hodler

23 Mar 2026, 17:30

XRP Price Crash Far From Over And This Move Could Send It To $0.75

The past few days saw XRP rejecting at $1.60 on March 17, and the cryptocurrency is now back to trading below $1.40, struggling to hold ground within a deteriorating technical structure that has erased more than 60% of its value since the July 2025 peak. According to a crypto analyst, the recent rejection from a breakout attempt was not just a failed rally but a warning sign that downside pressure is still in control . That leaves the price at a delicate point where one more move lower could expose much weaker levels, as low as $0.75. Rejection From The Break Keeps The Altcoin Under Pressure XRP pushed higher at the start of last week and surged to around $1.60, but that strength did not last. The move was quickly rejected , and instead of opening the door to a stronger recovery, it turned into another failed push that saw XRP fall below $1.50 and now below $1.40 at the time of writing. Notably, that price action gave some traders an important clue when it failed to hold above the recent break. That rejection matters because it came inside a much larger falling channel that has been in place since XRP topped above $3.65 last year. Every recovery attempt inside that channel has eventually rolled over, and the latest one appears to be following the same script. As it stands, the price is now approaching the lower trendline of the channel. Crypto analyst Guy on the Earth identified the area between $1.34 and $1.36 as the current line of defense. That zone is important because it combines two technical features at once: the lower boundary of the small rectangle the altcoin has been trading in and support linked to the broader descending channel structure. XRP Price Crash Far From Over According to the analyst, a clean loss of $1.34 to $1.36 would likely shift focus to $1.20 almost immediately. However, the next leg may not be orderly, and any breakdown could come with exaggerated candles and long wicks in the coming weeks. The analyst also proposed a more substantial low that’s contingent on the token breaking below $1.20. The long-term channel support line converges below the $1.00 price level and continues sloping downward. Should the $1.20 support give way entirely, this could see the XRP price fall to as low as $0.75. “It would be prudent to accept this potential scenario,” he said. However, XRP could still stage a short-term bounce from the current price, pushing back to $1.50 to retest the upper boundary of the small rectangle XRP has been trading in. At the time of writing, XRP is trading at $1.37, down by 2.2% and 7.4% in the past 24 hours and seven days, respectively.

23 Mar 2026, 17:25

Cryptocurrency Security Crisis: Ledger Co-Founder Demands Firearm Rights for Digital Asset Protection

BitcoinWorld Cryptocurrency Security Crisis: Ledger Co-Founder Demands Firearm Rights for Digital Asset Protection In a startling development that highlights growing security concerns within the digital asset space, Ledger co-founder Eric Larchevêque has publicly advocated for cryptocurrency holders to possess firearm rights for self-protection, following the violent 2023 kidnapping of his business partner. This controversial position emerges as crypto-related crimes surge globally, forcing investors to confront unprecedented security challenges. Cryptocurrency Security Takes a Radical Turn Eric Larchevêque, the former CEO and co-founder of hardware wallet manufacturer Ledger, recently made headlines with his unconventional security proposal. Speaking from France in early 2025, Larchevêque argued that cryptocurrency investors face unique vulnerabilities that traditional security measures cannot adequately address. Consequently, he believes firearm ownership represents a necessary component of comprehensive digital asset protection. This position follows the traumatic January 2023 incident where French and Spanish authorities arrested the final suspect involved in kidnapping fellow Ledger co-founder David Balland. Police reports indicate the assailants subjected Balland to physical assault during the ordeal. Moreover, this high-profile case represents just one example of increasing violence targeting cryptocurrency entrepreneurs and investors worldwide. The Rising Threat Against Crypto Holders Security analysts document a disturbing trend of targeted violence against cryptocurrency holders. According to blockchain intelligence firm Chainalysis, crypto-related crimes involving physical threats increased by 42% between 2022 and 2024. Additionally, law enforcement agencies across multiple jurisdictions report sophisticated criminal networks specifically targeting high-net-worth digital asset investors. Larchevêque emphasized this escalating danger during his recent statements. “Violence targeting crypto holders is on the rise,” he stated firmly. “We need to recognize this reality and take appropriate measures.” The entrepreneur further explained that traditional security approaches often prove insufficient against determined attackers who specifically seek cryptocurrency holdings. Self-Defense in the Digital Age The debate about self-defense rights for cryptocurrency holders intersects with broader discussions about digital sovereignty and personal security. Larchevêque specifically mentioned the need for “real weapons, such as pistols and small rifles” rather than relying solely on digital security measures. This perspective challenges conventional thinking about asset protection in the blockchain era. Security experts note several factors contributing to cryptocurrency holders’ vulnerability: Pseudonymous wealth: Blockchain transactions are public, enabling potential attackers to identify targets Irreversible transfers: Unlike traditional finance, crypto transactions cannot be reversed once confirmed Physical extraction risk: Attackers may use coercion to obtain private keys or seed phrases Cross-border challenges: Jurisdictional complexities complicate law enforcement responses Ledger’s Security Evolution After Trauma The 2023 kidnapping incident fundamentally changed Ledger’s approach to executive security. Following the attack on David Balland, Larchevêque hired a private security firm to protect himself and his family. However, he discovered that physical security measures alone provided incomplete protection for someone whose wealth primarily exists in digital form. Interestingly, Larchevêque rejected converting his cryptocurrency holdings to traditional fiat currency as a security measure. “I would not be able to sleep at night holding my life’s work in euros,” he explained. This statement highlights the deep conviction many cryptocurrency pioneers maintain about the superiority of digital assets over traditional financial systems, despite associated risks. The table below illustrates the security approaches Larchevêque has considered: Security Measure Implementation Perceived Effectiveness Private Security Firm Implemented after 2023 kidnapping Partial protection against physical threats Firearm Ownership Proposed but legally restricted in France Potential self-defense capability Fiat Conversion Rejected as unacceptable Would eliminate crypto-specific risks Geographic Relocation Not mentioned in statements Unclear effectiveness against global threats Legal and Cultural Implications Larchevêque’s proposal faces significant legal hurdles, particularly in European nations with strict firearm regulations. France, where Ledger maintains its headquarters, imposes rigorous controls on gun ownership. Furthermore, cultural attitudes toward firearms differ substantially between regions, with European perspectives generally favoring state-provided security over individual armed protection. Nevertheless, cryptocurrency communities in jurisdictions with more permissive firearm laws have begun discussing similar security approaches. In the United States, where Second Amendment rights provide constitutional protection for firearm ownership, some crypto investors already incorporate armed security into their protection strategies. However, experts caution that firearms represent just one element of comprehensive security planning. Expert Perspectives on Crypto Security Security professionals offer varied responses to Larchevêque’s controversial position. Jane Wilkinson, a former intelligence officer specializing in executive protection, acknowledges the unique challenges cryptocurrency holders face. “Traditional security protocols assume assets remain in regulated financial institutions,” she explains. “Cryptocurrency fundamentally changes the threat model by placing immense value in personally controlled digital formats.” Conversely, digital security expert Marcus Chen emphasizes technological solutions over physical weapons. “Hardware wallets, multi-signature setups, and geographic distribution of assets provide robust protection without escalating violence risks,” Chen argues. He further notes that firearm ownership introduces additional liabilities and potential escalation dangers during confrontations. The Broader Context of Crypto Violence The security challenges Larchevêque describes extend beyond individual investors to encompass the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem. Exchange executives, blockchain developers, and prominent community members increasingly report threats and harassment. This troubling pattern suggests criminals perceive cryptocurrency professionals as particularly vulnerable targets compared to traditional finance executives. Several high-profile incidents illustrate this disturbing trend: The 2022 home invasion targeting a Bitcoin entrepreneur in London Multiple kidnapping attempts against Ethereum developers in 2023 Sophisticated social engineering attacks leading to physical confrontations Coordinated threats against decentralized finance protocol founders Law enforcement agencies struggle to address these crimes effectively. Detective Michael Rodriguez of the European Cybercrime Centre explains the challenge: “Cryptocurrency crimes often cross international borders, complicating jurisdiction. Additionally, victims sometimes hesitate to involve authorities, fearing regulatory scrutiny of their digital assets.” Alternative Security Approaches While Larchevêque advocates for firearm rights, the cryptocurrency industry explores multiple security strategies. Privacy-focused technologies, including confidential transactions and zero-knowledge proofs, help obscure wealth visibility. Additionally, decentralized security networks enable community-based protection mechanisms without traditional weaponry. Several companies now offer specialized security services for cryptocurrency holders: Digital asset protection firms: Provide comprehensive security including threat assessment Blockchain monitoring services: Track potential threats through on-chain analysis Emergency response protocols: Established procedures for duress situations Security education programs: Train investors in threat recognition and avoidance These professional services often incorporate elements of traditional executive protection while addressing cryptocurrency-specific vulnerabilities. However, their high costs place them beyond reach for average investors, creating security disparities within the crypto community. Conclusion The cryptocurrency security landscape continues evolving as digital asset adoption increases globally. Eric Larchevêque’s controversial advocacy for firearm rights highlights the extreme measures some industry leaders consider necessary for protection. This position emerges from personal trauma and reflects genuine concerns about rising violence targeting cryptocurrency holders. While firearm ownership represents one potential response, comprehensive security requires multi-layered approaches combining digital protections, physical security measures, and legal safeguards. As the cryptocurrency ecosystem matures, developing effective security protocols remains essential for sustainable growth and mainstream adoption. FAQs Q1: Why does Eric Larchevêque believe cryptocurrency holders need firearm rights? Larchevêque argues that rising violence specifically targeting cryptocurrency investors necessitates self-defense capabilities that traditional security measures cannot provide, particularly given the irreversible nature of digital asset theft under coercion. Q2: What incident prompted Larchevêque’s controversial position? The January 2023 kidnapping and assault of fellow Ledger co-founder David Balland demonstrated the physical dangers cryptocurrency entrepreneurs face, with French and Spanish police recently arresting the final suspect in the case. Q3: Are cryptocurrency holders at greater risk than traditional investors? Security analysts note unique vulnerabilities including public blockchain visibility of transactions, irreversible asset transfers, and criminals specifically targeting digital asset holders, though comprehensive risk comparisons remain complex. Q4: What security alternatives exist besides firearm ownership? Professional security services, hardware wallets, multi-signature arrangements, asset diversification, privacy technologies, and security education represent alternative approaches to cryptocurrency protection. Q5: How do legal jurisdictions affect this security debate? Firearm regulations vary dramatically between countries, with European nations typically imposing strict controls while some other regions permit broader ownership, creating different security options based on geographic location. This post Cryptocurrency Security Crisis: Ledger Co-Founder Demands Firearm Rights for Digital Asset Protection first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

23 Mar 2026, 17:23

DCR Technical Analysis March 23, 2026: Risk and Stop Loss

DCR is risky at the 22.75$ level with bearish signals; 21.96$ support is critical, capital loss increases in case of breakdown. Volatility is low but BTC correlation can lead to sudden drops, stop ...

23 Mar 2026, 17:20

Traders say Bitcoin still due for ‘next leg lower’ targeting $46K BTC price

BTC price action looked weaker after Sunday's weekly close below the 200-week MA, with Bitcoin market participants bracing for lower levels.

23 Mar 2026, 17:15

BlackRock starts the week with outflow of these two cryptocurrencies

BlackRock started the week of March 23 with more than $77 million in net cash outflow from its two spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs). On Monday, the company’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (ETF) registered a net outflow of 658 BTC, which is worth about $46 million at press time. As such, IBIT recorded the largest cash outflow compared to the other issuers of spot Bitcoin ETFs, according to metrics shared by on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain . Spot ETH ETF flow on March 23. Source: Lookonchain Nonetheless, IBIT registered about 2,471 BTC in the past seven days to increase its net holdings to around 781,651, valued at over $54.7 billion. Meanwhile, BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) recorded a net outflow of 14,802 ETH , which is worth about $31.74 million at the time of publication. Spot ETH ETF flow on March 23. Source: Lookonchain As a result, ETHE investors have sold 35,041 ETH, during the past seven days, worth about $75.12 million. This fund currently holds 3,167,035 ETH, which has a notional value of $6.79 billion. BlackRock’s crypto outflow coincides with bullish sentiment The significant cash outflow from BlackRock’s IBIT and ETHE coincided with a sudden market rebound today. Bitcoin price gained over 2.36% during the past 24 hours to trade at around $70,410 at the time of this publication. BTC/USD 24hr chart. Source: Finbold Similarly, Ethereum price jumped 2.67% in the past 24 hours to trade at about $2,136 on Monday. ETH/USD 24hr chart. Source: Finbold The notable crypto rally on Monday, which was catalyzed by the announcement from President Donald Trump of a potential deal between the United States and Iran, outweighed the impact of the net cash outflows from spot ETFs. The post BlackRock starts the week with outflow of these two cryptocurrencies appeared first on Finbold .

23 Mar 2026, 17:14

IEA warns of global energy crisis as Iran war damages 40 major assets and disrupts oil supply

Chief of the International Energy Agency (IEA) announced that 40 major energy assets across the Middle East have been severely damaged during a conference in Australia this Monday. He warned that this situation, a product of the ongoing Iran war, poses a great danger to the global economy. The executive director of the IEA, Fatih Birol, issued a grave warning for the global economy this Monday as the Iran war continues to disrupt international energy markets. During a speech at the National Press Club in Canberra, Australia, Birol stated that 40 major energy assets across the Middle East have suffered extensive damage. These consist of oil and gas fields, refineries, pipelines, and more across nine different countries in the region. This news adds a new layer to the ongoing international oil crisis after Iran’s forced closure of the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for the U.S. invasion. Birol believes that the conflict between the two nations is creating a global energy crisis worse than those seen in 1970 and 2022 combined. He urged a global effort to resolve this war as soon as possible, as no country will be immune to the economic shock if it continues at this rate. Why are energy assets being targeted? The destruction of various energy assets across the Middle East is part of a broader escalation of the war between Iran, the U.S., and its involved allies. Energy infrastructure has become a key target for both sides in this conflict as an attempt to exert economic pressure. This strategy can also be seen in application with the Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz , which controls the passage of roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply. However, the destruction and disruption of global oil infrastructure could escalate into a wider energy crisis in the region if the war continues to escalate. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Iranian power plants on Saturday if the Iranian government did not reopen the Strait of Hormuz by this Monday. The Iranian government responded to this threat by vowing to destroy all U.S. and Israeli-owned energy, information technology, and desalination infrastructure in the region if attacks were carried out. How global markets are responding to the escalation The Iran war has had a rough impact on the global economy as the conflict enters its fourth week. Since it began on February 28th, oil prices have risen between 40-60% globally. Before the war, oil prices were around $70 a barrel. It has since climbed to over $100, even peaking at $115 during periods of high escalation and uncertainty. There have been pullbacks along the way, but overall, consumers globally have seen a significant rise in gas prices in just a short period of time. The price of gold, which is typically considered a safe-haven asset during times of global uncertainty, has actually declined in value by 15-18% since the start of the war. Equity markets have also been suffering, with the S&P 500 down roughly 5% in the same time frame. Cryptocurrency markets, on the other hand, have shown incredible resilience during this period of global uncertainty. Despite initial price shocks around the onset of the conflict, the price of Bitcoin and Ethereum have since outperformed both gold and stocks. Both assets have risen by roughly 10% during this time frame. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .