hodler

9 Jun 2026, 22:34

Treasury Stablecoin Proposal Draws Major Warning From Hyperliquid Policy Center–Here’s Why

The Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), together with venture capital firm Paradigm, submitted a joint comment to the US Treasury on Tuesday, urging the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to refine parts of its proposed stablecoin compliance rule tied to the GENIUS Act. The rule is intended to implement anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions requirements for “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” (PPSIs), a category the proposal says should be able to innovate in payment stablecoins while operating under an “appropriately tailored” regime designed to manage illicit-finance risk. Narrower Compliance, Less Burden While they did not oppose the overall goal of the framework, Paradigm and the Hyperliquid Policy Center argued that key elements of the proposal need clearer boundaries—especially where compliance obligations may unintentionally spill over into areas that do not fit the GENIUS Act’s structure or Congress’s intent. A major focus of the comments is how permitted payment stablecoin issuers’ duties should work in the secondary market, where PPSIs do not have a direct relationship with the underlying counterparties. In their view, the law makes clear Congress expected due diligence by PPSIs on their own customers, but did not intend a requirement for PPSIs to conduct additional diligence for trading that occurs in the secondary market. Related Reading: XRP May Reach $10 By 2027—But Bearish Conditions Could Push It Below $1, Expert Says The firms drew an analogy to traditional banking, saying that once regulated institutions run KYC when funds enter the system, they are not expected to monitor every spending event after cash is withdrawn. In the same way, Paradigm and the Hyperliquid Policy Center argued that decentralized peer-to-peer transfers of stablecoins—and other digital assets—should generally involve KYC only at the regulated on-ramps and off-ramps, with compliance costs focused where the relationship exists. They warned that a contrary approach could drive requirements for PPSIs to file large numbers of low-value suspicious activity reports (SARs), creating “noisy” reports with false positives that would impose costs on both PPSIs and FinCEN without clear public benefit. Hyperliquid Policy Center Urges Clarification The comment also addresses the way the proposed rule defines and assigns obligations related to “lawful orders.” Paradigm and the Hyperliquid Policy Center said the proposal defines “lawful order” by incorporating the GENIUS Act definition of “person,” which in turn determines who may have to build technological capabilities. They argued that, as drafted, the proposed rule could be interpreted too broadly, potentially pulling in developers of distributed ledger protocols, decentralized self-custodial interfaces, and other technologies that Congress excluded from the GENIUS Act’s definition of a “digital asset service provider.” The firms said this result would not align with Congress’s intent, and they recommended a clarification in the final rule to explicitly state that certain entities and technologies are not included within the scope of lawful order requirements. Related Reading: Dogecoin (DOGE) At $0.086–Two Scenarios Ahead, Including A New 32% Crash According to Paradigm and the Hyperliquid Policy Center, failing to make that clarification could unintentionally impose lawful order obligations on every validator on networks like Ethereum (ETH), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Solana (SOL), and Layer 2 systems that validate transactions involving PPSI-issued stablecoins. They argued the predictable outcome would be that US validator stakes would move offshore, US blockbuilding operations would relocate, and the US share of the chain validator base would decline—outcomes they said would undermine both the GENIUS Act’s onshoring objectives and broader US interests. Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com

9 Jun 2026, 22:22

House debates new crypto tax rules as bipartisan support lags

🔥 House committee debates new crypto tax rules in $BTC and beyond. 📊 Key sticking points include small transaction exemptions and the deferral of mining and staking taxes. ⏰ Time is running out in Congress while Senate action is lagging. Continue Reading: House debates new crypto tax rules as bipartisan support lags The post House debates new crypto tax rules as bipartisan support lags appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

9 Jun 2026, 22:20

Bitcoin Perpetual Futures: Long/Short Ratios Signal Cautious Market on Top Exchanges

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Perpetual Futures: Long/Short Ratios Signal Cautious Market on Top Exchanges Data from the three largest cryptocurrency futures exchanges by open interest reveals a nearly balanced long/short ratio for Bitcoin perpetual contracts over the past 24 hours, signaling a market caught between bullish and bearish sentiment. As of the latest readings, the overall ratio stands at 50.15% long positions versus 49.85% short, indicating no clear directional bias among traders. Exchange-Level Breakdown Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by volume, shows a slight bullish tilt with 51.02% of BTC perpetual positions long and 48.98% short. In contrast, OKX and Bybit both reflect a modest bearish lean. OKX reports 49% long and 51% short, while Bybit shows 49.7% long and 50.3% short. These minor deviations suggest that while overall sentiment is balanced, individual exchange user bases may have differing risk appetites or trading strategies. What the Data Tells Us A near 50/50 long/short ratio often indicates a period of consolidation or indecision in the market. Traders are not overwhelmingly confident in a directional move, which can sometimes precede a period of heightened volatility. The slight divergence between exchanges is worth noting: Binance’s marginal bullish bias could reflect retail trader optimism, while the bearish lean on OKX and Bybit may point to more cautious or hedging behavior from professional and institutional participants. Why This Matters for Traders Monitoring long/short ratios on major exchanges provides a real-time snapshot of market positioning. When ratios become extremely skewed, it can signal overcrowded trades and potential reversals. However, the current near-equal split suggests the market is awaiting a catalyst. Traders should watch for any shift in these ratios alongside volume and price action to gauge the next potential move. Conclusion The balanced long/short ratio on Bitcoin perpetual futures across Binance, OKX, and Bybit reflects a cautious and indecisive market. While the data alone does not predict price direction, it provides valuable context for understanding current trader sentiment. As always, traders should combine this metric with broader market analysis and risk management strategies. FAQs Q1: What is a perpetual futures contract? A perpetual futures contract is a type of derivative that allows traders to speculate on the price of an asset without an expiry date. It uses a funding rate mechanism to keep the contract price close to the spot price. Q2: How is the long/short ratio calculated? The long/short ratio represents the percentage of open positions that are long (betting on price increase) versus short (betting on price decrease). It is typically calculated based on the number of accounts or the value of positions. Q3: Why do long/short ratios differ between exchanges? Different exchanges attract different user bases. Binance has a large retail trader following, while OKX and Bybit are popular among professional and institutional traders. This can lead to variations in sentiment and positioning. This post Bitcoin Perpetual Futures: Long/Short Ratios Signal Cautious Market on Top Exchanges first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

9 Jun 2026, 22:10

Chainalysis: $36.7 Million Lost to DeFi Hacks in Six Months as AI Aids Exploits

BitcoinWorld Chainalysis: $36.7 Million Lost to DeFi Hacks in Six Months as AI Aids Exploits Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols have lost at least $36.7 million over the past six months due to hacks targeting unverified smart contracts, according to a new report from blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis. The findings, cited by Cointelegraph, highlight a growing trend where attackers focus on protocols with undisclosed source code, often exploiting vulnerabilities that have existed for years. Largest Single Incident: The Truebit Exploit The most significant breach involved Truebit, a protocol designed to verify computational tasks on the Ethereum network. An attacker exploited a vulnerability in an unverified smart contract that had been deployed on Ethereum since 2021, stealing $26.2 million. This single incident accounts for more than 70% of the total losses reported in the six-month period. Other affected protocols include Trusted Volumes, Aperture Finance, and Ekubo, though details on their individual losses remain limited. AI and Decompilers: A New Era of Exploitation Chainalysis noted that recent advancements in decompiler tools and artificial intelligence are making these exploits significantly easier to execute. Smart contracts that once required days of manual analysis by specialized security experts can now be analyzed and exploited at scale using AI-driven tools. This lowers the barrier to entry for malicious actors and increases the frequency of attacks on poorly audited or unverified code. Why Unverified Smart Contracts Are a Target Unverified smart contracts lack publicly available source code on blockchain explorers like Etherscan. This obscurity was once considered a minor security measure, but the report suggests it now makes protocols a prime target. Hackers use decompilers to reverse-engineer the bytecode, identify weaknesses, and launch attacks. The Chainalysis data underscores that transparency in smart contract code is becoming a critical security requirement, not just a best practice. Implications for the DeFi Ecosystem The findings come at a time when the DeFi sector is already under intense regulatory and security scrutiny. For users, the report serves as a warning to verify whether the protocols they interact with have audited, open-source smart contracts. For developers, it highlights the urgent need for comprehensive security audits and code verification before deployment. The use of AI by attackers also signals that security teams must adopt equally advanced tools for threat detection and vulnerability assessment. Conclusion The Chainalysis report paints a clear picture: the DeFi industry is facing a new wave of sophisticated attacks enabled by AI and targeting unverified code. With $36.7 million lost in just six months and the Truebit incident alone accounting for the majority of those losses, the message is unambiguous. Transparency, rigorous auditing, and proactive security measures are no longer optional — they are essential for the survival and trustworthiness of decentralized finance platforms. FAQs Q1: What is an unverified smart contract? A: An unverified smart contract is one whose source code has not been published on a blockchain explorer like Etherscan. This makes it harder for users and security experts to review the code for vulnerabilities. Q2: How is AI being used to hack smart contracts? A: Attackers use AI-powered decompiler tools to reverse-engineer the bytecode of unverified smart contracts, identify security flaws, and automate the exploitation process at scale. Q3: What can DeFi users do to protect themselves? A: Users should only interact with protocols that have verified, publicly available smart contract code and have undergone independent security audits. Checking for recent audit reports and community feedback is also recommended. This post Chainalysis: $36.7 Million Lost to DeFi Hacks in Six Months as AI Aids Exploits first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

9 Jun 2026, 22:09

Bitcoin tumbles by 10 percent in one week, ETF outflows hit nearly $3 billion! What is the signal investors are watching?

🚨 Bitcoin slides 10 percent while ETF outflows hit $2.97 billion. 📉 US institutional investors are reducing their $BTC positions and pressure mounts. 🕰️ Binance’s CZ calls for calm as the key question becomes whether new support will emerge. Continue Reading: Bitcoin tumbles by 10 percent in one week, ETF outflows hit nearly $3 billion! What is the signal investors are watching? The post Bitcoin tumbles by 10 percent in one week, ETF outflows hit nearly $3 billion! What is the signal investors are watching? appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

9 Jun 2026, 22:00

XRP Tests Major Macro Support As Bulls And Bears Battle For Control

XRP is testing a major macro support level that could play a decisive role in shaping its next trend. With momentum hanging in the balance, a strong rebound could signal the start of a recovery, while weakness may leave the door open for deeper losses. XRP Finds Strong Footing At Critical 0.786 Fibonacci Support In a recent market evaluation, crypto analyst CasiTrades noted that XRP has reached its major 0.786 macro support level, currently trading at $1.09 on Coinbase. The daily timeframe currently confirms the validity of this support, as the price action has respected this critical technical marker so far. Related Reading: XRP To $1 Or A Violent Reversal? Analyst Says Liquidity Setup Is Flashing The immediate focus for traders now shifts toward how the market reacts to this placement. CasiTrades identifies $1.19 and $1.27 as the primary resistance levels to monitor. As long as the asset is capped by these levels, the broader correction remains active, leaving the door open for a potential decline toward the $0.90 support zone at the 0.854 fib level. Conversely, a shift in market sentiment could render the bearish outlook invalid. If XRP demonstrates genuine buying pressure and succeeds in breaking through the established resistances, it would suggest that the market is forming a new trend rather than consolidating for another downward wave. Ultimately, this is one of the most pivotal moments of the entire correction phase. With the major support level officially tested and reached, the next few days will be essential to determining the long-term direction of the asset. XRP Enters A Critical Macro Decision Zone According to market analyst EGRAG CRYPTO, XRP is currently positioned exactly within a critical macro decision zone. The path forward is defined by specific technical thresholds that require sustained strength to validate a trend. Related Reading: XRP Long-Awaited Wave Structure Finally Unfolds – What Comes Next? Specifically, a monthly body candle close above $1.40 would suggest that the bottom was firmly established at $1.05, while reclaiming the $1.61–$1.65 range would signify the official start of a bullish recovery. A definitive break above $1.70 would provide even stronger confirmation of this momentum shift. If the price can successfully hold its ground, a double-bottom formation becomes a distinct possibility, setting the stage for a more robust rally. However, if XRP fails to hold this support and loses its current momentum, the technical setup warns that a retest of the $0.80 level is highly likely. While the upside potential remains contingent on breaking through those key resistance hurdles, the downside risk remains active if the current support falters. Traders should remain cautious, as the resolution of this macro decision zone will dictate whether the asset initiates a new bullish cycle or enters a deeper retracement. Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com