News
26 Jan 2026, 17:57
MEXC and Ether.fi’s Crypto Card ‘Puts Power in the Hands of Users’

The new card can be used at more than 150 million Visa merchants globally, and offers 4% cashback and exclusive perks.
26 Jan 2026, 17:56
Metaplanet Stock Prediction: Down 8% Today After $720M Bitcoin Loss

Metaplanet Inc. shares fell after the company revised its full-year forecast for fiscal 2025, reported a massive $720 million Bitcoin impairment charge, and issued a fiscal 2026 outlook heavily dependent on BTC-linked income. The Tokyo-listed firm announced it booked a Bitcoin impairment loss of $720 million (¥104.6 billion) following a BTC price decline. It also reported a $155 million (¥22.6 billion) foreign-exchange translation gain from yen depreciation in other comprehensive income. After netting these effects, Metaplanet said the value of its Bitcoin net assets dropped by about $565 million (¥82 billion) for the period. The company held 35,102 Bitcoin as of Dec. 31, 2025. Metaplanet declined to provide guidance for ordinary income or net income attributable to shareholders, citing Bitcoin price volatility as too unpredictable. Fiscal 2026 Forecast Bets Big On BTC Income Metaplanet projected fiscal 2026 revenue of $110 million (¥16.0 billion), more than double its fiscal 2025 revenue forecast of $61 million (¥8.9 billion). It forecast operating income of $78 million (¥11.4 billion), assuming selling, general, and administrative expenses of about $32 million (¥4.6 billion). The company expects $107 million (¥15.6 billion) of its $110 million revenue forecast to come from Bitcoin Income Generation operations. It said expanded Bitcoin holdings in fiscal 2025 increase available capital and BTC collateral for Bitcoin-related options, supporting premium income through fiscal 2026. Metaplanet converts yen to U.S. dollars for operations and Bitcoin purchases. The firm plans to continue separating Bitcoin price effects from foreign-exchange impacts in its disclosures and describes itself as a ”Bitcoin Treasury company,” publishing daily BTC holdings, unrealized gains/losses, and related metrics on its website. Metaplanet Stock Builds Range With Clear Technical Targets Metaplanet shares are trading within a broad consolidation pattern after a sharp rally triggered by the company's initial Bitcoin purchases. The weekly chart shows price action within a rising channel, with recent candles compressing into a defined accumulation range, signaling cooling momentum rather than a trend reversal, as higher lows hold above channel support. Volume expanded during the initial breakout, then faded during sideways action. Recent volume pickup near range lows suggests renewed buyer interest defending support. The volume profile shows heavy trading interest clustered below current price levels, often acting as a cushion during pullbacks. Technical analysis from X user Enea₿ highlights upside targets at $6.20 (¥900), $13.45 (¥1,954), and $30.50 (¥4,435) over a six-month horizon. These levels align with prior resistance and rising channel extensions but assume Bitcoin recovers toward $115,000 territory, keeping Metaplanet's equity tightly correlated to BTC price action. As long as price holds within the accumulation box and respects rising channel support, the broader structure remains bullish. A sustained breakout above the range would target the lower levels first, while channel support failure would undermine the setup. For now, the chart shows healthy consolidation within an established uptrend.
26 Jan 2026, 17:55
Important Binance Announcement Concerning Ukrainian Users: Details Inside

The world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange announced another delisting round, affecting numerous altcoin traders. At the same time, it will expand the list of trading choices offered on Binance Spot by adding six new pairs. Ukrainians Will Feel the Changes Binance conducted another periodic review on its listed spot pairs to check for vital factors, including liquidity and trading volume. Following the analysis, it decided to remove the following ones: BTC/UAH, COMP/BTC, ETC/ETH, MOVE/BNB, PNUT/FDUSD, SHIB/DOGE, TON/BTC, and others. The delisting will take effect on January 27 and will not affect the availability of the tokens on Binance Spot. “Users can still trade the spot trading pair’s base and quote assets on other trading pair(s) that are available on Binance,” the disclosure reads. The amendment is particularly important for Ukrainian clients. The Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH) is the official currency of the country, and the removal of a direction pair between BTC and the domestic currency can make it harder for locals to move in and out of the cryptocurrency market. As a result, Ukrainians may be forced to first convert their funds into another fiat currency before gaining exposure to the leading digital asset, adding extra friction to the process. Meanwhile, most tokens included in the delisting effort are in the red today (January 26), which is a rather normal reaction when Binance withdraws its support. However, the move south is more likely to have been caused by the broader market decline observed in the past few days. The Listing Announcement Contrary to the aforementioned disclosure, the company also revealed that it will expand the list of choices on Binance Spot and “enhance users’ trading experience” by adding BNB/U, ETH/U, KGST/U, SOL/U, TRX/USD1, and USD1/U. The inclusion is scheduled again for January 27. U refers to United Stables, a stablecoin that saw the light of day towards the end of last year and is pegged to the American dollar. To stimulate users onboarding of the new services, Binance introduced zero maker fees on BNB/U, ETH/U, KGST/U, SOL/U, and USD1/U until further notice. “During the Validity Period, Standard taker fees will apply to regular and VIP 1 users for BNB/U, ETH/U, and SOL/U, and the trading volume of these pairs will count toward regular and VIP 1 users’ VIP tier calculation,” the announcement reads. The post Important Binance Announcement Concerning Ukrainian Users: Details Inside appeared first on CryptoPotato .
26 Jan 2026, 17:52
Survey flags blocked, delayed bank transactions targeting UK crypto platforms

The UK crypto industry is experiencing increased friction with the country’s banking sector. A new survey of crypto platforms operating in the country found that nearly 40% of all transactions are blocked or delayed by banks. The UK’s banking sector is allegedly “debanking” crypto platforms operating in the jurisdiction. A recent survey by the UK Cryptoasset Business Council (UKCBC) revealed that nearly 40% of all transactions to crypto exchanges are blocked or delayed by banks, causing inconvenience and customer friction. Debanking concerns on crypto platforms in the UK intensify, survey shows The report named “Locked Out: Debanking the UK’s Digital Asset Economy” noted that the “ debanking ” trend is worsening amid the implementation of new restrictions. According to the survey report, the “action by UK banks is incompatible with the City Minister’s recent statement of the UK government’s plans to make the ‘UK at the top of the list for cryptoassets firms looking to grow.'” The UKCBC surveyed ten of the largest crypto exchange platforms in the UK, including Coinbase, Uphold, Kraken, Zumo, Wirex, OKX, Luno, Bitpanda, Xapo Bank, and Gemini. These exchanges offer crypto services to millions of UK citizens and have processed hundreds of billions of pounds in transactions. One crypto exchange said it had experienced a decline in transactions worth £1 billion ($1.2 billion) over the past year due to bank-side rejections of card payments and bank transfers in the UK alone. The survey found that 80% of exchanges reported an increase in customer friction due to blocked, delayed, or limited transfers over the past 12 months. Only two exchanges reported no changes, while one reported an increase. The survey also found that 70% of UK crypto exchanges described the prevailing UK banking environment for crypto enterprises as deteriorating into greater hostility. All exchanges said that banks do not provide clear reasons for blocking transactions or restricting accounts. The report also highlighted that Wise and Revolut , leading international money transfer platforms, have entered the crypto space, yet they also block, delay, and limit transactions to other crypto platforms. The UKCBC reported that the debanking challenge is undermining domestic innovation and driving competition overseas. Countries like the U.S. have initiated processes of streamlining the clarity of crypto assets, a move that is set to merge traditional finance with decentralized assets. UKCBC gives recommendations to solve UK bank-crypto friction The UKCBC gave several recommendations to improve the UK’s financial ecosystem by bridging crypto exchanges with the traditional banking sector. The council recommended that the FCA require banks to establish a risk-based framework that recognizes the diversity of centralized exchanges and encourages close interactions between banks and legislators. The council also urged the FCA and the UK government to encourage banks to move away from treating all retail crypto users as equally “high risk.” The council’s report also recommended that the FCA mandate banks to remove unnecessary frictions for exchanges registered under the FCA and promote anti-competitive practices. The UKCBC also advised the UK government to create a forum for regular engagement among regulators, banks, and crypto exchanges to tackle issues such as fraud and other criminal activities. The news comes after Cryptopolitan reported on January 26 that the UK’s biggest banks will raise profit targets in the near future, after recording strong earnings. The publication noted that rising interest rates and cost-control measures are driving better-than-expected performance. Sources familiar with the matter revealed that NatWest intends to boost its 2027 projection from the current 15% to possibly 17%. The analysts also predicted that Barclays and HSBC could raise their targets by up to 200 basis points after outlining their strategies for the following years. European banking shares have risen dramatically after years of low profitability since the financial crisis. The sector’s valuation has more than doubled since early 2024 and risen 60% in the last year, casting a shadow over U.S. banks. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .
26 Jan 2026, 17:50
Bitcoin Price Defies Logic: Why a Weaker Dollar Fails to Spark Rally in 2025’s Fearful Market

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Defies Logic: Why a Weaker Dollar Fails to Spark Rally in 2025’s Fearful Market In a surprising twist for global markets in early 2025, the Bitcoin price remains stubbornly subdued despite a notable decline in the US Dollar Index (DXY). This counterintuitive dynamic challenges a long-held market axiom and underscores a profound shift in investor psychology, according to a detailed on-chain analysis. Traditionally, cryptocurrency investors have viewed dollar weakness as a direct tailwind for digital assets. However, current conditions reveal a more complex relationship where macroeconomic fear overrides conventional catalysts. Bitcoin Price and the Broken Dollar Correlation The inverse correlation between the US dollar and Bitcoin has formed a cornerstone of crypto market analysis for years. Historically, a falling dollar often signals easier global financial conditions, potentially driving capital toward alternative, non-fiat stores of value. Consequently, analysts frequently cite dollar weakness as a bullish signal for cryptocurrencies. Recent data, however, paints a different picture. The DXY has retreated from recent highs, yet the Bitcoin price continues to trade within a tight, fearful range, lacking upward momentum. This decoupling prompts a critical re-examination of the underlying drivers for crypto asset valuation. GugaOnChain, a noted CryptoQuant contributor and on-chain analyst, provides crucial context for this anomaly. The analyst’s research, reported by CryptoPotato, indicates that a weaker dollar alone is an insufficient catalyst. Instead, it must coincide with specific macroeconomic conditions to fuel a sustainable Bitcoin rally. These conditions primarily include persistent high inflation and abundant systemic liquidity. In such an environment, investors actively seek inflation hedges outside the traditional financial system. Currently, neither condition is fully met, leaving the typical transmission mechanism between dollar value and crypto prices effectively broken. Macroeconomic Fear Drives a Flight to Safety The dominant theme in 2025’s first quarter is a potent risk-off sentiment sweeping across global financial markets. Several factors contribute to this climate of caution. Geopolitical tensions continue to simmer, central banks maintain a restrictive stance compared to the zero-rate era, and concerns about economic growth linger. In this environment, fear governs asset allocation decisions. Investors demonstrate a clear preference for capital preservation over aggressive growth speculation. This psychology directly impacts the Bitcoin price, as the asset’s perceived volatility conflicts with the desire for stability. When fear dominates, capital flows toward assets with centuries of established trust. Gold, the quintessential safe haven, has notably outperformed Bitcoin during recent periods of dollar weakness. This trend highlights a critical distinction in investor perception. Despite being labeled “digital gold” by proponents, Bitcoin has not yet universally achieved that status during systemic stress. The analyst emphasizes that during crises of confidence and extreme risk aversion—scenarios that can also weaken the dollar—cryptocurrencies often decline in tandem with risk assets like stocks. This correlation with equities, rather than decoupling as a true safe haven, currently exerts more influence on the Bitcoin price than dollar movements. The Crucial Role of Liquidity and Inflation To understand the missing link, one must analyze the liquidity landscape. The period of rampant quantitative easing (QE) post-2020 created a massive pool of cheap capital that flowed into various risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. That liquidity tide has receded. Current monetary policy, while not uniformly tight globally, lacks the firehose-like abundance of previous years. Without this excess liquidity sloshing through the system, even a weaker dollar struggles to push significant new capital into the crypto ecosystem. The mechanism is clogged. Similarly, the inflation narrative has evolved. While inflation remains above central bank targets in many economies, the peak fear of hyperinflation or a complete loss of fiat credibility has subsided. This moderation reduces the urgent, panic-driven demand for alternative stores of value. The table below contrasts the historical catalyst environment with current conditions: Macro Factor Historical Rally Catalyst (e.g., 2020-2021) Current Market State (Early 2025) US Dollar Trend Falling Falling Systemic Liquidity Abundant (QE) Restricted / Normalized Inflation Psychology Rising Fear / “Fiat Debasement” Managed Fear / Contained Overall Market Sentiment Risk-On Risk-Off Primary Beneficiary Bitcoin & Risk Assets Gold & Treasuries This comparative analysis clearly shows why the outcome differs despite a similar dollar trend. The surrounding conditions dictate the market’s reaction. Key takeaways for investors include: Context is paramount: Isolated indicators like the DXY provide limited insight. Sentiment dictates flows: Fear overwhelms theoretical correlations. Liquidity is the lifeblood: Without it, price catalysts remain dormant. On-Chain Data and Investor Behavior Beyond macroeconomic theory, on-chain metrics offer a real-time window into investor behavior that explains the stagnant Bitcoin price. Analysis of exchange flows shows neither significant accumulation nor aggressive distribution, indicating a wait-and-see approach. Furthermore, the velocity of Bitcoin—the rate at which it changes hands—remains low. This suggests that existing holders are not transacting actively, and new speculative capital is not entering the network at a scale needed to drive a rally. The market is in a state of equilibrium, biased slightly toward fear. The behavior of long-term holders (LTHs) versus short-term holders (STHs) is particularly telling. LTHs continue to hold steadfast, showing conviction, but they are not providing buying pressure. STHs, typically the source of volatile trading, are inactive or are selling at minimal profits or losses, reflecting the risk-off environment. This stagnation in network activity underscores that a weaker dollar, without accompanying positive sentiment or a compelling macro narrative, fails to trigger the algorithmic and human trading decisions that propel prices upward. Historical Precedents and Market Maturation This is not the first time Bitcoin’s correlation with the dollar has broken down. Similar periods occurred during the 2018 bear market and phases of the 2022 downturn. Each instance coincided with a contraction in global liquidity and a flight to safety. However, the market structure in 2025 is more mature. The presence of institutional players, regulated ETFs, and more sophisticated derivatives means reactions to macro data are more nuanced and less driven by retail speculation alone. This maturation may lead to more frequent periods of decoupling as Bitcoin finds its own equilibrium based on a broader set of factors, including: Adoption metrics and network utility Regulatory developments Institutional custody flows Global accessibility and legal tender status in select nations Conclusion The analysis reveals a critical lesson for 2025: the Bitcoin price does not move in a vacuum based on a single inverse indicator like the US dollar. Its trajectory is a complex function of liquidity, macroeconomic sentiment, and competing safe-haven assets. The current risk-off climate, characterized by fear and a preference for traditional stores of value like gold, has severed the simple weak-dollar-strong-Bitcoin narrative. For a sustained rally to materialize, the market likely requires a shift back to a risk-on mindset, coupled with renewed liquidity or a sharp resurgence in inflation fears. Until then, dollar weakness alone will remain an insufficient catalyst, highlighting the cryptocurrency market’s ongoing integration into and reaction to broader global financial dynamics. FAQs Q1: Why isn’t Bitcoin rising if the US dollar is getting weaker? A1: A weaker dollar typically helps Bitcoin only when combined with high inflation and abundant market liquidity. Currently, widespread risk-off sentiment and fear are driving investors toward traditional safe havens like gold instead, overriding the dollar’s influence. Q2: What does “risk-off sentiment” mean for cryptocurrency? A2: Risk-off sentiment describes a market environment where investors prioritize safety and capital preservation. They sell volatile assets like stocks and cryptocurrencies and move money into perceived stable assets such as government bonds, gold, and stable currencies, leading to downward pressure on the Bitcoin price. Q3: Has the correlation between Bitcoin and the US dollar changed permanently? A3: Not necessarily. Correlations in financial markets are dynamic. The relationship may reassert itself if macroeconomic conditions shift back to a high-liquidity, risk-on environment. The current decoupling shows Bitcoin’s price drivers are multifaceted and context-dependent. Q4: What macroeconomic conditions would help Bitcoin rise alongside a weaker dollar? A4: Key conditions include aggressive monetary easing (creating new liquidity), a sharp rise in inflation expectations that undermines faith in fiat currency, and a general shift in investor psychology from fear to optimism about economic growth and risk assets. Q5: How does gold’s performance relate to Bitcoin’s current price action? A5: Gold’s outperformance during this period of dollar weakness acts as a clear signal of the market’s risk-off preference. Capital is flowing into the established, centuries-old store of value rather than the newer digital alternative, demonstrating that in times of acute fear, perceived stability trumps technological innovation for many investors. This post Bitcoin Price Defies Logic: Why a Weaker Dollar Fails to Spark Rally in 2025’s Fearful Market first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
26 Jan 2026, 17:45
CLARITY Act Ignites Hope: Jefferies Sees Regulatory Turning Point for Mass Tokenization

BitcoinWorld CLARITY Act Ignites Hope: Jefferies Sees Regulatory Turning Point for Mass Tokenization NEW YORK, March 2025 – A pivotal analysis from global investment bank Jefferies frames the proposed U.S. CLARITY Act not merely as another piece of legislation but as a potential catalyst for a fundamental shift in finance. The report suggests this regulatory move could unlock a long-anticipated surge in asset tokenization across traditional financial institutions. This assessment arrives at a critical juncture, as blockchain infrastructure reaches new levels of maturity and the market clamors for definitive rules. The CLARITY Act: A Potential Inflection Point for Tokenization Jefferies’ recent research note, cited by financial news outlets including CoinDesk, places significant weight on the legislative proposal formally known as the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act. The bank’s analysts argue that the act’s primary function—to establish a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins—serves as a foundational step for broader digital asset adoption. Consequently, this regulatory scaffolding could accelerate institutional confidence in tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs). Tokenization, the process of converting rights to an asset into a digital token on a blockchain, promises profound efficiency gains. These gains include near-instant settlement, enhanced liquidity for traditionally illiquid assets, and automated compliance through smart contracts. However, widespread adoption has historically faced a significant barrier: regulatory uncertainty. The CLARITY Act directly addresses a core component of this ecosystem, potentially clearing a major path forward. Building Blocks: Mature Infrastructure Meets Regulatory Momentum The Jefferies report does not view the CLARITY Act in isolation. Instead, it contextualizes the legislation within a broader technological and regulatory trajectory that has been building for years. The analysis highlights two concurrent developments creating a fertile ground for change. First, blockchain infrastructure has demonstrably matured. Enterprise-grade platforms now offer the security, scalability, and interoperability required by large financial institutions. Second, global regulatory bodies are progressively moving from a stance of observation to one of active framework development. This dual progress lays essential groundwork for the tokenization trend Jefferies anticipates. Expert Analysis on Market Structure Definition The Jefferies analysis emphasizes a crucial nuance. While the CLARITY Act focuses on stablecoins, its passage could spur faster action on a more comprehensive U.S. crypto market structure bill. A precise legal definition for digital asset securities, commodities, and payment instruments remains the holy grail for institutional deployment. Clear rules would allow banks, asset managers, and insurers to allocate capital and develop products with defined compliance parameters. Financial technology experts often cite the need for this clarity. They argue that without it, institutions operate in a gray area, limiting innovation to pilot programs and proofs-of-concept. The table below contrasts the current state with the potential post-CLARITY Act environment: Aspect Current Environment Potential Post-CLARITY Environment Stablecoin Issuance Fragmented state-level rules, federal uncertainty Federal chartering options, clear reserve & redemption standards Institutional On-Ramps Complex, bespoke compliance for each bank Standardized custody and transaction rules for regulated entities Tokenization Pilots Limited to private networks, small scale Potential for interoperable public/private networks, larger scale Assessing the Impact on Financial Ecosystems Jefferies projects that the impact of regulatory clarity would ripple across multiple sectors with tangible effects. The report identifies three primary beneficiary groups should the legislative trend solidify. Traditional Financial Institutions: Major banks and asset managers could aggressively develop tokenized offerings for treasury bonds, private equity funds, and trade finance. This would create new revenue streams and improve operational efficiency. Blockchain-Based Companies: Infrastructure providers,合规 technology firms, and security auditors would see demand surge as institutions seek partners to build compliant systems. The Broader Tokenization Industry: Success in financial markets could spur tokenization in adjacent fields like real estate, carbon credits, and intellectual property, creating a more unified digital asset economy. Despite this optimistic outlook, the report acknowledges legislative uncertainty. The passage of the CLARITY Act, or any major market structure bill, involves a complex political process. However, Jefferies suggests that even the serious debate and progression of such legislation can have a market-positive effect, signaling to institutions that the regulatory endpoint is in sight. Conclusion The analysis from Jefferies positions the U.S. CLARITY Act as more than a stablecoin rulebook. It represents a potential keystone in the arch of modern financial infrastructure. By addressing a fundamental layer of the digital asset stack, the act could catalyze a wave of institutional tokenization that leverages now-mature blockchain technology. While its passage is not guaranteed, the very pursuit of such clarity marks a significant step away from ambiguity and toward a structured future for finance. The coming months will be critical in determining whether this potential turning point for tokenization becomes a reality. FAQs Q1: What is the CLARITY Act? The Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act is a proposed U.S. law aimed at creating a federal regulatory framework for issuers of payment stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value relative to a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar. Q2: Why does Jefferies link the CLARITY Act to asset tokenization? Jefferies analysts believe that clear regulation for stablecoins, a key tool for settling tokenized asset transactions, would reduce risk and uncertainty for traditional financial institutions, thereby encouraging them to pursue larger-scale tokenization projects. Q3: What is asset tokenization? Asset tokenization is the process of converting the ownership rights of a physical or financial asset (like real estate, bonds, or art) into a digital token on a blockchain. This can make assets more divisible, easier to transfer, and simpler to track. Q4: What are the main hurdles to institutional tokenization today? The primary hurdles include regulatory uncertainty, concerns over compliance and anti-money laundering rules, technological integration challenges with legacy systems, and questions about the legal enforceability of smart contracts. Q5: Has tokenization been successful anywhere yet? Yes, several successful pilots and limited productions exist. For example, central banks are exploring wholesale central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) for settlements, and financial institutions in Europe and Asia have tokenized government bonds and money market funds on regulated platforms. This post CLARITY Act Ignites Hope: Jefferies Sees Regulatory Turning Point for Mass Tokenization first appeared on BitcoinWorld .







































