Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%

PRICE
+6.2%
$0.03229

PRICE
+4.53%
$0.03465

PRICE
+3.99%
$0.07771

PRICE
+3%
$0.03472

PRICE
+2%
$101.4
PRICE
+1.86%
$0.03926
PRICE
+1.85%
$0.01061

PRICE
+1.79%
$0.4246

PRICE
+1.4%
$1.04

PRICE
+1.24%
$1.15

PRICE
+1.12%
$97.16

PRICE
+0.80%
$4,691.58

PRICE
+0.28%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.27%
$0.1110

PRICE
+0.27%
$7.53

PRICE
+0.27%
$10.21

PRICE
+0.24%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.23%
$81,547.33

PRICE
+0.14%
$0.9981

PRICE
+0.10%
$0.9993

PRICE
+0.04%
$59.95
PRICE
+0.03%
$659.72

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9993

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9990

VOL24
+5,830.14%
$1.0000

VOL24
+479.25%
$1.01

VOL24
+381.23%
$0.9993

VOL24
+378.67%
$0.9990

VOL24
+370.39%
$4,707.95

VOL24
+296.08%
$4,691.58

VOL24
+263.72%
$0.07771

VOL24
+211.89%
$0.9982

VOL24
+190.83%
$2,327.88

VOL24
+183.12%
$59.95

VOL24
+181.44%
$0.03465

VOL24
+177.06%
$1.13

VOL24
+150.32%
$0.1110

VOL24
+140.45%
$0.9996

VOL24
+136.15%
$0.07571

VOL24
+97.51%
$41.79

VOL24
+89.95%
$81,547.33

VOL24
+79.75%
$10.56

VOL24
+79.26%
$2.02
VOL24
+78.7%
$0.01061

VOL24
+75.14%
$0.9998

VOL24
+73.4%
$0.2356

VOL24
+72.09%
$1.48

VOL24
+70.39%
$0.4246
VOL24
+70.33%
$0.03229
PRICE
+6.2%
$0.03229

PRICE
+4.53%
$0.03465

PRICE
+3.99%
$0.07771

PRICE
+3%
$0.03472

PRICE
+2%
$101.4
PRICE
+1.86%
$0.03926
PRICE
+1.85%
$0.01061

PRICE
+1.79%
$0.4246

PRICE
+1.4%
$1.04

PRICE
+1.24%
$1.15

PRICE
+1.12%
$97.16

PRICE
+0.80%
$4,691.58

PRICE
+0.28%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.27%
$0.1110

PRICE
+0.27%
$7.53

PRICE
+0.27%
$10.21

PRICE
+0.24%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.23%
$81,547.33

PRICE
+0.14%
$0.9981

PRICE
+0.10%
$0.9993

PRICE
+0.04%
$59.95
PRICE
+0.03%
$659.72

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9993

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9990

VOL24
+5,830.14%
$1.0000

VOL24
+479.25%
$1.01

VOL24
+381.23%
$0.9993

VOL24
+378.67%
$0.9990

VOL24
+370.39%
$4,707.95

VOL24
+296.08%
$4,691.58

VOL24
+263.72%
$0.07771

VOL24
+211.89%
$0.9982

VOL24
+190.83%
$2,327.88

VOL24
+183.12%
$59.95

VOL24
+181.44%
$0.03465

VOL24
+177.06%
$1.13

VOL24
+150.32%
$0.1110

VOL24
+140.45%
$0.9996

VOL24
+136.15%
$0.07571

VOL24
+97.51%
$41.79

VOL24
+89.95%
$81,547.33

VOL24
+79.75%
$10.56

VOL24
+79.26%
$2.02
VOL24
+78.7%
$0.01061

VOL24
+75.14%
$0.9998

VOL24
+73.4%
$0.2356

VOL24
+72.09%
$1.48

VOL24
+70.39%
$0.4246
VOL24
+70.33%
$0.03229
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$3.43
#27184
$0.00
$13.54
0
1,337.8
11 May 2026, 02:00

Uniswap rally gains strength as on-chain activity surges, but liquidity risks remain.
8 May 2026, 15:50

BitcoinWorld Uniswap (UNI) Price Outlook 2026–2030: Can the Token Reach $50? Uniswap remains one of the most influential protocols in decentralized finance, and its native token, UNI, continues to attract attention from traders and long-term investors alike. As the market evolves, questions about UNI’s price trajectory through 2026, 2027, and beyond have become increasingly common. This article provides a factual, fundamentals-based analysis of where UNI could be headed, without relying on hype or unfounded speculation. Understanding Uniswap’s Role in the DeFi Ecosystem Uniswap operates as a decentralized exchange (DEX) that uses an automated market maker (AMM) model, allowing users to trade cryptocurrencies without an intermediary. Since its launch in 2018, it has become a cornerstone of the DeFi sector, processing billions of dollars in trading volume monthly. The UNI token, introduced in September 2020, serves as a governance token, giving holders voting rights on protocol upgrades, fee structures, and treasury management. As of early 2026, Uniswap’s market position remains strong, though competition from other DEXs and aggregated liquidity platforms has intensified. The protocol’s ability to innovate—such as through its V3 and V4 iterations—has helped maintain its relevance. The upcoming Uniswap V4, which introduces hooks for custom liquidity pools, could further solidify its lead if adoption scales as expected. Key Factors Influencing UNI’s Price Several verifiable elements drive UNI’s valuation. First, total value locked (TVL) on the platform is a primary indicator of network health. Higher TVL typically correlates with increased trading fees and greater demand for governance participation. Second, regulatory clarity—or the lack thereof—directly impacts investor sentiment. In the United States, the SEC’s evolving stance on DeFi tokens has created uncertainty, though recent court rulings have offered some positive signals for decentralized protocols. Third, macroeconomic conditions, including interest rates and broader crypto market cycles, play a significant role. Historically, UNI has followed Bitcoin’s macro trends but with higher volatility due to its smaller market cap. Fourth, tokenomics matter: UNI has no hard supply cap, with a current inflation rate of about 2% per year. This inflationary pressure must be weighed against growing utility and potential fee-switch mechanisms that could redistribute value to token holders. Can UNI Realistically Reach $50? To reach $50 from current levels (approximately $8–$10 as of early 2026), UNI would need to increase roughly 5–6x. This would imply a market capitalization of around $30–$35 billion, assuming minimal supply dilution. For context, UNI’s all-time high near $45 in May 2021 occurred during a period of extreme market euphoria and record DeFi inflows. Reaching $50 again would require a combination of sustained DeFi adoption, a favorable regulatory environment, and a broader crypto bull market. While not impossible, a $50 target within the next 12–24 months appears optimistic without a major catalyst. More plausible is a gradual appreciation tied to Uniswap’s continued dominance and the maturation of the DeFi sector. By 2030, if Uniswap maintains its market share and crypto adoption expands globally, $50 becomes a more realistic long-term scenario—though not guaranteed. Risks and Uncertainties Investors should consider several risks. The DeFi space is highly competitive, with protocols like Curve, PancakeSwap, and new entrants vying for liquidity. A significant security breach or smart contract exploit could erode trust and reduce TVL. Regulatory actions, particularly in major economies, could impose compliance burdens that limit Uniswap’s accessibility. Additionally, the lack of a formal revenue-sharing mechanism for UNI holders means the token’s value is primarily speculative and governance-driven, rather than cash-flow based. Conclusion Uniswap remains a foundational project in decentralized finance, and UNI’s long-term value will depend on the protocol’s ability to innovate, attract liquidity, and navigate regulatory challenges. A $50 price target is achievable in a strong bull market scenario, but it is not a baseline expectation. Investors should focus on fundamentals—TVL trends, protocol upgrades, and market cycles—rather than short-term price predictions. As always, cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk, and diversification is essential. FAQs Q1: What is the current price of UNI? As of early 2026, UNI is trading in the range of $8 to $10, though prices fluctuate daily. Always check a reliable exchange for the latest quote. Q2: Does Uniswap have a maximum supply? No, UNI has an inflationary supply model. The initial total supply was 1 billion tokens, with a perpetual inflation rate of 2% per year, distributed to liquidity providers and stakers. Q3: What is the main use of the UNI token? UNI is primarily a governance token, allowing holders to vote on protocol proposals, including fee structures, treasury allocation, and future upgrades. It does not currently entitle holders to a share of trading fees. This post Uniswap (UNI) Price Outlook 2026–2030: Can the Token Reach $50? first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
8 May 2026, 14:03

LayerZero, a cross-chain messaging platform, is facing new accusations of operations security (OPSEC) failures. According to reports, its production multisig signing keys traded McPepes memecoin on Uniswap. Per the allegations, which were made public on May 8, 2026, faults were directed to key management techniques used by blockchain infrastructure companies. What happened with LayerZero’s 2-of-5 Gnosis Safe multisig? The accusations center on reckless use of LayerZero’s 2-of-5 Gnosis Safe multisig, a method by which they secure their users’ tokens and control key parts of their OFT infrastructure. From screenshots of an internal discussion that went viral on X, three of the five signers of the Gnosis Safe multisig were actively involved in activities unrelated to the multisig process. 🚨JUST IN: @LayerZero_Core is facing opsec allegations after production multisig keys used to secure user funds were reportedly also used to trade the McPepes memecoin. LayerZero’s Bryan said the transactions were made by people who were part of the LZ multisig but have since… pic.twitter.com/k5YR7jyCg6 — SolanaFloor (@SolanaFloor) May 8, 2026 Signer addresses include: 0x1f5E377a3ADBe6f3289ADb6b21eae6427dfbb553, which is associated with the trading of the memecoin called PEPES (McPepes) and the Hop platform. 0xBb6633c267951E938F9B6421E4F54aa5b2c19326, which held approximately $12 million and engaged in Stargate staking. 0x6fC8342C448F9a8d541C17579EF7A14237b8d5aD, involved in liquidity provisioning on Curve, PancakeSwap, and SpookySwap. A notable transaction on March 1, 2023, involved exchanging 0.198548073 ETH for approximately 1.73 million tokens of the ERC-20 token McPepes/PEPES via Uniswap V3. This has been cited as evidence that the production keys, whose purpose was to safeguard billions of dollars, were linked to websites outside the network, thereby leaving them vulnerable to phishing attacks. The multisig lacked a timelock, and the keys remained stagnant for several years. The same parties are responsible for the multisig-controlled DVN settings and libraries for LayerZero-compatible protocols . On-chain transactions support the assertion that the production signers performed Uniswap swaps for the McPepes prior to the PEPE token deployment schedule. Reported vulnerabilities tied to the multisig setup The LayerZero multisig was created to serve as the ultimate layer of protection for bridged tokens. Nevertheless, the described actions broke the fundamental OPSEC rule of key isolation. By using the same keys to trade on decentralized exchanges, the signers risked vulnerability to attacks from malicious contracts and phishing schemes. It is worth mentioning that only two stolen keys were enough to empty the whole multisig. The timing of the disclosure is associated with increased scrutiny of LayerZero’s security approach. As reported by Cryptopolitan, only hours before that, Solv Protocol revealed its intention to migrate more than $700 million worth of tokenized BTC (SolvBTC and xSolvBTC) to Chainlink’s CCIP from LayerZero. The company cited updates to security reviews and bridge issues, such as the recent Kelp DAO hack that used LayerZero bridges. Although Solv did not mention this incident in its announcement, it still illustrates a certain degree of skepticism toward LayerZero. LayerZero’s CEO Bryan Pellegrino speaks on the matter In response to the accusations, LayerZero’s CEO, Bryan Pellegrino, said the transactions originated from former members of the multisig wallet who had been booted out. He denied there was any such thing as “memecoin trading,” saying that it was just OFT testing, not speculations. Furthermore, he pointed out that the wallets were no longer involved in signatory functions. LayerZero CEO Bryan Pellegrino denies accusations. Source: X As shown in the screenshots, skeptics raised issues regarding the description of the incident, citing that the transaction was between McPepes (not PEPE) and raising doubts about how ETH to memecoin trading via Uniswap could be classified as OFT tests. The signers in question have reportedly been removed from the multi-signature. No counter-rebuttal or full audit of all previous actions carried out by the signers had been made public by LayerZero. Crypto Twitter goes after LayerZero Zach Rynes has gone against LayerZero, calling the security measures a “horrific opsec.” Rynes pointed out the dangers posed by such behavior to users running LayerZero in its default settings. He has cited potential supply-chain exploits. Additionally, he asserts that production keys must never be used for anything other than vital tasks. I genuinely wish I were joking, it’s horrifying what passes for “opsec” in this industry — Zach Rynes | CLG (@ChainLinkGod) May 8, 2026 X community reactions range from shock at what they perceived as “clowns and criminals” working within the infrastructure domain to a call for more openness and transparency. Any potential vulnerabilities within the multisig of LayerZero, which acts as an intermediary for chain-to-chain communication, could be very concerning. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
8 May 2026, 00:55

BitcoinWorld US Government Moves $33K in Seized UNI, CRO, and LINK to Coinbase Prime A U.S. government-controlled wallet has deposited approximately $33,000 worth of seized cryptocurrencies into Coinbase Prime, according to blockchain analytics firm Onchain Lens. The transaction, which occurred about six hours ago, involved three separate tokens: 2,466 Uniswap (UNI) valued at $8,410, 152,925 Cronos (CRO) worth $10,689, and 1,589 Chainlink (LINK) valued at $15,703. Origin of the Seized Assets The funds were originally confiscated from Brian Krewson, a convicted criminal currently serving a prison sentence for aiding money laundering in connection with drug trafficking offenses. The seizure and subsequent deposit into a government wallet mark a routine step in the U.S. government’s process of managing and liquidating forfeited digital assets. The transfer to Coinbase Prime, a platform commonly used by institutional clients, suggests the government may be preparing to auction or otherwise convert these holdings into fiat currency. Government Crypto Seizures: A Growing Trend The U.S. government has increasingly become a significant holder of cryptocurrency through seizures related to criminal investigations. Agencies such as the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the IRS regularly confiscate digital assets from illicit activities, including drug trafficking, ransomware attacks, and fraud schemes. These assets are then stored in government-controlled wallets before being auctioned off in bulk sales or transferred to exchanges for liquidation. The process is designed to maximize value for the government while ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. Implications for the Market and Investors While the amount in this particular deposit is relatively small, the movement of seized assets by government entities can sometimes create short-term market pressure, particularly if large volumes are liquidated at once. However, in this case, the total value of approximately $33,000 is unlikely to have a significant impact on the prices of UNI, CRO, or LINK. For investors and market observers, the more notable aspect is the continued transparency and operational consistency of the U.S. government’s approach to handling seized digital assets. Conclusion The deposit of seized UNI, CRO, and LINK into Coinbase Prime represents a standard procedure in the U.S. government’s management of forfeited cryptocurrency. The assets, linked to the criminal activities of Brian Krewson, are now in the hands of a regulated institutional platform, likely preceding a formal liquidation process. While the transaction itself is not market-moving, it underscores the government’s ongoing role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem and its commitment to converting illicit gains into lawful proceeds. FAQs Q1: Why did the U.S. government deposit these cryptocurrencies into Coinbase Prime? A1: The deposit is part of the standard process for managing and liquidating seized digital assets. Coinbase Prime is an institutional platform that allows the government to securely hold and eventually sell these assets, converting them into fiat currency. Q2: Who is Brian Krewson, and why were his assets seized? A2: Brian Krewson is a convicted criminal serving a prison sentence for aiding money laundering related to drug offenses. His cryptocurrency holdings were seized by the U.S. government as part of the forfeiture process following his conviction. Q3: Will this deposit affect the market prices of UNI, CRO, or LINK? A3: The total value of the deposit is approximately $33,000, which is relatively small compared to the daily trading volumes of these tokens. Therefore, it is unlikely to have a noticeable impact on their market prices. This post US Government Moves $33K in Seized UNI, CRO, and LINK to Coinbase Prime first appeared on BitcoinWorld .