hodler

27 Jan 2026, 12:17

India's Narendra Modi hails 'mother of all deals' as EU free trade agreement is finalized

India and the European Union have officially signed a free trade agreement after nearly twenty years of stalled talks and political back-and-forth. Prime Minister Narendra Modi called it the “mother of all deals” during his speech at India Energy Week on Tuesday. The announcement followed the agreement’s finalization on Monday. The EU bloc, which accounts for around 25% of global GDP and nearly a third of worldwide trade, is now locked into an economic partnership with India. Modi said this deal will sit alongside India’s other trade arrangements with Britain and the European Free Trade Association, tightening India’s global trade network. “This deal will prove to be very supportive to these sectors,” Modi said, pointing directly to textiles, leather, gems and jewelry, and footwear. Trade deal follows decades of stalled negotiations The signing marks the end of a negotiation process that began years ago but got real momentum again in 2022, when both sides decided to give it another go. The delay came down to disagreements on agriculture and automotive trade, areas both sides have been known to protect heavily. Hosuk Lee-Makiyama, director at the European Centre for International Political Economy, said both India and the EU tend to be “very protectionist,” which slowed the talks for years. He said neither India nor the EU had managed to secure major trade deals in recent years, and with the U.S. and China off the table, this might be “one of the best they can get.” The deal creates a trading block covering 2 billion people. The timing is no accident either. With global tensions and supply chain dramas still going on, both India and the EU are betting big on closer economic ties. A joint statement from Modi and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was expected later Tuesday during the India-EU summit in New Delhi, outlining the fine print of the agreement. U.S. criticizes EU for going ahead with India deal The United States wasn’t thrilled. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hit back at the EU for going ahead with a major deal with India while the U.S. still has trade restrictions in place. Speaking on ABC News, Scott said:- “The U.S. has made much bigger sacrifices than Europeans have. We have put 25% tariffs on India for buying Russian oil. Guess what happened last week? The Europeans signed a trade deal with India.” As for Donald Trump, now the 47th president of the United States, he hasn’t said anything publicly yet. But no one in D.C. is expecting applause. Meanwhile, India’s Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri tried to keep the tone neutral when speaking to CNBC. “I would try and look at the positive side,” Puri said, brushing aside concerns about delays. He added that a U.S.-India trade deal is “at a very advanced stage” and suggested, “Everybody needs to chill a bit.” Puri said he was told by officials in the negotiations that the U.S. deal could come soon, though he didn’t give a timeline. He also described India’s relationship with Washington as “very strong,” and claimed that India’s open stance on trade was clear from the EU agreement. “There’s an economic opportunity here for others who want trade deals,” Puri added. “It’s going to be a mutual benefit, not only for the EU but the United States and elsewhere also.” If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

27 Jan 2026, 12:15

American Bitcoin’s Strategic Surge: Eric Trump’s Mining Firm Acquires 416 Additional BTC

BitcoinWorld American Bitcoin’s Strategic Surge: Eric Trump’s Mining Firm Acquires 416 Additional BTC In a significant move highlighting corporate Bitcoin accumulation strategies, American Bitcoin (ABTC) has strategically expanded its digital asset reserves. The mining company, founded by Eric Trump, executed a substantial purchase of 416 BTC, solidifying its position within the competitive cryptocurrency sector. This acquisition, reported by Solid Intel on March 15, 2025, elevates the firm’s total holdings to 5,843 Bitcoin. Consequently, this action reflects broader trends in institutional cryptocurrency adoption and treasury management. American Bitcoin’s Strategic Accumulation American Bitcoin’s latest transaction represents a deliberate corporate treasury strategy. The purchase of 416 BTC follows a period of calculated market observation. Furthermore, the company now controls a treasury worth hundreds of millions of dollars at current valuations. This move aligns with a growing trend among publicly traded firms and private mining operations. Many companies now view Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset, similar to digital gold. The decision likely involved analysis of several key factors: Market Timing: Acquisition during specific price consolidation phases. Cash Flow Management: Using operational profits from mining activities. Long-term Vision: Belief in Bitcoin’s enduring value proposition. Hedging Strategy: Protection against potential fiat currency inflation. Eric Trump established American Bitcoin to leverage renewable energy sources for cryptocurrency mining. The company operates several facilities across the United States. These locations prioritize access to sustainable power, including hydroelectric, solar, and wind energy. This operational focus addresses common environmental criticisms of Bitcoin mining. Therefore, the firm positions itself as a leader in sustainable blockchain infrastructure. Bitcoin Mining Industry Context The cryptocurrency mining sector has undergone substantial consolidation since 2023. Larger, well-capitalized operations continue acquiring smaller competitors. American Bitcoin’s expansion occurs within this competitive landscape. The industry now demands significant capital expenditure for advanced mining hardware and energy contracts. Moreover, regulatory clarity in certain U.S. states has attracted more institutional investment. Recent data from the Bitcoin Mining Council shows improving network efficiency. The global hash rate continues reaching new all-time highs. This indicates robust network security and growing miner commitment. American Bitcoin contributes to this security through its computational power. The following table compares key mining metrics from 2024 to early 2025: Metric Q4 2024 Q1 2025 Global Hash Rate ~550 EH/s ~620 EH/s Network Difficulty Increase of 5% Increase of 8% Estimated Sustainable Energy Mix 58.9% 60.5% Mining companies now function as multifaceted technology firms. They manage energy assets, hardware logistics, and digital treasury management. This evolution requires sophisticated financial and operational expertise. American Bitcoin’s latest purchase demonstrates this integrated approach. The firm balances immediate mining rewards with long-term asset appreciation strategies. Expert Analysis on Treasury Strategies Financial analysts observe that corporate Bitcoin strategies vary significantly. Some companies, like MicroStrategy, pursue aggressive accumulation. Others, like Tesla, have shown more tactical buying and selling. Mining companies possess a unique advantage. They generate Bitcoin directly through block rewards. Therefore, they can choose to hold or sell their production based on market conditions and capital needs. Industry experts cite several reasons for holding Bitcoin on a corporate balance sheet: Inflation Hedge: Protection against monetary debasement policies. Portfolio Diversification: Non-correlation with traditional assets. Technological Bet: Investment in the future of decentralized finance. Shareholder Value: Potential for substantial asset appreciation. The “HODL” strategy, common among individual investors, now appears in corporate finance. American Bitcoin’s growing treasury suggests a strong conviction in this approach. However, companies also face quarterly reporting requirements and volatility scrutiny. This requires careful communication with investors and regulators. The firm’s actions will likely influence other mining operators considering similar treasury policies. Market Impact and Future Implications American Bitcoin’s purchase removes 416 BTC from immediate circulation. This reduces available supply on exchanges. While a single transaction rarely moves the market significantly, it contributes to a larger trend. Institutional accumulation can create sustained upward pressure on prices over time. Additionally, it signals confidence to the broader investment community. The cryptocurrency market remains sensitive to regulatory developments. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues refining its framework for digital assets. Clear rules could encourage more corporate adoption. Conversely, restrictive policies might slow investment. American Bitcoin’s operations fall under existing financial and energy regulations. The company’s compliance demonstrates the sector’s maturation. Looking forward, several factors will shape mining company strategies: The upcoming Bitcoin halving event, reducing block rewards by 50%. Advances in mining hardware efficiency (e.g., next-generation ASICs). Evolution of global energy markets and sustainability mandates. Integration of mining with grid stability and renewable energy projects. American Bitcoin appears well-positioned for these challenges. Its focus on sustainable energy aligns with regulatory and social trends. The firm’s growing BTC treasury provides a financial buffer against market cycles. This strategy may become a blueprint for the next generation of mining enterprises. Conclusion American Bitcoin’s acquisition of 416 BTC marks a strategic expansion of its digital asset reserves. The move by Eric Trump’s mining firm reflects sophisticated corporate treasury management in the cryptocurrency era. With total holdings now at 5,843 Bitcoin, the company strengthens its balance sheet and industry position. This action underscores the maturation of Bitcoin mining from a niche activity to a mainstream financial operation. Furthermore, it highlights the growing convergence of energy innovation, financial strategy, and blockchain technology. The continued accumulation of Bitcoin by institutional players like American Bitcoin signals enduring confidence in the asset’s long-term value and the underlying network’s security. FAQs Q1: What is American Bitcoin (ABTC)? American Bitcoin is a Bitcoin mining company founded by Eric Trump. It focuses on operating mining facilities using sustainable energy sources across the United States. Q2: How much Bitcoin does American Bitcoin now hold? Following its latest purchase of 416 BTC, American Bitcoin’s total holdings have reached 5,843 Bitcoin, as reported in March 2025. Q3: Why do mining companies hold Bitcoin instead of selling it immediately? Mining companies may hold Bitcoin as a strategic treasury asset for long-term appreciation, as an inflation hedge, and to diversify corporate reserves beyond traditional fiat currency. Q4: How does American Bitcoin address environmental concerns related to mining? The company prioritizes operations in locations with access to renewable energy, such as hydroelectric, solar, and wind power, aiming to reduce the carbon footprint of its mining activities. Q5: What impact do large corporate purchases have on the Bitcoin market? While a single purchase may not immediately affect price, consistent institutional accumulation reduces circulating supply on exchanges and can signal strong market confidence, potentially influencing long-term valuation trends. This post American Bitcoin’s Strategic Surge: Eric Trump’s Mining Firm Acquires 416 Additional BTC first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

27 Jan 2026, 12:00

Bitcoin Dropping Sparks Renewed Demand For Early-Stage Plays Like Bitcoin Everlight

Bitcoin fell below $90,000 on Tuesday, triggering $1.09 billion in liquidations across crypto derivatives markets. Approximately 92% of the liquidations came from long positions, indicating how heavily traders were positioned for continued upside before the reversal. The move coincided with renewed tariff threats from Donald Trump and a sell-off in Japanese government bonds that pushed global yields higher. As leverage was forcibly removed and spot participation slowed, capital began rotating away from crowded directional exposure and into early-stage crypto projects where entry pricing is defined by issuance mechanics, including Bitcoin Everlight. Liquidations Force A Reset In Positioning The liquidation imbalance highlighted the fragility of recent market structure. Long exposure dominated open interest, leaving little margin for price compression once momentum faded. When selling accelerated, forced closures amplified downside movement and reduced near-term risk appetite across the market. After events like this, capital deployment tends to change shape. Short-term traders reduce size or step aside entirely, while longer-horizon participants look for exposure that does not depend on immediate price recovery. Early-stage projects often see renewed interest during these periods because entry pricing is set by issuance mechanics rather than market momentum. Bitcoin Everlight has drawn attention in this context as participants reassess where exposure sits following the leverage unwind. Bitcoin Everlight’s Transaction Architecture Bitcoin Everlight is designed as a transaction-routing layer anchored directly to Bitcoin. Transactions are routed through lightweight nodes that validate activity and anchor it to Bitcoin without the use of channels, bilateral exposure, or liquidity balancing. There are no channels to open, no locked liquidity to manage, and no dependency on counterparties maintaining balances. This structure keeps transaction routing separate from liquidity management. During volatile conditions, systems that avoid locked capital and bilateral exposure tend to maintain more stable participation, as operators are not forced to adjust positions in response to market swings. Network operation remains focused on routing and validation rather than liquidity provision. Node Economics And Network Participation Node operators earn variable rewards within a 4–8% range, based on uptime, routing contribution, and performance metrics. Rewards fluctuate with measurable activity and network reliability. Participation centers on maintaining infrastructure availability and transaction routing capacity. Because rewards are tied to performance instead of capital deployment, operators are not exposed to liquidity shocks or counterparty risk. This approach supports consistent network operation during periods when market conditions discourage capital-intensive participation elsewhere. Supply Discipline And Allocation Logic Bitcoin Everlight uses a fixed supply of 21,000,000,000 BTCL, with allocation defined at launch. 45% of supply is distributed through the public presale, 20% allocated to node rewards, 15% to liquidity, 10% to the team, and 10% to ecosystem and treasury functions. Team and ecosystem allocations remain locked for longer periods than presale tokens, limiting early circulating supply once trading begins. Node rewards are drawn from a predefined pool rather than ongoing emissions, keeping supply expansion predictable. This structure establishes clear constraints around availability during the early stages of network operation, which becomes more relevant when market conditions are driven by macro pressure rather than protocol-level issues. Presale Structure, Oversight, And Timing The Bitcoin Everlight presale is divided into 20 phases, each distributing 472,500,000 BTCL. Phase 1 pricing is set at $0.0008. Tokens are delivered as ERC-20 assets at launch, followed by a planned migration to the project’s native chain. Vesting is paced, with internal allocations locked longer than public distributions to prevent early internal supply from entering the market during initial liquidity formation. Presale contracts and infrastructure have undergone third-party review by SolidProof and Spywolf , covering contract logic, supply limits, and deployment integrity. Team identity verification has been completed through Spywolf KYC and Vital Block , establishing external accountability during the presale period. With leverage clearing from the system and volatility reshaping risk allocation, BTCL is available through the current presale ahead of mainnet, offering entry pricing defined by issuance schedule while broader markets adjust to tighter financial conditions. Website: https://bitcoineverlight.com/ Security: https://bitcoineverlight.com/security How to Buy: https://bitcoineverlight.com/articles/how-to-buy-bitcoin-everlight-btcl

27 Jan 2026, 11:57

Global economy under pressure as G7 nations debt exceed annual GDP

The problem of overwhelming debt has shifted. While poor countrie s st ruggled with this burden for years, the threat now comes from some of the world’s wealthiest nations. Countries including the United States, Britain, France, Italy and Japan are carrying unprecedented or near-unprecedented levels of debt. This creates risks that could slow economic progress and destabilize financial markets worldwide. Rising costs leave governments with fewer options The constant need for additional financing has raised the cost of borrowing itself, consuming larger portions of tax revenue. These elevated rates spill over into business financing, personal loans, vehicle purchases, home mortgages and credit card interest. They can also fuel rising prices. The most troubling aspect is that accumulating debt during periods of economic strength and low unemployment, as seen in the United States , leaves governments with fewer options when conditions deteriorate. “You want to be able to spend big and spend fast when you need to,” explained Kenneth Rogoff, an economics professor at Harvard. During last week’s World Economic Forum gathering in Davos, President Trump dominated headlines, yet finance ministers privately worried about funding growing requirements. Government borrowing during prosperous times with favorable rates can fuel expansion, while emergency borrowing during crises can maintain spending levels. The surge in debt began during the 2008 financial collapse and economic downturn, when governments provided relief to troubled households as tax collections dropped. Emergency measures during the Covid-19 outbreak, as economies halted and medical expenses soared, pushed obligations higher as rates climbed faster than economic expansion. Yet debt amounts never decreased. Currently, six nations within the wealthy Group of 7 have national obligations matching or surpassing their yearly economic production, based on International Monetary Fund data. Aging populations and infrastructure demands strain budgets Growing numbers of countries face pressure from population trends and sluggish expansion. Across Europe , Britain and Japan, older populations have increased government healthcare and retirement expenses while reducing the workforce that generates essential tax income. A year-long examination commissioned by the European Union’s leadership determine d th e 27-nation group must allocate an extra $900 billion toward priorities including artificial intelligence, interconnected energy systems, supercomputing capabilities and advanced workforce development to maintain competitiveness. Britain requires at least 300 billion pounds ($410 billion) for infrastructure improvements across the coming decade, according to Future Governance Forum, a London research organization. Additional billions are necessary to strengthen its struggling National Health Service. Attempts to reduce public expenditures in Italy, where obligations equal 138% of economic output, through healthcare, education and service reductions, or in France through retirement age increases, have triggered fierce public opposition. France, experiencing months of political gridlock over budget matters, received a sovereign debt downgrade last autumn, prompting concerns about the nation’s financial reliability. Simultaneously, global conditions have grown more hazardous. Friction between China and the United States has intensified. Europe confronts an increasingly hostile Russia and an antagonistic American president. Japan’s election announcement rattles global markets Tokyo’s obligations are already overwhelming. They exceed the nation’s yearly economic production by more than double. The possibility of deeper financial trouble expanded last week when Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi unexpectedly announced a snap election. Both Ms. Takaichi’s Liberal Democrats and rival parties are pledging spending increases and tax reductions. Ms. Takaichi, specifically, has suggested halting the consumption tax on food and nonalcoholic drinks, which the Finance Ministry calculates would cost over $30 billion yearly. “Movement remains cautious due to financial instability concerns”, said Harvard’s Mr. Rogoff. Japan has “stuffed debt into every orifice of the financial sector, pension funds, insurance companies, banks. And there are inflation pressures. ” Low rates combined with elevated inflation particularly damage working and middle-income households, whose savings lose value. Ms. Takaichi’s declaration unsettled investors. Last week, the 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield climbed to its highest point since August. Ken Griffin, who leads hedge fund giant Citadel, described the selloff as an “explicit warning” to other heavily indebted countries like the United States, observing that even the globe’s most powerful economy faces risks. Confidence in U.S. creditworthiness wavered briefly last April, when Trump’s rapid tariff reversals caused Treasury yields to spike suddenly. U.S. national obligations now stand at $38 trillion, approximately 125% of the American economy’s size. Analysts anticipate midterm elections will encourage the White House toward greater spending next year. This month, Trump pledged further military spending increases to $1.5 trillion over the upcoming fiscal year, which the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projected would add $5.8 trillion to national debt, including interest, across 10 years. Net interest charges have tripled during the past five years, reaching approximately $1 trillion. They currently consume 15% of U.S. spending, the second largest expense behind Social Security. Mr. Gale, who recently co-authored research on U.S. debt , cautioned that continued debt growth prospects threaten the country’s position as an economic leader and weaken investor confidence in Treasury bonds and the dollar. It also burdens future generations. As Mr. Gale stated, “the more you consume now, the less you can consume later. “ Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

27 Jan 2026, 11:47

Black Swan Capital: XRP Will Play a Central Role In The Coming Financial Reset

Versan Aljarrah, founder of Black Swan Capitalist, has shared a detailed assessment explaining why he believes a global financial reset is approaching and why gold and XRP are positioned to play distinct but complementary roles in that transition. In his statement, Aljarrah argues that current economic pressures cannot be understood in isolation, as several long-term cycles are reaching their limits. According to him, this convergence provides the clearest signal yet that the existing financial structure is approaching a decisive shift. Aljarrah points first to what he describes as the end of a 100-year global debt cycle. He states that governments around the world are heavily burdened by debt, with interest costs accelerating and policy tools losing effectiveness. In his view, the scale of indebtedness has reached a point where conventional responses no longer resolve underlying imbalances, increasing stress across national balance sheets. How do I know a financial reset is coming, and why Ripple (XRP) is positioned to play a central role alongside gold? Because we’re at the end of multiple measurable cycles simultaneously. We’re at the end of a 100-year global debt cycle. Governments are buried in debt, interest… — Black Swan Capitalist (@VersanAljarrah) January 25, 2026 Dollar Dominance and Monetary Strain Alongside the debt cycle, Aljarrah highlights the strain on the post-war monetary system, which he characterizes as a roughly 60-year structure centered on U.S. dollar dominance and an expanding derivatives market. He argues that this system now depends on increasing leverage to function, creating systemic fragility rather than stability. According to Aljarrah, this dynamic signals that the current framework is approaching its limits. He further notes that central banks are responding in familiar ways ahead of major monetary transitions. Aljarrah emphasizes that central banks are accumulating gold, not as a speculative asset, but as a stabilizing reserve. He frames gold as a long-standing anchor of trust during periods when confidence in paper-based systems weakens, suggesting this role remains unchanged despite technological advances. Settlement, Multipolarity, and XRP’s Role Aljarrah stresses that the coming reset is not only about preserving value but also about efficiently moving it. He describes a shift from a unipolar global order to a multipolar one, where trade relationships are fragmenting, sanctions are increasingly used as policy tools, and globalization is being reorganized. In this environment, he argues that no single nation can reliably serve as the central settlement authority for global trade. Within this context, Aljarrah positions XRP as a tool designed to address settlement challenges. He points to its fast transaction finality, liquidity efficiency, and ability to operate across currencies and jurisdictions. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 According to his explanation, XRP functions as a neutral bridge for value transfer when trust between nations is limited. He contrasts this with gold’s role, stating that while gold preserves value on balance sheets, it does not facilitate large-scale, modern settlement. An Observation, Not a Forecast Aljarrah concludes that gold and XRP are not in competition, but instead fulfill different functions within the same systemic transition. He emphasizes that his view is not presented as a prediction, but as an observation formed over years of analysis. He adds that he has maintained this position for eight years, acknowledging that while the timing has taken longer than expected, the underlying thesis remains unchanged. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Black Swan Capital: XRP Will Play a Central Role In The Coming Financial Reset appeared first on Times Tabloid .

27 Jan 2026, 11:33

South Korean authorities consider approvals for domestic stablecoin issuers

On January 26, Bank of Korea Governor Lee Chang-young said that the authorities are allowing South Korean citizens to invest in virtual assets due to market pressure. However, he mentioned that financial regulators are considering creating a new registration system to enable domestic institutions to use virtual assets. Speaking at the Asian Financial Forum in Hong Kong, Chang-young believes that tokenized deposits would be used more for domestic payments. In contrast, won-denominated stablecoins would be used for international transactions. He stressed that stablecoins remain controversial in South Korea. He voiced concern that won-denominated stablecoins, particularly when paired with U.S. dollar stablecoins , could be used to circumvent capital flow control measures if they are introduced. Additionally, he said that U.S. dollar stablecoins are easily accessible, frequently used, and have much lower transaction costs than using U.S. dollars directly. Chang-young highlights the risks and challenges of stablecoin regulation Chang-young stated that large-scale cash transfers may result from money flowing into U.S. dollar stablecoins when exchange rate changes trigger market expectations. Furthermore, he claimed that regulation is challenging because various non-bank institutions issue stablecoins. He continued by stating that retail central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) do not offer significant advantages and that South Korea’s quick payment system is highly developed. Chang-young asserted that the central bank is deploying tokenized deposits and wholesale CBDCs concurrently with pilot programs to preserve a two-tier structure. Chang-young also believes that loosening and streamlining rules will boost actual economic activity in the near future. Still, he warned against forgetting the consequences of the 2008 financial crisis and contends that reform shouldn’t turn into a contest to lower standards. He believes regulations should be tightened, not loosened, at least in the area of digital banking. Governor Chang-young’s warnings help explain why progress on crypto legislation has stalled. Tech in Asia, a news outlet, reported on January 26 that South Korea has delayed the second phase of the virtual asset law, which aims to regulate digital assets such as stablecoins, amid disagreements over who should be allowed to issue them and how exchanges should be regulated. This delay of the second-phase virtual asset began last year. On December 30, deep regulatory disagreements over stablecoin monitoring led South Korea to postpone its long-awaited revision of its digital asset system to this year. To create a thorough legal framework for cryptocurrency activity, the Financial Services Commission made the Digital Asset Basic Act. The law sought to establish no-fault liability, allowing operators of digital assets to be held accountable for user losses even in the absence of evidence of negligence. The Digital Asset Basic Act aims to improve compliance standards among exchanges and service providers by imposing stricter disclosure requirements and customer protection measures. However, authorities struggled to resolve disputes over control of reserves, enforcement authority, and stablecoin governance. As a result, the bill’s filing was postponed until 2026. Regulators suggested mandating that issuers keep all of their reserves in government bonds or bank deposits, entirely entrusted to authorized custodians. The Bank of Korea argued that stablecoins should be issued only by bank-controlled consortia with at least a 51% ownership stake to preserve monetary stability. As previously reported by Crptopoiltan, fixed ownership thresholds were, however, challenged by the Financial Services Commission (FSC), which cautioned that they may marginalize tech companies and impede innovation in digital finance. Regulatory disputes stall South Korea’s stablecoin legislation The Financial Services Commission’s filing with the National Assembly was supposed to be reviewed this month, but has been delayed again due to ongoing disagreements among government agencies, business stakeholders, and political organizations. According to the report, essential questions remain whether banks or other approved companies should be the primary issuers of won-pegged stablecoins and whether regulations separating finance from virtual assets should be loosened to promote innovation. Critics argue that the proposed 15%–20% shareholding limitations for exchange stockholders are too restrictive. Discussions about virtual asset transactions by listed businesses and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that rely on the law’s implementation have stalled due to the delay. Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program