hodler

5 Jun 2026, 14:09

Key levels under threat as Solana slips below channel support! What’s next for $SOL?

🚨 Solana dips below its critical channel support, putting $SOL at risk of deeper losses. 📉 Key short-term support stands at $67.48, but eyes are on the $62 to $43 range if selling intensifies. 🧐 This shift has raised fears among investors about where $SOL’s next major bottom might form. Continue Reading: Key levels under threat as Solana slips below channel support! What’s next for $SOL? The post Key levels under threat as Solana slips below channel support! What’s next for $SOL? appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

5 Jun 2026, 14:07

Blackrock Ends Bitcoin ETF Selloff as IBIT Pulls in $48M After 13 Red Days

Crypto ETF flows turned more constructive on Thursday, June 4, as bitcoin and ether funds snapped long outflow streaks with fresh inflows. HYPE ETFs extended their own winning run, while XRP returned to positive territory, and solana saw only a minor exit. HYPE ETFs Extend Winning Streak to 16 Days With $12M in Fresh Inflows

5 Jun 2026, 14:02

Pundit to XRP Holders: You Need to Hear This Now

XRP sits at $1.15 today. Several years ago, with far fewer partnerships and almost no real-world integration, it hit over $3. That gap is what crypto analyst Jesse from Apex Crypto Insights wants people to pay attention to. Crypto enthusiast and XRP supporter Mimo (@Ripple_Mino) shared a clip from Paul Barron’s show, the XRP Pod, where Barron pressed Jesse on his biggest concerns about the XRP ecosystem. What followed was a candid conversation about price suppression, strategic timing, and where the asset might actually be heading. XRP HOLDERS YOU NEED TO HEAR THIS NOW pic.twitter.com/dj5QiqKHh9 — Mino (@Ripple_Mino) June 3, 2026 The Switch That Has Not Been Flipped Jesse asked a crucial question: “I don’t understand how in 2017-2018 the price hit over $3 with almost no integration, and now we’re still at $1” after years of partnerships, acquisitions, and integrations. He told Barron that something does not add up. When Barron pushed him on whether bad actors were involved and XRP’s price was being suppressed , Jesse offered a different possibility. He suggested the low price could be strategic. Ripple may need all the infrastructure in place before activating payment corridors. Liquidity has to be established first. So, the switch, as Jesse put it, may not have been flipped yet. Barron connected this to broader macro conditions, citing a friendly Federal Reserve, potential rate cuts, and regulatory clarity as factors that could move the market. Jesse agreed that those things could help, but he was careful to note XRP may not need all of them . The Gold Question Jesse raised something more speculative but worth noting. He referenced discussions around a “ digital Bretton Woods ,” pointing to conversations about pegging assets to gold in a new global reserve structure. He brought up Judy Sheldon, a known gold advocate who has also spoken about distributed ledger technology. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 He noted that he does not know whether Ripple will “flip switches” on corridors or whether XRP gets pegged to gold in some new international monetary arrangement. He raised it as a legitimate open question, not a certainty. Barron added that nation-states are currently buying gold at a notable rate, which ties into that line of thinking. Does the Community Support this View? Responses to Mimo’s post covered a wide range of views. One user argued that no switch is coming and that the whole setup serves to extract liquidity from retail investors. Another pointed out that OTC buying keeps prices rising for institutions while retail investors sit waiting for recovery. One commenter said suppression is obvious, citing institutional OTC activity and Bitcoin dominance as the mechanism. Others pushed back, with one arguing that a circulating supply in the tens of billions naturally keeps prices low regardless of outside forces. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Pundit to XRP Holders: You Need to Hear This Now appeared first on Times Tabloid .

5 Jun 2026, 14:00

Bitcoin: As weak demand dominates, is BTC bottoming or still in decline?

Conviction fades as Bitcoin enters a loss-driven capitulation phase.

5 Jun 2026, 14:00

US House Bill Proposes National Bitcoin Reserve Using Forfeited Assets

BitcoinWorld US House Bill Proposes National Bitcoin Reserve Using Forfeited Assets On May 21, Representative Nicholas Begich of Alaska introduced H.R.8957, the Modernizing America’s Reserve Assets Act (ARMA), a bill that would establish a national Bitcoin reserve using digital assets seized through criminal and civil forfeiture proceedings. The full text, now published on the official U.S. Congress website, outlines a framework for the Treasury Department to hold Bitcoin for a minimum of 20 years, with strict oversight and transparency measures. Core Provisions of the ARMA Bill The legislation mandates that Bitcoin obtained through forfeitures be transferred into a strategic reserve and held for at least two decades. During this period, sales or disposals are prohibited. To ensure accountability, the bill requires quarterly proof-of-reserves reports and independent third-party audits. State governments may also voluntarily deposit Bitcoin into separate accounts within the Federal Reserve system, expanding participation beyond the federal level. A key forward-looking provision directs the Treasury and Commerce Departments to jointly study methods for increasing the nation’s Bitcoin holdings within 180 days, without requiring additional appropriations. Potential avenues include converting non-Bitcoin digital assets, using forfeited assets, accepting voluntary donations, leveraging tax or tariff revenue, or utilizing Federal Reserve or gold certificate mechanisms. Comparison with Previous Legislation Analysts have noted that ARMA is more measured than the earlier ‘BITCOIN Act,’ which proposed the purchase of one million Bitcoin. The new bill focuses on existing government-held assets rather than active market purchases, which observers believe improves its political feasibility. However, the bill leaves the door open for future federal Bitcoin acquisitions, as the mandated study could recommend buying more coins. Handling of Forks and Airdrops The bill also addresses digital assets resulting from hard forks or airdrops on government-managed addresses. These would be subject to a five-year sales ban. After that period, their market value would be assessed, with only the most valuable mainstream asset retained and the remainder sold, with proceeds directed to the Treasury. Why This Matters If enacted, ARMA would mark a significant shift in U.S. government policy toward digital assets, moving from passive seizure and auction to long-term strategic holding. The bill’s emphasis on transparency and independent auditing could set a precedent for how sovereign entities manage cryptocurrency reserves. For the cryptocurrency market, the prospect of a federal Bitcoin reserve adds a layer of institutional legitimacy, though the 20-year lock-up period means immediate market impact would be limited. Conclusion H.R.8957 represents a pragmatic step toward integrating Bitcoin into U.S. reserve asset strategy, focusing on existing forfeited holdings rather than new purchases. While its path through the House Financial Services Committee remains uncertain, the bill signals growing congressional interest in digital assets as a component of national financial strategy. FAQs Q1: What is the main goal of the ARMA bill? The bill aims to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve using digital assets seized through criminal and civil forfeitures, with a mandatory 20-year holding period and quarterly proof-of-reserves audits. Q2: Does the bill authorize the government to buy Bitcoin on the open market? No, the bill does not authorize immediate purchases. It requires a study within 180 days to explore potential methods for increasing Bitcoin holdings, which could include future purchases. Q3: How does ARMA differ from the earlier BITCOIN Act? The BITCOIN Act proposed purchasing one million Bitcoin, while ARMA focuses on managing already-seized assets. Analysts consider ARMA more politically feasible due to its more moderate approach. This post US House Bill Proposes National Bitcoin Reserve Using Forfeited Assets first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

5 Jun 2026, 13:50

4 Forces That Will Ultimately Decide Bitcoin's Future, Strategy's Saylor Breaks Down

With Strategy's portfolio down $10 billion, Michael Saylor reveals the 4 rival factions that will ultimately decide whether Bitcoin survives the AI rotation.