hodler

30 May 2026, 21:24

Ethereum defends the 2,000 dollar barrier! What do experts expect next?

🚨 Ethereum defends the 2,000 dollar mark amid volatility. Short-term market sentiment is mixed and buyers remain cautious. Continue Reading: Ethereum defends the 2,000 dollar barrier! What do experts expect next? The post Ethereum defends the 2,000 dollar barrier! What do experts expect next? appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

30 May 2026, 21:06

Chainlink jumps 2.7 percent to $9.19 after sharp slide

🚀 $LINK has rebounded 2.7% in one day, reaching $9.19. Trading volume remains over $286 million as buyers step in. ⚡️Critical data: $LINK is still down 82% from its record high. Continue Reading: Chainlink jumps 2.7 percent to $9.19 after sharp slide The post Chainlink jumps 2.7 percent to $9.19 after sharp slide appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

30 May 2026, 20:30

Alephium token bridge exploited for $815K as hackers mint millions of unbacked ALPH

Hackers have drained approximately $815,000 from Alephium’s Token Bridge on Ethereum. They minted 13.76 million wrapped ALPH tokens from forged transactions, prompting the project to warn liquidity providers to pull their funds immediately. This exploit adds to the increasing number of bridge attacks that have occurred in May. The Verus-Ethereum bridge lost around $11.5 million in an attack on May 18, while Cryptopolitan reported earlier on May 30 that Gravity Bridge lost $5.4 million, the same day Alephium’s TokenBridge suffered an exploit. What made the attack successful? Blockchain security firm Blockaid detected the exploit and reported that the attacker compromised three of four guardian keys protecting the bridge. Upon gaining control of a signing majority, the attacker forged Verified Action Approvals (VAAs), the cryptographic messages that authorize cross-chain transfers. According to Blockaid, the entire operation took roughly seven minutes. The attacker used the forged VAAs to mint 13.76 million wrapped ALPH, which is reportedly more than 100% of the token’s prior wrapped supply. Additional assets, including USDT, USDC, WBTC, and WETH, were unlocked from the bridge’s custody contract. On-chain analyst Specter flagged that the attack hit both the Ethereum and BNB Chain bridge contracts. Specter stated that the attacker then moved stolen funds from BNB Chain to Ethereum, and a portion has already been deposited into Tornado Cash, according to Specter’s analysis posted on X. Alephium denies guardian key compromise However, Alephium has provided further updates disputing the Blockaid’s submission, stating, “The exploit was NOT caused by a compromise of the guardian keys, contrary to some early external reports.” According to the protocol, the exploit was “caused by an offchain vulnerability in the bridge backend that could be triggered in specific edge cases.” Alephium gave a breakdown of the funds that were drained across Ethereum and BNB, stating that 200,967 USDT, 17,594 USDC, 5.18 WETH, and 0.335 WBTC were taken from the former, while 36,750 USDT and 24.386 WBNB were taken from BNB. Alephium tells LPs to withdraw Alephium also warned anyone providing liquidity to ALPH pools on Uniswap or PancakeSwap. In a follow-up update, the platform gave a comprehensive reason why it asked users to withdraw liquidity, stating , “Because the bridge has been shut down, the attacker cannot redeem or bridge these wrapped ALPH back through the Alephium bridge. We therefore ask users not to provide liquidity to ALPH pools on Ethereum or BNB Chain, to withdraw any existing liquidity, and not to swap against these pools,” adding that “Additional liquidity or trading activity would increase the attacker’s ability to realize value from the unauthorized wrapped ALPH.” ALPH is currently trading at $0.037 with a market capitalization of over $5 million, while the total value locked (TVL) across Alephium’s DeFi protocols sat at approximately $756,000, and it has over $308,000 as bridged TVL, per DefiLlama data . The Alephium team has stated that they are currently focusing on recovery and remediation efforts and promised to share more updates in the coming week. A brutal month for bridges The Alephium exploit adds to what has become a punishing stretch for cross-chain infrastructure. The Gravity Bridge hack , also reported the same day, saw $5.4 million drained through what on-chain analysts suspect was a contract key compromise, according to Cryptopolitan’s reporting. About two weeks earlier, the Verus-Ethereum bridge lost $11.5 million in a verification bypass exploit, according to DefiLlama’s hacks database. THORChain also suffered a $10 million coordinated attack across Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Base on May 15, as reported by Cryptopolitan. Cross-chain bridges have seen increased attacks from bad actors recently, and they have collectively lost over $326 million in 2026 alone as of mid-May. Bridge protocols account for $3.2 billion of the $16.6 billion in total value hacked across crypto history, according to DefiLlama, a disproportionate share given the relatively small number of bridge protocols compared to other DeFi categories. The persistent vulnerability of these platforms and the growing frequency of attacks from April into May have made the pattern difficult to ignore. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .

30 May 2026, 20:27

Expert Says Bitcoin Miners Are Expanding Beyond Mining Into Energy Infrastructure

The Bitcoin network received a fresh difficulty bump this week at block height 951552, with the protocol dialing things up by 1.72%. Meanwhile, the network’s hashrate kept flexing its muscles, climbing past the 1,000 exahash per second (EH/s), or 1 zettahash per second (ZH/s) threshold. Bitcoin Difficulty Nears 139 Trillion and Sees Industry Transformation Bitcoin’s

30 May 2026, 20:10

Circle freezes Zama's cUSDC contract after Overnight Finance funds flow into privacy wrapper

Zama’s co-founder Rand Hindi, has clarified that the blacklist placed by Circle on the protocol’s contract address had nothing to do with Zama at all. Reports show that approximately $12.6 million in user funds were locked in Zama’s confidential USDC token on Ethereum. Why was Zama’s contract frozen? Following reports that $12.6 million in user funds on Zama have become inaccessible, the company’s co-founder, Rand Hindi, took to X to give an explanation. He also gave credit to on-chain investigator ZachXBT for his role in identifying the source of the problem. The story goes that an address linked to the Overnight Finance hack had deposited more than $12.5 million USDC into Zama’s cUSDC wrapper. However, as the wrapper was not so popular at the time, that single deposit represented nearly 100% of all the funds in the contract. “This has nothing to do with Zama, or privacy,” Hindi insisted on X. “The issue stems from an address related to the Overnight Finance hack.” The USDT/USDC Ban List Telegram tracker shows that Zama’s contract address was frozen at 01:08 UTC on Friday. The targeted address, 0xe978…72B2, is publicly labeled on Etherscan as “Zama: cUSDC Token.” Why did Circle’s ban affect uninvolved users? Circle’s compliance system flagged the depositor’s wallet, but because those funds sat inside Zama’s cUSDC contract, a standard holding freeze was applied to the entire contract address rather than just the individual depositor. ZAMA’s token dropped by 18.2% intraday, falling from around $0.039 to $0.032 over roughly five and a half hours. Trading volume spiked to 61% in 24 hours to $73.9 million, nearly matching the token’s $77.5 million market cap. The token partially recovered to $0.035, but that’s still less than its value prior to the freeze. Hindi emphasized that the protocol “is not a mixer” and does not obscure senders or recipients, only balances and amounts. He pointed out the depositor’s cUSDC transaction history on Blockscout as evidence that transactions remain traceable. As an immediate precaution, Zama paused its cUSDC, cUSDT, and cWETH contracts pending a full investigation. Hindi said the team would publish a post-mortem and a framework for handling future freeze requests. If Zama’s legal team fails to convince Circle or the court that issued the restraining order to narrow the freeze to the specific flagged depositor, legitimate users who deposited USDC into cUSDC will remain locked out. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

30 May 2026, 20:02

The Institutional Math Behind $100-$300 XRP Just Got Very Real

A $100, $200, or $300 XRP price target sounds extreme to most retail investors. However, the institutional math behind it does not. Federal Reserve policy, new legislation, on-chain data, and FX market numbers are converging in a way that a growing number of serious market participants are treating as credible. Crypto expert Ripple Bull Winkle (@RipBullWinkle) believes that the people who have studied these systems the longest are quietly accumulating. While retail investors continue to treat $100+ XRP as speculation, the institutional positioning tells a different story. The institutional math behind $100-$300 XRP just got very real. Most retail still thinks this is impossible. Wall Street clearly doesn't agree. $XRP pic.twitter.com/RVwf5fxjZI — Ripple Bull Winkle | Crypto Researcher (@RipBullWinkle) May 29, 2026 The Building Blocks of the Institutional Argument Ripple Bull Winkle pointed to several converging factors. Federal Reserve policy, new legislation, on-chain data, and FX market numbers all form the basis of his case. Each element contributes to a structure that, in his view, makes a triple-digit valuation a realistic destination rather than a fantasy. The Senate Banking Committee advanced the CLARITY Act on May 14, 2026, sending the crypto market structure bill to the full Senate floor. The bill aims to define how digital assets are regulated in the U.S. That level of legislative progress gives institutions a clearer path to allocate into digital assets like XRP with confidence. The FX Market Numbers The foreign exchange market processes trillions of dollars in volume daily. XRP was designed to operate in that space, specifically to replace the correspondent banking system that currently ties up liquidity in nostro and vostro accounts worldwide. Ripple Bull Winkle described the math behind $100 and $300 XRP as something that “is starting to work out.” At current circulating supply levels, $100 XRP represents a market cap in the trillions, and many critics cite that number as the barrier . Proponents cite the size of the FX market itself, which entirely dwarfs current crypto market caps, as the justification. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Institutions Can See the Potential Ripple Bull Winkle stated that the people who have studied XRP the longest are not dismissing these price levels. Instead, they are accumulating , and that behavioral signal is notable. Institutional investors do not publicly announce their positioning. They build it quietly, before conviction becomes consensus. The combination of a defined use case, regulatory progress, on-chain accumulation data, and macro liquidity conditions has moved the $100 to $300 XRP price conversation out of retail forums and into serious institutional analysis. What This Means for XRP Ripple Bull Winkle’s argument is structural and does not have a specific date attached. The infrastructure being built around XRP, the institutions involved in building it, and the developments that have surfaced all contribute to the case for a $300 XRP Price . Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post The Institutional Math Behind $100-$300 XRP Just Got Very Real appeared first on Times Tabloid .