Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%


PRICE
+20.86%
$0.8962

PRICE
+7.69%
$1.86
PRICE
+5.64%
$0.03806

PRICE
+2.88%
$41.63

PRICE
+0.84%
$0.008983

PRICE
+0.74%
$0.052
PRICE
+0.54%
$1.8

PRICE
+0.42%
$70.01

PRICE
+0.40%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.39%
$1.04

PRICE
+0.24%
$0.9968

PRICE
+0.10%
$1.1

PRICE
+0.10%
$1.13

PRICE
+0.03%
$0.9998

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9999

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9993

PRICE
+0.01%
$114.62

PRICE
+0%
$11.02

PRICE
+0%
$1.21

PRICE
+0%
$1

PRICE
+0%
$1.13

VOL24
+89,070.24%
$1.13

VOL24
+406.67%
$0.9968

VOL24
+283.94%
$0.9999

VOL24
+116.09%
$1.01

VOL24
+111.6%
$1.04

VOL24
+72.16%
$0.04781

VOL24
+65.16%
$0.057

VOL24
+56.91%
$70.01
VOL24
+53.3%
$0.03806

VOL24
+43.56%
$2,684.29

VOL24
+39.41%
$0.052

VOL24
+38.37%
$4,846.39

VOL24
+37.05%
$0.9993

VOL24
+36.82%
$2.15

VOL24
+33.47%
$6.96

VOL24
+30.15%
$0.9997

VOL24
+22.74%
$0.9993

VOL24
+21.48%
$1.86

VOL24
+17.19%
$4,846.81

VOL24
+14.49%
$0.7695

VOL24
+6.52%
$0.9997

VOL24
+4.23%
$0.8969

VOL24
+3.4%
$0.056

VOL24
+3.33%
$0.6929

VOL24
+1.82%
$0.3018

PRICE
+20.86%
$0.8962

PRICE
+7.69%
$1.86
PRICE
+5.64%
$0.03806

PRICE
+2.88%
$41.63

PRICE
+0.84%
$0.008983

PRICE
+0.74%
$0.052
PRICE
+0.54%
$1.8

PRICE
+0.42%
$70.01

PRICE
+0.40%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.39%
$1.04

PRICE
+0.24%
$0.9968

PRICE
+0.10%
$1.1

PRICE
+0.10%
$1.13

PRICE
+0.03%
$0.9998

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9999

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9993

PRICE
+0.01%
$114.62

PRICE
+0%
$11.02

PRICE
+0%
$1.21

PRICE
+0%
$1

PRICE
+0%
$1.13

VOL24
+89,070.24%
$1.13

VOL24
+406.67%
$0.9968

VOL24
+283.94%
$0.9999

VOL24
+116.09%
$1.01

VOL24
+111.6%
$1.04

VOL24
+72.16%
$0.04781

VOL24
+65.16%
$0.057

VOL24
+56.91%
$70.01
VOL24
+53.3%
$0.03806

VOL24
+43.56%
$2,684.29

VOL24
+39.41%
$0.052

VOL24
+38.37%
$4,846.39

VOL24
+37.05%
$0.9993

VOL24
+36.82%
$2.15

VOL24
+33.47%
$6.96

VOL24
+30.15%
$0.9997

VOL24
+22.74%
$0.9993

VOL24
+21.48%
$1.86

VOL24
+17.19%
$4,846.81

VOL24
+14.49%
$0.7695

VOL24
+6.52%
$0.9997

VOL24
+4.23%
$0.8969

VOL24
+3.4%
$0.056

VOL24
+3.33%
$0.6929

VOL24
+1.82%
$0.3018
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$0.9998
#27
$4,293,610,430
$239,501,682
4,292,802,053.85
4,292,802,053.85
MakerDAO has launched Multi-collateral DAI (MCD). This token refers to the new DAI that is collaterized by multiple assets.

Rank #3
$1.01
-0.02%

Rank #6
$0.9998
+0.03%

Rank #102
$1.01
+0.25%

Rank #148
$0.6145
-2.18%

Rank #262
$0.3112
-4.52%

Rank #264
$0.001656
-6.92%

Rank #539
$0.9998
-0.05%

Rank #544
$1.01
-0.28%

Rank #711
$0.8301
-0.46%

Rank #1295
$1.22
-6.16%

Rank #27263
$0.004811
-2.19%
5 Mar 2026, 09:25

Crypto holder Sillutina reported a large-scale theft of crypto from his personal wallets following a physical attack. The incident did not use the usual exploits, but revealed the growing danger for known crypto owners. Crypto holder Sillutuna lost over $24M in stablecoins following a physical attack and threats. The funds were diverted from personal wallets and may be laundered soon. The attack is part of an earlier trend where crypto holders are directly targeted, either for their public KOL identities or through other means of gathering information. Crypto holder and trader Sillytuna has been involved in DeFi and has mainly lost AUSD on Aave. Other researchers and trackers were alerted, in addition to law enforcement. $24 million dollar theft of AUSD from 0x6fe0fab2164d8e0d03ad6a628e2af78624060322 Involved violence, weapons, kidnapp and rape threats. Obvs police involved. Please pass on to all those who trace such things. And now… definitely out of crypto. ****ers. Still have limbs,… — Sillytuna (@sillytuna) March 4, 2026 The crypto community and investigators are still making calls to freeze funds where possible, even if they are redirected through decentralized protocols. The theft came just as crypto exploits fell to a one-year low in February, taking away just $37.7M for the entire month. At this point, personal wallet thefts may be more efficient in comparison to attacking niche smart contracts. On-chain researchers seek to intercept theft Hours after the theft, around $20M DAI were stored in two Ethereum addresses. DAI is widely used as a token that can be easily mixed through Tornado Cash. Soon after the exploit, the destination wallets started moving funds, splitting the available BTC in multiple addresses. While protocols can blacklist some wallets, some DeFi app teams do not respond to such calls, leaving exploiters to launder funds. Another $1.1M in BTC is sitting in a single address. The exploiter also used the Wagyu bridge to move funds to Arbitrum. Calls have been made to Hyperliquid to freeze funds from blacklisted addresses, so far with an unknown outcome. So far, only the creator of the Wagyu bridge has responded , stating the bridge will never freeze funds, but can blacklist addresses similar to Railgun. This time, the exploiters have not followed the usual script of quickly swapping or moving funds. Only a limited amount of funds went through Wagyu before the transactions stopped. Most of the DAI stolen still sits in the initial known addresses . Unlike DPRK exploits, the funds may be laundered more slowly over time. In general, DAI has never been frozen or censored, although it’s not accepted by centralized exchanges. Once again, DeFi and on-chain swaps may be a way to launder and partially disguise the funds. Sillytuna offers 10% bounty to return funds Sillytuna has offered a 10% reward for any returned funds, even from the exploiters themselves. Researchers are also trying to distribute the addresses to multiple protocols in a bid to intercept funds. For now, Sillytuna has not spoken of the identities of the thieves, mostly focusing on blockchain data to track the funds. Other investigators noted that the destination addresses were linked to a known scammer wallet. The original wallet , with its special address starting with 0xbeef, has been known in previous exploits, rug pulls, and malicious contract deployments. The individual case showed that the crypto community had significant skill in tracking funds on an ad hoc basis, but could become overwhelmed in intercepting all transactions. There were also no clear rules on blacklisting and freezing funds, as all protocols operated on different rules. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
24 Feb 2026, 07:00

BitcoinWorld Mortgage Tokenization Breakthrough: Framework Ventures and Better Launch Ambitious $500M Sky Ecosystem Project In a landmark move for decentralized finance, crypto venture firm Framework Ventures and mortgage service leader Better have announced a strategic partnership to tokenize $500 million in real estate mortgages, directly integrating them into the Sky stablecoin ecosystem. This ambitious project, revealed in early 2025, represents one of the most significant attempts to bridge traditional finance with blockchain technology, aiming to supply substantial credit and create novel yield-bearing assets. The collaboration signals a major evolution for the Sky ecosystem, formerly known as MakerDAO, as it expands its collateral base into the massive U.S. residential mortgage market. The $500 Million Mortgage Tokenization Project Explained Framework Ventures and Better plan to supply half a billion dollars in credit to the Sky ecosystem through this initiative. Essentially, they will convert pools of conforming residential mortgages into digital tokens on a blockchain. Consequently, these tokenized mortgages will serve as collateral within the Sky protocol, which mints the decentralized stablecoin DAI. This process unlocks liquidity from traditionally illiquid real estate assets. Moreover, the project includes issuing specialized yield-bearing tokens linked directly to the underlying mortgage payments. Therefore, investors can gain exposure to real estate debt returns without directly owning property. The technical architecture likely involves creating a legal entity to hold the mortgage notes. Subsequently, this entity issues digital tokens representing ownership interests. Smart contracts on the blockchain will then manage the flow of principal and interest payments from homeowners to token holders. This structure must navigate complex regulatory frameworks, including securities laws and real estate regulations. The partners have engaged with legal experts to ensure compliance, a critical step for mainstream adoption. Key Components of the Tokenization Framework Collateralization: Tokenized mortgages back new DAI stablecoin issuance. Yield Generation: Separate tokens distribute interest payments to investors. Risk Tranches: Tokens may be structured with varying risk-return profiles. Automated Compliance: Smart contracts enforce regulatory and loan covenants. Strategic Implications for the Sky and MakerDAO Ecosystem This partnership marks a pivotal moment for the Sky ecosystem’s growth strategy. Historically, MakerDAO’s collateral portfolio included cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and real-world assets such as treasury bills. However, introducing U.S. residential mortgages diversifies its collateral base into a multi-trillion dollar market. This diversification enhances the system’s stability by reducing correlation with crypto market volatility. Furthermore, it provides a new, substantial source of yield for the protocol, potentially making DAI more competitive with traditional savings products. The involvement of Better, a licensed mortgage originator and servicer, brings crucial real-world expertise. Better handles the origination, underwriting, and servicing of the mortgages, ensuring professional management of the underlying assets. Framework Ventures contributes deep crypto-economic design knowledge and DeFi integration experience. Together, they address the two-sided challenge of real estate finance and blockchain execution. This model could become a blueprint for future real-world asset (RWA) tokenization projects. Project Impact on Sky Ecosystem Metrics (Projected) Metric Before Initiative After Full Deployment Total Value Locked (TVL) in RWA ~$3B ~$3.5B+ DAI Supply Backed by RWA ~40% ~50%+ Annual Protocol Revenue from RWA ~$150M ~$200M+ Collateral Diversity Score Medium High Broader Context: The Rise of Real-World Asset Tokenization The Framework-Better venture arrives amid a surge in real-world asset tokenization across finance. Major institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan are exploring similar concepts. Tokenization promises increased liquidity, fractional ownership, automated compliance, and 24/7 settlement. The global real estate market, valued at over $300 trillion, presents a prime target for this innovation. However, previous attempts have faced hurdles around legal clarity, custody, and market acceptance. This project distinguishes itself through its scale and direct integration with a major DeFi protocol. The $500 million target is notably larger than most pilot programs. Additionally, linking directly to DAI creation creates immediate utility for the tokens. Success could catalyze further institutional capital flows into decentralized finance. Conversely, challenges include interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and maintaining regulatory alignment as laws evolve. The partners have structured a multi-phase rollout to mitigate these risks, beginning with a smaller pilot before scaling to the full amount. Expert Analysis on Market Impact Industry analysts highlight the project’s potential to lower borrowing costs for homeowners. By creating a more efficient capital market for mortgages, savings could be passed to consumers. However, they also caution about smart contract risk and the need for robust oracle systems to report loan performance accurately. The success of this model depends heavily on the long-term performance of the mortgage assets, especially in varying economic conditions. Historical data from Better’s loan portfolio will be scrutinized for its default rates and credit quality. Regulatory Landscape and Compliance Considerations Navigating the U.S. regulatory environment is paramount for this project. Tokenized mortgages likely qualify as securities under the Howey Test, requiring registration or an exemption. The partners are reportedly working under existing frameworks for private placements. Furthermore, each token must represent a valid legal claim to the underlying mortgage cash flows. This requires precise legal structuring and potentially the use of special purpose vehicles (SPVs). State-level mortgage servicing laws also add complexity, as foreclosure processes and borrower rights vary across jurisdictions. The project engages with regulators through established channels. Better, as a licensed entity, already operates within strict federal and state guidelines. Extending this compliance to the blockchain layer involves novel approaches, such as embedding regulatory rules into smart contract code. This “compliance by design” approach could set a new standard for the industry. The partners have allocated significant resources to legal and compliance teams, understanding that regulatory missteps could jeopardize the entire initiative. Conclusion The collaboration between Framework Ventures and Better on a $500 million mortgage tokenization project represents a bold step toward merging traditional finance with decentralized protocols. By bringing real estate debt into the Sky ecosystem, they aim to enhance stability, generate yield, and demonstrate a scalable model for real-world asset integration. This initiative’s success could redefine how capital flows through the housing market and accelerate the broader adoption of blockchain in mainstream finance. The focus on mortgage tokenization, therefore, is not just a technical experiment but a potential paradigm shift for both real estate and decentralized finance. FAQs Q1: What is mortgage tokenization? Mortgage tokenization is the process of converting rights to a mortgage’s cash flows into a digital token on a blockchain. This allows the mortgage to be traded, used as collateral, or owned fractionally, increasing its liquidity and accessibility. Q2: How does this project benefit the Sky (MakerDAO) ecosystem? It provides $500 million in new, high-quality collateral from the real estate market, diversifying the assets backing the DAI stablecoin. This reduces systemic risk and generates yield for the protocol, potentially strengthening DAI’s peg and sustainability. Q3: What are the risks for investors in the yield-bearing tokens? Primary risks include borrower default (credit risk), changes in interest rates (interest rate risk), homeowners paying off loans early (prepayment risk), and potential smart contract vulnerabilities or regulatory changes affecting the token’s structure. Q4: Is this the first attempt to tokenize real estate on blockchain? No, several smaller pilots and platforms have explored real estate tokenization. However, this project is notable for its large scale, involvement of a major mortgage originator (Better), and direct integration with a leading DeFi stablecoin ecosystem like Sky. Q5: How will homeowners be affected by this tokenization? Homeowners with mortgages included in the program should see no direct change in their loan terms, servicing, or lender relationship. Better will continue to service the loans. The potential long-term benefit could be a more efficient mortgage market leading to lower rates, but this is not guaranteed for existing loans. This post Mortgage Tokenization Breakthrough: Framework Ventures and Better Launch Ambitious $500M Sky Ecosystem Project first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
19 Feb 2026, 10:37

The Uxlink hacker returned after three months, purchasing a total of 5,493.26 ETH. The hacker may be utilizing the buy-the-dip opportunity amid the ETH price crash. In 2025, the hacker exploited the Uxlink protocol’s vulnerability, resulting in the loss of millions of funds. After months of silence, the infamous Uxlink hacker has resurfaced, making headlines with a fresh move. The hacker has been reportedly purchasing Ethereum using DAI, signaling a return to active trading after a three-month break. The Uxlink hacker previously exploited the vulnerabilities in the protocol, leading to a multi-million-dollar breach. Since the hack, the attacker has executed a series of high-value transactions while largely avoiding detection. This makes the latest movement a closely watched event in the crypto industry. Uxlink Hacker Back in Action with ETH Move According to the findings of an X account called “@ai_9684xtpa,” the notorious Uxlink hacker has returned with a massive Ethereum transaction. The hacker has started buying Ethereum again, this time using DAI. The analyst stated that four addresses linked to the hacker purchased a total of 5,493.26 ETH, worth about $10.87 million. These tokens were bought at an average price of$1,979 per Ether. While these ETH tokens were purchased using DAI, which were acquired by the hacker by swapping the stolen funds. Still, after multiple batches of Ether purchases, the Uxlink hacker holds about 21.42 DAI. How the Uxlink Hack Happened? The Uxlink hack, which took place on September 22, 2025, resulted in a financial loss of $11 million. The attack was reportedly carried out by an unknown hacker via a carefully planned external attack. The hacker used advanced social engineering methods to access the system while maintaining system security. The attacker also used deepfake videos to impersonate a business partner and established trust with the team member. This gave them access to the team member’s Telegram account and personal device. With this access, the hacker quickly took control of a smart contract and minted billions of fake UNLINK tokens. In addition to unauthorized UXLINK minting, the attacker transferred about $4 million in USDT, $500,000 in USDC, 3.7 WBTC, and 25 ETH. To cover their tracks and cash out, the hacker moved the stolen funds across at least six different wallets, converting most of them into Ethereum. In total, they made off with about 6,732 ETH, worth $28.1 million at the price then. They also swapped tokens to DAI and used the Arbitrum network to move the funds back to Ethereum. What the Latest ETH Purchase Suggests? The latest Ethereum purchase by the Uxlink hacker suggests that they are actively managing and possibly expanding their holdings. Buying a large number of ETH after three months of inactivity shows a deliberate strategy rather than a random move. Analysts see this as a sign that the hacker is carefully consolidating stolen or accumulated assets, potentially preparing for future transactions. The transaction is particularly noteworthy because of its timing. The hacker has purchased Ether amid the ongoing ETH downtrend. The altcoin is currently trading in the red zone, sparking widespread caution about its future. However, expert traders see this as a buy-the-dip opportunity. Considering this approach, analysts believe that the Uxlink hacker might also have accumulated the tokens utilizing the bearish price trend.
9 Feb 2026, 07:57

Crypto security incidents are increasingly being driven by simple user mistakes rather than complex hacks. Address poisoning is emerging as one of the most damaging examples. In January, a single victim lost $12.2 million after copying the wrong wallet address from their transaction history, according to Scam Sniffer. That loss followed a similar $50 million incident in December. The pattern highlights how attackers are exploiting routine copy-and-paste behaviour at scale, as dust-based scams and signature phishing expand across Ethereum and stablecoin networks. Scam Sniffer | Web3 Anti-Scam @realScamSniffer · Follow Someone lost $12.25M in January by copying the wrong address from their transaction history. In December, another victim lost $50M the same way.Two victims. $62M gone.Signature phishing also surged — $6.27M stolen across 4,741 victims (+207% vs Dec).Top cases:· $3.02M — 9:15 AM · Feb 8, 2026 35 Reply Copy link Read 6 replies Address poisoning keeps delivering big losses Address poisoning works by flooding wallets with tiny transactions from addresses that closely resemble trusted ones. These dust transfers appear in a user’s transaction history, increasing the risk that the victim later copies a malicious address by mistake. Scam Sniffer said the January incident was a clear example of how a single error can lead to catastrophic losses. Security firm Web3 Antivirus described address poisoning as one of the most consistent ways large amounts of crypto are lost, noting that it has tracked individual cases ranging from $4 million to as much as $126 million. The firm added that recent cases suggest the trend is not slowing. Researchers explained that attackers generate full wallet addresses matching the same first and last characters as legitimate ones, while changing the middle section. When viewed quickly, especially in long transaction lists, the addresses can appear identical. Signature phishing adds another layer of risk Alongside address poisoning, Scam Sniffer reported a sharp rise in signature phishing activity. In January, $6.27 million was stolen from 4,741 victims through malicious transaction signatures, representing a 207% increase compared with December. Signature phishing relies on a different mechanism. Instead of copying the wrong address, users are tricked into signing transactions that grant attackers permissions such as unlimited token approvals. Once approved, funds can be drained without further action from the victim. Losses were highly concentrated. Scam Sniffer said just two wallets accounted for 65% of all signature phishing losses recorded during the month. Cheaper Ethereum transactions fuel dust attacks Analysts increasingly link the surge in dust-based scams to lower transaction costs on Ethereum. Some speculate that the Fusaka upgrade in December reduced fees enough to make mass dusting campaigns more economical. Coin Metrics reported earlier in February that stablecoin-related dust activity now accounts for about 11% of all Ethereum transactions and 26% of active addresses on an average day. The firm analysed more than 227 million balance updates for stablecoin wallets between November 2025 and January 2026. It found that 38% of those balance updates were under a single penny, a pattern consistent with widespread address poisoning deposits rather than normal transfers. Stablecoins play a growing role Blockchain intelligence firm Whitestream said decentralised stablecoins are increasingly involved in these flows. It reported that DAI has developed a reputation as a preferred stablecoin for illicit actors, often being used as a temporary holding asset for illegally sourced funds linked to address poisoning attacks. Whitestream – Blockchain Intelligence @whitestream5 · Follow How did #DAI become the #stablecoin of choice for illicit actors on the blockchain? A recent case of address poisoning provides a practical example of this phenomenon. 2:35 PM · Feb 8, 2026 1 Reply Copy link Read 1 reply Whitestream attributed this to DAI’s governance structure, which does not cooperate with authorities in freezing wallets. That feature has made it attractive for moving or holding funds tied to recent dust-based scams. The post Why address poisoning is becoming one of crypto’s costliest scams appeared first on Invezz