hodler

31 Mar 2026, 00:35

US senators float ‘Mined in America Act’ to boost BTC mining, codify reserve

While the US hosts 38% of Bitcoin’s hashrate, 97% of mining machines are made by two Chinese companies, according to a Bitcoin policy advocate.

31 Mar 2026, 00:34

U.S. Senators push ‘Mined in America’ Bitcoin bill to break China’s mining grip

Two U.S. senators have introduced a bill to make Bitcoin mining in America easier while reducing its reliance on foreign technologies. Bill Cassidy and Cynthia Lummis introduced the “Mined in America Act” to increase investment in Congress to establish dominance over Bitcoin mining, build local infrastructure, and form a national Bitcoin reserve. Right now, the U.S. controls about 38% of global Bitcoin mining, and 97% of the specialized mining machines are from China. That imbalance is worrisome, the senators have warned. If America relies too much on foreign parts for its Bitcoin mining hardware, a supply chain or security issue could arise. The bill would offer a gradual transition away from multinational mining equipment and allow companies to rotate so that they can be fully compliant by the end of the decade. It also mandates the certification program “Mined in America.” Mining organizations can obtain that certification at a local level with secure equipment and enough equipment to work. This is designed not only to spur overall best practices but also to increase confidence in U.S.-based mining companies. The bill will require government agencies to promote mining hardware in the U.S. as well. Bill links Bitcoin mining to energy efficiency, national security, and rural development The bill would also affect everything from Bitcoin mining to energy conservation and national security. It ties the U.S. to those opportunities through international mining equipment, claiming such equipment is unreliable or poorly received. Low costs but higher processing costs, so there was no mining hardware. The United States also imports the same kinds of materials that many countries don’t use at all; however, some could theoretically be installed at a place like the beach by foreigners. The bill also reveals how Bitcoin mining can become a source of energy, for example, to support electricity. Mining requires considerable electricity and helps regulate supply and demand. Then, mining an area of mined energy and harvesting it makes it possible for people to actually pick up energy that’s been pushed so far upstream in the supply-and-demand cycle and put it into the waste space over time. Having continued to cite difficulties in the country’s power supply, the bill calls for mining to be conducted by capturing methane emissions from oil and landfills for waste disposal. Methane is an extremely hazardous greenhouse gas, so turning it into energy for mining could also minimize environmental damage. For mining companies, meeting certification criteria could enable access to government-backed finance through existing energy and agriculture funding programs. With a large rural population, they can implement energy-efficiency projects that support growth. Bill proposes a strategic Bitcoin Reserve to strengthen U.S. Financial power and reward domestic miners The bill also aims to develop a formal Strategic Bitcoin Reserve to manage Bitcoin in the Treasury. While Bitcoin is currently in the hands of the U.S. government, mostly through law enforcement seizures, the idea is to convert it into an elaborate, long-term reserve. The aim is to see Bitcoin as a strategic asset, much like gold or oil stocks. The plan provides a framework for generating such a reserve without new taxpayer investment in the budget; the bill would explain. One might use the rewards that other digital assets may yield if seized. One example is if the government could earn money by staking or airdrops, and use that money to buy more Bitcoin. Also, we encourage U.S.-based miners. Certified firms can sell purchased Bitcoin directly to the government; only certified firms are eligible for the capital gains tax exemption. That will make it easier for miners to be rewarded for submitting Bitcoin to the Reserve at the lowest possible price. Supporters claim this move would strengthen the country’s financial situation and enhance the United States’ ability to compete in a global digital economy, where many are unable to, and the country has made little investment. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

31 Mar 2026, 00:30

XRP Holders Are Pulling Coins Off Exchanges – History Points To A Strong Move

XRP is struggling at $1.35. The market is bracing for a volatile week. And quietly, the data on Binance is telling a story the price chart has not yet decided to believe. An Arab Chain report tracking supply dynamics on Binance has identified a reading that stands out against the current bearish backdrop: XRP’s scarcity indicator has reached 0.59 — its highest level since 2024. That number reflects something specific and consequential. The supply of XRP available for immediate sale on the platform is contracting, not expanding. Related Reading: An XRP Key Indicator Just Flipped Bullish — and Most Traders Are Not Watching It Coins are leaving exchanges. Investors are withdrawing to private wallets, locking positions for the long term, and removing liquidity from the market’s most accessible selling venue. The historical context sharpens the significance. This same indicator spent months in deeply negative territory — registering its worst readings during the periods of heaviest selling pressure and peak exchange inflows earlier in the cycle. The move into positive territory, and now toward a multi-year high, represents a behavioral reversal: the sellers who were flooding the market are stepping back, and the holders who are replacing them are not selling. XRP at $1.35 looks fragile. The scarcity data says the floor beneath it is quietly being reinforced. One of them will prove correct first. The Sellers Are Stepping Back. The Question Is Whether Buyers Are Ready to Step Forward Arab Chain’s behavioral read of the scarcity data is where the report becomes most consequential. A scarcity indicator climbing to its highest level since 2024 is not just a supply metric — it is a behavioral fingerprint. It reflects who is currently holding XRP and what they intend to do with it. The answer, according to the data, is that the short-term sellers who dominated earlier in the cycle are being replaced by a different category of participant entirely: long-term holders, accumulating quietly, withdrawing from exchanges, and removing their coins from the available sell-side pool. That shift has a name in market structure analysis. It is called an accumulation phase, and the scarcity index reaching a multi-year high is one of its clearest on-chain signatures. Short-term selling pressure is declining. Investor confidence, at least among those moving coins off exchanges, is increasing. The balance of the market is tilting toward buyers. The report is careful about what comes next. The accumulation thesis holds only if two conditions persist: overall market sentiment continues to improve, and exchange supply continues to contract. If both hold, the setup for a stronger price movement builds gradually but structurally. XRP at $1.35 is the price the market is offering. The scarcity data suggest fewer and fewer participants are willing to sell it there. Related Reading: Crypto Market Open Interest Hits $30 Billion, Highest Since January: Leverage Returns To The Market The XRP Chart Has Not Changed Its Mind. XRP is trading at $1.3510, up 1.75% on the day — a green candle that opened at $1.3279, reached $1.3669, and is holding modest gains into the afternoon session. On any other chart, a 1.75% daily gain would be unremarkable. On this one, it barely registers against the damage accumulated since July. The daily structure is unambiguous and has been for months. XRP peaked near $3.90 in late July 2025 and has traced a textbook descending staircase ever since — lower highs in August, October, January, and March, each rally sold into at a lower level than the one before. The February capitulation wick to $1.15, accompanied by the heaviest sell volume on the entire chart, established the floor the market is currently defending. That defense has held. It has not yet become a foundation. Related Reading: Unknown Wallet Buys $107 Million In Ethereum – Purchase Pattern Points To Bitmine All three moving averages confirm the structural damage. The 50-day MA has crossed below the 100-day MA — a death cross on the intermediate timeframe — and both are accelerating lower toward the $1.60–$1.80 region. The 200-day MA descends from approximately $2.10, so distant from the current price that reclaiming it is a medium-term ambition, not a near-term target. Today’s candle is constructive. The trend surrounding it is not. XRP needs a daily close above $1.45 to begin suggesting the post-capitulation range is building a base rather than forming a continuation pattern toward lower levels. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

31 Mar 2026, 00:25

Crypto Fear & Greed Index Climbs to 11, Yet Market Remains Gripped by Extreme Fear

BitcoinWorld Crypto Fear & Greed Index Climbs to 11, Yet Market Remains Gripped by Extreme Fear The cryptocurrency market’s primary sentiment gauge, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, has registered a slight uptick to 11, yet the reading firmly remains in the ‘extreme fear’ territory, according to the latest data from market analytics provider Alternative. This three-point increase from yesterday’s reading of 8 offers a fragile signal of stabilization, but analysts caution that it underscores the profound caution still dominating digital asset investment. The index, a critical barometer for traders and institutions, continues to reflect the complex interplay of volatility, social sentiment, and on-chain data that defines the current crypto landscape in early 2025. Understanding the Crypto Fear & Greed Index The Crypto Fear & Greed Index provides a quantifiable snapshot of market psychology. It operates on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents ‘Extreme Fear’ and 100 signifies ‘Extreme Greed.’ The index’s calculation is not arbitrary; it synthesizes multiple market data points into a single, digestible figure. This methodology aims to counteract the emotional decision-making that often plagues retail and institutional investors alike. Historically, readings in the extreme fear zone have sometimes preceded significant market bottoms, while extreme greed has often correlated with market tops, making it a contrarian indicator for many. The index’s composition is a weighted blend of several factors. Market volatility and trading volume each contribute 25% to the final score. Social media sentiment and survey data from the crypto community each account for 15%. Finally, Bitcoin’s dominance share of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization and relevant Google search trends each make up 10%. This multi-faceted approach helps mitigate the noise from any single data source, providing a more robust view of overall sentiment. The Mechanics Behind the Metric Each component feeds into the algorithm with specific intent. For instance, high volatility, especially to the downside, typically increases the fear score. Conversely, surging trading volume during a price rally can boost the greed reading. Social media analysis scans platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit for bullish or bearish keyword frequency. The inclusion of Google search volume for terms like ‘Bitcoin crash’ or ‘buy cryptocurrency’ offers a glimpse into mainstream interest and anxiety. This composite score, therefore, acts as a thermometer for the market’s emotional temperature. Historical Context of Extreme Fear Readings A reading of 11, while a minor improvement, sits deep within a historical zone associated with significant market stress. To provide context, the index plummeted to a value of 6 during the market turmoil following the collapse of the FTX exchange in November 2022. It also hovered between 10 and 15 for extended periods during the prolonged bear market of 2018-2019. Comparing the current reading to these historical episodes is crucial for understanding potential market phases. The following table illustrates key historical Fear & Greed Index readings and their corresponding market events: Index Value Sentiment Zone Approximate Period Notable Market Context 90+ Extreme Greed Q4 2021 Bitcoin’s all-time high near $69,000 10-15 Extreme Fear Q1 2019 Post-2018 bear market bottoming phase 6 Extreme Fear November 2022 FTX collapse and contagion 11 Extreme Fear Present (Early 2025) Current macro uncertainty and regulatory evolution This historical lens shows that while extreme fear is uncomfortable, it has often represented periods of opportunity for long-term investors, a concept known as ‘buying when there’s blood in the streets.’ However, this is not a guaranteed signal and must be considered alongside fundamental and macroeconomic factors. Current Market Drivers of Fear Several concurrent factors are contributing to the sustained extreme fear reading in early 2025. First, macroeconomic headwinds, including persistent inflation concerns and higher-for-longer interest rate policies from major central banks, continue to pressure risk assets globally. Cryptocurrencies, often viewed as high-risk, high-reward investments, are particularly sensitive to these conditions. Capital tends to flow out of speculative assets and into perceived safe havens during such periods. Secondly, the regulatory landscape for digital assets remains in flux. While some jurisdictions have made strides in providing clarity, ongoing debates and enforcement actions in major economies like the United States and the European Union create uncertainty. Market participants fear potential restrictive policies that could limit adoption or increase operational costs. This regulatory overhang suppresses sentiment despite strong underlying blockchain adoption metrics in areas like decentralized finance (DeFi) and tokenization. Thirdly, on-chain data reveals behaviors consistent with fear. Exchange net flows, for example, can show whether investors are moving assets to custodial wallets (holding) or to exchanges (potentially to sell). Metrics like the Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR), which indicates whether coins moved on-chain are being sold at a profit or loss, have also reflected negative sentiment. These technical factors directly feed into the index’s volatility and volume components. The Role of Bitcoin Dominance Bitcoin’s market cap dominance, which makes up 10% of the index, is a critical sub-metric. In times of fear, investors often exhibit a ‘flight to quality’ within the crypto ecosystem, selling altcoins and moving into Bitcoin, which is perceived as a more established and secure digital asset. This can cause Bitcoin’s dominance to rise. Conversely, in greedy bull markets, capital rotates into smaller altcoins seeking higher returns, reducing Bitcoin’s share. Monitoring this dominance shift provides insight into intra-market risk appetite. Implications for Traders and Investors For active traders, a sustained extreme fear reading presents both risk and opportunity. The high volatility component of the index signals that large price swings are likely, increasing the potential for both significant gains and losses. Many quantitative trading models incorporate sentiment extremes as mean-reversion signals, anticipating a bounce from deeply oversold conditions. However, ‘catching a falling knife’ remains a dangerous endeavor, and sentiment can stay depressed for extended periods. Long-term, buy-and-hold investors often view extreme fear through a different lens. Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) – investing a fixed amount at regular intervals regardless of price – is a common strategy employed during these phases. The psychological rationale is to systematically accumulate assets when prices and sentiment are low, betting on long-term adoption trends. Historical data shows that disciplined accumulation during fear zones has, over multi-year cycles, yielded positive returns for Bitcoin and major cryptocurrencies. Institutional investors also monitor this index closely. Extreme fear can signal potential entry points for large-scale capital deployment, but it also raises flags about overall market liquidity and stability. Their actions are typically more measured, waiting for not just a sentiment shift but also improvements in macroeconomic conditions and regulatory clarity before committing substantial capital. Conclusion The Crypto Fear & Greed Index’s rise to 11 offers a faint glimmer of movement away from the deepest fear, but the classification of ‘extreme fear’ persists. This reading encapsulates the current cautious, risk-off posture of the cryptocurrency market amid macroeconomic uncertainty and regulatory evolution. While historically such zones have marked periods of opportunity, they also demand heightened risk management and a focus on long-term fundamentals rather than short-term price action. The index serves as a crucial reminder that market psychology is a powerful force, and understanding its extremes is key to navigating the volatile landscape of digital assets. As the market digests ongoing global developments, the trajectory of the Fear & Greed Index will remain a key metric for gauging the emotional recovery or further retreat of investor confidence. FAQs Q1: What does a Crypto Fear & Greed Index score of 11 mean? A score of 11 indicates the market is experiencing ‘Extreme Fear.’ It is a quantitative measure based on volatility, volume, social media, surveys, Bitcoin dominance, and search trends, suggesting investors are highly risk-averse and pessimistic. Q2: Is extreme fear a good time to buy cryptocurrency? Historically, periods of extreme fear have sometimes preceded market recoveries, leading some investors to view them as potential buying opportunities for long-term holdings. However, it is not a timing signal, and prices can fall further. It should be one factor among many in an investment decision. Q3: How often is the Crypto Fear & Greed Index updated? The index is typically updated daily by its provider, Alternative. The website and various data aggregators reflect the most recent reading based on the previous 24 hours of market activity. Q4: What is the difference between ‘fear’ and ‘extreme fear’ on the index? The index has labeled zones: 0-24 is ‘Extreme Fear,’ 25-49 is ‘Fear,’ 50-74 is ‘Greed,’ and 75-100 is ‘Extreme Greed.’ A move from 11 to 30, for example, would mean shifting from ‘Extreme Fear’ to ‘Fear,’ indicating a significant improvement in market sentiment. Q5: Can the Fear & Greed Index predict Bitcoin’s price? The index is a sentiment indicator, not a direct price predictor. It shows the current emotional state of the market, which can be a contrarian signal. Extreme readings often coincide with market turning points, but the timing and magnitude of any reversal are influenced by many other fundamental factors. This post Crypto Fear & Greed Index Climbs to 11, Yet Market Remains Gripped by Extreme Fear first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

31 Mar 2026, 00:10

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Veteran Trader Reveals Stark Timeline for New All-Time High

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Prediction: Veteran Trader Reveals Stark Timeline for New All-Time High Veteran commodities trader Peter Brandt has delivered a sobering assessment of Bitcoin’s near-term prospects, suggesting the cryptocurrency may not achieve new all-time highs until 2026. In an exclusive interview with Cointelegraph published this week, the seasoned analyst outlined a detailed timeline that challenges more optimistic market projections. Brandt’s analysis comes during a period of significant volatility for digital assets, with Bitcoin struggling to maintain momentum above key psychological levels. Bitcoin Price Analysis: A Seasoned Perspective Peter Brandt brings over four decades of trading experience to his cryptocurrency analysis. His career began in traditional commodities markets during the 1970s, where he developed charting methodologies that now inform his digital asset assessments. Brandt transitioned to cryptocurrency analysis in 2013, applying classical technical analysis principles to Bitcoin’s price movements. His track record includes accurately predicting several major market turning points, including the 2018 bear market bottom and aspects of the 2021 bull run. The current market environment presents unique challenges for analysts. Bitcoin has demonstrated remarkable resilience since its February 2025 low of approximately $60,000, yet it continues to face substantial resistance at higher price levels. Brandt’s assessment considers multiple technical factors, including historical support and resistance zones, moving average convergence, and volume analysis patterns that have proven reliable across various asset classes. Technical Indicators and Market Structure Brandt’s prediction rests on several technical observations that merit examination. The $60,000 level represents more than just a psychological barrier—it corresponds with multiple technical confluence points. These include the 200-week moving average, Fibonacci retracement levels from previous cycles, and historical volume profile areas where significant trading activity has occurred. Market structure analysis reveals concerning patterns according to classical technical principles. The failure to establish higher highs and higher lows over consecutive months suggests underlying weakness in the current trend. Additionally, decreasing volume during rally attempts indicates diminishing buying pressure, a classic characteristic of distribution phases in traditional markets. Historical Cycle Comparisons Brandt’s analysis incorporates comparisons with previous Bitcoin market cycles. Historical data shows that Bitcoin typically experiences extended consolidation periods following major bull runs. The current timeframe since the 2021 all-time high aligns with previous inter-cycle periods, suggesting that additional consolidation may be necessary before sustainable upward momentum can resume. The table below illustrates key cycle characteristics: Cycle Period Consolidation Duration Drawdown from Peak Recovery Timeline 2013-2017 ~3 years ~85% 4 years to new ATH 2017-2021 ~3.5 years ~84% 3.5 years to new ATH 2021-Present Ongoing ~50% (to date) Projected 4+ years These historical patterns provide context for Brandt’s projection. The current cycle exhibits similarities to previous consolidation phases, particularly in terms of duration and price behavior relative to key moving averages. Fundamental Factors Influencing Bitcoin’s Trajectory Beyond technical analysis, Brandt acknowledges several fundamental factors that could influence Bitcoin’s price trajectory. The cryptocurrency’s evolution as a store of value continues to progress, with increasing institutional adoption and regulatory clarity in major markets. However, Brandt emphasizes that technological advancements enhancing real-world utility will likely play a crucial role in determining long-term price appreciation. Several key developments warrant monitoring: Layer 2 Scaling Solutions: Continued development of Lightning Network and other scaling technologies Institutional Infrastructure: Expansion of regulated trading products and custody solutions Macroeconomic Environment: Interest rate policies and inflation dynamics affecting risk assets Regulatory Framework: Clarity in major jurisdictions regarding cryptocurrency classification and treatment Brandt maintains a neutral to bearish outlook on alternative cryptocurrencies, citing concerns about market saturation and the historical performance of most digital assets relative to Bitcoin. This perspective aligns with his focus on Bitcoin’s unique characteristics as digital gold rather than broader cryptocurrency market speculation. Market Psychology and Trader Sentiment The psychological dimension of market analysis forms a crucial component of Brandt’s assessment. Market sentiment indicators currently show mixed signals, with neither extreme fear nor greed dominating trader psychology. This balanced sentiment often precedes extended consolidation periods as markets search for clear directional catalysts. Brandt’s mention of potential September or October volatility aligns with historical seasonal patterns in cryptocurrency markets. The fourth quarter has frequently witnessed significant price movements, both positive and negative, throughout Bitcoin’s history. This seasonal awareness reflects the comprehensive nature of his analytical approach, incorporating multiple timeframes and market behavior patterns. Risk Management Considerations For investors and traders, Brandt’s analysis highlights several important risk management considerations. The potential for retesting or briefly breaking below the $60,000 support level suggests that conservative position sizing and appropriate stop-loss placement remain essential. Additionally, extended time horizons may be necessary for those anticipating new all-time highs, with Brandt’s projection pointing toward 2026 rather than immediate breakthroughs. Portfolio construction strategies should account for this extended timeline, potentially emphasizing dollar-cost averaging approaches rather than timing-based entries. The historical resilience of Bitcoin following significant drawdowns provides context for long-term investment theses, even amid near-term uncertainty about timing new highs. Broader Cryptocurrency Market Implications Brandt’s bearish outlook on alternative cryptocurrencies carries significant implications for the broader digital asset ecosystem. Historical correlations suggest that Bitcoin dominance often increases during uncertain market periods, as capital flows toward perceived safer assets within the cryptocurrency space. This dynamic could pressure altcoin valuations even if Bitcoin maintains relative stability. The evolving regulatory landscape presents additional considerations. Clearer frameworks for Bitcoin as a commodity or store of value may not extend equally to other digital assets, creating divergence in how different cryptocurrencies are treated by regulators and institutional investors. This regulatory differentiation could amplify performance disparities between Bitcoin and alternative cryptocurrencies. Conclusion Peter Brandt’s Bitcoin price prediction offers a measured perspective grounded in decades of technical analysis experience. His projection of delayed all-time highs until 2026, coupled with potential near-term volatility around the $60,000 level, provides valuable context for market participants navigating current conditions. While individual predictions carry inherent uncertainty, Brandt’s analytical framework—combining technical indicators, historical patterns, and market psychology—represents a comprehensive approach to cryptocurrency market assessment. As Bitcoin continues its evolution as a store of value asset, such experienced perspectives contribute to more informed market dialogue and risk-aware investment approaches. FAQs Q1: What specific technical indicators does Peter Brandt reference in his Bitcoin analysis? Brandt utilizes classical charting techniques including support and resistance levels, moving average analysis, volume profile examination, and historical pattern recognition. His approach emphasizes price action and market structure rather than relying on single indicators. Q2: How does Brandt’s prediction compare to other prominent cryptocurrency analysts? Brandt’s timeline is generally more conservative than many cryptocurrency-focused analysts but aligns with some traditional finance perspectives. His commodities trading background influences his emphasis on extended consolidation periods and measured recovery timelines. Q3: What would invalidate Brandt’s bearish near-term outlook for Bitcoin? Sustained weekly closes above $75,000 with increasing volume would challenge the current assessment. Additionally, fundamental developments like unexpected institutional adoption or regulatory breakthroughs could accelerate the timeline for new all-time highs. Q4: How should long-term Bitcoin investors interpret this analysis? Long-term investors might view potential near-term weakness as accumulation opportunities, provided their investment horizon extends beyond immediate price targets. Dollar-cost averaging and focus on Bitcoin’s fundamental characteristics remain relevant strategies. Q5: Does Brandt’s analysis consider macroeconomic factors affecting cryptocurrency markets? While primarily technical, Brandt acknowledges macroeconomic influences including interest rate policies and inflation dynamics. However, his framework emphasizes price action response to these factors rather than attempting to predict macroeconomic developments. This post Bitcoin Price Prediction: Veteran Trader Reveals Stark Timeline for New All-Time High first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

31 Mar 2026, 00:01

HyperLiquid (HYPE) Secures the Golden Cross, Did XRP Reach the Bottom? Bitcoin (BTC) Price Recovery Already Started: Crypto Market Review

Market is showing signs of recovery across multiple assets types, including HYPE, XRP and Bitcoin.