hodler

17 Jan 2026, 13:28

How to Earn Interest on Crypto in 2026: Best Crypto Saving Accounts Compared

Crypto “savings accounts” can generate yield on your assets while you keep your portfolio largely intact. In 2026, most yield products fall into two buckets: Lending-style savings: platforms lend assets (or use them in structured lending) and share interest with depositors. Staking-style savings: platforms stake proof-of-stake tokens and pass through staking rewards (this does not apply to Bitcoin). The right choice depends less on headline APY and more on liquidity, transparency, payout frequency, and how the platform explains yield generation and risk controls. This guide compares four mainstream options with Clapp, Ledn, Nexo, and Revolut. 1) Clapp Flexible Savings (best for predictable yield and instant access) Clapp Flexible Savings is designed for users who want passive income without trading, staking, or complex DeFi workflows. The core product logic is simple: Daily interest crediting Instant access with no lock-ups A fixed APY shown directly in the app (no “up to” tiers) Low minimum deposit (from 10 EUR / USDC / USDT) EUR deposits via SEPA Instant Clapp states 5.2% APY on stablecoins and EUR If your goal is to “make your crypto work,” most holders do it by allocating a portion of their portfolio to stablecoins/EUR for yield, while keeping BTC exposure separate. This avoids forcing Bitcoin into products that may have lower yields or more restrictive terms. 2) Ledn Growth Accounts (best for stablecoin yield with a lending specialist) Ledn focuses heavily on a savings experience that separates interest-earning Growth accounts from non-interest Transaction accounts. Key points that matter for savers: Published, tiered stablecoin APYs shown on Ledn’s savings pages (USDC/USDT examples listed by Ledn). Ledn explains that interest for USDC/USDT Growth Accounts is generated by lending to its bitcoin-backed retail loan book, described as overcollateralized. Ledn describes interest as earned daily and paid monthly. When Ledn makes sense:You want stablecoin yield from a platform that spends most of its product effort on lending mechanics and account structure (rather than being a full exchange). 3) Nexo (best for users willing to manage tiers and lock-ups) Nexo provides two primary savings modes: Flexible Savings: earn interest with daily payouts and access funds anytime Fixed-term Savings: higher “up to” rates in exchange for locking funds for 1, 3, 6, or 12 months Nexo’s materials emphasize: Daily interest payouts (Flexible Savings) Rates depend on asset and user configuration and are often described as “up to” rates, which implies variability based on tiers/settings. When Nexo makes sense:You are comfortable optimizing settings and accepting that the best rates may require conditions (tiers, lock-ups, payout preferences). 4) Revolut (best for simple staking) Revolut’s yield feature is primarily staking, which is fundamentally different from lending-based savings: Rewards depend on the blockchain network and participation rates. Revolut states it takes a commission and that the APY shown in-app is net of Revolut’s commission. Revolut also states staking rewards are not guaranteed. Important limitation:This is not a way to earn interest on Bitcoin directly. It applies to proof-of-stake assets (e.g., ETH, SOL, DOT), not BTC. How to choose the right crypto savings option in 2026 Use these decision criteria in order: 1) Liquidity first (when do you need the money?) If you need anytime access, avoid products that require fixed terms or slow unstaking. Clapp offers a crypto savings account with instant access ; Nexo has flexible but also fixed-term products; Revolut access depends on unstaking rules. 2) Rate transparency (can you predict your return?) Prefer clearly displayed rates without tiers if you want predictable planning. If you accept complexity, tiered “up to” structures can be competitive but require active management. 3) Yield source (lending vs staking) BTC: typically earns via lending-style products (when offered). Stablecoins: often earn higher yields than BTC across most platforms. Revolut: staking only—use it when you specifically want PoS staking exposure. 4) Operational and platform risk No yield is risk-free. Prioritize platforms that explain: how yield is generated, what happens in stress scenarios, and how custody and counterparties are handled. Ledn is unusually explicit about how USDC/USDT Growth interest is generated. Nexo and Revolut also provide clear product help-center explanations for payout mechanics and staking commission. How to start earning interest on crypto Decide the asset: BTC vs stablecoins vs EUR (your “savings” asset should match your risk tolerance). Choose the product type: flexible savings (liquidity) vs fixed-term (higher yield) vs staking (PoS only). Start small: deposit a test amount and verify payout timing and withdrawal speed. Track net return: focus on net APY after commissions, tiers, and lock-up effects. Diversify platform exposure: avoid concentrating all savings in a single provider. FAQ Can you earn interest on Bitcoin in 2026? Yes, on some lending-style platforms that support BTC yield. Returns are often lower than stablecoin yields, and terms vary by platform and jurisdiction. Are crypto savings accounts the same as bank savings accounts? No. They do not have the same protections and can involve platform, custody, counterparty, and market risks. Treat them as investment products. Why are stablecoin yields usually higher than BTC yields? Demand for borrowing stablecoins (trading, settlements, credit products) often supports higher rates than BTC lending markets. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

17 Jan 2026, 12:48

California fines Nexo $500K as crypto lenders face scrutiny

Crypto lending platform Nexo faces a half-million-dollar penalty from California regulators for making thousands of loans without proper licensing, throwing cold water on the company’s plans to restart operations in the United States. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation slapped Nexo with a $500,000 fine after discovering the firm gave out crypto-backed loans to more than 5,456 people in the state without getting the necessary approvals first. Regulators say the company also skipped basic steps like checking if borrowers could actually pay back the money. What regulators found The enforcement action targets a Cayman Islands-based part of Nexo called Nexo Capital Inc. Officials found the company handed out both personal and business loans backed by cryptocurrency between July 26, 2018, and November 22, 2022, all while operating without a valid California license. “Lenders must follow the law and avoid making risky loans that endanger consumers—and crypto-backed loans are no exception,” said KC Mohseni, who runs the state financial department. Regulators discovered Nexo didn’t bother looking into whether borrowers had the money to repay loans, what other debts they already owed, or what their credit looked like. These are standard checks that traditional lenders must perform before handing out money. Beyond paying the fine, Nexo must move all California customer money to a properly licensed U.S. partner company within the next 150 days. The punishment comes at a bad time for Nexo. The corporation has been indicating that it wants to return to the American market, but this action raises concerns about whether existing problems will continue to hinder that effort. Although the punishment is for previous actions, it comes at a time when digital currency startups are questioning whether regulators are softening their stance. California carries significant weight in these areas. It is the country’s largest state in terms of population and economic activity, making it an important market for any company that provides consumer financial services. What happens in California often foreshadows how things will unfold nationally. During the time period regulators examined, Nexo grew its crypto-backed lending business substantially before eventually pulling out of the U.S. market altogether. The company left as state and federal officials increased their scrutiny of how it operated. Questions about Nexo’s future These days, Nexo no longer offers its traditional crypto lending products to American customers. It only provides crypto-backed borrowing services to people outside the United States, a change that came after multiple run-ins with regulators. Kadan Stadelmann, who works as Chief Technology Officer at Komodo Platform, said the findings should worry people. “The fact that Nexo failed basic ability-to-repay checks for thousands undoubtedly raises red flags about systemic compliance shortfalls, and consumers should heed these warnings,” he noted. Stadelmann pointed out that California’s rules focus heavily on making sure loans are backed by enough collateral to protect people from defaults. The state also has strong borrower protections designed to prevent a repeat of the 2008 financial meltdown, but in the crypto world . He also mentioned that Nexo’s settlement approach, where companies do not admit or deny wrongdoing, helps firms avoid problems like shareholder lawsuits or getting blocked from obtaining future licenses. However, he warned the company “could face further admissions, increasing fines, or regulatory monitors” as officials continue examining its track record. “Other crypto companies have faced similar regulatory penalties, including the likes of FTX and Binance, and remain in business. Why not Nexo?” Stadelmann asked. The California action adds to Nexo’s growing list of regulatory headaches in America and raises fresh questions about whether firms with checkered compliance histories can make a comeback, even if the political winds seem to be shifting in crypto’s favor. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

17 Jan 2026, 11:55

Crypto Whale’s Shocking $40M Windfall from Leveraged Positions Amid Insider Trading Allegations

BitcoinWorld Crypto Whale’s Shocking $40M Windfall from Leveraged Positions Amid Insider Trading Allegations In a stunning development that has captured the attention of the global cryptocurrency community, a single digital wallet address on the Hyperliquid perpetual futures exchange now holds approximately $40 million in unrealized profits from highly leveraged positions. This crypto whale, identified by the address beginning with 0xb317, previously faced serious insider trading allegations connected to a historic market event. The situation presents a complex case study of market dynamics, risk, and the ongoing challenges of regulation in decentralized finance. Crypto Whale’s Massive Leveraged Positions Detailed The whale’s current portfolio reveals an aggressive trading strategy with substantial exposure to three major cryptocurrencies. According to on-chain data analysis, the positions include a 5x leveraged long position on 1,000 Bitcoin (BTC) showing a profit of $3.78 million, entered at an average price of $91,506. Furthermore, the address holds a 5x leveraged long on 223,340 Ethereum (ETH) with an impressive $30.96 million profit, established at an average entry of $3,161. Additionally, the trader maintains a 10x leveraged long position in Solana (SOL) showing a $7.09 million gain from an average entry price of $130. These positions collectively represent one of the most significant concentrated bets currently visible on public blockchain ledgers. Market analysts note that such substantial leveraged positions create both opportunity and systemic risk. Consequently, the whale’s trading activity can influence market sentiment and liquidity conditions. The use of 5x and 10x leverage amplifies both potential gains and losses dramatically, representing a high-risk approach that few institutional investors would typically undertake. Technical Analysis of Position Management Professional traders examining the whale’s entry points note strategic timing across different assets. The Bitcoin position entered near what technical analysts identify as a key support level in late 2024. Meanwhile, the Ethereum accumulation began during a period of network upgrade optimism. The Solana position coincides with renewed developer activity on the network. Each entry demonstrates possible fundamental analysis rather than purely speculative momentum trading. Historical Context: The October Forced Liquidation Event The address first attracted significant attention in October 2024 during what market participants describe as the largest forced liquidation event in cryptocurrency derivatives history. During that volatile period, approximately $2.1 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated across major exchanges within 24 hours. The cascade began with unexpected volatility in Bitcoin markets that triggered margin calls across connected positions in Ethereum, Solana, and other major altcoins. Blockchain forensic firms subsequently identified several addresses, including 0xb317, that established substantial short positions immediately before the liquidation cascade. These positions reportedly generated profits exceeding $15 million during the market downturn. Trading patterns showed these addresses increasing their short exposure during the 72 hours preceding the volatility spike, timing that market surveillance experts described as statistically anomalous. The event prompted investigations from multiple regulatory bodies and intensified debates about market manipulation in cryptocurrency markets. Exchange operators implemented additional safeguards, including increased margin requirements for large positions and enhanced monitoring of coordinated trading activity. Despite these measures, the recent profitable long positions by the same address have reignited concerns about sophisticated actors potentially exploiting market mechanisms. Identity Speculation and the BitForex Connection Several cryptocurrency investigators and community members have publicly speculated that the address may belong to Garrett Jin, former CEO of the now-defunct BitForex exchange. Jin led the Singapore-based exchange from 2018 until its sudden collapse in early 2024, when users reported inability to withdraw funds totaling approximately $500 million. The exchange officially ceased operations amid regulatory pressure and liquidity issues. Blockchain analysis shows that several addresses associated with BitForex’s operational wallets interacted with the 0xb317 address between 2022 and 2023. These transactions involved moderate transfers of Ethereum and various ERC-20 tokens. However, no definitive on-chain evidence conclusively proves identity ownership, as cryptocurrency addresses are pseudonymous by design. Jin has not publicly commented on these allegations, and his current whereabouts and activities remain unconfirmed by independent sources. The speculation highlights broader concerns about former exchange operators potentially leveraging insider knowledge of market mechanics. Former executives possess detailed understanding of liquidation engines, liquidity distribution, and trader behavior patterns that could theoretically inform sophisticated trading strategies. Regulatory frameworks in traditional finance typically impose strict trading restrictions on exchange insiders, but such rules remain inconsistently applied across global cryptocurrency jurisdictions. Market Impact of Large Whale Positions The whale’s current $40 million paper profit represents more than just personal gain. Such substantial positions affect overall market dynamics in measurable ways. First, the positions consume significant available liquidity on Hyperliquid’s order books, potentially increasing slippage for other traders. Second, the knowledge of such large leveraged positions can influence market sentiment, with some traders potentially following the whale’s direction while others prepare for possible liquidation cascades if markets move against the positions. Exchange risk managers monitor large concentrated positions closely because their liquidation could trigger secondary effects. A forced closure of 1,000 Bitcoin at 5x leverage would require the exchange to sell approximately $90 million worth of Bitcoin into the market, potentially creating temporary price dislocations. Similarly, the Ethereum and Solana positions represent substantial market exposure that requires careful risk management by both the trader and the exchange. Regulatory Implications and Compliance Challenges The situation presents multiple regulatory considerations for authorities worldwide. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has increasingly focused on cryptocurrency market manipulation cases, with several high-profile settlements announced in 2024. European regulators under MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) framework are developing specific provisions for market abuse monitoring in digital asset markets. Asian financial authorities, particularly in Singapore and Japan, have strengthened exchange oversight following several collapses. Key regulatory challenges include: Jurisdictional complexity : The pseudonymous nature of blockchain addresses complicates identity verification across borders Definitional issues : Legal frameworks differ on whether certain cryptocurrency trading activities constitute traditional insider trading Evidence standards : Blockchain analysis provides circumstantial evidence but rarely meets traditional financial investigation standards Enforcement mechanisms : Regulatory bodies struggle to apply sanctions to pseudonymous entities operating across decentralized platforms Despite these challenges, regulatory momentum is building toward greater oversight. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has pushed for stricter implementation of travel rule requirements for virtual asset service providers. Major jurisdictions are increasingly requiring exchanges to implement sophisticated market surveillance tools similar to those used in traditional equity markets. These developments suggest that the regulatory environment for large cryptocurrency traders will likely become more constrained in coming years. Technical Analysis of Hyperliquid’s Risk Management Hyperliquid, as the hosting exchange for these positions, employs specific risk management protocols for large leveraged positions. The platform uses a mark price mechanism derived from multiple external price feeds to prevent manipulation. Additionally, the exchange implements incremental liquidation processes that gradually reduce positions as maintenance margin requirements approach, rather than executing full liquidations at once. The exchange’s insurance fund, currently valued at approximately $45 million, provides protection against undercollateralized liquidations. This fund would cover losses if a large position’s liquidation cannot be executed at or above the bankruptcy price. The whale’s positions represent a significant but manageable portion of this fund, according to risk metrics published by the exchange. Hyperliquid’s transparent approach to publishing these metrics represents an industry advancement toward greater risk disclosure. Other exchanges have adopted similar transparency initiatives following the 2024 liquidation events. By publicly displaying large position concentrations and insurance fund status, platforms aim to reduce uncertainty during volatile periods. This transparency theoretically allows traders to make more informed decisions about their exposure to platform risk and potential liquidation cascades. Broader Market Implications and Trader Sentiment The whale’s substantial long positions coincide with generally bullish sentiment across cryptocurrency markets in early 2025. Several fundamental factors support this optimism, including increased institutional adoption through spot Bitcoin ETFs, ongoing development of Ethereum’s scalability solutions, and growing real-world asset tokenization projects. However, the presence of such large leveraged positions introduces additional volatility risk to the current market structure. Professional trading desks typically monitor whale activity as one of multiple indicators. While some view large leveraged positions as confidence signals, others interpret them as potential volatility triggers. The current situation presents a paradox: the whale’s successful navigation of previous volatility suggests sophisticated market understanding, but the scale of leverage creates vulnerability to unexpected market movements. Market participants should consider several key factors: Liquidity conditions : Current market depth supports orderly liquidation if needed Correlation risks : The positions span multiple correlated assets Regulatory developments : Ongoing investigations could affect market psychology Technical indicators : Market structure shows both strength and overextension signals Conclusion The crypto whale holding $40 million in unrealized profits from leveraged positions on Hyperliquid represents a multifaceted story of opportunity, risk, and regulatory evolution. While the substantial gains demonstrate potential rewards from sophisticated cryptocurrency trading, the lingering insider trading allegations highlight ongoing market integrity challenges. As regulatory frameworks develop and exchange surveillance improves, market participants can expect increased scrutiny of large position accumulation and timing. The situation ultimately underscores cryptocurrency markets’ continued maturation, where substantial profits attract both admiration and investigation in equal measure. The crypto whale’s journey will likely influence both trading strategies and regulatory approaches throughout 2025 and beyond. FAQs Q1: What is a crypto whale in cryptocurrency markets? A crypto whale refers to an individual or entity that holds large enough amounts of a cryptocurrency to potentially influence market prices through their trading activities. These entities typically control addresses containing millions or tens of millions of dollars worth of digital assets. Q2: How does leverage work in cryptocurrency trading? Leverage allows traders to control positions larger than their initial capital by borrowing funds from the exchange. For example, 5x leverage means controlling $5 worth of assets for every $1 of collateral. While this amplifies potential profits, it also magnifies losses and increases liquidation risk if prices move against the position. Q3: What was the October 2024 forced liquidation event? In October 2024, cryptocurrency markets experienced extreme volatility that triggered approximately $2.1 billion in liquidated leveraged positions across major exchanges within 24 hours. The cascade began with unexpected Bitcoin price movements that created margin calls across connected positions in Ethereum, Solana, and other major cryptocurrencies. Q4: What are insider trading allegations in cryptocurrency markets? Insider trading allegations suggest that traders may have used non-public information to execute profitable trades. In cryptocurrency contexts, this could include knowledge of upcoming exchange listings, protocol changes, or large impending transactions that could affect market prices before such information becomes publicly available. Q5: How do exchanges manage risk from large leveraged positions? Exchanges employ multiple risk management strategies including maintenance margin requirements, incremental liquidation processes, insurance funds, and position size limits. Many platforms also use mark prices derived from multiple external sources to prevent price manipulation and ensure fair liquidations during volatile periods. This post Crypto Whale’s Shocking $40M Windfall from Leveraged Positions Amid Insider Trading Allegations first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

17 Jan 2026, 11:34

Why Is Pi Network’s Price Stuck? AI Reveals the 3 Things PI Needs for a Rally

The cryptocurrency markets experienced a wild start to the new year, with BTC surging by almost ten grand to a two-month peak of $98,000 before it was stopped. Many altcoins posted even more impressive gains mid-week but have failed to double down. Pi Network’s native token, though, cannot say the same. It has been stuck in consolidation for several weeks, without any clear indication whether it will be able to break out of the $0.20 and $0.22 range. As such, we decided to ask ChatGPT what is needed for PI to finally move out of this rather dull trading zone. What’s Holding You Down, PI? The Core Team behind the controversial project already released its first major update for the year, which promises to slash the needed time for PI payment integrations under ten minutes. However, it failed to impact the underlying asset. ChatGPT believes there’s reason to this (lack of) madness. First, it said supply overhang is crushing the momentum. Unlike most other liquid altcoins, PI is dealing with heavy unlock pressure. As more tokens become transferable, any upside attempt quickly runs into selling from early participants who had waited a long time for their assets. Data from PiScanUnlock shows that over 4.5 million tokens on average will be freed in the next 30 days, which is expected to intensify the immediate selling pressure. ChatGPT also said there are no external capital inflows. Most altcoin rallies have been fueled by new capital rotating out of BTC, but PI remains largely isolated. Lastly, the AI noted that the ecosystem growth hasn’t translated to price gains. So, What Do You Need, PI? The AI solution believes PI will “require one or more major catalysts, not just routine updates” to break out of the $0.20-$0.22 range. It listed a clear, unavoidable use case that creates real demand, such as at least one of the following: Large-scale merchant adoption using PI as payment A widely used PI-native application that requires the token to function Network mechanics that reduce circulating supply (burns, locks, staking) Second, ChatGPT outlined liquidity expansion beyond the Core Community. This doesn’t necessarily mean a listing from a big exchange, such as Binance or Coinbase, but it requires capital from outside the PI ecosystem. Lastly, the AI solution said PI needs a supply narrative shift as markets respond to strong changes in such dynamics. If the Core Team introduces slower unlock schedules, long-term lock incentives, or deflationary mechanics, then even modest demand can suddenly have a much larger price impact. The post Why Is Pi Network’s Price Stuck? AI Reveals the 3 Things PI Needs for a Rally appeared first on CryptoPotato .

17 Jan 2026, 11:30

Ripple Labs execs, escrow among top 50 addresses holding about 45% of XRP supply

Market data shows that the top 10 addresses control about 18.56% of the total XRP supply. Addresses numbered 10 to 50 control 24.85% more, and the rest, 56.59%, is spread out among millions of smaller wallets. Ripple Labs remains the single largest owner of XRP when all company-linked wallets are added together. When escrow wallets count toward rankings, seven of the top ten XRP wallets belong to Ripple. Ripple Labs Escrow is at the top of the list with 45% of the total supply, which manages predictable releases. The second-largest holder of XRP is Ripple Labs (operational), which holds nearly 1% of the total XRP supply. Max XRP ownership goes to Ripple, institutions, and crypto exchanges Since the launch, XRP supply stands at 100 billion tokens. There is no mining or staking process for the token. Instead, it is distributed through methods including escrow, allocation, and market transactions. Each month, up to 1 billion XRP is unlocked, with unused amounts returned to escrow. Data from on-chain analytics shows that the maximum XRP ownership is held by whales, including institutional buyers, Ripple founders, and others. Japan’s SBI Holdings owns about $10.4 billion in XRP. Just after Ripple Labs, large XRP wallets belong to centralized exchanges that hold XRP on behalf of users instead of as proprietary assets. Binance is the biggest holder with approximately 1.8 billion XRP. South Korea’s Bithumb ties closely with approximately 1.8 billion XRP after increasing its balance by roughly 30% in 2025. Uphold and Upbit also rank among the top custodians. As reported by Cryptopolitan, these numbers reflected that XRP’s trading volumes on Binance, Upbit, and Uphold did well in 2025. XRP did better than Bitcoin and Ethereum on Upbit, making up 28% of the exchange’s 24-hour trading volume rise, which hit $13.39 billion. Uphold’s data also revealed XRP as the most traded asset in 2025, bolstered by yield products tied to the Flare Network. Meanwhile, the Binance XRP/USDT pair, by trade volume, saw a 69% increase as the year began. Meanwhile, the coin is steady with a minor decline of 0.17% now trading at $2.06. In comparison to the other assets, XRP has also seen a decline in the last week as its peers see small gains, which has caused it to be overtaken by Binance after slipping to a market cap of approximately $125 billion Ripple execs take over 4% of the XRP supply Ripple execs are the biggest holders of the individual wallets. Ripple co-founder and executive chairman Chris Larsen publicly linked wallets have an estimated 2.5 to 2.7 billion XRP, which translates to approximately 4-5% of the total supply. Although exact figures fluctuate with market prices, reports suggest that the co-founder has realized over $760 million in profits since 2018. Brad Garlinghouse is also suspected of having one of the largest personal XRP holdings. However, these are not publicly disclosed. Jed McCaleb, another Ripple co-founder, was given 9 billion XRP in 2012. However, he completed the sale of his XRP holdings after leaving the company in 2014 for approximately $3.2 billion. Other large wallets are associated with anonymous addresses. One of them holds approximately 1.2 billion XRP , while another controls more than 700 million XRP. In total, the top 50 XRP addresses control approximately 43% to 50% of the circulating supply. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

17 Jan 2026, 10:29

BitMine pulls $65M in ETH from Kraken in latest accumulation move

Lookonchain data revealed hours ago that a Bitmine wallet has accumulated approximately $65.4 million in ETH. The transaction involved a withdrawal from the Kraken exchange, showing 20,000 ETH moved to the firm’s wallet. Based on on-chain data, withdrawals made by whales from exchanges have historically suggested accumulation rather than liquidation. The withdrawal reflects the intent to move funds to a cold storage for long-term holding rather than immediate sale. Bitmine ETH accumulation hits 4.07M ETH Bitmine recently accumulated another 24,068 ETH on Wednesday, valued at approximately $80.57 million. The firm now holds 4.07 million ETH worth approximately $13.37 billion and represents 3.36% of ETH’s total supply. Tom Lee’s firm now ranks as the second-largest crypto treasury, behind Strategy, which holds 687,410 BTC, worth approximately $65.4 billion. It seems that Tom Lee( @fundstrat )'s #Bitmine bought another 20,000 $ETH ($65.4M) from #Kraken 3 hours ago. https://t.co/TQmP08vgjv https://t.co/DPN3ZPwXAk pic.twitter.com/ovs3VUqJu6 — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) January 16, 2026 The Ethereum token has jumped over 6% over the past week following a series of accumulations recorded by the treasury firm. At the time of publication, ETH was down 0.64% to $3,293. The recent moves follow Bitmines’ plans to launch its MAVAN (Made in America Validator Network) staking solution this year, in order to maintain its lead as a global crypto treasury firm. Tom Lee, chairman of Bitmine , pitched the MAVAN solution as a design strategy that moves the treasury firm from accumulation to monetization through validator operations. “We continue to make progress on our staking solution known as The Made in America Validator Network (MAVAN). This will be the ‘best-in-class’ solution offering secure staking infrastructure and will be deployed in early calendar 2026.” – Tom Lee , Chairman of Bitmine The launch of the MAVAN solution will help move his firm to become the largest staking provider across the crypto landscape, according to the Chairman. During the recent annual meeting on 15th January, Tom Lee urged Bitmine’s shareholders to vote to increase the authorized shares. He explained that Bitmine’s charter has an unusual feature requiring 50% of all outstanding shares to support a share increase. According to him, the clause limits the authorized share increase; therefore, there is a need to pursue the increment immediately to avoid slowing accumulation. Bitmine’s stock jumps over 4% this week Bitmine’s current total staked ETH stands at 2,155,656, valued at $7 billion, according to Arkham Intelligence data . This represents an increase of more than half a million since last week. So far, the CESR (Composite Ethereum staking rate) is 2.81% according to Quatrefoil data . Tom Lee outlined that if ETH is fully staked by MAVAN and its staking partners, the firm could realize an annual staking fee of $374 million at a 2.81% CESR. Bitmine’s stock has jumped 0.94% today following the news of accumulation trading at $31.16. The stock has recorded an over 4% increase, with an average volume of $45.39 million over the past five days following a series of accumulations. Meanwhile, Ethereum-focused treasuries hold approximately 13.1 million ETH , including those focused on staking and ETF strategies. Sharplink is the largest competitor to Bitmine, with current accumulation standing at 863.02 K ETH valued at $2.84 billion, followed by The Ether Machine treasury firm. The Ether Machine now holds 496.1K ETH, valued at $1.64 billion. U.S. Ethereum ETFs now hold approximately 6.31 million ETH valued at approximately $20.67 billion. That is roughly 5.2% of the total ETH supply. Based on data delivered by SoSoValue, BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has attracted $12.94 billion since its launch, representing more than 50% of the market share across ETH ETFs. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .