hodler

12 May 2026, 03:25

Ethereum Foundation Appoints New Protocol Cluster Leads as Key Figures Depart

BitcoinWorld Ethereum Foundation Appoints New Protocol Cluster Leads as Key Figures Depart The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a leadership transition within its Protocol Cluster, appointing Will Corcoran, Kev Wedderburn, and Fredrik as the new leads. The change comes as former leads Barnabé Monnot and Tim Beiko depart the foundation, and Alex Stokes begins a sabbatical. New Leadership, Proven Contributions According to the foundation, the three incoming leads were instrumental in several recent milestones. They played key roles in launching the protocol track, advancing the Fusaka upgrade, introducing PeerDAS (a data availability sampling protocol), and increasing the mainnet gas limit. These contributions have been central to Ethereum’s ongoing scalability and performance improvements. Looking Ahead: Glamsterdam and Hegotá Upgrades The EF stated that under the new leadership, the Protocol Cluster will continue its work on the next upgrade, tentatively named “Glamsterdam,” and will begin preparations for the subsequent “Hegotá” upgrade. These upgrades are part of Ethereum’s long-term roadmap, which focuses on improving network efficiency, security, and decentralization. Why This Matters Leadership changes within the Ethereum Foundation are closely watched by the crypto community, as the foundation’s core development team directly influences the network’s technical direction. The departure of Monnot and Beiko, both well-known figures in Ethereum development, marks a significant shift. However, the promotion of internal talent suggests continuity and a focus on executing the existing roadmap. Conclusion The Ethereum Foundation’s Protocol Cluster leadership change signals a new phase for Ethereum’s core development. With experienced internal candidates stepping up, the foundation aims to maintain momentum on key upgrades while navigating a period of transition. The community will be watching closely as the team moves forward with the Glamsterdam and Hegotá upgrades. FAQs Q1: Who are the new Protocol Cluster leads at the Ethereum Foundation? A1: Will Corcoran, Kev Wedderburn, and Fredrik have been appointed as the new leads. Q2: Why did Barnabé Monnot and Tim Beiko leave the Ethereum Foundation? A2: The foundation announced their departure but did not provide specific reasons. Alex Stokes is taking a sabbatical. Q3: What is the significance of the Glamsterdam and Hegotá upgrades? A3: These are upcoming Ethereum network upgrades that are part of the long-term roadmap to improve scalability, security, and efficiency. Specific details are still being developed. This post Ethereum Foundation Appoints New Protocol Cluster Leads as Key Figures Depart first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

12 May 2026, 02:40

Fluid Repays $19.3M in Bad Debt Following March Resolv Hack

BitcoinWorld Fluid Repays $19.3M in Bad Debt Following March Resolv Hack DeFi lending platform Fluid has announced the full repayment of $19.3 million in bad debt stemming from the March hack of the Resolv protocol. The resolution, detailed in a post-mortem report released by the platform, marks a significant step in addressing the financial fallout from the incident. How the Debt Was Covered According to Fluid’s report, the bad debt was fully covered through a coordinated effort involving the Fluid team, its governance treasury, and Resolv. The platform had approximately $100 million in exposure to Resolv, with a $21 million default occurring during a depegging event triggered by the hacker. Fluid’s own smart contracts were not compromised in the incident, the report clarified. Immediate Measures Taken In the wake of the hack, Fluid implemented several measures to stabilize its operations and mitigate further risk. These included halting its buyback program and reducing token issuance. The platform’s ability to absorb the loss without broader disruption to its lending services underscores the resilience of its financial model, though the event has raised questions about the risks associated with cross-protocol exposure in DeFi. What This Means for the DeFi Sector The resolution of this debt is a positive signal for the broader DeFi ecosystem, demonstrating that platforms can recover from significant exploits without collapsing. However, it also highlights the ongoing challenges of managing risk in a highly interconnected space. Fluid’s handling of the situation may serve as a case study for other protocols facing similar crises, particularly in terms of transparent communication and swift action. Looking Ahead: Security and Legal Frameworks Fluid has stated it plans to enhance its security protocols and introduce a legal framework for asset protection moving forward. These steps are intended to prevent similar incidents and provide clearer recourse in the event of future exploits. The platform’s commitment to transparency in its post-mortem report is likely to be viewed favorably by users and investors seeking accountability in the DeFi space. Conclusion The repayment of the $19.3 million bad debt by Fluid represents a significant milestone in the aftermath of the March Resolv hack. While the incident exposed vulnerabilities in cross-protocol dependencies, Fluid’s swift response and transparent reporting have helped restore confidence in its platform. The focus now shifts to the implementation of stronger security measures and legal safeguards to protect against future threats. FAQs Q1: What caused the $19.3 million bad debt on Fluid? The bad debt resulted from a $21 million default during a depegging event triggered by the March hack of the Resolv protocol, to which Fluid had approximately $100 million in exposure. Q2: Were Fluid’s own smart contracts compromised in the hack? No, Fluid confirmed that its own smart contracts were not compromised. The incident stemmed from exposure to the Resolv protocol. Q3: What measures is Fluid taking to prevent future incidents? Fluid plans to enhance its security protocols and introduce a legal framework for asset protection. It also halted its buyback program and reduced token issuance in the immediate aftermath of the hack. This post Fluid Repays $19.3M in Bad Debt Following March Resolv Hack first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

12 May 2026, 02:20

Upbit to Halt Polkadot (DOT) Deposits and Withdrawals for Scheduled Wallet Upgrade

BitcoinWorld Upbit to Halt Polkadot (DOT) Deposits and Withdrawals for Scheduled Wallet Upgrade South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit has announced a temporary suspension of deposit and withdrawal services for Polkadot (DOT) in order to facilitate a planned wallet upgrade. The move, which affects one of the major proof-of-stake networks, is part of standard exchange maintenance procedures aimed at enhancing network security and user experience. Timeline and Scope of the Suspension According to Upbit’s official notice, the suspension will take effect on [Insert Date if known, otherwise: a date to be announced]. During this period, all DOT deposit and withdrawal requests will be paused. Trading of DOT against other cryptocurrencies and fiat pairs on the exchange is expected to continue as normal, though users are advised to confirm this on Upbit’s platform. The exchange has stated that the upgrade is necessary to implement the latest protocol improvements on the Polkadot network. Such upgrades often involve changes to the underlying wallet infrastructure to ensure compatibility with new features, security patches, or network forks. Implications for Traders and Holders For active traders and long-term holders of DOT on Upbit, the suspension means that they will be unable to move their tokens off the exchange or deposit new DOT until the upgrade is complete. This can be a critical consideration for users who rely on quick transfers for arbitrage opportunities or who want to participate in Polkadot’s on-chain governance or staking activities. What Users Should Do Users who need to transfer DOT to external wallets, such as a hardware wallet or another exchange, should do so before the suspension begins. Those planning to deposit DOT to Upbit should also ensure their transactions are completed ahead of the deadline. The exchange typically resumes services after a successful upgrade and internal testing, which can take several hours to a day. It is also prudent for users to monitor Upbit’s official announcements for the exact resumption time, as delays can occur if unexpected issues arise during the upgrade process. Broader Context: Exchange Wallet Upgrades Wallet upgrades are a routine but essential part of exchange operations. They ensure that the exchange’s infrastructure remains synchronized with the latest blockchain protocol updates. For networks like Polkadot, which undergo regular runtime upgrades and parachain developments, exchanges must stay current to prevent compatibility issues that could lead to lost funds or transaction failures. Upbit’s proactive approach to maintaining its wallet infrastructure aligns with industry best practices. However, the temporary inconvenience highlights the dependency of centralized exchange users on the exchange’s operational schedule. Conclusion The temporary suspension of DOT deposits and withdrawals on Upbit is a scheduled technical measure designed to improve the platform’s reliability and security. While it may cause short-term friction for some users, the upgrade is ultimately aimed at providing a more stable and feature-complete service. Users are advised to plan their transactions accordingly and stay informed through Upbit’s official communication channels. FAQs Q1: Will my DOT balance on Upbit be affected during the suspension? No, your DOT balance will remain intact and accessible for trading. Only deposits and withdrawals are temporarily disabled. Q2: How long will the suspension last? The exact duration depends on the upgrade process. Upbit will resume services after the wallet upgrade is completed and tested. Typically, such suspensions last from a few hours to a day. Q3: Can I still trade DOT on Upbit during the suspension? Yes, trading of DOT is expected to continue normally on the exchange. The suspension only affects the ability to deposit or withdraw DOT tokens. This post Upbit to Halt Polkadot (DOT) Deposits and Withdrawals for Scheduled Wallet Upgrade first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

12 May 2026, 01:30

Ordinals Browser Ord.io to Shut Down on June 1 After Three Years of Service

BitcoinWorld Ordinals Browser Ord.io to Shut Down on June 1 After Three Years of Service Ord.io, a widely used browser for Bitcoin Ordinals, has announced that it will cease operations on June 1. The platform, which launched three years ago, disclosed the news via a post on X, stating that it has served over one million users during its operational period. Background and Context Ord.io emerged as a key tool for exploring and interacting with Bitcoin Ordinals, a protocol that enables the creation of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) directly on the Bitcoin blockchain. The browser allowed users to view, search, and manage Ordinal inscriptions, contributing to the broader adoption of Bitcoin-based digital collectibles. Its closure marks a significant moment for the Ordinals ecosystem, which has seen fluctuating interest and development since its inception. What Happens After Shutdown Following the termination of service on June 1, Ord.io has confirmed that its records will be uploaded to GitHub. This move ensures that historical data and user contributions remain accessible to the public, though the interactive browsing functionality will no longer be available. The decision to archive on GitHub reflects a commitment to transparency and community access, even as the platform itself shuts down. Implications for Users and the Ordinals Community For the over one million users who relied on Ord.io, the shutdown means losing a primary interface for Ordinals exploration. Users are advised to back up any critical data or inscriptions linked to their accounts before the deadline. The broader Ordinals community may see this as a signal of consolidation within the niche, as smaller browsers and tools face sustainability challenges in a rapidly evolving market. Other alternatives, such as Gamma.io and Ordinals.com, remain operational, though none replicate Ord.io’s specific feature set. Conclusion The closure of Ord.io on June 1 represents the end of a notable chapter in the Bitcoin Ordinals story. While the platform’s GitHub archive will preserve its legacy, users must prepare for the loss of live browsing services. The event underscores the volatile nature of blockchain-based tools and the importance of decentralized data preservation. FAQs Q1: Why is Ord.io shutting down? The team behind Ord.io announced the shutdown on X without providing specific reasons. It is likely due to operational or financial challenges common among niche blockchain tools. Q2: Will my Ordinals data be lost? No. Ord.io has stated that its records will be uploaded to GitHub, preserving historical data. However, users should export any personal data or inscriptions linked to their accounts before June 1. Q3: Are there alternatives to Ord.io? Yes. Other Ordinals browsers and explorers include Gamma.io, Ordinals.com, and Hiro Wallet’s Ordinals support. These platforms offer similar functionality, though features may vary. This post Ordinals Browser Ord.io to Shut Down on June 1 After Three Years of Service first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

12 May 2026, 01:25

Memecoin Trading App Zap to Shut Down on June 1, Users Urged to Export Keys

BitcoinWorld Memecoin Trading App Zap to Shut Down on June 1, Users Urged to Export Keys Memecoin trading platform Zap has announced it will cease operations on June 1, citing a failure to achieve the user growth needed to sustain the service. The company confirmed the shutdown in a statement, advising users to log in and export their private keys before the deadline. What Led to the Closure Zap launched with the goal of enabling anyone to buy memecoins within 30 seconds, simplifying a process often criticized for its complexity. Despite this streamlined approach, the app struggled to attract a sufficient user base. The company acknowledged that its growth expectations were not met, leading to the difficult decision to terminate the service. What Users Need to Do Zap has instructed users to log into their accounts and export their private keys before June 1. The company recommends importing these keys into a Phantom wallet, a popular self-custodial wallet that supports multiple blockchain networks. Users who fail to export their keys risk losing access to their funds permanently. Why This Matters for Memecoin Traders The shutdown of Zap highlights the volatile nature of the memecoin ecosystem, where even user-friendly platforms can struggle to gain traction. For traders, it underscores the importance of maintaining control over private keys rather than relying solely on third-party apps. The closure also raises questions about the sustainability of niche trading platforms in a market dominated by larger exchanges. Conclusion Zap’s shutdown on June 1 serves as a cautionary tale for both developers and users in the cryptocurrency space. While the app aimed to lower barriers to entry for memecoin trading, it ultimately could not overcome the challenges of user acquisition. Current users are urged to act promptly to secure their assets. FAQs Q1: What is happening to Zap? Zap is shutting down on June 1. The company will no longer provide service after that date. Q2: How do I export my private keys from Zap? Log into your Zap account, navigate to the settings or wallet section, and look for an option to export private keys. Follow the on-screen instructions. Q3: What is Phantom wallet and why should I use it? Phantom is a non-custodial wallet that supports Solana and other blockchains. Zap recommends it because it allows you to retain control of your funds after the app closes. This post Memecoin Trading App Zap to Shut Down on June 1, Users Urged to Export Keys first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

12 May 2026, 00:40

TRUMP team moves $29M in tokens as sellers tighten grip on memecoin market

The Trump memecoin’s affiliated team has moved nearly $29 million in TRUMP tokens, even as the memecoin market continues to come under pressure. Blockchain tracking platform Lookonchain said wallets connected with the project had transferred millions of tokens to a separate address and later deposited a large amount into crypto custodian BitGo. The transfers came as TRUMP traded around $2.40, fueling fears that sellers are once again ruling the market and that more downside will follow. But broader regulatory developments in the U.S. have drawn the attention of market participants. Members of the Senate Banking Committee are under pressure right before the May 14 markup of the CLARITY Act . Digital asset advocacy group Stand With Crypto (SWC) said on May 11 that it will officially score recorded votes on the legislation, representing more than 2.9 million supporters in the United States, as lawmakers consider advancing digital asset market structure rules out of committee. Large wallet transfers raise fresh market concerns The official Trump Team Allocation wallet moved 4.915 million TRUMP tokens (roughly $12.09 million) to the wallet “3S7zwP,” according to Lookonchain . Soon thereafter, the same wallet deposited another 7 million TRUMP tokens, worth about $17.22 million, to BitGo as well. *]:pointer-events-auto [content-visibility:auto] supports-[content-visibility:auto]:[contain-intrinsic-size:auto_100lvh] R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(--scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(--thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" data-turn-id="request-6a025f46-70c4-83ea-8297-28c58aa33d27-8" data-turn-id-container="request-6a025f46-70c4-83ea-8297-28c58aa33d27-8" data-testid="conversation-turn-10" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn="assistant"> Over the past three weeks, the wallet has already shifted a cumulative 7.5 million TRUMP tokens, totaling approximately $21.8 million in transfers. But even after its most recent move, the wallet still held roughly 1.5 million TRUMP tokens worth roughly $3.6 million. While the transfers don’t verify that the tokens were sold directly, traders tend to take large transactions to custodial or exchange-related wallets as a warning sign. In crypto markets, such relocations can amplify trepidations that insiders may one day sell tokens into the market. The timing has also been scrutinized, as the TRUMP memecoin has been struggling to recover amid other speculative crypto assets that have struggled to rebound. Market participants are watching closely to see if additional transfers come in the coming days. Why are sellers dominating the memecoin market? Spot trading data indicates that sellers currently have the upper hand across the memecoin space. Market-tracking tools showed more “heating” in spot trading activity, suggesting traders and participants have been trading heavily in recent sessions. But the flow is mostly selling activity, not buying. A very popular indicator, the Spot Taker Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD), has remained negative for an extended period. A negative reading usually suggests that aggressive sellers can overpower aggressive buyers in the market. This is important because a lot of trading, coupled with high seller power, tends to cause knock-on price drops. When traders jump at the risk they carry by exiting positions simultaneously, prices fall faster as liquidity worsens. The larger memecoin market has been struggling for weeks, even as traders retreat from high-risk, speculative assets. Uncertainties in the crypto market and a decline in investor appetite for meme-based tokens have curtailed buying momentum. TRUMP, which previously enjoyed heavy social media buzz and political branding, has not escaped the broader downturn. While wallet activity recently began attracting attention on the internet, the token price was almost entirely flat in response, a result some analysts consider a signal that the market is still weak. Could TRUMP fall below $2? Despite millions of dollars in transacted tokens, TRUMP was still trading around $2.40. Technical signals now indicate that bearish momentum remains strong. One of the most important metrics, the Balance of Power indicator, remained firmly in negative territory at about -0.68. This is usually an indication that sellers are more powerful in controlling price action than buyers. Another technical signal, the Aroon Oscillator, has remained negative for almost two weeks as well. Recently, the indicator was at or near -28, reinforcing expectations of further deterioration. Combined, they indicate sustained bearish pressure in the market. If things persist, analysts say, TRUMP could head below the $2.30 level of support that matters. And that would be a more likely slide toward $2.00. Traders need to see, for now, whether team-linked wallet tokens keep moving and whether memecoins’ overall sentiment improves. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .