechanism at play is the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. When the Fed is forced to keep rates higher for longer, the dollar strengthens, and real yields on Treasuries rise, making gold less attractive compared to interest-bearing instruments. The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) jumped 0.7% on the session, adding further downward pressure on dollar-denominated gold. Analysts noted that the move was largely a liquidity-driven liquidation as leveraged funds reduced long positions in response to the hawkish repricing. Market Implications for Investors For investors holding gold or gold-related exchange-traded funds (ETFs), the message is clear: the macroeconomic environment has shifted. The combination of sticky services inflation, a resilient labor market, and rising energy costs suggests that the Fed’s “higher for longer” stance will remain intact for at least the next two quarters. This removes a key bullish catalyst for gold, which had been rallying since late 2024 on expectations of a pivot. Gold miners’ stocks also suffered, with the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (GDM) falling 3.8%. The selloff was broad-based, affecting both senior producers and junior explorers. Conclusion Wednesday’s CPI and oil price data have fundamentally altered the near-term outlook for monetary policy, delivering a sharp blow to gold bulls. While the long-term case for gold as a portfolio diversifier remains intact, the immediate path of least resistance appears lower. Traders will now focus on Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s upcoming testimony and the next round of producer price data for further clues on the inflation trajectory. FAQs Q1: Why did gold prices fall if inflation is rising? Gold prices fell because higher inflation forces the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates elevated. This strengthens the U.S. dollar and increases real bond yields, making gold less competitive as a non-yielding asset. The immediate market reaction is often a selloff in gold when rate-cut expectations are dashed. Q2: How does surging oil affect gold prices? Higher oil prices contribute to overall inflation, particularly in transportation and manufacturing costs. This adds to the pressure on central banks to maintain tight monetary policy. Additionally, rising energy costs can slow economic growth, but in the current environment, the inflation-fighting response from the Fed has been the dominant factor driving gold lower. Q3: Should I sell my gold holdings now? This article does not provide financial advice. However, investors should be aware that the near-term outlook for gold has weakened due to the repricing of Fed rate cuts. Many analysts suggest that gold may trade in a range between $1,950 and $2,050 until clearer signals emerge on inflation and monetary policy. Portfolio decisions should be based on individual risk tolerance and investment horizon. This post Gold Prices Tumble as Hot CPI and Surging Oil Crush Fed Rate-Cut Hopes first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
12 May 2026, 19:28
CRCG: Don't Be Fooled By The Pullbacks. CRCL's Business Works And So Does CRCG

Summary Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF (CRCG) is best used as a tactical, intraday trading instrument due to volatility drag. CRCG's structure relies on swaps and options for synthetic exposure, with no direct CRCL share ownership and collateral requirements up to 100%. Circle (CRCL) shows strong fundamentals: $694 million revenue (+20% YoY), $151 million adjusted EBITDA (+24% YoY), and 63% USDC market share. I rate CRCG as HOLD; (IMO) extreme volatility limits holding periods, but positive momentum and partnerships could enhance tactical appeal if volatility subsides. The Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF (CRCG) fund was launched approximately 2 months after Circle Internet Group, Inc.'s (CRCL) IPO and captured the POST-HYPE phase of Circle's IPO; a perfect moment to remind everyone of a lesson: 2x leverage instruments with daily replication can destroy capital if held beyond the day. And although even today on CRCG you can still taste the weight of CRCL's collapse, this doesn't mean that CRCG is an instrument to avoid, nor that CRCL is a terrible investment in my opinion. On the contrary, if used with discretion in my view, CRCG can become a tactical portfolio instrument, while CRCL an interesting asset to monitor. But before introducing my thesis... What is CRCG? It's an actively managed ETF with 2x leverage factor on a daily basis on the daily performance of Circle Internet Group's common stock. The objective is valid ONLY for holding periods of 1 trading day; for longer periods, the return mathematically diverges from 2x of the underlying due to the compounding effect. If held for longer periods, this would experience volatility drag and take on significant risk, as explained here . CRCG: 1Y performance (Seeking Alpha) The fund's TER is 0.78% but the real cost would derive from the classic volatility drag effect: Daily rebalancing creates a systematic "buy high, sell low" pattern. If CRCL moves significantly intraday, the fund's exposure moves away from the 2x target until end-of-day rebalancing and the comparison with CRCL's performance confirms it (CRCG's returns are 3x lower compared to those of CRCL). CRCG - CRCL: Cruise Sector Relative Performance (Seeking Alpha) How Is It Constructed? It uses Swap agreements with major financial institutions for periods from 1 day to >1 year with Deep in-the-money call options on the underlying, Synthetic forwards (buy at-the-money call + sell at-the-money put simultaneously) and FLEX Options (FLexible EXchange Options) with customizable terms (strike, expiration, type) with collateral originally 25-50% of assets, BUT the March 13, 2026 supplement updated to "up to 100% of its assets as collateral for swap agreements or as premiums for purchased options contracts". Therefore the fund does NOT hold CRCL shares directly; at this moment there are 5 holdings representing this position. CRCG: Synthetic Exposure Portfolio Structure (Author) How Are the Peers Constructed? It's not the only 2x leverage product on Circle, there's also CCUP and CRCA. Two solutions that in my opinion at the structure level are not better than CRCG. This for a TER question: in all 3 cases there's a 2X daily replication, so actually if you respected the idea of a maximum daily holding period, the impact in relative terms of the TER is really minimal. But, still in theory, it would simplify if the holding period increased. This considering that in terms of AUM there are no major differences except for CCUP which has much less assets under management, as this table shows. CRCG: ETF Comparison (Seeking Alpha) But What to Expect From Circle? Circle is technically a fintech that issues stablecoins, VettaFi research defines it as "tech-adjacent" together with Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). Circle is the issuer of USDC, a regulated stablecoin with $30B+ in circulation. That of stablecoins is perhaps the only segment of the crypto industry that I can stand. Companies like Cicle internet group have a business model that at least I can understand and that I consider sustainable. And yesterday's earning call confirms it, because today Circle has Total revenue of $694 million (+20% YoY), Adjusted EBITDA of $151 million (+24% YoY, 53% margin), and a USDC market share equal to 63% of all stablecoin transactions. CRCG: Arc Token Plans (Seeking Alpha) Result of a Transaction volume +263% is an absurd number (almost 3x YoY), with a Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) partnership (creator payouts in USDC) ongoing, signal of the long-awaited mainstream adoption. Real numbers, behind a new business, but concrete and profitable. Technical Evidence The company clearly has a beta linked to that of BTC-USD and the Nasdaq-100 (perhaps more Russell 2000). CRGC: 6M performance (Seeking Alpha) The IPO contraction came together with the fall of BTC-USD from the August 2025 highs of Bitcoin. Following this narrative rhetoric, it's also true that from the February lows of BTC-USD, CRCL shares have indeed recovered ground, in turn more than BTC-USD, somewhat confirming the high beta nature of this financial entity. Almost in view precisely of a repricing in front of guidance expectations. This resulted in a recovery of CRCG from the lows it had reached (amplified), although the performance above the day is naturally not 2x that of CRCL, for the reasons related to the volatility drag we talked about. A pattern also muddied by the typical IPO sequence: 1-3 weeks of pump, followed by distribution that lasts about 5-12 weeks, and then 3-6 months of post pump collapse, where valuations are returning to average. The past was therefore statistically one of the worst moments to participate in 2x leverage solutions. This because from launch risk/reward is negatively skewed; an example of these situations you can find here. In Perspective I think that net of the pullback, the underlying direction is positive for these circuits, with major new partnership (e.g. integration with Apple Pay, Google Pay, Amazon), US stablecoin bill passes with terms favorable to Circle (positive regulatory clarity) considering Trump's Genius Act and in perspective it wouldn't be impossible to expect that USDC circulation passes from $30-$50 billion+ in quarter (massive adoption spike). Element that considering the earning call data, is not so excludable in my opinion. And if this helped to compress volatility below 20% annualized, it would leave room on 2x instruments even for longer-term participations. All the more so if BTC's price should return to maintain bullish tones, element that personally I expect, and I talked about it extensively here . CRCL - BTC Momentum (Seeking Alpha) Risk The worst scenario is that of high volatility sideways market (oscillations around flat level) that precisely generates again, as it has generated from launch a compounding drag (simplified). Also because ultimately Stablecoin regulation is in extreme flux globally: US: No comprehensive stablecoin legislation passed yet and EU with MiCA regulation entered into force 2024, requires licensing for stablecoin issuers. So struggle between two poles, the first very positive because the financial structures of stablecoins that work can be very lucrative, the second regulatory action can have massive downside but limited upside. CRCG: Risk Grade (Seeking Alpha) My Opinion The risks are concrete, but judging from the underlying direction, it seems to proceed more toward positive scenarios, than extremely pessimistic ones like excessive regulation of the sector. In this sense, also considering renewed and positive prospects for these business models and specifically Circle, CRCG would become a tactical solution, especially if BTC-USD's price returned to rise. Yet, volatility today is still too high in my opinion to justify a holding period beyond daily, or at most weekly. But for intraday replication, I think CRCG remains an excellent tactical vehicle. Conclusion I think therefore that the right rating is HOLD. The fund naturally suffers the volatility drag effect, but like every other 2x fund. The intraday replication is linear, and ultimately the fund proposes precisely that. If to this we add the prospects on Cicle, and the momentum cycle it has entered, it becomes a tactical portfolio solution interesting for now due to extreme volatility in my opinion valid not beyond the trading day.
















































