hodler

28 May 2026, 10:02

New Fed Chairman’s Bombshell XRP Statement Stuns XRP Army

OpenfindAI founder Tom recently drew attention to a section of an academic publication that references XRP as part of a possible framework for cross-border liquidity between stablecoins and national currencies. The post focused on a paper co-authored by Kevin Warsh, the new Chairman of the Federal Reserve , suggesting that the document reflects growing institutional recognition of private-sector digital asset infrastructure. Tom shared screenshots from the 2022 publication Digital Currencies: The US, China, and the World at a Crossroads, edited by Darrell Duffie and Elizabeth Economy. The highlighted section discusses how future international payment systems could use stablecoins and private digital assets to facilitate currency conversion and cross-border settlements. The new @federalreserve Chairman (Kevin Warsh) co-authored a paper naming $XRP as a liquidity solution between stablecoins This paper explicitly states that private sector infrastructure should NOT be ruled out in future digital money systems This is proof that private… https://t.co/hVSp8DEEdp pic.twitter.com/XoWU6etlDP — Tom (@Tom0nChain) May 26, 2026 Paper References XRP in the Cross-Border Payment Context The highlighted passage in the paper states that “any national currency could thus be convertible into any other national currency in two steps via the stablecoin.” It further explains that such a framework would resemble “the cross-border payments system that Ripple currently operates with its XRP cryptocurrency.” The paper also notes that multicurrency corridors “should not rule out the use of regulated private stablecoins or cryptocurrencies,” while acknowledging that these systems may require additional regulation. Tom emphasized this section in his X post and argued that the wording shows increased acceptance of private infrastructure providers within discussions about the future of digital finance. According to Tom, the reference to XRP in an academic and policy-oriented publication linked to Kevin Warsh is significant because it presents Ripple’s infrastructure as an example of how future digital money systems could operate. He wrote that private infrastructure providers such as Ripple are becoming “critical components of the financial system.” Ripple’s Long-Term Positioning Highlighted Tom’s post also focused on Ripple’s long-term strategy in the digital payments sector. He argued that Ripple is among the few companies that have spent years positioning itself for the possible integration of blockchain-based settlement systems into global finance. The screenshots attached to the post showed the publication’s contributor page, which included Kevin Warsh among several notable economists, policymakers, and financial experts. Tom used this detail to support his broader claim that XRP and Ripple are increasingly appearing in institutional-level discussions about digital currency infrastructure. The post framed the paper as evidence that policymakers and financial researchers are examining systems that combine public and private digital currency solutions rather than excluding private companies from future monetary frameworks. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Community Reactions Focus on Stablecoin Adoption One response highlighted by Tom came from X user Jay Nisbett, who connected the paper’s statements to recent developments in Japan. Nisbett wrote that on June 1, Japan would adopt foreign privately issued stablecoins as par value for government payments, effectively treating them similarly to fiat currency in specific contexts. He added that this policy direction aligns with the paper’s statement about regulated private stablecoins and cryptocurrencies serving within multicurrency payment corridors. The conversation surrounding the post centered largely on the possibility that governments and financial institutions may increasingly incorporate regulated private blockchain infrastructure into international payment systems. Tom’s thread presented Ripple and XRP as examples of technology already operating within that framework while broader policy discussions continue around stablecoins, digital currencies, and cross-border liquidity solutions. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post New Fed Chairman’s Bombshell XRP Statement Stuns XRP Army appeared first on Times Tabloid .

28 May 2026, 10:00

Solana (SOL) And Bittensor (TAO): As Solana Perp Volumes Rebound And TAO Secures More AI‑Network Integrations, Do SOL And TAO Form The Core “Trading + AI Infra”...

The market is attempting to identify the dominant structural pairs for the next leg of the cycle. Two primary narratives are fighting for capital dominance: high-speed, on-chain execution and decentralized artificial intelligence infrastructure. Solana (SOL) remains the undisputed leader for high-frequency trading, currently seeing a massive rebound in perpetual futures and DEX volumes. In parallel, Bittensor (TAO) is rapidly establishing itself as the preeminent AI-network layer, securing critical integrations for model sharing and decentralized compute. The fundamental question for allocators is whether these two assets are beginning to couple into a unified "Trading + AI Infra" core stack, or if they are destined to remain entirely parallel, rotational narratives. A dive into their 30-day technical structures reveals exactly how the market is treating them. Solana (SOL): High‑Speed Trading Leg In A Broad Range Source: tradingview Solana 's current 30-day structural profile is textbook behavior for an asset undergoing mid-range consolidation following a massive run. Trading slightly below its 30-day SMA ($170) but well above its 200-day SMA ($145–$150), SOL is digesting its recent moves. The Fibonacci Map ($140 to $190): 23.6% Retracement: ~$151.80 38.2% Retracement: ~$159.10 50.0% Retracement: ~$165.00 61.8% Retracement: ~$170.90 Immediate Support: $159.00 to $165.00: SOL is currently resting directly on the 50% retracement line ($165.00). This block serves as the immediate "balance" zone. Losing the $159.00 floor would inevitably push SOL back toward the lower band. $140.00 to $152.00: The "deeper reset" zone, capturing the 23.6% Fib and the 30-day swing low. A daily close under $140.00 would confirm that the entire run to $190 has been fully unwound. Immediate Resistance: $171.00 to $180.00: The critical overhead block. This zone features a tight cluster of the 61.8% retracement ($170.90) and the 30-day SMA (~$170.00). A sustained push through $175.00 and $180.00 signals that perp and spot flow traders are actively willing to pay a premium again. $185.00 to $190.00+: The recent local high. Consistent daily closes and consolidation above $190.00 are required to mark the definitive start of a new cyclical leg. The Read: SOL is firmly mid-range in a $140–$190 box, balanced perfectly on its 50% Fib support. To cement its role as the dominant "trading" half of a core pair, it must vigorously defend the $159–$165 dips, reclaim the $171–$180 cluster, and turn the $190 ceiling into a new consolidation floor. Bittensor (TAO): AI‑Network Beta In Lower Half Of Range Source: tradingview As the AI-network model-sharing leg, TAO is structurally more volatile than SOL and highly sensitive to the ebb and flow of the broader artificial intelligence narrative. It is currently situated in the lower half of its 30-day range, reflecting a "mid-down-leg" posture. The Fibonacci Map ($240 to $320): 23.6% Retracement: ~$258.90 38.2% Retracement: ~$270.60 50.0% Retracement: ~$280.00 61.8% Retracement: ~$289.40 Immediate Support: $259.00 to $266.00: TAO is leaning heavily on this shallow support band, hovering just above the 23.6% retracement ($258.90). Holding this precise zone is vital; it signals that the broader $240 to $320 move remains at least partially intact. $240.00 to $245.00: The 30-day swing low. A daily close below $240.00 is a severe structural warning, signaling a deeper AI-infra de-risking that points directly toward the low-$200s. Immediate Resistance: $271.00 to $280.00: The primary "trend repair" ceiling. This band contains the 38.2% and 50% Fib levels, directly capped by the 30-day SMA near $280.00. TAO must reclaim this block and use it as a floor to prove that recent AI integrations are translating into sustained economic demand. $289.00 to $320.00+: The 61.8% level and the local high. Pushing into the $300+ territory on heavy volume without immediate rejection is the first technical confirmation of a fresh AI-infra leg. The Read: TAO is structurally weaker than SOL in the short term, trading clearly beneath its 30-day mean. To act as the "AI-infra" half of a core pair, it must defend the $259–$266 line, grind back into the $271–$280 block, and eventually push $300 on the back of active network usage (miners, validators, model buyers), rather than relying purely on news headlines. Conclusion: Core Pair Or Parallel Trades? The structural maps indicate that both assets are currently consolidating, with SOL holding stronger mid-range levels while TAO leans on its lower support boundaries. They Form the Core “Trading + AI Infra” Pair If: SOL holds the $159–$165 balance zone, reclaims $171–$180, and begins pressing the $190 ceiling as Solana DEX and perp volumes consistently rank at the top of on-chain venues. TAO rigorously defends the $259–$266 floor, reclaims the $271–$280 resistance block, and makes sustained attempts at $300 as AI-network integrations translate into actual organic usage. Institutional flow data and market narratives explicitly begin coupling "Trading on SOL, AI on TAO" as a unified portfolio allocation strategy. They Keep Trading In Parallel Narratives If: SOL continues coiling aimlessly between $150 and $180, repeatedly failing near $190 as it is forced to share trading liquidity with Arbitrum, Base, and centralized exchanges. TAO remains stuck in the $240–$280 zone, struggling to clear its 30-day moving average, with volume only spiking on integration announcements before quickly fading. The market continues to treat them as entirely separate, rotational high-beta plays, jumping into Solana purely for execution and into TAO strictly for isolated AI speculation. Final Verdict: The Fibonacci and moving average structures are clear, outlining precise "make or break" levels for both assets. However, whether they break upward to establish a unified market leadership dynamic depends entirely on Solana maintaining its execution volume dominance, and Bittensor proving that its AI infrastructure generates sticky, sustained economic demand. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

28 May 2026, 10:00

‘All Of DeFi Unsafe,’ Developer Warns As AI Agents Reshape Security Threats

Attackers drained an estimated $200,000 from DeFi liquidity pools on Ethereum — specifically Uniswap V3 — after exploiting weaknesses in the WUSD.fi and GLOVE incentive system, according to security researchers at ExVul. The attackers cycled funds through multiple wallets to repeatedly farm rewards, taking advantage of flaws baked into the protocol’s incentive structure. A Wave Of Attacks Hitting The Ecosystem That incident was one of several to rock the DeFi space in recent days. Fraudulent Google advertisements impersonating Uniswap also surfaced earlier this week, routing unsuspecting users to phishing sites designed to steal wallet credentials — a scam that reports say drained at least $400,000 before it was flagged. The back-to-back incidents set the stage for a blunt public warning from Manuel Aráoz, the founder of OpenZeppelin , one of the most widely used smart contract security firms in the industry. Aráoz said he now considers all of DeFi unsafe , a statement that spread quickly across developer circles after he posted it online. His reasoning cuts to a basic problem in how blockchain security works. Defenders have to find and patch every single vulnerability, while an attacker only needs one to drain a protocol entirely. PSA: I now consider *all* of DeFi unsafe. Coding agents are superhuman at finding vulnerabilities, and smart contract security is too asymmetric: defenders need to fix every bug while attackers need just one exploit to steal funds. — Manuel Aráoz (@maraoz) May 26, 2026 AI Tools Shifting The Balance Aráoz pointed to AI-powered coding tools as the reason that balance has gotten harder to manage. Reports indicate he believes these tools allow attackers to scan contracts for weaknesses at a speed and scale that most security teams cannot match. He went further in private communications, reportedly advising friends and family to pull their funds from major DeFi platforms altogether, including Aave, MakerDAO, and Compound. Those three platforms represent a significant share of total value locked across decentralized finance. Cybersecurity analysts have raised similar concerns, warning that AI is accelerating how fast attackers can map out vulnerabilities, build phishing infrastructure, and run simulated exploit strategies against live protocols. Complexity Making Defense Harder The problem is compounded by how modern DeFi protocols are built. Many now stack multiple components on top of each other — bridges, lending systems, staking mechanisms, automated reward contracts — and each additional layer widens the surface area that has to be defended. OpenZeppelin itself previously flagged how dangerous these combinations can be, identifying a vulnerability that emerged from the interaction between ERC-2771 and Multicall standards, two widely used contract types that created unintended exposure when used together. Major protocols have responded by pouring resources into audits, bug bounty programs, and formal verification. Reports note that even those efforts have not fully closed the door on phishing attacks and incentive manipulation schemes. The concern now is whether smaller DeFi projects — those without the budget for continuous security reviews — can hold up against attackers who are moving faster than before. Featured image from Binance, chart from TradingView

28 May 2026, 10:00

Ethereum broke KEY support, retail says ‘buy the dip’ – But whales say…

ETH’s $2k breakdown has traders watching whether crowd optimism turns into another trap.

28 May 2026, 10:00

Grayscale: Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain Poised to Lead as US Crypto Rules Clarify

BitcoinWorld Grayscale: Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain Poised to Lead as US Crypto Rules Clarify Digital asset manager Grayscale has identified Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), BNB Chain (BNB), and the Canton Network (CC) as the primary digital assets likely to attract institutional capital as regulatory clarity for cryptocurrencies expands in the United States. In a recent research report, Grayscale analysts highlighted that the proposed CLARITY Act and evolving guidelines from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are expected to accelerate growth in tokenized asset markets and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols. Key beneficiaries of regulatory shifts Grayscale’s report, released this week, outlines a scenario where clearer rules around digital asset classification and custody reduce uncertainty for institutional investors. The firm notes that Ethereum, with its established smart contract ecosystem and ongoing upgrades, is well-positioned to serve as the foundational layer for tokenized securities and DeFi applications. Solana and BNB Chain, known for higher throughput and lower transaction costs, could benefit from increased activity in scalable DeFi and tokenization projects. The Canton Network, a newer entrant focused on privacy and interoperability, was also singled out for its potential in institutional-grade asset tokenization. Beyond these four, Grayscale mentioned Avalanche (AVAX), Base, Arbitrum (ARB), Hyperliquid (HYPE), and Tron (TRX) as secondary beneficiaries. The firm also suggested that Bitcoin (BTC) could see gains, positioning it as one of the safest collateral assets in a regulated environment. What the CLARITY Act and SEC guidelines mean The CLARITY Act, if passed, would provide a federal framework for determining whether a digital asset is a commodity or a security, a distinction that has long created legal ambiguity. Combined with SEC guidance on custody, staking, and token offerings, the regulatory landscape could become more predictable for banks, hedge funds, and asset managers looking to allocate capital to crypto markets. Grayscale’s analysis suggests that tokenized real-world assets—such as bonds, real estate, and commodities—could see significant growth under these conditions, with Ethereum and Solana serving as primary settlement layers. The report also notes that DeFi protocols on BNB Chain and Avalanche may attract liquidity as compliance requirements become clearer. Why this matters for investors For institutional investors, regulatory clarity is often a prerequisite for large-scale allocation. The current uncertainty has kept many traditional financial firms on the sidelines, limiting capital inflows. If the CLARITY Act advances and the SEC provides clear guidelines, the market could see a wave of new products, including tokenized funds, regulated DeFi platforms, and crypto-backed lending services. Grayscale’s analysis provides a roadmap for which blockchain networks might capture the most value in this evolving environment. Conclusion Grayscale’s report underscores a pivotal moment for the U.S. crypto industry. As lawmakers and regulators move toward clearer frameworks, established networks like Ethereum and Solana, along with emerging platforms like Canton, could become the primary beneficiaries. The report serves as a strategic indicator for investors monitoring regulatory developments and their potential market impact. FAQs Q1: What is the CLARITY Act? The CLARITY Act is a proposed U.S. federal law that aims to define whether digital assets are classified as commodities or securities, reducing legal ambiguity for issuers and investors. Q2: Why does Grayscale think Ethereum and Solana will benefit most? Grayscale cites Ethereum’s established smart contract infrastructure and Solana’s high throughput and low costs as key advantages for tokenization and DeFi applications under a clearer regulatory regime. Q3: Could Bitcoin also gain from regulatory clarity? Yes. Grayscale notes that Bitcoin, as the most widely recognized digital asset, could serve as a safe collateral asset in regulated markets, potentially attracting institutional demand. This post Grayscale: Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain Poised to Lead as US Crypto Rules Clarify first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

28 May 2026, 10:00

CFTC Says Gemini Lawsuit Should Never Have Been Filed

In a joint court filing, both parties asked a federal court to vacate the January 2025 settlement tied to Gemini’s proposed Bitcoin futures contract. The regulator said the original case relied heavily on a whistleblower whose credibility is now being questioned and argued that continuing the settlement’s remaining provisions would not serve the public interest. CFTC Moves to Undo Gemini Crypto Case The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) now wants to reverse its own enforcement action against crypto exchange Gemini after concluding that the case likely would not have been filed under the regulator’s current standards. In a joint motion that was submitted Wednesday in a Manhattan federal court, both the CFTC and Gemini requested that the court vacate the January 2025 consent order that settled allegations related to Gemini’s proposed Bitcoin futures contract. Earlier this year, Gemini agreed to pay a $5 million civil penalty to settle claims that it provided misleading information to regulators during the approval process for what was expected to become the first regulated Bitcoin futures contract in the United States. The settlement was reached without Gemini admitting or denying wrongdoing. Part of the motion that was filed in a Manhattan court In its latest filing, however, the CFTC argued that maintaining the remaining terms of the settlement would no longer serve the public interest. The regulator specifically asked the court to remove ongoing obligations tied to the agreement, including a permanent injunction that prevents Gemini from making false or misleading statements to the agency in the future. According to the filing, the original lawsuit heavily relied on testimony from a whistleblower whose credibility the agency now openly questions. The CFTC stated that the complaint was “largely based on a whistleblower’s account known to be lacking in credibility” and further admitted that the case “would not have been” pursued under the agency’s current enforcement approach. The allegations originally stemmed from events between July and December of 2017, when Gemini was seeking approval for its Bitcoin futures product. At the time, regulators accused the exchange of providing inaccurate or misleading details about auction volume and market liquidity, which were considered important factors in assessing the risks associated with the futures contract. Gemini consistently denied the allegations throughout the legal battle and held firm that there was no evidence of Bitcoin price manipulation or investor harm. The company argued that its conduct did not mislead regulators and that the enforcement action was unjustified. The CFTC’s revised position also introduced new details regarding internal concerns tied to the original whistleblower claims. According to the agency, the allegations were supported by statements from Gemini’s former chief operating officer and another subordinate who allegedly threatened Gemini founders Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss and were “known to lie about material facts.” Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss At the same time, the regulator claimed Gemini itself was actually victimized through a rebate fraud scheme that involved two customers who allegedly exploited the exchange’s fee structure. The CFTC stated that the customers admitted to defrauding Gemini of approximately $7.5 million, but prior agency leadership reportedly failed to take meaningful action despite those admissions. Although the CFTC and Gemini are now jointly requesting that the settlement be vacated, the regulator did not clarify whether Gemini would receive a refund of the $5 million penalty already paid if the court approves the request.