hodler

31 Mar 2026, 15:23

Dogecoin Soars 28% in Active Addresses: Are Bulls Active?

Number of active addresses on Dogecoin has surged to about 73,000, marking an impressive increase of 28% within seven days.

31 Mar 2026, 15:22

Ripple Taps Convera in Bid to Expand Institutional Stablecoin-Powered Payment Rails

Global payments firm Convera has entered a strategic partnership with blockchain company Ripple to launch crypto-enabled payment and treasury services. The move reflects growing corporate demand for faster and more flexible cross-border transactions powered by stablecoins. Visit Website

31 Mar 2026, 15:11

BTC prepares to close March with a net loss,

BTC is preparing to close March with a net loss, extending its losing streak. Historically, BTC has never been in the red for three consecutive months at the start of a new year. BTC extended its losing streak, poised to close a six-month losing streak. After an eventual net loss in March, BTC may go through the first six-month streak in the red since 2018. BTC is down 24.42% in Q1, still within the usual range for a mature market. Back in 2018, BTC had its first dramatic crash of over 36% at the end of the year, extending the six-month streak between August 2018 and January 2019. On the last day of March, BTC traded at $66,784.54, remaining within the range from last week. Over the past month, BTC briefly reclaimed the $75,000 range before crashing again, with no hope of recovering above $80,000 in the short term. Why is BTC extending its slide? BTC has usually been defiant, finding a period of hype to stage a recovery. The March performance was seen as breaking the losing streak that started in October 2025. The first quarter came with much more complex geopolitical conditions. The US war against Iran and the stalemate in the Strait of Hormuz elevated oil prices and tested other assets. BTC recovered only after signs of an eventual resolution. The price sank as the Iran situation proved more complicated than expected, suggesting a longer military engagement. The crypto fear and greed index also signaled extreme fear for an entire month, a sentiment not seen since the 2022 bear market. The period coincided with one of the most volatile months for oil prices . BTC has only a 1.09% net loss in March, but its price has shown that it is extremely fragile and reactive to bad news. At the same time, the asset still sees significant ETF inflows and continued purchases from Strategy. Is BTC preparing for a long bear market? The current BTC price levels signal BTC may be oversold , with the potential for a rebound. BTC is still in an accumulation zone, with some signs that whales have slowed down their selling. BTC is historically oversold, but an immediate rebounce is less likely, as traders remain extremely fearful. | Source: Bitbo A recovery or rally, however, is not immediately probable given the panic among derivative traders. BTC is still seen as an investment with a high potential upside, betting on an overall market recovery. The coin is not behaving as a store of value, but rather as a speculative tool that captures higher upside when market conditions are right. BTC is down by more than 41% from its October peak, still a relatively small drawdown compared to the more volatile market in 2018-2019. BTC had strong downside protection in the options market at $66,000 and even $60,000. The current losing streak has led to predictions of an ongoing drawdown in April. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

31 Mar 2026, 15:10

Google: Quantum Computing Could Crack Top 1,000 ETH Wallets in Days

Google’s quantum computing team has published a white paper detailing how a sufficiently advanced quantum computer could crack the private keys of Ethereum’s 1,000 wealthiest wallets in under 9 days, directly risking more than 20 million ETH. In addition, the paper introduced a timeline that researchers say no longer allows room for complacency. What Google’s Research Found To understand the risk, it helps to know how crypto wallets stay secure today. Every wallet has a private key, a secret password of sorts, and a public address that others can see. The security system currently used by Ethereum makes it essentially impossible to work backwards from the public address to the private key. Quantum computers, once powerful enough, would break that barrier entirely. According to the Google paper, Ethereum is vulnerable at five separate levels. The most direct threat is to individual wallets: the top 1,000 alone hold around 20.5 million ETH. But smart contracts, the self-executing programs that power most of Ethereum’s financial activity, are also at risk. Their administrator keys control roughly $200 billion in stablecoins and other real-world assets. Beyond that, validators who keep Ethereum’s network running hold 37 million ETH in staked funds, and the systems that support Ethereum’s layer-2 networks each carry exposure worth around 15 million ETH. The danger is not just theoretical, with Google estimating that a fast quantum computer could crack a single wallet’s private key in about nine minutes. Putting that in the context of Bitcoin would show just how grave the situation might be, especially if you recall that a new Bitcoin block is confirmed about every ten minutes. It means that a quantum attacker could potentially steal funds from a transaction that is waiting to be processed before it even clears. Crypto research group Project Eleven described this as a “mempool attack,” something the crypto community had previously assumed was far off. The Warning May Come Too Late Google’s paper puts the qubit requirements for this attack at either 1,200 logical qubits and 90 million computational operations or 1,450 logical qubits and 70 million operations, depending on the architecture. According to Project Eleven, this is a 10x improvement over previously published estimates. Interestingly, on the same day Google released its findings, researchers from Oratomi, Caltech, and UC Berkeley published separate work showing that Shor’s algorithm could run at cryptographically relevant scales with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic cubits, with ECC-256 potentially falling in five days on a 22,000-qubit machine. Nonetheless, opinion is divided on how close the threat actually is. Some analysts have argued that the danger is at least a decade away and that it will first hit the broader internet infrastructure, giving markets time to respond. But others are already setting things in motion, with Google, for example, setting a 2029 deadline to upgrade its own systems, and Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently published a quantum resistance roadmap for the network, laying out how its security systems could be replaced with ones that quantum computers cannot break. The post Google: Quantum Computing Could Crack Top 1,000 ETH Wallets in Days appeared first on CryptoPotato .

31 Mar 2026, 15:05

XRPL Validator: SWIFT Is Not Using XRP. We Don’t Need SWIFT to Use XRP. Here’s why

The global payments system is entering a decisive phase, where efficiency and speed now define competitiveness. Financial institutions no longer tolerate multi-day settlements or opaque transaction routes. Blockchain technology has introduced a viable alternative, forcing legacy systems to either evolve or risk gradual displacement. Within this shifting landscape, XRP continues to attract attention as a purpose-built solution for modern cross-border payments . XRPL validator Vet has addressed one of the most persistent narratives in the XRP space, emphasizing that XRP does not depend on adoption by SWIFT. His position reflects a growing belief that the future of finance may not require legacy validation, but rather a transition toward entirely new infrastructure. SWIFT’s Dominance and Its Structural Limits SWIFT still plays a central role in global finance, connecting thousands of institutions through its messaging network. However, it does not settle transactions. Banks must rely on correspondent relationships to complete payments, which introduces delays, higher costs, and operational complexity. SWIFT is not using XRP. Nor do we need SWIFT to use XRP. Banks and institutions will leapfrog and bypass legacy systems like SWIFT that just woke up to the idea of blockchain enabled finance. — Vet (@Vet_X0) March 30, 2026 SWIFT has responded by exploring blockchain integration and interoperability frameworks. These initiatives show intent to modernize, but they also confirm that the system must adapt to remain competitive against faster, more efficient alternatives. XRP’s Direct Settlement Advantage XRP offers a fundamentally different model. It enables near-instant settlement on a decentralized ledger, removing the need for multiple intermediaries. This approach reduces friction and allows institutions to move value across borders in seconds rather than days. Vet argues that this capability eliminates the need to integrate with legacy systems. Institutions can adopt XRP-based solutions directly, achieving efficiency gains without relying on outdated infrastructure. This model aligns with the increasing demand for real-time liquidity and streamlined financial operations. Leapfrogging Legacy Systems Technological evolution often favors leapfrogging over gradual improvement. Emerging markets have already demonstrated this pattern by adopting mobile payment systems instead of traditional banking infrastructure. The same principle now applies to cross-border finance. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Banks and payment providers can integrate blockchain solutions like the XRP Ledger without passing through SWIFT’s framework. This direct adoption path simplifies operations and accelerates the transition to real-time settlement systems. Coexistence Remains Likely in the Near Term Despite these advantages, SWIFT will not disappear overnight. Financial institutions tend to adopt hybrid models that combine legacy systems with new technologies. This approach allows them to manage risk while gradually upgrading their infrastructure. However, the vet’s perspective highlights a critical shift. XRP does not need SWIFT to validate its utility. Its value comes from solving inefficiencies independently, not from integrating into existing systems. A System Under Transformation The payments industry is moving toward faster, more transparent, and more efficient systems. XRP continues to position itself at the center of this transformation by offering a solution built for modern financial demands. As institutions evaluate their options, many may choose to bypass legacy systems altogether. If that trend accelerates, XRP’s growth will depend not on SWIFT’s adoption, but on the broader transition to blockchain-based finance. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post XRPL Validator: SWIFT Is Not Using XRP. We Don’t Need SWIFT to Use XRP. Here’s why appeared first on Times Tabloid .

31 Mar 2026, 15:02

Bitfarms accelerates bitcoin sales as it pivots to artificial intelligence infrastructure

Bitfarms is phasing out bitcoin holdings to focus on AI infrastructure investments. The company plans to relocate to the U.S. Continue Reading: Bitfarms accelerates bitcoin sales as it pivots to artificial intelligence infrastructure The post Bitfarms accelerates bitcoin sales as it pivots to artificial intelligence infrastructure appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .