hodler

10 Feb 2026, 18:30

Top Crypto to Buy: New DeFi Token Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Steals the Spotlight From Solana (SOL)

Solana (SOL) has clearly made a name for itself in the market, appealing to developers and users due to its fast transaction times and low fees. However, more and more investors are looking to the future. This is causing the conversation around the top crypto to buy to change, particularly as investors look to DeFi crypto tokens that are providing more sustainable revenue streams. In this regard, Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is starting to steal the spotlight. Investors seeking the top crypto to buy consider Mutuum Finance (MUTM) for its untapped DeFi potential. Solana (SOL) Finding Support Amid Testing Resistance Solana (SOL) is currently bouncing from the $84-$85 support zone, which is currently testing the resistance level of the downtrend line. A strong close above the $87-$88 range could be seen as a push towards the $94-$95 range, but any failure to break above this range could result in a steep pullback. Amid Solana’s difficulties, investors seeking the next big DeFi crypto are turning to Mutuum Finance (MUTM), seeking to invest while it’s still undervalued. Earn Interest While Unlocking Capital A key feature of Mutuum Finance is the use of mtTokens, which are interest-bearing tokens created when users deposit their assets for lending, e.g., in P2C pools. The tokens grow as the lent sum earns interest. For instance, if an investor deposits 50,000 USDC into a lending pool with a 10% APY, 50,000 mtUSDC will be minted, which will grow into 55,000 mtUSDC within a year. That’s a $5,000 interest earned on the original deposit. Multichain Deployment Mutuum Finance will take advantage of the multichain deployment method in order to create more diversified revenue models and thus increase the overall value of the MUTM token. This will allow the protocol to accumulate more fees from the respective chains and thus increase the overall earnings. For instance, if the Ethereum chain were to generate $400,000 over a period of time and, upon multichain deployment, 2 more chains bring in $300,000 in fees each, that would be $1 million in fees. A portion of these earnings, say 25%, could then be used to finance the protocol’s buy-and-redistribute mechanism. Here, a portion of the fees is used to buy back MUTM tokens, which are then shared among stakers of mtTokens. In this case, $250,000 would go back to these long-term stakeholders. Mutuum Finance: Early-Stage DeFi Growth Opportunity For investors seeking to reap substantial rewards from the DeFi crypto market, Mutuum Finance (MUTM) provides the perfect entry point. Currently priced at $0.04 in Phase 7 of the ongoing presale, which will rise to $0.045 in Phase 8, early investors in the asset have already reaped substantial rewards. From the initial price of $0.01 in Phase 1, early investors in the asset have already made a 300% return on their initial investment. Moreover, for those who invest in the asset in Phase 7, there are still gains to be made given the token’s projected $0.06 launch price. Take the example of a buyer who puts $1,000 into the presale today. This position will grow to hit $1,500 at the time of launch. This potential to reap gains long before the token becomes tradeable has attracted more than 18,970 investors to the presale, with over $20 million raised so far. Although the Solana blockchain offers high speeds, the focus in the crypto market has shifted to revenue-generating DeFi crypto protocols. Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is currently the top crypto to buy, and for good reason. The asset, currently priced at $0.04, offers a live lending platform, mtTokens that earn interest, and a token buyback and redistribution mechanism to reward holders. The asset has already raised over $20.4 million in the ongoing presale. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://mutuum.com/ Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance

10 Feb 2026, 18:15

MegaETH Goes Live, Challenging Layer 2 Norms With Real-Time Design

MegaETH launched its public mainnet this week, positioning itself as a performance-first blockchain designed to deliver real-time execution rather than fit neatly into existing layer one (L1) or layer two ( L2) labels. MegaETH Launches Mainnet, Targeting High-Frequency DeFi and Gaming The MegaETH project frames its approach around ultra-low latency and high throughput, aiming to

10 Feb 2026, 18:05

Blockchain.com Secures UK Registration: $LIQUID Brings Harmony

What to Know: Blockchain.com has successfully registered with the UK’s FCA after a four-year effort, signaling growing regulatory clarity in the region. Increased regulatory approval builds institutional confidence and shifts focus toward solving core crypto challenges like fragmented liquidity. LiquidChain is a Layer 3 protocol designed to unify liquidity from Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana into a single execution layer. After a protracted four-year process, crypto exchange and wallet provider Blockchain.com has officially secured registration as a cryptoasset business with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The development marks a significant milestone, not just for the London-based company, but for the broader UK digital asset landscape. It signals a move toward greater regulatory clarity in a key global financial hub. That kind of clarity breeds confidence. And it lays the trust foundation needed for the next wave of innovation to actually ship, not just get pitched. The road to approval was anything but smooth. Blockchain.com initially withdrew its application in March 2022, facing an impending deadline without a clear path to licensing. Its return and subsequent success underscore a thawing in the relationship between crypto firms and UK regulators. This approval allows the firm to offer digital asset services to its UK customers in full compliance with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing regulations. In practical terms, it helps normalize crypto operations, moving them from a regulatory grey zone into the mainstream financial ecosystem. What changes on day one? Not much. The signal to larger pools of capital? Huge, because institutions track these green lights closely. As institutional players and cautious capital observe these developments, the demand for robust, transparent, and scalable on-chain infrastructure is exploding. The market is maturing beyond isolated ecosystems, and the next frontier is unifying them. That’s exactly where new protocols built for a regulated, cross-chain world are starting to find their footing. Projects like LiquidChain ($LIQUID). LiquidChain Fuses $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL Liquidity As regulatory frameworks solidify, the focus shifts to solving crypto’s core technical challenge: fragmented liquidity. Billions of dollars are locked in separate, siloed ecosystems like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, creating inefficiency and poor user experiences. LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is a new Layer 3 protocol engineered to dismantle these walls. It’s building a unified liquidity layer that fuses the three largest crypto ecosystems into a single, cohesive execution environment. This isn’t just another bridge. LiquidChain’s architecture lets developers deploy an application once and gain native access to the liquidity and user bases of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana simultaneously. The second-order effect is a sharp drop in complexity for both builders and users. No more juggling risky wrapped assets or multi-step cross-chain swaps. Instead, the protocol offers Single-Step Execution, where complex operations across chains are settled verifiably in one go. Ambitious? Absolutely, but it’s already resonating with early backers. The project’s presale has drawn notable interest, raising over $533K with its $LIQUID token priced at just $0.0136. That early momentum suggests a strong appetite for solutions that tackle DeFi’s most persistent pain points. BUY YOUR $LIQUID FROM ITS OFFICIAL PRESALE PAGE A New Infrastructure for a Maturing Market The timing for a protocol like LiquidChain couldn’t be better. With institutional-grade regulatory clarity on the horizon, the demand for equally professional infrastructure is paramount. Institutions don’t want to deal with fragmented systems; they need seamless, efficient, and verifiable platforms for capital allocation. LiquidChain’s Cross-Chain VM (Virtual Machine) aims to provide precisely this, an environment where assets from disparate chains can interact without custodial risk. In previous cycles, we’ve seen regulatory green lights precede infrastructure buildouts; this pattern feels familiar, and the timing is punchy. The risk, of course, is that building such a complex L3 is a monumental technical challenge, and adoption will take time. Still, the value proposition is clear. By creating a shared liquidity and execution layer, LiquidChain aims to become the foundational plumbing for the next generation of DeFi applications. Its native token, $LIQUID, serves multiple functions within this ecosystem, including powering transactions (as gas), rewarding liquidity providers through staking, and funding developer grants to expand the network. For a market that’s finally growing up, infrastructure that abstracts away the complexity of a multi-chain world isn’t just a convenience, it’s a necessity. LEARN MORE ABOUT LIQUIDCHAIN This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. All investments carry risk, especially in the volatile crypto market.

10 Feb 2026, 18:03

MemeCore Profits Pale in Comparison: Bitcoin Everlight App Delivers Guaranteed High-Yield Bitcoin Rewards

Speculative Layer-1 ecosystems built around narrative momentum have struggled to provide stable participation economics during the 2026 market drawdown. Operator incentives tied directly to native tokens have amplified downside exposure as price compression continues across multiple sectors. This environment has accelerated interest in participation models that separate operational rewards from token price performance, particularly those anchored to measurable network activity and external settlement assets. MemeCore’s Incentive Model Meets Harsh Reality MemeCore was designed as an EVM-compatible Layer-1 focused on a “Meme 2.0” economy, using its Proof of Meme consensus system to reward cultural relevance and on-chain viral engagement. Participation outcomes are therefore influenced by social momentum in addition to validator activity. As of February 2026, MemeCore’s native token trades near $1.41 after rebounding from a brief flash-crash range between $1.12 and $1.20 earlier in the month. Despite the recovery, the asset remains roughly 52% below its $2.96 cycle high. Network participation economics remain closely tied to token valuation, leaving operators exposed to continued volatility while broader market direction remains uncertain. Everlight’s Role Alongside Bitcoin Bitcoin Everlight functions as a Bitcoin-adjacent transaction coordination layer that operates without altering Bitcoin’s protocol, monetary policy, or consensus rules. The system is designed to handle execution-layer activity such as transaction routing and coordination, while Bitcoin retains final settlement authority. Transaction confirmations are achieved through quorum-based validation across Everlight nodes, typically completed in seconds. For additional settlement assurance, activity can be periodically anchored back to Bitcoin, creating a linkage between execution speed and base-layer finality without introducing protocol changes. How Everlight Nodes Generate BTCL Rewards Everlight nodes perform operational tasks including transaction routing, uptime maintenance, and performance verification. These nodes are not Bitcoin full nodes and do not validate Bitcoin blocks. Their function is limited to execution-layer coordination within the Everlight network. Node operators commit BTCL to participate and earn Bitcoin derived from real network usage. BTC distribution is calculated using routing throughput, uptime coefficients, performance metrics, and node tier classification. Everlight supports Light, Core, and Prime node tiers, each carrying increasing routing responsibility and proportional access to BTC-denominated network rewards. No lock period is enforced. Participation is flexible, with Bitcoin earned only while nodes remain active and performant. Nodes that fail to meet performance thresholds lose routing priority and associated BTC allocation until operational standards are restored. Participation Model Comparison Dimension MemeCore Bitcoin Everlight Reward Asset Native token Bitcoin (BTC) Reward Basis Cultural & viral signals Transaction routing activity Exposure to Token Price High Limited Mandatory Lockup Protocol-defined None Node Function Scope Consensus & signaling Execution & routing Bitcoin Layer Impact None No protocol changes Running Nodes Through a Mobile Interface Everlight node participation is managed through a dedicated mobile application, allowing operators to monitor and adjust activity from a smartphone. The app provides live reporting on node status, uptime consistency, routing activity, and Bitcoin earned from network operations. Performance alerts notify operators of uptime disruptions, routing changes, and BTC distribution events. This design reduces infrastructure complexity and enables participation without constant server oversight, expanding access beyond traditional node operators. Independent third-party analysis of Everlight’s node structure and reward mechanics is available through Crypto Dex World . Audits and Team Identity Checks Are In Place Bitcoin Everlight has completed multiple independent security evaluations intended to assess smart contract logic, deployment integrity, and potential attack surfaces. Reviews conducted through the SpyWolf Audit and SolidProof Audit focus on verifying contract behavior under real-world conditions and identifying implementation risks prior to broader network usage. Beyond code review, Everlight has also completed independent team identity verification via SpyWolf Team Identity Verification and Vital Block Team Validation . These processes establish accountability by confirming the identities responsible for network development and operations, reducing counterparty opacity for participants. BTCL Presale Structure and Market Positioning Bitcoin Everlight has a fixed supply of 21,000,000,000 BTCL. Allocation is defined as 45% public presale, 20% node rewards and network incentives, 15% liquidity provisioning, 10% team allocation under vesting, and 10% reserved for ecosystem development and treasury use. The presale follows a 20-stage structure. Phase 3 is currently active with BTCL priced at $0.0012. Presale allocations unlock 20% at token generation, with the remaining 80% released linearly over six to nine months. Team allocations follow a 12-month cliff with extended vesting thereafter. BTCL utility is limited to transaction routing fees, node participation thresholds, performance incentives, and anchoring operations. In a market where token-denominated participation remains vulnerable to drawdowns, Everlight’s Bitcoin-based reward model positions network activity as a defensive alternative. If market conditions improve, increased transaction demand expands routing activity. If volatility persists, operators continue earning Bitcoin from ongoing network usage. Run Everlight nodes through the mobile app and earn Bitcoin from real network activity. Website: https://bitcoineverlight.com/ Security: https://bitcoineverlight.com/security How to Buy: https://bitcoineverlight.com/articles/how-to-buy-bitcoin-everlight-btcl

10 Feb 2026, 17:35

Rumor: SWIFT and Ripple Just Held a Private Executive Lunch In Miami

Crypto analyst Steph Is Crypto (@Steph_iscrypto) shared an image hinting at a private executive luncheon between Ripple and SWIFT in Miami. He suggests that both parties may have met to discuss the future of cross-border payments. The meeting reportedly took place at the Four Seasons Hotel in the Bayview Ballroom. While no official confirmation has been released, the gathering has drawn attention across the crypto and finance communities. Many see it as a possible signal of strategic talks between the legacy banking network and Ripple. RUMOR: SWIFT AND RIPPLE JUST HELD A PRIVATE EXECUTIVE LUNCH IN MIAMI. CROSS-BORDER PAYMENTS DEAL COMING? pic.twitter.com/VkNCKrEjUk — STEPH IS CRYPTO (@Steph_iscrypto) February 9, 2026 XRP’s Potential Role in Payments For years, XRP has been discussed as a tool for transforming cross-border transactions. Analysts have suggested that Ripple could either partner with or compete against SWIFT to improve international payment efficiency. XRP offers fast settlement times and low transaction costs, which position it as a potential backbone for global transfers . The rumored Miami meeting adds intrigue, as it indicates executives may be exploring how Ripple’s technology could integrate with SWIFT’s network. Traditional Banking Meets Blockchain Swift handles messaging for a network of over 11,000 banks worldwide, while Ripple provides blockchain-based infrastructure for real-time settlements. A potential partnership could combine SWIFT’s reach with Ripple’s technology, enabling faster, more efficient transactions. XRP could serve as a bridge asset , providing liquidity and supporting near-instant settlement across multiple currencies if such a collaboration moves forward. Ripple has long focused on building relationships with banks and financial institutions globally. Its infrastructure is designed to meet compliance standards while offering efficient liquidity management. If the rumored discussions lead to a partnership , XRP could become a key tool for connecting traditional banking networks with blockchain-based payment solutions. This would increase its role in institutional finance and cross-border transactions. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 What Could Come Next? Details of the Miami meeting remain unconfirmed. However, the rumor suggests that Ripple and Swift are exploring new options for improving international payments. Any formal engagement between the two could accelerate XRP adoption and reshape how banks settle transactions globally . Until official announcements are made, the event remains speculative, but it positions XRP as a potential central asset for cross-border payments in the future. Even as a rumor, the Miami luncheon has sparked interest in both crypto and traditional finance circles. Analysts and market participants are closely watching Ripple’s moves and its relationship with SWIFT. If the companies pursue collaboration, XRP could emerge as a critical component of global payment infrastructure. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Rumor: SWIFT and Ripple Just Held a Private Executive Lunch In Miami appeared first on Times Tabloid .

10 Feb 2026, 17:12

What Triggered Bitcoin's Major Selloff In February 2026?

Summary Leverage has been reduced meaningfully, while price action has remained orderly rather than disorderly. Multiple indicators reflect elevated stress levels, even as underlying market structure and fundamentals remain intact. Velocity, distance-from-trend, and positioning measures suggest growing potential for stabilization rather than continued acceleration lower. Bitcoin’s February selloff reflects orderly deleveraging rather than capitulation. Despite a roughly 20% YTD decline, leverage has normalized and volatility remains below prior bear-market levels. Please note that VanEck may have a position(s) in the digital asset(s) described below. Note: This commentary was written on February 5 , when Bitcoin was trading in the mid- $60,000s . Deleveraging is Driving the Bitcoin Drawdown Bitcoin has experienced a sharp drawdown over the past week, with prices falling roughly 19% and currently trading in the mid- $60,000s . The move has been driven by a rapid unwind of leverage rather than a single liquidation shock. BTC futures open interest has fallen from roughly $61 billion one week ago to about $49 billion today, a decline of more than 20% in notional exposure in just a few sessions. More broadly, futures open interest peaked above $90 billion in early October ahead of the 10/10 inflection, meaning the market has now shed over 45% of peak leverage. Bitcoin Price Movement Bitcoin’s price has declined by a similar magnitude over the same period. This symmetry cuts both ways. On one hand, it suggests leverage has been reduced alongside price rather than driving a disorderly unwind. On the other hand, it implies the market has not yet experienced a classic capitulation event where price overshoots leverage reduction. Over the past week, crypto markets experienced approximately $3 to $4 billion in total liquidations, with an estimated $2 to $2.5 billion concentrated in Bitcoin futures, indicating meaningful but not climactic forced selling. A Tail-Event Move in Terms of Speed While the magnitude of the drawdown has been orderly relative to leverage reduction, the speed of the move has been extreme. On February 5 , Bitcoin registered a -6.05σ move on the rate-of-change Z-score, placing it among the fastest single-day crashes in crypto history. In simple terms, σ measures how unusual a move is, and a reading this large means the drop was far bigger and faster than what normally happens. For context: COVID crash: -9.15σ FTX collapse: -4.07σ February 5, 2026 : -6.05σ Source: Crash velocity and ROC Z-score analysis sourced from MarketVector Indexes, research shared by Martin Leinweber as of 2/5/26. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This places the recent selloff firmly in tail-event territory. Among the 15 fastest crashes on record, February 5 ranks near the extreme end of the distribution. Historically, events of this velocity tend to exhaust panic selling rather than initiate prolonged cascades, particularly when not accompanied by systemic failure. Distance From Trend Reaches an Extreme The most striking signal emerges when viewing Bitcoin’s distance from its long-term trend. Bitcoin is currently trading -2.88σ below its 200-day moving average, a level not observed at any point in the past 10 years, including during COVID or the FTX collapse. In historical terms, 0.0% of observations have been further below the 200-day moving average. For comparison: BTC (BTC-USD): -2.88σ ( 0.0% of history) SOL (SOL-USD): -2.05σ ( 0.3% of history) ETH (ETH-USD): -1.50σ ( 5.8% of history) Source: Distance-from-trend Z-score analysis based on MarketVector Indexes, via research shared by Martin Leinweber as of 2/5/26. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This places Bitcoin at an unprecedented distance from its long-term trend, reinforcing the view that price has become statistically disconnected from underlying trend dynamics. Drawdowns Are Deep but Not Generational From a drawdown perspective, Bitcoin is now approaching a 50% peak-to-trough decline: BTC: -47.5% (worst: -83.6% ) ETH: -60.7% (worst: -94.0% ) SOL: -69.5% (worst: -96.3% ) Source: Drawdown distributions and historical comparisons sourced from MarketVector Indexes research shared by Martin Leinweber as of 2/5/26. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. While these are severe declines, they do not yet represent generational lows. However, the key distinction is that drawdowns of this depth are now coinciding with extreme velocity, extreme distance from trend, and compressed volatility, a combination that historically marks late-stage stress rather than early-cycle deterioration. Volatility Is Lower Than Prior Bitcoin Bear Markets Importantly, this drawdown has occurred alongside materially lower realized volatility than in prior bear markets. 90-day realized volatility currently sits near 38 , roughly half the levels observed during the 2022 bear market, when realized volatility exceeded 70 and Bitcoin ultimately declined approximately 78% peak to trough. The combination of a deep price drawdown and materially lower volatility suggests that a significant portion of downside risk has already been absorbed. Absent a new, Bitcoin-specific negative catalyst, relative value dynamics may begin to assert themselves. Positioning and Mean Reversion Signals Align Short-term positioning metrics reinforce the view that stress is becoming late-cycle in nature. Current 7-day declines rank in the 99 th percentile of historical outcomes: BTC: -22.2% (worse than 98.9% of history) ETH: -29.7% (worse than 99.0% of history) SOL: -32.0% (worse than 98.8% of history) Source: Drawdown distributions and historical comparisons sourced from MarketVector Indexes, research shared by Martin Leinweber as of 2/5/26. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. When markets reach the far tails of negative outcomes, mean reversion becomes increasingly probable. This is echoed in derivatives markets, where funding rates across ETH and SOL have turned negative and Bitcoin funding has compressed sharply, signaling de-risking via position reduction rather than aggressive short formation. Momentum indicators reflect similar stress. On Bitcoin futures continuation charts, RSI has fallen below 21 , an extreme oversold level that has historically preceded periods of stabilization and relief rallies. Narrative Pressure Without Structural Damage The selloff has been amplified by deterioration in adjacent risk narratives. Weakness in the AI trade has spilled into crypto, particularly impacting miners pursuing AI and high-performance computing strategies. As financing conditions tightened, miners faced pressure to sell Bitcoin to support balance sheets and capex, adding incremental spot supply at a fragile moment. At the same time, governance concerns and renewed discussion of long-term risks, including quantum computing and post-quantum security, have re-entered the conversation. Notably, quantum-related equities have sold off alongside broader risk assets, making it difficult to reconcile existential threat narratives with market-implied timelines. Crucially, none of these dynamics point to a failure of the underlying crypto infrastructure. Stablecoin (SBC-USD) adoption continues to accelerate, institutional tokenization efforts are expanding, and market plumbing has functioned as designed throughout the selloff. This remains a macro-driven bear market, not a technology-driven one. What This Setup Suggests for Bitcoin Taken together, the data paints a consistent picture: Historic crash velocity Unprecedented distance from long-term trend 99 th percentile downside moves Deep, but non-terminal drawdowns Source: Short-term return distribution analysis sourced from MarketVector Indexes, via research shared by Martin Leinweber as of 2/5/26. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Multiple signals are aligning. Even if this is not the bottom, the evidence increasingly supports the formation of a localized bottom. Statistically: Velocity panic appears exhausted Distance from trend is unsustainable Mean reversion is probable Links to third party websites are provided as a convenience and the inclusion of such links does not imply any endorsement, approval, investigation, verification or monitoring by us of any content or information contained within or accessible from the linked sites. By clicking on the link to a non-VanEck webpage, you acknowledge that you are entering a third-party website subject to its own terms and conditions. VanEck disclaims responsibility for content, legality of access or suitability of the third-party websites. DISCLOSURES Definitions Bitcoin ((BTC)) is a decentralized digital currency without a central bank or single administrator. It can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer Bitcoin network without intermediaries. Ethereum ((ETH)) is a decentralized, open–source blockchain with smart contract functionality. Ether is the native cryptocurrency of the platform. Amongst cryptocurrencies, Ether is second only to Bitcoin in market capitalization. Solana (SOL) is a high-throughput Layer-1 blockchain; SOL is used for fees and staking to secure the network. Leverage is using borrowed money or derivatives to increase exposure to an asset. While leverage can amplify gains, it also magnifies losses and can force rapid selling when prices fall. Deleveraging is the process of reducing leveraged positions, often by closing futures or margin trades. Deleveraging can push prices lower even without new negative news. Futures Open Interest is the total value of outstanding futures contracts that have not been closed or settled. High open interest signals heavy positioning, while falling open interest indicates positions are being reduced. Liquidation is the forced closure of a leveraged position when losses exceed required margin. Liquidations can accelerate price moves during sharp selloffs. Funding Rate is a periodic payment between traders in perpetual futures markets that keeps contract prices aligned with the spot price. Positive funding means longs pay shorts, while negative funding means shorts pay longs. Rate of Change ((ROC)) is measure of how fast the price of Bitcoin is moving over a given period. Large ROC values indicate unusually rapid price moves. Z-Score is a statistical measure that shows how far a value is from its historical average. A higher absolute Z-score means a move is more extreme compared to normal behavior. Sigma (σ) is another way of expressing standard deviation. It shows how unusual a price move is compared to past price movements. Larger sigma values mean rarer and more extreme events. 200-Day Moving Average is the average Bitcoin price over the past 200 days. It is commonly used to gauge long-term trend direction. Distance From Trend is how far the current price is above or below a long-term trend measure, such as the 200-day moving average. Extreme distances often occur during periods of market stress. Drawdown is the percentage decline from a recent peak to a subsequent low. Drawdowns measure the severity of losses during market downturns. Realized Volatility is a measure of how much an asset’s price has actually fluctuated over a given period. Higher realized volatility means larger and more frequent price swings. Mean Reversion is the tendency for prices or indicators to move back toward their historical average after extreme deviations. Oversold is a condition where selling pressure has been intense enough that prices may have fallen faster or further than fundamentals alone would suggest. Relative Value is an assessment of price based on comparisons to historical levels, trends, or other assets, rather than on absolute price alone. Capitulation is a phase where investors sell aggressively and indiscriminately, often marking emotional exhaustion and, in some cases, market bottoms. Risk Considerations This is not an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities, financial instruments or digital assets mentioned herein. The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, tax advice, or any call to action. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward-looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are for illustrative purposes only, are valid as of the date of this communication, and are subject to change without notice. Actual future performance of any assets or industries mentioned are unknown. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. VanEck does not guarantee the accuracy of third party data. The information herein represents the opinion of the author(s), but not necessarily those of VanEck or its other employees. The information, valuation scenarios and price targets presented on any digital assets in this blog are not intended as financial advice, a recommendation to buy or sell these digital assets, or any call to action. There may be risks or other factors not accounted for in these scenarios that may impede the performance these digital assets; their actual future performance is unknown, and may differ significantly from any valuation scenarios or projections/forecasts herein. Any projections, forecasts or forward-looking statements included herein are the results of a simulation based on our research, are valid as of the date of this communication and subject to change without notice, and are for illustrative purposes only. Please conduct your own research and draw your own conclusions. Past performance is not an indication, or guarantee, of future results. Hypothetical or model performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading, and accordingly, may have undercompensated or overcompensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors such as market disruptions and lack of liquidity. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading (for example, the ability to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses). Hypothetical or model performance is designed with benefit of hindsight. Index performance is not representative of fund performance. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Investments in digital assets and Web3 companies are highly speculative and involve a high degree of risk. These risks include, but are not limited to: the technology is new and many of its uses may be untested; intense competition; slow adoption rates and the potential for product obsolescence; volatility and limited liquidity, including but not limited to, inability to liquidate a position; loss or destruction of key(s) to access accounts or the blockchain; reliance on digital wallets; reliance on unregulated markets and exchanges; reliance on the internet; cybersecurity risks; and the lack of regulation and the potential for new laws and regulation that may be difficult to predict. Moreover, the extent to which Web3 companies or digital assets utilize blockchain technology may vary, and it is possible that even widespread adoption of blockchain technology may not result in a material increase in the value of such companies or digital assets. Digital asset prices are highly volatile, and the value of digital assets, and Web3 companies, can rise or fall dramatically and quickly. If their value goes down, there’s no guarantee that it will rise again. As a result, there is a significant risk of loss of your entire principal investment. Digital assets are not generally backed or supported by any government or central bank and are not covered by FDIC or SIPC insurance. Accounts at digital asset custodians and exchanges are not protected by SPIC and are not FDIC insured. Furthermore, markets and exchanges for digital assets are not regulated with the same controls or customer protections available in traditional equity, option, futures, or foreign exchange investing. Digital assets include, but are not limited to, cryptocurrencies, tokens, NFTs, assets stored or created using blockchain technology, and other Web3 products. Web3 companies include but are not limited to, companies that involve the development, innovation, and/or utilization of blockchain, digital assets, or crypto technologies. All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. As with any investment strategy, there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be met and investors may lose money. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss in a declining market. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. © Van Eck Associates Corporation. Original Post