Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%

PRICE
+8.33%
$0.01143

PRICE
+7.74%
$0.7549

PRICE
+7.73%
$0.00001001

PRICE
+5.93%
$287.56

PRICE
+5.79%
$0.2832

PRICE
+5.22%
$0.2093

PRICE
+4.6%
$1.81

PRICE
+4.34%
$0.6847

PRICE
+3.68%
$0.2441

PRICE
+2.87%
$0.1119

PRICE
+2.72%
$1.24
PRICE
+2.65%
$0.03359

PRICE
+2.07%
$0.09759

PRICE
+1.94%
$3.27

PRICE
+1.93%
$0.9390

PRICE
+1.83%
$385.21

PRICE
+1.81%
$1.35

PRICE
+1.78%
$2.37

PRICE
+1.63%
$1.01

PRICE
+1.49%
$2,326.23

PRICE
+1.48%
$0.2514

PRICE
+1.47%
$2.52

PRICE
+1.4%
$93.44

PRICE
+1.39%
$9.26

PRICE
+1.39%
$0.007382

VOL24
+204.76%
$1.14

VOL24
+98.39%
$0.1479

VOL24
+41.04%
$0.2832

VOL24
+23.58%
$0.3307

VOL24
+23.45%
$0.1119
VOL24
+21.84%
$0.007563

VOL24
+14.92%
$3.05

VOL24
+12.41%
$10.24

VOL24
+9.01%
$0.05577

VOL24
+6.03%
$0.08488

VOL24
+3.4%
$8.46

VOL24
+2.61%
$386.5

VOL24
+2.03%
$2.37
VOL24
+1.11%
$1.99

VOL24
+0%
$1.13

VOL24
+0%
$11.07

VOL24
+0%
$1.23

VOL24
+0%
$1.11

VOL24
+0%
$115.1
PRICE
+8.33%
$0.01143

PRICE
+7.74%
$0.7549

PRICE
+7.73%
$0.00001001

PRICE
+5.93%
$287.56

PRICE
+5.79%
$0.2832

PRICE
+5.22%
$0.2093

PRICE
+4.6%
$1.81

PRICE
+4.34%
$0.6847

PRICE
+3.68%
$0.2441

PRICE
+2.87%
$0.1119

PRICE
+2.72%
$1.24
PRICE
+2.65%
$0.03359

PRICE
+2.07%
$0.09759

PRICE
+1.94%
$3.27

PRICE
+1.93%
$0.9390

PRICE
+1.83%
$385.21

PRICE
+1.81%
$1.35

PRICE
+1.78%
$2.37

PRICE
+1.63%
$1.01

PRICE
+1.49%
$2,326.23

PRICE
+1.48%
$0.2514

PRICE
+1.47%
$2.52

PRICE
+1.4%
$93.44

PRICE
+1.39%
$9.26

PRICE
+1.39%
$0.007382

VOL24
+204.76%
$1.14

VOL24
+98.39%
$0.1479

VOL24
+41.04%
$0.2832

VOL24
+23.58%
$0.3307

VOL24
+23.45%
$0.1119
VOL24
+21.84%
$0.007563

VOL24
+14.92%
$3.05

VOL24
+12.41%
$10.24

VOL24
+9.01%
$0.05577

VOL24
+6.03%
$0.08488

VOL24
+3.4%
$8.46

VOL24
+2.61%
$386.5

VOL24
+2.03%
$2.37
VOL24
+1.11%
$1.99

VOL24
+0%
$1.13

VOL24
+0%
$11.07

VOL24
+0%
$1.23

VOL24
+0%
$1.11

VOL24
+0%
$115.1
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$2.16
#246
$123,614,617
$69,340,102
65,652,466
65,652,466

Rank #17
$9.09
-0.73%

Rank #83
$0.9194
-0.93%

Rank #223
$0.1465
+2.55%

Rank #295
$0.01133
+0.18%

Rank #449
$0.0009350
-0.19%

Rank #724
$0.3953
+0.05%

Rank #794
$0.06509
-0.67%

Rank #1014
$0.09662
-0.33%
Rank #1660
$0.05121
+0.42%
Rank #2179
$6.54
+0.10%

Rank #14405
$0.05063
+0%
Welcome to the future of data storage A new data storage blockchain protocol based on a novel proof of access consensus mechanism that creates truly permanent data storage for the first time. Now data is finally permanent, low-cost, and truly censorship free. Arweave has solved the millennia old problem of decentralised data availability. Pay Once, Store Forever. Arweave makes permanent data storage a reality for the very first time. As the $3 trillion data-storage industry is growing, the need for cheap, distributed, permanent data-storage on the blockchain has become an urgent necessity.
1 May 2026, 13:48

AR is holding above EMA20 at 1.93 dollars, primary support at 1.9158 is the critical buyer zone. Resistance at 1.9593 is being tested, a breakout could lead to 2.0667.
30 Apr 2026, 00:20

BitcoinWorld Meta Reality Labs losses: $83.5 billion burned on AR/VR as AI spending surges Meta Platforms reported a net loss of $4 billion from its Reality Labs division in the first quarter of 2025. This marks the 21st consecutive quarter of significant losses for the unit responsible for augmented reality glasses, virtual reality headsets, and related software. The company has now lost a total of $83.5 billion on Reality Labs since early 2021, averaging roughly $4 billion per quarter. While Meta’s overall financial performance remains strong, its persistent spending on AR/VR technology continues to draw investor scrutiny, especially as the company pivots toward even larger investments in artificial intelligence. Meta Reality Labs losses: A consistent pattern The latest earnings report, released on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, from Meta’s headquarters in Menlo Park, California, confirms a now-familiar trend. Reality Labs lost $4 billion in the first quarter of 2025. This figure is not an anomaly. It aligns with the average quarterly loss the division has recorded over the past five years. Since 2021, Meta has funneled tens of billions of dollars into developing AR glasses, VR headsets like the Quest series, and the Horizon Worlds platform. The division has yet to generate a profit. Analysts point out that the scale of these losses is unprecedented in the consumer electronics sector. For comparison, Apple’s entire services division generates over $20 billion in profit per quarter. Meta’s Reality Labs, by contrast, has consumed over $80 billion without producing a clear return. The company justifies these expenditures as long-term bets on next-generation computing platforms. However, the market has not responded positively to the sustained cash burn. Meta AR VR spending: The metaverse bet The core of Meta’s Reality Labs spending revolves around its metaverse ambitions. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has described the metaverse as the successor to the mobile internet. To realize this vision, Meta has invested heavily in hardware, software, and content creation. The Quest 3 headset, released in late 2023, received positive reviews but has not achieved mass-market adoption. Sales figures remain modest compared to gaming consoles or smartphones. Meta also spends billions on research and development for advanced AR glasses. The company has shown prototypes of lightweight, all-day wearable glasses, but a consumer-ready product remains years away. Meanwhile, competitors like Apple have entered the market with the Vision Pro, a high-end mixed-reality headset that has also struggled to gain traction due to its $3,500 price tag. The entire AR/VR market has grown slower than many industry experts predicted. Reality Labs cumulative losses (2021–2025): $83.5 billion Average quarterly loss: $4 billion Key products: Quest headsets, Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses, Horizon Worlds Market adoption: Slow, with limited mainstream appeal Meta AI investment: A new spending frontier As Meta pulls back from some metaverse projects, it is ramping up spending on artificial intelligence. The company projects capital expenditures between $125 billion and $145 billion in 2026. This figure exceeds both analyst estimates and Meta’s own previous guidance. The bulk of this spending will go toward AI infrastructure, including data centers, specialized chips, and research talent. Meta has been hiring aggressively in the AI space. Over the past year, the company poached more than 50 AI researchers and engineers from competitors like Google and OpenAI. This hiring spree helped Meta ship its latest AI model, Muse Spark, earlier in April 2025. Zuckerberg reported on the earnings call that usage of Meta AI has seen “large increases” since the model’s release. However, building and maintaining cutting-edge AI systems is expensive. The company’s CFO, Susan Li, acknowledged the difficulty of forecasting future costs. During the earnings call, she stated, “Our experience so far has been that we have continued to underestimate our compute needs.” This comment underscores the uncertainty surrounding Meta’s AI spending trajectory. Unlike its AR/VR investments, which have yet to generate meaningful revenue, Meta’s AI tools are already being integrated into its core advertising business, which remains its primary profit driver. Investor concerns about Meta’s financial strategy Despite Meta’s strong quarterly results, investors reacted negatively to the news. The company reported net income of $26.8 billion for Q1 2025, up 61% year-over-year. Revenue also rose 33% to $56.3 billion. These figures demonstrate that Meta’s core social media business remains highly profitable. Yet the stock fell more than 5% in after-hours trading following the earnings release. One investor on the earnings call asked directly about Meta’s 2027 capital expenditure outlook. Li declined to provide a specific number, citing the dynamic nature of the planning process. This lack of clarity contributed to investor unease. Many market participants worry that Meta’s AI spending could mirror the pattern of its Reality Labs investments—large upfront costs with uncertain returns. Meta’s dual-track strategy of funding both AR/VR and AI simultaneously creates a unique financial burden. Few technology companies have attempted to invest heavily in two unproven, capital-intensive fields at the same time. Alphabet, for example, has its own AI investments through DeepMind and Google Cloud, but its AR/VR efforts through Google Glass and Daydream have been scaled back significantly. Meta quarterly earnings 2025: Strong revenue, cautious outlook The Q1 2025 earnings report shows a company that is financially healthy but strategically stretched. Revenue growth of 33% was driven primarily by advertising, which remains Meta’s dominant income source. The company’s user base also continued to grow, with daily active users across its family of apps reaching 3.5 billion. These numbers provide a strong foundation for future investments. However, the earnings call revealed a tension between short-term profitability and long-term ambition. Zuckerberg emphasized the need to stay competitive with AI leaders like OpenAI and Anthropic. He stated, “We are very focused on increasing the efficiency of our investments.” This language suggests that Meta is aware of investor concerns and is trying to balance its spending with operational discipline. Meta’s capital expenditure forecast for 2025 also increased, primarily due to higher component costs, particularly memory pricing. The company expects to spend more on data center hardware and networking equipment. These investments are necessary to train and deploy large-scale AI models, but they also compress margins in the near term. Meta metaverse losses: A cautionary tale The scale of Meta’s metaverse losses has become a case study in corporate risk-taking. The company rebranded from Facebook to Meta in October 2021, signaling a strategic shift toward the metaverse. Since then, it has spent over $80 billion on Reality Labs. For context, that amount is roughly equivalent to the entire market capitalization of companies like Uber or Airbnb. Despite this massive investment, the metaverse has not achieved mainstream adoption. Horizon Worlds, Meta’s flagship VR social platform, has struggled with low user engagement and technical issues. The company has reduced its ambitions for the platform, shifting focus toward more practical applications like virtual meetings and fitness. Meanwhile, the broader VR market remains niche, with global headset shipments declining in 2024. Industry experts note that Meta’s metaverse bet was made at a time when interest rates were low and technology stocks were booming. The macroeconomic environment has since changed. Higher interest rates have made investors more focused on profitability and cash flow. Meta’s continued losses on Reality Labs now appear less justifiable than they did during the pandemic-era tech boom. Conclusion Meta’s Reality Labs division has lost $83.5 billion since 2021, with average quarterly losses of $4 billion. The company’s AR/VR spending remains high, even as it pivots toward even larger investments in artificial intelligence. Meta projects capital expenditures of up to $145 billion in 2026, driven by AI infrastructure costs. While Meta’s core advertising business remains highly profitable, investor concerns about the sustainability of these investments have weighed on the stock. The company’s dual focus on both the metaverse and AI represents one of the most ambitious—and risky—capital allocation strategies in the technology sector. As Meta continues to burn cash on unproven technologies, the question remains whether these bets will eventually pay off or become a cautionary tale for future generations of tech leaders. FAQs Q1: How much money has Meta lost on Reality Labs? A1: Meta has lost a total of $83.5 billion on its Reality Labs division since 2021, with average quarterly losses of approximately $4 billion. Q2: Why is Meta spending so much on AR/VR if it’s losing money? A2: Meta views augmented reality and virtual reality as the next major computing platform after mobile. The company believes that long-term investment in hardware and software will eventually generate significant returns, similar to how early investments in smartphones paid off for Apple. Q3: How does Meta’s AI spending compare to its AR/VR spending? A3: Meta’s AI spending is projected to be much larger. The company expects capital expenditures of $125 billion to $145 billion in 2026, primarily for AI infrastructure. This is significantly higher than the roughly $16 billion per year it has been spending on Reality Labs. Q4: Did Meta’s stock price drop after the earnings report? A4: Yes, Meta’s stock fell more than 5% in after-hours trading following the Q1 2025 earnings release. Investors were concerned about the lack of clarity on future capital expenditures and the continued losses from Reality Labs. Q5: What is the outlook for Meta’s AR/VR products? A5: The outlook remains uncertain. Meta continues to develop AR glasses and VR headsets, but market adoption has been slow. The company has shifted some focus away from the metaverse toward AI, but it has not abandoned its hardware ambitions entirely. This post Meta Reality Labs losses: $83.5 billion burned on AR/VR as AI spending surges first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
24 Apr 2026, 09:46

As of mid-April 2026, the intersection of decentralized storage and machine learning has created a new power couple: Arweave and Bittensor . With the recent "Open Model Initiative" requiring permanent archiving of training datasets and the surge in decentralized inference requests, these two protocols are being positioned as the "AI Data + Network" stack. However, the charts suggest we are in a phase of cautious positioning. While AR is attempting to repair its long-term trend from a low base, TAO is currently digesting a massive run-up from earlier in the year. The question for the tape is whether they can cement this "default pair" status or if scalability and cost concerns will push users back toward centralized clouds. Arweave (AR): AI Data Vault Trying To Rebuild Source: tradingview Arweave is increasingly viewed as the "Permanent Hard Drive" for AI. Its focus on immutable storage for massive datasets and model weights has given it a mild bullish tilt. Technically, AR is showing signs of life, trading above its 30-day SMA ($1.81), though it has recently dipped just below its 7-day average. The Current Pulse: The trend is in "early repair." The MACD histogram (+0.0155) is positive, confirming that upside momentum is building. However, the 200-day SMA ($3.15) remains a heavy psychological and technical ceiling. Until AR can reclaim the $3.00 level, it remains a "value" play rather than a momentum leader. AR Near-Term Scenarios: Base Case (-20% to +30%): Continued accumulation between $1.60 and $2.50. As long as daily closes stay above the 30-day SMA, the recovery story is intact. Bullish Path: A push toward the $3.15–$3.50 zone. This would require a breakout above the 200-day average, likely triggered by a major AI lab announcing its dataset archiving on Arweave. Bearish Path: A re-test of the $1.40 lows if the "Permanent Storage" narrative loses steam to cheaper, ephemeral L2 storage solutions. Bittensor (TAO): AI Network Cooling After A Big Run Source: tradingview Bittensor is the "Intelligence Layer" of the stack, facilitating a marketplace for AI models and compute. After a parabolic run earlier in 2026, the token is currently in a cooldown and digestion phase. Unlike AR, TAO is currently trading below its 30-day and 200-day moving averages. The Current Pulse: Momentum is currently to the downside. The MACD histogram (−3.07) is negative, and the RSI-14 at 45 indicates a lack of near-term buying conviction. Price has found minor support above the 7-day average, but the medium-term trend is still correcting. TAO Near-Term Scenarios: Base Case (-25% to +35%): A wide sideways band between $200 and $290. TAO needs to reclaim the 200-day SMA ($277) to prove the current correction is over. Bullish Path: A recovery leg toward $320–$350. This would require the MACD to flip positive and a surge in live, paying workloads on the Bittensor subnets. Bearish Path: A deeper correction toward $180–$195 if macro risk-off sentiment drains the speculative premium from AI-infrastructure tokens. Conclusion: Default Pair or Scalability Fade? The technical data shows a divergence: AR is an early-stage recovery bet, while TAO is an established leader currently taking a breather. For them to be crowned the "uncontested" AI stack, both must reclaim and hold their 200-day moving averages simultaneously. If scalability concerns regarding cost-per-GB (for AR) or network congestion (for TAO) resurface, expect them to remain volatile range assets that pop on headlines but fail to sustain a trend. For now, they are high-beta satellites of the broader AI theme, with AR offering a "repair" entry and TAO waiting for a momentum reset. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
12 Apr 2026, 20:10

BitcoinWorld Apple Smart Glasses: Four Competing Designs Revealed in Crucial Testing Phase Apple is actively testing four distinct physical designs for its long-anticipated smart glasses, according to a new report from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. This development signals a crucial phase in the product’s journey toward a potential 2027 consumer launch. The tech giant’s exploration of multiple form factors underscores a strategic pivot toward a more accessible wearable, moving beyond the high-end, immersive vision of its existing Vision Pro headset. Apple Smart Glasses Design Philosophy and Four Prototypes Bloomberg’s report, citing sources familiar with the project, details the four frame styles currently under evaluation. This testing phase is critical for determining market fit and user comfort. The designs represent a spectrum of aesthetics, potentially targeting different user preferences and demographics. The four reported frame designs are: Large Rectangular Frame: A bold, statement design offering a larger surface area. Slimmer Rectangular Frame: A more subtle, classic style reportedly similar to glasses often worn by Apple CEO Tim Cook. Larger Oval/Circular Frame: A retro-inspired or modern round look with significant lens presence. Smaller Oval/Circular Frame: A compact, minimalist version of the circular design. Furthermore, Apple is considering a range of colors including black, ocean blue, and light brown. This focus on varied aesthetics marks a significant departure from the one-size-fits-all approach of many first-generation tech products. The company may ultimately launch with multiple designs, a strategy common in eyewear but less so in first-generation Apple hardware. Strategic Shift in Apple’s Wearable Roadmap This new product direction represents a notable recalibration of Apple’s augmented reality ambitions. Initially, the company reportedly envisioned a suite of mixed and augmented reality devices. However, that ambitious plan encountered hurdles, including product delays and the niche, high-cost positioning of the Vision Pro headset. Consequently, the reported smart glasses project appears more pragmatic. Analysts suggest this reflects a strategic learning curve. The device is described as functionally closer to Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses than a full AR headset. This indicates a focus on everyday wearability and core smart features over immersive 3D environments. Feature Apple Smart Glasses (Reported) Apple Vision Pro Meta Ray-Ban Smart Glasses Primary Interface Voice (Siri), Touch Hands, Eyes, Voice Voice (Meta AI), Touch Displays None Dual Micro-OLED None Key Functions Photos, Music, Calls, AI Full Spatial Computing Photos, Music, Calls, AI Target Use Case All-day Wearable Seated/Stationary Experiences All-day Wearable Expert Analysis on the Market Positioning Industry observers note this shift aligns with broader wearable trends. The failure of early, bulky smart glasses taught the industry that social acceptance is paramount. Therefore, Apple’s reported design focus on familiar eyeglass forms is a logical step. It prioritizes discretion and fashion to encourage all-day use, which is essential for collecting contextual data and enabling seamless AI assistance. This approach also mitigates technical challenges. By omitting complex displays, Apple can potentially improve battery life, reduce heat, and create a lighter, more comfortable product. The core value then shifts to the integration of cameras, audio, sensors, and, most importantly, artificial intelligence. The Central Role of AI and Siri The reported functionality hinges on a significant upgrade to Siri. The glasses are expected to allow users to take photos and videos using oval camera lenses, answer phone calls, play music, and interact primarily through voice. This positions the device as a physical gateway to Apple’s on-device and cloud AI ecosystem. A powerful, context-aware Siri would be necessary to make a screenless device intuitive. For instance, the AI would need to identify objects, translate text in real-time, or provide audio-based navigation without visual prompts. This development is therefore intrinsically linked to Apple’s broader AI advancements expected to be showcased at WWDC 2025 and beyond. The success of the glasses may depend less on hardware specs and more on the reliability and usefulness of its AI assistant. This creates a high-stakes software challenge for Apple’s engineering teams. Timeline and Industry Impact Mark Gurman’s report suggests a possible unveiling at the end of 2026, with a sales launch following in 2027. This timeline allows Apple to refine the designs, finalize the AI software stack, and build manufacturing capacity. The entry of Apple into the everyday smart glasses segment would significantly validate the category. It could accelerate competition, drive innovation in component miniaturization, and establish new design standards. However, it also raises familiar questions about privacy, data collection, and the social implications of always-on wearable cameras. Apple will need to address these concerns transparently. The company’s historical emphasis on privacy could become a key marketing differentiator against competitors in the smart glasses space. Conclusion Apple’s testing of four distinct designs for its upcoming smart glasses reveals a deliberate and user-focused development strategy. This move signifies a pragmatic evolution from the company’s initial AR ambitions, targeting a broader market with a familiar, wearable form factor. The project’s success will likely depend on three pillars: fashionable and comfortable design, seamless and powerful AI integration via Siri, and a compelling narrative around privacy. As testing continues toward a potential 2027 launch, these Apple smart glasses could redefine the boundary between personal technology and personal accessory. FAQs Q1: When will Apple release its smart glasses? Based on Bloomberg’s reporting, Apple is targeting a potential unveiling in late 2026, with a consumer launch likely in 2027. Q2: What will Apple smart glasses be able to do? Reported features include taking photos and videos, answering phone calls, playing music, and interacting with an upgraded Siri AI assistant. They are not expected to have built-in displays for AR visuals. Q3: How are these glasses different from the Apple Vision Pro? The Vision Pro is a full spatial computing headset with displays for immersive experiences. The smart glasses are designed to be a lightweight, all-day wearable with audio and camera-based features, closer in concept to smart audio glasses. Q4: Why is Apple testing four different designs? Testing multiple designs helps Apple gauge consumer preference for style, fit, and comfort. It also suggests the company may launch multiple models simultaneously to appeal to different tastes, much like the standard eyewear industry. Q5: What are the biggest challenges for Apple’s smart glasses? Key challenges include achieving all-day battery life in a small form factor, ensuring user privacy with always-available cameras, delivering a truly reliable and contextual AI experience, and convincing consumers to adopt a new type of always-on wearable. This post Apple Smart Glasses: Four Competing Designs Revealed in Crucial Testing Phase first appeared on BitcoinWorld .