hodler

22 May 2026, 07:55

OKX to List Gensyn (AI) Token for Spot Trading on May 22

BitcoinWorld OKX to List Gensyn (AI) Token for Spot Trading on May 22 OKX, one of the world’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges by trading volume, has announced it will list Gensyn (AI) for spot trading. The listing is scheduled to go live at 11:00 a.m. UTC on May 22, 2025, according to an official statement from the exchange. What is Gensyn? Gensyn is a decentralized compute protocol designed for machine learning and artificial intelligence workloads. The project aims to create a global, permissionless network of computing resources that developers can use to train AI models without relying on centralized cloud providers like AWS or Google Cloud. The native token, AI, is used to pay for compute resources and incentivize network participants. The Gensyn protocol has gained attention in the Web3 and AI communities for its approach to democratizing access to high-performance computing. By leveraging blockchain technology, the network seeks to reduce costs and barriers for AI development, particularly for smaller teams and independent researchers. Listing Details and Implications OKX confirmed that the Gensyn (AI) spot trading pair will be available on its platform starting May 22. The exchange has not yet disclosed which specific trading pairs will be offered, but standard practice includes USDT and possibly USD pairs. Deposits for the token are expected to open ahead of the listing. Exchange listings are significant events for cryptocurrency projects, as they provide liquidity, price discovery, and exposure to a broader investor base. For Gensyn, the OKX listing represents a step toward mainstream trading access, which could attract more developers and users to its decentralized compute network. Why This Matters for the AI and Crypto Sectors The intersection of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology has become one of the most actively watched narratives in the crypto market. Projects like Gensyn, Render Network, and Akash Network are competing to build decentralized alternatives to centralized AI infrastructure. The listing on a major exchange like OKX signals growing institutional and retail interest in this niche. For OKX, adding Gensyn expands its portfolio of AI-related tokens, which already includes projects focused on decentralized data, model training, and inference. The exchange has been actively listing emerging Web3 and AI tokens, positioning itself as a platform for high-growth, narrative-driven assets. Conclusion The OKX listing of Gensyn (AI) on May 22 provides traders with a new opportunity to gain exposure to a project that bridges two transformative technologies: artificial intelligence and decentralized computing. While the long-term impact of Gensyn remains to be seen, its listing on a top-tier exchange is a positive signal for the project’s visibility and liquidity. Traders and developers alike will be watching closely to see how the token performs and whether the network gains traction in the competitive AI compute market. FAQs Q1: What is the Gensyn (AI) token used for? The AI token is the native cryptocurrency of the Gensyn protocol. It is used to pay for decentralized computing resources on the network, specifically for machine learning training and inference tasks. Token holders can also participate in network governance and earn rewards by providing compute power. Q2: When will OKX list Gensyn (AI) for spot trading? OKX has announced that spot trading for Gensyn (AI) will begin at 11:00 a.m. UTC on May 22, 2025. Deposits are expected to open prior to the trading start time. Q3: Is Gensyn (AI) listed on other exchanges? As of this writing, Gensyn (AI) has limited exchange listings. The OKX listing is one of the first major exchange listings for the token. Traders should verify availability on other platforms and check official sources for the most current information. This post OKX to List Gensyn (AI) Token for Spot Trading on May 22 first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

22 May 2026, 07:34

HBAR ETF Narrative: Can Enterprise Blockchain Tokens Come Back?

HBAR has re-entered market chatter thanks to a new wave of exchange-traded fund (ETF) speculation. The pitch is simple: if spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs unlocked new demand, could a Hedera (HBAR) vehicle do the same—and reignite the broader “enterprise blockchain” theme? It’s a compelling story, but ETF paths are shaped by regulation, liquidity, custody, and market structure. Enterprise tokens also face a unique question: does corporate adoption actually translate into token demand? This guide disentangles narrative from mechanics. You’ll find the hurdles an HBAR ETF would need to clear, how enterprise blockchains can create value, what to monitor on-chain, and how to avoid common traps when trading an ETF rumor cycle. PointDetails HBAR ETF statusThere is no approved HBAR spot ETF in major markets at the time of writing; any “HBAR ETF” talk is a narrative, not a fact. Approval hurdlesRegulatory classification, robust spot-market surveillance, deep liquidity, institutional custody, and clear price discovery are prerequisites. Enterprise token valueAdoption can drive demand, but fee abstraction, grants, and centralized governance may weaken token-value linkage if not designed carefully. Potential catalystsReal-world asset tokenization, sustainability reporting, and compliant data anchoring could support enterprise networks with utility-focused tokens. Key risksUnlock schedules, regulatory actions, low-float volatility, and fake ETF headlines can hurt late buyers during narrative spikes. Actionable checklistTrack filings, watch ETP flows in Europe, verify on-chain usage, and size positions conservatively while liquidity remains uneven. What the “HBAR ETF narrative” actually means When traders say “HBAR ETF,” they usually mean two things: first, that a fund issuer could file for a spot product giving traditional investors HBAR exposure; second, that such a listing might catalyze new demand and re-rate the token. Neither outcome is guaranteed, nor imminent without visible filings and regulator sign-off. ETF chatter vs. concrete steps A credible path involves two public milestones in the United States: an exchange’s 19b-4 rule-change proposal and an issuer’s S-1 (or similar) registration. Both must be reviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). You can monitor new submissions on the SEC’s website under Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO) filings and company registrations. Pro tip: Check primary sources, not screenshots. Genuine filings appear on SEC SRO filings and EDGAR. If you don’t see them there, treat headlines as unverified. ETFs are wrappers, not adoption engines ETFs can improve access and liquidity, but they don’t create economic activity on a blockchain by themselves. For enterprise tokens like HBAR, sustainable demand typically stems from on-chain fees, staking participation, or services consumed by real users and developers. A wrapper may amplify existing interest; it rarely manufactures it from thin air. Where ETFs stand today and why altcoins face a higher bar Spot Bitcoin ETFs were approved in the U.S. in 2024, followed by spot Ethereum ETFs later that year. These decisions reflected years of market maturation: surveillance-sharing agreements, a deep and regulated futures market for the underlying, institutional custody, and clearer narratives around asset classification. Why Bitcoin and Ethereum were first Market depth: High liquidity across multiple venues helps price discovery and reduces manipulation risk. Infrastructure: Established custodians, audit practices, and benchmarks enable institutional-grade operations. Regulatory familiarity: Regulators and courts have engaged extensively with Bitcoin and Ethereum, building case law and review precedent. Why altcoin spot ETFs are harder Classification uncertainty: Many tokens face unresolved questions around whether they are securities under U.S. law, complicating ETF listing. Surveillance and integrity: Regulators weigh the risk of market manipulation and the robustness of spot-market oversight for the specific asset. Custody and staking: Proof-of-stake assets raise questions about whether funds can or should stake, and how rewards are handled for shareholders. Liquidity thresholds: Thin order books and concentrated exchanges increase tracking error and operational risk for a daily creations/redemptions vehicle. Jurisdictional nuance Outside the U.S., several European exchanges host crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs) beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. These can provide a datapoint on investor appetite but often carry lower assets under management (AUM) and thinner liquidity than flagship BTC/ETH products. The presence of an ETP does not imply regulatory acceptance in other markets. Enterprise blockchain tokens 101: design choices and demand drivers “Enterprise blockchain” describes networks optimized for predictable performance, governance, and compliance features that large organizations find workable. Hedera is often included in this category due to its Governing Council model and the use of hashgraph consensus with stake-based weighting. What HBAR does on the network Transaction fees and services: HBAR is used to pay for services on the Hedera network—like token transfers, consensus messages, and smart contract calls. See Hedera’s documentation for current details on the token’s role and fee model: docs.hedera.com . Security and participation: The network uses a proof-of-stake design, and HBAR plays a role in network security and participation mechanics as defined by protocol rules. Incentives and grants: Ecosystem incentives can bootstrap usage, but they may also obscure organic demand if not time-limited and transparent. Why adoption may not equal price appreciation Fee abstraction: Some enterprise integrations hide token mechanics from end users or pre-fund activity via intermediaries, weakening direct, market-driven buy pressure for the token. Supply schedules: If a token’s emissions or unlocks outpace demand growth, price can stagnate despite rising usage. Hedera has a fixed maximum supply of 50 billion HBAR distributed over time per its published plan. Review current circulation and unlock calendars on reputable trackers such as CoinMarketCap alongside Hedera’s official materials. Governance trade-offs: Enterprise-friendly governance can aid adoption but raise decentralization concerns for crypto-native investors, which can affect valuation multiples. Where enterprise blockchains can shine Real-world assets (RWA): Tokenized funds, deposits, and commodities require predictable settlement, auditability, and policy controls. Sustainability data: Anchoring emissions and supply-chain attestations, with transparent, tamper-evident logs. Hedera’s ecosystem has tools aimed at this use case; explore its open-source resources via the official docs . High-frequency messaging: Corporate workflows and IoT events can use low-cost consensus messages for ordering and proof of existence. Would an ETF even help HBAR? Pathways and pitfalls An ETF could lower access frictions for institutions restricted to listed securities, potentially broadening the investor base. But for enterprise tokens, that tailwind must outweigh structural headwinds like supply overhangs, unclear U.S. classifications, and weaker spot-market surveillance. ETF readiness across crypto categories CategoryPlausibility of Spot ETF (US)Key Constraints BitcoinEstablishedOngoing surveillance and custody, but precedents exist. EthereumEstablishedStaking treatment, custody, and disclosures continue to evolve. Enterprise L1s (e.g., HBAR)UncertainAsset classification, liquidity depth, market integrity, and custody breadth. Interoperability/other L1sUncertainSimilar hurdles; limited regulated market structure. Privacy coinsUnlikelyEnhanced AML/market integrity concerns. StablecoinsStructural mismatchReserve management and money-market alternatives complicate design. Will ETFs stake PoS tokens? Even if a spot ETF for a proof-of-stake asset is approved, U.S. products have tended to avoid staking at launch due to regulatory and operational complexity. That means any on-chain yield may not accrue to shareholders, limiting the wrapper’s appeal compared to direct holding. ETP precedents elsewhere Some European issuers list single-asset crypto ETPs beyond BTC and ETH. These products show technical feasibility but have historically attracted modest flows compared to flagship assets. They are useful barometers: if a non-U.S. HBAR ETP existed and built meaningful AUM and secondary-market liquidity, it could strengthen the case for broader adoption—but it still wouldn’t guarantee U.S. approval. Metrics that matter: testing the comeback thesis If the “enterprise tokens comeback” is real, it should show up in data well before an ETF filing hits headlines. Focus on traction, not tweets. Utilization and revenue signals On-chain fee revenue (in fiat terms): Rising paid usage indicates real demand. Watch trends across services (token transfers, messages, smart contracts). Active accounts and cohort retention: New address creation paired with sustained activity is healthier than one-off spikes. Transaction composition: Growth in economically meaningful activity (e.g., asset transfers, contract calls) carries more weight than spammy micro-messages. Where to look: Hedera explorers such as HashScan , official dashboards, and independent analytics providers can help build a picture over time. Supply, unlocks, and liquidity Emission schedule: Validate circulating supply today and upcoming unlock tranches using official materials and neutral aggregators. Exchange depth and spreads: Check top venues’ order books. If a medium-sized order moves the market, ETF flows would struggle to track a fair price. Derivatives structure: Futures open interest and funding rates show how speculators are positioned; elevated leverage magnifies downside in pullbacks. Enterprise traction beyond press releases Proof of write: If a partnership claims on-chain logging, you should see associated transactions on the public ledger. From pilot to production: Look for language about volume commitments, SLAs, and migration timelines. Pilots rarely move tokens; production does. RWA indicators: Tokenized funds or assets using the network, with public contract addresses, custody arrangements, and verifiable settlement flows. How to position for the narrative without overexposing ETF rumor cycles can reward speed, but they punish complacency. If you choose to trade or invest around this theme, build defenses first. Define maxima: Cap position size relative to portfolio and to the asset’s 30–90 day realized volatility. Smaller caps need smaller bets. Stage entries: Use dollar-cost averaging and limit orders. Narrative spikes often retrace before any filings surface. Mind custody: If self-custody, test a small transfer first; if using an exchange, review its proof-of-reserves approach and jurisdiction. Beware leverage: Perpetuals can look cheap until funding flips. Size so that a 30–50% drawdown doesn’t trigger forced liquidations. Separate thesis buckets: Keep a “utility” bucket (longer-term, on-chain traction) distinct from a “wrapper” bucket (event-driven ETF angle). Manage them independently. Pro tip: Create alerts for new SEC 19b-4 and S-1 filings, on-chain fee milestones, and exchange depth changes. React to data, not social posts. Red flags and realistic timelines Spot ETFs beyond BTC and ETH face heavier scrutiny. Even with strong usage, timelines can be measured in quarters or years. Keep these red flags in view: Fake filings: Screenshots or “leaked” approvals that aren’t reflected on official portals. Thin-liquidity pumps: Rapid climbs on low volume, followed by steep reversals, often accompany unverified rumors. Unlock overhangs: Large upcoming distributions to foundations, early purchasers, or ecosystem funds can cap rallies if not absorbed by demand. Regulatory actions: New enforcement or policy shifts affecting token classification, staking, or exchange operations can alter the ETF calculus overnight. Disconnects between claims and chain: If “enterprise adoption” headlines don’t produce observable on-chain writes or contract interactions, adjust expectations. None of these are unique to HBAR; they apply to most non-BTC/ETH assets vying for mainstream wrappers. A comeback for enterprise tokens is most credible when underpinned by durable, paid usage and transparent governance—not when it’s carried by the hope of a ticker symbol on an exchange. For ongoing coverage of crypto market structure, tokenization, and enterprise blockchain adoption, you can follow analysis from Crypto Daily at cryptodaily.co.uk . Frequently Asked Questions Is there an HBAR spot ETF right now? No. As of publication, there is no approved HBAR spot ETF in major markets. Any mention of an “HBAR ETF” is speculative unless you can verify active regulatory filings and approvals on official portals. What would need to happen for an HBAR ETF to be approved? Regulators would need confidence in market integrity, surveillance-sharing, deep spot liquidity, robust institutional custody, and the asset’s regulatory classification. In the U.S., you would see a 19b-4 proposal and an S-1 registration filed and accepted before listing. Would an ETF guarantee higher HBAR prices? No. ETFs are distribution channels, not demand engines. Prices ultimately reflect supply, organic on-chain usage, investor flows, and broader risk conditions. Even assets with ETFs can fall during risk-off periods. Do enterprise blockchain use cases necessarily increase token demand? Not necessarily. If fees are abstracted, subsidized, or paid via intermediaries that pre-purchase tokens long in advance, near-term market demand can be muted. Transparent, usage-linked fee models tend to have stronger token-value connections. Could an ETF stake HBAR and pass through rewards? Historically, U.S. spot ETFs for proof-of-stake assets have launched without staking, citing regulatory and operational complexities. If staking were ever permitted, funds would need clear policies on reward treatment and risk management. How can I track whether the enterprise-token comeback is real? Watch on-chain fee revenue in fiat terms, active accounts with repeat activity, contract call growth, visible production deployments, and secondary-market liquidity. Cross-check against unlock schedules and exchange depth. Where can I learn more about HBAR’s token mechanics? Review Hedera’s official documentation at docs.hedera.com and compare circulating supply data on neutral aggregators such as CoinMarketCap . Always verify details against primary sources. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

22 May 2026, 07:30

ZachXBT Accuses Kucoin of Shielding $13M in Stolen Crypto From German Investigators

Onchain investigator ZachXBT has publicly accused Kucoin of allowing stolen cryptocurrency to flow freely through its platform while refusing to cooperate with German law enforcement. ZachXBT Says Kucoin Is ‘Complicit’ The pseudonymous blockchain sleuth posted a direct broadside against Kucoin on May 22. “The team is complicit and allows illicit activity to flow as long

22 May 2026, 07:05

SlowMist Founder: Without Ethereum, Crypto Would Be ‘Incredibly Dull’

BitcoinWorld SlowMist Founder: Without Ethereum, Crypto Would Be ‘Incredibly Dull’ The cryptocurrency industry would lose much of its dynamism if Ethereum were to collapse, leaving a landscape dominated solely by Bitcoin and described as “incredibly dull,” according to Cos, the founder of blockchain security firm SlowMist. In a statement shared on X, Cos argued that while a failure of Bitcoin would likely spell the end for the entire crypto market, Ethereum’s demise would have a more contained — but still significant — impact. He suggested that if Ethereum were to fail, virtually every public blockchain running smart contracts would face similar challenges, effectively stripping the industry of its most innovative layer. The Argument: Ethereum as the Engine of Innovation Cos’s remarks underscore a growing recognition of Ethereum’s central role in powering decentralized applications, stablecoins, and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. He noted that if these sectors are not built on Ethereum, another mature smart contract platform must be capable of stepping in to preserve the industry’s functionality and appeal. “If Ethereum collapses, all public chains that run smart contracts would likely face a similar fate,” Cos wrote, framing the scenario as one that would leave the crypto space with only Bitcoin — a store of value with limited programmability. Security as the Critical Safeguard Beyond the hypothetical, Cos emphasized a more immediate concern: security. He stressed that the industry must prioritize protecting users from vulnerabilities that could drive them away out of disappointment. His comments come amid a period where high-profile exploits and bridge hacks have repeatedly tested user confidence. “The industry must focus more on security, ensuring that users are not forced to leave the space out of disappointment over security vulnerabilities,” Cos stated, linking the long-term health of the ecosystem directly to its ability to safeguard assets and data. Why This Matters to the Broader Market Cos’s perspective carries weight given SlowMist’s reputation as a leading blockchain security auditor. His remarks highlight a critical tension within the industry: the reliance on a single dominant smart contract platform versus the need for robust security across all chains. For investors and developers, the message is clear — Ethereum’s role is not just about market cap, but about maintaining the diversity and functionality that makes crypto more than a simple digital gold. Conclusion Cos’s analysis serves as both a warning and a call to action. While Ethereum’s failure is not imminent, the industry’s dependence on its smart contract ecosystem makes security a foundational priority. Without it, the risk is not just financial loss, but a future where crypto becomes a far less interesting — and far less useful — space. FAQs Q1: What did the SlowMist founder say about Ethereum and Bitcoin? Cos stated that if Bitcoin fails, the entire crypto industry would fail, but if Ethereum fails, the industry would become “incredibly dull” and lose most of its innovation, leaving only Bitcoin as a store of value. Q2: Why does Cos believe Ethereum’s failure would impact other blockchains? He argued that all public chains running smart contracts would likely face similar issues if Ethereum collapsed, because the technology and security models are closely interconnected. Q3: What is Cos’s main recommendation for the industry? He emphasized that the industry must prioritize security to prevent user disappointment and exodus, especially as vulnerabilities continue to pose risks to platforms like Ethereum. This post SlowMist Founder: Without Ethereum, Crypto Would Be ‘Incredibly Dull’ first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

22 May 2026, 06:55

Thorchain Outlines Recovery Plan After $10 Million Exploit

BitcoinWorld Thorchain Outlines Recovery Plan After $10 Million Exploit The Thorchain Foundation, the organization behind the decentralized cross-chain liquidity protocol RUNE, has publicly detailed its recovery strategy following a security exploit that resulted in the loss of approximately $10 million in digital assets. The announcement comes as the protocol works to stabilize its operations and reassure its user base after the incident. Recovery Strategy and Loss Absorption According to the foundation’s statement, the primary mechanism for covering the losses will be the Protocol Owned Liquidity (POL), a reserve of assets held by the protocol itself. This fund is designed to act as a buffer against such events, absorbing the initial financial shock. Any remaining deficit that exceeds the POL capacity will be addressed through a proportional adjustment applied to holders of synthetic assets (Synths) within the Thorchain ecosystem. The foundation noted that the exact ratio of this distribution is still being finalized to ensure a fair and accurate allocation. No RUNE Dilution Planned A key point in the announcement is the foundation’s explicit commitment to avoid issuing or selling additional RUNE tokens to cover the losses. This decision is significant for current token holders, as it means there will be no dilution of their existing stakes. By choosing to absorb the impact through internal reserves and targeted adjustments rather than market-based fundraising, the foundation aims to maintain the existing tokenomics structure and limit secondary market disruption. Implications for the DeFi Ecosystem This incident underscores the persistent security challenges faced by decentralized finance protocols, particularly those handling cross-chain transactions. Thorchain’s recovery plan is being closely watched by the broader DeFi community as a case study in crisis management. The use of POL as a first line of defense aligns with best practices for protocol risk management, while the decision to avoid minting new tokens may help preserve market confidence. However, the impact on Synth holders, who will bear part of the residual loss, remains a point of focus. The foundation has not yet provided a specific timeline for the full implementation of the recovery plan, and the situation continues to develop. Conclusion Thorchain’s recovery plan reflects a structured approach to managing a significant security incident, prioritizing internal loss absorption and avoiding token dilution. While the immediate financial impact has been contained, the long-term effect on user trust and the protocol’s security posture will depend on the successful execution of the plan and any subsequent security enhancements. The event serves as a reminder of the inherent risks in decentralized finance and the importance of robust risk management frameworks. FAQs Q1: How much did Thorchain lose in the exploit? The Thorchain Foundation reported a loss of approximately $10 million in digital assets due to a vulnerability exploit. Q2: Will RUNE token holders be affected by the recovery? No. The foundation has stated it will not issue or sell additional RUNE tokens, meaning there will be no dilution of existing holder stakes. Q3: Who will cover the losses not absorbed by the Protocol Owned Liquidity? Any remaining deficit after the POL is used will be distributed among holders of synthetic assets (Synths) within the Thorchain ecosystem, with the exact ratio still being finalized. This post Thorchain Outlines Recovery Plan After $10 Million Exploit first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

22 May 2026, 06:02

Business Expert to XRP Holders: You’re Not Ready for This Prediction By Ripple President

Crypto enthusiast Minus Wells has attracted attention after sharing comments from Ripple President Monica Long regarding the future of stablecoin payments and digital asset transactions. The post focused on a video clip in which Long discussed Ripple’s transaction activity and her expectations for the next phase of blockchain-based payments. The comments are centered on Ripple’s growing transaction volume and the increasing adoption of digital asset-powered payment systems. Long stated that Ripple has facilitated approximately $70 billion in payments through digital assets while processing around 40 million transactions. According to her remarks, the figures reflect continued institutional and enterprise use of blockchain payment technology. #XRP HOLDERS… YOU’RE NOT READY FOR MONICA LONG'S PREDICTION pic.twitter.com/pOo9JdL1zC — ᙢinus ᙡells (@MinusWells) May 20, 2026 Monica Long Predicts a Major Year for Stablecoin Payments A significant part of the video focused on Long’s expectations for stablecoin adoption. In the clip attached to the X post, she said she believes the next year could become a major turning point for stablecoin-based payments. According to Long, the market has already started to recognize the opportunity surrounding stablecoins. She explained that interest in the sector became more visible last year, suggesting that financial firms and payment providers are paying closer attention to blockchain-based settlement systems. Her comments arrive at a time when stablecoins continue to receive increased attention from financial institutions, payment companies, and regulators . Several firms in the digital asset industry have recently expanded stablecoin-related services, particularly for cross-border transfers and settlement infrastructure. Minus Wells’ post mainly emphasized the implication that Ripple’s leadership sees stronger momentum ahead for blockchain-powered payments. The wording of the tweet suggested that XRP holders should closely watch the direction of stablecoin adoption and Ripple’s broader payment strategy. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Ripple’s Payment Figures Become a Key Talking Point The payment statistics mentioned by Long became central aspects of the post. The Ripple president stated in the video that the company has facilitated roughly $70 billion in payments and about 40 million transactions through digital assets over time. Supporters of XRP on X reacted strongly to the scale of those numbers, especially as discussions around institutional blockchain adoption continue to increase. Many users interpreted the comments as evidence that enterprise-focused payment systems built around blockchain technology are expanding steadily. Long’s remarks also reinforced Ripple’s continued focus on payment infrastructure rather than speculative use cases. Over the years, Ripple has positioned itself as a company to improve global payments using blockchain technology and digital assets. As stablecoins gain global traction, many market participants are now watching to see whether the coming year will match Long’s expectations for increased adoption and larger payment activity across blockchain networks. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Business Expert to XRP Holders: You’re Not Ready for This Prediction By Ripple President appeared first on Times Tabloid .