Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%


PRICE
+14.13%
$0.7693

PRICE
+8.19%
$3.23

PRICE
+6.25%
$0.09093

PRICE
+3.79%
$0.05871

PRICE
+3.05%
$0.8096

PRICE
+2.85%
$0.09658

PRICE
+2.19%
$0.06102

PRICE
+2.16%
$0.6521

PRICE
+2.08%
$0.2246

PRICE
+2.04%
$7.28

PRICE
+1.85%
$0.8272

PRICE
+1.81%
$1.92

PRICE
+1.75%
$0.08864

PRICE
+1.51%
$2.43

PRICE
+1.27%
$339.68

PRICE
+1.12%
$0.01402

PRICE
+1.06%
$0.3208

PRICE
+1.03%
$1.02

PRICE
+0.96%
$0.1926

PRICE
+0.95%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.82%
$0.1642

PRICE
+0.80%
$45.22

PRICE
+0.69%
$1.04

PRICE
+0.68%
$6.85

PRICE
+0.63%
$2.01
VOL24
+752.26%
$0.008568

VOL24
+622.55%
$1.0000

VOL24
+512.1%
$1.14

VOL24
+268.3%
$4,321.71

VOL24
+239.88%
$0.052

VOL24
+234.34%
$0.9992

VOL24
+93.62%
$3.22

VOL24
+67.61%
$0.9997

VOL24
+66.79%
$1.04

VOL24
+57.12%
$0.03141

VOL24
+50.42%
$0.03375

VOL24
+18.07%
$0.9993

VOL24
+8.36%
$0.07696

VOL24
+6.26%
$0.01402

VOL24
+6.14%
$0.8094

VOL24
+4.46%
$1.0000

VOL24
+3.35%
$254.3

VOL24
+2.05%
$9.66

VOL24
+1.71%
$0.9995

VOL24
+0%
$1.22

VOL24
+0%
$11.12

VOL24
+0%
$1.12

VOL24
+0%
$115.59

VOL24
+0%
$1.13

PRICE
+14.13%
$0.7693

PRICE
+8.19%
$3.23

PRICE
+6.25%
$0.09093

PRICE
+3.79%
$0.05871

PRICE
+3.05%
$0.8096

PRICE
+2.85%
$0.09658

PRICE
+2.19%
$0.06102

PRICE
+2.16%
$0.6521

PRICE
+2.08%
$0.2246

PRICE
+2.04%
$7.28

PRICE
+1.85%
$0.8272

PRICE
+1.81%
$1.92

PRICE
+1.75%
$0.08864

PRICE
+1.51%
$2.43

PRICE
+1.27%
$339.68

PRICE
+1.12%
$0.01402

PRICE
+1.06%
$0.3208

PRICE
+1.03%
$1.02

PRICE
+0.96%
$0.1926

PRICE
+0.95%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.82%
$0.1642

PRICE
+0.80%
$45.22

PRICE
+0.69%
$1.04

PRICE
+0.68%
$6.85

PRICE
+0.63%
$2.01
VOL24
+752.26%
$0.008568

VOL24
+622.55%
$1.0000

VOL24
+512.1%
$1.14

VOL24
+268.3%
$4,321.71

VOL24
+239.88%
$0.052

VOL24
+234.34%
$0.9992

VOL24
+93.62%
$3.22

VOL24
+67.61%
$0.9997

VOL24
+66.79%
$1.04

VOL24
+57.12%
$0.03141

VOL24
+50.42%
$0.03375

VOL24
+18.07%
$0.9993

VOL24
+8.36%
$0.07696

VOL24
+6.26%
$0.01402

VOL24
+6.14%
$0.8094

VOL24
+4.46%
$1.0000

VOL24
+3.35%
$254.3

VOL24
+2.05%
$9.66

VOL24
+1.71%
$0.9995

VOL24
+0%
$1.22

VOL24
+0%
$11.12

VOL24
+0%
$1.12

VOL24
+0%
$115.59

VOL24
+0%
$1.13
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$0.01154
#188
$193,307,783
$0.00
9,218,641,411
21,000,000,000
5 Jun 2026, 07:29

Privacy on public blockchains is shifting from add-on mixers to native token standards. Starknet’s STRK20 proposes shielded balances and private transfers for fungible assets, while Robinhood’s addition of STRK has pulled fresh attention to this mid-cap L2. The practical question: does STRK20 change the calculus for users, builders, and allocators — and if so, how do you position without overreaching on risk? In May, the first STRK20 asset, strkBTC, went live on mainnet, signaling that privacy features are moving from whitepapers to production. With a major retail venue now listing STRK, the on-chain incentives around liquidity, UX, and compliance will be tested in the open. This article breaks down how STRK20 works, what’s actually live, how to navigate early opportunities, and which red flags matter most. AspectWhat to KnowMarket catalystRobinhood added STRK spot trading, spotlighting Starknet to retail audiences ( CoinNess ).New standardSTRK20 enables shielded balances and private transfers for ERC‑20–style tokens on Starknet.What’s livestrkBTC, the first STRK20 asset, launched on mainnet on May 12, 2026 ( Starknet ).Liquidity contextStarknet TVL sits around $189.7M as of June 5, 2026 snapshot ( DeFiLlama ).Market-cap lensSTRK’s market cap has been in the mid-to-high hundreds of millions; one page showed ~$256M on May 25, 2026 ( Invezz ).Who benefits firstOTC desks, treasuries, market makers, and DeFi protocols needing selective privacy and auditability.Key risksRegulatory optics, liquidity fragmentation, UX missteps (viewing keys), smart‑contract bugs. How STRK20 Privacy Works on Starknet STRK20 is a token framework on Starknet designed to give fungible assets the option to live in a shielded state. Instead of broadcasting balances and transfers on a public ledger, users interact with a pool that commits to balances privately. Transfers generate zero-knowledge proofs attesting to validity (e.g., sufficient balance, no double spend) without revealing amounts, addresses, or linkage. The core idea mirrors privacy coins and prior L2 experiments but applies at the token-standard layer, allowing any compatible asset to toggle privacy features. That design can support use cases such as payroll, OTC settlement, or strategy execution where timing and amounts are sensitive, while still enabling selective disclosure for audits or compliance. Crucially, STRK20 does not eliminate risk. Shielded designs can leak metadata through fees, timing, or liquidity edges if users are careless. The strength of privacy depends on wallet support, relayer behavior, and the size of the anonymity set. As always, smart‑contract risk remains. The first real test is strkBTC on mainnet — a private Bitcoin-denominated asset using STRK20. Its arrival shows that developers can ship products with shielded flows today, not just prototype them ( Starknet ). Glossary: key terms you’ll see STRK20 — A Starknet token framework enabling shielded balances and private transfers for fungible assets. Shielded Pool — A contract that holds commitments to balances; transactions update state privately with zk proofs. Viewing Key — A key or permission mechanism to reveal your private balance/flows to auditors, partners, or yourself across devices. Relayer — A service that submits proofs/transactions to the network and can pay fees to reduce on-chain linkage. Commitment/Nullifier — Cryptographic notes and spent markers used to prevent double spending in private systems. Anonymity Set — The set of potential senders a transfer could be; larger sets generally improve privacy. Step-by-Step Playbook Validate the live stack — Confirm what’s deployed (e.g., strkBTC) and read the specific docs before touching funds. Production status matters more than roadmap slides. Choose a wallet with viewing‑key support — If the STRK20 asset uses viewing keys, ensure your wallet handles key export/backup and lets you selectively disclose when needed. Bridge and fund prudently — Move small test amounts of STRK and any intended assets to Starknet first. Treat this as experimental capital until you build confidence. Practice shielded transfers — Run a few tiny transfers to understand how relayers, fees, and confirmations work. Check if your wallet leaks metadata (memo fields, timestamps). Map liquidity paths — Identify which venues support STRK20 assets (AMMs, OTC desks). If liquidity is thin, plan for slippage and avoid telegraphing larger orders. Set a disclosure policy — Decide when and how you will reveal flows (to a counterparty, auditor, or custodian). Store viewing keys safely and test revocation where available. Monitor chain health and TVL — Track Starknet’s TVL, active addresses, and growth of the STRK20 anonymity set. Lower activity reduces privacy and execution quality. What Changes With STRK20 Versus Existing Privacy Approaches Privacy on Ethereum-adjacent rails has largely been either protocol-native (e.g., Zcash) or application-layer (mixers, stealth-address wallets). STRK20 pushes privacy into the token standard on a performant L2, where multiple fungible assets can share a shielded pool architecture and UX conventions. That can simplify integrations for wallets and DeFi apps compared to bespoke per-app privacy solutions. The model also introduces selective transparency via viewing keys and attestations, allowing businesses to meet audit or compliance obligations without fully publicizing flows. The trade-off is operational: users must manage extra key material, and developers must design interfaces that minimize foot‑guns. FeatureSTRK20 (Starknet)SNIP‑20 (Secret Network)Zcash (ZEC)ScopePrivacy-enabled fungible token standard on an Ethereum L2Privacy token standard on a separate L1Protocol‑native privacy coinPrivacy mechanismZero‑knowledge proofs (zk‑STARKs via Starknet)Encrypted state with viewing keysZero‑knowledge proofs (zk‑SNARKs)Selective disclosureViewing keys/attestations per assetViewing keys per address/assetViewing keys for shielded addressesEVM/L2 proximityClose to Ethereum UX/liquidity via L2Separate ecosystem bridgesSeparate ecosystem bridgesTypical UX risksKey management, relayer assumptionsKey backup/restore, app integrationsAddress type confusion (t/e/s), memo handling Pro tip: Treat privacy tokens like margin tools — powerful, but compounding small mistakes. Rehearse with trivial sums before deploying size. Liquidity, Compliance, and the Robinhood Effect Exposure on a major retail platform can change the conversation around a network’s roadmap. On June 4, 2026, coverage noted that Robinhood added STRK spot trading, lifting Starknet’s profile beyond crypto‑native venues ( CoinNess ). Listings don’t directly create on-chain liquidity, but they can expand the holder base, improve fiat ramps, and attract developers seeking larger audiences. For STRK20, more holders potentially means more wallets supporting privacy features, larger anonymity sets, and a better chance of liquid markets for shielded assets like strkBTC. That said, liquidity remains modest at the ecosystem level: Starknet’s TVL hovered near $189.7M around early June 2026 ( DeFiLlama ). Thin TVL can translate into slippage, limited collateral options, and smaller anonymity sets early on. Compliance is the other half. STRK20’s selective disclosure helps institutions manage audits, but jurisdictional views on privacy tech differ and can change quickly. Teams should assume that documentation, KYC at ramps, and clear policies around viewing key sharing are table stakes for institutional adoption. Where STRK20 Could Gain Traction First Private balances make the most sense where timing and size telegraph edge. Expect early traction in OTC settlements, treasury rebalancing, market‑making inventories, and cross‑border payroll . These workflows need verifiable receipts without revealing counterparties or strategies in real time. The launch of strkBTC on mainnet is a practical building block. It gives desks a BTC‑denominated rail with privacy on Starknet, useful for hedging flows or settling trades without broadcasting sizes ( Starknet ). If AMMs or lending markets adopt STRK20 assets as collateral with careful oracles, structured‑product strategies could follow. Market-cap context matters. STRK sits in the mid-cap range; snapshots have shown valuations in the hundreds of millions (e.g., ~$256M in late May 2026) ( Invezz ). In that band, narratives can move quickly — both up and down — on relatively small capital inflows. It’s important to separate distribution headlines from on-chain adoption metrics. Pitfalls & Red Flags Small anonymity sets — Early usage can be sparse. Low transaction variety makes it easier to correlate flows by time, amount ranges, or fees. Viewing key mismanagement — Lost or leaked viewing keys undermine privacy and, in some designs, long-term auditability. Back up securely and test read‑only access. Relayer trust assumptions — If a relayer clusters your sessions or logs IPs, it can create off‑chain linkages. Prefer relayers with clear policies and rotate when feasible. Liquidity mirage — Headline listings don’t guarantee deep on-chain books. Check pool depth, on-chain spreads, and withdrawal throughput before sizing positions. Smart‑contract and bridge risk — STRK20 assets still rely on contracts and, in some cases, bridges. Audit status and bug bounties matter; diversify custody. Regulatory whiplash — Privacy tooling sits in a sensitive area. Stay current on local guidance and avoid assuming cross‑border norms will align. For context on ecosystem health, keep an eye on Starknet’s TVL and app activity; the chain’s TVL was roughly $189.7M on June 5, 2026 ( DeFiLlama ). Pair that with exchange listing developments like Robinhood’s STRK support to form a fuller picture of traction ( CoinNess ). If you want more long-form coverage and interviews with builders pushing privacy standards, visit Crypto Daily . Frequently Asked Questions What exactly is STRK20? STRK20 is a Starknet token framework that lets fungible tokens hold balances in a shielded pool and execute private transfers using zero‑knowledge proofs. It aims to deliver selective privacy at the token-standard level rather than relying only on mixers or standalone privacy coins. Is anything live beyond docs? Yes. strkBTC — a Bitcoin‑denominated asset using the STRK20 privacy framework — went live on mainnet on May 12, 2026, demonstrating real deployment of shielded transfers on Starknet ( Starknet ). Does Robinhood listing STRK change STRK20 adoption? Indirectly. The listing increases visibility and may grow the user base that funds wallets and tries Starknet apps, but on-chain adoption depends on wallet support, protocol integrations, and liquidity. Treat listings as distribution catalysts, not guarantees of usage ( CoinNess ). How do viewing keys and audits work? Many privacy token designs use viewing keys to allow read‑only access for the holder, auditors, or counterparties. You generate and back up a viewing key, then share it selectively. Policies vary by asset, so confirm how keys are created, rotated, and revoked before transacting. What metrics indicate real traction? Watch Starknet TVL, unique addresses interacting with STRK20 assets, relayer throughput, and depth on venues listing STRK20 pairs. For chain health, third‑party dashboards have shown TVL near $189.7M in early June 2026 ( DeFiLlama ). Where does strkBTC fit in a portfolio or workflow? It can serve as a private BTC‑denominated rail on Starknet for hedging, settlement, or treasury moves without broadcasting sizes. As with any new primitive, start small, evaluate liquidity, and confirm integration paths with your custody and accounting stack. Is STRK a large-cap or mid-cap play right now? Snapshots place STRK in the mid-cap range; one data page showed a market capitalization around $256M as of late May 2026. Market caps fluctuate and should be checked in real time before making decisions ( Invezz ). Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
3 Jun 2026, 12:03

Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has warned Premier League clubs to stop making sponsorship deals with unauthorized crypto firms and trading platforms risk exposing both fans and clubs to financial harm . The regulator insisted that Premier League clubs that sign sponsorship deals with crypto firms and trading platforms that are not allowed to operate in the UK are misusing the trust of millions of fans. Do Premier League teams sign deals with unauthorized companies? Top-flight football runs on cash and sponsorship deals have become the biggest source of income for many clubs. So for many of them, saying no to a big check is very hard. Manchester City, the former Premier League champions, earned a massive €408 million ($475 million) from commercial and sponsorship deals in 2025, more money than the €332 million the club got from selling TV rights. While no individual companies were named in its warning, OKX, one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges and a Manchester City sponsor, is not registered with the FCA and agreed to pay over $500 million for violating U.S. anti-money laundering laws. Lucy Castledine, the FCA’s director of consumer investments said through these partnerships, football clubs allow unauthorized financial firms to exploit the loyalty of millions of fans by putting “potentially dodgy products” in front of them. UK football clubs are now expected to run proper due diligence on financial services sponsors before signing, and to continue those checks on an ongoing basis. The FCA also confirmed it is coordinating with the UK government, the Premier League, and the Independent Football Regulator to address the issue across the sport. What happens if clubs ignore the FCA’s warning? The FCA included in its statement that clubs that go ahead with partnerships with unauthorized firms will be potentially exposed to “legal liability, money laundering risks and serious reputational damage.” Some clubs have already been contacted regarding existing partnerships. The FCA’s actions are prompted by a number of previous incidents in which unauthorized sponsorships ended badly. For instance, FC Barcelona confirmed a partnership with a Samoa-registered firm Zero-Knowledge Proof back in November 2025, describing it as a data privacy project. Within days, ZKP began promoting a token sale. Barcelona was forced to issue a late-night statement insisting it had “no connection whatsoever” to the token and that no token activity was included in the sponsorship agreement. The former Barcelona director Xavier Vilajoana publicly asked the club to explain how it vetted the deal. In a separate case, FTX had signed a 19-year, $135 million naming rights deal with Miami-Dade County for the arena housing the NBA’s Miami Heat, a $210 million partnership with esports organization TSM, and sponsorship agreements with Formula 1 team Mercedes-AMG Petronas, according to Stinson LLP . All three partners ended up in bankruptcy court seeking to exit their contracts. In cycling, professional women’s team Canyon//SRAM terminated its partnership with the embattled cryptocurrency exchange Zondacrypto on June 2, citing alleged breaches of contract. The team is now removing all sponsor branding from its equipment, clothing, and digital platforms. The FCA has urged supporters to check any financial services firm on its online Firm Checker tool before using their products. Any firm providing financial services that does not appear on the register is not regulated, and consumers will have no regulatory protection if something goes wrong. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .
30 May 2026, 13:42

🚨 Blockchain payments are exposing corporate data, sparking privacy concerns. Zero-knowledge proof (ZK) technology can help shield sensitive details in $ETH transactions. 🕵️♂️ Critical data: AI-driven payments will boost on-chain privacy needs even further. Continue Reading: Corporate blockchain payments face privacy risk as ZK tech grows The post Corporate blockchain payments face privacy risk as ZK tech grows appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
28 May 2026, 20:55

Vitalik Buterin has tied DeepSeek V4 to Ethereum’s privacy future, outlining a roadmap integrating local AI models into Ethereum’s access layer. The Ethereum co-founder specifically notes significant overlap between CROPS’ Ethereum Access Layer and CROPS AI. Buterin introduced the CROPS AI (Censorship-Resistant, Open-Source, Private, and Secure AI) concept at the ETH Mumbai conference on March 12, discussing reasons why AI could become the next major security risk for crypto. He argued that AI is becoming powerful enough to manage wallets and interact with blockchains, but noted that the current ecosystem is not designed with privacy and security in mind. Buterin believes that if AI agents are going to control crypto, they must be built very differently. He says this reflects how far AI models have come. According to Buterin, most people assume that AI models running locally on their devices are private. However, he emphasizes that this assumption is wrong. The Ethereum boss references the current state of local AI tools like the Qwen 3.5 series, locally running agent frameworks, and a growing stack of open-source software. He points out that while these models may appear independent on the surface, most of them make calls to OpenAI or Anthropic’s APIs whenever they need to perform a task they cannot handle on their own. Buterin says DeepSeek V4 is vital to realizing local private transactions Updating on the progress of the CROPS AI project he has been following, Buterin says that DeepSeek V4 (with a 2-bit quantized version running on 90GB of memory) is vital to realizing private, locally processed transactions. He notes that the CROPS Ethereum access layer overlaps with CROPS AI, including ZK-based paid remote LLM calls and private Ethereum RPC reads. He calls for more Ethereum-tuned AI models to improve the security of smart contracts and protocol code. “One other thing that has been on my mind is that there’s actually a lot of intersection between “CROPS Ethereum access layer” and “CROPS AI”. For example, we want a ZK way to make (paid) calls to remote LLMs. But if we have this, then it’s just as useful for solving another problem: private RPC reads in Ethereum.” – Vitalik Buterin , Co-founder of Ethereum The Ethereum co-founder points out that the connection between DeepSeek V4 and Ethereum’s privacy goals centers on the CROPS AI concept. He notes that users can query Ethereum data by using local models like DeepSeek V4 without revealing their metadata, IP addresses, or wallet balances to centralized RPC providers. DeepSeek V4’s ability to run on self-hosted local setups ensures that users rely on self-sovereign infrastructure rather than corporate cloud servers. Buterin suggests combining private local LLM calls with Ethereum ZK payments Buterin suggests combining private local LLM calls with Ethereum ZK proofs, allowing users to privately process their blockchain interactions off-chain. He says this helps in hiding on-chain transaction links, noting that DeepSeek V4’s low hardware requirements are key to this. However, DeepSeek V4’s 2-bit-quantized version can also run on high-end consumer workstations. Buterin further notes that the newly released DeepSeek V4 serves as the primary proof-point that this vision is hardware-viable today, not years away. Users running DeepSeek V4 locally can create a “cryptographic sanctuary” where their financial intentions never leave their physical machines until they are ready to be added to the public ledger. Regarding the next steps, Buterin urges users to watch out for DeepSeek V4 Flash optimization patches for AMD, which he cites as a key area of improvement. He also reminds users to ensure their hardware has at least 96GB-128GB of Unified Memory (for Mac) or VRAM (for PC) to handle the 90GB of quantization overhead. The push ties into a broader “Cypherpunk” revival in which AI acts as a fiduciary for users. Buterin emphasizes that this effectively mixes the requests, decoupling payments from users’ identities and rendering remote AI computations anonymous. Buterin also references warnings from the cybersecurity community, noting that a locally running AI might ping OpenAI’s servers when it gets confused. He notes that the mainstream open-source AI ecosystem does not care about the distinction, adding that most of these systems are optimized for capability rather than security. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .