hodler

1 Apr 2026, 12:17

Russia restricts Telegram as crypto community seeks alternatives

Russia has been trying to restrict access to Telegram for several weeks now and the country’s crypto community is struggling to find a decent substitute. After an initial slowdown, attempts to block the messenger started ahead of a reported April 1 deadline for the messenger’s compliance with Moscow’s requirements. Telegram users in Russia report issues with the service Russian authorities have been ramping up pressure on Telegram for months under the pretext that the messaging app is not complying with local rules, most notably regarding the removal of content prohibited in the country. Voice calls through the platform were limited in August 2025, with regulators claiming it had become a favorite tool for fraudsters, extremists and cybercriminals. Last month, Russia’s telecom watchdog, Roskomnadzor (RKN), began slowing down traffic to the messenger, again citing non-compliance with Russian law. In mid-February, the Telegram channel Baza revealed that the agency, which also acts as a media censor, intends to commence the full blocking of the messaging service on the first day of April. The RKN neither confirmed, nor denied reports quoting the post . However, user signals about difficulties from across the vast country started mounting well ahead of that deadline to meet government demands, as reported by Cryptopolitan. Websites like Detector404.ru and Cбой.рф have been receiving a flow of reports of network failures and other issues with both the mobile app and the desktop version affecting various features. Spikes were registered throughout the past several weeks, including on Wednesday. As of the time of writing, Detector404 has received at least 5,500 reports in the past 24 hours. According to data compiled by the Open Observatory of Network Interference (OONI), a global platform tracking online censorship, anomalies increased in mid-March and Russian internet service providers began actively blocking Telegram on March 20. Yet, the messenger’s estimated availability in Russia remained at around 40% by the end of the month, as noted by the leading Russian crypto news outlet Bits.media. The percentage represents the share of users who could still reach the service without means to circumvent restrictions. Is there a Telegram alternative for Russian crypto enthusiasts? Telegram became Russia’s most popular messenger this year, with over 95 million active users in January, overtaking Meta’s WhatsApp, which has been blocked since the RKN removed its domain from its DNS servers. In February, founder Pavel Durov accused Moscow of trying “to force its citizens to switch to a state-controlled app built for surveillance and political censorship.” He was likely referring to Russia’s so-called “national messenger” Max, which already has over 100 million users, according to stats quoted by official media, including a daily audience of 70 million. However, finding an independent and viable alternative to Telegram is not an easy task. Russia has already banned a number of other platforms such as Viber, Signal and Discord. Instead, members of the crypto community have been looking for ways to maintain communication through their favorite messenger by employing tools to bypass restrictions such as VPNs. “There’s little point in jumping between messengers. Others will also be at risk of being blocked as they become more popular,” commented Bits.media founder Ivan Tikhonov, who recommended that crypto projects take into consideration where their audience is. Some believe there’s hardly a substitute for Telegram, mainly because of the ecosystem built around the messaging platform, including mini apps and bots. According to Sarkis Darbinyan, co-founder of Roskomsvoboda, a Russian NGO resisting internet censorship, Telegram is hard to replace due to its convenience and functionality, although platforms like the decentralized, open-source Deltachat offer anonymous messaging, too. “I like Matrix and its client Element, I like Deltachat. But for bots, there’s no better platform than Telegram,” added the lawyer who is not convinced one should rush to change apps. Darbinyan also quoted an estimate, according to which almost a third of the Russian internet users already had a VPN last year, and by the end of this one their share may reach 50%. Telegram has been widely used not just by ordinary Russian citizens and businesses, but also state agencies like Roskomnadzor itself. Its numerous information channels have become an invaluable news source. A recent report revealed Russian authorities have been thwarting protests in defense of Telegram. Officials have previously indicated the messenger may continue to operate in the country if it complies with all its requirements. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

1 Apr 2026, 11:41

Australia Passes Crypto Licensing Law, Tightening Rules for Digital Asset Platforms

Australia has passed a new digital assets bill that will require many crypto platforms to hold a financial services license, marking one of the country’s clearest moves yet to bring the sector under mainstream financial regulation. The Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025 passed both houses of Parliament and now sets a licensing standard for businesses that hold digital assets for consumers. Under the framework, companies operating as digital asset platforms or tokenized custody platforms will need an Australian Financial Services Licence. The law adds a new layer of oversight for crypto firms that already face anti money laundering and know your customer obligations. It also places digital asset businesses more directly within Australia’s existing financial system instead of creating a separate crypto rulebook. New licensing rules target custody and consumer protection The new law focuses on firms that hold customer digital assets. Treasury said the framework closes a gap that had allowed some businesses to hold unlimited client assets without equivalent safeguards under financial services law. Licensed platforms will need to meet a range of obligations. These include acting efficiently, honestly and fairly, maintaining governance and risk controls, giving users clear information about how assets are stored, and offering dispute resolution and compensation arrangements. Treasury also included an exemption for smaller operators. Platforms holding less than A$5,000 per customer and processing less than A$10 million in annual transactions will not fall under the licensing requirement, according to the government’s outline. Australia adds crypto oversight on top of AML rules The new law does not replace Australia’s existing anti money laundering framework . Instead, it works alongside AUSTRAC rules that already apply to some digital asset services and will expand further from July 1, 2026. That means many firms may soon face two separate compliance tracks. First, they may need to meet AUSTRAC obligations for services such as crypto exchange, custody, and transfers. Then, if they fall within the new legal categories, they may also need an AFSL under the Corporations Act. The bill reflects Australia’s broader push to replace fragmented crypto oversight with a clearer legal structure. Officials said the aim is to support innovation while strengthening consumer protections after a series of global crypto failures. Industry participants will now watch for the next stage, including final assent, transition periods, and detailed guidance on how the rules will apply in practice.

1 Apr 2026, 11:30

Uniswap Foundation’s $85.8M Treasury Reveals Strategic Strength Ahead of Crucial Governance Overhaul

BitcoinWorld Uniswap Foundation’s $85.8M Treasury Reveals Strategic Strength Ahead of Crucial Governance Overhaul In a significant disclosure from the decentralized finance sector, the Uniswap Foundation reported holding a substantial $85.8 million in assets at the close of 2025. This financial snapshot, sourced from official reporting and covered by CoinDesk, provides a critical look at the war chest supporting one of Web3’s most influential protocols. The revelation comes at a pivotal moment, immediately preceding the foundation’s ambitious “UNIfication” governance overhaul. Consequently, this data offers stakeholders and the broader market unparalleled insight into the operational runway and strategic capacity of a leading decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). Uniswap Foundation’s 2025 Financial Composition The foundation’s $85.8 million in assets represents a diversified and strategically balanced treasury. According to the report, the holdings consist of cash, stablecoins, UNI tokens, and Ethereum (ETH). This asset mix is a common and prudent strategy for DAO treasuries, balancing liquidity, stability, and protocol-aligned growth. For instance, stablecoins provide immediate operational liquidity, while the native UNI token holdings demonstrate a long-term commitment to the ecosystem’s success. Furthermore, holding ETH offers exposure to the broader Ethereum network, upon which Uniswap is built. This composition directly supports the foundation’s dual mandate: funding ongoing development and incentivizing ecosystem growth while maintaining a buffer against market volatility. Analyzing the foundation’s recent expenditures adds crucial context to its financial health. Last year, the entity committed $26 million in new grants, a clear signal of its aggressive investment in the Uniswap ecosystem’s future. However, it only disbursed $11 million of that commitment, indicating a pipeline of funded projects yet to be completed. Simultaneously, the foundation spent $9.7 million on its own operating costs. This spending pattern highlights a deliberate, staged approach to capital deployment, ensuring funds are released as project milestones are met rather than in a single lump sum. The Strategic Runway and Allocated Capital Perhaps the most critical figure for long-term sustainability is the foundation’s financial runway, which it expects to last until January 2027. This projection is based on existing allocations of $106.2 million for future grants and $26.3 million earmarked for operations and incentives. A runway of this length provides significant stability and planning certainty. It allows the foundation to execute multi-year strategic initiatives without the constant pressure of fundraising. For comparison, many early-stage tech startups and even traditional non-profits operate on runways of 18-24 months, making the Uniswap Foundation’s position notably robust. This extended timeline is especially vital as the protocol navigates the complex and potentially costly process of a governance migration. Contextualizing the “UNIfication” Governance Overhaul The financial report explicitly notes that this data serves as a baseline before the “UNIfication” governance overhaul. This planned structural change aims to streamline decision-making and potentially enhance the protocol’s responsiveness and efficiency. The process will involve establishing a new legal entity referred to as DUNI. Major governance changes in decentralized protocols often require substantial resources for legal counsel, technical development, community outreach, and security audits. Therefore, the foundation’s strong treasury position is not merely a static figure; it is the essential fuel for this impending transformation. A well-funded foundation can manage this transition smoothly, minimizing disruption to the protocol’s daily operations and user experience. The evolution of DAO treasury management has become a central topic in decentralized finance. Protocols like Uniswap, Compound, and Aave now manage treasuries worth hundreds of millions, even billions, of dollars. Their strategies—ranging from conservative asset holding to sophisticated on-chain yield generation—are closely watched as blueprints for Web3 organizational finance. The Uniswap Foundation’s approach, with its clear allocations for grants, operations, and a multi-year runway, reflects a mature, institutional-grade mindset. It prioritizes predictable sustainability over aggressive, high-risk treasury farming, which aligns with its role as a steward for a critical piece of public infrastructure. Expert Analysis on DAO Treasury Strategy Industry observers often emphasize that a DAO’s treasury strength directly correlates with its ability to innovate and withstand market cycles. A substantial treasury allows a foundation to fund public goods, sponsor research, and reward developers without diluting token holders through excessive inflation. The Uniswap Foundation’s report indicates it is operating within this framework. By allocating specific sums for grants, it directly funds the innovation that keeps the Uniswap protocol competitive. Meanwhile, its operational budget covers the essential, but less glamorous, work of governance facilitation, legal compliance, and partnership development. This balanced financial strategy supports both explosive growth and long-term resilience. Implications for the UNI Token and DeFi Ecosystem The foundation’s holdings of UNI and ETH are particularly noteworthy for token holders and market analysts. A foundation holding its native token demonstrates a powerful alignment of interests; its success is tied to the token’s utility and value. However, it also introduces considerations about potential market impacts if those tokens were ever sold. The report’s transparency helps mitigate such concerns by providing visibility into the foundation’s plans and runway, suggesting no urgent need for large-scale asset liquidation. For the broader DeFi ecosystem, a well-funded Uniswap Foundation is a net positive. It ensures continued development and security for one of the sector’s most vital liquidity hubs, which in turn supports thousands of other projects, tokens, and users. The timeline from this financial snapshot to the execution of “UNIfication” will be a critical period to watch. Stakeholders will monitor how efficiently the allocated capital is deployed to achieve governance milestones. Key performance indicators will include the completion rate of grant-funded projects, the growth of protocol metrics like total value locked (TVL) and fee generation, and the smoothness of the transition to the DUNI entity. The foundation’s financial discipline, as evidenced by this report, suggests it is well-positioned to manage this complex process. Its ability to balance immediate operational needs with long-term strategic investments will likely be a case study for other DAOs. Conclusion The Uniswap Foundation’s disclosure of an $85.8 million treasury at the end of 2025 is more than a simple balance sheet update. It is a strategic statement of stability and intent. This financial strength provides the essential foundation for the upcoming “UNIfication” governance overhaul, ensuring the process is well-resourced and deliberate. With a clear runway into 2027 and structured allocations for grants and operations, the foundation demonstrates a mature, sustainable approach to managing one of DeFi’s most important ecosystems. As the protocol evolves, this robust treasury will remain a cornerstone of its ability to innovate, govern effectively, and maintain its leadership position in the decentralized finance landscape. FAQs Q1: What assets make up the Uniswap Foundation’s $85.8 million treasury? The treasury is composed of a diversified mix including cash, stablecoins (like USDC or DAI), the native UNI token, and Ethereum (ETH). This blend ensures liquidity, stability, and alignment with the ecosystem’s growth. Q2: How long is the Uniswap Foundation’s financial runway? Based on its current allocations and spending rate, the foundation projects its financial runway will extend until January 2027, providing over two years of operational certainty. Q3: What is the “UNIfication” governance overhaul mentioned in the report? “UNIfication” refers to a planned major restructuring of the Uniswap protocol’s governance model. It involves creating a new legal entity called DUNI and aims to streamline decision-making processes for the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). Q4: How much did the foundation spend on grants and operations last year? In the reported period, the Uniswap Foundation committed $26 million to new grants, disbursed $11 million, and spent $9.7 million on its own operating costs. Q5: Why is the foundation’s treasury size important for UNI token holders? A strong, well-managed treasury means the foundation can fund development, security, and growth without immediate pressure to sell its UNI token holdings. This supports long-term value alignment and reduces potential sell-side pressure on the token market. This post Uniswap Foundation’s $85.8M Treasury Reveals Strategic Strength Ahead of Crucial Governance Overhaul first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

1 Apr 2026, 10:20

BTC Price Hits $69K Resistance in Last-Gasp Rally: Sustainable Momentum or Last Dice Throw? (April 1 Update)

Bitcoin followed world stock markets to the upside on Tuesday as US president Trump let it be known that the war could end in two to three weeks. However, with both the S&P 500 and Bitcoin ending the day at strong resistances, will the main corrective moves now resume? Big bounce in S&P 500, but resistance met Source: TradingView The S&P 500 in the weekly time frame shows a rounded top after reaching the upper limit of an 8 year channel. The index came all the way down to the mid section of the channel before a strong bounce higher of nearly 3% on Tuesday. Now that the price has come back and tagged the most important resistance level, it remains to be seen whether the bulls can battle back above it. With the Stochastic RSI in prime position for that bounce, and the possibility of an end to the Middle Eastern conflict, there is certainly the potential for a break back above. That said, there is still the prospect of the price rejecting from here before coming back to confirm the mid channel line as support, or even to the horizontal support at 6,100. Critical resistances met - rejection more likely? Source: TradingView There is a lot going on in the short-term chart for the $BTC price . Firstly, counter to Tuesday morning expectations , the price did rally back into the bull flag, broke through a descending trendline, climbed back above the neckline of the head and shoulders pattern, and got as far as the major $69K horizontal resistance , from where it has so far been rejected. Since then, the price has fallen back below the head and shoulders neckline, and may be in the process of being rejected from here as well, turning this into a confirmation of the pattern rather than negating it. If one looks at the Stochastic RSI indicators in this 4-hour time frame, it is perhaps suggesting that the lengthy 3-day stay at the top might be over, and that momentum could start to fall off from here. How far can the bulls go? Source: TradingView The daily chart illustrates the amount of resistance that the $BTC price is experiencing right now. Firstly, there is the major horizontal level at $69,000. Then there is the neckline of the head and shoulders pattern, and finally, the 50-day SMA is also adding its weight to the resistance . If the bulls can push the price up through this they will have the descending bear market trendline waiting for them, and after all that, the price would still be in the midst of the bear flag. If news out of the Middle East starts to become more positive through the rest of this week, who knows how far the bulls can go? That said, as it stands, a rejection from the current level looks like the more probable outcome. Mixed signals in weekly time frame Source: TradingView The weekly chart gives an intriguing view of the situation. Either the $BTC price is going to break back above the $69K major resistance and through the bear market downtrend, or the bulls are going to fail here and the price will drop out of the bottom of the bear flag and head to the next big level to the downside. The rest of this week really is crucial. $66K and the bottom of the bear flag have to hold. The Stochastic RSI is showing that the indicators do seem to be rolling over , while the RSI indicator is poking its head through the downtrend line . Every time previously that the downtrend broke, this led to a big upside rally. These mixed signals add to the complexity of the decisions that retail, as well as institutional investors, might need to make. It has to be remembered that the bears are still in control. Will this still be the case at the end of this week? Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

1 Apr 2026, 09:25

US Tax Refunds Deliver Disappointing Growth Boost as Standard Chartered Reveals Limited Economic Impact

BitcoinWorld US Tax Refunds Deliver Disappointing Growth Boost as Standard Chartered Reveals Limited Economic Impact Recent analysis from Standard Chartered reveals a concerning trend for the US economy in 2025, as tax refunds provide only limited stimulus for broader economic growth despite substantial dollar amounts returning to consumers. This development comes at a critical juncture for policymakers seeking sustainable expansion pathways. US Tax Refunds Show Limited Economic Growth Impact Standard Chartered economists have published comprehensive research indicating that 2025 US tax refunds are generating disappointing economic momentum. The bank’s analysis, based on consumer spending patterns and macroeconomic modeling, suggests refund dollars are circulating through the economy with reduced multiplier effects compared to previous years. Consequently, the traditional spring spending surge appears significantly muted this fiscal cycle. Several structural factors contribute to this diminished impact. First, changing consumer priorities have altered spending behaviors. Second, persistent inflation concerns continue to influence financial decisions. Third, economic uncertainty prompts more conservative household budgeting. These elements combine to reduce the velocity of refund money through the broader economy. Consumer Spending Patterns Shift Dramatically The Standard Chartered research identifies clear behavioral changes among American taxpayers receiving refunds. Historically, these funds fueled discretionary purchases and debt reduction. However, current data reveals different allocation patterns emerging in 2025. Refund Allocation Analysis Standard Chartered’s survey of 2,500 US households receiving tax refunds shows these primary uses: Essential expenses: 42% of recipients allocate refunds to necessary costs Debt repayment: 28% prioritize credit card or loan reduction Savings increases: 18% direct funds to emergency or retirement accounts Discretionary spending: Only 12% use refunds for non-essential purchases This distribution represents a significant departure from pre-pandemic patterns, where discretionary spending typically captured 25-30% of refund dollars. The shift toward essential expenses and debt reduction explains much of the reduced economic stimulus effect. Comparative Historical Context and Trends Examining tax refund impacts over the past decade reveals important contextual patterns. The table below illustrates changing economic multiplier effects: Year Average Refund Amount Estimated Economic Multiplier Primary Spending Category 2015 $2,860 1.8x Retail purchases 2018 $2,895 1.6x Home improvements 2021 $3,268 1.4x Debt repayment 2023 $3,054 1.3x Essential expenses 2025 $3,112 1.1x Essential expenses The declining multiplier effect demonstrates diminishing economic returns from tax refund distributions. Standard Chartered economists attribute this trend to multiple converging factors including inflation persistence, wage stagnation in certain sectors, and changing consumer confidence levels. Macroeconomic Implications and Policy Considerations The limited growth boost from tax refunds carries significant implications for broader economic policy. Federal Reserve officials monitor these spending patterns closely when assessing consumer strength and inflation trajectories. Similarly, Congressional budget analysts incorporate refund spending data into fiscal projections. Standard Chartered’s research suggests several policy-relevant findings. First, traditional economic models may overestimate consumer response to fiscal stimuli. Second, household financial pressures continue influencing economic behaviors substantially. Third, targeted policy interventions might prove more effective than broad-based approaches. Expert Analysis and Economic Forecasting Sarah Chen, Standard Chartered’s Head of North American Economics, explains the research implications clearly. “Our analysis reveals fundamental shifts in how American households utilize fiscal windfalls,” Chen states. “The declining economic multiplier suggests policymakers should reconsider traditional stimulus mechanisms.” The bank’s economic team emphasizes several forward-looking considerations. They project continued conservative spending patterns through 2026 absent significant economic improvements. Additionally, they note potential implications for retail sectors traditionally benefiting from refund seasons. Finally, they highlight possible effects on GDP growth projections for upcoming quarters. Regional Variations and Demographic Differences Standard Chartered’s research identifies important geographic and demographic variations in refund utilization. Southern and Midwestern states show slightly higher discretionary spending rates than coastal regions. Similarly, younger taxpayers demonstrate different allocation patterns compared to older cohorts. These variations suggest localized economic impacts despite the broader national trend. Regions with higher essential spending allocations may experience reduced local economic stimulation. Conversely, areas with greater discretionary spending could see modest retail sector benefits. Conclusion Standard Chartered’s comprehensive analysis confirms that US tax refunds provide limited economic growth boost in 2025, representing a significant departure from historical patterns. The research highlights changing consumer behaviors, persistent financial pressures, and reduced fiscal multiplier effects. These findings carry important implications for economic policymakers, business planners, and financial analysts monitoring American consumer strength and broader economic trajectories. FAQs Q1: What does Standard Chartered’s research reveal about 2025 tax refunds? Standard Chartered’s analysis shows US tax refunds are providing limited economic growth stimulus in 2025, with reduced multiplier effects compared to previous years due to changing consumer spending patterns. Q2: How are consumers spending their tax refunds differently in 2025? Consumers are allocating more refund dollars to essential expenses and debt repayment while reducing discretionary spending, with only 12% using refunds for non-essential purchases according to the research. Q3: What is the economic multiplier effect for 2025 tax refunds? The estimated economic multiplier for 2025 tax refunds is approximately 1.1x, significantly lower than the 1.8x multiplier observed in 2015, indicating reduced economic stimulation per refund dollar. Q4: How does this research affect economic policy considerations? The findings suggest traditional economic models may overestimate consumer response to fiscal stimuli, potentially necessitating more targeted policy approaches rather than broad-based mechanisms. Q5: Are there regional differences in how tax refunds are spent? Yes, Standard Chartered’s research identifies geographic variations, with Southern and Midwestern states showing slightly higher discretionary spending rates compared to coastal regions. This post US Tax Refunds Deliver Disappointing Growth Boost as Standard Chartered Reveals Limited Economic Impact first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

1 Apr 2026, 08:17

XRP’s Big Moment? Evernorth Says CLARITY Act Could Open the Floodgates

CLARITY Act Could Ignite Institutional Floodgates for XRP Adoption Evernorth is making a strong case that the proposed CLARITY Act could mark a pivotal shift , not just in crypto regulation, but in XRP’s path to real-world adoption. At the heart of its argument is one key factor touching on legal certainty. If enacted, the bill could formally classify XRP as a commodity under U.S. law, ending years of regulatory ambiguity. Well, this clarity isn’t trivial, it determines how the asset is treated, traded, and integrated into compliant financial systems. For institutional investors, it removes a major barrier, opening the door to broader, more confident capital participation. Evernorth argues that regulatory clarity could be the catalyst XRP has been waiting for. Clear rules would remove the uncertainty holding institutions back, unlocking sidelined capital and driving greater scale, liquidity, and market credibility. The impact goes far beyond classification. Clear rules would unlock stablecoins as a core layer of on-chain finance, enabling smoother integration into payments, lending, and cross-border settlement. For XRP, already positioned in these flows, thanks to Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin, that transparency strengthens its role within a more scalable, fully functional blockchain-based financial system. CLARITY Act Could Be the Catalyst for XRP’s Next Big Leap in Global Finance A formal token taxonomy under the CLARITY Act would define digital asset categories, giving XRP a clear legal framework. This precision empowers developers and institutions to build structured markets, from lending protocols to tokenized assets, with greater confidence and lower legal risk. The impact could extend far beyond U.S. borders because egulatory clarity could set a global precedent, and Evernorth believes a clear U.S. framework could become the blueprint for tokenized capital markets worldwide, pushing XRP adoption well beyond its current reach. Industry leaders are already signaling urgency. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has publicly urged Coinbase boss Brian Armstrong to step aside and let the legislation move forward, while former CFTC chair Chris Giancarlo told lawmakers that the bill could stabilize broader segments of the banking system, not just crypto. Evernorth isn’t just watching from the sidelines. With over 473 million XRP in its treasury, the firm plans to deploy capital into on-ledger markets and launch native XRP lending, potentially unlocking $100 billion in idle assets and adding major liquidity directly on-chain. Conclusion Evernorth is making things clear that regulation is now the catalyst, not the obstacle. If the CLARITY Act delivers on legal certainty, XRP could evolve from a speculative token into a core pillar of modern finance. With institutional capital ready to flow, on-chain lending markets emerging, and global standards potentially mirroring U.S. policy, XRP’s next chapter could redefine how value moves across the world.