Invest ideasNews
27 Apr 2026, 14:05
Pundit Says You Will Use XRP Without Even Knowing. Here’s Why
The most powerful technologies usually work behind the scenes. People use online banking, digital payments, and internet services every day without thinking about the systems that make them possible. As blockchain technology becomes more embedded in global finance, many analysts expect digital assets to follow a similar path. That view gained fresh attention after Crypto Dyl News shared a video clip on X discussing XRP’s future role in mainstream finance. The speaker argued that most people will eventually use services powered by the XRP Ledger without even realizing it, much like people use the internet today without understanding its underlying infrastructure. Why XRP Could Power Everyday Financial Systems In the video shared by Crypto Dyl News, the speaker explained that the world is moving toward tokenization, where real-world assets such as money, bonds, securities, and real estate operate on blockchain-based networks. He said most people will only notice that financial technology is faster, cheaper, and more efficient. They will not stop to ask what system powers that improvement. Instead, they will get better services while the XRP Ledger works quietly behind the scenes. YOU WILL USE $XRP WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING IT… The world will rely on tokenization and the #XRP ledger will be the center of it for institutions. We are witnessing the “dot com” era unfold pic.twitter.com/gZt5nmk7n9 — Crypto Dyl News (@cryptodylnews) April 26, 2026 According to him, XRP’s long-term success will not come from public hype or constant discussion on social media. It will come from real institutional adoption and infrastructure development. He compared this stage of blockchain growth to the early “dot-com” era, when internet technology expanded behind the scenes before becoming essential in daily life. Institutions Continue to Explore Tokenization This argument aligns with a broader industry trend. Major financial institutions continue to explore tokenization as one of the next major developments in global finance. Firms such as BlackRock and JPMorgan have publicly discussed tokenized assets, digital settlements, and blockchain-based financial systems. The XRP Ledger has remained part of that conversation because of its speed, low transaction costs, and focus on cross-border settlement efficiency . Ripple has also spent years building payment infrastructure for institutions, strengthening the long-term use case for XRP beyond retail speculation. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Supporters believe that if tokenized finance grows at scale, settlement networks like XRPL could become essential parts of the financial system rather than optional alternatives. Utility Could Matter More Than Hype The speaker also stressed that major XRP price gains would probably come from adoption rather than excitement. He argued that XRP would rise in value because institutions use the infrastructure, not because the public constantly talks about the token. This idea resonates strongly with long-term XRP holders who see utility as the asset’s strongest advantage . They believe sustainable value comes from real-world use, not short-term market hype. Crypto Dyl News’ post reflects a growing belief across the XRP community that the asset’s greatest success may happen quietly. If tokenization becomes the foundation of modern finance, many people may rely on XRP-powered systems every day without ever knowing the technology behind them. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Pundit Says You Will Use XRP Without Even Knowing. Here’s Why appeared first on Times Tabloid .
27 Apr 2026, 13:15
CoinDesk 20 performance update: Stellar (XLM) drops 3.4%, leading index lower
NEAR Protocol (NEAR), down 2.9%, was also among the underperformers.
27 Apr 2026, 11:47
K-Bank teams with Ripple for instant blockchain money transfers
🚀 K-Bank partners with Ripple for instant blockchain money transfers. Both will pilot almost real-time global remittances using $XRP. Continue Reading: K-Bank teams with Ripple for instant blockchain money transfers The post K-Bank teams with Ripple for instant blockchain money transfers appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
27 Apr 2026, 11:45
Aave Enters Cross-Chain Integration with Solana Signaling the Next Stage of DeFi Growth
Aave has stepped into the next stage of growth with an official entry on Solana, opening doors to native trading in one of the fastest growing blockchain ecosystems. The project is built on top of Sunrise, which serves as a cross-chain backbone for easy asset transfer and aggregation. This enables AAVE tokens to be traded directly in Solana-based wallets, decentralized exchanges (DEXs), and aggregators without the need for wrapped tokens or complicated bridging mechanisms. The integration significantly lowers barriers for users looking to tap into Aave liquidity in the Solana ecosystem. It is also representative of a wider trend in DeFi as protocols break beyond the boundaries of a single chain and find users where liquidity and activity are greatest. BREAKING: $AAVE from @aave is now live on Solana via @sunrisedefi pic.twitter.com/3ncytsnzrW — Solana (@solana) April 27, 2026 Sunrise Infrastructure Enables Seamless Cross-Chain Asset Movement At the heart of this extension is Sunrise, which allows users to transfer AAVE tokens across chains with minimal resistance. Instead of typical bridges, which add a new attack surface and make the operation more complex, this proposition keeps the functional nativity of assets in any ecosystem and delivers, on top of it, a much better experience. This integration allows users with AAVE that exist outside Solana to port tokens onto the Solana network and vice-versa; an ideal breeding ground for cross-chain interoperability. Solana has high throughput and low transaction costs, so this capability extends participation, especially from those who have these two features as their utmost priority. The result is a seamless liquidity experience, where users are able to interact with Aave across different ecosystems without being restricted to one blockchain. Such a level of interoperability is becoming a defining feature for next-generation DeFi platforms. $AAVE is now listed on @Solana via Sunrise. You can now trade @aave natively across Solana wallets, DEXs, and aggregators. If you hold AAVE outside Solana, you can move it onto Solana and back using Sunrise. pic.twitter.com/RfFyWmyhcC — Sunrise | Listings on Solana (@sunrisedefi) April 27, 2026 Wallets, DEXs & Native Access across all Aggregators Now that the integration is live, AAVE can be used on a wide array of popular Solana applications. Users can trade and manage their tokens using Phantom, Solflare, Jupiter Exchange, as well as Titan Exchange, dFlow and other ecosystem tools. Aave liquidity is ENDLESSLY integrated in the daily life of Solana users. AAVE integrates well into the native experience across wallets and trading platforms rather than rendering it useless by requiring instrument-specific interfaces for DEXs. This integration can also help aggregators make AAVE trades more efficiently. It also contributes to better price discovery and execution quality and thus improves the overall user experience. Rather than simply extending its presence, Aave is integrating into Solana’s application layer and establishing itself as a foundational liquidity provider in one of the hottest DeFi ecosystems. Capital Injection By Babylon Foundation To Boost Ecosystem In parallel to this technical growth, Aave is getting heavy institutional support, thanks to a $3 million USDT deposit into the protocol courtesy of Babylon Foundation. This allocation is split strategically; $2 million to Aave V3 and $1 million to the upcoming V4. Such a capital infusion is an indication of strong confidence in both the current infrastructure of Aave and its roadmap for the future. Importantly, interest accrued will not be siphoned off into profit, but instead reinvested in the ecosystem courtesy of Aave x Babylon integration incentives. This way the capital is always still there to create a resilient protocol, and be a propellant for an ecosystem tomorrow. Babylon’s announcement highlights its commitment to DeFi as a building block of contemporary finance. Babylon brings native Bitcoin into DeFi and bringing more Bitcoin into DeFi means supporting in hard moments. Babylon Foundation will deposit $3M USDT into Aave, with $2M allocated to V3 and $1M to V4, as a show of support and confidence in @aave and DeFi. Any interest earned… https://t.co/ZXvLIoOI8M — Babylon Foundation (@bbn_foundation) April 26, 2026 Babylon’s engagement is particularly significant because it intends to combine Bitcoin liquidity with DeFi structures. Babylon connects both the largest and oldest crypto asset Bitcoin (BTC) to DeFi protocols like Aave, helping unify a large asset class with programmable functionalities of DeFi. Such alignment, however, becomes especially important in times of market stress. Babylon is putting more capital into Aave and building a stronger liquidity base for the protocol while also signaling confidence in its stability & resilience amidst the KelpDAO incident. The strategy echoes a wider ethos: providing assistance to DeFi ecosystems both in good times and bad. This sort of unified support is critical to help stabilize markets and keep faith with users grounded. Expansion to Other Chains Signals Next Growth Phase The significance of Aave’s Solana expansion affiliated with the capital commitment by Babylon represents a period of transformation. It showcases a shift from a solitary bloom to that of networked flourish, spanning multi-chains and liquidity sources. Cross-chain deployments become more easily accessible, so users of all sorts of ecosystems can open and close Aave positions without a second thought. Meanwhile, liquidity growing on both Ethereum platforms and Solana also feeds network effects. If adoption maintains this trajectory, the integration of such solutions may result in more efficient capital flows, deeper liquidity pools, and greater user engagement across the DeFi ecosystem. More significantly, it serves as an exemplar of how top protocols can expand in a world where the reality is multi-chain. Instead of competing to overwhelm one chain or another, the DeFi future seems much more about cooperation and new ways of working together. With Aave’s expansion, it lies well at the crossroads of this transformative opportunity where technical sophistication meets strategic capital support. The next wave of DeFi growth could therefore be less about new protocols and more about the ways established leaders expand their reach across the entire ecosystem. Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services. Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news !
27 Apr 2026, 11:27
Binance Listing May Boost Pi Network’s (PI) Price – But Don’t Expect a Game-Changer
Pi Network’s native token debuted at the start of 2025, rising to as high as $3 shortly after. Since then, though, it has undergone a deep pullback and currently trades about 94% below its all-time peak. According to some market observers, a potential PI listing on Binance could spark a bull run. One analyst, though, claimed that such a scenario could only create a FOMO effect, rather than a meaningful shift in the token’s long-term valuation. Beware of This Possible Effect It was in February last year that Pi Network finally launched its Open Network, making PI publicly accessible and enabling exchanges to list it. The first to hop on the bandwagon were Bitget, OKX, and MEXC, while Binance was widely speculated to follow suit. The company added more fuel to the rumors by holding a community vote asking its users whether they want to see the coin available on the platform. Over 85% of voters selected the “yes” option, yet Binance has not respected their wish. Since then, a potential listing on the world’s biggest crypto exchange has been among the most discussed topics within the PI community, as most members believe such a development could act as a major catalyst for a price explosion. X user PiCoin Fan recently argued that backing from the behemoth may indeed trigger a rally, but only in the form of FOMO (fear of missing out) as liquidity increases. The psychological phenomenon happens when people rush to buy a certain token only because they are afraid others will profit without them. It usually creates a fast, emotional price spike that isn’t based on real fundamentals but hype. FOMO rallies are typically short-lived and followed by a sharp correction as excitement fades and early buyers take profits. The analyst claimed that the long-term future of PI depends on building a healthy ecosystem where Pioneers can actually use the token to trade, make purchases, develop technology, and launch real dApps. Without that utility, any price growth driven by FOMO would be unsustainable. A similar pattern played out last month when Kraken listed PI. The token climbed steadily amid rumors of the upcoming listing, reaching a multi-month high of $0.30 once the news became official. The excitement, though, was short-lived, and the price quickly dropped back below $0.20. Waiting for This Development Another factor that could drive a price revival in Pi Network’s native cryptocurrency is the project’s ecosystem’s advancement. Over the past several months, the Core Team has rolled out numerous updates, with the migration to protocol 22 coming next. Some community members revealed last week that the mandatory upgrade must be completed by April 27, but Pi Network has not yet confirmed or commented anything on the matter. The post Binance Listing May Boost Pi Network’s (PI) Price – But Don’t Expect a Game-Changer appeared first on CryptoPotato .
27 Apr 2026, 11:07
Digital ledger technology explained: a guide for crypto
Digital ledger technology encompasses various structures beyond blockchain, affecting finance and applications. Blockchain is a specific DLT structure emphasizing security and decentralization, while alternatives like DAG offer scalability. Understanding DLT's architecture and consensus mechanisms is crucial for evaluating crypto projects and managing risks. Blockchain dominates the headlines, but the technology powering the broader crypto ecosystem is often misunderstood, misnamed, or simply overlooked. Many investors and technologists use "blockchain" and "distributed ledger technology" as if they mean the same thing, but that assumption can lead to costly blind spots when evaluating projects or assessing risk. Digital ledger technology, or DLT, is the wider category that blockchain belongs to, and understanding the distinction matters more than ever as new DLT architectures reshape finance, trading infrastructure, and decentralized applications across the industry. Table of Contents What is digital ledger technology? How is DLT different from blockchain? Why does DLT matter for crypto investors? Consensus mechanisms and performance trade-offs Current challenges and future risks for DLT A practical perspective: what most DLT guides don't tell you Learn more and stay ahead in crypto and DLT news Frequently asked questions Key Takeaways PointDetailsDLT vs blockchainBlockchain is a type of DLT, but DLT covers more diverse structures useful in crypto.Consensus mattersHow a DLT validates transactions impacts speed, security, and decentralization.Investor benefitsDLT enables more transparent, auditable, and programmable investments for crypto users.Scalability and risksScalability, interoperability, and quantum threats remain top challenges for DLT adoption. What is digital ledger technology? DLT is a database technology that records and shares transaction data across multiple locations, called nodes, simultaneously. Unlike a traditional database controlled by a single company or server, DLT requires no central authority. Every participating node holds a copy of the ledger, and any new data must be verified and agreed upon by the network before it is permanently recorded. This structure creates a system where tampering with records becomes extraordinarily difficult. An attacker would need to alter data on a majority of nodes at the same time, which is computationally and logistically prohibitive on large networks. That resilience is precisely why DLT has become foundational to cryptocurrency and is now attracting serious interest from financial institutions and governments. The core features that define any DLT system include: Decentralization: No single entity controls the ledger or can unilaterally alter records. Transparency: All participants can view transaction history, depending on the network's permission settings. Immutability: Once data is recorded and confirmed, it is extremely difficult to change or delete. Consensus-driven validation: Transactions are only accepted when the network agrees they are valid. That last point is where consensus mechanisms come in. DLT uses consensus mechanisms such as Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS), and Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) to validate transactions and ensure agreement across nodes. Each mechanism has different trade-offs in terms of speed, energy use, and security, which directly affects the networks investors choose to engage with. It's also important to recognize that DLT is not synonymous with blockchain. Blockchain is one specific way to structure a distributed ledger, but other architectures exist. Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), for example, are a non-blockchain DLT structure used by networks like IOTA and Hedera Hashgraph. Understanding blockchain's impact on crypto is valuable, but it only tells part of the DLT story. Pro Tip: When researching any crypto project, look beyond the word "blockchain" in its whitepaper. Ask what DLT structure it actually uses and why. The choice of ledger architecture tells you a great deal about the project's priorities around speed, security, and decentralization. How is DLT different from blockchain? Understanding the basics of DLT, it's crucial to pinpoint how DLT and blockchain relate and what sets them apart. The simplest way to frame it: blockchain is a subset of DLT. Every blockchain is a distributed ledger, but not every distributed ledger is a blockchain. Blockchain is a specific type of DLT that organizes data into chronologically linked blocks forming a chain, while broader DLT can use alternative structures like Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) for potentially better scalability. In a blockchain, each block contains a cryptographic hash of the previous block, creating a tamper-evident chain. This structure enforces strict ordering and immutability but can introduce bottlenecks as the network scales. DAG-based ledgers, by contrast, allow multiple transactions to be processed in parallel rather than sequentially. This can dramatically increase throughput but introduces different trade-offs around blockchain transparency and auditability. For investors, this distinction matters when assessing whether a project can realistically handle the transaction volumes its use case demands. Here is a side-by-side comparison to clarify the key differences: FeatureBlockchainOther DLTs (e.g., DAG)Data structureLinked blocks in sequenceGraph or other flexible structuresConsensusPoW, PoS, DPoSPBFT, DAG-native protocolsScalabilityLimited by block size and timePotentially higher throughputTransaction finalityProbabilistic (PoW) or fast (PoS)Often deterministicPrivacy optionsVaries by networkVaries by implementationPrimary use casesCrypto, DeFi, smart contractsIoT, micropayments, enterprise The practical takeaway for investors is that blockchain's strength lies in its battle-tested security and broad developer adoption. Other DLT structures may offer speed advantages but often carry less proven track records. Understanding blockchain's significance in the current market is a solid starting point, but investors who only evaluate blockchain-based projects may miss emerging opportunities in DAG-based or permissioned DLT networks. Key distinctions to keep in mind: Blockchain enforces strict data ordering; DAG allows parallel processing. Blockchain is generally more decentralized; permissioned DLTs prioritize control and compliance. Blockchain has the largest developer ecosystems; alternative DLTs are growing but remain smaller. Why does DLT matter for crypto investors? With a clear view of DLT vs blockchain, it's time to see why investors should care. DLT fundamentally changes the trust architecture of financial systems. By removing centralized intermediaries such as banks, clearinghouses, and custodians, DLT enables direct peer-to-peer transactions that are verifiable by anyone with access to the network. For investors, this translates into several concrete advantages. DLT enhances security and transparency in crypto and blockchain by decentralizing trust and reducing intermediaries, though adoption challenges persist beyond DeFi and NFTs due to scalability, regulatory, and integration costs. The investor-relevant benefits include: Greater auditability: Every transaction is recorded on a shared ledger, making it easier to verify the history of assets and detect manipulation. Reduced counterparty risk: Smart contracts on DLT networks can execute automatically without requiring trust in a third party. Access to DeFi structures: DLT is the backbone of decentralized finance, enabling lending, borrowing, and yield generation without traditional banks. Programmable assets: Tokenized securities and programmable money are only possible because DLT allows conditional logic to be embedded directly in transactions. "DLT represents a fundamental shift in how trust is established in financial networks. Rather than relying on institutions, trust is embedded in the protocol itself." That shift is already influencing how capital flows in crypto markets. Staying current with crypto trends in 2026 is essential for investors who want to position ahead of DLT-driven changes. The 44% VC growth and stablecoin boom seen in recent data reflects how institutional capital is increasingly flowing into DLT-native infrastructure. Pro Tip: When evaluating a DeFi protocol or tokenized asset, check whether it runs on a public DLT or a permissioned one. Permissioned networks offer more control for institutions but may sacrifice the censorship resistance that makes public blockchains valuable to retail investors. Consensus mechanisms and performance trade-offs To truly understand DLT's potential and limitations for investors, you need to know how consensus mechanisms shape the performance and trustworthiness of these systems. Consensus is the process by which nodes in a DLT network agree that a transaction is valid and should be permanently recorded. The choice of mechanism determines speed, energy consumption, security, and how decentralized the network actually is. Performance benchmarks vary significantly : PoW offers high security but high energy use and lower transactions per second (TPS); PoS and voting-based mechanisms like PBFT provide better efficiency and immediate finality but involve trade-offs in decentralization. Here is a comparison of the major consensus methods: Consensus methodEnergy useSecuritySpeed (TPS)DecentralizationProof of Work (PoW)Very highVery highLow (7-30)HighProof of Stake (PoS)LowHighMedium (hundreds)Medium-HighDelegated PoS (DPoS)Very lowMediumHigh (thousands)LowerPBFTVery lowHighVery highLower A typical consensus process in a DLT network follows these steps: A user broadcasts a transaction to the network. Nodes receive the transaction and verify its validity against network rules. Validators or miners group valid transactions and propose a new block or record. The network runs its consensus protocol to agree on the proposed update. Once agreement is reached, the transaction is permanently recorded across all nodes. The updated ledger state is propagated to all participants. For investors, the choice of consensus mechanism is a direct signal of a network's priorities. A project using PoW signals a preference for maximum security at the cost of speed and energy. A project using PBFT or DPoS signals a preference for throughput, often at the cost of decentralization. Networks focused on on-chain privacy innovation often layer additional cryptographic techniques on top of their consensus layer. Understanding these trade-offs is as important as managing crypto risk in any portfolio strategy. Current challenges and future risks for DLT Even with robust mechanisms, DLT isn't a cure-all. Investors must stay alert to significant technical and market risks that could affect the value and viability of DLT-based projects. The most pressing challenges include: Scalability limits: Adding more nodes to a network can actually increase latency rather than improve performance, as consensus requires more communication between participants. This is a fundamental tension in decentralized system design. Settlement finality uncertainty: Not all DLTs provide the same guarantees. In PoW networks, finality is probabilistic, meaning a transaction is considered final only after enough blocks are added on top of it. PBFT-based systems offer deterministic finality, which is critical for institutional use. Interoperability risks: Settlement finality, interoperability risks at cross-network bridges, quantum computing threats, and scalability limits with more nodes increasing latency are all active concerns in capital markets. Cross-chain bridges have been among the most exploited attack surfaces in crypto, with hundreds of millions lost to bridge hacks in recent years. Quantum computing threats: Current cryptographic standards securing DLT networks, including elliptic curve cryptography, could eventually be broken by sufficiently powerful quantum computers. This is a long-term risk that serious investors and protocol developers are already tracking. Regulatory uncertainty: The evolving landscape of crypto regulation in 2026 adds another layer of risk for DLT-based projects, particularly those operating across multiple jurisdictions. Key statistic: Cross-chain bridge exploits have accounted for a disproportionate share of total crypto losses, highlighting interoperability as one of the most urgent unsolved problems in the DLT space. Investors evaluating DLT projects should also consult a solid blockchain scalability guide to understand how different networks are attempting to solve throughput limitations. The solutions being deployed today, including sharding, rollups, and layer-2 networks, each carry their own risk profiles and deserve careful scrutiny before capital is committed. A practical perspective: what most DLT guides don't tell you Most explanations of DLT focus on the technology's theoretical elegance and stop there. What they rarely address is the messy reality of real-world implementation, and that gap can be expensive for investors. Enterprise DLT deployments, particularly permissioned networks like Hyperledger Fabric or R3 Corda, often outperform public blockchains for specific regulatory and compliance needs. These networks sacrifice open participation in exchange for speed, privacy, and governance control. For institutional investors, that trade-off can be entirely rational. For retail investors, it signals that not all DLT innovation will be accessible or beneficial to public token holders. The more useful lens is alignment. Does the project's DLT structure actually match its stated business goal? A supply chain application that needs privacy and high throughput probably shouldn't be running on a public PoW blockchain. A decentralized lending protocol that needs censorship resistance probably shouldn't rely on a permissioned network. Reviewing DLT transparency lessons from recent deployments reveals how often this alignment is missing in practice. Pro Tip: Focus on how a project's DLT structure aligns with its actual business aim, not just the buzzwords in its marketing materials. Misalignment between technology choice and use case is one of the clearest early warning signs of a project that will struggle to deliver. Learn more and stay ahead in crypto and DLT news As DLT continues to shape the crypto world, leveraging reliable, ongoing resources is the smartest move for investors and enthusiasts alike. The space moves fast, and staying informed is not optional if you want to make well-grounded decisions. Crypto Daily covers the full spectrum of DLT developments, from protocol upgrades and regulatory shifts to emerging investment trends. Check the crypto outlook for 2026 for a macro view of where the market is heading. For a deeper technical foundation, the Bitcoin blockchain guide is an excellent companion to what you've read here. And for real-time updates on everything from DLT regulation to token launches, Crypto Daily keeps you ahead of the curve. Frequently asked questions What is the main advantage of digital ledger technology over traditional databases? DLT decentralizes trust and reduces intermediaries, providing greater transparency and resilience compared to a single-point-of-failure database controlled by one entity. Are all blockchains distributed ledger technologies? Yes, every blockchain is a type of DLT, but not all DLTs use blockchain structures. Alternative architectures like DAGs also qualify as distributed ledger technologies. How is transaction finality determined in different DLTs? Finality depends on the consensus method: PoW is probabilistic while PBFT provides deterministic finality, meaning transactions are confirmed immediately and cannot be reversed. Is DLT immune to all cyber risks? No. DLT remains vulnerable to interoperability bugs and quantum threats, particularly at cross-chain bridges and through the long-term risk of quantum computing breaking current cryptographic standards. Can DLT improve transaction speeds compared to traditional networks? Yes. Certain DLTs using PoS and PBFT provide better efficiency and immediate finality, enabling transaction throughput that can significantly outpace legacy financial infrastructure. Recommended Step-by-step crypto guide for new crypto holders Bitcoin blockchain guide: technology, benefits, and how it works - Crypto Daily What Is Blockchain and Its Impact on Crypto - Crypto Daily Why Bitcoin matters Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
