hodler

4 Jun 2026, 15:02

Ripple CEO Leaves a Message for the XRP Family

Fourteen years is a long time in any industry, and even longer in a young industry like cryptocurrencies. XRP has reached that milestone, and the people who built it are taking stock of how far it has come. Former Ripple CTO David Schwartz kicked off the celebration with a post reflecting on XRP’s origins. He wrote , “14 years ago, we got together with an idea to build a better way to move value.” He credited not just the founding team but the developers, validators, businesses, and community members who helped shape the project into what it is today. Ripple CEO Responds CEO Brad Garlinghouse joined the celebration, posting , “14 years later, still the honor of a lifetime to be part of the XRP family.” Garlinghouse has led Ripple for close to a decade . During that time, the company navigated one of the most consequential legal battles in crypto history, the SEC lawsuit. XRP emerged with regulatory clarity, a strengthened position in the U.S., and a growing list of global partnerships. Garlinghouse steered the company and the XRP army through them. 14 years later – still the honor of a lifetime to be part of the XRP family! https://t.co/CVsOSELVJW — Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) June 3, 2026 The Community Weighs In The XRP community responded with a wide range of reactions, capturing the full picture of what 14 years of holding looks like from the ground level. Several members expressed genuine pride. Some called it an honor to stand alongside Garlinghouse and the team, crediting him as a leader who has advanced the ecosystem. Some pointed to the strength of the XRP community as something worth celebrating. Other members looked ahead with optimism, noting that the best is still to come after years of difficulty. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 There were also voices expressing frustration. One member noted that 14 years of work could not send the XRP price beyond $4. He questioned what the milestone actually represents for retail holders. Another commenter stated that XRP should be at least $50 after 14 years in the crypto market. One community member revealed that he is down $3,000 on his XRP investment. He expected $4, $5, or $10 but now feels scammed. Some questioned the project’s structure, suggesting that the benefits have not been evenly distributed between Ripple and retail investors. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Ripple CEO Leaves a Message for the XRP Family appeared first on Times Tabloid .

4 Jun 2026, 15:01

BCH Perps Go Regulated: Why Legacy Forks Are Back on Derivatives Screens

Bitcoin Cash perpetuals have quietly moved from offshore-only venues onto regulated European screens . That may sound like a paperwork footnote, but it changes who can trade BCH basis, how leverage is capped, and the operational rules you must live by. In late May, one of the largest global exchanges switched on BCH perps for EEA clients under an EU licence. Soon after, contract spec pages across multiple venues reflected tweaks to funding schedules and terms. The result: legacy forks are getting a second look from desks that previously sat out. This piece breaks down what actually changed, why forks are back in rotation, and how to approach BCH perps when the venue is regulated instead of offshore. PointDetailsRegulated listingOKX added BCH‑USD perpetuals for EEA users via its MiFID‑regulated X‑Perps on 27 May 2026, offered by an MFSA‑licensed entity across all 30 EEA jurisdictions ( OKX ).Contract mechanicsOKX’s EEA X‑Perps list up to 10x leverage, 8‑hour funding cadence, and a fixed 5‑year cash‑settlement term ( OKX ).Liquidity snapshotCoinGlass showed BCH futures open interest around $480–$485M and several‑hundred‑million USD in 24h volume in early June 2026 (live page) ( CoinGlass ).Venue adjustmentsKraken lists BCH perps and updated its EEA contract specs on 30 May 2026, including funding‑rate timing changes, signalling ongoing tuning under regulation ( Kraken Support ).Why forks returnCleaner rulebooks enable more desks to run hedges and relative‑value trades in legacy assets like BCH; miners and treasuries also seek basis tools.Risk lensLeverage caps, funding mechanics, and thinner liquidity on some venues make sizing, slippage control, and stop discipline crucial. From Wild West to Rulebook: BCH Perps Under EU Licences On 27 May 2026, OKX switched on four X‑Perps pairs for its EU/EEA clients: AVAX‑USD, BCH‑USD, ZEC‑USD, and TON‑USD. The company describes these as MiFID‑regulated products for EEA users, offered by OKX Europe Markets Ltd (MFSA Investment Services Licence No. OEML‑15905) and available across 30 EEA jurisdictions. Contract specs cite up to 10x leverage, funding paid or received every 8 hours, and a fixed five‑year cash‑settlement term ( OKX ). Those parameters matter. Regulated perps typically tighten leverage, standardize funding windows, and harden the definition of “cash settlement.” The 5‑year term is especially notable: instead of “evergreen” contracts that exist in perpetuity, the documentation lays out a long‑dated horizon for cash settlement while remaining functionally continuous for traders in the near term. Elsewhere, venues are adapting mechanics for EEA clients. Kraken, which lists BCH perpetuals, updated its Linear Multi‑Collateral Derivatives contract specifications on 30 May 2026, including funding‑rate timing and other parameters — a visible sign that exchanges are tailoring product behavior for regulated jurisdictions ( Kraken Support ). A market snapshot on Kraken’s BCH perp page (20 May 2026) showed modest on‑venue activity relative to offshore markets — roughly 3.5k BCH in 24h volume and 4k BCH open interest at the time of that update ( Kraken ). Put together, these steps move BCH perps from “off‑limits” to “allow‑list” for a wider set of European institutions and professional traders who require licensed venues and MiFID‑style controls to access derivatives. Why Legacy Forks Are Back on Derivatives Screens Legacy forks go in and out of fashion, but their derivatives utility never really went away. In 2026, several currents are pulling BCH and similar assets back into view: Basis and hedging demand. With regulated venues, basis trades (spot vs. perp) become operationally viable for funds with mandates that bar offshore exposure. BCH’s correlation profile versus BTC, combined with idiosyncratic events, can set up relative‑value spreads. Miner and treasury risk management. Forked networks that retain hashrate and fee markets support miners who want to hedge inventory without selling spot. Perps are more capital‑efficient than dated futures for short‑to‑medium horizons. Index inclusion and derivatives breadth. Multi‑asset ETPs and indices often include “old guard” assets. When derivatives on these names run on licensed rails, index‑tracking desks can implement overlays more cleanly. Venue strategy. Exchanges are broadening regulated product menus beyond BTC/ETH to capture flow from professionals who want diversification but can’t touch tokens with uncertain legal status. For BCH specifically, the narrative is not about a new tech breakthrough. It’s about accessibility and tooling. Once a product clears the compliance bar, more desks can justify looking at it — not to chase story‑driven upside, but to run hedges, liquidity provision, and low‑beta relative value. Reading the Tape: What Liquidity Really Looks Like Liquidity is the hinge that swings this entire conversation. A regulated listing means little if you can’t execute size with bounded slippage. Early June 2026 snapshots on CoinGlass showed Bitcoin Cash futures open interest around $480–$485 million, with 24‑hour futures volumes in the several‑hundred‑million USD range. These figures are aggregated across venues and shift intraday, but they confirm there is real activity in BCH derivatives ( CoinGlass ). Venue‑by‑venue, conditions vary. Kraken’s own market page for BCH perps showed 24h volume of roughly 3.5k BCH and open interest around 4k BCH as of a 20 May 2026 update — a reminder that regulated books can be thinner than offshore leaders at any given time ( Kraken ). Practical implications: Fragmentation matters. If your mandate allows only EEA‑licensed venues, your effective liquidity pool may be smaller than the global headline numbers suggest. Execution tactics change. You may need to slice orders, lean on iceberg/PO strategies, or coordinate with block desks if available on your platform. Funding sensitivity. On thinner books, funding prints can swing more around snapshots. That cuts both ways for carry strategies. Pro tip: Before running basis, record one week of your venue’s depth‑of‑book and funding prints at the exact times you’d rebalance. Carry often evaporates at the roll of an 8‑hour window if you can’t execute within your slippage budget. How Regulated Perps Differ From Offshore Contracts Regulation doesn’t just change the logo at the top of your screen. It alters the product you’re trading. Here is a practical comparison to frame expectations for BCH perps: FeatureRegulated EEA perps (example: OKX X‑Perps)Typical offshore perpsLeverageUp to 10x (BCH‑USD X‑Perps spec) ( OKX )Often 20x–100x, depending on venue and pairFunding cadenceEvery 8 hours (documented in EEA X‑Perps specs) ( OKX )Commonly every 8 hours, but venues may vary and change more fluidlySettlement termFixed 5‑year cash settlement window (per specs) ( OKX )Indefinite/perpetual with rolling cash settlement conventionsClient gatingSuitability, categorization, and jurisdiction checks applyLooser onboarding for many usersContract change processFormally announced updates; examples include funding‑rate timing changes for EEA clients ( Kraken Support )Faster iteration; changes can be frequent and venue‑specificCollateral typesOften constrained; specifics vary by venue and licenseBroader mix, including riskier tokens The upshot: regulated perps emphasize standardization and guardrails. That can reduce blow‑up risk from excessive leverage, but it also means carry returns may look smaller after fees and funding, especially if execution is less fluid. A Practical Playbook for EEA Traders 1) Confirm your venue and permissions Verify that your account is onboarded under the correct regulated entity. For OKX, the EEA X‑Perps are offered by OKX Europe Markets Ltd under MFSA oversight, with availability across all 30 EEA jurisdictions according to the exchange’s materials ( OKX ). If you trade on Kraken or another platform, check the region‑specific contract specs page for the version that applies to you ( Kraken Support ). 2) Map the product details before you trade Leverage cap: plan sizing around 10x max where applicable; do not build a strategy that only works at 20x+. Funding clock: note the 8‑hour snapshots and your local time; avoid opening size just before a funding flip unless that’s your strategy. Settlement language: cash‑settled reference index; understand the constituents and potential index‑provider fallbacks. 3) Build a basis template Collect a week of spot‑perp spreads at the precise times you’d enter and exit. Estimate all‑in carry after fees, funding, and probable slippage. Stress test for 1–2 standard deviation moves around funding windows. 4) Execution controls Use OCO or stop‑market failsafes in case the book gaps. Work with post‑only/limit‑if‑touched orders to control entry prices. Keep a standing maximum slippage per leg; abort if exceeded twice in a row. 5) Compliance, tax, and reporting Regulated venues come with clearer reporting trails. Export fills, funding debits/credits, and end‑of‑day positions weekly. Many EEA jurisdictions treat derivatives P&L and funding separately for tax. Seek professional advice; mis‑categorizing funding can skew your effective return more than fees. Risk Map: What Can Go Wrong Perpetuals are leveraged, path‑dependent instruments. Here are the risk areas most relevant to BCH perps under regulated venues: Volatility and correlation breaks. BCH can decouple from BTC on headlines tied to forks, client flow, or exchange‑specific events. Correlation trades can unwind quickly. Liquidity pockets. An EEA‑licensed order book may be materially thinner than the global aggregate. Overnight sessions and holidays often see wider spreads. Funding regime shifts. Contract spec updates — such as funding‑rate timing changes cited by Kraken — can change carry math mid‑stream ( Kraken Support ). Index and settlement risks. Cash‑settled perps depend on external price feeds. Disruptions, reweightings, or exchange outages can cause temporary dislocations. Operational and compliance risk. Suitability limits, position caps, or regional restrictions can force deleveraging or bar certain strategies without advance notice. Common mistakes to avoid: Assuming global liquidity equals your venue’s liquidity. Running carry strategies without a real‑time funding ledger. Neglecting stop placement because leverage caps “feel safe.” Ignoring index methodology in cash‑settled instruments. None of this is financial advice. Perps carry a real risk of loss, including losses larger than your initial margin when markets gap. Beyond BCH: The Return of the “Old Guard” The BCH listing did not happen in isolation. The same EEA rollout switched on X‑Perps for AVAX, ZEC, and TON on OKX, signaling a broader strategy to expand regulated pairs beyond BTC and ETH ( OKX ). While not all of those assets are forks, the point is that regulated menus now include both legacy networks and newer ecosystems. For market structure, this unlocks a few things: Relative‑value baskets. Pair trades across “old guard” assets (e.g., BCH vs. ETC on venues where available) become operationally possible for regulated accounts. Risk budgeting. With defined leverage caps and funding windows, risk teams can pre‑approve position templates instead of ad‑hoc exceptions. Liquidity seeding. Once a pair is on a licensed menu, market makers can justify deploying inventory and quoting tighter spreads during peak hours. Expect a staggered adoption curve. Some regulated pairs will remain thin; others will accrue steady two‑way flow as funds discover trades that fit their mandates. The key is that forks and other legacy assets have a path back onto institutional screens without stepping outside compliance perimeters. What a Desk Should Monitor Over the Next Quarter Venue depth and spread trendlines. Track 5‑minute median spread and top‑of‑book depth during your execution windows. Funding vs. basis sustainability. If funding compresses faster than spot‑perp spreads, carry trades will underperform paper models. Contract spec changes. Subscribe to venue notices; small wording shifts (e.g., funding reference tickers, settlement calendars) can matter. Cross‑venue price leads/lags. If offshore leads regulated venues by seconds during spikes, slippage management becomes paramount. Idiosyncratic catalysts. Fork governance debates, wallet cluster movements, or exchange wallet reshuffles can create one‑off dislocations. Stay Sharp With Independent Coverage For ongoing analysis of derivatives microstructure, compliance shifts, and strategy playbooks across majors and legacy assets, bookmark Crypto Daily’s coverage at cryptodaily.co.uk . We track venue updates, liquidity shifts, and contract tweaks that alter how you actually trade. Frequently Asked Questions Are BCH perpetual futures now available on regulated EEA venues? Yes. OKX has listed BCH‑USD perpetuals for EEA users under its MiFID‑regulated X‑Perps line, offered by an MFSA‑licensed entity and available across all 30 EEA jurisdictions per the exchange’s materials ( OKX ). Kraken also lists BCH perpetuals and maintains region‑specific contract specs for EEA clients ( Kraken Support ). What leverage can EEA traders use on BCH perps? According to OKX’s X‑Perps specs for EEA users, BCH‑USD perps offer up to 10x leverage, with funding settled every 8 hours and a fixed five‑year cash‑settlement term ( OKX ). Other venues set their own limits; always check current contract specs. Is there enough liquidity to run basis or hedge inventory? Aggregated activity is meaningful: CoinGlass showed roughly $480–$485M in BCH futures open interest in early June 2026, with several‑hundred‑million USD in 24h volume at that time ( CoinGlass ). Liquidity varies by venue; some regulated books may be thin, so plan execution accordingly. How do funding rates work on regulated BCH perps? On OKX’s EEA X‑Perps, funding credits/debits occur every 8 hours per the contract specs ( OKX ). Venues may adjust mechanics — Kraken, for instance, updated funding‑rate timing in its EEA contract documentation on 30 May 2026 ( Kraken Support ). What risks are unique to BCH perps compared to BTC perps? BCH can exhibit different liquidity conditions and higher slippage on regulated venues. It also carries idiosyncratic risks tied to fork governance and network‑specific headlines. As with any cash‑settled perp, index composition and data‑feed stability matter for P&L during volatile periods. Do these regulated listings change tax treatment? They can improve record‑keeping and audit trails but do not standardize tax across the EEA. Funding payments, realized P&L, and fees may be treated differently depending on your jurisdiction. Consult a qualified advisor and use the venue’s reports for accurate categorization. Why are other legacy assets appearing alongside BCH? Exchanges are broadening regulated menus. OKX’s EEA rollout included ZEC, AVAX, and TON alongside BCH, indicating a push to offer more pairs under a licensed framework so institutions can trade beyond BTC/ETH within compliance guardrails ( OKX ). Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

4 Jun 2026, 15:00

Bankless Co-Founder Reveals New Crypto Portfolio After Ethereum Sale

Bankless co-founder David Hoffman has disclosed how he redeployed capital after selling ETH, revealing a new portfolio tilted toward VVV, NEAR, ZEC, HYPE and LIT. The move marks a notable shift for one of Ethereum’s most recognizable public advocates and has triggered debate over whether Hoffman is rotating into a new long-term thesis or chasing a different segment of the market. In a post on X, Hoffman said he “immediately took ~50% of the capital to VVV, NEAR, ZEC, HYPE” after selling ETH. The other half, he said, was held back for dollar-cost averaging into an asset that had not already moved sharply higher. “I left the rest as capital to DCA into something not already up multiples,” Hoffman wrote, adding that NEAR was an exception because it was “~1.40 at the time.” He then said he had completed that second leg of the rotation: “I’ve finished buying LIT with that remaining 50%.” Why Hoffman Chose LIT As Next Major Crypto Bet The disclosure quickly shifted into a broader discussion about Hoffman’s investment thesis around LIT and Lighter, particularly after Multicoin Capital’s Kyle Samani asked why a user would choose Lighter over Robinhood. Hoffman framed the answer around product specialization, market structure and auditability rather than simply token speculation. Related Reading: ‘Coldest Crypto Winter Ever’: Bloomberg’s Weisenthal Lists 12 Reasons “The easy answer is that Robinhood is an everything platform, and Lighter is highly optimized for perps specifically,” Hoffman wrote. “Lighter has more assets, including more pre-IPO markets. Lighter doesn’t require KYC sign up, and Robinhood Perps are for only a closed group of users in the EU.” He acknowledged one important constraint: “By contrast, Lighter is VPN blocked in the US.” But Hoffman argued that the deeper distinction is transparency. He pointed to zkLighter, Lighter’s zero-knowledge system, which he said allows end users to verify the exchange’s rule enforcement without permission. “zkLighter is fully auditable by end users, so anyone can permissionlessly verify the exchange is following its own rules,” he wrote. “Order matching, funding, risk checks, liquidations etc are defined in zk circuits, so Ethereum verifies that they followed Lighter’s rules before accepting state updates. Bullish crypto ethos!” For Hoffman, the auditability claim is not merely technical branding. He argued that it goes directly to trader and market-maker trust, because participants can verify that “there is no privileged party trading against users,” invoking the FTX and Alameda collapse as the relevant failure mode. Hoffman also emphasized latency and execution cost. He claimed Lighter has “the best latency of any perp exchange” and “the best fee structure,” while pointing to third-party comparisons against Hyperliquid. On Robinhood, however, he was more cautious, saying he could not judge Robinhood perps directly because he cannot access them and would not be able to audit them in the same way. Related Reading: Crypto Is A ‘Failed’ Asset Class, Says Renowned Economist “Maybe Robinhood, when it eventually rolls out perps, also has a 0-fee structure too,” he wrote. “But that means a tie between RH and Lighter, not a RH win.” The debate also exposed pushback from parts of the Ethereum community. One user accused Hoffman of going “from eth maxi to the other extreme,” while another suggested he had become more of a short-term trader. Hoffman rejected both characterizations. “The technology under all of these assets is pretty interesting too,” he replied to one critic. To another who joked about him having an investment thesis and sticking to it, Hoffman responded: “My last investment thesis I had for eight years. God forbid I get a new one!” Asked directly about LIT versus HYPE, Hoffman said he views the position as both “beta and alpha” to HYPE. His reasoning centered on relative buybacks, product quality and regulatory positioning, citing “LIT buybacks” as moving at “2x the relative speed of HYPE Buybacks,” alongside what he described as a technically superior product, better fees, stronger latency and US domicile. At press time LIT traded at $1.50. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

4 Jun 2026, 14:56

XRP Bear Trap Theory: Could This Be the Last Buying Opportunity Before a Violent Rally?

XRP price has fallen steadily from around $3.65 in July 2025 to about $1.20 in June 2026, leaving many investors pessimistic. Some analysts believe this could be more than just a normal decline. Visit Website

4 Jun 2026, 14:55

Outflows in Bitcoin ETFs hit $4.4 billion over 13 days! What does the record-breaking streak mean for investors?

🚨 Outflows from spot $BTC ETFs in the US hit 13 straight days and reached $4.4 billion. 📉 This marked the longest and largest withdrawal streak since ETFs launched. 🔎 The market is divided over whether early holders or leveraged trades are driving the selloff. Continue Reading: Outflows in Bitcoin ETFs hit $4.4 billion over 13 days! What does the record-breaking streak mean for investors? The post Outflows in Bitcoin ETFs hit $4.4 billion over 13 days! What does the record-breaking streak mean for investors? appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

4 Jun 2026, 14:55

Bitcoin Fund NAV Discount Hits Two-Year Low of -5.9%, Signaling Investor Caution

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Fund NAV Discount Hits Two-Year Low of -5.9%, Signaling Investor Caution The average discount to net asset value (NAV) for Bitcoin investment funds has widened to -5.9%, the lowest level in two years, according to data from CryptoQuant. The figure, reported by CryptoQuant analyst Maartunn, indicates that shares in major Bitcoin funds are trading at a price 5.9% below the value of their underlying Bitcoin holdings. What the NAV Discount Means for Investors Net asset value represents the per-share value of a fund’s underlying assets. When a fund trades at a discount to NAV, it means investors can buy shares for less than the Bitcoin they represent. This phenomenon has been observed across several prominent products, including BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust (GBTC). According to CryptoQuant, the widening discount is tied to recent weakness in Bitcoin’s price and a broader deterioration in investor sentiment. While a narrowing discount could provide additional returns beyond Bitcoin’s price appreciation, the analyst warned that the discount could continue to expand if market conditions worsen. Context and Historical Perspective The -5.9% discount marks a notable shift from periods when Bitcoin funds traded at premiums, particularly during the 2020–2021 bull market. For example, GBTC famously traded at a premium of over 20% in early 2021 before flipping to a discount later that year. The current discount level is the most pronounced since mid-2022, a period marked by significant market turmoil following the collapse of Terra-Luna and the bankruptcy of FTX. The discount’s persistence reflects ongoing caution among institutional and retail investors, even as spot Bitcoin ETFs have gained regulatory approval in the U.S. The approval of these products in January 2024 was expected to narrow discounts, but broader market forces have kept pressure on fund prices. Implications for Bitcoin Market Dynamics The widening discount signals that demand for Bitcoin fund shares is lagging behind the value of the underlying asset. This could be interpreted as a bearish signal, suggesting that investors are less willing to pay a premium for exposure through fund structures. Conversely, it may present an opportunity for arbitrage or value-oriented investors who believe the discount will eventually close. Market participants are closely watching whether the discount will trigger increased buying activity from institutional investors seeking to capitalize on the gap. However, the risk of further widening remains, particularly if Bitcoin’s price continues to face headwinds from macroeconomic factors such as interest rate policy or regulatory developments. Conclusion The -5.9% NAV discount across Bitcoin funds represents a two-year low and underscores cautious investor sentiment amid Bitcoin price weakness. While the discount could offer additional returns if it narrows, the potential for further widening remains a key risk. Investors should monitor both Bitcoin price action and fund-specific dynamics to assess whether the discount presents a buying opportunity or a signal of deeper market concern. FAQs Q1: What is a Bitcoin fund NAV discount? A NAV discount occurs when a fund’s market price is lower than the value of its underlying Bitcoin holdings. A -5.9% discount means the fund trades at 5.9% below its net asset value. Q2: Which Bitcoin funds are affected by this discount? The discount has been observed across major products, including BlackRock’s IBIT and Grayscale’s GBTC, though the extent may vary by fund. Q3: Why does the NAV discount matter to investors? A discount can offer investors a chance to buy Bitcoin exposure at a lower effective price. However, a widening discount may signal weak demand or bearish sentiment, and the discount could increase further before narrowing. This post Bitcoin Fund NAV Discount Hits Two-Year Low of -5.9%, Signaling Investor Caution first appeared on BitcoinWorld .