Invest ideasNews
8 Mar 2026, 05:14
Top crypto to watch: Pi Network, Polkadot, Sei, Pump, Starknet
The crypto market was highly volatile last week as the war in Iran continued and the US published weak jobs numbers. Bitcoin price soared to $74,000 and then pulled back to $66,000 as inflation concerns remained. This article explores some of the top crypto to watch this week, including Polkadot (DOT), Pi Network (PI), and Sei (SEI). PI Network in focus ahead of Pi Day Pi Network has been one of the best-performing coins in the crypto industry this month as it surged to its highest level since December. It has jumped by over 80% from its lowest level this year, outperforming Bitcoin and most altcoins. Pi Network will be in the spotlight this week because March 14th is Pi Day, a global day that commemorates the mathematical constant pi. It is marked that day because it coincides with the dates (3.14). In most cases, this day is celebrated by mathematicians and often includes things like buying and eating pies. Pi Network has historically used this day to make some major announcements, which often impact the price. For example, the team released the outcome of a test involving OpenMind, a company it invested in last year. The test involved using its validators to provide computing power to the company. https://twitter.com/PiCoreTeam/status/2029981480852853209 In the future, more validators will be enrolled to the program and earn returns. The Pi Day also comes during the ongoing protocol upgrade to v23. A major upgrade is currently underway and will be completed on March 12. Also, there are rumors that the DEX and AMM feature will be launched later this week. Polkadot tokenomics overhaul Polkadot, a top layer-1 network created by Gavin Wood, an Ethereum creator, will be one of the top cryptocurrencies to watch this week. One reason it will be in the spotlight is that 21Shares launched TDOT on Friday. TDOT is the first Polkadot ETF in the United States and has over $11 million in assets. Therefore, traders will pay attention to the coin for any signs of demand from American investors. The other key reason is that the developers will make a major tokenomics overhaul this week. This overhaul will introduce some major changes, including, reducing the maximum number of tokens in circulation to 2.1 billion. https://twitter.com/Polkadot/status/2028482336463945765 The network will also reduce emissions by 53.6% and reduce the number of unbonding days from 28 to between 24 and 48 hours. In a statement last week, the team said that the changes will introduce lower emissions, improve validator accountability, and have a governance-directed allocation. Sei, Pump, Starknet, and Zebec Some of the other top coins to watch are those with token unlocks this week. A token unlock is a situation where new tokens are introduced to the market, a move that increases the number of tokens in circulation. In theory, token unlocks are usually bearish for cryptocurrencies. Pump, which has a market capitalization of $664 million, will unlock 10 billion tokens worth over $18 million. Sei, a top layer-1 network, will unlock 121 million tokens worth $7.73 million, while Starknet will unlock 163 million coins worth $6.14 million. Zebec Network will unlock 1.04 billion tokens. On top of all this, the crypto market will react to the ongoing war in Iran that has pushed energy prices higher globally. Hyperliquid data shows that crude oil prices have soared to $110 after some key countries like Kuwait announced production cuts. The crypto market will also react to the upcoming US consumer inflation report on Wednesday this week. The post Top crypto to watch: Pi Network, Polkadot, Sei, Pump, Starknet appeared first on Invezz
8 Mar 2026, 05:14
Top crypto to watch this week: Pi Network, Polkadot, Sei, Pump, and Starknet
The crypto market was highly volatile last week as the war in Iran continued and the US published weak jobs numbers. Bitcoin price soared to $74,000 and then pulled back to $66,000 as inflation concerns remained. This article explores some of the top crypto to watch this week, including Polkadot (DOT), Pi Network (PI), and Sei (SEI). PI Network in focus ahead of Pi Day Pi Network has been one of the best-performing coins in the crypto industry this month as it surged to its highest level since December. It has jumped by over 80% from its lowest level this year, outperforming Bitcoin and most altcoins. Pi Network will be in the spotlight this week because March 14th is Pi Day, a global day that commemorates the mathematical constant pi. It is marked that day because it coincides with the dates (3.14). In most cases, this day is celebrated by mathematicians and often includes things like buying and eating pies. Pi Network has historically used this day to make some major announcements, which often impact the price. For example, the team released the outcome of a test involving OpenMind, a company it invested in last year. The test involved using its validators to provide computing power to the company. https://twitter.com/PiCoreTeam/status/2029981480852853209 In the future, more validators will be enrolled to the program and earn returns. The Pi Day also comes during the ongoing protocol upgrade to v23. A major upgrade is currently underway and will be completed on March 12. Also, there are rumors that the DEX and AMM feature will be launched later this week. Polkadot tokenomics overhaul Polkadot, a top layer-1 network created by Gavin Wood, an Ethereum creator, will be one of the top cryptocurrencies to watch this week. One reason it will be in the spotlight is that 21Shares launched TDOT on Friday. TDOT is the first Polkadot ETF in the United States and has over $11 million in assets. Therefore, traders will pay attention to the coin for any signs of demand from American investors. The other key reason is that the developers will make a major tokenomics overhaul this week. This overhaul will introduce some major changes, including, reducing the maximum number of tokens in circulation to 2.1 billion. https://twitter.com/Polkadot/status/2028482336463945765 The network will also reduce emissions by 53.6% and reduce the number of unbonding days from 28 to between 24 and 48 hours. In a statement last week, the team said that the changes will introduce lower emissions, improve validator accountability, and have a governance-directed allocation. Sei, Pump, Starknet, and Zebec Some of the other top coins to watch are those with token unlocks this week. A token unlock is a situation where new tokens are introduced to the market, a move that increases the number of tokens in circulation. In theory, token unlocks are usually bearish for cryptocurrencies. Pump, which has a market capitalization of $664 million, will unlock 10 billion tokens worth over $18 million. Sei, a top layer-1 network, will unlock 121 million tokens worth $7.73 million, while Starknet will unlock 163 million coins worth $6.14 million. Zebec Network will unlock 1.04 billion tokens. On top of all this, the crypto market will react to the ongoing war in Iran that has pushed energy prices higher globally. Hyperliquid data shows that crude oil prices have soared to $110 after some key countries like Kuwait announced production cuts. The crypto market will also react to the upcoming US consumer inflation report on Wednesday this week. The post Top crypto to watch this week: Pi Network, Polkadot, Sei, Pump, and Starknet appeared first on Invezz
7 Mar 2026, 08:00
Bitcoin Faces A New Quantum Era As Giant Computing Facility Breaks Ground
Just over 10,000 Bitcoin — out of nearly 20 million in circulation — sits in wallets actually exposed to a quantum attack. That number comes from CoinShares, a crypto asset management firm, which found in February that only 10,230 coins are both vulnerable to quantum computing and tied to wallet addresses with publicly visible cryptographic keys. At current prices, that amounts to close to $730 million — a sum the firm described as resembling a routine trade, not a market crisis. A Steel Frame Takes Shape In Chicago The finding lands at an awkward moment. This week, PsiQuantum co-founder Peter Shadbolt posted a photo to X showing the Chicago construction site where his company is building what it calls the world’s first commercially useful quantum computer. In six days, workers had erected 500 tons of steel. The structure will house a machine capable of running 1 million qubits — a unit of quantum computing power. Scientists say that capacity is, in theory, sufficient to crack the type of encryption protecting Bitcoin wallets. Time to build really big quantum computers. Five hundred tons of steel up in six days. Cryoplant delivery date breathing down our neck. Grateful to the many hundreds of people locked in to this mission pic.twitter.com/eqSwsESusK — Pete Shadbolt (@PeteShadbolt) March 5, 2026 The company raised $1 billion for the project, announced in September, with chipmaker Nvidia as a key partner. PsiQuantum says the facility is designed to support fault-tolerant quantum computing and serve as infrastructure for next-generation AI systems. For context, the largest quantum computer currently operating at the California Institute of Technology runs on 6,100 qubits. A jump to 1 million represents a scale that has no precedent in the field. What Would Actually Be At Risk Bitcoin’s encryption relies on 256-bit cryptographic keys. A preprint paper published last month put the number of qubits needed to break 2048-bit keys at around 100,000 — suggesting that a 1 million-qubit machine could, mathematically, do the job. But experts have long noted that raw qubit count is only part of the equation. Error rates and system stability matter just as much. Not all Bitcoin wallets face equal exposure. Coins held in addresses that have never made a transaction — known as unspent transaction outputs, or UTXOs — are considered most at risk, particularly those whose public keys have been exposed on the blockchain. Many of those wallets date back to Bitcoin’s earliest days. Developers Are Already Working On A Fix Bitcoin developers have been debating how to respond. One option on the table is a hard fork — a fundamental change to the network’s code — to introduce post-quantum cryptography. A co-author of BIP-360, a proposal aimed at making Bitcoin quantum-resistant, said that the upgrade could take as long as seven years to fully implement. PsiQuantum , for its part, has said it has no intention of using its technology to attack Bitcoin. Co-founder Terry Rudolph made that point publicly at a Bitcoin quantum summit last July. Experts in the field say a genuine quantum threat to Bitcoin is still at least a decade away. For now, construction continues in Chicago — 500 tons of steel and counting. Featured image from Unsplash+/Alex Shuper, chart from TradingView
6 Mar 2026, 07:40
Quantum Computing Bitcoin Threat: PsiQuantum Facility Groundbreaking Ignites Critical Security Debate
BitcoinWorld Quantum Computing Bitcoin Threat: PsiQuantum Facility Groundbreaking Ignites Critical Security Debate The groundbreaking ceremony for PsiQuantum’s pioneering quantum computing facility in the United States has reignited a critical debate about Bitcoin’s long-term security, according to industry reports from BeInCrypto in early 2025. This development marks the first practical-scale quantum computer project in the nation, scheduled for completion by 2028. Consequently, cryptocurrency experts and blockchain developers now face renewed questions about encryption vulnerabilities. The facility’s construction represents a significant milestone in quantum advancement. Therefore, the cryptocurrency community must carefully assess potential implications. Quantum Computing Bitcoin Threat: Understanding the Core Concern Quantum computers utilize quantum bits or qubits. These qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously. This capability enables quantum machines to solve certain mathematical problems exponentially faster than classical computers. Specifically, quantum algorithms like Shor’s algorithm could theoretically break the cryptographic schemes securing Bitcoin wallets. Bitcoin relies on Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for key generation. Additionally, it uses the SHA-256 hashing function for transaction verification. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could reverse-engineer private keys from public addresses. However, experts debate the timeline for this capability. The PsiQuantum facility aims to build a fault-tolerant quantum computer. This machine would represent a major technological leap. Currently, Bitcoin’s encryption remains secure against classical computing attacks. Nevertheless, the theoretical threat from quantum computing persists. Researchers have identified several potential attack vectors: Private Key Extraction: Quantum computers could derive private keys from public keys Transaction Interception: Quantum algorithms might forge digital signatures during transmission Mining Advantage: Quantum systems could potentially solve proof-of-work puzzles faster The cryptocurrency industry monitors quantum computing progress closely. Many blockchain projects already explore quantum-resistant solutions. Meanwhile, PsiQuantum continues development of its photonic quantum computing approach. PsiQuantum Facility Groundbreaking and Technical Specifications PsiQuantum’s new facility represents a $1 billion investment in quantum infrastructure. The company specializes in photonic quantum computing technology. This approach uses particles of light (photons) as qubits. Photonic systems potentially offer advantages in stability and scalability. The facility will house the world’s first utility-scale quantum computer. Construction began in early 2025 with a target operational date of 2028. The project has attracted significant government and private investment. PsiQuantum co-founder Terry Rudolph addressed security concerns directly. In July 2024, he stated the company would not design its quantum computer for cryptocurrency attacks. However, the technology’s capabilities remain theoretically applicable to breaking encryption. The facility’s development follows years of research and smaller-scale prototypes. Industry observers note the project’s ambitious timeline. Many experts question whether practical quantum advantage will arrive by 2028. Expert Perspectives on the Quantum Threat Timeline Cryptocurrency leaders express divergent views about quantum computing risks. Michael Saylor, MicroStrategy founder, considers the threat exaggerated. He emphasizes Bitcoin’s adaptability and community response capabilities. Similarly, Charles Hoskinson, Cardano founder, believes quantum resistance solutions will emerge before threats materialize. Cory Klippsten, Swan Bitcoin CEO, shares this optimistic perspective. He points to ongoing cryptographic research within the Bitcoin community. Conversely, David Carvalho, Naoris Protocol CEO, presents a more urgent timeline. He predicts blockchain encryption algorithms could become vulnerable within two to three years. This assessment considers accelerating quantum hardware development. Carvalho advocates for immediate adoption of quantum-resistant protocols. The disagreement highlights uncertainty in quantum advancement predictions. Quantum Computing Threat Assessment Timeline Expert/Organization Threat Timeline Estimate Recommended Action David Carvalho (Naoris Protocol) 2-3 years Immediate protocol upgrades National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 10-15 years Gradual migration to post-quantum cryptography Bitcoin Core Developers Undetermined Ongoing research and monitoring Academic Consensus 5-20 years Preparation without panic Blockchain Encryption Security and Quantum Resistance Solutions Blockchain networks employ multiple cryptographic techniques for security. Bitcoin specifically uses: ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm): Creates digital signatures for transactions SHA-256 (Secure Hash Algorithm 256-bit): Generates transaction hashes and powers mining RIPEMD-160: Creates Bitcoin addresses from public keys Researchers have identified several quantum-resistant cryptographic approaches. Lattice-based cryptography shows particular promise for blockchain applications. Hash-based signatures also offer quantum resistance through one-time use schemes. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has standardized several post-quantum algorithms. However, implementing these in existing blockchains presents challenges. Bitcoin would require a hard fork for fundamental cryptographic changes. The community must reach consensus on such significant modifications. Several blockchain projects already incorporate quantum-resistant features. QANplatform implements lattice-based cryptography natively. Similarly, the Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL) uses hash-based signatures. These projects demonstrate technical feasibility but lack Bitcoin’s network effects. The Bitcoin community continues researching soft fork options for quantum resistance. Historical Context and Previous Quantum Computing Debates Quantum computing threats to cryptography first gained attention in the 1990s. Peter Shor published his groundbreaking algorithm in 1994. This discovery revealed theoretical vulnerabilities in public-key cryptography. However, practical quantum computers remained distant for decades. The cryptocurrency community began serious discussions around 2015. Google’s quantum supremacy announcement in 2019 intensified these debates. Since then, quantum hardware has progressed steadily but incrementally. Previous quantum threat predictions often proved premature. Experts frequently overestimated hardware development timelines. Error correction remains a significant challenge for quantum systems. PsiQuantum’s facility aims to address these technical hurdles directly. The company’s photonic approach may offer advantages in error rates. Nevertheless, building fault-tolerant quantum computers requires unprecedented engineering. Industry Response and Preparedness Measures The cryptocurrency industry has implemented several preparedness measures. Major exchanges conduct regular security audits with quantum considerations. Wallet developers explore quantum-resistant key generation techniques. Research institutions collaborate on post-quantum blockchain solutions. The Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) process includes quantum resistance discussions. Several BIPs address potential migration paths. Academic conferences regularly feature quantum-blockchain security sessions. Funding for quantum-resistant cryptography research has increased substantially. Government agencies coordinate with cryptocurrency developers on standards. This multi-faceted approach aims to ensure preparedness regardless of quantum advancement timelines. Conclusion The PsiQuantum facility groundbreaking has renewed essential discussions about quantum computing threats to Bitcoin. While experts disagree on timelines, consensus exists about eventual vulnerabilities. The cryptocurrency community demonstrates awareness and proactive research. Quantum-resistant solutions continue development alongside quantum hardware advances. The 2028 target for PsiQuantum’s operational facility provides a tangible timeline for preparedness. Bitcoin’s decentralized nature may facilitate adaptive responses to emerging threats. Ongoing monitoring of quantum computing progress remains crucial for blockchain security. The debate highlights the evolving nature of cryptographic assurance in the quantum era. FAQs Q1: How soon could quantum computers threaten Bitcoin? Experts provide varying estimates from 2-3 years to 10-20 years. The timeline depends on quantum hardware development speed and error correction breakthroughs. Most researchers believe practical threats remain years away but recommend gradual preparation. Q2: What makes Bitcoin vulnerable to quantum computing? Bitcoin uses ECDSA cryptography for digital signatures. Quantum algorithms like Shor’s algorithm could theoretically reverse-engineer private keys from public addresses. This would allow unauthorized access to Bitcoin wallets if quantum computers achieve sufficient power. Q3: Is PsiQuantum building its quantum computer to attack Bitcoin? No. PsiQuantum co-founder Terry Rudolph stated in July 2024 that the company would not design its quantum computer for cryptocurrency attacks. The facility aims for general quantum computing applications in materials science, pharmaceuticals, and optimization problems. Q4: Can Bitcoin upgrade to quantum-resistant cryptography? Yes, but it would require a hard fork—a fundamental protocol change requiring community consensus. Researchers explore both hard fork and soft fork options. Several quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms already exist and could potentially integrate with Bitcoin. Q5: Are other cryptocurrencies better prepared for quantum computing? Some newer cryptocurrencies like QANplatform and Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL) implement quantum-resistant features natively. However, they lack Bitcoin’s network size and security history. Most major cryptocurrencies face similar quantum challenges and research solutions. This post Quantum Computing Bitcoin Threat: PsiQuantum Facility Groundbreaking Ignites Critical Security Debate first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
5 Mar 2026, 15:05
Here’s Where XRP Stands Apart In Quantum Computing Risk
As the race to develop powerful quantum computers accelerates, cybersecurity experts have begun examining how the technology could reshape the digital security landscape. The conversation extends far beyond cryptocurrencies. Quantum breakthroughs could potentially challenge the encryption systems that protect global banking networks, military communications, and large portions of the internet. Naturally, this possibility has also sparked questions about the long-term security of blockchain networks. Versan Aljarrah, founder of Black Swan Capitalist, recently explored this issue in a detailed discussion on X, focusing on how different blockchain systems might respond to quantum computing risks. His analysis highlights a crucial point: the challenge is not unique to one cryptocurrency. Instead, it affects nearly every major blockchain currently operating today. Over the last few weeks I’ve been researching quantum computing risk across blockchains, and here’s what I found. The short answer: no blockchain today is fully quantum proof, not Bitcoin, not Ethereum, not XRP. All of them rely on elliptic curve cryptography. In simple terms,… pic.twitter.com/7viyGdiJG9 — Black Swan Capitalist (@VersanAljarrah) March 5, 2026 The Cryptographic Foundation Behind Blockchains Most modern blockchains rely on elliptic curve cryptography, a mathematical framework that secures digital assets through public and private key pairs. A public key allows others to send funds to a wallet, while the private key enables the owner to authorize transactions and control those funds. This system remains extremely secure against traditional computing methods. However, quantum computing introduces a theoretical scenario in which extremely powerful machines could solve complex cryptographic problems much faster than classical computers. If that capability eventually becomes practical, attackers could potentially derive private keys from public keys, undermining the security model used across many digital systems. Importantly, this risk extends far beyond the cryptocurrency industry. Many traditional financial networks, secure communications systems, and internet protocols also rely on similar cryptographic techniques. The Upgrade Challenge for Blockchain Networks If quantum computing advances to the point where it threatens existing encryption systems , blockchain networks will need to transition to quantum-resistant cryptography. This process would require replacing current algorithms with new ones designed to withstand quantum-based attacks. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 For large decentralized networks, such changes can prove complicated. Many blockchains require major software upgrades that involve coordinating developers, node operators, exchanges, and users across the entire ecosystem. In some cases, these changes could require hard forks, which split a network into separate chains if participants fail to reach consensus. XRP’s Protocol-Level Flexibility Aljarrah’s analysis suggests that the XRP Ledger may hold a structural advantage when it comes to adaptability. The network operates through a validator consensus system that governs protocol updates directly at the ledger level. This structure allows validators to approve upgrades without shutting down the network. As a result, the XRP Ledger can evolve through coordinated consensus while continuing to process transactions. In theory, this flexibility could make it easier to implement future cryptographic upgrades if quantum computing eventually threatens existing encryption standards. Preparing for a Post-Quantum Future Despite these architectural differences, experts agree that no major blockchain is currently quantum-proof. Researchers across the technology sector continue developing post-quantum cryptographic algorithms designed to withstand future computational breakthroughs. For now, quantum computers remain far from the scale required to break modern encryption. However, the discussion already influences how developers design next-generation blockchain infrastructure. As Aljarrah emphasized, the critical question may not be whether a network is immune today, but whether it can evolve quickly when tomorrow’s technological threats emerge. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Here’s Where XRP Stands Apart In Quantum Computing Risk appeared first on Times Tabloid .
5 Mar 2026, 14:55
Aave token rebounds as v4 transparency boosts confidence
The Aave token is attempting to break out of a tight trading range as Aave Labs published the full results of its V4 security audits, which involved 345 days of accumulated reviews that found no high-severity vulnerabilities. The March 4 audit report advances the much-contested protocol upgrade just one day after the Marc Zeller-led Aave Chain Initiative (ACI) announced its departure due to escalating governance tension. In a report titled “ Security by Design: Aave V4 ,” Aave Labs detailed a year-long program starting from March 2025 to February 2026, which included deploying 15 researchers across four audit firms, formal verifications, invariant testing, and a six-week public contest. The program cost less than its initial budget of $1.5 million and was funded by the DAO. However, the release of the report comes in the middle of serious tension within the Aave ecosystem. On March 3, ACI announced that it would gradually reduce operations in the next four months due to structural governance issues. That announcement sank the AAVE token as low as $108 before recovering close to $118 as of now. Aave is attempting to sustain a rally to break out into a higher trading range. Source: CoinMarketCap 345 days of reviews found no high-impact vulnerabilities The audit was spread across four audit firms and four independent researchers, making a total of 15 researchers deployed over 275 cumulative audit days. The first round took place between September to November 2025. Certora deployed two researchers who worked for eight weeks, ChainSecurity deployed two researchers for four weeks, Trail of Bits deployed three researchers for two weeks, and Blackthorn deployed four researchers for three weeks. Other independent researchers, including Stermi, Deadrosesecxyz, Josselin, and Kurt Barry, conducted 13 weeks of early-stage reviews, noting that V4 was the “cleanest pre-audit codebase” they had seen. From December 1, Aave Labs held a six-week Sherlock contest, where over 900 verified participants submitted more than 950 findings, yet there were no critical issues found. The second round took place in February, adding 80 more days for fixing validations, with reports confirming no high-impact vulnerabilities came up. Technical excellence but governance problems? The latest V4 audit demonstrated great technical transparency, with Aave Labs publicly sharing their full audit processes, findings and costs, while delivering under their initial budget of $1.5 million with plans to return the remaining funds to the DAO. However, the governance tensions within the project cannot be ignored. The ACI argued that approximately 233,000 votes from Aave Labs-related clusters (including 111,000 votes allegedly delegated by Kulechov) were used to rig the March 1 Temp Check vote to get 52.58% approval. The ACI also suggested four conditions before it could support the proposal (including stricter milestone tracking, self-voting limits, etc), but the conditions were ignored. BGD Labs (who helped build V3) also announced on February 20 that it would not renew its contract with Aave Labs from April 1, effectively ending its four-year tenure as the primary technical contributor. The firm cited centralization concerns and criticized Aave Labs’ approach of aggressively criticizing V3 in order to promote V4. Nonetheless, the “Aave Will Win” proposal still advanced to the ARFC stage following the Temp Check, where structural revisions will be discussed before a binding vote on-chain. V4 ratification will also be included, although it will require a separate proposal of its own. As such, the project now faces losing both its primary technical contributor and its most active governance delegate in the space of a few months. The narrow vote results, legitimacy concerns, and contributor exits create a cloud of uncertainty over V4’s governance. With BGD Labs leaving on April 1st and ACI gradually stopping its operations, questions are being raised over the independent oversight during the V3-V4 transition. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .
