Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%

PRICE
+16.98%
$0.01247

PRICE
+4.93%
$0.03454

PRICE
+4.83%
$0.1871

PRICE
+2.12%
$0.6943

PRICE
+1.22%
$0.08847

PRICE
+1.08%
$1.04

PRICE
+0.82%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.78%
$0.08512

PRICE
+0.34%
$0.3243

PRICE
+0.03%
$115.06

PRICE
+0.03%
$1.14

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9997

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9983

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.01

PRICE
+0%
$1.13

PRICE
+0%
$1.11

PRICE
+0%
$1

PRICE
+0%
$1.23

PRICE
+0%
$11.06

PRICE
+0%
$1

VOL24
+82,084.04%
$1.04
VOL24
+1,588.35%
$0.01247

VOL24
+1,195.44%
$0.9999

VOL24
+469.08%
$0.9983

VOL24
+276.36%
$1.01

VOL24
+167.4%
$0.6940

VOL24
+122.33%
$1.0000

VOL24
+120.16%
$0.9988

VOL24
+92.65%
$0.1926
VOL24
+73.44%
$0.02946

VOL24
+70.23%
$0.07351

VOL24
+69.54%
$1.01

VOL24
+60.93%
$7.28

VOL24
+58.5%
$1.0000

VOL24
+50.33%
$4,637.78

VOL24
+49.94%
$2,282.17

VOL24
+46.84%
$0.1487

VOL24
+43.73%
$0.9302

VOL24
+41.62%
$0.9994

VOL24
+40.97%
$0.03435

VOL24
+38.53%
$0.2534

VOL24
+36.62%
$0.09190

VOL24
+36.34%
$0.3243

VOL24
+35.25%
$1.4

VOL24
+33.72%
$41.06
PRICE
+16.98%
$0.01247

PRICE
+4.93%
$0.03454

PRICE
+4.83%
$0.1871

PRICE
+2.12%
$0.6943

PRICE
+1.22%
$0.08847

PRICE
+1.08%
$1.04

PRICE
+0.82%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.78%
$0.08512

PRICE
+0.34%
$0.3243

PRICE
+0.03%
$115.06

PRICE
+0.03%
$1.14

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9997

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9983

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.01

PRICE
+0%
$1.13

PRICE
+0%
$1.11

PRICE
+0%
$1

PRICE
+0%
$1.23

PRICE
+0%
$11.06

PRICE
+0%
$1

VOL24
+82,084.04%
$1.04
VOL24
+1,588.35%
$0.01247

VOL24
+1,195.44%
$0.9999

VOL24
+469.08%
$0.9983

VOL24
+276.36%
$1.01

VOL24
+167.4%
$0.6940

VOL24
+122.33%
$1.0000

VOL24
+120.16%
$0.9988

VOL24
+92.65%
$0.1926
VOL24
+73.44%
$0.02946

VOL24
+70.23%
$0.07351

VOL24
+69.54%
$1.01

VOL24
+60.93%
$7.28

VOL24
+58.5%
$1.0000

VOL24
+50.33%
$4,637.78

VOL24
+49.94%
$2,282.17

VOL24
+46.84%
$0.1487

VOL24
+43.73%
$0.9302

VOL24
+41.62%
$0.9994

VOL24
+40.97%
$0.03435

VOL24
+38.53%
$0.2534

VOL24
+36.62%
$0.09190

VOL24
+36.34%
$0.3243

VOL24
+35.25%
$1.4

VOL24
+33.72%
$41.06
Rise 40%
Fall 60%

$0.00
#34138
$0.00
$0.00
0
0
16 Apr 2026, 16:06

As of mid-April 2026, the "Machine Economy" is no longer a theoretical concept—it is a measurable market force. With AI agents now executing millions of autonomous transactions via the x402 protocol and decentralized GPU demand reaching all-time highs, the "Web3 Backend" sector is facing a critical technical crossroads. The Graph (GRT) and Akash Network (AKT) have emerged as the primary infrastructure proxies for this rotation: one serving as the "Google of Blockchains" for AI agents, and the other as the "Open-Source AWS" for their compute needs. The Graph (GRT): Early Recovery, Still Heavy Overhead Source: tradingview The Graph is currently undergoing its most significant evolution since inception: the rollout of the Horizon Protocol. Following the December 2025 transition to a modular architecture, GRT has moved beyond simple subgraphs. The Q1 2026 launch of the x402-compliant Subgraph gateway has officially enabled AI agents to autonomously query and pay for data in real-time, effectively turning GRT into the primary data layer for the "Agentic Web." Technically, GRT is in an "early basing" phase. At $0.025, it has successfully reclaimed its 7-day ($0.0243) and 30-day ($0.0246) moving averages, but it remains heavily suppressed by its 200-day average ($0.0426). With a 99% drawdown from its peak, the token is fighting through massive overhead supply from multi-year bagholders. GRT Price Scenarios: Base Case: Sideways oscillation in a -20% to +30% band (approx. $0.020–$0.033). AI/data headlines are providing a floor, but the market is waiting for evidence of sustained query fee burns from AI agents before a full re-rating. Bullish Path: A "Web3 Backend" rotation targeting $0.035–$0.045 (+40% to +80%). This would require a clean break above the 200-day SMA, likely triggered by a surge in Amp (The Graph's new enterprise SQL database) adoption by institutional fintechs. Bearish Path: A rotation fade toward $0.016–$0.019 (-25% to -35%). If capital flows back into high-performance L1s, GRT's weak long-term trend makes it vulnerable to one more "flush" before a final bottom. Akash Network (AKT): Firmer Trend, Testing The 200-Day SMA Source: tradingview Akash Network is currently reaping the rewards of the Burn-Mint Equilibrium (BME) activation on March 22, 2026. This economic milestone, powered by Pyth oracles, has finally stabilized compute pricing in USD terms, making it viable for enterprise-grade AI pre-training. Furthermore, Akash's support for NVIDIA Blackwell (B200/B300) GPUs has allowed decentralized providers to capture high-scale workloads that were previously exclusive to hyperscalers like AWS. Structurally, AKT is much stronger than GRT. At $0.51, it is actively testing its 200-day SMA ($0.509) from below. While the MACD histogram (-0.0022) suggests a minor momentum cool-off after its 11% weekly pump, the price is holding firm, indicating that a breakout attempt is in the works. AKT Price Scenarios: Base Case: Constructive range-play between $0.41 and $0.66 (-20% to +30%). Dips toward the $0.45 (7-day SMA) are likely to be bought by those betting on the upcoming Confidential Computing (AEP-65) rollout. Bullish Path: An AI compute leg targeting $0.68–$0.82 (+35% to +60%). A clean break and hold above the 200-day MA would signal a total trend reversal, potentially driven by the announcement of the Shared Security partner (Cosmos vs. Solana) for the Akash L1. Bearish Path: A rejection at the 200-day line leading to a slide toward $0.33–$0.38 (-25% to -35%). This is the risk if GPU utilization rates drop or if hardware supply chains for Blackwell chips favor centralized clouds in the short term. Conclusion The "Web3 Backend" trade is currently a tale of two different technical stages. Akash (AKT) is the clear leader, showing a visible recovery and testing its long-term trendline on the back of real-world compute demand. The Graph (GRT) is the lagging, "deep value" play that offers higher optionality if the AI agent query narrative gains mass adoption. If AI infrastructure capital continues to expand through Q2 2026, AKT is the more likely candidate to lead the next leg higher, while GRT remains a high-beta catch-up play. If the narrative stalls, both are likely to stay in wide ranges, with AKT retreating to its averages and GRT drifting back into its search for a permanent floor. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
11 Mar 2026, 14:20

Supply is tightening, sentiment is rising… but can AKT’s rally push toward $1 milestone?
8 Mar 2026, 21:00

AKT surges as BME vote approaches, with traders watching closely for a decisive breakout.
7 Mar 2026, 02:10

BitcoinWorld Akash Network’s Crucial Vote: Revolutionary Burn-Mint Equilibrium Model to Transform AKT Tokenomics The decentralized cloud computing sector faces a pivotal moment today as Akash Network initiates an on-chain governance vote that could fundamentally reshape the economic foundations of its native AKT token. This crucial decision centers on implementing a Burn-Mint Equilibrium model designed to directly link token value to network utility. Consequently, the outcome will determine whether Akash Network establishes a more sustainable economic framework for its growing decentralized infrastructure platform. Akash Network’s Burn-Mint Equilibrium Proposal Explained Akash Network’s governance community began voting on March 7 on Proposal 257, which introduces a comprehensive Burn-Mint Equilibrium framework. This model represents a significant departure from traditional token emission schedules. Specifically, the BME approach permanently removes AKT tokens from circulation whenever users deploy computing resources on the network. Therefore, token burning becomes an integral part of the platform’s operational mechanics rather than a separate inflationary control mechanism. The proposed system establishes a direct correlation between network usage and token scarcity. For instance, every deployment on Akash’s decentralized cloud platform would trigger an automatic burn of the corresponding AKT payment. This mechanism creates what developers describe as “utility-backed deflation” where increased platform adoption naturally reduces token supply. Meanwhile, the network maintains its security through controlled minting for validator rewards, creating equilibrium between burning and minting activities. Technical Implementation and Upgrade Timeline If the governance proposal receives approval, Akash Network will execute a scheduled mainnet upgrade on March 23 at 2:00 p.m. UTC. This technical implementation requires validators to update their node software to version 2.0, which incorporates the BME module into the chain’s consensus mechanism. The upgrade process follows established blockchain governance protocols where validators coordinate to implement changes without disrupting network operations. The technical specifications reveal several important implementation details: Burn Address Integration: The upgrade creates a dedicated, unspendable burn address where all deployment payments automatically transfer Real-time Burning: Token burning occurs immediately upon successful deployment execution rather than through delayed batch processing Transparent Tracking: All burn transactions will be publicly verifiable on-chain through dedicated explorers and dashboards Validator Coordination: Network validators must complete the software upgrade within a specified timeframe to ensure consensus continuity Economic Implications for AKT Holders and Users The Burn-Mint Equilibrium model introduces profound economic implications for various network participants. For token holders, the deflationary pressure from burning could potentially increase scarcity as platform adoption grows. However, this relationship depends entirely on actual network usage rather than speculative trading activity. Users deploying applications face predictable costs since burning occurs transparently as part of standard deployment fees. Network validators experience modified reward structures under the new system. While they continue receiving AKT rewards for securing the network, the equilibrium mechanism adjusts minting rates based on burning activity. This creates a self-regulating system where token supply responds dynamically to platform demand. Consequently, the economic model aligns incentives across all participant groups toward increasing genuine network utility. Comparative Analysis with Other Token Models Akash Network’s proposed approach differs significantly from other token economic models in the blockchain space. Traditional proof-of-stake networks typically rely on fixed inflation schedules that dilute holder value over time. Meanwhile, some platforms implement occasional manual burning events that lack direct connection to platform usage. The BME model represents a hybrid approach that combines automatic burning with controlled minting. The table below illustrates key differences between token economic models: Model Type Supply Mechanism Utility Connection Examples Fixed Inflation Predictable new token issuance Indirect through staking Cosmos, Polkadot Manual Burning Periodic discretionary burns Weak or speculative Binance Coin (historical) Burn-Mint Equilibrium Usage-based burning with security minting Direct and automatic Akash Network (proposed) Historical Context and Governance Precedents Akash Network’s governance system has previously approved several significant protocol upgrades, establishing a track record of community-led decision-making. The platform transitioned to mainnet in 2020 and has since implemented multiple enhancements through on-chain voting. Each proposal requires a quorum of participating stake and a supermajority threshold for approval, ensuring decisions reflect broad consensus among active network participants. The current proposal follows extensive community discussion and technical analysis. Developers published multiple forum posts detailing the economic rationale behind the BME model. Additionally, they conducted simulation testing to project potential supply impacts under various adoption scenarios. This thorough preparation reflects the network’s mature approach to governance, where major economic changes undergo rigorous scrutiny before reaching the voting stage. Expert Perspectives on Token Economic Design Blockchain economists note that effective token models must balance multiple competing objectives. Security requirements demand sufficient validator rewards, while user adoption benefits from predictable costs. Meanwhile, long-term sustainability requires mechanisms that prevent excessive inflation or deflation. The Burn-Mint Equilibrium approach attempts to address all three considerations through its automated balancing mechanism. Industry analysts observe that successful token economic models typically share several characteristics. First, they establish clear value accrual mechanisms for token holders. Second, they maintain security through appropriate validator incentives. Third, they create sustainable ecosystems that can evolve with changing market conditions. Akash Network’s proposal appears designed to address each of these criteria through its usage-based burning approach. Potential Impact on Decentralized Cloud Computing The decentralized cloud computing sector represents a rapidly growing segment of the broader blockchain infrastructure market. Platforms like Akash Network enable users to deploy applications on distributed hardware resources, often at lower costs than traditional cloud providers. However, sustainable economic models remain crucial for long-term viability in this competitive space. Successful implementation of the Burn-Mint Equilibrium model could provide Akash Network with several competitive advantages. The direct link between usage and token economics creates natural alignment between platform growth and token value. Furthermore, the transparent burning mechanism offers clear visibility into actual network utilization. These factors could potentially attract both users seeking cost-effective deployment options and investors looking for utility-backed assets. Conclusion Akash Network’s on-chain governance vote represents a defining moment for the platform’s economic future and the broader decentralized cloud computing sector. The proposed Burn-Mint Equilibrium model introduces an innovative approach to token economics that directly connects burning activity to network usage. If approved, this framework could establish new standards for utility-driven token design while potentially enhancing AKT’s value proposition through genuine scarcity mechanisms. The March 23 implementation deadline now awaits community decision through this crucial governance process. FAQs Q1: What exactly is the Burn-Mint Equilibrium model proposed by Akash Network? The Burn-Mint Equilibrium is a token economic framework where all AKT tokens used for deploying applications on the network are permanently burned, while new tokens are minted only for validator rewards, creating a balance between burning and minting based on actual network usage. Q2: How does the voting process work for this Akash Network proposal? The on-chain governance vote requires AKT holders to stake their tokens with validators who then vote proportionally to their stake. The proposal needs to achieve both a quorum of participating tokens and a supermajority approval threshold to pass. Q3: What happens if the Akash Network token burn proposal fails to pass? If the proposal fails, the current token economic model will remain in place, and the scheduled March 23 network upgrade will not include the Burn-Mint Equilibrium implementation. The development team would likely need to revise the proposal based on community feedback. Q4: How will the token burn mechanism affect AKT token supply over time? The token supply will become dynamically responsive to network usage, with increased platform adoption leading to greater burning activity and potentially decreasing circulating supply, assuming minting for validator rewards remains below burning levels. Q5: Can users opt out of the token burning mechanism if the proposal passes? No, the burning mechanism would be integrated directly into the network’s payment processing, meaning all AKT used for deployments would automatically burn as part of the standard transaction process without optional participation. This post Akash Network’s Crucial Vote: Revolutionary Burn-Mint Equilibrium Model to Transform AKT Tokenomics first appeared on BitcoinWorld .