hodler

27 May 2026, 07:06

BlackRock sees $1.3 billion IBIT selloff as BTC drops 2.8%

🚨 A $1.3 billion dump hit BlackRock’s $IBIT, sending Bitcoin down 2.8%. Over 29 million IBIT shares were offloaded in a single trade. Continue Reading: BlackRock sees $1.3 billion IBIT selloff as BTC drops 2.8% The post BlackRock sees $1.3 billion IBIT selloff as BTC drops 2.8% appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

27 May 2026, 07:05

Staked Ethereum Hits All-Time High: 32.19% of Total Supply Now Locked

BitcoinWorld Staked Ethereum Hits All-Time High: 32.19% of Total Supply Now Locked The proportion of the total Ethereum supply that is staked has climbed to an unprecedented 32.19%, according to data from ValidatorQueue. This milestone means that roughly 39.2 million ETH are currently locked in the network’s proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, with an additional 3.3 million ETH waiting in the queue to be staked. What This Means for Ethereum’s Network Security A higher staking percentage generally strengthens the Ethereum network’s security, as it increases the economic cost of mounting an attack. With nearly a third of all ETH now committed, the network’s resistance to manipulation or malicious activity has never been higher. This is a key metric for institutional investors and developers who rely on Ethereum’s integrity for decentralized applications and financial protocols. The Growing Validator Queue The validator entry queue, which regulates how quickly new validators can join the network, currently holds demand for approximately 3.3 million ETH. This backlog indicates sustained interest from both retail and institutional participants, despite the relatively modest yield currently offered — typically in the range of 3% to 5% annually. The queue mechanism prevents the network from being overwhelmed by rapid influxes of new validators, ensuring stability during the onboarding process. Why Are More People Staking? The rise in staked ETH can be attributed to several factors. The successful transition to proof-of-stake via the Merge in 2022 eliminated the need for energy-intensive mining, making staking the only way to participate in network consensus. Additionally, the growth of liquid staking derivatives, such as Lido’s stETH and Rocket Pool’s rETH, has lowered the barrier to entry, allowing holders with less than the 32 ETH minimum to contribute to pools and still earn rewards. These tokens can also be used across decentralized finance platforms, providing liquidity while earning staking yields. Implications for ETH Supply and Price With over 32% of the total supply effectively removed from circulation, the circulating supply of ETH continues to contract. This dynamic, combined with the network’s fee-burning mechanism introduced in EIP-1559, creates a deflationary pressure that could influence the asset’s long-term value. However, it is important to note that staked ETH is not permanently locked; validators can exit and unstake, though the process involves a waiting period. The current trend suggests a strong conviction among holders to commit their assets for extended periods. Conclusion The all-time high in staked Ethereum represents a vote of confidence in the network’s proof-of-stake model and its long-term viability. As the validator queue remains full and liquid staking solutions mature, the percentage of staked ETH is likely to climb further. For the broader crypto ecosystem, this signals a maturing asset class where security and yield generation are increasingly intertwined. FAQs Q1: What is Ethereum staking? Ethereum staking involves locking up ETH to help secure the network and validate transactions. In return, validators earn rewards in the form of additional ETH. It is the core mechanism of Ethereum’s proof-of-stake consensus. Q2: Can I stake less than 32 ETH? Yes. While solo staking requires 32 ETH, you can participate through staking pools or liquid staking services like Lido, Rocket Pool, or Coinbase, which allow you to stake any amount and receive a token representing your staked position. Q3: Is staked ETH locked forever? No. Validators can voluntarily exit the network and unstake their ETH, though there is a waiting period (typically several days) before the funds become available. This process is designed to maintain network stability. This post Staked Ethereum Hits All-Time High: 32.19% of Total Supply Now Locked first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

27 May 2026, 07:03

Ethereum bull David Hoffman explains why he sold his ETH

“Ethereum got the ETH price it deserves, and I don’t see ETH being rerated as an asset, higher or lower,” says David Hoffman.

27 May 2026, 07:02

Banking Expert: When Banks Start Using XRP, the Price Will Be Calculated Based On This

Computer Engineer and Banking expert CharuSan XRP has shared a detailed explanation of how XRP could function within institutional finance, arguing that traditional market capitalization models do not accurately represent the asset’s intended role. In a recent tweet, CharuSan XRP described XRP as a “digital commodity” designed for liquidity management and cross-border settlement rather than speculative valuation alone. XRP as a Digital Commodity Market cap is a metric for stocks, Not for institutional bridge asset and a liquidity tool. When banks, FX markets, clearing institutions like the DTCC, and Nostro/Vostro accounts and the like start using XRP, the price will be calculated based… pic.twitter.com/V9sO6TRj7K — CharuSan XRP (@CharuSan83) May 25, 2026 XRP and the Institutional Liquidity Argument In the post, CharuSan XRP stated that market capitalization is primarily a metric used for stocks and should not be applied in the same way to an institutional bridge asset like XRP. According to the explanation, the value of XRP in a mature institutional environment would depend more on the availability of liquidity within payment systems than on circulating supply figures. The post specifically referenced banks, foreign exchange markets, clearing institutions such as the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), and Nostro/Vostro account systems. CharuSan XRP argued that if these entities begin using XRP at scale, the asset’s price would be influenced by what was described as “Available Effective Liquidity” within Ripple Payments and On-Demand Liquidity services. The commentary suggested that XRP’s utility would come from supporting large transaction volumes across international financial systems. Rather than focusing on supply alone, the post emphasized the importance of liquidity depth and the ability to process simultaneous global transactions without major price instability. Velocity and Liquidity Depth A central part of the discussion focused on XRP velocity. CharuSan XRP argued that transaction speed alone cannot replace liquidity depth. The post stated that even if XRP moves quickly between institutions, large-scale financial activity still requires substantial liquidity pools to prevent slippage and reduce volatility during settlement periods. The tweet included the claim that “1 XRP can circulate a maximum of 10 times a day,” which later prompted a question from another user identified as Buckle Up. The user asked where the estimate originated and whether it meant XRP could only process ten transactions daily. In response, CharuSan XRP clarified that the statement referred to the “Commodity Theory of Money” and the flow of institutional capital rather than blockchain transaction limitations. According to the reply, institutional funds and market makers cannot continuously recycle capital thousands of times per day because of operational requirements, legal obligations, and settlement procedures. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 The response further argued that, despite blockchain speed, the broader financial system still operates within regulatory and operational constraints that limit how often large pools of institutional capital can realistically turn over. Based on that reasoning, CharuSan XRP stated that the annual net velocity of capital across institutional systems stabilizes around ten. XRP’s Proposed Institutional Function The overall argument presented XRP as an asset designed to support high-value liquidity transfer rather than retail-scale transactional use alone. CharuSan XRP maintained that deep liquidity pools and higher unit values would be necessary to minimize slippage and help financial institutions manage exposure to volatility during cross-border settlement. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Banking Expert: When Banks Start Using XRP, the Price Will Be Calculated Based On This appeared first on Times Tabloid .

27 May 2026, 07:00

Arthur Hayes Sees 20x Upside For NEAR, 5x For Zcash Within One Year

Arthur Hayes said NEAR and Zcash form the core of his privacy trade, arguing that crypto markets are beginning to reprice assets tied to private value transfer, AI-era sovereignty and real protocol economics. In an interview with The Rollup, the Maelstrom CIO said NEAR could offer “20x potential,” while Zcash may have “5x potential” over the next year, framing both assets as part of a broader reaction to “big tech, big government” and AI-driven surveillance. Hayes’ thesis starts with a macro shift. Earlier this year, he said he had been cautious because Bitcoin appeared to be pricing in an “AI deflationary credit event,” with monetary authorities unlikely to print aggressively until a crisis forced their hand. That changed, he argued, after the Iran conflict crystallized a liquidity-positive setup for markets. “Governments print money to win war. AI is part of war. The AI capex will be underwritten, both in the United States and China, by the governments,” Hayes said. He added that governments in the US, China and Europe would likely fund a wartime economy and AI infrastructure through monetary expansion, with some of that liquidity leaking into Bitcoin and selected crypto assets. Why NEAR And Zcash? Hayes’ strongest comments were reserved for privacy. He once again confirmed Zcash as his “second biggest bag” and said the asset had become investable again after earlier concerns around its trusted setup, issuance profile and developer subsidy faded into the background. The old Zcash trade, in his view, was too early and too messy. The new one is cleaner, more liquid and more relevant to the current political and technological moment. Related Reading: Zcash (ZEC) Soars To Six-Month Highs After 110% Rally – Can It Break The $700 Barrier? “There’s nothing wrong with wanting to have private money over the internet,” Hayes said. “And that’s what Zcash represents, that’s what Monero represents. And as we are learning the ability for big tech, big government and AI to essentially know everything about us and to trace everything that’s going on in our lives, to have pure, just cryptographically proven privacy with money is going to be super needed.” Hayes said his renewed interest in Zcash accelerated after a conversation with Naval Ravikant during Tokyo 2049. According to Hayes, Ravikant argued that Monero’s ring signatures were weaker than commonly assumed and referenced a Japanese law-enforcement case involving deanonymization. Hayes said he bought $1 million of Zcash “right then and there,” then continued accumulating as he researched the thesis further. The price target came as Hayes connected Zcash to NEAR’s role in making private value transfer more usable across assets and chains. He argued that shielded Zcash alone is important, but the larger opportunity comes when users can move from shielded ZEC into other assets, including stablecoins, through NEAR Intents. “Within the ZODL app, I can now send any crypto asset I want to anyone across the Internet in an anonymous way. From Shielded Zcash, using Near Intents. Now I’m into, you know, USDT on Tron and I’ve sent it to whoever I’m going to send it to in an anonymous fashion. That’s huge,” Hayes said. That is where his upside estimates diverge. Hayes said Zcash remains the primary expression of the privacy trade, but NEAR may offer the more asymmetric setup because it is tied to the execution layer behind confidential transfers. “I think Near has a 20x potential where, you know, Zcash might have a 5x potential over the next year or something like that,” he said. “So you scale the capital that you allocate accordingly to the risk.” Related Reading: Why Multicoin Is Betting Big On Zcash: Tushar Jain Lays Out The Bull Case NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin reinforced the economic side of that argument, saying NEAR Intents is approaching $20 billion in lifetime volume, with $18.9 billion cited during the interview, and has generated $33 million in fees. He said NEAR takes a fee from every transaction and uses it to buy back NEAR, while the ecosystem has already halved inflation and may push for further reductions as revenue grows. Hayes also tied the trade to token structure. He said NEAR benefits from being “fully diluted,” avoiding the large overhang of venture allocations that still weighs on many L1 assets. For a token expected to move in an upmarket, he argued, that clean supply profile matters. The risk, in Hayes’ own framing, is macro. He said he intends to hold until the broader liquidity backdrop changes, but warned that reduced government support for AI capex or a worsening war scenario would alter the setup. For now, he sees privacy, AI-linked sovereignty and exchange revenue as the trades with the clearest market validation. At press time, Zcash traded at $624. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

27 May 2026, 07:00

Strategy’s latest move is more than another BTC purchase – Here’s why!

Corporate buyers are active, but retail participation's fallen lately.